Bills can't hand starting job to Trent Edwards
I'm fairly certain that I'm writing this piece tonight (which y'all will read early Tuesday morning) simply to save my Inbox the workload of dealing with reaction to this news. Yes, folks, I'm aware of the prevailing opinion - stemming from Mark Gaughan and Sal Maiorana of The Buffalo News - that Trent Edwards could emerge as new Buffalo Bills head coach Chan Gailey's starting quarterback of choice next season. I'm aware of the subsequent ProFootballTalk.com article "expanding" on the idea.
More importantly, I'm keenly aware of the type of reaction such a decision would elicit from a... distraught... fan base. Anyone want to volunteer their services as a moderator on this blog?
Edwards is one of the most despised players in recent Bills history. From the derogatory nicknames to the Weird Al-like song spoofs to the alarming decline in on-field production, Edwards deteriorated from one of the league's most promising young quarterbacks at the beginning of the 2008 season to just another name on a long list of failed quarterback experiments post-Jim Kelly in Western New York. So yeah, I get why the idea that some folks perceive the odds of Edwards starting next season as better than 50/50 might upset some fans. I'm with you, but not necessarily for the same reasons.
Why Edwards can't be handed the job
First and foremost, it should be noted that neither Gaughan nor Maiorana are saying that Buffalo won't address the quarterback position. Clearly, they're going to do their due diligence at the position. Buffalo's quarterbacks, collectively, were awful last season, just as they've been every year since Drew Bledsoe's first season in Orchard Park. Even if Gaughan and Maiorana are correct in that assessment, it doesn't mean the job will simply be handed to Edwards. That is critical.
Imagine, for a moment, that you're Aaron Schobel. You're contemplating retirement, and you hear that the team you've played for for nine years just re-named Edwards as the starting quarterback. The thoughts going through your mind likely are not pleasant.
Imagine that you're Terrell Owens. Or Terrence McGee, or Marcus Stroud, or any other vet looking to taste playoff action for the first time in a while (or ever, if you're McGee). Imagine that you're Lee Evans, who hasn't played with a good quarterback since his rookie season.
Buffalo's players are professionals. Heading into a new season under a new coaching staff, they'll put on happy faces and get behind most moves simply because they've got good first impressions to make. But the core of the team that quit on Edwards - that, in fact, preferred Ryan Fitzpatrick as its leader - well, those guys might not like the idea of Edwards simply getting the job back. They don't view him as a leader right now. Merely handing the job to Edwards "to see what we have in him" would be a disastrous start to Gailey's coaching tenure in Buffalo.
Organizational direction is the primary responsibility
Chan Gailey and GM Buddy Nix have one major responsibility in their first year on the job - to establish an organizational identity, both on and off the field, and to lay the foundation for future success. They've got a plan; whether or not they reach those goals is dependent on their abilities to execute the first part of that plan. Finding a quarterback is step one of that plan.
That might not be very easy to accomplish this year. With free agency rules changing, the pool of available veteran quarterbacks has dwindled to the point that Chad Pennington - he of a third right shoulder surgery just five months ago - is the only viable starting option. Other not-so-great names might pop up, with Michael Vick being the most-discussed in these parts.
The NFL Draft is weak on "franchise" quarterbacks this year, as well. Sam Bradford and Jimmy Clausen are widely considered the top options, but it's very possible both could be gone by the time the Bills' ninth overall pick rolls around. Talent drops off severely from that point; it's possible that this draft could yield zero quality NFL starters.
That all adds up to Gaughan's guesstimate being accurate - for now, at least. But it's imperative to hammer home the point that the job can't be handed to Edwards. Again, Gailey's most important job this year is to lay a foundation, create an identity and get the team to progress throughout his first year on the job. He'll severely hamper his ability to meet even that expectation by handing the job to any quarterback - not just Edwards - that's not overtly qualified for the job.
Moving back toward competition?
Buffalo has a problem with handing things out at the game's most critical position. J.P. Losman was given the starting job far too early simply to get Bledsoe out of town. The team turned to Edwards far too early, as well, after Losman suffered an injury in Week 3 of 2007. Handing things out at quarterback reeks of desperation, shows a lack of commitment to a plan (and to players), and does more damage to a team's overall outlook than it helps. In short, the Bills have gambled on young guys, and to say it hasn't paid off would be an understatement of epic proportions.
If Buffalo can't land a clear-cut starting quarterback - and in my mind, there are only two or three legitimate options that fit that category in the first place - then they need to settle for a full-blown quarterback competition. I'm not talking about a Losman versus Holcomb competition; that wasn't really a competition, as the Dick Jauron regime was going to go with Losman regardless, to find out what they had in the young player. We don't need no stinking stacked quarterback competitions. I'm talking about three guys, equal reps, equal pre-season playing time, and may the best man win.
If Edwards emerges from that situation with the starter's role... well, the fans probably won't be thrilled, but it would at least appease the players. One last time - foundation, identity and progress are essentials to year one of the Nix/Gailey (sorry, Ron, I refuse to use 'Chix') regime. Nothing can be handed out. The quarterback position is not a piece of candy. It's one of the 32 most important jobs in the NFL, and who the team starts at that position has to be decided in very specific ways.
I'd love to hear your thoughts on this one, folks: would you accept Edwards as the team's starter from any situation other than the winner of a fair, balanced competition?
263 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Please note I have not yet read this article ....
But this is what I just posted in the links article from yesterday:
RE: Edwards starting this year
I must admit that if I were running the Bills, I would also strongly consider Trent Edwards for starter this year. Just no need to deal any type of compensation for a similar type player (Thigpen, T. Jackson, J. Campbell) and since we are not going to the playoffs anytime soon, no need to deal anything for a good QB (McNabb, Pennington).
BUT: I would also draft the franchise QB this year. Identify the 1 QB from this draft class that you feel will be the best (for me, that’s Bradford, but also wouln’t mind Clausin), and then do whatever you have to do to make sure you get him in the draft.
Have the prospect sit for at least a year, maybe 2, while Edwards either: 1.) stands there and takes the beatings or 2.) becomes a semi-decent QB again. Obviously, option #2 would be ideal…..
Bottom Line: If we are rebuilding, then do it right. Identify and draft the franchise QB as quickly as possible, because they take the longest to get good. Then, draft/acquire the offensive linemen. Don’t trade any draft picks for players unless they will still be contributing to the team in 5-6 years from now. And resign yourself to being terrible for the next 2 or so years. But know you are rebuilding the right way.
Thanks for elaborating.
YES WE CHAN!
Tweet
Your daily source for Buffalo Bills information.
by MattRichWarren on Feb 17, 2010 10:04 AM EST up reply actions
Ok. Here you go. The guy goes by the name Jimmy.
I mean really.
Jimmy.
It sounds like he’s a character from Seinfeld. “Hey, Jimmy’s gonna throw you a deep ball!…..Man, Jimmy feels great today!……Jimmy gonna go ballin!”
Does this Clausen kid talk to himself in the first person too? He just might..
Has there ever been a quarterback in the league that goes by a “immy” or a “anny”? Think about it. I know that Jim Kelly went by Jimbo occasionally. But it wasn’t his name coming out of college or growing up. I hate that I sound petty. But I do believe it screams of someone that may have been coddled his whole life.
And that is what bothers me. If we’re going to spend a high draft pick on a QB, I want a QB that is a leader. A leader of men I believe, is imperative to winning in a sport where grown men but their bodies on the line for each other in an effort to win. And I have an uncomfortable feeling that Jimmy, sounds like a pre-madonna with a strong arm and nothing else. So in that regard, McSham may have hit this one on the head with the Losman comment. Both were talented, strong armed QB’s that won nothing in college and worked on an emotional level with that of a 12 year old. “mmmm, yes think I, you have good idea” says JP…I mean Yoda.
Because seriously, if you were in Clausen’s spot, knowing that gaining respect from your peers is a very big part of your job description (aka, win football games), would you go by the name JImmy?
I mean really? Really?
How about Danny White, Tommy Maddox, Joey Harrington, or Johnny Unitas :-)
And I don’t even like Clausen that much. I just can agree he is a bad leader or a spoiled brat of some kind because he goes by Jimmy. You don’t know many Italians do you?
If we end up with Vick, T.O., Richie I., and Porter….that is really pushing the dbag density limit for one team.
whooops....can't agree....
If we end up with Vick, T.O., Richie I., and Porter….that is really pushing the dbag density limit for one team.
Please be joking.
Please. Please be joking.
Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott
by Brian Galliford on Feb 17, 2010 7:10 PM EST up reply actions
You guys are pretty serious here. I’m just trying to have a little fun. Isn’t that what this is all about?
In response to you Joe P., I am part Italian and half my family is ALL Italian. IAnd in my family, just like in high school, calling you by that nickname is a sign of endearment. I jest with Jimmy Clausen because I believe he is immature and may be emotional stunted – as a result from being coddled his entire life. It of course, has nothing to do with his name. However, his name MAY be an indication on how he was raised. No? It wouldn’t be any different than saying that a person is a flower child, just judging from their name.
I like your references though. Must have been pretty tough to find many if your digging up the likes of that cast:)
Hahhaha.....some are serious....me, not so much
I thought you were being serious. My bad. If we draft Clausen, I will call him Jack-Jack (from the Incredibles) :-)
If we end up with Vick, T.O., Richie I., and Porter….that is really pushing the dbag density limit for one team.
Cool. What are your thoughts on our QB picture? You got a QB in mind in the draft that you’d like to see here?
Bradford. Otherwise late round or UDFA longshot. Not a big clausen fan. I give him about a 50/50 bust possibility.
most of my posts get deleted :(
Yeah, Bradford seems to have all the tools. Ever watch LeFevour play? I can say that this is the first time i am more intrigued by a guy not considered the cream of graduating class, that I think is a bonifide future superstar.
By the way, I like your sig. I’m relatively new to this place. What gets your posts deleted?
Using bad words, political, or religious comments, general troll behavior, and making fun of Lost :-P
Just think somewhere between PG and PG-13 (no nudity) and you should be OK.
If we end up with Vick, T.O., Richie I., and Porter….that is really pushing the dbag density limit for one team.
Has there ever been a quarterback in the league that goes by a "immy" or a "anny"?
Not to lend anything to your argument but Johnny Unitas was pretty good.
YES WE CHAN!
Tweet
Your daily source for Buffalo Bills information.
by MattRichWarren on Feb 18, 2010 9:17 AM EST up reply actions
Don't forget Johnny Utah
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
Johnny Moxon? :-)
YES WE CHAN!
Tweet
Your daily source for Buffalo Bills information.
by MattRichWarren on Feb 18, 2010 8:09 PM EST up reply actions
Why not...
He was the most effective QB in terms of managing the game before he was forced to suit up behind one of if not the most inexperienced O-lines in the NFL. How much confidence would any QB have? Running for your life on every passing play doesn’t seem like a huge booster. That being said, a new QB needs to be brought in just for the sake of saving face and adding somewhat of a QB competition. Neither Vick nor Pennington would add much to that, but it will ease the fans minds. Remember Brohm was cut by the Packers, then re-signed to the practice squad. Fitzpatrick wont lead us to the playoffs. Edwards might have been more successful if One Bills Drive would of paid Jason Peters. Im just happy that Buddy, who resides in my town of Chattanooga TN, said that he wants to pay to keep the talent the Bills currently have in Buffalo. Look around the league at some of the superstars that Buffalo let walk. Thats why we havent been to the playoffs for a decade.
I gotta disagree Brian. It just doesn't matter who QB's the Bills the next 2 years
Any type of free agent solution to this problem is not going to get the Bills to the Super Bowl. The only QB who is going to potentially get the Bills to the Super Bowl is still in college, or leaving college this year.
As such, you identify the next great NFL quarterback and draft him. Be it this year, or next year. And once you identify him, you do whatever it takes to get him. That is the only way to win in the NFL these days (aside from the occasional exception of having a fantastic defense.)
RE: Players like Evans, Schoebel, Stroud, TO not liking Edwards as the starter…..I’m sorry, but changing an entire coaching staff screams rebuilding. They should know they are not shooting for the playoffs this year, or even next. Especially when changing the entire defensive scheme.
Bottom line: Do the rebuild the right way. Identify the next First Round (top 40 picks, so second round too) QB that is going to be a winner in this league (P. Manning, Rivers, Rothliesberger, E. Manning, Brees, Favre, etc) and get him anyway possible. Let him sit for at least a year, maybe two….and don’t spend any valuable draft picks on the QB we are “throwing to the wolves” in the meantime….
In fact, I feel so strongly about us sucking the next few years
but rebuilding the right way, that if I could have the Bills only practice the next few years and not play any games so we don’t suffer any major injuries, while adding draft picks and minor free agents, I would sign up for that!
by StroudFanClub on Feb 16, 2010 9:02 AM EST up reply actions
The idea that it doesn’t matter who plays quarterback for you is not only 100% fundamentally incorrect, it’s a little scary to even think about. The NFL is a quarterback’s league. Not only does it matter who’s back there, it’s by far and away the most critical factor in any given football organization.
I understand your point – that we have other areas that can be built while we wade through an undesirable year for available QB talent. I get that. But I think you’re taking it to an unhealthy extreme.
Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott
by Brian Galliford on Feb 16, 2010 9:52 AM EST up reply actions
It doesn't matter to me who plays QB the next 1-2 years
Because I don’t care if they finish 0-16 those years. What I care about is winning a Super Bowl sometime before I die.
In my opinion, we never let the rebuilding process totally play out the past decade, and look where we are? We tried to bandage up problems, and we ended up never really hitting rock bottom and starting over. Hence, we continued to win 7 games each year and draft 10th. I’m fine with losing for two years if that allows us to make the necessary changes and acquisitions of talent necessary (like a Francise QB).
San Diego hit rock bottom- then were able to draft Brees, and acquire Rivers
Indy hit rock bottom- bam, Peyton Manning
The Gaints were drafting top 4- bam, trade for Eli
Evalutate and identify the best QB, and go out and get him.
I just don’t want us to mortgage any part of the future for the sake of gaining a win or three this year.
Yes, I may be taking this to an unhealthy extreme, but that is the only way to get through to people sometimes.
by StroudFanClub on Feb 16, 2010 10:06 AM EST up reply actions
Ask yourself
if going 0-16 for two years straight is a healthy rebuilding process. A team needs to make positive steps to develop confidence and trust in each other and the coaching staff.
a.k.a. Undee
it was hyperbole – I get what he’s saying and I agree to a point. basically – build for a superbowl not for 2010 playoffs
Hello - thanks for reading my signature. It's very interesting. Bye
Thanks J2!
I always take comments literally until someone clever points out the applied literary mechanism. :-)
a.k.a. Undee
This is what I am trying to say:
Maybe due to my hyperbole, you missed my counterpoint: loosing games now doesn’t translate to a successful rebuild for the future.
Just because a team identifies a QB for their future and “goes and gets him” does not mean they have a sure thing. For all the Peyton’s and Rivers mentioned in this thread, there have been huge disappointments!
You don’t forget the present completely to gamble for the future. The Bills need to find the balance between the two extremes.
a.k.a. Undee
I am willing to sacrifice two years of my life watching terrible Bills football
If they will just commit to the rebuild and identify and draft a Franchise QB. You must admit, that is patience. That is thinking long term, no?
by StroudFanClub on Feb 16, 2010 10:08 AM EST up reply actions
yes, might as well
make it an even dozen!
"In wine there is wisdom, in beer there is strength, in water there is bacteria"
That’s where you and I agree. I’m willing to be patient, too. Where I disagree is that there has to be a concrete method to getting there, because a quick look around the NFL will show you that there’s no scientific method to building a good football team.
Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott
by Brian Galliford on Feb 16, 2010 10:10 AM EST up reply actions
So what do you make of the teams that made the playoffs this year?
P. Manning (Colts), M. Sanchez (Jets), J. Flacco (Ravens), B. Favre (Vikings), D. Brees (Saints), P. Rivers (Chargers), D. McNabb (Philly), A. Rodgers (Packers), C. Palmer (Bengals)….All drafted in the first 40 picks. (75%)
9 of the 12 QBs who started in the playoffs this year.
3 out of the final 4 QBs in the semi-finals (75%) were top 40 picks.
Both of the Super Bowl QBs were top 40 picks, (100%)
Statistically anamoly? Doesn’t that provide a blueprint to how to build a playoff team?
by StroudFanClub on Feb 16, 2010 10:19 AM EST up reply actions
Sanchez
I love the breakdown here however lets face it has a bills fan I know i hate Sanchez and the Jets protected the young QB in the playoffs thank god for a good run game and an amazing defense. Sanchez doesnt belong in this list….I know they made playoffs but the man got picked 5 times the man had a passer rating of 8.3.
by BillsStampede34 on Feb 16, 2010 10:30 AM EST up reply actions
Fine, then replace Sanchez with:
1st round pick Ben Roethlisberger (team went 9-7) or
1st round pick Matt Ryan (team went 9-7)
by StroudFanClub on Feb 16, 2010 10:33 AM EST up reply actions
I think exactly what you think. Like I said – we pretty much agree on everything.
I just think your statement that it “doesn’t matter” who plays quarterback is both inaccurate and extreme. That’s my biggest point of contention here.
Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott
by Brian Galliford on Feb 16, 2010 10:49 AM EST up reply actions
Fine, it doesn't matter *to me*. I'm sure it matters to most other people.
I know that saying “it doesn’t matter who QBs this team the next 2 years” is not really accurate, I’m sure it must matter somehow who QBs bad teams, but I don’t think the QB that will eventually lead the Bills to a Super Bowl is on the roster, available via free agency or trade, and thus, it doesn’t matter to me.
by StroudFanClub on Feb 16, 2010 10:55 AM EST up reply actions
I can agree with this part
As such, you identify the next great NFL quarterback and draft him. Be it this year, or next year. And once you identify him, you do whatever it takes to get him.
That’s the best way for this team to turn it around once and for all. We can’t expect some free agent signing or young vet we trade for to be our franchise QB. If the staff like Sam Bradford, they may need to make a Mark Sanchez-type trade up to get him. If they don’t like any of the QB’s this year, I want them to as much as they can to find multiple starters and build up a strong amount of team depth this year, and hopefully go hard after a franchise QB in next year’s draft.
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Feb 16, 2010 10:41 AM EST up reply actions 2 recs
1 million percent agree.
The identify part is key too. You can’t just know you need a QB and then throw a dart at one, or “hope” that the guy you like falls to you. You need to make sure of it, or else you get JP Losman being taken after Manning, Rivers, and a guy the Bills were rumored to really like, Rothleisberger. If they really liked him, they should have ensured they get him. Instead, they picked JP and we all know what happens next…..
Can I also float the opinion that I hope it is Sam Bradford that they are going to identify as their Franchise QB? I feel his drop from possible #1 overall pick last year to people questioning if he is an injury risk is the perfect opportunity for the Bills to get a Franchise QB a little “cheaper” than usual. Kinda like when injuries discounted Terrell Davis (but obviously not to that extent.)
by StroudFanClub on Feb 16, 2010 10:47 AM EST up reply actions
That's it in a nut shell. Thanks
If he is out there he will come. Of course we have to make it happen, go get the kid. If he is not out there then take care of the other areas with players that will be difference makers sooner rather than four years down the road. We have been clamoring for playmakers the last few years. Instead we have been drafting decent depth players and putting them in starting positions. QB is the biggest need but we need to stop forcing it to happen.
This is like dumping a new puzzle from it's box. Now let's start putting the peices together. I guess this is what we all asked for.
Brian, I think you'll be surprise at just how many people
actually won’t mind Edwards as starter. Sure, there will be the people who hate him because of last year, and I can see why they may hate him. But there are also alot of people who are ready to give Edwards one more chance….or at least hold the fort down until the next great NFL QB arrives and is trained.
It doesn't matter as much
what we think, it matters what the players think as Brian outlined. That is more critical at this point. When Edwards replaced Fitzpatrick you could see the let down from the players. When Fitzpatrick returned you could also see a resurgance in the players on the field. That in itself should put Edwards where he belongs.
This is like dumping a new puzzle from it's box. Now let's start putting the peices together. I guess this is what we all asked for.
how about if theres a qb shootout, the first one to lead us to a preseason victory gets it.
thaaaat was a joke.
new regime, we need new blood, rebuild mode do it all.
Another embrace
Fans recoiled when Nix was named, then embraced him. Same with Gailey, the “offensive-minded” QB savvy guy. Now, if they choose Edwards, will all the embrasive feelings continue? IMO, Edwards is the smart move. Pound for pound, I think he is as good as any vet we sign. We may yet sign one as insurance, competion whatever. I’ve said it before, build the house before buying the expensive furniture. Next year’s draft will be QB heaven compared to this. And, face it, we are rebuilding this year (again).
If Nix and Gailey are as good as advertised, and Gailey can work his purported majic, this move could save us draft picks, provide more needed new personnel, and, dare I say, maybe accelerate the rebuild? Put Edwards behind a “new and improved” line and get through the year. If he’s a bust (which I doubt), then no harm no foul…we weren’t going anywhere anyway. More importantly, we saved the picks to cover other needs.
Finally, they must see something (they’re paid to see) that many fans refuse to…there is some talent there. I, for one, welcome the idea. Now, I will duck behind something to avoid the “written bricks” to be hurled this way.
"In wine there is wisdom, in beer there is strength, in water there is bacteria"
by fansince60 on Feb 16, 2010 8:58 AM EST reply actions 8 recs
+ another
FS Jairus Byrd- Pro Bowl Rookie
by Ren Diggity on Feb 16, 2010 10:50 AM EST up reply actions
I see 3 +-somethings here, but only 2 recs. REC, people! :)
Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott
by Brian Galliford on Feb 16, 2010 10:51 AM EST up reply actions
+1
-Buffalo Rumblings resident Chan Gailey basher-
by norcaliangelsfan on Feb 16, 2010 10:57 AM EST up reply actions
Rec'd.....I will be pulling for Brohm because I think Trent is broken beyond repair as a Franchise QB
But if Trent is our best option, I will pray he does well.
If we end up with Vick, T.O., Richie I., and Porter….that is really pushing the dbag density limit for one team.
by Joe P. on Feb 16, 2010 11:23 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Finally, they must see something (they’re paid to see) that many fans refuse to…
Who is ‘They?’ If you are refering to the old regime (who brought him in,) it is irrelavent. If ‘they’ is Nix/Gailey, where did you see anything that makes you think they like Trent better than anyone else??
a.k.a. Undee
where did I see anything?
Yes, folks, I’m aware of the prevailing opinion – stemming from Mark Gaughan and Sal Maiorana of The Buffalo News – that Trent Edwards could emerge as new Buffalo Bills head coach Chan Gailey’s starting quarterback of choice next season
1st paragraph of article. It’s not me that thinks they like Trent more. Apparently, someone in the org. is telling these reporters that he “could emerge” as the starter. It’s one of the premises of the piece.
"In wine there is wisdom, in beer there is strength, in water there is bacteria"
I read both those articles, and nowhere does it imply that Chan Gailey has a preference for Trent. Instead, he plainly said he would leave all options on the table.
a.k.a. Undee
Brian
never quoted anyone. He said he’s aware of the prevailing opinion stemming from the articles. It’s a prevailing opinion drawn from the articles. We were invited to comment on the opinion! Nothing more.
"In wine there is wisdom, in beer there is strength, in water there is bacteria"
Did you read the articles Brian linked?
Because there are quotes from Gailey that you are free to comment on as part of the prevailing opinion.
a.k.a. Undee
I will save you the trouble. From "The Buffalo News" article:
Expect the Bills to investigate many options. Gailey made that clear during a news briefing Thursday.
“That decision will play out once you get a complete evaluation of the guys in the draft, and a complete evaluation of the guys you’ve got, and a complete evaluation of the guys that are out there available in free agency, or on the trading block,” Gailey said.
“There’s four categories there that you can make a move in or not make a move in, and play the pat hand, so to speak. I think it’s too early for me to say. I know everybody would like for us to have a decision today and tell exactly where we’re going, exactly what we’re going to do — I can’t give you that today,” he said.
a.k.a. Undee
No, it’s not. It says that Gaughan and Maiorana THINK that Edwards has that chance, not that someone told them he did.
Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott
by Brian Galliford on Feb 16, 2010 2:03 PM EST up reply actions
OK
but my point was it’s all opinion (Gaughan’s, Maiorana’s, ours) and nothing more, i.e. no fact, no quote, etc.
"In wine there is wisdom, in beer there is strength, in water there is bacteria"
But there IS a quote from Gailey,
and it says he doesn’t have a complete evaluation of the situation, so you can’t say that ‘they’ see something in Trent that makes him a likely (or 50/50) starter. That’s a fact.
a.k.a. Undee
ok, since my fellow Rumblers won't, I guess I'll hurl the brick
Really guys? We’re going to rec sticking with Edwards to hasten the rebuild? It sounds to me like your recing the idea of handing Edwards the starting gig – precisely what Brian is appealing to the Bills not to do. Just because next years QB class will be “heaven”, doesn’t mean the Bills should just wait until next year.
I hate to break it to everyone but quarterbacks aren’t like furniture and football teams aren’t like houses. Furniture doesn’t need time to adapt to the playing speed of the new house, nor does it need to develop its skills to be the best furniture it can be, and the living room couch doesn’t have to memorize a playbook and then lead all the other furniture into battle once a week with the hearts and souls of millions of fans resting on the couches success.
The longer you wait for your franchise quarterback, the longer you are stalling the rebuilding process period. I personally, have no problem with Edwards starting next year IF Sam Bradford is sitting on the bench and learning up on Gailey’s system and preparing himself to win at the highest level.
If we dont draft a quarterback this year and go full steam ahead with Edwards this team will quit on Gailey before he ever has a chance to reach them and correct the losing mentality that has developed in Buffalo. A team that hasn’t been to the playoffs in a decade – especially one with such a blend of aged veteran and young developing talent – must have a young QB to point to and say that he is the future of the team. It gives them direction, something to work for, and most importantly hope that a new field general is on the way. If we go into next season without a franchise QB somewhere on the roster because next years draft class is better you are setting yourself up for failure. Again, Bradford was supposed to go number 1 two years ago and now many think Clausen has passed him (I don’t). In the pre-season Snead was already pre-ordained the next great QB and now hes a third rounder at best. This goes to show you that you can not bank on opinions of a draft class two years before that draft. If you keep playing that game it could be 2013 before we get a young franchise guy in here as we bring in vet FA after vet FA, waiting for the right QB.
There is no right QB, you go out and get a guy. Thats how it works. The Jets future looks much brighter than it did before they traded for Sanchez, ditto for the Lions.
I firmly believe Edwards still CAN be a good NFL quarterback. I was one of the idiots who believed in him last off-season, after all. So keep him on the roster OVER Fitzpatrick, and let he and Bradford duke it out in training camp. If Bradford isn’t ready worst case scenario he LEARNS on the bench – GREAT!!
But for God’s sake, please don’t rationalize that letting Edwards start without drafting a QB this year will hasten anything other than more losing before the real rebuilding begins.
"you just have to know there's always going to be adversity. None of these games are going to be easy. Nothing will be given to us" - Paul Posluszny
by poz on Feb 16, 2010 12:55 PM EST up reply actions 3 recs
Once again, the two extremes
are expressed here. What if the Bills identify Bradford or Clausen as ‘the guy,’ but absolutely can’t find a way to get him, despite trying all avenues? What is the problem with waiting for a year while addressing other holes?
And on the other hand, it wouldn’t break the bank to make an upgrade over Trent with Pennington or Thigpen.
a.k.a. Undee
either way
it doesnt change the fact that waiting until next year will not in anyway speed up any rebuilding. Whether its the bills fault or not, the longer we wait for a QB , the longer we are waiting for our team to rebuild. If this means taking Jevan Snead in the third or fourth round if we can’t get Clausen or Bradford, we still should bring in competition for Edwards. Edwards to Thigpen seems like a lateral move to me, and Pennington may not have anything left. If the Bills somehow can not get Clausen/Bradford in round 1 , Tebow/McCoy/Snead in round 2 or 3 and LeFervour or Pike in rounds 4 or 5 – if all that happens – then they better give Edwards and Brohm a fair quarterback competition to allow Brohm a chance to win it from Edwards. Letting Edwards go another year without competition is a disaster.
"you just have to know there's always going to be adversity. None of these games are going to be easy. Nothing will be given to us" - Paul Posluszny
hahaha oh yes I will be
I would love to let Nix – who has a lot of experience drafting good QBs – and Gailey – who has a lot of experience coaching QBs – use their talents to nab their QB this year.
"you just have to know there's always going to be adversity. None of these games are going to be easy. Nothing will be given to us" - Paul Posluszny
I agree with you that the Bills need to have a good young QB to develop
But I disagree when you say if the Bills don’t get Bradford, Clausen, and possibly Tebow, McCoy, Snead, that they should draft a QB in the 3rd or 4th round. Do you know the success rate of QBs drafted in the 3rd or 4th round? You prob better off picking Jim Kelly and hoping he still has some left in the tank, cause your essentially wasting a pick and years trying to find out if this guy is any good (like we are with Edwards).
Identify which of the Bradford/Clausen possibly even Tebow/McCoy/Snead group 1 QB you think is the best, and then get that guy. Not that hard. The future of the franchise depends on this, in my opinion.
by StroudFanClub on Feb 16, 2010 1:35 PM EST up reply actions
totally agree
believe me my last resort is rounds 4 or 5. Totally agree with you.
"you just have to know there's always going to be adversity. None of these games are going to be easy. Nothing will be given to us" - Paul Posluszny
Identify which of the Bradford/Clausen possibly even Tebow/McCoy/Snead group 1 QB you think is the best, and then get that guy. Not that hard. The future of the franchise depends on this, in my opinion.
Wow. You just stated that it is simple to identify your Super Bowl QB and acquire in the draft. Maybe Nix should be giving you a call in April. :-)
a.k.a. Undee
But if Gailey/Nix feel strongly that the QB class of 2010 is weak
And they have already targeted someone in the class of 2011 who they want, why would it be disaster to let Edwards go another year with competition? Why couldn’t they address other positions in the meantime? You would rather them take a player they like less, just to get a QB in here?
by StroudFanClub on Feb 16, 2010 1:41 PM EST up reply actions
yes
because I dont know how they could possibly be targeting someone in 2011 at this point. In my opinion, at pick 9, this could be the closest we get to the top of the draft for a QB. We were 6-10 last year with a record breaking amount of injuries. I find it hard to believe we can get a higher draft pick next year if healthy. Now is the time to swing a trade to move up with Kansas City and nab Bradford.
"you just have to know there's always going to be adversity. None of these games are going to be easy. Nothing will be given to us" - Paul Posluszny
That is my dream scenario. To trade up for Bradford. I think he will be special.
God I hope One Bills Drive thinks the same way.
by StroudFanClub on Feb 16, 2010 1:48 PM EST up reply actions
2 things I like about Bradford that I think are very important to a QBs success in the NFL.
accuracy and diagnosing defenses – he seems like he’s the best in this class for that and part of the reason he won’t be making it to 9. or even 5 for that matter…..
Hello - thanks for reading my signature. It's very interesting. Bye
by J2 on Feb 16, 2010 1:52 PM EST up reply actions
yup
would you be willing to trade up to get him?
"you just have to know there's always going to be adversity. None of these games are going to be easy. Nothing will be given to us" - Paul Posluszny
i really can’t say that i’d trade up because i’ve only seen him play maybe 5 snaps.
i’m just going by the various reports of him being very accurate and being able to read defenses (which there are numerous reports).
I think those 2 things are paramount to a QBs success.
I can tell you one thing – it’s very difficult to build an NFL team and as much as i’d like the job – I feel bad for the guys (to an extent) that have to make the decisions becuase people like us will rip them apart regardless of the selection. i guarantee people in Indy were P.O.‘d when they took Manning. that’s the life of a GM.
if it were me and I had watched the tape and agreed that he’s accurate and smart then I would move up – I think QB is one thing that separates the losers from winners in this league. if you get the chance to take a guy that has a great chance of winning more games than losing then I think you have to take him.
we sit here and bicker about this and that – but the main reason we have’t been to the playoffs in 10 years is the QB position.
Hello - thanks for reading my signature. It's very interesting. Bye
by J2 on Feb 16, 2010 2:03 PM EST up reply actions
and there it is my friend!
we sit here and bicker about this and that – but the main reason we have’t been to the playoffs in 10 years is the QB position.
This is why I can not be happy if we wait another year to draft a big name guy. You hit it on the head.
"you just have to know there's always going to be adversity. None of these games are going to be easy. Nothing will be given to us" - Paul Posluszny
But it isn't because we haven't tried to fill the position
JP was a first round pick. Edwards had the endorsement of Bill Freaking Walsh! CHIX better get it right this time, or waiting one more year will be nothing compared to the ginormous waste of time certain to happen if CHIX hitch their wagon to another jackass instead of a Kentucky Derby winner.
If we end up with Vick, T.O., Richie I., and Porter….that is really pushing the dbag density limit for one team.
all true Joey
but think about this. We have a top 10 pick with trade bait in players and picks to move up even higher. JP Losman was a consensus tier 2 guy that was a reach even at the end of the first round and Trent was a third rounder. Its time we go get the top of the QB class!
"you just have to know there's always going to be adversity. None of these games are going to be easy. Nothing will be given to us" - Paul Posluszny
by poz on Feb 16, 2010 2:16 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
But that white speck at the top of chicken sh!t is still chicken sh!t
If we end up with Vick, T.O., Richie I., and Porter….that is really pushing the dbag density limit for one team.
haha so im guessing you dont like this years QBs?
"you just have to know there's always going to be adversity. None of these games are going to be easy. Nothing will be given to us" - Paul Posluszny
If we take Bradford....so be it, but if it were me.....I would wait and see what we got in EdFitzBro
and start scouting a QB now to draft next year.
If we end up with Vick, T.O., Richie I., and Porter….that is really pushing the dbag density limit for one team.
i really like Bradford
For a long time I was leaning towards Clausen because I was scared of Bradford’s injury in his shoulder no less, but its so hard to pass on a guy who is so accurate and has a big arm. Hes got good size to boot.
"you just have to know there's always going to be adversity. None of these games are going to be easy. Nothing will be given to us" - Paul Posluszny
that too
unlike Clausen who reports say is arrogant. I dont know if those reports are true, but I do know Bradford does seem like he can command respect.
"you just have to know there's always going to be adversity. None of these games are going to be easy. Nothing will be given to us" - Paul Posluszny
I think
despite Clausen being the favorite now, when all is said and done, Bradford will again settle in as the consensus best QB in the draft.
"you just have to know there's always going to be adversity. None of these games are going to be easy. Nothing will be given to us" - Paul Posluszny
by poz on Feb 16, 2010 1:59 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Bradford has yet to face much of a pass rush. Can he move in the pocket? Can he take an NFL hit?
My concern is that Bradford is the next Rob Johnson.
If we end up with Vick, T.O., Richie I., and Porter….that is really pushing the dbag density limit for one team.
LOL.....Well at least I didn't call him Loseman :-)
If we end up with Vick, T.O., Richie I., and Porter….that is really pushing the dbag density limit for one team.
hahahahahahaha
"you just have to know there's always going to be adversity. None of these games are going to be easy. Nothing will be given to us" - Paul Posluszny
well I do think
Bradford has more God given talents than Rob Johnson ever had so there is that. A lot of QBs coming out every year have yet to face a pass rush, which is why determining mental toughness is so important in drafting a QB and why picking one is risky. In the end its tough to gauge that. It also why Tebow’s “intangibles” have everyone all giddy. I think you can really only base it on the talents they present on the field and then go with your gut in terms of mental toughness.
"you just have to know there's always going to be adversity. None of these games are going to be easy. Nothing will be given to us" - Paul Posluszny
Not really. Rob had a great arm, great legs and he could surf. I don’t see how Sam has any more “God given” talent.
hes more accurate.
"you just have to know there's always going to be adversity. None of these games are going to be easy. Nothing will be given to us" - Paul Posluszny
I, on the other hand, do not think Sam Bradford will be special. I think he’ll be a solid NFL quarterback. He won’t be look at as one of the elite players, but he’ll be a smart, consistent guy capable of winning you games. He’ll be a good leader.
Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott
by Brian Galliford on Feb 16, 2010 2:05 PM EST up reply actions
can I ask you why, Brian?
"you just have to know there's always going to be adversity. None of these games are going to be easy. Nothing will be given to us" - Paul Posluszny
Sam Bradford resume:
NCAA record 36 td passes for a Freshman
69.5% comp , 36 tds, 8 Ints as Freshman
67.9 comp %, 50 tds!, 8 Ints as Sophomore
Only second sophomore (redshirt sophomore) to win Heisman Trophy
2008 All-Big 12 Academic Team
And if that’s not enough:
Senior year (high school) in basketball averaged a double-double!
Not too shabby!
by StroudFanClub on Feb 16, 2010 2:35 PM EST up reply actions
actually – I see a regression in record. too much staff turnover – guys learning new positions and some roster turnover with scheme installation
Hello - thanks for reading my signature. It's very interesting. Bye
by J2 on Feb 16, 2010 1:51 PM EST up reply actions
interesting
for me, I can’t imagine a worse record because we were horrible last year, offensively inept, Fitzpatrick at QB, three different starters under center, defensive injuries everywhere, no run D, coaching fires mid season, and we still were 6-10. Makes you realize how bad the Lions really are. To me I don’t see how we can get worse and therefore get a better spot for a QB next year.
"you just have to know there's always going to be adversity. None of these games are going to be easy. Nothing will be given to us" - Paul Posluszny
To me I don’t see how we can get worse and therefore get a better spot for a QB next year.
fair and logical. I guess i just know we are in complete rebuild mode so I am trying not to get my hopes up. i’d say 3-7 wins is the range i’d put is in for next year.
but….. THAT’S WHY THEY PLAY THE GAMES
Hello - thanks for reading my signature. It's very interesting. Bye
by J2 on Feb 16, 2010 2:04 PM EST up reply actions
being a Bills fan is tough isnt it
when you spend an off-season deflating expectations so you dont get burned again. Man, I cant wait to be good again.
"you just have to know there's always going to be adversity. None of these games are going to be easy. Nothing will be given to us" - Paul Posluszny
no thank you on Trent
castration is irreversible. Trent never has shown the ability to be a strong leader, even before he broke his noggin and subsequently lost the team.
most of my posts get deleted :(
And to make this claim already is very un-"give the guy a chance" of you!
“The NFL Draft is weak on quarterbacks this year, as well. Sam Bradford and Jimmy Clausen are widely considered the top options, but it’s very possible both could be gone by the time the Bills’ ninth overall pick rolls around. Talent drops off severely from that point; it’s possible that this draft could yield zero quality NFL starters.”
I feel like we say this every year, no? We loved Bradford, he was almost going to be the #1 overall pick until he came back to college and suffered a few injuries. McCoy was getting more love before playing this season as well. It’s tough to dismiss a class with so many national championship and heisman trophy winners. (I know, I know, those guys don’t always pan out) But very un- “give this guy a chance” of you! : )
I haven’t even taken a stance on talent not on the roster. Didn’t really take a stance on Edwards, either.
I’m playing the whole thing by ear, because the situation is rather difficult to read. And “playing it by ear” is nearly synonymous with “give the guy a chance,” is it not?
Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott
by Brian Galliford on Feb 16, 2010 9:55 AM EST up reply actions
Yes, playing by ear is the same as give the guy a chance.
I thought you were more or less already dismissing the entire QB crop of 2010, which to me would be a mistake. My bad.
by StroudFanClub on Feb 16, 2010 10:09 AM EST up reply actions
“would you accept Edwards as the team’s starter from any situation other than the winner of a fair, balanced competition?”
Of course not.
But if he wins it fair and square, I’ll take him on the condition that I see improvement in the rest of the infrastructure of the team, with the idea that 1) Edwards becomes what some people, not me, thought he could become or 2) we find the Answer at qb and switch him in when its time.
I wouldn’t be shocked at all if Edwards opens the season as a starter. Can’t wait for training camp! :-)
YES WE CHAN!
Tweet
Your daily source for Buffalo Bills information.
Can’t wait for training camp!
Sarcasm?
by StroudFanClub on Feb 16, 2010 9:09 AM EST up reply actions
No. I really enjoy camp. Not only that but the depth chart will start to take shape.
YES WE CHAN!
Tweet
Your daily source for Buffalo Bills information.
by MattRichWarren on Feb 16, 2010 9:31 AM EST up reply actions
Ah ok. I couldn't tell from you post. I share your same view of camp, I really enjoy it as well.
In fact, a friend of the family works for the Bills so last year I was able to watch like 5 practices from the player’s/employees family tent! really cool experience.
by StroudFanClub on Feb 16, 2010 9:39 AM EST up reply actions
I was in that tent for one game. A friend of mine won a contest and had an extra ticket for me. There was booze in there!
YES WE CHAN!
Tweet
Your daily source for Buffalo Bills information.
by MattRichWarren on Feb 16, 2010 9:40 AM EST up reply actions
Personally, I think you should be in that tent every practice. You have an important job keeping us informed
The food is unreal as well.
by StroudFanClub on Feb 16, 2010 9:42 AM EST up reply actions
Screw the tent. Try on the field.
Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott
by Brian Galliford on Feb 16, 2010 9:55 AM EST up reply actions
I would love to be on the sideline. Field… not so much. I’d get killed by Kawika I think.
YES WE CHAN!
Tweet
Your daily source for Buffalo Bills information.
by MattRichWarren on Feb 16, 2010 12:20 PM EST up reply actions
and there is no booze on the field, right MRW? haha!
"you just have to know there's always going to be adversity. None of these games are going to be easy. Nothing will be given to us" - Paul Posluszny
Well true but if I was a legit reporter I wouldn’t be partaking anyways. I live five minutes away from SJF. I think I could wait. :-)
YES WE CHAN!
Tweet
Your daily source for Buffalo Bills information.
by MattRichWarren on Feb 16, 2010 1:17 PM EST up reply actions
hahaha!
I live five minutes away from SJF.
This explains a lot!
"you just have to know there's always going to be adversity. None of these games are going to be easy. Nothing will be given to us" - Paul Posluszny
mostly why you are the best reporter on the web!
"you just have to know there's always going to be adversity. None of these games are going to be easy. Nothing will be given to us" - Paul Posluszny
I don’t think there’s any real consideration to ‘handing’ the job to Edwards. But FA options could be limited, QBs may or may not be available in the draft and if they are the team might not like them enough to take one.
Given that, you have Fitzpatrick and Edwards to work with. (And Brohm if you’re the optimistic type). I still believe that Edwards is a better QB than Fitzpatrick. I know he was bad last year, but even with that he still was arguably as good or better than Fitzpatrick (QB rating and Football Outsider ratings were both similar with Edwards a little better in both).
But what I can’t get over with Edwards is the start to the 2008 season. We’ve seen him be excellent before. And that was with DJ, a terrible offensive mind, as head coach. This year he had an OC that was put into a position he wasn’t ready to handle. Not to mention the time not having a QB coach to work with anymore. What happens if you put him with a coach who is known to get the most out of his QBs, particularly underwhelming QBs?
The one troubling thing for me with Edwards is that the team, or at least the WRs, preferred Fitzpatrick strongly.
I’m not saying Edwards is a Super Bowl level QB, but I think he’s an acceptable option until that QB is found.
The one troubling thing for me with Edwards is that the team, or at least the WRs, preferred Fitzpatrick strongly.
I am glad you brought this up, because it seemed obvious that the WRs were excited when Fitz replaced TE in the Jets game. Is Trent aloof to the team, or do the WRs just have no confidence in his skills?
a.k.a. Undee
Starts up front!
- I surely am not defending Trent Edwards, but you have to take into consideration that the Bills had the worst offensive line in football – Every time Edwards or Fitzpatrick dropped back, they were running for their lives. Yes, you do win in the trenches, and anybody that doesn’t believe you need a solid offensive line to win in this league, should start reading books written by Parcells and Lombardi.
- Tony Romo is a prime example of a QB that has all day to throw and in my opinion, would be another Trent Edwards if he played behind a line like the Bills.
- Where was the running game? Bills didn’t have much of one and that only makes it that much more difficult on the Q.B. – Jets made it to the Championship thanks to an excellent offensive line and average Q.B. in Sanchez.
- Until the Bills build a solid offensive line, I doubt it is even worth drafting a Q.B. in the first round.
- why is Edwards despised – I would think Crackhead Lynch should be more despised than him – Or Orenthal James………give me a break, that comment makes no sense!!!!
- Typical Buffalo!
But that’s not the thesis of the article. Someone is going to have to come in and play behind whatever line the Bills have. Brian doesn’t want that job to be handed to Edwards.
YES WE CHAN!
Tweet
Your daily source for Buffalo Bills information.
by MattRichWarren on Feb 16, 2010 9:32 AM EST up reply actions
Brian doesn’t want that job to be handed to Edwards.
Ok, and I don’t think it matters how the next QB is given the job, or even who that QB is (as long as they don’t give up valuable draft picks or money for the guy). We disagree. So now what? Should we joust, American Gladiators style, to see why is right? haha
by StroudFanClub on Feb 16, 2010 9:37 AM EST up reply actions
We’re not even really disagreeing, though. Not on the ultimate point of the article, anyway.
Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott
by Brian Galliford on Feb 16, 2010 9:56 AM EST up reply actions
Your just trying to get out of jousting, aren't you? : )
by StroudFanClub on Feb 16, 2010 10:23 AM EST up reply actions
As much as I love that famous scene from The Cable Guy, I’m really not into medieval affairs.
Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott
by Brian Galliford on Feb 16, 2010 10:50 AM EST up reply actions
What if you were told it was American Gladiators-style jousting?!?!
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
Brian's pen is mightier than his sword :-)
If we end up with Vick, T.O., Richie I., and Porter….that is really pushing the dbag density limit for one team.
considering
all the other options and Gailey being known from turning chicken **$% into chicken salad, I wouldn’t totally be against having Edwards as the starter. However, that said, even keeping Edwards around is going to prevent this franchise from moving forward. I think the Bills are royally screwed because I don’t see them solving the QB spot unless they somehow trade for McNabb which seems ridiculously unlikely. I say tank it this year, transition to the 3-4 and hope to get a franchise signal caller in 2011.
MARVelous - "I went from America's team to North America's Team" Terrell Owens
and of course
hope is not a plan. But in the case of the Buffalo Bills, hope is our only plan!
MARVelous - "I went from America's team to North America's Team" Terrell Owens
too true (hangs head and mopes off stage left)
by oompaloompa on Feb 16, 2010 12:33 PM EST up reply actions
Wow, very impressed with the responses so far!
Kudos! It seems (so far) that we are somewhat in agreement that:
1.) We are rebuilding.
2.) We need to find the next great NFL quarterback to lead us to the Super Bowl.
3.) Trent Edwards wouldn’t be a bad guy to QB the team in the meantime….in fact, there is the possibility he could fulfill some of his potential. And if not, no biggie anyway.
See, Bills fans can be patient. But we should also be rewarded for our patience. PLEASE BRING THE NEXT PEYTON MANNING, DREW BREES, BRETT FAVRE, PHIL RIVERS in to QB the Bills! WE DESERVE TO WATCH ANOTHER HOF QB PLAY HERE. IT MAY BE THE ONLY WAY WE EVER WIN A SUPER BOWL. MAKE IT HAPPEN. You have our support to lose the next few years, but we better have a difference maker at QB to watch for the next 10 years in return.
WHY ARE WE YELLING! haha, if you can't tell by my having 50% of the posts on this thread,
I have some definte opinions on this topic!
by StroudFanClub on Feb 16, 2010 9:28 AM EST up reply actions
Edwards---No Way
Edwards is a capable back-up QB that might last in the NFL for 10+ years ala Todd Collins. I do not see a starting QB when I watch him play.
Sure he’ll have a few good games as long as everything is going well in the game but when things start going wrong he is not the type that can pull a team out of the druthers. He will never be the over confident QB that is the trait of the great ones as shown by his inability to hit a receiver on the move and his penchant for checking down too fast. Opposing teams already know that he can be rattled and will come after him on every occasion—-I don’t care if he plays behind a good O-line or not he is what he is. Plus, he is one head injury from being forced to retire. He had injury problem’s at Stanford and he has had injury problem’s with the Bills.
.
'To get something you never had,
you have to do something you never did.'
"Opposing teams already know that he can be rattled and will come after him on every occasion"
I am not sure if he was always skittish in the pocket, or he got that way because he got his bell rung twice. Has his confidence been destroyed a la David Carr/Joey Harrington? If he can come back, though, how long before he gets decked again?
Comes down to pocket awareness, I think. If he had a better awareness he would he not have found himself in those situations.
Fitz has better pocket awareness, I think. Doesn’t get himself into those situations. But then he’s got a significantly poorer skill set.
by oompaloompa on Feb 16, 2010 12:44 PM EST up reply actions
Edwards is one of the most despised players in recent Bills history.
I still want to know how this happened. I don’t understand how the guy was completely vilified. Obviously, his play was horrible over the last year and a half. But doesn’t he still have some of the same qualities that we admired when he was playing good?
And can’t his confidence be fixed with a slump buster?
Now, I’m not saying he’s the cure-all forever, but he can’t be that bad of an option for a rebuilding year.
by krytime on Feb 16, 2010 9:29 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
Despised
I was a little surprised by that choice of words.I think there’s a reasonable chance he can be resurected with good coaching and an improved OL—and as was said above—no great loss if it doesn’t work out.
I chose the word “despised” because I’ve seen the way he’s treated in the stadium on game days. Being a part of that crowd, it can be a little terrifying. Granted, many of the people hurling the insults probably don’t remember doing it the next day, but there you go.
Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott
by Brian Galliford on Feb 16, 2010 9:49 AM EST up reply actions
did edwards ever really have "qualities that we admired"
If you look back at the games he won at the start of last year ("08), they were against what ended up being the bottom dwellers of the league. At his best he was never able to beat any respectable teams let alone come close to beating any of the top ones.
Buffalo needs to just move on and find another option to try.
I think that would work....
as long as it is a fair competition with equal reps and they bring in competent veterans to push Trent I can see how that would help Trent mature and maybe were able able to bring out his upside that everyone was talking about at the start of last season…..I’m starting to think OBD are Quarterback killer……where a quarterbacks promise comes to crash and burn
Rrrawrrrr, rrrawrrr like a dungeon dragon-Busta Ryhmes
No Poll!!
Count me in the pro-Edwards group. Any half-decent coach or coordinator will see from film that Edwards has talent and upside and may be Rich Gannon-ish. He needs a good line and no TO. Besides the line, I think TO was the worst thing to happen to Edwards. TO forced the Bills to call games differently than they normally would. Edwards does not need a deep threat, he need many sure handed short threats, i.e., RBs, TEs, possession WR and good pass catching FBs.
I don’t think Edwards would be handed the job, but Gailey would be crazy not to seriously consider him.
by Ono on Feb 16, 2010 9:48 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
100% agree Brian
We obviously need a QB, but I’d rather wait a year and get the right QB than acquire one this year that will leave us in the same predicament down the road. We’re not going to compete next year so let’s fill the other holes.
New York City Buffalo Bills Backers
www.nycbbb.com
I didn’t really say any of that, though.
Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott
by Brian Galliford on Feb 16, 2010 9:56 AM EST up reply actions
Haha!
I also 100% agree, Brian. I echo your sentiments about posted above concerning the revitalization of downtown Buffalo….
by StroudFanClub on Feb 16, 2010 9:58 AM EST up reply actions
You said free agency sucks for qb, and the 2 first round qbs
You said free agency sucks for qb, and the 2 first round qbs may not be there when we pick…I assume you meant this might not be the year we upgrade, simply because we cant.
New York City Buffalo Bills Backers
www.nycbbb.com
Gotcha. I brought that up basically to support Gaughan’s claim.
But we have no idea whether or not the Bills will fall in love with a Pennington, a Bradford, a Clausen or, hell, even a Tebow. (Sorry, everyone.) They might, and if they do, they’ll probably be aggressive in getting that guy.
I don’t think there’s one specific way a team can be re-built, so I don’t suggest doing it one way or another. But when you get a chance at a franchise QB, you pounce, and if the Bills think they can find that guy in the next 2-3 months, then they should absolutely pounce.
Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott
by Brian Galliford on Feb 16, 2010 10:09 AM EST up reply actions
Of course, I just think many feel we’re def going to go out and get a new QB this year. If they have a target, then sure, but if they don’t and feel they won’t get “their man” this year then I wouldn’t be shocked if they stuck with who they have for a year while they fill other holes.
In the end, I really hope they really like one of the guys you mentioned as QB is step one as you said.
New York City Buffalo Bills Backers
www.nycbbb.com
OK. Yeah, we’re on the same page. :)
Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott
by Brian Galliford on Feb 16, 2010 10:50 AM EST up reply actions
Do you think any of the QBs from this draft are going to be franchise material? Just because they are the highest rated QB of THIS draft doesn’t necessarily mean they are franchise material.
(And I mean this franchise in the Bills specifically, the Jets had a solid foundation already in place with there D and O-line (and a lesser extent RB). The Bills are essentially starting from scratch here)
Are there any QBs that you absolutely have to have in order to make this team a success? Personally I don’t think so. And you’ve said it a hundred times to take your franchise QB first.
So essentially what I’m asking here is, if you see more value in the QBs coming out next year, and you’re in position to take a QB this year what do you do? Also considering we likely will have more needs this year than next…
I believe that two quarterbacks from this draft class are franchise material. One of them is Bradford. The other is… slightly more controversial.
There are also two more guys that have a shot at it, too – and Clausen is one of them.
Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott
by Brian Galliford on Feb 16, 2010 8:16 PM EST up reply actions
Jevan Snead right?
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
Interesting
But I still would like to know if you think the QB class next year is something that we could/should potentially wait for, and address other positions of need this year.
I like Edwards, but...
I’m not sure if he is the answer. I would prefer to see the Bills bring in Pennington, and have Edwards serve as his back-up. He can learn from Pennington, and then may be ready to lead once Chad retires.
I give him a bit of a pass, because I’m not sure who could have succeeded with that o-line, a new o coordinator, and a new offensive scheme that made no sense for the personnel that was in place.
by MarinoTheBill on Feb 16, 2010 9:48 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
I would be fine with it only if...
- We draft a QB that is not yet ready Week 1.
- Brohm shows he does not have the potential we were hoping for and
- Edwards beats Fitzy for the job. (last year Fitz was arguably better)
They are hard to play but not hard to beat.
- Mike Lombardi on the Buffalo Bills
disagree on "arguably better"
Ryan Fitzpatrick 227 127 1,422 55.9 6.3 9 4.0 10 4.4 98 21 127 69.7
Trent Edwards 183 110 1,169 60.1 6.4 6 3.3 7 3.8 46 23 139 73.8
Edwards stats were better amost across the board. Obviuosly yardage was off because Fitz played more games. Otherwise, Edwards had better comp. %, QB rating and yds./completion.
"In wine there is wisdom, in beer there is strength, in water there is bacteria"
sorry
the headings didn’t carry over.
"In wine there is wisdom, in beer there is strength, in water there is bacteria"
there’s only one stat that matters.
by quantumuprising on Feb 16, 2010 10:43 AM EST up reply actions
true
but you need to perform in several areas to get to that ONE stat.
"In wine there is wisdom, in beer there is strength, in water there is bacteria"
well if you can't play
you can’t win. # of victories in this case is irrelevant.
"In wine there is wisdom, in beer there is strength, in water there is bacteria"
wha? Both played!
TE was 1-3 = .25%
RF was 5-7 = .48%
How about this: TE lost to the Browns, and RF beat the Dolphins. Those were the worst/best games of the season, IMO.
a.k.a. Undee
The best ending, for sure. Not really a bashing, though, eh? Jones’ first half made me wanna puke.
a.k.a. Undee
it was a bashing IMO simply because the Jets were undefeated and supposedly on their way to the Big Show. Losing to the Bills knocked the wheels off the Jet train for several games. loved it, loved it, loved it.
most of my posts get deleted :(
All out competition for the job is the way to go..
Trent got the job handed to Him last year and showed absolutely nothing in the preseason that I could see anyways..Unless you have a QB in the class of Jim Kelly,I think every preseason should be a competition like that..Seeing what each QB has under game conditions trumps all the ratings on paper in the world..I don’t see us as having a set offensive plan yet anyway so each Guy getting equal reps and playing time should give Chan an idea of what to do..Hopefully we’ll see some 2 TE lineups that just might give the starting edge to one of the QB’s we have or anyone they choose to bring in..
Never argue with an Idiot,they'll drag You down to their level and beat You with experience every time..
Edwards
As any other bills fan I want to see our team in the playoffs at least its been 10 years. And ya Chan Gailey said that Edwards could be the starter in 2010….are you serious “Captain Checkdown”. This is like a step back in my mind. However, Gailey is a man that builds QB so remember when we rallied around Edwards with that 5-1 a year ago. I will agree with anyone that after the concussion he was not the same but if Gailey is the man we all know. Captain Checkdown could lead us back to some winning record. We need to look at the future but lets face it the bills organization can’t turn around in a year unless Ralph starts using some of that money in this uncapped year.
One example I want to throw out there is the Ravens they had a hell of a Denfense….(our secondary is nasty, our LB core could be great with mitchell poz maybin schobel and maybe foote or porter, and a few tweaks in the d-line we are good enough to be a defensive team). Remember the Ravens offense horrible with trent dilferlets face it I think edwards is a little better than that the man was nothing special.
I think we need to build and our defense can be very strong if our coaching staff knows who to bring in and what position to play them at. Our offense needs work QB, OT, WR…..it can’t all happen in one year…All I can say is that as a Bills fan i will always wear my colors proud no matter how bad our team is and no matter how many years it takes to it the playoffs
by BillsStampede34 on Feb 16, 2010 10:23 AM EST reply actions
I completely agree with Brian
But i really don’t think Chix will hand it over to Edwards. Right now it seems like they are going to go through every possible option, before even considering who the starting QB will be. I don’t “despise” Edwards, but he simply looked scared out there. I think he is the better QB between Fitz and him, but when no one trusts you, and you don’t trust you O-line on any play – well you lose.
I was born in Buffalo, and NO, it's not a suburb of New York City
by Ghetts on Feb 16, 2010 10:26 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
As one of the biggest Trent supporters of course I would be all for given Trent a chance to earn the job....
I recognize he needs some work…….but with the way the team has handled QB’s the last few years it isnt suprising that the last two young guys they have tried to groom have turned into certified train-wrecks……….
Thats more on the coaching and development more than the talent I believe. Trent lost himself and the team……..but theres no reason to believe that he cant earn the team back as well.
I agree no matter what the team decides to do that I competition for the starting job is the only way to solve this mess right now.
-Buffalo Rumblings resident Chan Gailey basher-
by norcaliangelsfan on Feb 16, 2010 10:37 AM EST reply actions
You hit the nail on the head Brian!
In our recent past, we handed over the QB1 position to rookies out of desperation. Both Losman & Edwards (especially Edwards) were thrown in way too quick and the pressure got top them.
The more I think about this year’s draft and the 2010 season, I am absolutely convinced that we need to fix the LT position more than anything and there are very good quality options to us in Rd1, which is probably where we need to be looking this year. I am starting to believe the hype about Gailey and his ability to get the most out of any QB. If this is indeed accurate, then maybe he can salvage Trent’s career? Trent did look like he had the “smarts” at the beginning, with the proper tutelage & guidance and better protection up front and more importantly – better play calling and much less predictability and maybe with a little deception sprinkled in, maybe just maybe he could be successful.
For 2010, if we fix our line and as a result decide to let our 3 incumbents battle it out, I’d be fine with that. I agree with you Brian that nothing should be given and it should be a fair 3-way competition. I definitely wouldn’t mind getting a veteran QB in Buffalo but not at the expense of high draft picks, we really need every draft pick we have. I look at options next year for QBs and I really like Mallet or Locker so if 2010 is the year where we solidify the trenches and prepare for 2011, I’m fine with that. Our QBs were unlucky last year in that they had no Oline and absolutely no offensive strategy or system. Firing the OC two weeks prior to the season (Actually not firing him at the conclusion of 2008 was the real crime) and putting so many eggs in the “no-huddle” basket wasn’t the QB’s fault. I look at Drew Brees and he clearly does not have a canon arm but it doesn’t prevent him from being one of the best. I look at the begining of Bree’s career and it is quite similar to Trent in 2008, so I certainly am not averse to giving him another chance to compete for the position. At the end of the day, we have so many other fish to fry, we might as well make sure he wasn’t “the one”.
Nothing left to say... the clock is ticking...
by keysh67 on Feb 16, 2010 10:50 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
I have a feeling Trent will be our starter
At least to start the year.
I don’t see a veteran trade as something likely to happen. I’m not sure Pennington will find his way to Buffalo. I think Bradford and Clausen will both go ahead of the Bills’ pick, and may not even be players Nix/Whaley/Gailey even like.
I think giving Edwards a chance to start by having him compete with Fitzpatrick (or another low-tier FA) and Brohm, while adding a mid/late round rookie with some potential is what’s going to happen this year. We simply can’t force something to happen here.
In the end, Trent Edwards is the ugly girl that puts out is a sure thing. We can spend all day hitting on that hot girl and working our magic trying to get with them (big name veteran or rookie), yet won’t be able to seal the deal. At the end of the night, we’ll be going home with the ugly girl who might look alright after a dozen beers (Trent), which might end up being slightly better than the girl with annoying voice and beer gut (Fitzpatrick) or the girl who was hot in high school, but now just has major problems all around (Brohm).
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Feb 16, 2010 10:58 AM EST reply actions 9 recs
comparing QB's to chicks..........
awesome…..rec’d
-Buffalo Rumblings resident Chan Gailey basher-
by norcaliangelsfan on Feb 16, 2010 10:59 AM EST up reply actions
Re--going home with the ugly girl
Funny analogy!!!
Tequila will make the ugly girl look so much better.
Sign Pennington—drink plenty of Tequila and suddenly Edwards looks like he is playing like Peyton Manning…
'To get something you never had,
you have to do something you never did.'
Trent is not the ugly girl
Trent is the pretty, flirty one that never goes all the way goes the distance, er. I mean long.
The Missing Link in the Chan Gang
See this is a good analogy....rec'd
FYI – I used to always go home with the hot chick ;-)
If we end up with Vick, T.O., Richie I., and Porter….that is really pushing the dbag density limit for one team.
was her name
“Courier Express”?
"In wine there is wisdom, in beer there is strength, in water there is bacteria"
by fansince60 on Feb 16, 2010 11:38 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Courier Express"?
Classic—-LMAO!
You’re giving your age away….
Joe-P—-did the Hot Chick always have her full set of teeth????
'To get something you never had,
you have to do something you never did.'
Goose - Couldn't tell from the back ;-)
If we end up with Vick, T.O., Richie I., and Porter….that is really pushing the dbag density limit for one team.
"Goose - Couldn't tell from the back ;-) "
Joe-P—-sounds like the perfect offensive Scheme!!
'To get something you never had,
you have to do something you never did.'
It is a spread offense that needs good protection for it to work.
If we end up with Vick, T.O., Richie I., and Porter….that is really pushing the dbag density limit for one team.
LOL!!!!!! Well played fansince60...rec'd
If we end up with Vick, T.O., Richie I., and Porter….that is really pushing the dbag density limit for one team.
Did you, or did you just think you were going home with the hot chick?!?!
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
Never stayed around long enough for the alcohol to wear off :-)
If we end up with Vick, T.O., Richie I., and Porter….that is really pushing the dbag density limit for one team.
I already drink when I watch the Bills so the analogy is apt.
YES WE CHAN!
Tweet
Your daily source for Buffalo Bills information.
by MattRichWarren on Feb 16, 2010 12:24 PM EST up reply actions
i love the Brohm analogy!
hahahahaha, the girl who was hot in high school but now has major problems all around! hAHAHAHAHAHA
"you just have to know there's always going to be adversity. None of these games are going to be easy. Nothing will be given to us" - Paul Posluszny
I’m basing this on the “QB Hits” stat rather than sacks, as I consider it a far more telling barometer of an offensive line’s performance. Look at the top half of O-Lines in that category, only 2 of the sixteen teams there were flat out uncompetitive this year: the Browns and the Panthers (who still managed to finish 8-8). The rest of those teams either made the playoffs or were in it until the last week or two. The first and third ranked teams in that category played in the Super Bowl and the Jets (fourth) played in the AFC Championship. Now look at the bottom ten, only two of those teams made the playoffs behind quarterbacks that were able to put up fantastic stats because their O-Line gave them a little time to pass before collapsing. The Bills O-Line had guys in the back field seemingly before the pall was snapped. When a QB has a hand in his face in under a second, that’s when bad things start to happen.
Now that I’ve mentioned the O-Line, I have to say I’m probably one of the few that wouldn’t have any problem if Edwards won the job in the preseason. I have yet to have a problem seeing Trent Edwards take the field because there’s something about the guy when he’s under center that tells me he has what it takes to be an above average starting quarterback. Remember when we started 5-1 and he was putting up very solid numbers? Remember a big factor in why we started 5-1 besides what looked like pocket presence from Edwards? We could actually run the ball into the end zone. In 2008, Edwards was never the primary reason why we lost 8 of our last 10, in some games he was barely a factor. It is very easy to throw a QB under the bus because he plays at the most glorified position on the field, but a young quarterback with a bad offensive line spells disaster. Trent’s biggest problem is that he’s too smart. He knows enough not to randomly throw the ball 50 yards down the field into the waiting arms of a defender, but he takes things a step too far and doesn’t throw the ball 15 or 20 yards down the field. Trent is a coachable guy that doesn’t deserve to be handed anything, but if he goes head-to-head-to-head against Fitz and Brohm, I think he’s the better true-QB and is the guy with more potential. But an offensive line together that can hold up a little better than past ones and I think he’s got a shot to be a successful quarterback.
by tlama2517 on Feb 16, 2010 11:20 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
for the epitome of Edwards' situation, one only
has to look at the picture in the heading of this article….not an O lineman in the picture. So, I hope O linemen are in the ’10 draft picture!
"In wine there is wisdom, in beer there is strength, in water there is bacteria"
Can Edwards mental state (and career) be salvaged?
I think he received a heavy dose of David Carr treatment last year from his terrible O-line and it did a lot of damage to his psyche. That combined with 2 concussions in two years, plus Jauron’s conservative coaching probably had a lot to do with his regression.
The question is, with a bolstered O-line and fresh energy and ideology in coaching and playcalling, can Edwards redeem himself?
I still agree that we need to bring somebody new in, whether its from FA/trade/Draft, but I’m not totally convinced that Edwards career as a viable starter in Buffalo is over.
by GregFromNJ on Feb 16, 2010 11:30 AM EST reply actions 3 recs
I wonder if Trent can care about the Bills after last season. I can still see him being a great QB in the NFL (he had the Bill Walsh blessing after all), but a team would need to play to his strengths (West Coast offense), and I don’t think his strength will ever be throwing the ball over the defense like the move to bring in TO demanded. I guess I think Trent is ruined goods, though I wish he would succeed in Buffalo, but I just don’t see it happening. Hopefully, the horse whisperer they brought in as QB coach will work some magic, but again, I’m doubtful.
I can’t believe the Bills didn’t spend the time trying to develop Trent’s slant pass throw. That should be his bread and butter.
I also don’t want any fresh draft pick to be the backup to Trent. I definitely want a veteran backup so that when Trent does get hurt, we are not pushing another rookie onto a raw team and ruining another young QB.
I also think the only way for Trent to succeed is to not bring TO back. The only time they had chemistry was like the first 4 days of training camp. Having TO demand the ball, having the coaches demand Trent to throw to TO, and then have TO drop all those passes cannot be good for a QBs confidence.
I’m perfectly fine with check downs to Freddy.
And as GfNJ states, the O-line is the most critically important part of the team.
Edwards
I’m all for having him win the starting job, if we then focus on protecting him adequately.
The Missing Link in the Chan Gang
I don't have anyone
particular in mind for the future, but for the present, there are trends here that are being swept under the table.
Trent might have something to salvage, but first he has to erase the negative perceptions he has created in his teammates’ minds—and that’s a major disadvantage. That’s where Pennington has the advantage over Trent.
Why is the focus of this article (and comments) about Trent (among current QBs) being the heir apparent? Didn’t we witness Fitz prove he’s a slightly better option? (at least until Trent proves he regained confidence)
I have always liked Edwards as a person. He seems nice, smart, and happy to be a Bill. But after I saw how the team responded better to Fitz, I can’t see how TE is still thought of as the best QB on the roster. Can someone straighten me out?
a.k.a. Undee
Didn’t we witness Fitz prove he’s a slightly better option?
I don’t think so. I think Fitz was better for the team last year. I don’t think Fitz has proven to be more talented than Edwards and that’s the point.
YES WE CHAN!
Tweet
Your daily source for Buffalo Bills information.
by MattRichWarren on Feb 16, 2010 1:18 PM EST up reply actions
I don’t think Fitz has proven to be more talented than Edwards and that’s the point.
That is not the point if Fitz commands more respect from the team, and therefore leads a more confident unit.
a.k.a. Undee
But what if it’s a different unit? With a different general at the helm?
YES WE CHAN!
Tweet
Your daily source for Buffalo Bills information.
by MattRichWarren on Feb 16, 2010 2:00 PM EST up reply actions
My point is, as of last season, the Bills seemed to rally around Fitz. That’s all I can speculate on. Anything could happen in the future, but it seems more logical that Fitz has a better shot at starting on opening day than Trent.
a.k.a. Undee
lol rally? what were we 4-5 with fitz at the helm with the 4th win being against Indys backups? If they had played that game easily would have put Fitzy at 3-6
he also had a 55% completion percentage 9 TDs and 10 picks. not someone I want running my team 5 years into his NFL career.
he’s a backup – it’s not more logical that he starts over Trent because we’ve basically seen what he can do in this league and its not much. Trent at least is younger with more upside and the potential to break out of his captain checkdown mode with good/solid coaching.
if it were me – I’d take Trent over Fitzy.
Hello - thanks for reading my signature. It's very interesting. Bye
by J2 on Feb 16, 2010 3:27 PM EST up reply actions
O.K., 'rally' is a bit strongly worded.
I hear what you are saying. I should have said “the Bills seemed slightly more alive when Fitz stepped in.”
And as far as Trent’s potential…I agree he has upside that Fitz doesn’t. It is just so hard to believe Trent will revert to his days of confidence. I hope the best for him, though. And as of today, I’d take Fitz over Trent, but not by a significant margin.
a.k.a. Undee
Fitzy throws lots of ducks....
… frankly a lot of bad passes.
But the guys like him.
Is he our Kenny Stabler? The Snake threw TONS of crappy passes, but won games.
Thoughts?
Would Fitzy be better this year with another Bills year under his belt.?
"A failure becomes just one time at bat if you refuse to let it defeat you." Marv Levy.
by SERGEANT MAJOR THOR on Feb 16, 2010 8:11 PM EST up reply actions
Would Fitzy be better this year with another Bills year under his belt.?
he might – but new coaches and scheme change make the transition from last year to this year more difficult.
plus – you’re asking the wrong question. you should ask yourself if the Bills would be better off with Fitzy at the helm for another year. I think the answer to that qeustion is no. we really need to develope a guy and get him going in the right direction to lead this franchise for the next 10 years. i’m pretty sure fitzy isn’t that guy
Hello - thanks for reading my signature. It's very interesting. Bye
by J2 on Feb 17, 2010 9:01 AM EST up reply actions
it seems more logical that Fitz has a better shot at starting on opening day than Trent.
Only if the same coaches were here. I think Trent, the more talented QB, has the better shot of starting opening day.
YES WE CHAN!
Tweet
Your daily source for Buffalo Bills information.
by MattRichWarren on Feb 17, 2010 10:07 AM EST up reply actions
Gailey’s repeated use of the word “production” leads me to believe we’ll be seeing someone like Pennington as starter. Trent will be lucky to beat out Brohm for #3.
most of my posts get deleted :(
You contradict yourself. If Gailey is all about production, how could Brohm be ahead of Edwards?
YES WE CHAN!
Tweet
Your daily source for Buffalo Bills information.
by MattRichWarren on Feb 17, 2010 11:30 AM EST up reply actions
You guys think Chad can actually throw at the Ralph?
I always felt that guy would look absolutely horrible here. Something about his ball flight (which is much like Trent’s, but I think a tad worse).
He's had plenty of success there before
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
Gailey’s repeated use of the word "production" leads me to believe we’ll be seeing someone like Pennington as starter.
As in production is the most important factor.
Trent will be lucky to beat out Brohm for #3.
Despite hacing much better production, Trent will be behind Brohm?
That’s the contradiction.
YES WE CHAN!
Tweet
Your daily source for Buffalo Bills information.
by MattRichWarren on Feb 18, 2010 9:19 AM EST up reply actions
I would agree with that statement.
Fitz is far from good. The reason he looked better was that he was taking very inaccurate pokes down field. A few long bombs to TO made everyone forget how inaccurate he was.
I think Edwards is a smart QB but unfortunately he has proven to me that is arm strength is weak. Still, many very good QBs have been successful without a canon arm, so maybe there’s hope. At this point my expectations are quite low for 2010, let Chan prove his worth, let him show us that he can salvage Trent Edwards’ career.
Nothing left to say... the clock is ticking...
Say NO to Trent
Nothing against the guy personnelly, seems like a fine young man. I don’t look at him as a quality backup yet alone a starter. First of he is fragile, like Rob Johnson looks like a iron man compared to him. Second, he has a weak arm for the long throw. Third, no self confidence, lost this way to quickly. All these things are out of his control so he is useless to the Buffalo Bills.
NO PROBLEM, WHATEVER, Work Is For People Who Don't Know How To Fish!
Benefit of practicing against a 3-4
There definitely needs to be a QB competition to name the new QB, no hand-outs! Its possible Edwards could regain some poise if the line is improved and he can practice against our 3-4 defense all training camp. But he would have to prove it.
Still need to find a long term franchise QB though.
I was listening to Sirius NFL radio and...
Jim Miller (who was a part of the 1990’s Pittsburgh teams that Gailey was OC for) said that he thinks Edwards is the “perfect fit” for Chan Gailey’s system. He went on to justify that with the fact that he’s a good, athletic decision maker. Mills is usually right on the money with his breakdowns and he has a very uniquely apt point of view on the subject. Personally if there were a 3 way competition between the current QBs on our roster, Brohm would ultimately win it in my opinion based on the chip on his shoulder and that would be fine by me. I don’t want to draft a QB in the first round unless it is indeed Bradford. Otherwise I’d rather have a Tebow, Lefeavour, or Snead in the appropriate round.
Edwards may seem fragile, btw, based on his tenure on the injury report, but I’m pretty sure any QB in the known universe who took either of his concussion hits would have missed equal time, especially last year getting bent over like a cheap suitcase. I’m more inclined to doubt his long term viability as the starter based on the shell-shocked nature he’s developed over time.
Also, for those of you using the “his teammates won’t stand for him being named the starter” argument, I can envision no scenario in which Gailey would just name him the starter sans competition in the first place. He’s done nothing to warrant such a designation, and even if he was somehow named the starter tomorrow, it’s not like he can’t earn back the trust of his teammates by winning a couple games and playing well again.
Jim Miller
Someone needs to explain where the Trent Edwards is a a “good decision maker” cliche comes from…is it purely his Stanford background? After three years, that label is nothing but hogwash from lazy journalists who haven’t watched him play.
Aaron Maybin is DeMarcus Ware 2.0.
I think Edwards is ruined as a potential NFL
However, if he’s on the roster next season he does deserve a shot at the starting QB job. I hope he’s not on the roster at the beginning of next season. I believe it would be in both the Bill’s and Edward’s best interest to part ways. However I can envision him on the roster,and having some success behind a healthy O line,until he takes his first monster hit and reverts into Trentative mode.
Maybe
but jauron had no clue about what he needed in the OC position. that’s the biggest issue and hopefully it won’t repeat.
I agree he should get a chance.
Mixed Approach
Somewhere between “win with what you’ve got” (Gailey) and “bring in a guy who has won before… because he’ll probably continue to win,” (Nix) is wat I expect to see.
I think they’ll trade for a veteran QB who has won in the league and let him compete with Trent and Fitzpatrick for the start. If Edwards loses that competition, he’ll be jettisoned.
When I was younger and more emotionally invested in this team, this kind of news would have worn on me substantially. Now? I’ll just sick back hope it’s all media speculation from a newspaper that never seems to have any beat writers who actually have a grip on the team’s pulse. Maybe Gaughan right, but for now, I’ll just hope he’s being lazy in his reporting because the media that covers the Bills locally never seems to break any stories surrounding the team.
If it IS true, that will just about do it for me regarding true concern for this morbid franchise. I tried to be optimistic about the iffy Nix and Gailey choices with reagrds to fixing the absolute joke that was the Dick Jauron era, but keeping Trent Edwards as anything more than a training camp arm would be absolute lunacy for this new braintrust. The author of this post is correct in his assessment of how some Bills’ fans (including me) view Trent Edwards. I personally despise him more than any Bills QB I’ve ever suffered through (including bums like Rob Johnson, Ryan Fitzpatrick, Kelly Holcomb, and JP Losman). I hate his overall comfort with poor performances, his unwarranted sense of self worth, and most importantly, his anemic on field production. I will not sit and watch another year of Trent Edwards under any circumstance and while I’m a Bills’ supporter for life, I won’t waste my time watching a story unfold that has no other possible outcome but failure. Trent Edwards has never shown anything to warrant a place in an NFL lineup despite being handed a job by Dick Jauron and company based on absolutely nothing. Everything you need to know about Trent Edwards is already in the history books. He’s no better than Stoney Case, Will Furrer, Kyle Boller, Browning Nagle, or any of the worst QBs in recent memory. He belongs on his couch back in California on Sundays that’s exactly where this coaching staff will be in the near future if Edwards is their answer at QB.
Aaron Maybin is DeMarcus Ware 2.0.
Stoney Case
Great name drop!
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
What a Mess this post has turned into.
Personnaly, I quess thats what reporter shoot for is stirring hypothetical scenerio’s to stirr the pot. Everyone here has fallen for it.
Why can’t we be patient and wait for what we all asked for. Let Gailey and his staff evaluate what we have on the roster. Let Nix and his staff along with Gailey and his offensive staff evaluate the combine. Let them decide which is best for this franchise and then let the chips fall.
This is our biggest advantage we have. We asked for this overhaul, we got some good evaluaters to perform this process for us. We couldn’t get much younger with the talent we have at the QB position. We don’t have an offensive scheme in place and we are picking what we should do at that position. This is rediculous.
Let the front office do their job. I just hope somewhere in the evaluation they realize we need a running game to compliment our QB. Then we can have at least something on the offensive side of the ball to identify with.
This is like dumping a new puzzle from it's box. Now let's start putting the peices together. I guess this is what we all asked for.
I can see trent as a “Dilfer”…Don’t throw the ball away type of player. I’m OK with that. (For now…)
"This is what happens Larry!, This is what happens! "-Walter Sobchak
by BigEasyBillsKrewe on Feb 16, 2010 3:02 PM EST reply actions
How many times__
have the Bills been rebuilding? Over and Over again weve been through this__ I think trent has been runined plane and simple, I hope Im wrong .
hand Edwards the starting job? ha ha ha.....
he wont even be on the roster!!!
most of my posts get deleted :(
Since we won't be signing/trading for a big FA QB.......
Let’s stir the pot a little more.
Barring somebody is crazy enough to give us a draft pick for Trent…..
TONIGHT, PROFILED ON THE NASHVILLE NEWS:
Not invited to the combine, working out, and will certainly go loooooowww in the draft or completly undrafted, here he is folks!
Jonathan Crompton. 6-4, 228 from UT.
He played for 3 or 4 O-coordinators, played part time for 3 seasons with bad UT teams, and then finally had a good year as a senior as a starter (with a marginal UT team).
2008 Tennessee (5-7) 8 86 167 51.5 889 5.3 111.1 4 5
2009 Tennessee (7-6) 13 224 384 58.3 2800 7.3 215.4 27 13
We bring to camp Trent-Fitzy-Brohm.
Do we draft Crompton in the last round (or does somebody beat us to it) or sign him as an UFA?
We go into camp with FOUR young arms, let them duke it out with each getting their share of reps….. then, the one who sucks the most, gets cut or put on the practice squad, and the one who sucks the least, we start and keep the other two as backups.
We draft for need this year, then get a franchise QB (Locker) next year.
WAHOOOO!!! Go Bills.
"A failure becomes just one time at bat if you refuse to let it defeat you." Marv Levy.
by SERGEANT MAJOR THOR on Feb 16, 2010 8:48 PM EST reply actions
Uh oh
Somebody else likes Crompton now!
He’s definitely not going undrafted, or even in the 7th round. He’s a 4th-6th rounder, IMO.
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
I don't "like" Cromton......but I don't hate him.....
Just feeding fuel to the fire.
But, he could be a young guy worth developing since he showed significant progress in his first year of starting in the brutal SEC.
There is always a gem in the late round somewhere.
"A failure becomes just one time at bat if you refuse to let it defeat you." Marv Levy.
by SERGEANT MAJOR THOR on Feb 16, 2010 9:31 PM EST up reply actions
I think Jauron had this posted on the door frame coming out of the locker room
the one who sucks the least, we start and keep the other two as backups.
But in this case, I agree it is the best plan :-)
If we end up with Vick, T.O., Richie I., and Porter….that is really pushing the dbag density limit for one team.
by Joe P. on Feb 16, 2010 9:14 PM EST up reply actions 3 recs
Oh, nanny!
That made me laugh out loud. In my mind, I am rolling around on the floor, laughing. Not at Jauron…with Jauron.
a.k.a. Undee
Kid needs a set of nuts
I think Trent could work out if he did the following
- Kick his sister out of the house
- Bang random babes
Unfortunetly, something tells me he’s out west right now….in a yoga class.
Well, you all know what I think
… wait, I’m not very well known on this board, at least yet. So I guess I’ll have to reiterate, that I think that unless Buddy can get Clausen, and feels confident enough that he can get a decent left tackle and nose tackle, then we’d do better to address those two subjects and sign Pennington to compete with Fitz for starter (as well as possibly slotting into the ‘mentor’ role for Brohm and another prospect); and at this stage, I would not quote odds on who gets the nod.
But as for Trent getting the job back — I can’t say I see it happening. Not after his record from last year, no matter what the cause, I can’t see him getting his confidence back. Whereas Fitz at least seems to have had a clear head about him, and was able to take a few risks here and there (as opposed to doing the check-down cha-cha almost every play, like Trent was doing every time I saw him). I don’t think he’s great, and as a matter of fact think ‘adequate’ is a compliment under the circumstances, but it’s not one I could give Trent Edwards last year.
are you saying
that if the Bills are up at pick 9 and Jimmy Clausen or Sam Bradford are there you will want the Bills to pass on them for Bulaga or Davis at LT?
Just trying to gauge how you feel about this years QB class in the draft.
"you just have to know there's always going to be adversity. None of these games are going to be easy. Nothing will be given to us" - Paul Posluszny
Brian,
I not convinced that we know how good Edwards is at this point. I’ll give you that he hasn’t been the same since the hit he took against the Cardinals last year. If we could plug him behind New Englands O-line for a few starts we’d know. I suspect he’d be a winner there.
by Lancaster66 on Feb 18, 2010 8:55 AM EST via mobile reply actions
Ha – you mean the same Pats O-Line that got Tom Brady annihilated in their Wild Card loss?
I don’t buy the whole Cardinals hit theory, either. He’s had good games since then.
I’m not convinced we know how good Edwards is, either, but simply handing him the job would be career suicide for Gailey and Nix.
Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott
by Brian Galliford on Feb 18, 2010 10:31 AM EST up reply actions

by 






















