Bills' offensive pressure extends to Owens, too
Understatement of the century: there is a lot of pressure on the Buffalo Bills organization at the moment. Two men - head coach Dick Jauron and quarterback Trent Edwards - have had pressure on them for months. There's always pressure on the head coach and the quarterback. Over the weekend, the team ramped up the pressure by firing offensive coordinator Turk Schonert and replacing him with Alex Van Pelt - barely a week before the team's regular season opener.
While the bulk of the stress is currently riding on those three men, there's a fourth person in this organization we're forgetting when it comes to carrying a lot of weight on his shoulders. Every player on any NFL team is under pressure to perform, but receiver Terrell Owens is a cut above the rest - both in production and in pressure. Jauron, Van Pelt and Edwards all need to perform to win some games and save some jobs. Even their best effort will likely be wasted without production from Owens - so add T.O. to this list as well.
Owens was the catalyst for offensive change
When the Bills signed Owens to a one-year, $6.5 million deal this past March, most of us realized that his presence alone meant change was coming. It was at this point, I firmly believe, that Jauron and his coaching staff decided to move forward with plans for a no-huddle offensive philosophy. Up until the moment Owens signed his deal, Buffalo had never had offensive personnel that would allow them to dictate to defenses and attack. With Owens on board, they now had that type of talent.
But Owens only played in one drive in the pre-season, as he nursed a bum toe back to health - and he caught two passes for 27 yards on that one drive. For nearly five full games, Buffalo ran the no-huddle with the same offensive personnel that left them one of the worst offenses in 2008. That, at least in part, got Schonert fired. Had Owens been in the lineup, there's at least a small chance we're not still talking about a new offensive coordinator this morning.
That's the key - the Bills need Owens on the field more than most fans and experts realize. Without Owens, we're the same mediocre offense that has rarely proven its capability to take leads and close out wins. With a performing Owens, the offense has a chance to finally, mercifully, make some things happen.
Keying the no-huddle offense
The no-huddle offense is all about getting a defense on its heels. The way Jauron wants to run it, the tempo will be quick and unpredictable, and the Bills will be running plays that they know they are capable of executing to perfection. That's still a work in progress, but if the Bills can get to that point quickly, that's when defenses will start playing their corners off of Owens and running mate Lee Evans. That's when this offense can do serious damage.
Without two receiving threats on the outside, however, Buffalo's offense falls right back into the rut it's been in for much of this decade. Players such as Josh Reed, Roscoe Parrish, Steve Johnson, any of the team's tight ends, and running back Fred Jackson are useful weapons - but they are not weapons with which to dictate to a defense. They are role players; all can make things happen, but you can't build an offense around any of them.
This is why Owens was brought in (you know, besides the spike in season ticket sales, that is). One might believe the same can be said of Evans, but that's not entirely true, either - unlike Evans, Owens has the ability to hurt a defense at any level of the field. Teams can bracket coverage on Owens just as they do on Evans if only one is on the field, but Owens has shown that he can take a short pass for a big gain. That's something Evans has failed to do throughout his career.
Let's not forget Owens' situation, either
Owens is the key to the no-huddle working - and yes, arguments can be made for Edwards and the re-built offensive line. The fact is, good performances from all three areas are needed, so let's not diminish the importance of - and the pressure upon - Owens.
T.O. is nearing the end of his career. He's only guaranteed to be in Buffalo for one year, despite agent Drew Rosenhaus saying he'd like to stay beyond the 2009 season. No one's really sure just how healthy his toe is, despite Owens reporting himself that it is fully healed. Experts do not believe teams will be interested in signing Owens after his year in Buffalo is up if Owens is not on his best behavior. Oh, and there's a large contingent of folks who believe that Owens' once-pristine skill set is diminishing.
There's pressure on Owens personally to perform. The team needs him more than most are willing to admit. There may be pressure on Jauron, Van Pelt and Edwards this morning, but Owens deserves mention as well. With production from all four areas, the team has a chance to do good things this year. If not... well, you know the rest.
0 recs |
63 comments
|
Comments
I’m not worried about Owens. He has more credentials than Jauron, Edwards, and Edwards combined, times ten. He’s a Hall of Famer who isn’t washed up, yet. As long as he stays healthy, then he’s fine.
I want to see movies of my dreams. - Built to Spill
by jj24 on Sep 7, 2009 8:45 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
second Edwards should be Van Pelt
I want to see movies of my dreams. - Built to Spill
by jj24 on Sep 7, 2009 8:46 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If the offense implodes I think we can expect a TO explosion, crying about the ‘basic’ and ‘unimaginative’ offense.
Of course we could make things more challenging, Lisa, but then the stupider students would be in here complaining, furrowing their brows in a vain attempt to understand the situation--Seymour Skinner
by Ron From NM on Sep 7, 2009 9:48 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I am pretty sure that when Drew Rosenhaus
tucks T.O. into bed at night, he turns on some sleepy time music laced with post hypnotic suggestions like: I will work and play well with others, I will not question my QB’s sexuality, I will not call out my coaches even if they are wrong,….you know….helpful stuff like that.
T.O.’s goals for this season are different than any other. He is in rebuilding mode. Now, will he be able to keep biting his tongue even when it starts to bleed???
Teflon Jauron…..Nothing sticks to Dick
by Joe P. on Sep 7, 2009 10:41 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Where is T.O. going to help us?
Minimizing the check down routes, they are a good first down play once in a while.
Thining things out in the red zone. Leading to TD’s Vs FG’s
Allowing the TE’s and #3 Reciever to stretch the middle of the field.
Open up the down field pass to himself and Evans.
Enhancing the success rate of the draw and screen.
If one player can do all this then why haven’t we been looking in that direction over the past few years. More so than James Hardy and Peerless Price.
Only Real Men Wear Red, White, and Blue.
by VanScottM on Sep 7, 2009 10:20 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
If the o-line can give Edwards the time, and he can get the ball down field, T.O. or Evans ought to be open. Especially if T.O. draes coverage. I still say that there are very few corners in the league who can stay with Evans deep,
by Honeyroy77 on Sep 7, 2009 11:35 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed again
Evans is probably the biggest deep threat in the league!
by tremblay52 on Sep 7, 2009 1:13 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And to follow up on your statement, what happens to the Offense if T.O chooses to play somewhere else next year, how much will this offense regress?
by Hassanali181 on Sep 7, 2009 2:10 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Michael Crabtree lol
Kidding, TO will only be here for one season…. It’s gonna have to be internal, Johnson or Hardy!
by tremblay52 on Sep 7, 2009 2:34 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
we will be less then mediocre because offense isnt even the same as last year because of new o line. all we did was add TO and Maybin other than that team hasnt really immproved much more than last year. think maybe dick and ralph might be thinking that to these last few days.
keith_b
by Billzfan on Sep 7, 2009 10:59 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
The offensive line gave Trent enough time in the preseason.
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.
by MattRichWarren on Sep 7, 2009 11:59 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
True. This pre-season doesn’t fall on the O-Line, they gave plenty of time for Trent to make plays. It falls on Trent for being unable to pull the trigger. But simply having TO on the feild changes that because of how deffense react when TO is there as opposed to when he’s not.
Captain of the "Promote Bob Sanders to Deffensive Coordinator" band wagon.
by CanadianBillsFan on Sep 7, 2009 12:28 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
They didn’t exactly look capable of run blocking that well though…
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Sep 7, 2009 12:31 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
That is true…
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.
by MattRichWarren on Sep 7, 2009 8:49 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It’s very possible that’s the case. The hope comes with TO potentially making Trent a better QB. That is how this could be a very different team this year.
by kaisertown on Sep 7, 2009 12:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
If anything T.O. will improve Trents confidence, the O-Line will make Trent a better quarterback.
Only Real Men Wear Red, White, and Blue.
by VanScottM on Sep 7, 2009 4:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Not to argue your point But,
Our defense wasn’t that bad last year, definately room for improvement. A healthy Schobel will improve our pressure along with Maybin. Secondly, You should see huge improvements from McKelvin and Pozlusny. Although most wont agree with me on this I will also say that Ellison’s play will be more elevated as well and this will allow Mitchel to be more of a threat in blitz packages. Also, there is an improved Chris Ellis coming off the edge and a decent DL rotation that should keep us fresh and hungry for all sixty mintues.
Our offense compared to last year. First and foremost is T.O. Second and just as important because the two go hand in hand, is the No- Huddle attack. We have not seen what this can do. We have not had all the pieces in place on a consistent basis. When this happens things will start to improve exponetionally.
The downside is our turnovers and inability to throw the damn ball away and wait for the next play. Think about it. At first all the Preseason games we had the ones we stunk in didn’t look so bad the second time around. It was the turn overs, sacks/ fumbles and slow to develop decision making by our quarterback. We improve in two out of the three of these and this offense will middle of the pack with tremendous upside.
Only Real Men Wear Red, White, and Blue.
by VanScottM on Sep 7, 2009 5:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think everything Brian says here is correct, but it also leads to a big question: if having a second sideline WR is so vital to the Bills’ offensive strategy, why in the world didn’t they acquire two of them during the offseason. Injuries happen, especially to WR’s who expose their bodies to crushing blows when they go up to get a pass. If Owens or Evans are injured at any time during the season, we will be back to where we were during the preseason, which, as Brian says, means disaster.
This situation suggests to me once again the lack of long-range planning at OBD. You have heard me say it before and you will likely hear it again from me: the Bills need a smart, football-savvy GM to run this ship and to look ahead to the team’s future needs. Making decisions by committee is not the way to go in the NFL.
by Macktruck on Sep 7, 2009 11:49 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
How many teams have three sideline WRs? That’s asking too much, really. If we lose one of a handful or starters the season is down the tubes. Just like most teams, BTW.
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.
by MattRichWarren on Sep 7, 2009 12:00 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
LOL – yeah, exactly. Come on, Mack – if you can name one NFL team that has three receivers that are either #1 or #1A, I’ll eat my hat.
Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott
by Brian Galliford on Sep 7, 2009 12:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
B
I want to see movies of my dreams. - Built to Spill
by jj24 on Sep 7, 2009 12:04 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Oops.. Anyway, Breaston is the best third receiver in football.
I want to see movies of my dreams. - Built to Spill
by jj24 on Sep 7, 2009 12:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Cincy has three guys who could run every route as an outside WR. I don’t think they were counting on Chris Henry to step it up like he has though.
And maybe Steve Johnson does deserve all the love he gets around here and Buffalo already has three on the roster!
by kaisertown on Sep 7, 2009 12:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’m not suggesting another #1 or #1A, but a genuine #2. That may in time be Hardy, but the jury is still very much out on him and he may not start contributing significantly until the middle of next year. The guy who should be our back-up sideline WR is Roscoe, but he has shown a total inability so far to achieve separation in real games (as opposed to practice). You may remember I was strongly in favor of picking up Nate Washington last February and essentially using him to replace Roscoe. That would have been a relatively inexpensive move (we would have saved Roscoe’s $3 million salary) and he would have provided the sort of high quality back-up I’m talking about. He has looked very good for the Titans so far until pulling his hammy (yes, he’s injuried, but that’s my point — that happens to all WR’s). If we had added him I don’t believe anyone would have said that our WR corps was excessive or unbalanced. And if you don’t like Washington (who has largely overcome his earlier tendency to drop balls by the way), there were other options.
Do other teams stock up on WR’s this way? A lot of them build their offenses around power running games and don’t need to. Our offense depends on having two WR’s who are fast and big enough to go deep on any given play. That fact has been magnified by the decision to go no-huddle. If this is the kind of offense you want then you need the personnel to make it work, including sufficient back-ups.
by Macktruck on Sep 7, 2009 12:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’m shocked that you typed all of that and not once did you mention Steve Johnson.
Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott
by Brian Galliford on Sep 7, 2009 1:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, that is shocking in retrospect. He could do very well this year, but so far he hasn’t shown the burning speed of a real sideline threat. I hope he (and Hardy) prove me wrong on this. Still, it would be good not to be putting all our eggs in the T.O. basket, as your piece makes clear we are doing.
by Macktruck on Sep 7, 2009 2:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Since when do you need blazing speed to be a good outside threat?
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Sep 7, 2009 2:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yep. Ed McCaffrey, Amani Toomer. Off the top of my head. All you need is to separate, and if Trent Edwards is to be believed, Johnson excels at separating.
Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott
by Brian Galliford on Sep 7, 2009 3:01 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I hope that’s right, but I will bet you anything with this coaching staff that if Evans or Owens is out it will be Josh Reed going down the sidelines the way he did last year, and that didn’t work. Or they might use Roscoe, which would be another exercise in futility. If they do use Stevie and he shows he can do the job I’ll be ecstatic — although speed does help.
by Macktruck on Sep 7, 2009 3:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I’m curious to see if the change in offensive coordinators will lead to a change in the philosophy behind using some of the team’s younger offensive personnel (I speak, of course, of Demetrius Bell and Stevie). Time will tell.
Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott
by Brian Galliford on Sep 7, 2009 5:58 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Why would you call Steve Johnson "Stevie" when Scuba Steve is soooooo much cooler :-)
Teflon Jauron…..Nothing sticks to Dick
by Joe P. on Sep 7, 2009 7:17 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I call him Scuba Steve. I also call him Stevie Wonder. Pretty soon, I shall call him Scuba Wonder.
Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott
by Brian Galliford on Sep 7, 2009 8:19 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
OK.....just don't call him Scuba Stevie :-)
Teflon Jauron…..Nothing sticks to Dick
by Joe P. on Sep 7, 2009 8:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Agreed
I was thinking the same thing. Johnson has future star written all over him, if he can only get the chance. When he does, all the kid does is make plays. I hope he’s watching T.O. closely, because I think Steve J. will be our next T.O. while sadly I think Hardy will be an afterthought.
On another note, the last person I worry about handling pressure in the Bills’ organization is T.O. He thrives under pressure. Hopefully in addition to helping the offense go some of that will rub off as well, because I haven’t seen anyone in this organization be able to handle pressure like T.O. in a long time, possibly ever.
by billskk69 on Sep 8, 2009 1:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Johnson has future star written all over him
??? Really?
He has future contributor, maybe starter, written all over him. Calling him a future star is getting WAAAAY ahead of yourself!!!
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Sep 8, 2009 1:45 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You do know that Tennessee gave Washington 27 mil, right? And a starting job on a team that went to the playoffs last year, so Buffalo would have had to beat the Titans’ offer.
And like Brian said, for a guy who seemed to be a big fan of Steve Johnson, how do you not mention him?
by kaisertown on Sep 7, 2009 2:20 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It was 27 million over six years, so 4.5 million per year. Roscoe costs 3 million a year and we get a lot less from him than that price would suggest (which is why the team tried to trade him during the offseason).
by Macktruck on Sep 7, 2009 2:24 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Roscoe costs 3 mil this year. And then 1.5 mil in each of his final two seasons. Buffalo does have Josh Reed potentially coming off the books next year too. Signing Washington would have been a good idea if and only if Buffalo was confident he could start across from Evans next season. Otherwise, it’s just too much to pay for a slot WR. And there’s always the chance that a WR whose best ability comes as a deep threat won’t be productive in a Trent Edwards offense.
by kaisertown on Sep 7, 2009 3:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Arizona: Fitzy, Bolden, Breaston.
Sorry Bri, but you asked.
Captain of the "Promote Bob Sanders to Deffensive Coordinator" band wagon.
by CanadianBillsFan on Sep 7, 2009 12:30 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The Saints with Colston, Moore and Henderson
Those guys like Arizona have 3 WRs who could play for any team
(443): My mom came into my room and told me to flip off the tv. I gave it the middle finger. Note to self: STOP SMOKING THIS S#!T
-textsfromlastnight.com
by WABillsfan on Sep 7, 2009 1:19 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think that your stretching it a bit there WA. While those guys are a good receiving group, none of them were in the league’s top 20 last year. So while they are threats, they’re not that good.
Captain of the "Promote Bob Sanders to Deffensive Coordinator" band wagon.
by CanadianBillsFan on Sep 7, 2009 2:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Henderson?!?! Whaaaaa? His hands make Braylon Edwards look like Jerry Rice…
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Sep 7, 2009 2:23 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think Breaston is pretty spectacularly overrated. Useful because of the guys he lines up with, but he’d struggle anywhere else. JMO.
Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott
by Brian Galliford on Sep 7, 2009 1:21 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
And I’m inclined to agree with you. On any other team Breaston would be an average slot receiver. But the fact is that because of who he has around him (Boldin and Fitzy) and who he has throwing to him (Warner) Breaston is a big threat and therefore counts.
Captain of the "Promote Bob Sanders to Deffensive Coordinator" band wagon.
by CanadianBillsFan on Sep 7, 2009 2:19 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, I’ll agree too. In a different scenario (say starting for an injured TO here in Buffalo), Breaston is a pretty marginal player.
by kaisertown on Sep 7, 2009 2:22 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
He’d do better than Josh Reed ;)
I want to see movies of my dreams. - Built to Spill
by jj24 on Sep 7, 2009 2:40 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
You mean like Panda did?
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.
by MattRichWarren on Sep 7, 2009 8:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I believe the same will be true with Washington in Tennessee this year.
by billskk69 on Sep 8, 2009 1:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Because you can’t have everything. This is a team with Evans, Owens, a 2.5 mil per season slot WR, the best PR in the league, a 2nd round WR from a year ago and a great prospect in Steve Johnson. What were they going to do with another WR?
Is WR really an injury prone position? Evans has never missed a game and TO has missed one game in the last three seasons. TO’s age makes a full season questionable.
And I thought you were a big Steve Johnson fan? I think he could fill in as well as any other player Buffalo could have reasonably acquired.
by kaisertown on Sep 7, 2009 12:02 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
We are all optimistic about Steve Johnson
But unless, his ribs were still sore he had an opportunity to step in for T.O. Unless the Bills are hiding him on the roster they gave that time to Roscoe. I am not sure Scuba Steve is ready yet, but soon will be, James Hardy well, lets not go there, he hasn’t really had a chance to settle in, but IMO he is not Steve Johnson and definately not T.O. Anyway, T.O. is at a level all his own, I do agree with this and he would confirm it.
Only Real Men Wear Red, White, and Blue.
by VanScottM on Sep 7, 2009 4:51 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It’s kind of a sad indictment on the rest of the Offense that without TO they are borderline pathetic. We just have to hope TO can perform miracles.
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Sep 7, 2009 12:16 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
T.O., regardless of how he plays, will back off the safeties like he did in the HoF game. It should open up underneath stuff.
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.
by MattRichWarren on Sep 7, 2009 12:27 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Don't forget Evans here.
T.O.’s presence is supposed to expose Lee as well. Evans hits the 10 TD mark and it will have alot to do with who is on the other side. You are right with the pathetic part, we have allready been there and seen it.
Only Real Men Wear Red, White, and Blue.
by VanScottM on Sep 7, 2009 5:05 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think that the necessity of Owens in our offence is comaprable to our acquisition of James Lofton with the K-Gun
Sure back then we had a FANTASTIC talent pool with 3 future HOFer’s already estabished on the team (Kellyand Thomas are already in and the is little doubt that Andre Reed will get the eventually) but it’s the extra added peice of James Lofton (also a HOFer) that made the K-Gun great.
It’s the same situation that we find ouselves in today (not the talent end, but at the necessity end). Without TO our offense will do nothing and this season is doomed. So while I wont say that TO should be the centre of pressure for this offense, his simple presence on the feild is what makes it work.
Captain of the "Promote Bob Sanders to Deffensive Coordinator" band wagon.
by CanadianBillsFan on Sep 7, 2009 12:24 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Don Beebe too!
Delightfully Ignoring The Truth since 1995.
by NeverendingOptimism on Sep 7, 2009 9:41 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
It's all about the offense you run
Carolina has had Steve Smith and (crickets, crickets) for years. But Smith doesn’t get the Lee Evans treatment. Why? Because Carolina stopped teams from bracket covering Smith with the run game.
The 90’s Broncos has Ed McCaffery, who ran a 4.8 40 out of Stanford. But the Bronco’s system allowed him to be effective, because 9 of 11 defenders were worried about the zone runs.
A run-first attack doesn’t necessarily need 2 great WR’s.
A pass attack needs 2 great/good WR’s, preferably fast. Noting the point about not needing fast outside receivers: I say it’s needed. We replaced Loftin with Bill Brooks, a possession receiver. Opposing defenses clamped down on our offense. Same thing happened once Peerless Price left.
Wouldn’t it be neat to have a run first attack and 2 great WR’s? Wait, that’s why no one could stop the 90’s Cowboys.
by Der Jaeger on Sep 7, 2009 10:22 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Why? Because Carolina stopped teams from bracket covering Smith with the run game.
Or because Steve Smith is far superior to Lee Evans….It’s not even fair to compare Evans to Smith.
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Sep 8, 2009 1:12 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Going with K there, usually he had 2-3 guys on him and dude still made plays
I have never seen Evans do that consistently
(443): My mom came into my room and told me to flip off the tv. I gave it the middle finger. Note to self: STOP SMOKING THIS S#!T
-textsfromlastnight.com
by WABillsfan on Sep 8, 2009 3:37 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Yeah, the Carolina run game is something that just emerged last season. Sure, they ran it pretty often before that, but DeShawn “fumbles” Foster and a super old Stephen Davis weren’t providing Smith with lighter coverage than Evans gets. The Evans gets double covered excuse is ridiculous.
Check out what Steve Smith did in 2005 with talent that doesn’t come close to what Evans has had so far:
http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/teams/car/stats?season=2005_2&qualified=
And 2007 was probably even worse from a talent perspective:
http://sports.yahoo.com/nfl/teams/car/stats?season=2007_2&qualified=
by kaisertown on Sep 8, 2009 11:51 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
or because steve smith goes up and gets the ball in double coverage and scores touchdowns anyways
"Potential just means you haven’t done sh## yet"
by willgarr15 on Sep 8, 2009 10:51 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Carolina has had Steve Smith and (crickets, crickets) for years. But Smith doesn’t get the Lee Evans treatment. Why? Because Carolina stopped teams from bracket covering Smith with the run game.
First, Mushin Muhammad isn’t a slouch as a second receiver. Second, have you ever seen what Steve Smith does to DB’s after he catches the ball? He punishes corners and safeties with stiff arms. He breaks tackles on a regular basis. He’s just better than Lee, period.
"I call him Scuba Steve. I also call him Stevie Wonder. Pretty soon, I shall call him Scuba Wonder." - B.G.
by jj24 on Sep 7, 2009 11:55 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
to
I am a newbie and I agree that if to doesn’t perform good the bills are in trouble.
by bills21 on Sep 8, 2009 1:24 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Welcome to the blog.
Playing Realistic Optimist at Buffalo Rumblings since 2008. Fear can hold you prisoner. Hope can set you free.
by MattRichWarren on Sep 8, 2009 6:45 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 



























