Examining Buffalo's Heavy-Front Run Defense
In a Week 5 loss to the Jacksonville Jaguars, the Buffalo Bills unveiled a new "heavy" run defensive front designed to help shore up the league's worst run defense. Though the Jags still ran for 216 yards in a 36-26 victory, the heavy package will apparently remain a part of coordinator George Edwards' defensive arsenal moving forward.
After breaking down the numbers from two of Buffalo's worst run-defending performances of the 2010 season, we're not precisely sure why the package will continue to be utilized.
In order to properly express our argument here, we decided to break down film of the Jaguars game, as well as the Bills' Week 3 loss to the New England Patriots, when the defense allowed 200 rushing yards playing the vast majority of the game with a four-man front. Sure, Jacksonville and New England play different styles of offense, but they're still among the league's best rushing offenses, as Jacksonville currently rates No. 6 averaging 135 yards per game, while New England is No. 12 at 123.2 yards per game.
In short: going from a "light" four-lineman look in New England to a "heavy" four-man look against Jacksonville really didn't change anything at all.
Week 3 in New England
As the Patriots operate out of multiple wide receiver sets so frequently (especially then, when Randy Moss was still on the team), Buffalo spent much of Week 3 playing out of defensive packages featuring four down linemen. It was in this game that Aaron Maybin saw his most extensive playing time, getting over 30 snaps as a defensive end along a four-man line.
Chris Kelsay also spent the vast majority of his time at defensive end. Dwan Edwards saw a handful of reps at end, as well - particularly on early downs - but he, along with Kyle Williams and Marcus Stroud, spent the vast majority of their time inside at defensive tackle positions. Torell Troup? He barely saw the field. Alex Carrington? He was inactive. At linebacker, the Bills were without Paul Posluszny, so they spent most of their time with Keith Ellison and Bryan Scott on the field in traditional linebacker roles (a factor in the team's lack of physicality against the run, to be sure).
New England ran the ball 38 times in that contest; that total includes three Tom Brady kneel-downs to end the game, so really, they ran the ball 35 times. Of those 35 rushes, 21 - yes, that's 60% of New England's runs on the day - gained four or more yards. Clearly, after that type of performance - and particularly after the one that followed, a miserable Week 4 effort against the Jets - some sort of tweak needed to be implemented. Ideally, that tweak would lower the number of rushes that gained four or more yards. Right?
Hence, the heavy set against Jacksonville.
Week 5 against Jacksonville
The Bills said so long to their basic sub-package four-man look, and instead unveiled a new four-man look featuring Troup and Williams at defensive tackle, with Edwards and Stroud at defensive end. Carrington and Spencer Johnson rotated in at end and tackle, respectively. Kelsay, who spent most of Week 3 with his hand in the dirt, saw extensive action as a stand-up outside linebacker in this 4-3 look, with Andra Davis the "middle" linebacker, and Posluszny an "outside" linebacker (though, from a terminology and technique standpoint, he was still an inside linebacker).
Nothing major changed from an expectations standpoint. The ends, and Kelsay, were expected to set the edge. The tackles (with the exception of the one-gap Williams) and an end were to try to keep Davis and Posluszny clean. The defensive scheme didn't change much; it's just the personnel that saw a rather radical shift philosophically.
Not much changed from a run-stuffing standpoint, either. In fact, you could argue things got worse.
Buffalo did improve in terms of the number of runs allowed that gained four or more yards, as 20 of the Jaguars' 40 rushes fit that description. That's a 10% improvement in one attempt, but really, should the team be rewarding a defense that allows 50% of runs to gain four or more yards with more game action? Won't teams figure out how to beat this defense, too?
Here's another fact worth considering: Jaguars rushes by non-running backs (meaning Mike Thomas and David Garrard) gained 62 yards on six carries. Go figure - when you get bigger and slower in your front seven, teams will have a lot more success getting to the edge and ripping off big chunks of yardage on the ground. In fairness, the Bills weren't great in that area in New England, either, as tight end Aaron Hernandez (!) ripped off a 13-yard run to spearhead a seven-rush, 25-yard effort from New England's non-running backs - a group that included Brady, Hernandez, Brandon Tate and Julian Edelman.
It's fair, we suppose, to give the defense another shot against a team purporting to be a physical, run-first outfit like Baltimore - if only to see if they can shave another 10% off of their over-four-yard total. But at what point does trying, and failing with, an experimental defense become detrimental to the implementation of the defensive scheme you actually want to run?
We talked about the fact that the scheme didn't really change, but let's face it - Spencer Johnson isn't going to be setting the edge in an OLB role for us in any sort of future worth watching. If the Bills want to continue to use their heavy set early in games, so be it - NFL coaches are, after all, still trying to win football games. But if a contest is out of hand, it would be ridiculous if the team did not revert back to its base 3-4, with actual linebackers playing outside linebacker, and with young players playing the techniques they'll be playing over the long haul. When a team is re-building, particularly in year one of a new regime, the first year should be a "scheme" year - get your systems in and run them into the ground. Get your players deeply immersed into the terminology, into the execution, and to improving each week within that scheme. Experimentation is fine, but it seems rather pointless when it's not working.
But maybe that's just us.
81 comments
|
7 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
what are the biggest issues? is it assignment or players? I would obviously assume it’s both but is one more glaring than the other?
as far as experimentation – I don’t think it’s that big of a deal – these guys said that they would try and fit the scheme to the players and are doing that. Coupled with most of these guys probably not being here in the long run and i’m not sure how much that matters – but it does matter to troup, carrington, poz and the DBs
Jokes are funny - The Bills are funny
Honestly, no. Both assignments and players are equally crap.
by Brian Galliford on Oct 20, 2010 11:06 AM EDT up reply actions
I think the craps is weighted decidedly toward the players
The Chan Plan – I believe in cutting, trading, or releasing my starters….and if they really suck, sign them to an extension.
The NIx plan - "We've got to dig our way out"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0VjPNKc0VsU
Bravo.
It’s time they stop trying to play cute and man up with the people they chose to go into battle with. What level of improvement can they expect out of players who aren’t even being asked to play the positions or the ways they were expected to play?
"Give back some of that money you ain't [expletive] earned!" - Eric Wood
Current song recommendation: R.E.M. - "Supernatural Superserious"
by TheAfghanTwilight on Oct 20, 2010 10:39 AM EDT reply actions
agreed
go with who you’ve got.
don’t try to be the williams wall if your williams is small
Catch-22.
If they are losing, we will find a reason to say what they are doing is wrong.
Fit the scheme to the players and we say they are not maximizing the learning transition to the 3-4.
Run the 3-4 and we say they are not fitting the scheme to the players.
Lose-Lose. Of course, if they win these vivisections go away for a week. So for now they should just be trying to figure out how to play defense. In the back-half of the season you get lots of time to get guys reps.
As much as we say they should totally throw in the towel on trying to win. I don’t think thats realistic advice for a coach who wants to retain credibility with his players or his owner (and most of the fans who don’t think that way).
by greysquirrel on Oct 20, 2010 10:54 AM EDT up reply actions
Run the 3-4 and we say they are not fitting the scheme to the players.
Speak for yourself, hombre. :)
by Brian Galliford on Oct 20, 2010 11:07 AM EDT up reply actions
Just run the dang 3-4
Didn’t you make the change to this scheme Chan? They need to play it a lot more and start getting these guys more reps in it, even if those guys might only be placeholders. Plop Troup down in the middle, give Williams reps on the outside, let Carrington play, get Stroud off the field, play the young OLB’s even though they’ll struggle and just see what these guys can offer.
If you want to run a 3-4, Chan, then start running it more. Nobody is being helped by running all this 3-4, except for opposing RB’s…
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Oct 20, 2010 10:54 AM EDT via mobile reply actions 1 recs
So you want them to experiment, just a different experiment.
by greysquirrel on Oct 20, 2010 11:00 AM EDT up reply actions
IMO, he wants to get our young players valuable experience in this coaching staff's preferred base defense
Is it admitting the season is lost…..yes, but I think we all know that already.
The Chan Plan – I believe in cutting, trading, or releasing my starters….and if they really suck, sign them to an extension.
The NIx plan - "We've got to dig our way out"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0VjPNKc0VsU
And getting them experience while the ironing-out period is a better fit: while they’re not truly competitive and in danger of throwing away a chance at a deep playoff run.
"Give back some of that money you ain't [expletive] earned!" - Eric Wood
Current song recommendation: R.E.M. - "Supernatural Superserious"
by TheAfghanTwilight on Oct 20, 2010 11:23 AM EDT up reply actions
I agree we should run the 3-4 more
This team is so talentless, why bother trying to fix something that can’t be fixed this season? Get the young guys to learn how to play the position we want them to play. Hopefully in 5 years we will have enough people with knowledge and perhaps a shred of talent, we can get back to our glorious 7-9 seasons.
Is this your homework, Larry?
by Schooled You on Oct 20, 2010 11:24 AM EDT up reply actions
The question begs: If they don’t have the talent to begin with, will any amount of experience ever pay off?
"Give back some of that money you ain't [expletive] earned!" - Eric Wood
Current song recommendation: R.E.M. - "Supernatural Superserious"
by TheAfghanTwilight on Oct 20, 2010 11:27 AM EDT up reply actions
I can only hope they help to teach future draft classes that have talent, how to philosophically play the positition.
This is just so depressing….
Is this your homework, Larry?
by Schooled You on Oct 20, 2010 11:29 AM EDT up reply actions
we have to assume that there are a few players who will benefit from the experience
even if ultimately they are going to be backups
The Chan Plan – I believe in cutting, trading, or releasing my starters….and if they really suck, sign them to an extension.
The NIx plan - "We've got to dig our way out"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0VjPNKc0VsU
I still have hope for
Troup, Carrington, Moats and Coleman… everyone else, I’ve seen all I need to see.
Is this your homework, Larry?
by Schooled You on Oct 20, 2010 11:36 AM EDT up reply actions
The Patriots win championships with backups in many areas. That team just gets it done right, developing lesser-known/scouted talent.
They’re a team able to find players who fit their plans and schemes well enough so that if a Welker goes down, then Julian Edleman can step in. Now they seem to have found their replacement for Faulk in Woodhead.
The Bills would be leagues ahead of their current selves if they could only follow some of the same methods and reap the same success that team has with some of their player development.
That’s without even stating how great it would be to have a QB like you-know-who.
"Give back some of that money you ain't [expletive] earned!" - Eric Wood
Current song recommendation: R.E.M. - "Supernatural Superserious"
by TheAfghanTwilight on Oct 20, 2010 11:42 AM EDT up reply actions
and a HC like that other you know who
The Chan Plan – I believe in cutting, trading, or releasing my starters….and if they really suck, sign them to an extension.
The NIx plan - "We've got to dig our way out"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0VjPNKc0VsU
I think people likely hate when I praise him, but the man deserves it…at least in my eyes. He’s ruthless and vindictive, but he gets results and his players respect and fear him enough to lay it on the line when the whistle blows.
I do hate how he put Brady in during that 56-17 thrashing, the game where Cassel when in, threw a pick with around 12 min to go. Yeah, putting Brady back in was absolutely necessary!
Anyway…
Let’s hear it for a defense that doesn’t know who or what they are, other than trampled over.
"Give back some of that money you ain't [expletive] earned!" - Eric Wood
Current song recommendation: R.E.M. - "Supernatural Superserious"
by TheAfghanTwilight on Oct 20, 2010 11:47 AM EDT up reply actions
Drafts and Trades
It starts with with good acquisitions….drafts and trades. N.E. knows how to spot and aquire them, obviously the Bills do not. Sadly look at our drafts over the years; bust over bust!
No
I want the team to run the scheme they have supposedly been building with in terms of draftees and their free agents. What good is running a 4-3? Its not like its successful…
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Oct 20, 2010 2:14 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
It's not a 4-3 though
They are still playing the same responsibilities as a 3-4, just with one of the OLB’s putting their hand down. Yes that OLB is not who would be on the field in normal packages, but that doesn’t affect everyone else. Troup, Carrington and Stroud are still playing two gap.
Why is it wrong to try and fix something that is not working with our current personnel? How much will these young guys learn getting run on 35-40 times a game at 4-5 yards a pop? I guess they will learn how to pick themselves up and dust themselves off.
Well, that experiment
was Gailey’s first choice of defense. He was very clear from day one that it’s the worst defense to gameplan as a OC because you it’s difficult to disguise where the pressure is coming from.
This is a year for evaluation, well they should evaluate right now what players fit the system, otherwise, they will be wasting an important year to know what you really have, roster wise.
This Disgusts Me.
time with Keith Ellison and Bryan Scott on the field in traditional linebacker roles
This sums up the Buffalo Bills inability to win football games.
Why on earth would you have the fastest lineman on the team at DT, why not put Edwards and Williams and Carrington at End and Have Troup Stroud and Johnson inside Im ok with going with the heavy set actually i think it will work if done properly do not put a gap rusher at DT to stop the run you put hole cloggers at DT and leave the gap shooting to the ends. George Edwards seems like hes lost and maybe this D.C job with very little talent is not best suited for him.
"Big Gulps Eh, Well See ya later" - Lloyd Christmas
" You Gus ready To Let The Dogs Out" "What?" " you Know, Who Let the dogs out rough rough rogh rough" - Zack Galifinakis - The Hangover
by PaullyPforPrez on Oct 20, 2010 12:22 PM EDT up reply actions
Ding ding ding....we have a winner...rec'd
The Chan Plan – I believe in cutting, trading, or releasing my starters….and if they really suck, sign them to an extension.
The NIx plan - "We've got to dig our way out"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0VjPNKc0VsU
repley fail....was meant for K
The Chan Plan – I believe in cutting, trading, or releasing my starters….and if they really suck, sign them to an extension.
The NIx plan - "We've got to dig our way out"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0VjPNKc0VsU
Dude, I was SO excited to get a Joe rec. Dream crushed. :(
by Brian Galliford on Oct 20, 2010 11:07 AM EDT up reply actions
Fear not...it is coming.....I wanted to make a few points but I keep getting distracted by my job :-)
The Chan Plan – I believe in cutting, trading, or releasing my starters….and if they really suck, sign them to an extension.
The NIx plan - "We've got to dig our way out"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0VjPNKc0VsU
Short version......I love this article....best thing I have read here in a long time...rec'd
The Chan Plan – I believe in cutting, trading, or releasing my starters….and if they really suck, sign them to an extension.
The NIx plan - "We've got to dig our way out"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0VjPNKc0VsU
I rec’d it almost as quick as Ko Simpson’s dreams of being a millionaire being thrown out that car window.
"Give back some of that money you ain't [expletive] earned!" - Eric Wood
Current song recommendation: R.E.M. - "Supernatural Superserious"
by TheAfghanTwilight on Oct 20, 2010 11:25 AM EDT up reply actions
don't be to hard on yourself....nobody is that fast :-)
The Chan Plan – I believe in cutting, trading, or releasing my starters….and if they really suck, sign them to an extension.
The NIx plan - "We've got to dig our way out"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0VjPNKc0VsU
Nevermind how quick I hit post, thus neglecting how much of a trainwreck that sentence truly is.
"Give back some of that money you ain't [expletive] earned!" - Eric Wood
Current song recommendation: R.E.M. - "Supernatural Superserious"
by TheAfghanTwilight on Oct 20, 2010 11:35 AM EDT up reply actions
Experimentation is fine, but it seems rather pointless when it’s not working.
How can I know if an experiment works without experimenting?
Sure ex post I can say, that wasn’t great. But ex ante I don’t know if my experiment is a good idea or a bad idea. Thats the whole point.
Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.
by greysquirrel on Oct 20, 2010 11:01 AM EDT up reply actions
in this case, that is ruling out the players ability to get better or inserting better players in the future
The Chan Plan – I believe in cutting, trading, or releasing my starters….and if they really suck, sign them to an extension.
The NIx plan - "We've got to dig our way out"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0VjPNKc0VsU
Not ruling it out, but the outcome is some combination of both for at least a few years.
by greysquirrel on Oct 20, 2010 11:10 AM EDT up reply actions
A fool is one who does not learn from his past mistakes
And repeats them!! REC!!
One for you too Brian!! REC!!
2010 - "Chan"ge is finally here......
Bingo
Players know when something isn’t working too. If the coaches blindly went on with what wasn’t working then these guys would lose faith in their coaches to put them in positions to succeed. I know I would.
Donkeys leading Lions
I completely agree with the idea that we must go with a 3-4 defense and stick with it.
He’ll I’d even be happy cutting veterans and signing guys off the practise squad if it means the guys we will retain actually learn and become comfortable with the alignment.
Unless injured, Carrington, Edwards, K Williams and Troup MUST start all the remaining games. We might want to see if Williams can play a little DE but that’s it.
As for OLB, I was disappointed that Ellis got cut. But personally I would shove Moats, Maybin and Coleman in and say GO FOR IT. The way we are currently playing we will finish 0-16 so if the young guys help us win a couple of games, good for them. When we are told Maybin is a liability against the run, he seems to have that in common with the rest of the damn team – as Torbor won’t get better, why the hell are we playing him?
The problem is we have a GM who’s been overpromoted, a HC who is the offensive equivalent of Jauron and a DC who appears clueless and incapable. It’s a pity that Wilson will not tear it all up, make Eric de Costa of the Ravens our GM, Jim Harbaugh HC/OC and Vic Fangio DC. Then there might be some hope
I completely agree with the idea that we must go with a 3-4 defense and stick with it.
Unless injured, Carrington, Edwards, K Williams and Troup MUST start all the remaining games.
These statements contradict one another.
by Brian Galliford on Oct 20, 2010 11:21 AM EDT up reply actions
But I think the larger point is fair – identify your future core players, or players that could be part of the core, and get them significant playing time.
Well, I think Brian meant that not all four guys could start in a 3-4 base look. Williams and Troup wouldn’t both be on the field at the same time.
"Give back some of that money you ain't [expletive] earned!" - Eric Wood
Current song recommendation: R.E.M. - "Supernatural Superserious"
by TheAfghanTwilight on Oct 20, 2010 11:39 AM EDT up reply actions
Play Troup much, much more. Williams is not occupying blockers (shooting gaps too much) which is one of the reasons Poz is getting washed out. Play the man you said you wanted to be our NT!
May God have mercy upon the opponents of the Buffalo Bills because WE WILL NOT!!!
by TexasBillsFanatic on Oct 20, 2010 11:43 AM EDT up reply actions
Right. I think we all knew that Kyle Williams was clearly not well-suited to play a traditional 3-4 NT role. He’s someone you want to get on the field, because he just makes things happen. It’s hard, but his talent seems wasted in the 3-4.
"Give back some of that money you ain't [expletive] earned!" - Eric Wood
Current song recommendation: R.E.M. - "Supernatural Superserious"
by TheAfghanTwilight on Oct 20, 2010 11:50 AM EDT up reply actions
It’s hard, but his talent seems wasted
Joe, I beat you to this one.
What we call our despair is often only the painful eagerness of unfed hope.
oopps
TWSS
What we call our despair is often only the painful eagerness of unfed hope.
LOL.....TWSS fail
The Chan Plan – I believe in cutting, trading, or releasing my starters….and if they really suck, sign them to an extension.
The NIx plan - "We've got to dig our way out"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0VjPNKc0VsU
Sometimes it really IS hard to championship the TWSS.
"Give back some of that money you ain't [expletive] earned!" - Eric Wood
Current song recommendation: R.E.M. - "Supernatural Superserious"
by TheAfghanTwilight on Oct 20, 2010 12:07 PM EDT up reply actions
*champion
"Give back some of that money you ain't [expletive] earned!" - Eric Wood
Current song recommendation: R.E.M. - "Supernatural Superserious"
by TheAfghanTwilight on Oct 20, 2010 12:07 PM EDT up reply actions
and don't feel bad....just kidding around
just thought it was funny you forgot the TWSS :-)
The Chan Plan – I believe in cutting, trading, or releasing my starters….and if they really suck, sign them to an extension.
The NIx plan - "We've got to dig our way out"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0VjPNKc0VsU
And the “denouement” is now complete:
and don’t feel bad….just kidding around
TWSS
"Give back some of that money you ain't [expletive] earned!" - Eric Wood
Current song recommendation: R.E.M. - "Supernatural Superserious"
by TheAfghanTwilight on Oct 20, 2010 12:49 PM EDT up reply actions
I would still like to see Williams at DE in the 3-4, especially on passing downs
but yeah, he is most likely wasted in this defense.
The Chan Plan – I believe in cutting, trading, or releasing my starters….and if they really suck, sign them to an extension.
The NIx plan - "We've got to dig our way out"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0VjPNKc0VsU
I wouldn’t hate seeing how he does from the DE position. He’s a unique sort of player, at least for this defense.
"Give back some of that money you ain't [expletive] earned!" - Eric Wood
Current song recommendation: R.E.M. - "Supernatural Superserious"
by TheAfghanTwilight on Oct 20, 2010 12:09 PM EDT up reply actions
I don’t like Williams at DE at all, because he just doesn’t have the mobility of Edwards or even Stroud. He’s best left inside.
by Brian Galliford on Oct 20, 2010 2:36 PM EDT up reply actions
What if they list him as a DE but play him at NT.....you know....kind of like Maybin :-)
The Chan Plan – I believe in cutting, trading, or releasing my starters….and if they really suck, sign them to an extension.
The NIx plan - "We've got to dig our way out"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0VjPNKc0VsU
That sort of makes it sound like Williams is doing something wrong, though. He’s not. He’s being asked to shoot gaps.
by Brian Galliford on Oct 20, 2010 2:35 PM EDT up reply actions
What I meant was
We consider Carrington and Edwards as 3-4 DE
Troup as a 3-4 NT
Kyle Williams as a 3-4 NT, but occasionally seeing some time at 3-4 DE, to spell Carrington or Edwards so the line up can be these
Carrington – Williams – Edwards
Carrington – Troup – Edwards
Williams – Troup – Edwards
Carrington – Troup – Williams
Each guy will be on the field for 75% of the snaps.
Reality check
Buffalo is in year one of the rebuild.
When Dallas went through their year one rebuild in 1989, they went 1-15. There were tons of question marks about Jimmy Johnson being a successful college coach that couldn’t make it in the NFL, if Jerry Jones was too into the day-to-day running of the team, and a lot of folks wondering why they drafted Aikman only to draft Steve Walsh in the supplemental draft.
Sometimes you don’t realize what you have, and judgment is best passed after a little time has gone by. Not saying that guys like de Costa, Harbaugh, and Fangio aren’t upgrades, but I don’t think anyone can say that Nix, Gailey, and Edwards are utter failures until we see there work over time. Time = about 2 years worth of work. Five games is just a bit too small a sample size.
Starting the official Buffalo "Draft Owen Marecic in 2011" campaign.
Indecision
But they can’t seem to know what direction that rebuild will go.
Nix spends the first two months about the need to protect the QB and then wait until R5 to take won, grabbing a RB when we already have two 1,000yds runners.
We then say we’re switching to a 3-4 defense, draft players to fit that alignment but then seen unable to roll the dice and apply it properly.
Are Nix/Gailey simply a new version of Donahoe/Williams, 3 years of messing around with no result?
The problem is unlike teams who are not patient enough as a team we are far too patient.
After all Paul Allen didn’t wait 3 years to pull out of the Jim Mora Jr experiment
It's not indecision
Spiller was the BPA. They didn’t like Davis at OT and it was too high for Bulaga. The Spiller pick was far from indecision. BTW, there’s a ton of merit in having a Spiller-type back. Have you checked out the Saints’ offense lately? Reggie Bush goes down, and now all the passing lanes are clogged. I’m OK with the pick despite it violating my own personal draft rules; and it was BPA, not indecision.
Lynch was shopped, through and through. Nix could have got a 4th round pick on draft day. He got more than that by waiting.
The 3-4 isn’t working because it isn’t being applied properly. There are exactly 4 scheme fits on the team: Troup, Carrington, Davis, and Edwards. Two are rookies. Posluszny and Maybin are potential scheme fits. Stroud, Johnson, Williams, and Kelsay aren’t scheme fits.
The argument that we should stick to the scheme and try to make it work is ridiculous. If Gailey and Edwards did that, everyone on this board would be crying that they aren’t trying anything new to stop the run.
Bottom line is that Buffalo needs 2 OLB’s, a two-gap NT, and a 5 technique DE to run the scheme. Troup, Carrington, and Maybin could fill those roles. So it’s going to take patience, since the players that fit the scheme are young and inexperienced.
Starting the official Buffalo "Draft Owen Marecic in 2011" campaign.
by Der Jaeger on Oct 20, 2010 2:34 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Experimentation is fine, but it seems rather pointless when it’s not working.
TWSS :-)
The Chan Plan – I believe in cutting, trading, or releasing my starters….and if they really suck, sign them to an extension.
The NIx plan - "We've got to dig our way out"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0VjPNKc0VsU
I left it alone. I don’t know that experimentation is always fine, though. =)
"Give back some of that money you ain't [expletive] earned!" - Eric Wood
Current song recommendation: R.E.M. - "Supernatural Superserious"
by TheAfghanTwilight on Oct 20, 2010 11:51 AM EDT up reply actions
yeah......"always" would be stretching it....and....well.....better leave the rest alone :-)
The Chan Plan – I believe in cutting, trading, or releasing my starters….and if they really suck, sign them to an extension.
The NIx plan - "We've got to dig our way out"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0VjPNKc0VsU
Heh. Why do I have to be at work? I’m cracking up right now.
"Give back some of that money you ain't [expletive] earned!" - Eric Wood
Current song recommendation: R.E.M. - "Supernatural Superserious"
by TheAfghanTwilight on Oct 20, 2010 12:08 PM EDT up reply actions
I hear you.....I have to learn to LOL inside my head or I am going to get busted
The Chan Plan – I believe in cutting, trading, or releasing my starters….and if they really suck, sign them to an extension.
The NIx plan - "We've got to dig our way out"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0VjPNKc0VsU
I don’t know that experimentation is always fine, though
see george costanza and jerry’s move,
There's not a wide receiver who is fast enough, that J.P. Losman can't overthrow him on a fly pattern.
by The Buffalo Kid on Oct 20, 2010 2:47 PM EDT up reply actions
This is definately a dire situation.
Remember when a team rebuilds, it is evaluating every aspect of the game. Offense, defense, special teams, coaching and organization personnel. We didn’t care to much about the defensive side of the ball in preseason, alot of our unanswered concerns were on the offensive side. QB, LT, RT, WR, TE and weather or not Eric Wood would be healthy enough to play. Yes there were other concerns we discussed, such as strength and conditioning and no TVs in the training room. Honestly, the defense got little attention because we really didn’t know what to expect. Leave it to Bellichek to expose that weakness.
Since the second game of the season, our offense has progressed, meaning it is not the same as it was. We are scoring 20 points a game, Steve Johnson is finding the end-zone on more than one occasion, Wood and Bell are playing and are gaining the “let the young guys play” experience and they are not killing us. There is still room for improvement but it is only week 7. Shawn Nelson contribution would be nice, alot of smoke blown his way by us rumble-rs, time has come for him to put up or for us to shut up. I feel confident going forward with the offense. There is a sense of urgency to get the run game in gear and considering all the new coaches on that side of the ball, they are moving in the right direction. Sure there will be set backs, but let’s hope not to many. Also, lets not forget all the young O-Lineman we have brought in. Howard, Urbik, Wrotto and a new PS player just last week. All guards mind you, but some may have to spit time at tackle to stick.
finally, the defense. Same problem only worse than last year. Last season the run defense was sad, but we had a secondary that could pick you clean. We also, had numerous injuries to excuse our way to the next game. This season is definitely different. The most experienced part of our coaching staff is on the defensive side of the ball and that was supposed to be a strong point. Kelsay is not our problem on defense until he is expected to man up on a TE. But go on and blame him for everything. We have a very diverse group on defense. Many of our veterans are 4-3 players mixed with FA’s that come from or have had extensive experience in 3-4 schemes. Then we have this years draft that really haven’t contributed much. This area is our “obvious” biggest concern. It is just possible that the plan is to mix and match and allow these younger players like Moats, Coleman and maybe even Maybin to find ways to step in and contribute. Troup and Carrington as well. The plan could be to resolve this issue by mid-season and allow it to grow just like we are doing with the offense. We want to win and want a win soon, we just might be ahead of ourselves too much. I am building reservations about Edwards as DC, I do expect him to turn this around, with Chris Kelsay in his plans. If not then I wouldn’t shed one tear seeing him leave as fast as he was hired.
YOU ARE OUT of you kuku fufu mine craker laker Flaber baber FUNKI chunki brain. WE want to winn every year -- abayarde
Agree but disagree
I almost favour what seems to be the Jacksonville model in the draft – draft big on one side of the ball in one draft, and then go the opposite way the following year. Certainly at 3-3 they are better placed than us.
I agree with Wood getting playing time, and feel Levitre is doing well. Demetrius Bell however is simply not a starting quality LT in this league and needs upgrading before we can even think of spending $80m on a QB.
We draft four players for the 3-4 defense and discounting the injured Batten, have seemed reluctant to play any of them. We’ve signed Davis and Edwards and now are trying to get 3-4 players to play in a 4-3 alignment. It is truly clueless.
In the 2011 draft I would use Day1 and Day2 on the offensive side of the ball with Day3 focusing on the defense, unless a talented guy slides. Get the offensive guys on the field and playing.
In the 2012 draft, I would do the reverse. Day 1 and Day 2 on defense – OLBs if Moats, Maybin and Batten having struck gold, DE to provide depth to the rotation and/or NT to rotate with the increasingly seasoned Troup. Day 3 to spend on offensive guys like RB depth as Jackson gets older, WR/TE talent.
Maybe we might get to the post season by the end of the 2012 season?
I think restricting oneself to a particular unit on a day or on a particular draft is ridiculous. I have no idea why we would want to do that.
by greysquirrel on Oct 20, 2010 4:05 PM EDT up reply actions
I feel the same way, as much as people seem shocked by how bad the offense started or the Edwards experiment, they appear to be self-correcting and improving. Meanwhile, the defense is in free-fall. As odd as it sounds, it might take longer to get the defense up to acceptable play than the offense.
by greysquirrel on Oct 20, 2010 4:10 PM EDT up reply actions
Whatever D they run
I want to see movement. Blitzes, twists, stunts, pre-snap shifting. All I see are guys standing around not doing anything until they react. All the top ten D’s do all of these things, almost every play. Some have said Bills players lack speed to do these things. I don’t believe that is the root problem. Sure it would help. But, for example, NE for many years lacked “speed” guys in their LB corps yet still managed to get turnovers & crucial stops.
Pressure & confusion/uncertainty causes offenses to screw up, & these aspects of the Bills D are sorely lacking. If the other teams offense always know the OLB’s are always outside the DE’s etc, then their gameplanning is easier & will succeed.
Hutch-Tech Alumnus Bicentennial Class of '76
Buffalo born & bred. Bills fan since 1968.
by MtJulietTNBillsFan on Oct 20, 2010 2:42 PM EDT reply actions
Does anyone else think kelsay goes back to defensive end and stroud goes to the bench as soon as someone else can play outside linebacker. Hes not stronger but im pretty sure hes faster and could get up the field faster. I think hes just keeping the linebacker spot untill someone that can cover at least a little emerges or is brought in next year.
Not a bad thought, honestly. I can’t figure anything about this team out, so it wouldn’t surprise me. Maybin really needs to figure the game out.
"Give back some of that money you ain't [expletive] earned!" - Eric Wood
Current song recommendation: R.E.M. - "Supernatural Superserious"
by TheAfghanTwilight on Oct 20, 2010 6:15 PM EDT up reply actions
He could easily go back to d end and its nice to have backups at linebacker going into the long term future. Plus his contract would be pretty cheap compared to other defensive ends wouldnt it. It makes sense to me. When the bills said they where switching to a 3-4. We should have excpected that some players would have to try to do things they arent really capable of. Maybe one or two of these guys will still be here in two or three years. None of them are suited for 3-4 assignments. Even the corners seem better suited to playing zone coverage. Thats the way the team was built in the past Its going to be ugly for awhile. Untill the dbs can play a ton of man. The linebackers can blitz and cover well, and the lineman can eat up blocks. The guys on this defense just arent built for that. So I think thats why kelsay is at olb for now. He was the only choice besides a rookie or ghosts of the past. He propably could be a pretty decent end in this scheme. Maybe in a few years thats what hel be doing.
The 3-4 lives and dies @ NT
If the coaches are committed to the 3-4 then piece #1 is having an absolute beast at NT. That guy HAS to occupy the center and a guard in run situations and be able to cave in the pocket in passing downs. If Troup can’t do that, then we are kidding ourselves trying to run this D. We don’t have the personnel at LB that ‘s for sure, but running the 3-4 so far is making a bad D look even worse. Troup has to get 70% of the reps at NT and if he ain’t cutting it, then time to re-think the 3-4.
by AlwaysaBillinPhilly on Oct 20, 2010 5:48 PM EDT reply actions
Draft Class 2010 disappointing
Ok, so we are supposed to be patient with the 2010 draft class…but only see them doing spot duty contributions…We see that the decision has been made to extend Kelsay for the next 3 years as an OLB …we also see that they may have “reached” when they selected Troup 2nd round as he cant get on the field…Same with Maybin in the 1st round…we see that they are getting rid of the 3-4 in favor of the 4-3…and we are being told to be patient…3 yrs rebuild predicted…i seriously need to ask where is the accountability? This FO is asking a lot from the fans and doing very little to get their trust…this is just the defensive side of the ball…In my opinion we need to play the young guys as they are the future of this organization and see what they are worth…we have all these old FA’s that are out there not doing spit…Also want to add I have seen complaints regarding Poz…he may be the only playmaker in our front 7, possilby Edwards too….but Poz is forced to chase plays down from inside…where is the OLB’s???? Better question, if Poz can chase a play down from inside…why can’t our Olb’s chase a play down on the outside? Shouldnt our OLB’s have speed to cover the outside as well as cover the pass?
2010 Draft Class
Don’t you think its a wee bit early to call this class disappointing? As far as accountability, have you been a fan a while? Thats a problem going waaayy back.
Home Of The Never Ending Rebuild (15years and counting)
too long a fan...
Probly the first season i remember was 1983…remember watching Joe Cribbs and Joe Ferguson at Training camp…and Jerry Butler asking my sister on a date…but you are right…I wasn’t watching the team in the 70’s…have i been a fan a while? Who jumps on the bills band wagon??? and I didnt call this class disappointing bc the players are bad necessarily…i am disappointed bc they can’t get on the field…and the older slower players are in front of them on the roster…I want to see them play so we can develop, evaluate, and know what we have…so we are not asking so many questions next year…
Hear Ya
Not really sure why rookie playing time has been so limited either. Didn’t mean to question your fandom. I’m just still waiting for rebuild thats been ongoing for about 10 years now, forget about this regime’s rebuild. Hoping Nix’s rebuild is actually for real, versus previous rebuilds. But yeah, been lacking accountability for sometime it seems!
Home Of The Never Ending Rebuild (15years and counting)
by buffalobacker on Oct 20, 2010 9:58 PM EDT up reply actions
Rec'd
Totally agree, great post
Act like a sober human being, not a drunk Internet username. -- Brian Galliford
by NorCal BillsFan on Oct 20, 2010 9:37 PM EDT via mobile reply actions

by 



































