Bills Fantasy Friday: Week 3 Start 'Em/Sit 'Em
Welcome back to Fantasy Football Friday here at Buffalo Rumblings. We're quickly nearing the end of September and the time when most fantasy squads begin proving whether they are contenders or not. It's about the time when we start learning whether all those pre-season fantasy projections and rankings were legit, or just random hopes.
The Buffalo Bills will be facing the New Orleans Saints this Sunday in a game that will be rich in fantasy starters. It's a great matchup for the Bills players who are fantasy-worthy - one of the best they'll have all season. Can they live up to our hopes for a big statistical performance and victory? Let's dive into this week's individual fantasy players of note for the Bills and Saints, and my random advice, after the jump.
Quarterbacks
Drew Brees - If ever there was an every-week starter, Drew Brees is it. I can't imagine anybody ever sitting Brees unless you lose points for success. Brees is the best QB in fantasy right now, and unfortunately, there's no reason to believe the Bills will shut down Brees this week. Unless you're one of those Bills fans who never starts an opposing player on your fantasy roster, Brees will be there piling up points for you this week. Verdict: Start 'Em
Trent Edwards - Edwards has a juicy matchup this week with New Orleans' 29th-ranked passing defense. Normally, I'm not one who would ever consider starting Edwards in a non-bye week or non-injury fill-in, but if I owned him I'd probably be getting ready to move him into the starting lineup. If the Bills get down early or get down big, Edwards will be throwing to make the game closer. If they control the clock and sustain drives, there should be plenty of opportunities to put a couple balls in the end zone. The Saints will bend all day and aren't an intimidating defense. After seeing the way our RB has chewed up chunks of yards this season, I'm guessing the Saints will be daring Edwards to beat them. He should do a good job of that and is in line for some gaudy stats this week. Whether that will be good enough for a Bills victory, who knows, but that's irrelevant for this discussion. Donovan McNabb owners should be happy to have Trent as their backup this week. The only thing that should hold owners back from starting Edwards this week are the matchups the top QBs face this week. Of those normally ranked ahead of him, only Kurt Warner (vs Ind), Tony Romo (vs Car) and Matt Ryan (@NE) face defenses ranked in the top half of the league in defending the pass. Warner might be the only one I'd consider benching for sure, but even then, that game is likely to be a shootout. Edwards may not get many starts simply because of the other matchups around the league. Verdict: Start 'Em in deep leagues and two-QB leagues.
Running Backs
Pierre Thomas - It's looking more and more like Thomas will start this week after missing the first week and only playing special teams last week. His knee is not yet 100%, but it's darn close. He's looking to wear a smaller, less bulky brace, and has practiced all week. My guess is he starts and gets 12-15 touches. He's been productive whenever he's been in the lineup, so if by Sunday he's a definite go, then he'll likely be a solid RB2 this week. I would definitely start him as a flex option this week. If his status is still up in the air, or the Saints don't plan on working him too much, keep him on the bench. Verdict: Start 'Em if he's a definite go, RB2/flex
Reggie Bush - I really hate Reggie Bush as a running back. Every time I watch the Saints, I wonder why they don't just call him a WR. He lines up enough in the slot and he runs the ball exactly how you'd expect a WR to take a handoff. Expect him to get his normal 7-10 carries and another 5-7 receptions. As always, Bush is a much better option in PPR leagues and as a flex. Going up against Bills LBs Kawika Mitchell and Keith Ellison in coverage - a group that has allowed RBs to catch 18 passes for 125 yards and a touchdown in two games this season - Bush will be plenty active and have a chance to put up better-than-usual numbers. Verdict: Start 'Em in PPR leagues or as a flex
Mike Bell - Bell is currently 4th in the NFL in rushing yards with 229 on 45 carries. However, he's probably not going to play after spraining his MCL. He would have lost touches to Thomas anyways. Keep him stashed on your bench and hope he gets a shot again when he's healthy. Verdict: Sit 'Em
Lynell Hamilton - Unless you're a Saints fan, you're probably saying..."who?" With Bell likely out and Thomas still a bit iffy, Hamilton is next in line for touches. More on him later. Verdict: Pick him up, and keep an eye on Thomas
Fred Jackson - Jackson has been one of the biggest surprises in all of fantasy football so far this year. He's currently second in the NFL in total yards behind Tennessee's Chris Johnson, averaging 164 yards per game thus far. Freddy also leads the Bills in receiving with 11 receptions for 108 yards. Expect another heavy workload this week as the Bills try to control the ball. Look for the screen pass to make its presence felt again. I don't think the Saints' LBs can cover him at all. Jackson is looking like one of the best starts in the league this week; I just wish I had him on my teams. Verdict: Start 'Em
Wide Receivers
Marques Colston - I think Colston is one of the most underrated wide receivers in the league. He's big, strong, has great hands and makes plays. What more can you ask for? Oh yeah, he scores a ton of touchdowns too. He's an every-week starter, even with Brees spreading the ball around more than fantasy owners would like. I bet he finishes as a Top 5 WR this season, and maybe even No. 1, if he remains healthy for the whole year. He should see plenty of opportunities against the Bills' mediocre pass defense. Verdict: Start 'Em
Lance Moore - During a slow start this season (just 2 receptions), Moore has been battling a hamstring injury he suffered early in last week's game against Philadelphia. He might not even play this week, having missed practice again on Thursday. He's a guy that will produce this season; he just needs to get healthy first. Look elsewhere this week. Verdict: Sit 'Em
Devery Henderson - Henderson is one of those fantasy players that flashes big time potential from time to time, but never puts it together on a consistent basis. He seems to start fast every year, then disappear for long stretches. He's got shaky hands and isn't much of a threat to catch more than a handful of passes each week. He is one of the better deep threats in the league, and Brees loves going downfield to him. The Bills' defense has done a rather good job of avoiding big plays for a couple of years now, so expect them to be keying on Henderson deep. He's got boom or bust potential every week, which is why you should never rely on him. However, with Moore probably missing the game, Henderson will have plenty of opportunities. He's a decent WR3 this week. Verdict: Start 'Em
Robert Meachem - The 2007 Round 1 pick has just 15 career catches after missing his rookie year to a knee injury. He's another big play receiver, as he's averaged over 23 yards per reception on those 15 catches, and scored four times. With Moore likely out, Meachem will see plenty of playing time, but hasn't proven enough to rely on. He should have his best game of the season to date this week, but I'm not sure I'd risk starting him. Verdict: Sit 'Em
Terrell Owens - After spending more time dropping passes than making plays, T.O. was able to get into the end zone in the fourth quarter last week. Hopefully, that's the play that really gets him going. His targets aren't where he wants them to be, and not where we want them to be either. At some point, Alex Van Pelt and Edwards need to find ways to get Owens the ball more. The reverse last week was a good start, but now the underneath looks need to start coming. Derek Schouman has done a good job controlling the underneath passing game for Edwards thus far, but now that he's out for the season, Owens and company need to step up their games. That means stop dropping touchdowns! One of these games, T.O. is going to have a monster game. This week is a good opportunity. Verdict: Start 'Em
Lee Evans - Like Owens, Evans needs more looks, but he also needs to step up his game. He dropped a touchdown last week as well, though it wasn't as easy of a ball that Owens dropped. Edwards started looking downfield more last week, and I expect that to continue as the offense gets more comfortable. Evans will get his chances to make some big plays this week, but the rest of his fantasy game is always so questionable. I think he'll have a nice game this week, and this is probably one of the last times I suggest starting him all year. I'm going against what I'd normally do with Evans, and would start him this week. Verdict: Start 'Em
Josh Reed, Roscoe Parrish, Steve Johnson - Don't bother. Reed has the most value, but isn't worth starting even if a potential passing contest.
Tight Ends
Jeremy Shockey - I think he's been one of the most overrated players in the league since he was drafted. His hands will always remain a question mark to me, and his inconsistencies and injury history are too much for me to bother with him on a weekly basis. The Bills' defense has given up a ton of points to tight ends this year. In fact, they've given up the most fantasy points in the league to that position. Yuck. With that said, I still don't like Shockey. I think the Bills will do a good job on him this week, and would guess that most fantasy teams have him as their second TE anyhow. I'd be going with the other, but understand if you roll with Shockey. Verdict: Toss up, but I say Sit 'Em
Shawn Nelson, Derek Fine - With Schouman done, those looks will have to go somewhere. Expect the WRs to start seeing more passes, but Edwards still needs a security blanket underneath. Nelson still doesn't look ready for a full-time workload, so don't expect him to be that guy. I don't think his role will change all that much, yet. By default, Fine could be in line for decent production going forward. He'll be a solid option for Edwards, but not much of a fantasy option. Verdict: Sit 'Em
Kickers
John Carney - Carney is tied for second among kickers in points scored so far this season. Being the placekicker for the most prolific offense in the league will do that for a guy. Despite being limited with range on longer field goals, Carney will have plenty of chances to put points on the board each week. If you get extra points for longer field goals, you might want to look into a kicker who will get more FG opportunities, but Carney is a kicker that should be started in every league based on the number of points he'll likely score. Verdict: Start 'Em
Rian Lindell - Guess who's tied with Carney for points scored thus far? Since we're talking about Lindell here, I'm guessing you should be able to figure it out (even you, Saints fans!). The Bills have done a good job of putting points on the board, and that should continue this week. Normally, I wouldn't consider LIndell a starting kicker for fantasy teams, but this week he looks like a good bet. Verdict: Start 'Em
Defense/Special Team
New Orleans - The Saints have been a pretty opportunistic defense thus far with 7 turnovers forced, two sacks and a touchdown, but that was done against a pair of quarterbacks making their first career starts. They need to prove it over the long haul, or play the Rams, before I consider starting them, though. Verdict: Sit 'Em
Buffalo - Against the Saints? Are you crazy? Verdict: Sit 'Em
Sleepers
Lynell Hamilton - If Pierre Thomas were to be limited again this week, I'd expect Hamilton to get a good chunk of the carries, and perhaps even the majority of them. He's big (235 pounds) and has taken many of the first team reps in practice this week. At the very least, he could be a solid goal line option for the Saints this week. If you are in a deep league, go pick him up and see how the next couple of days plays out. He could be a good option by the time 4PM Sunday rolls around.
Shawn Nelson - I'm not really sure the Bills have any real sleeper options available, but Nelson could surprise if given more snaps. The team will likely be looking to increase his role in the passing game as the season progresses. With Schouman out, that time frame may have been sped up a bit. He's going to be a red zone option all season for this team, but if he starts getting more looks between the 20s, he might be a solid option going forward. Don't expect huge numbers, but he'll always be a threat for a touchdown with his size.
*****
This could be a fun one for fantasy teams this week. Hopefully, the Saints' offensive players disappoint! As always, use this post as your fantasy open thread. Good luck everyone!
50 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Edwards and RB help please
I have Edwards as a back up in most leagues. He is actually out performing Warner in ESPN leagues. Edwards is tied for 3rd place in points while Warner is 7th. Food for thought.
Pick three please…Gore, Westbrook, Hightower, Benson, Buckhalter. Westbrook is banged up, so I like Benson, but hate that hes going against the Steelers D. Not sure how many carries Buckhalter will get. I’m going against my former boss this week, (we are friends) so I really want to win!
Why not Bobby April?
Depends on how you get points in your league. Hightower could be a good option going up against a bad colts run defense on a short week. Gore is a bit of a gamble too with the viking’s run defense. If you get points for total yards, hightower might be the best choice, since he’s a threat to catch passes too – i think he had over 100 yards receiving in week 1. I’d stay away from westbrook and buckhalter. I personally hate westbrook in fantasy – when he’s perfectly healthy, he does nothing, but in games where you don’t even know if he’ll play, then he breaks out.
All that being said, Gore is your number 1 for a reason, and the vikings run defense (although lauded) has yet to be too great this year.
by quantumuprising on Sep 25, 2009 9:02 AM EDT up reply actions
oh yeah
I also have Pierre Thomas. Could play Percy Harvin as flex and use two RBs. But may have to play Harvin over Boldin even though I would hate to. Thats when Boldin will do something.
Why not Bobby April?
Slow your roll on harvin: http://profootballtalk.nbcsports.com/2009/09/24/percy-harvin-is-sick-again/
apparently he’s been sitting out practice with an unknown illness. I have harvin as well, and will be checking this right up until lockout time. Boldin being up in the air hurts as well.
by quantumuprising on Sep 25, 2009 10:04 AM EDT up reply actions
Thanks
Thanks for the link. Will keep an eye on that.
Why not Bobby April?
by nickdaniels on Sep 25, 2009 10:16 AM EDT up reply actions
Never thought i'd say it
But im considering starting Joe Flacco or Trent Edwards ahead of Tom Brady, and I have been all week. I’m in a league where you get a point for every 5 yards passing, and so far both edwards and flacco have put up many more points than brady. Its a gamble, but i think flacco against cleveland or trent against NO is a better matchup than brady against atl.
Of course, brady will probably throw for 500 yards and 7 touchdowns against atlanta.
by quantumuprising on Sep 25, 2009 8:56 AM EDT reply actions
Flacco
I like Flacco against Cleveland’s D this week. Also think Edwards will put up numbers. You have a good problem. Brady at home after a loss, could mean big points. Like I said…you have a great problem.
Why not Bobby April?
Agree with your assessments except for Shockey
I hope I’m wrong, but I believe Shockey will get his points this week. We have seen 4 TD’s against us in 2 games scored by TE’s. With 2 TD’s already on Shockey’s stat sheet this year, and rain in the forecast (forcing Brees to throw shorter passes), I’d have to be an idiot not to start him this week!
PS – I agree that Shockey has been overrated throughout his career though.
Who can make a play? I can make a play!
-T.O.
Drew Brees
Benching him for Eli Manning. I honestly think Eli will have a better week agains the Bucs than Brees will against the Bills.
Fantasy Rule #1
Leave emotions at the door.
No way do you start Eli over Brees. Buffalo has given up 5 passing scores, and with a banged up Saints running back stable you know they’re just going to continue to pass. I know the Bucs secondary is downright atrocious, but look at the weapons Eli has – Steve Smith, and Mario Manningham. Not exactly Colston, Bush, and Moore.
He only scored 3 less points than Brees last week.
Cowboys Passing D is better than the Bucs…
Plus…only once in his entire career has Drew went 3 or more games in a row at 100+ passer rating.
….I think Eli is going to have another big week against the Bucs this week..
Play Eli if you really think he’s going to do better. He is a dang good fantasy QB and though Brees has yet to prove himself mortal, the argument’s got some points. And actually, the Giants’ Smith and Manningham are likely to outproduce Colston, Lance Moore, and Reggie Bush on their own. It’s Devery Henderson that is Brees’ real second weapon. As far as Buffalo’s defense being ranked so poorly, consider that we’ve given up 5 passing scores because we’ve only trailed for less than a minute so far this entire season, so teams are passing on us to catch up. We’re going to trail this week plenty. Oh, we’ve also had two pick-sixes.
Mmmph rrgh prrmf! - someone with his mouth gagged
This is the first week im going to start Evans over Harvin
I also have Henderson….but I just can’t start him againts the Bills. A conflict of interest makes for a really nervous type feeling during the game. I don’t really have too many questions about my team this weeks, the matchups are there for me. My only starter that im not 100% behind is the jets defense. They have been fairly dominant the first two weeks, I just don’t know how well they will do vs ten. Your thoughts?
by dragonwag0n on Sep 25, 2009 9:46 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
The big question is, who is your other defense? I know conflicts of interest are bad, but you’ve got to disengage – i was torn on monday night cause i needed a huge game for brady, but obviously wanted the bills to win. it almost worked out. If you can’t separate FF and your real team, then you’re going to fail at FF.
by quantumuprising on Sep 25, 2009 10:06 AM EDT up reply actions
tough
I’m not starting Henderson either. Bills winning is more important than Fantasy. So I’m playing Wayne and Boldin instead…lol I think Titans will beat Jets, but the Jets D does look good. You never know what Chris Johnson is going to do. I like his chances against an aggressive pass rushing 3-4 Defense.
Why not Bobby April?
by nickdaniels on Sep 25, 2009 10:15 AM EDT up reply actions
Starting Henderson is a win-win. You either have the Bills do well and win the game, or your consolation prize is that your fantasy receiver probably did well. It’s not like you’re actively rooting against the Bills.
Mmmph rrgh prrmf! - someone with his mouth gagged
Plus if you start Henderson and he’s scoring points, he’s going to force the Bills to score more points! I have Henderson and am considering not starting him because he sees so little passes.
Twitter: helping to make anti-social people anti-socially social.
by TheAfghanTwilight on Sep 25, 2009 4:35 PM EDT up reply actions
I have Henderson, too, and I am benching him for Evans.
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Ignoring the grumblings on Rumblings.
by MattRichWarren on Sep 26, 2009 8:25 AM EDT up reply actions
I don't have another defense
I usually pick them up week by week with favorable matchups. I’ve used this strategy for years and its worked out well. I could pick up another one in FA, im just not sure whats available. Not starting Henderson isn’t purely based on him going against the Bills either, I just think i have 3 better starts at wr this week in Roddy White, Reggie Wayne and Lee Evans. It feels weird to be comfortable starting Bills players again…
by dragonwag0n on Sep 25, 2009 10:18 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
While i love the bills and i really hope evans plays well, i’m still not set on him as a fantasy player.
by quantumuprising on Sep 25, 2009 10:25 AM EDT up reply actions
I don’t know how you can be comfortable starting Evans…ever. He only has 4 catches for 57 yards, that’s awful for a starting WR…
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Sep 25, 2009 10:35 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
I understand that, Its just a gut feeling I have that hes going to have a big day against the Saints. Ive never had him on my fantasy team before because of his lack of consistancy of getting into the endzone. I do think he’s a better start than Henderson, Harvin and Bruce, who are my other recievers.
by dragonwag0n on Sep 25, 2009 10:55 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
I started him last week with decent results. He was on my bench in week 1 and in the lineup this week. It’s all about match-ups with him and a lot of luck.
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Ignoring the grumblings on Rumblings.
by MattRichWarren on Sep 26, 2009 8:26 AM EDT up reply actions
Moore is out,
for sure. I agree with the sit for shockey despite the soft Bills TE D. He is very inconsistent, and a tool.
Sweet home Orchard Park. #28
Ha ha
Quite a moral predicament.
Remember, though, when it comes to fantasy, your goal is to get more points regardless of team affiliation. You can root for Drew Brees to throw for 500 yards and score 6 TDs, just so long as the Saints still lose the game because Fred Jackson scores 7 TDs. (I doubt you’ll be rooting for Drew to do that as you’re watching the game, though . . . )
If, however, you do stick with your emotions, start Edwards, and he puts up more fantasy points than Brees, you gain full right to brag about that decision for the rest of your life.
by TheBobLoblawBlog on Sep 25, 2009 1:54 PM EDT up reply actions
:)
Yep, that’s exactly what I will be doing.
Not to mention that I would gladly lose a fantasy game if the Bills win this football game. Without a second of regret.
fantasy football
my wr now are andre johnson torry holt and tj housmandeh, and devery henderson is a free agent in my league should I get him or stay as is my running backs are steven jackson, marshawn lynch and willie parker.
Pick up Devery Henderson and drop Willie Parker. I’ve had Parker this season and he’s been a horrendous flop. I think it’s just time to cut your losses with the guy. You can hold out for one more week, but Henderson really is a pickup you should find a roster spot for.
Mmmph rrgh prrmf! - someone with his mouth gagged
willie parker
hey dyl I drafted parker in round 11 so it really doesn’t hurt if he produces in sunday’s game.
RBs and WRs
1 RB spot, 1 RB/WR spot, and 3 WR spots
RB Fred Jackson (NO)
RB Darren Sproles (Mia)
WR Santana Moss (@Det)
WR Jerricho Cotchery (Ten)
WR Chad Ochocinco (Pit)
On the bench
RB Felix Jones (Car)
RB Reggie Bush (Buf)
WR Wes Welker (listed as questionable) (Atl)
WR Johnny Knox (Sea)
Moss has been a complete dud this season, he only caught three passes for 35 yards against the Rams, and two passes for 6 yards against the Giants. I think I’ve gotta play Moss this week. If Welker dresses, I’m going to squeeze him in for Ochocinco…at least this is the plan. Jackson and Sproles are doing really well, and I have quality back up there. Welker against Atlanta is better than Ochocinco against Pittsburgh, right?
Mmmph rrgh prrmf! - someone with his mouth gagged
I’d go Jones over Sproles, and Welker over Moss and Cotchery.
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Sep 25, 2009 3:04 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
I benched Sproles last week and lived to regret it.
Doesn’t Sproles have like twice the production of Jones after 2 games? I know that the D they’re up against this weekend are a factor, but……
With Barber likely to sit out
Jones makes for a fantastic start. That guy is such a big play threat that he could put up huge numbers this week.
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
Hmm
Edwards or Matt Ryan this week (who has the Pats)?
Twitter: helping to make anti-social people anti-socially social.
by TheAfghanTwilight on Sep 25, 2009 4:27 PM EDT reply actions
That’s acutally a pretty tricky choice…I’m saying Ryan, and this is why. The Saints secondary is pretty good, they’ve got loads of talent at CB and one of the most wily safeties in the league, Darren Sharper. The Pats only strength in their defense is in their line — that New England secondary has been suspect for a couple years and it’s not gotten any better. If you have confidence that Atlanta’s line can keep Ryan upright, I’d go with him.
Mmmph rrgh prrmf! - someone with his mouth gagged
Plus if it rains as much as it’s supposed to, we all know Edwards hasn’t been your model poor-weather QB.
Twitter: helping to make anti-social people anti-socially social.
by TheAfghanTwilight on Sep 25, 2009 5:50 PM EDT up reply actions
I hate deciding which players to put in a lineup. It’s the one part of fantasy that I really dislike. I have a tendency to overthink during the long 5 or 6 days between games.
I’m in a TD league where you only get a point for every 40 yards passing and there’s no fractional points. INTs are a harsh -2 and TDs are 6. So who is more likely to throw mulitple TDs and who’s more likely to stink it up between:
Carson Palmer against a Polomalu-less Steelers D or
Jason Campbell in Detroit (it’s a 10 team league where you start two QBs, I didn’t actually draft Palmer to start and Campbell to backup).
Kickers are such a crapshoot, but in this league we carry two TEs, defenses and kickers. I’ve got Tynes (NYG) in Tampa Bay or Kris Brown (HOU) against Jacksonville. And another decision with Dustin Keller against the Titans or Greg Olsen in Seattle. And a third with the Jets D vs. the Titans or the Redskins D vs. Detroit?
Campbell, the Lions have allowed a league high 9 touchdowns, and while 6 of it was to the Saints, 3 of it wasn’t. And even if 6 were to the Saints, that’s 6 touchdowns. 6.
Tynes is the NFL’s no. 1 fantasy kicker so far this year — Tampa Bay’s not going to pose any problems for him. I’d really recommend playing him. Dustin Keller’s having a breakout year at your tight end spot (and Olsen’s not doing that great with Cutler). Jets D over Redskins. The Lions offense is not St. Louis, Stafford and co. will actually put some yards and points up against you like any other team. I believe the Jets D, led by Kris Jenkins, Bart Scott, and Darelle Revis, is primed for a good week against Ten after knocking off NE. The NYJ defense is built to stop the run and the pass.
Mmmph rrgh prrmf! - someone with his mouth gagged
Thanks. I’m still on the fence with Keller v Olsen. Definitely agree with everything else. And it’s not that I disagree with starting Keller, I just have no clue what to do with that one.
and while 6 of it was to the Saints, 3 of it wasn’t. And even if 6 were to the Saints, that’s 6 touchdowns. 6.
I think that’s the most convincing argument I’ve ever seen on this blog. I had Campbell in the lineup, but Yahoo Sports had me doubting myself because in their weekly rankings, all four guys had Palmer ranked considerably higher. I’m sticking with Campbell. It’s not just the upside of 6 TDs, I think he’s safer too. He won’t throw for 150 yards and three INTs like Palmer could.
I signed up for Second Life about a year ago. Back then my life was so great that I literally wanted a second one. In my Second Life I was also a paper salesman and I was also named Dwight. Absolutely everything was the same. Except I could fly. - Dwight Schrute
Some leagues allow you to play your best guys. Find one of those where everybody “starts” and at the end of the weekend your team is taken from your best possible score.
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Ignoring the grumblings on Rumblings.
by MattRichWarren on Sep 26, 2009 8:29 AM EDT up reply actions
I made my choice at WR – Carolina’s Steve Smith, Lee Evans, Roy Williams and on the bench Devrey Henderson and Donald Driver. I may pop Driver in for Williams before Sunday. I expect the Bills to be passing a lot.
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Ignoring the grumblings on Rumblings.
I benched Kellen Winslow this week in favor of Kevin Boss. I think Leftwich is toast against the Giants DL. Any thoughts, guys?
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Ignoring the grumblings on Rumblings.
Trent Edwards is starting over Aaron Rodgers again this week. I expect the Pack to get up early and run a lot while the Bills to be in a shootout and Trent to rack up a ton of yards. Picks are only -2 points and every 20 yards is +1 points so I am going to take my chances.
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Ignoring the grumblings on Rumblings.
Should i start Chris Chambers over DeSean Jackson?
"Hold ya chin up...nuh nuh nuh...gone" -Marshawn Lynch-
by billsoferie on Sep 26, 2009 12:03 PM EDT up reply actions
First of all, how did you get stuck with the two of them? If I am picking between the two I pick Jackson. Chambers has like 30 yards on the year. Jackson will probably start. Neither is a great option.
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Ignoring the grumblings on Rumblings.
by MattRichWarren on Sep 26, 2009 2:19 PM EDT up reply actions
Stuck with Jackson????
I wish I was stuck with Jackson on my teams….He’s been very, very good thus far, and should continue if he’s healthy…
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
I must have been thinking of someone else…. I dunno. Maybe Dexter Jackson… I dunno. (shakes head in confusion)
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Ignoring the grumblings on Rumblings.
by MattRichWarren on Sep 27, 2009 8:42 AM EDT up reply actions

by 





















