Web Rumblings: Buffalo Bills Links, 2/22
Bills Need QB - But Not in 1st Round | WGRZ.com
Ed Kilgore doesn't like the idea of Michael Vick in Buffalo and he hopes Trent Edwards gets another shot at being the QB. He also looks at the holes at offensive and defensive tackle spots and thinks the Bills should address those early then go after a Dan LeFevour or Tim Tebow in the draft.
John Clayton's Mailbag | ESPN.com
"What I'm puzzled about more than anything is the [Bills'] decision to go to a 3-4 defense. No doubt the Bills have been pulverized when they play 3-4 defenses, and that's a big problem because three AFC East teams play the 3-4. But making the switch only adds to their needs." He goes on to say he thinks too many teams are switching to the 3-4 than the available personnel can support.
MMQB - Peter King - SI.com
Peter King puts the last three WRs elected to the HOF against the three guys in a logjam to get in including Andre Reed. Suffice to say that Cris Carter, Tim Brown, and Reed all belong but King questions if voters put too much emphasis on Super Bowl wins helping a guy like Michael Irvin in but preventing the other three from earning enshrinement.
Team News
CANOE -- SLAM! Sports - CFL - Toronto: Argonauts release Joseph
The Toronto Argonauts have released two QBs and are apparently interested in signing Bills RFA Gibran Hamdan.
Bills' roster figures to be improved | Olean Times Herald
Chuck Pollack recaps where the Bills roster stands heading into the offseason.
How will NFL coaches react? – Inside The Bills
"The Washington Post write up indicates that while the number of offseason practices might be the same, that practices involving contact could be reduced by 20 to 25 percent. There’s not a whole lot of contact to begin with in offseason practices as most are conducted in helmets and shorts."
Time for GMs to make some tough calls on QB issues - NFL.com
Bucky Brooks looks at the QB position heading into free agency.
This Day in Buffalo Sports History: Bruce! - Sports Ink! - Buffalo News
On this date in 1985 the Bills signed number one pick Bruce Smith well before the draft. Bill Polian was credited with the selection, negotiation, and signing.
2010 NFL Draft and Free Agency
Free Agent Files: Chad Pennington : Buffalo Sports Daily
BSD continues profiling potential free agents with QB Chad Pennington.
Bills Need QB - But Not in 1st Round | WGRZ.com
Ed Kilgore doesn't like the idea of Michael Vick in Buffalo and he hopes Trent Edwards gets another shot at being the QB. He also looks at the holes at offensive and defensive tackle spots and thinks the Bills should address those early then go after a Dan LeFevour or Tim Tebow in the draft.
Allen Wilson's first mock draft of 2010 : Buffalo Bills : The Buffalo News
With Jimmy Clausen (No. 4), Russell Okung (No. 5), Sam Bradford (No. 6), and Anthony Davis (No. 8) off the board, Wilson has the Bills taking Iowa tackle Bryan Bulaga.
Big-name prospects under the microscope | National Football Post
NFP begins their combine coverage by looking at some guys the Bills might be interested in; Jimmy Clausen, Sam Bradford, and Terrence Cody.
29 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
John Clayton actually making some sense.........
go figure.
-Buffalo Rumblings resident Chan Gailey basher-
by norcaliangelsfan on Feb 22, 2010 10:23 AM EST reply actions
Funny I sort of disagree with Clayton. Actually I agree with him that Gailey created a bigger list of needs by forcing the conversion to a 3-4 right away but in fact it makes sense to get it out of the way in year 1 while there are no real expectations. If he waits another year or two it might never happen. The team will struggle in 2010 – fine. We will be in a decent draft position again in 2011 and then hopefully in 2012 we can get back to the playoffs
Nothing left to say... the clock is ticking...
Well I dont disagree with you.....
but I was just shocked mostly that Clayton made a logical argument……for once.
-Buffalo Rumblings resident Chan Gailey basher-
by norcaliangelsfan on Feb 23, 2010 3:17 PM EST up reply actions
No he actually does not
Clayton goes no deeper than the surface when reporting on football and his opinions to me are mostly fluff. His assertion that it was a dumb move to go to the 3-4 is so short-sighted it makes me laugh, and his backing up that point with the fact that ‘Kyle Williams might not have a position’ is ludicrous. We haven’t won anything with our current players, not even close. To continually fault Gailey (whom he is still blasting as non-exciting – cuz that’s what really wins games John, an exciting hire) for switching schemes just because our current crappy personnel doesn’t fit is pathetic. But since he’s at ESPN we’ll all continue to listen to him.
But… but… but… Kyle Williams isn’t suited for any position in the 3-4. And Clayton’s point is that so many teams have made the switch in recent years that finding capable players, specifically NTs and DEs, is really hard. He’s right about all that.
YES WE CHAN!
Tweet
Your daily source for Buffalo Bills information.
by MattRichWarren on Feb 22, 2010 2:21 PM EST up reply actions
Unfortunately, I agree. If the 3-4 works here, it won’t matter, but I hope their reasons for using it extend beyond the “it’s hard to prepare for” argument.
Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott
by Brian Galliford on Feb 22, 2010 2:57 PM EST up reply actions
finding capable players, specifically NTs and DEs, is really hard.
throwing it out there – but wouldn’t it be easier? not the transition – but to find guys ilke this.
the NT is tough for sure – but 3/4 DE’s can be found because they aren’t typically asked to be penetrators.
then with LB’s – a TON of guys have that makeup and can be more versatile (ST). so instead of trying to find 2 quality pass rushing DEs and 2 quality DTs we can find 1 NT, 2 DEs that have to occupy blockers and a bunch of LBs that seem to be, well everywhere.
i might be a little off on that – but past NT – seems like the 3-4 might be easier to draft for.
Hello - thanks for reading my signature. It's very interesting. Bye
by J2 on Feb 22, 2010 4:17 PM EST up reply actions
Clayton went into it more than I did. Read the whole article if you haven’t.
YES WE CHAN!
Tweet
Your daily source for Buffalo Bills information.
by MattRichWarren on Feb 22, 2010 4:33 PM EST up reply actions
I read it – but i was asking the community if it’s easier to draft for a 3-4 than a 4-3
Hello - thanks for reading my signature. It's very interesting. Bye
by J2 on Feb 22, 2010 4:45 PM EST up reply actions
Given our history at drafting 4-3 defenders, it would have to be easier to draft 3-4 guys
If we end up with Vick, T.O., Richie I., and Porter….that is really pushing the dbag density limit for one team.
by Joe P. on Feb 22, 2010 5:28 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
not to blow up against Chan Gailey again......
but there is nothing about the guy that is exciting……..especially his previous track record.
-Buffalo Rumblings resident Chan Gailey basher-
by norcaliangelsfan on Feb 22, 2010 3:52 PM EST up reply actions
What do you mean there's nothing exciting about Chan Gailey?
I mean, there’s that Super Bowl he won as head coach…………, wait, no, that playoff win he was head coach for………………….., hold on, no, that national champtionship he lead Georgia Tech to in college…………………nope, um………wait for it……………..I’m still thinking……………ah, I know, he was offensive coordinator when the Kansas City Chiefs went 2-14 in 2008, but Tyler Thigpen showed some improvement and is now a favorite target of many here on this website!
by StroudFanClub on Feb 22, 2010 7:22 PM EST up reply actions
I had the same thoughts as John
Until K pointed out that it is the perfect time to make the switch. If we are going to go to rebuild mode, go all in. I trust it won’t be as complex as fans such as myself see it, but the glass is alot less than half full now, IMO.
This is like dumping a new puzzle from it's box. Now let's start putting the peices together. I guess this is what we all asked for.
K is right. All in baby!
Besides, Nix and Gailey did not inspire any major expectations for the future so it’s the perfect time to start over.
Nothing left to say... the clock is ticking...
by keysh67 on Feb 23, 2010 2:46 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Hey Joe
K is right.
Can you put that one in your Rumblings’ quotes library?
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
Hmmmmmm...maybe if we add
K is right. All in baby! TWSS
If we end up with Vick, T.O., Richie I., and Porter….that is really pushing the dbag density limit for one team.
I agree with Van
You could make the argument that staying with the 4-3 for one more year then switching next year, makes the Bills a more competitive team. This year they could focus solely on the offense and next year focus solely on the defense.
With all due respects to Mr Clayton to fixing both, this allows you to draft the BPA (at almost any position) since we need so many holes filled. It’s going to be a 2 year rebuild (at minimum) anyway, why not get your current personnel up to speed on the systems you will run, filling in the holes as you go.
good point!
this allows you to draft the BPA (at almost any position)
and still draft need
Nothing left to say... the clock is ticking...
3-4 players are EASIER to find
Every year I think Clayton becomes more and more of a hack.
Besides franchise QBs, franchise 4-3 DEs are the hardest personnel to find in the draft. We’ve already covered on this site the many variations and permutations of the 3-4 that give it flexibility with regard to the NT position – maybe he should read more and speak less.
3-4 players are EASIER to find
I disagree. I think 4-3 DEs are hard to find, sure. But so are 3-4 pass rushing OLBs. It’s essentially the same position.
What Clayton and I have been saying is the Nose Tackle position, the single most important factor in the 3-4’s success, is hard to find. That why three of them are getting franchised this year. 3-4 NTs are harder to find than 4-3 DEs.
YES WE CHAN!
Tweet
Your daily source for Buffalo Bills information.
by MattRichWarren on Feb 23, 2010 9:49 AM EST up reply actions
How can you say that Nose is the hardest to find when you can get by in some 3-4 schemes with a big fat immovable object in there? They don’t have to be athletic, they just have to occupy blocks and eat up space.
What you mean is it’s hard to find a NT that can collapse the pocket and penetrate. That’s indeed very hard to find and those are the guys you are seeing getting tagged. But they are a luxory, but not a neccesity.
But so are 3-4 pass rushing OLBs. It’s essentially the same position.
I don’t think this holds up.
The vast majorioty of pass rushing ends in college come into the league as “tweeners” who need to bulk-up to be effective against the run – ala Maybin. It’s much more rare to find a kid who is ~20 years old who has the athleticism to beat a professional tackle on the edge yet be stout enough to hold up against the run.
Buffalo has time-and-time again had to trade off between guys who could rush the passer and guys who could hold up against the run, and eventually settled for guys who were mediocre at one or both. With the exception of Schobel who was a freakish athlete – which is what the 4-3 end position calls for.
The 3-4 spreads these roles better and allows you to get-by with less than freakish athletes in your front 3. That’s reason #2 why we are making the switch after all. Reason #1 being the variability of scheme.
How can you say that Nose is the hardest to find when you can get by in some 3-4 schemes with a big fat immovable object in there?
The Chiefs made the transition to 3-4 last year and they had former Bill Ron Edwards start games for them.
The 3-4 NT has to cover two gaps with the possibility of three blockers, the center and both guards, taking shots and him not to mention a lead blocker.
Here’s a couple articles to read about the difficulty of finding a stud NT:
http://www.palmbeachpost.com/sports/dolphins/replacing-a-nose-tackle-in-nfl-is-no-83927.html
http://www.nfl.com/kickoff/story?id=09000d5d8124eb61&template=without-video-with-comments&confirm=true
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3-4_defense
YES WE CHAN!
Tweet
Your daily source for Buffalo Bills information.
by MattRichWarren on Feb 23, 2010 4:19 PM EST up reply actions
Did you read the whole thing?
Most personnel people would tell you that it is easier to find two-gap linemen that can play in the NFL than it is to find great one-gap penetrators, which is one thing that is appealing about a 3-4.
It’s easier to find, as you called it, “big fat immovable object” type guys who can hold down space. If that’s what you’re going for, fine. I want a guy who actually does mroe than occupy two blockers. :-)
YES WE CHAN!
Tweet
Your daily source for Buffalo Bills information.
by MattRichWarren on Feb 24, 2010 9:15 AM EST up reply actions
Dominant 4-3 DT's aren't exactly easy to come by either....
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
You are absolutely right, in a 4-3 the DTs must be stout and dominant. In a 3-4, tweener DTs can get recycled to DE, again providing a bit more flexibility at draft time IMO.
I am of the same opinion as Kgun201, I think the fact that it’s easier to recycle Tweeners to the OLB position and get great productivity from them than it is to find the perfect 4-3 DE.
I don’t think it is quite as difficult to find a fat guy to man the middle, maybe the elite guys that can stop the run AND blow-up the middle but the scheme can get by with just the run-blocking part.
I think we could debate this until we are blue in the face but again like Kgun201 said, it’s all academic now…
Nothing left to say... the clock is ticking...

by 


































