Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Knicks Beat Lakers With Familiar Strategy

Reid writes that the rumor is that the Redskins would send quarterback Jason Campbell to the Buffalo Bills for safety Donte Whitner and a draft pick.

almost 2 years ago Img_20110806_213313_tiny Brian Galliford 256 comments 0 recs  | 

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

Donte for someone else please

Man I would really not like this. On many levels.

New decade, New GM, New Coach, Jimmy Clausen? Could the ineptitude end?
The Official Draft Jimmy Clausen Bandwagon.

by SouthBuffaloNDgrad on Feb 25, 2010 2:05 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

also what draft pick

New decade, New GM, New Coach, Jimmy Clausen? Could the ineptitude end?
The Official Draft Jimmy Clausen Bandwagon.

by SouthBuffaloNDgrad on Feb 25, 2010 2:05 PM EST up reply actions  

Why not? We are STACKED at safety, and Campbell is a legit QB, who could be a franchise QB if used properly. This is a good deal.

The more I see, the les I know.

by CanadianBillsFan on Feb 25, 2010 4:09 PM EST up reply actions  

do you really think campbell is any better than trent edwards?

by LIBi on Feb 25, 2010 4:23 PM EST up reply actions  

Has Campbell been replaced by Ryan Fitzpatrick? No? Then I think he’s better, if only marginally. For me it depends on the pick…….

by bluecollarbuffalo on Feb 25, 2010 4:30 PM EST up reply actions  

Campbell got replaced by Todd Collins though.........

so…….take that into consideration.

"I have to bite my tongue not to ask how his wealth of experience with mediocrity is helping him prepare to make the Bills mediocre." - SB Nation's Peter Bean about Chan Gailey during the NFL Scouting Combine

by norcaliangelsfan on Feb 26, 2010 2:38 PM EST up reply actions  

I think that Trent is mediocre and that Campbell is somewhere between average and above average. So yes I would consider him an upgrade over Edwards. Not a significant upgrade, but a good enough of an upgrade to attract Chix’s attention.

You also have to realise that Campbell is EXACTLY the type of QB that Chan likes to form an offense around.

The more I see, the les I know.

by CanadianBillsFan on Feb 25, 2010 4:35 PM EST up reply actions  

depends on the draft pick...

but otherwise why not? Campbell is a clear upgrade over what we had last year.

by Dime on Feb 25, 2010 4:39 PM EST up reply actions  

You're right

Cambell is the perfect fit for Chans type of offense, I mean he played Reggie Ball for 3 years. I have began to feel if Buffalo feels that they don’t want to draft a QB, then they should make this trade, I say give them our 6th. He’s better than Trent, he’s stronged armed, mobile, and seems intelligent. Looking at his completion % and other stats I was rather impressed, he had young weapons and was still able to complete 64% of his passes. I loved him at Auburn and liked him years ago but after watching him he never showed he was great. He’s better than any QB on our roster and I don’t care about “bad pursuit angle” Donte but would love if we got a pick also.

New decade, New GM, New Coach, Jimmy Clausen? Could the ineptitude end?
The Official Draft Jimmy Clausen Bandwagon.

by SouthBuffaloNDgrad on Feb 25, 2010 4:51 PM EST up reply actions  

STACKED?

We have two safeties under contract in Byrd and Whitner….

~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."

by Kurupt on Feb 26, 2010 12:29 AM EST up reply actions  

I’m assuming that we re-sign both Scott and Wilson. If either one is released then we should keep Whitner.

The more I see, the les I know.

by CanadianBillsFan on Feb 26, 2010 12:37 AM EST up reply actions  

I assume the same will happen

But I wouldn’t say this is a stacked unit quite yet. Scott and Wilson are solid vets, and Byrd is a rookie, albeit Pro Bowler, that has a lot of cracks to fix in his game. Whitner is what he is, not much. It’s a respectable unit, but I’m not using the word stacked to describe it….

~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."

by Kurupt on Feb 26, 2010 1:00 AM EST up reply actions  

I think that Whitner is our best backup in both safety positions, with Scott being the best run stopper and Wilson being the best overall safety. With Byrd in the mix I’d say that we’d be stacked if we kept all 4.

The more I see, the les I know.

by CanadianBillsFan on Feb 26, 2010 1:06 AM EST up reply actions  

Again

I have a different understanding of stacked in this regard.

When I think of some team being stacked at a position, I think of Oklahoma State with Thurman Thomas and Barry Sanders at RB or even something more simplistic like the Steelers with Rush LB’s in Harrison, Woodley and Timmons.

I just can’t say that a team that has four average or above average safeties is stacked at the position. Deep? yes.

~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."

by Kurupt on Feb 26, 2010 1:44 AM EST up reply actions  

pass

pass pass pass, passss. oh yeah, i’d pass on this one. maybe if the pick was on their side of the deal. even still… pass

Later Losman!

by rockybillboa on Feb 25, 2010 2:05 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

Just posted a link to this myself. :-P Only I went to Reid’s website. He also says his sources say it won’t happen.

by MattRichWarren on Feb 25, 2010 2:09 PM EST reply actions   2 recs

I posted this as a Fanshot probably 5 minutes ago

Once I realized that Brian already had it on the front page I deleted it. Damn Brian you are fast.

by The Irishman on Feb 25, 2010 2:41 PM EST up reply actions  

campbell

he might be a small upgrade over what we have but the goal is not to be mediocre its to win a championship. theres only one winner every season.

by RaleighforBills on Feb 25, 2010 2:09 PM EST reply actions  

Yea but Campbell put up pretty good stats, and had the worst OL in the NFL. Yea i do know Bills have an awful line, but they can draft Bulaga,Davis,Okung in the 1st round and maybe another OL in the 3-4 round range, and we aren’t rushed into drafting a QB this draft…Plus anyone know what this pick will be?

"Tigers love pepper... they hate cinnamon"- The Hangover

by atlantalove on Feb 25, 2010 3:25 PM EST up reply actions  

Why give up a draft pick and a semi-decent safety for a slug? We have 3 or 4 on our roster that “could” be what Chan wants at QB. I mean, really? Give up a starter and a pick for a QB that is in the lower 15% of starting QB’s in the league? The guy is horrible. We already have that caliber on our roster. Might as well go to war with Fitz. At least he is a smart guy with heart.

"If winning isn't everything, why do they keep score?"
~Vince Lombardi~

by Hambone on Feb 25, 2010 7:40 PM EST up reply actions  

Hey Bri,

Add a poll……..

by Pablo Escobar on Feb 25, 2010 2:11 PM EST reply actions  

Durrrrr

No thanks unless it’s just straight up for Whitner. Or Whitner and a future pick.

I think Campbell has pretty much reached his ceiling. He’s an ok NFL QB, but I don’t think he’s anything you can win with.

Now if the Redskins are actually interested in Whitner, a trade of him for a mid round pick could actually happen.

Or maybe Whitner for Orakpo :)
Or Whitner for Mike Williams and Derrick Dockery :(

~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."

by Kurupt on Feb 25, 2010 2:11 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

Whitner for a few of Clinton Portis’ outfits…

a.k.a. Undee

by Undee on Feb 25, 2010 2:29 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

better than

anything we have and a perfect stop gap until we find the future answer.

MARVelous - "I went from America's team to North America's Team" Terrell Owens

by MARVelous on Feb 25, 2010 5:05 PM EST up reply actions  

If it’s less than a fourth I thinks it’s something to consider. It would give us a qb with some experince wich is huge need and allow us to focus on other needs

by Circle The Wagon on Feb 25, 2010 2:11 PM EST reply actions  

Nope. Campbell, Edwards, Fitzpatrick, and Brohm? I’m falling asleep just looking at that list. Just give me Hamden instead.

a.k.a. Undee

by Undee on Feb 25, 2010 2:15 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

I disagree K with the right pieces in place Campbell can take a team to the playoffs (ie) Trent Dilfer… Not to say we have a Ravens like D but anything is possible

by Circle The Wagon on Feb 25, 2010 2:16 PM EST reply actions  

I mean win a championship with

Well I suppose he could if he had a dominant defense, which we obviously won’t have for a few years, at least.

~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."

by Kurupt on Feb 25, 2010 2:49 PM EST up reply actions  

Is he not an upgrade? Don’t we QB? I think we should pick up Campbell draft defense this year and inthe future build around him. I not saying he’ll light the league on fire as a bill but he would give us a better chance to win in the future and in 2011. I think most of know next year will be a struggle regardless of who is QB but if gailey thinks Campbell can help lead us we should jump all over it

by Circle The Wagon on Feb 25, 2010 3:13 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes he is an upgrade

I just wouldn’t go in expecting a run at a championship. I also don’t want the Bills dealing anything of significant value for him either.

~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."

by Kurupt on Feb 25, 2010 3:14 PM EST up reply actions  

Baby steps K... baby steps

He would give us a fresh start and it would be a new start with him. Imean we are rebuilding right? What better ways to start with a young QB who already has starting exprience and has proven he’s belongs in this league as a starter. As for value a backup saftey and a late round pick (5th or lower) is pretty good deal if you ask me. But honestly I can’t watch trent and Ryan for another year there lay just makes me sick

by Circle The Wagon on Feb 25, 2010 3:32 PM EST up reply actions  

very true that.

He’s come close to taking Washington to the play offs a couple times, and im gonna stretch and say that Washington is a worse team than Buffalo. And not to mention Washington ha worse receivers thean Buffalo and he still put up better number than all of Buffalos QBs. Definately an upgrade. Should still pick up a QB in the draft tho.

by gatorempire127 on Feb 25, 2010 2:47 PM EST up reply actions  

How are Washington's WR's worse than ours??

Santana Moss and Lee Evans are pretty comparable, with Moss having accomplished a little more.

Randel El is more productive than Josh Reed.

Malcolm Kelly and Devin Thomas are both better than either James Hardy or Steve Johnson, and right now it’s probably not even close.

Fred Davis is a much more complete player than Shawn Nelson at this point, and obviously produced more in his starting role this year. And Chris Cooley is one of the better receiving TE’s in the NFL.

Also, I do think Campbell is much better than anything we’ve had in the past decade….

~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."

by Kurupt on Feb 25, 2010 2:54 PM EST up reply actions  

My how we forget

375 of 610, 4359 yards, 24 TDs, 61.5% completion percentage

2002 – Drew Bledsoe

by MattRichWarren on Feb 25, 2010 2:57 PM EST up reply actions  

I didn't forget

Bledsoe played a handful of good games. He started hot, but after that he was pretty awful. He was really no different than any of the other guys we’ve had roll through. He just put up better numbers.

~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."

by Kurupt on Feb 25, 2010 3:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Wow wow wow Bledsoe no better than Rob Jonhson PJ Losman or Trent Edwards...

Now I’m starting to think you would only be happy if we had Peyton Bress Rivers or so one in there company…

by Circle The Wagon on Feb 25, 2010 3:17 PM EST up reply actions  

And I never said that....

He was no different in the results and total impact on this team winning games.

Did any of you guys really like Bledsoe when he played here? Again, he started strong and was really, really mediocre afterward.

~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."

by Kurupt on Feb 25, 2010 3:25 PM EST up reply actions  

Haha

Then you must agree

~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."

by Kurupt on Feb 25, 2010 3:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Not entirly but you do have some good pionts and sorry for twisting your words not my intentions

by Circle The Wagon on Feb 25, 2010 3:37 PM EST up reply actions  

Aint't no thang

Didn’t think it was

~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."

by Kurupt on Feb 25, 2010 3:46 PM EST up reply actions  

LOL. Just saying we’ve had a Pro Bowl QB in the last decade.

by MattRichWarren on Feb 25, 2010 4:30 PM EST up reply actions  

Thats true.

Chris cooley was injured all of last year tho. and the Randel el comparison with josh reed in my opinion is a toss up, i think Randel el is way past his prime and josh reed is a good possession slot man. Plus Kelly and Thomas get more playing time than Hardy (injured) and Johnson (no idea why hes not that bad) so idk if you can compare that either, although i respect it. and i forgot all about Fred somehow.

by gatorempire127 on Feb 25, 2010 6:19 PM EST up reply actions  

too much… only whitner, no pick

Still waiting for the playoffs.... Go Bills 2010 !!!!

by killascript on Feb 25, 2010 2:17 PM EST reply actions  

Campbell is 2x the QB Edwards is

He’s not afraid to chuck the ball down the field for 1 thing. For another I’ve seen Campbell take a beating and not lose his composure. While he may not be great he is a very,very, poised young QB.

by mob16151 on Feb 25, 2010 3:04 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Agreed.

He’s done more with less. Or, roughly the same. Easily.

by FrankL on Feb 25, 2010 3:05 PM EST up reply actions  

+1

"Tigers love pepper... they hate cinnamon"- The Hangover

by atlantalove on Feb 25, 2010 3:27 PM EST up reply actions  

Agreed. Campbell is much better than Edwards, and would deffinatly be an upgrade for our team.

The more I see, the les I know.

by CanadianBillsFan on Feb 25, 2010 4:37 PM EST up reply actions  

Wrong!!!!!

How is Campbell an upgrade? What has he done in his 5 years? I mean, really? Are we talking numbers or POTENTIAL? I mean, come on folks. We are talking about, in my opinion, getting a 2nd string QB here for a starting safety and a pick? I say…HELL NO.

"If winning isn't everything, why do they keep score?"
~Vince Lombardi~

by Hambone on Feb 25, 2010 7:44 PM EST up reply actions  

Are we talking numbers or POTENTIAL

Numbers. Like how Campbell had the 15th best QB rating in the league last year and did it with one of the couple worst OLs, Santana Moss and a bunch of young guys as his receivers, in the toughest division in the league and with a pound it up the middle running attack that completely lacked explosion. For a guy in his situation, his 55 TD to 38 INT ratio is pretty solid. I’ll agree that Campbell isn’t all that good, but he’s obviously a considerable upgrade over the broken Edwards and the awful Fitzpatrick. If Campbell is a backup QB, then how many starters are there? 15? 20?

I signed up for Second Life about a year ago. Back then my life was so great that I literally wanted a second one. In my Second Life I was also a paper salesman and I was also named Dwight. Absolutely everything was the same. Except I could fly. - Dwight Schrute

by kaisertown on Feb 25, 2010 8:17 PM EST up reply actions  

By Hambone’s standards you’d think that there are only 10 legit starters in the league and the rest are all backups that happen to be starting.

The more I see, the les I know.

by CanadianBillsFan on Feb 25, 2010 8:38 PM EST up reply actions  

Please...Oh Please....

Let’s trade for a below average QB. Oh please! Lets move forward guys. Getting Campbell will only hinder a young re-building team. Again, he is NOT a leader.

"If winning isn't everything, why do they keep score?"
~Vince Lombardi~

by Hambone on Feb 25, 2010 8:47 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Why does trading for him hinder the team? I don’t think that commiting to a player long term is some kind of requirement when trading for a veteran player. Why can’t Buffalo find a guy like Campbell and still draft a QB this year or next year?

I signed up for Second Life about a year ago. Back then my life was so great that I literally wanted a second one. In my Second Life I was also a paper salesman and I was also named Dwight. Absolutely everything was the same. Except I could fly. - Dwight Schrute

by kaisertown on Feb 25, 2010 9:06 PM EST up reply actions  

Because

He won’t do anything that the QB"s we have now can do. Why waste the pick?

by buffalobacker on Feb 25, 2010 9:07 PM EST up reply actions  

You mean that having a QB that actually throws more TD’s then INT’s, has a completion percentage of close to 65, and consistantly throws over 3200 yards per year, all while playing behind a worst line than we had is a bad thing? I dunno man, I think I’d much rather have Campbell at QB than trent. And if it costs us Whitner (epic underacheiver) and a late round pick, we still come up a winner. So really, what’s the problem?

The more I see, the les I know.

by CanadianBillsFan on Feb 25, 2010 9:10 PM EST up reply actions  

Problem Is

If he’s all that why put him on market? He must have something wrong that leading to his trade. Just sounds to good to be true.. kinda gun shy!!!

by buffalobacker on Feb 25, 2010 9:16 PM EST up reply actions  

i think the real issue for Campbell in Washington

is that Dan Snyder never wanted him and always wanted to dump him. Remember last off-season he actively tried to get Jay Culter and Mark Sanchez to replace him. Then Campbell has a good individual year of improvement but the team collapses under Zorn. Dan Snyder has always been a vain man and I think, being unwilling to say he may be wrong on Campbell still wants to complete the task he failed at last off-season which is replacing his QB.

Some think Shanny might even be trying to override Snyder to keep Campbell so he can focus on building the o-line at pick 4.

"you just have to know there's always going to be adversity. None of these games are going to be easy. Nothing will be given to us" - Paul Posluszny

by poz on Feb 25, 2010 9:20 PM EST up reply actions  

Well Then

Get him while we can, like some have explained he has all the strengths that were Trent’s weaknesses. I’m just a little weary… We need alot!

by buffalobacker on Feb 25, 2010 9:24 PM EST up reply actions  

its always good to be wary

I am a bit wary of it too. But I think Donte Whitner and a late pick would be a small price to pay to let him compete with Trent for the starting gig. George Wilson and Bryan Scott are well equipped to replace Donte and losing a 6th or 7th doesnt faze me that much.

"you just have to know there's always going to be adversity. None of these games are going to be easy. Nothing will be given to us" - Paul Posluszny

by poz on Feb 25, 2010 9:37 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

To add to it he would remove the need to draft a 1st round QB this season if he gets the starting job. I know QB is an aching draft need but with the new D, I’d much rather see the Bills pick up a QB like Campbell and work on the line and 3-4 in the draft this season. If we do badly and can afford a good QB in the draft next year, all’s still well.

I call it... The Avaslug!
I am the 1st and probably only official member of the David "Dr." Jones fanclub.

Syracuse Basketball 2010: Making Hoya's cry.

by UZ on Feb 26, 2010 4:17 AM EST up reply actions  

I think this is the best argument you can make for Campbell. I still haven’t made up my mind on him but I’m gonna rec your comment.

by MattRichWarren on Feb 26, 2010 11:05 AM EST up reply actions  

Exactly

I was just typing the exact same thing. He is not a big enough name for Snyder.

by The Irishman on Feb 25, 2010 9:24 PM EST up reply actions  

yea Snyder

doesnt get enough credit for knowing absolutely nothing about football.

"you just have to know there's always going to be adversity. None of these games are going to be easy. Nothing will be given to us" - Paul Posluszny

by poz on Feb 25, 2010 9:38 PM EST up reply actions  

New coaching staffs mean new QBs. Poz mentions Cutler who was traded when McDaniels took over. Mangini and the Jets straight up cut Chad Pennington. New coaches regularly dump the starting QB to shake things up, take control of the team and implement their own mentality and schemes on the roster.

I signed up for Second Life about a year ago. Back then my life was so great that I literally wanted a second one. In my Second Life I was also a paper salesman and I was also named Dwight. Absolutely everything was the same. Except I could fly. - Dwight Schrute

by kaisertown on Feb 25, 2010 9:25 PM EST up reply actions  

HAHA!!!!

Campbell isn’t a starting QB, but Donte Whitner is a starting safety….Haha

~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."

by Kurupt on Feb 26, 2010 12:36 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

+1

heheh.

I call it... The Avaslug!
I am the 1st and probably only official member of the David "Dr." Jones fanclub.

Syracuse Basketball 2010: Making Hoya's cry.

by UZ on Feb 26, 2010 4:18 AM EST up reply actions  

I thought our goal in the off season is to try and improve. Campbell is an upgrade to Qb position wich is the most important player on the field. If we’re only giving up a back up safety and a late round pick for a starting QB then it’s a good deal any way you spin it

by Circle The Wagon on Feb 25, 2010 2:26 PM EST reply actions  

Depends

If you consider Campbell a upgrade or not.

by buffalobacker on Feb 25, 2010 2:28 PM EST reply actions  

over the QBs already on the roster? probably not. Over Whitner at safety? Maybe.

by tm on Feb 25, 2010 2:47 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

We are talking about buffalo right? A team with a career back up a fraglie stater with no balls and a project in Brom. Campbell is a definte upgrade

by Circle The Wagon on Feb 25, 2010 2:32 PM EST reply actions  

If it is a later round pick and Witner I would do it in a second. Campbell has improved every year despite playing in a new system each year. He has all the tools to be a solid QB. He would be a welcomed improvement compared to what is on our roster and he is only 28. I would rather take him over the likes of Bulger, Pennington, Orton, Vick or even McNabb.

He has been given much less talent in DC than what we have given QBs in Buffalo the past few years. Playing behind our line would be a big improvment for him after looking up from his back at Mike Williams 43 times last year!

by PDel22 on Feb 25, 2010 2:38 PM EST up reply actions  

Campbell over McNabb? Buffalo’s line is a “big improvement?”

a.k.a. Undee

by Undee on Feb 25, 2010 3:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes – I would rather have a young QB with potential than a 34 year old QB with a very large contract and on the decline. Reality is that the Bills are probably not going to be in contention next year or even the year after. I would not want to sacrafice a 2-3rd pick for a guy like McNabb when the team is in flux. I want them to build for two year from now, not two days.

Not sure how much you watched the Skins last year. I now live down in the Balt/DC area and watched way too many Skins/Ravens games. They could not pass or run block. they also have many injuries as well. Campbell was sacked 43 times and was often running for his life. He still was able to remain health and completed over 64% of his passes.

by PDel22 on Feb 25, 2010 3:26 PM EST up reply actions   2 recs

Buffalo Line is on the upswing compared to DC

I’m with PDel22. I live in the DC area too, and a healthy Bills line is a big upgrade from Washington. Plus, Buffalo’s line, as a whole, is much younger. Better chance for cementing talent into a cohesive line. Washington is a mess.

by FrankL on Feb 25, 2010 3:34 PM EST up reply actions  

The youth point is a good one.

a.k.a. Undee

by Undee on Feb 25, 2010 3:34 PM EST up reply actions  

I hear you on McNabb’s cost. I would still take McNabb, but I can’t argue with your reasoning for choosing Campbell, except that McNabb will likely still be playing in two years as well.

I didn’t watch too many Skins games, and I know that they are reputed to have one of the poorest lines, but I just don’t think it’s accurate to say Buffalo represents a big improvement.

a.k.a. Undee

by Undee on Feb 25, 2010 3:34 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes – I would rather have a young QB with potential than a 34 year old QB with a very large contract and on the decline.

Rec’d just for that line.

The more I see, the les I know.

by CanadianBillsFan on Feb 25, 2010 4:38 PM EST up reply actions  

I've heard the Skins line be called "The Bills Rejects".

So yeah, improvement, if only slight :)

I call it... The Avaslug!
I am the 1st and probably only official member of the David "Dr." Jones fanclub.

Syracuse Basketball 2010: Making Hoya's cry.

by UZ on Feb 26, 2010 4:19 AM EST up reply actions  

hmmm

I think were putting to much blame on QB play. Let’s give whomever is gonna be QB a better supporting cast, as well as new schemes and see how that pans out. Not to mention we could use a pick this yr. on QB. Bottom line we have to many needs than to trade away picks this year.

by buffalobacker on Feb 25, 2010 2:46 PM EST up reply actions  

But with Campbell we no longer have to waste a high level pick this season on a QB. It’s basically spending a 5th or 6th rounder on an experienced QB with potential. We can always get our QB next year in the draft if he doesn’t pan out as much as we’d hoped. To be fair this QB class is REALLY weak after Clausen and Bradford.

I call it... The Avaslug!
I am the 1st and probably only official member of the David "Dr." Jones fanclub.

Syracuse Basketball 2010: Making Hoya's cry.

by UZ on Feb 26, 2010 4:21 AM EST up reply actions  

Whitner..

should definitely be moved if we can get decent value for him. I am not sure if Campbell is ‘decent value’ for him, but if Chix believe Campbell can be a long term solution at QB for us, then we should pull the trigger if the offer is there. Donte is not a bad player and I am not going to bash him. But, I firmly believe Wilson is a better safety than Donte, and we should try to get value for Donte while he still has some. He’ll be a free agent next year and we’ll get nothing in return for him. So we should do all we can to get value for him right now.

by CBATL32 on Feb 25, 2010 2:37 PM EST reply actions  

I think that Campbell would qualify as good value in Chix’s eyes because he’s exactly the type of QB that Gailey likes to form his offenses around. Big arm, semi-mobile with upside.

I’m not saying that Campbell would be a Pro-Bowler for us, simply that he’d be perfect for Chan’s system.

The more I see, the les I know.

by CanadianBillsFan on Feb 25, 2010 4:40 PM EST up reply actions  

Jason Campbell

I think he has upside still. He has never had any continuity in his career. 3 different OC’s in Aurburn, 3 different OC’s in Washington. He has a big arm, is mobile, and has played well at times in the pros behind a suspect O-line. He is also tough. The last two years he was forced to try to work in a West-Coast offense. The is a perfect example of a square peg round hole. I think he could be a solid starter in a heavy run-based, play-action type offense.

by The Irishman on Feb 25, 2010 2:49 PM EST reply actions  

I agree w/ you about Campbell, but I dont want to give up a pick...

If it is a 7th, then fine, but other than that, trade draft position, but dont give up a pick.

by NorCal BillsFan on Feb 25, 2010 2:52 PM EST up reply actions  

i would be fine with this as long as the pick is like 6-7th and we invest heavily in the o-line, like bulaga with the 9th overall pick

by billsnterps on Feb 25, 2010 2:54 PM EST reply actions  

IN. A. HEARTBEAT.

I’ve been living in DC for 8 years now, and I’ve watched my fair share of J. Cam on Redskins TV. Trust me, one thing that has gotten me through the last 10 years of Bills futility is having a good laugh at the Redskins every chance I can get.

I would take Jason Campbell tomorrow, in a heartbeat, 100 times out of 100. His stats do not begin to reflect the type of player he is. Anything things he is Trent Edwards+ hasn’t seen enough of Campbell’s play. Unlike Edwards who completely folded behind a terrible line with underachieving wide recievers, Campbell has been able to squeak quite a bit out behind an equally bad line with probably even worse wide recievers.

He stays healthy. He gets right back up and throws again. He doesn’t really make a lot of mistakes. He’s had 10,000 OCs in three years and frankly has made the most of it.

He is a head, if not head and shoulders, better than anyone else on the roster and it seems like a both safer and cheaper alternative to either a.) signing Mike Vick or b.) drafting a QB this year.

Whitner on the other hand is a mediocre saftey that could be replaced tomorrow by about 45 guys.

Plus if the Skins are rid of Campbell then you know they are taking a QB in the first round, which means one more OT to slip down to 9.

This really would be a no brainer as far as I’m concerned.

by FrankL on Feb 25, 2010 2:56 PM EST reply actions  

I’m not so sure Sam Bradford is a good fit as a Redskin. At least while they’re still calling themselves Redskins.

Buffalo Rumblings Premiere League 2009 Champion

by TheAfghanTwilight on Feb 25, 2010 4:02 PM EST up reply actions  

Not that you mentioned Bradford, but he’s been linked to them.

Buffalo Rumblings Premiere League 2009 Champion

by TheAfghanTwilight on Feb 25, 2010 4:06 PM EST up reply actions  

haha

did not think of that

"Hold ya chin up...nuh nuh nuh...gone" -Marshawn Lynch-

by billsoferie on Feb 25, 2010 4:14 PM EST up reply actions  

Stats

Campbell 2009 Bills Total 2009
Cmp 327 256
Att 507 441
Cmp% 64.5 58
Yds 3618 2789
TD 20 17
Int 15 19
Y/A 7.1 6.3
Rate 86.4 71.7

Easy yes for me. And he played in 16 games last year.

by Squirmin' Thurman on Feb 25, 2010 2:58 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

I just froze for a second…after coming to the realization that combined, the QBs for Buffalo didn’t throw for 3000 yards.

Buffalo Rumblings Premiere League 2009 Champion

by TheAfghanTwilight on Feb 25, 2010 4:01 PM EST up reply actions  

It’s embarrassing, but in the end, AVP was running the show and it was his first go at it.

Buffalo Rumblings Premiere League 2009 Champion

by TheAfghanTwilight on Feb 25, 2010 4:06 PM EST up reply actions  

And at their average of 174 yards per game, they wouldn’t have gotten there with a 17th game either.

I signed up for Second Life about a year ago. Back then my life was so great that I literally wanted a second one. In my Second Life I was also a paper salesman and I was also named Dwight. Absolutely everything was the same. Except I could fly. - Dwight Schrute

by kaisertown on Feb 25, 2010 4:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Stop, please. I’d rather not get sick at work.

Buffalo Rumblings Premiere League 2009 Champion

by TheAfghanTwilight on Feb 25, 2010 4:15 PM EST up reply actions  

I didn’t realize Campbell’s stats were so good…

by MattRichWarren on Feb 25, 2010 4:31 PM EST up reply actions  

i think a lot of people dont realize that still

he had a good year for Washington.

"you just have to know there's always going to be adversity. None of these games are going to be easy. Nothing will be given to us" - Paul Posluszny

by poz on Feb 25, 2010 4:32 PM EST up reply actions  

Maybe

And Maybe Campbell’s stats are good because there was a lot of garbage time playing on a 4-12 team.

by Moose68 on Feb 25, 2010 4:33 PM EST up reply actions  

Why the hell wouldn’t Ryan Fitzpatrick have had good garbage time stats then?

Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott

by Brian Galliford on Feb 25, 2010 4:34 PM EST up reply actions  

An excellent counter argument

I was born in Buffalo, and NO, it's not a suburb of New York City

by Ghetts on Feb 25, 2010 5:28 PM EST up reply actions  

abject lack of talent?

and the perfect answer to those who think Fitz should or could be the starter.

"huge, big, fast, nasty...all those terms"

by fansince60 on Feb 25, 2010 5:34 PM EST up reply actions  

Well, Campbell was protected by Mike Frigging Williams. Talk about “abject lack of talent”!

Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott

by Brian Galliford on Feb 25, 2010 7:57 PM EST up reply actions  

Ummm…. the Bills were pretty much a garbage team, too.

by MattRichWarren on Feb 25, 2010 4:34 PM EST up reply actions  

you would assume that

but in fact the Redskins lost a lot of close games.

by 6 to the Giants
by 2 to the Lions
by 3 to the Panthers
by 8 to the Chiefs
by 10 to the Eagles
by 1 to the Cowboys
by 3 to the Eagles
by 3 to the Saints
by 3 to the Chargers

There were three blowouts. The rest were all close. None of those scores above is a big enough defeat to allow for “Garbage” time.

"you just have to know there's always going to be adversity. None of these games are going to be easy. Nothing will be given to us" - Paul Posluszny

by poz on Feb 25, 2010 4:36 PM EST up reply actions  

Ok I'll play Poz (Garbage time)

by 6 to the Giants (Final score 23-17, G-men run up 17-0 lead, espn says “outcome never in doubt”)

by 4 to the Lions (Final score 19-15. Lions run up 13-0 lead, I’ll say outcome was never in doubt)

by 3 to the Panthers (No garbage time, Panthers comeback in 4th. Campbell a whopping 145 yards. Very little in 4th, 2 bad drives allowed Panthers comeback)

by 8 to the Chiefs (Final score 14-6 Chiefs first win. 6 points, sounds like a Losman lead offense)

by 10 to the Eagles (Eagles ran out to 17-0 lead, hmmm this sounds familiar)

by 1 to the Cowboys (final score 7-6, again 6 points.)

by 3 to the Eagles (I’ll give you this one, but two int’s by Campbell helped Eagles ice the game)

by 3 to the Saints (I’ll give you this one too, but I’d like to add the at this point the Saints took their foot off the pedal a little bit)

by 3 to the Chargers (the whole game was garbage time, Rivers and LT pulled in first half)

You missed the second game against G-men 45-12 (24-0 at half), second game against Cowboys 17-0 (14-0 at half) and Falcons 31-17 (24-3 at half.)

There’s a whole lot of garbage time going here.

by Moose68 on Feb 25, 2010 8:30 PM EST up reply actions  

All those “outcomes never in doubt” that you mention after their opponents put up points were decided by just a few point at the end of it. More importantly, all within one touchdown. Those outcomes were very much in doubt the the end of the game.

The more I see, the les I know.

by CanadianBillsFan on Feb 25, 2010 8:40 PM EST up reply actions  

It also indicates that Campbell has the ability to come back in a game. Sure they lost, but most of those games they could have actually won if they just switched to the air attack earlier. The ’Skins biggest mistake this year was sticking with the ground and pound attack for way to long and only switching to the air attack when they were desperate. Had they used the air attack earlier in those games they would have had a much better record.

The more I see, the les I know.

by CanadianBillsFan on Feb 25, 2010 8:41 PM EST up reply actions  

Most of those do not qualify much as garbage time to me.

First, I did not miss any games as you said at the end. Re-read the last line of my post – I acknowledge the three blowouts there which refer to the three games you pointedly noted in the end.

Second, you use the close games in which the score was low to point out that the Campbell led Redskins did not put up a lot of points. This however, was not the argument you were making or the point I was countering. You said Campbell played in a lot of garbage time to amass his stats. Games that are 7-6 or 14-6 final scores may not be impressive point total outings but that has nothing to do with your point that he was able to wing it in garbage time. In the 7-6 Cowboys game and 14-6 Chiefs game Jason Campbell was fighting a close game until the very end and thus was not wildly throwing the ball as one would in garbage time so I would like to strike those two from the garbage game list.

Third, I’d like remove the Chargers game from the garbage time list as well. Just because Rivers and LT were pulled in the first half doesn’t mean the game wasn’t close and meaningful to Jason Campbell and the Redskins – who at that point in the season wanted any wins they could muster. This game meant a lot to them and they played it like any other game. How the Chargers viewed it is irrelevant.

Fourth, let’s strike off the first Giants game as well. You say that ESPN says the game was never in doubt but I watched the game and totally disagree. I believe that game was the first Sunday of the season and the Bills were playing Monday night. I live with a Steelers fan and Giants fan and that first weekend we celebrated by watching the Steelers on Thursday night (or was it Friday or Saturday), the Giants on Sunday and the Bills on Monday together. The Giants played a close game and yes they jumped out to an early lead but tough defense and big plays by the offense brought the game close and the outcome was very much in doubt to the Giants fans sitting around me and everyone else in the room. We all know how ESPN likes to exaggerate. That game was outcome in doubt until the end. So lets strike that one off.

Fifth, the Lions game was definitely in doubt I’m not sure why you saying it wasn’t. Wow, the DETRIOT LIONS jump out to a two possession lead. Dear lord no! The game must be over! Outcome sealed, game over. Come on man, its the Lions, if the Bills were playing the Pats down 13-0 the game isnt in doubt so scratch that one off too.

Finally, you grant me the Panthers, Eagles and Saints games so strike those three of as well.

That leaves you the Eagles 17-0 lead game as a garbage time game along with the three blowouts.

"you just have to know there's always going to be adversity. None of these games are going to be easy. Nothing will be given to us" - Paul Posluszny

by poz on Feb 25, 2010 8:45 PM EST up reply actions  

me vs poz

1 ok I’ll give you number 1, but wasn’t that one against Campbell
2 my game, my rules. I’d to keep those in there to show off Campbell’s Losmanlike efficiency.
3 garbage time to me is when the other team goes into prevent defense, or takes out first stringers. (I’ll take this one.)
4 no offense, I’m going with espn on this one, but I’ll call it even.
5 it’s the Lions. Should they even have lost to a team that went blank the previous season?

Look if you think Campbell will lead us to playoffs I just have respectfully disagree. But I did enjoy the debate.

by Moose68 on Feb 25, 2010 9:52 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

point 1,2, and 5 all are not in relation to whether Campbell was playing in garbage time but to something else and point 3 and 4 are inconclusive in that they are debatable or a matter of opinion.

I honestly have no idea if Campbell can lead us to the playoffs, I’m still not even sure if I want him here. I’m just defending him from accusations of being a terrible QB as I do not think he is one.

And yes, I too enjoyed the debate Moose!

"you just have to know there's always going to be adversity. None of these games are going to be easy. Nothing will be given to us" - Paul Posluszny

by poz on Feb 26, 2010 1:32 AM EST up reply actions  

Here’s some more stuff to back up your argument.

Campbell finished 20th in the NFL in attempts per game, so he wasn’t exactly slinging it around too much. He finished 16th in yards per game.

Why don’t QBs from other bad teams put up good yardage numbers? Campbell averaged a full yard per pass attempt more than Stafford. He averaged 30 yards per game more than Cassel. Josh Freeman didn’t compile good yardage numbers in TB. The Browns, Bills, Raiders and Rams couldn’t throw on anybody.

in 2008, the eight teams that finished with 5 or fewer wins finished 15th, 20th, 24th, 26th, 29th, 30th, 31st and 32nd in passing yards per game. Only decent QB, David Garrard put up good passing numbers with 5-11 Jacksonville and he did it by throwing the ball the 11th most times per game in the league. Kansas City finished 20th by attempting the 9th most passes in the league.

I signed up for Second Life about a year ago. Back then my life was so great that I literally wanted a second one. In my Second Life I was also a paper salesman and I was also named Dwight. Absolutely everything was the same. Except I could fly. - Dwight Schrute

by kaisertown on Feb 25, 2010 10:02 PM EST up reply actions  

Good point K

Ok that’s a really good stat and a really good point. We all know Campbell had his best season last season. Isn’t he in the league one more season than Edwards? I’m not trying to say that Campbell can’t be a good starter, but no ones trades away a guy who think he might be on the verge of a bigger breakout. IMO I just like Edwards better. I think he’s smarter, has a better delivery and more potential. (Of course that’s just my opinion, I might back off it a little bit more if Bill Walsh didn’t share it before he died.)

by Moose68 on Feb 26, 2010 12:49 AM EST up reply actions  

very good stats by kaiser
in 2008, the eight teams that finished with 5 or fewer wins finished 15th, 20th, 24th, 26th, 29th, 30th, 31st and 32nd in passing yards per game.

Wow, kaiser delivering the TKO with that stat. I think that shows that garbage time doesn’t inflate stats as you might think.

"you just have to know there's always going to be adversity. None of these games are going to be easy. Nothing will be given to us" - Paul Posluszny

by poz on Feb 26, 2010 1:34 AM EST up reply actions  

Stats!!!!

Because they had not running game to speak of.

"If winning isn't everything, why do they keep score?"
~Vince Lombardi~

by Hambone on Feb 25, 2010 7:52 PM EST up reply actions  

having no running game

would lead you to believe opposing teams were defending against the pass against Campbell – making his 33 TDs to 21 INT ratio the last two years that much more impressive.

"you just have to know there's always going to be adversity. None of these games are going to be easy. Nothing will be given to us" - Paul Posluszny

by poz on Feb 25, 2010 8:08 PM EST up reply actions  

over his entire career

Campbell has thrown 55 TDs to 38 INTs.

Trent Edwards has thrown 24 TDs to 25 INTs

No one is saying Jason Campbell is a savior but I have to disagree with your vehement declaration that Campbell may not be an improvement over what we have. Trent, Brohm and Fitz had better receivers this year then Campbell, a better running game, and basically equally terrible offensive lines and Jason Campbell put up better numbers in every stat line:

Fitz/Edwards/Brohm: 2,737 yards, 15 TDs, 19 INTs
Jason Campbell: 3,618 yards, 20 TDs, 15 INTs

Those stats should show you how badly Buffalo needs to either draft Bradford or Clausen or make a move for a guy like Campbell to upgrade.

Oh and the fact that Campbell toughed out 16 games behind an o-line slightly worse than our terrible one while we had to cycle through 3 guys due to various injuries is another bonus in his favor.

"you just have to know there's always going to be adversity. None of these games are going to be easy. Nothing will be given to us" - Paul Posluszny

by poz on Feb 25, 2010 8:16 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

The Bills QB's suck....We know that....

But Campbell isnt even an upgrade. Whether or not our QB’s were bad, look at who was calling plays? A VERY inexperienced AVP. Either way….I say if you like a QB in the draft to lead this team into the future, you dont waste your time trading for a stop gap, average, NO LEADERSHIP QB in Campbell. He isn’t a smart QB. Bottom line.

"If winning isn't everything, why do they keep score?"
~Vince Lombardi~

by Hambone on Feb 25, 2010 8:41 PM EST up reply actions  

REC'D!

Campbell is a good QB.

The more I see, the les I know.

by CanadianBillsFan on Feb 25, 2010 8:43 PM EST up reply actions  

Oh and Poz, how about that hockey game?

Gold for Canada! usa? silver

The more I see, the les I know.

by CanadianBillsFan on Feb 25, 2010 8:44 PM EST up reply actions  

your ladies earned it

I never doubted the capabilities of Canadian women!

 You Canadian men on the other hand….. :)

By the way, I still can’t believe we’re playing Slovakia and Finland in the final four. Somewhere I have a bad feeling about facing underdogs that have made it this far……

"you just have to know there's always going to be adversity. None of these games are going to be easy. Nothing will be given to us" - Paul Posluszny

by poz on Feb 25, 2010 8:48 PM EST up reply actions  

You and me both brother. I’m actually a little scared of Slovakia. Finland on the other hand aren’t surprising at all. Remember they did win Silver in Torino and they have a heck of a team.

The more I see, the les I know.

by CanadianBillsFan on Feb 25, 2010 8:52 PM EST up reply actions  

very true

they also play sound hockey in every game you watch them in. Those Slovaks can put it in the net if you give them an opening. Though the way your playing right now, they shouldn’t see too many openings.

"you just have to know there's always going to be adversity. None of these games are going to be easy. Nothing will be given to us" - Paul Posluszny

by poz on Feb 25, 2010 8:54 PM EST up reply actions  

We really only need to worry about the Hossa-Gaborik line, if we stop them, the we have it set. Your D should hammer them quite nicely. And the fact that we also have a better goalie than the Swedes is also a plus.

The more I see, the les I know.

by CanadianBillsFan on Feb 25, 2010 8:57 PM EST up reply actions  

it seems that

butterfly technique goalkeeping is the name of the game in international play huh?

"you just have to know there's always going to be adversity. None of these games are going to be easy. Nothing will be given to us" - Paul Posluszny

by poz on Feb 25, 2010 9:04 PM EST up reply actions  

I think it’s because it’s the most used style of goaltending. But not all butterfly goalies are that good. If you depend only on the’fly technique then your screwed, you have to have extremely good hands and the ability to move around/get back up very quickly to make it work.

The more I see, the les I know.

by CanadianBillsFan on Feb 25, 2010 9:07 PM EST up reply actions  

Campbell vs Edwards

Ok I’ll give you that Campbell has been an hamstrung by having a new OC every year of his professional career, I’ll give you that he hasn’t had much an OL to speak of either. But he has had running game. In 2007 and 2008 Portis ran for 1,200 and 1,400 yards respectively. (Portis was hurt in 2009.)

I’ll give you that we haven’t seen the best that Campbell could be. My point is that you can say the same thing about Edwards. Why trade for a guys with an upside, if you already have one? (We need are all of our picks.) What both QB’s need is a good OL, and def so they can do what they do.

IMO we should throw out the 2009 by Edwards season because a limited experience QB coach was calling his plays.

by Moose68 on Feb 25, 2010 8:47 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Exactly!!!!!

Well put Moose. I’m so frustrated by this board tonight. All this crap of let’s go get an average QB at best with no leadership capabilities to speak of blah blah blah. Gets old. Numbers arent everything people. I say, either draft a QB or allow the guys on the current roster the opportunity to play in Chans system AND keep our picks.

"If winning isn't everything, why do they keep score?"
~Vince Lombardi~

by Hambone on Feb 25, 2010 8:52 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

I speak for most bill fans when i say if we go into next season with no change at QB and they suck like they (meaning Trent and Ryan) did this years it would hurt almost too much to watch on Sundays and would likely lead to a 4-12 season or even worse and Chan would be on the chopping block and Nix would lose a lot of his power at ODB

by Circle The Wagon on Feb 25, 2010 11:52 PM EST up reply actions  

You want to know something bad?

I wouldn’t mind going 4-12 or 3-13. I mean the entire year would SUCK. And my alcohol consumption would skyrocket. But we’d also get Mallette or Locker out of it, so in the long run I’d be at peace with it.

The more I see, the les I know.

by CanadianBillsFan on Feb 26, 2010 12:41 AM EST up reply actions  

Average QB vs Average QB

I could be wrong on Edwards and Poz could be wrong about Campbell. We could both be wrong. If you don’t surround the guy with the right system and talent any QB could have a bad year. I think we heard a lot of frustration tonight about the direction the Bills are going and if it is the right one after being down for so long.

I just don’t see how improving our OL (drafting a LT at 9) and having Gailey calling the plays wouldn’t immediately make any QB better than last season.

by Moose68 on Feb 26, 2010 1:11 AM EST up reply actions  

the biggest issue for me

with giving Edwards the reigns back and not at least picking up a guy like Campbell if your not going to draft a QB is that Edwards lost the trust of his teammates in the locker room and on the field. The team wanted Ryan Fitzpatrick. Lee Evans is a class guy but his body language spoke volumes about how happy he was the first interview after the Edwards benching was announced. Once you lose trust in a QB the team more often than not can not rediscover it. Edwards lost the team and thats a near unfixable problem for a QB and a team.

"you just have to know there's always going to be adversity. None of these games are going to be easy. Nothing will be given to us" - Paul Posluszny

by poz on Feb 26, 2010 1:39 AM EST up reply actions  

THANK YOU.

edwards is afraid on the field you can see it in his eyes at the end of every third down failure. Edwards sucks, i gave him the benefit after the first concuss but, after the second one. he isnt the same QB at all. it is torture to watch him on sundays. everyone was crying for bills to make a move at qb, now you get cold feet. i do agree he isnt the best pick but if it is a late round pick we should do it.

by Buffalove83 on Feb 26, 2010 3:17 AM EST up reply actions  

I didn’t realize the Bills’ stats were so BAD!

I knew they were junk, but seeing them makes me… wow.

I call it... The Avaslug!
I am the 1st and probably only official member of the David "Dr." Jones fanclub.

Syracuse Basketball 2010: Making Hoya's cry.

by UZ on Feb 26, 2010 4:22 AM EST up reply actions  

I like Campbell more than:

Edwards
Fitzpatrick
Vick
Pennington

…I don’t really like Campbell overall though. If Buffalo was adding him to be a stopgap QB for 2010 while they groom a real answer that would be one thing, but I doubt Wilson would put this kind of money into a stopgap. Jason Campbell? Scary.

Just say no...to Trent Edwards at QB.

by Port Royal on Feb 25, 2010 3:09 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

I just rec’d every comment that didn’t want Campbell – that’s how I feel about him as a QB in Buffalo

Hello - thanks for reading my signature. It's very interesting. Bye

by J2 on Feb 25, 2010 3:12 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

:-)

rec warfare!

a.k.a. Undee

by Undee on Feb 25, 2010 3:39 PM EST up reply actions  

Boooooo

I’d rather just have their 3rd rounder… but I’m curious if Whitner can elevate his game in the new scheme… if we trade him we’ll never know

"I don't agree with a damn thing you say, but I would die for your right to say it."

"If I had to do it all over again, I'd do it all over again."

by ForeignArrow on Feb 25, 2010 3:15 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

Whitner wont get us a third rounder.

The more I see, the les I know.

by CanadianBillsFan on Feb 25, 2010 4:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Campbell

Just one question, if Campbell so good why is washington talking about trading him?

by buffalobacker on Feb 25, 2010 3:23 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

thay want Clausen/Bradford

"Tigers love pepper... they hate cinnamon"- The Hangover

by atlantalove on Feb 25, 2010 3:28 PM EST up reply actions  

haha – ATL Love – didn’t you write a big post about Campbell a month ago???

by PDel22 on Feb 25, 2010 3:29 PM EST up reply actions  

Why does Washington do anything...

Like sign Bruce Smith for a billion dollars?
Or try and trade Campbell last year to get Sanchez?
Or sign Haynesworth for a billion dollars?
Or sign half the morons they sign?

Seriously, if there are two front offices worse than Buffalo’s in the last 10 years, one of them is Oakaland and the other is in the Nation’s Capitol. For the Skins, its a culture of making a splash and doing something daring-they would trade a steady, consistent player for a chance at something better every chance they can get.

Because they are nuts.

by FrankL on Feb 25, 2010 3:36 PM EST up reply actions  

…and yet they made the playoffs in both 05 and 07…I don’t think you can compare their problems to Buffalo’s.

Just say no...to Trent Edwards at QB.

by Port Royal on Feb 25, 2010 5:21 PM EST up reply actions  

Uh sure you can?

The NFC has been notoriously weak over the last 6 or 7 years. Top heavy with one or two teams, and then a bunch of dogs. If the Bills had been playing in the NFC in their last year with Mularky, they would have made the playoffs. Easily.

by FrankL on Feb 25, 2010 6:51 PM EST up reply actions  

Please

The NFC East is year in and year out as competitive as any division. ‘04 was a shame since Buffalo was better than NFC playoff teams like St. Louis, Seattle, and Minnesota, but ultimately, the Bills blew their chance in the finale and nobody cries for a 9-7 team that misses the playoffs…Bills’ fans can legitimately cut up one team right now and that’s the Lions. We have no right to mock the Redskins.

Just say no...to Trent Edwards at QB.

by Port Royal on Feb 25, 2010 8:03 PM EST up reply actions  

What?

Nothing to do with being competitive in the division-the wild card is a conference competition. The NFC Wild Card teams have been dogs, and Washington has never even come close to competing for an NFC East title in the last ten years.

(Not that, other than a Giants team) has the NFC East produced much in the way of fearsome playoff competitors. Dallas has had a better record than Washington, but only just won a playoff game for the first time in more than 12 years. The reason the Eagles kept making the NFC Championship game was because the rest of the East was so weak the just ate it up every year. None of which is really to the point-as again, for the WIld Card you are competing against the whole division.

No one is crying for the 9-7 Bills, but its pretty clear that sub par NFC teams have made the playoffs in years where good AFC teams (not necessarily the Bills) have been left out.

And I don’t think we’ve beat the Lions in the last 3 tries either, so I wouldn’t go there.

I think the two Redskins playoff teams were complete flukes, and they have nothing of any consequence to show for it.

by FrankL on Feb 25, 2010 9:17 PM EST up reply actions  

Honestly I couldn’t tell you but it seems to me like they have had him looking over his shoulder scene his rookie year but he has held down the job and they haven’t been able to find a reason to take it from him. To me that shows mental toughness. Now bring him to buffalo where he would be clear starter and Chan plays to his strenghts we should get the best out of Jason Campbell

by Circle The Wagon on Feb 25, 2010 3:48 PM EST up reply actions  

I guess if the Raiders released Asomugha we shouldn’t get him either. Must be something wrong with the guy!

I call it... The Avaslug!
I am the 1st and probably only official member of the David "Dr." Jones fanclub.

Syracuse Basketball 2010: Making Hoya's cry.

by UZ on Feb 26, 2010 4:23 AM EST up reply actions  

You guys are cheating on us?

by JimmyK on Feb 25, 2010 3:27 PM EST reply actions  

It's ok

All the Bills ever do is flirt!

~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."

by Kurupt on Feb 25, 2010 3:35 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

haha, well played.

I signed up for Second Life about a year ago. Back then my life was so great that I literally wanted a second one. In my Second Life I was also a paper salesman and I was also named Dwight. Absolutely everything was the same. Except I could fly. - Dwight Schrute

by kaisertown on Feb 25, 2010 4:10 PM EST up reply actions  

At this point the playoffs are like the Bills’ catholic girlfriend, and we’ve been trying to get to 1st base for 10 years.

I call it... The Avaslug!
I am the 1st and probably only official member of the David "Dr." Jones fanclub.

Syracuse Basketball 2010: Making Hoya's cry.

by UZ on Feb 26, 2010 4:24 AM EST up reply actions  

They would owe us a draft pic. Campbell is a back up at best, and I want no part of him as our QB

Keepin' the faith!

by nickdaniels on Feb 25, 2010 3:48 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

So he’s a backup that has started 45 straight games for the Redskins all 16 in 2009 and 2008, and the last 13 games of 2007), and put up 9563 yards in thsoe 3 seasons (3618 in 2009, 3245 in 2008 and 2700 in 2007). He’s also gotten better every year. Yeah thats a hell of a backup.

The more I see, the les I know.

by CanadianBillsFan on Feb 25, 2010 4:53 PM EST up reply actions  

So that begs the question: Why in the world is Washington so ready to give up on him

and be left with Todd Freakin Collins as the only QB who is even somewhat capable on their roster?

by StroudFanClub on Feb 25, 2010 4:57 PM EST up reply actions  

because Shanny

wants to rebuild there with his own guy – Bradford.

"you just have to know there's always going to be adversity. None of these games are going to be easy. Nothing will be given to us" - Paul Posluszny

by poz on Feb 25, 2010 4:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Shanahan is a new coach, probably wants to bring in his own QB. Dan Snyder has grown tired of Campbell. Dan Snyder is almost as big of an idiot as Al Davis. They see the oppertunity to get Sam Bradford AND improve their D. The list goes on man.

The more I see, the les I know.

by CanadianBillsFan on Feb 25, 2010 4:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes because this question hasn't been answered 50 times already

I call it... The Avaslug!
I am the 1st and probably only official member of the David "Dr." Jones fanclub.

Syracuse Basketball 2010: Making Hoya's cry.

by UZ on Feb 26, 2010 4:25 AM EST up reply actions  

An Upgrade???

Not so sure/but of course….. I see experience which is a plus but i see more of the same. A lot of check downs and a guy that only sees about half of the field.

Although, with the ball control offense we are trying to deploy…. He has been good at throwing the 5 yard dump pass and handing the ball off to Portis….

by MikeEverett08 on Feb 25, 2010 3:51 PM EST reply actions  

i like him but only if that pick is a 6th or 7th

Who would we get rid of ?

"Hold ya chin up...nuh nuh nuh...gone" -Marshawn Lynch-

by billsoferie on Feb 25, 2010 4:05 PM EST reply actions  

Before the draft?

The Bills would be morons to do this before the draft, because who’s to say Bradford or whomever they have rated as the top Qb isn’t going to fall to them at 9. Why not wait till after the draft then evaluate your roster?
For the record I think we should get a left tackle this year and wait until next year to get our Qb of the future.

by bub832 on Feb 25, 2010 4:08 PM EST reply actions  

and that QB should be Locker

"Hold ya chin up...nuh nuh nuh...gone" -Marshawn Lynch-

by billsoferie on Feb 25, 2010 4:15 PM EST up reply actions  

yeah

like Locker better we will see this year

"Hold ya chin up...nuh nuh nuh...gone" -Marshawn Lynch-

by billsoferie on Feb 25, 2010 8:26 PM EST up reply actions  

It all depends on what the draft pick is.

If it’s a 4th or lower, sign me up, that addresses the QB position, leaving us to rebuild our line and defense.

Mmmph rrgh prrmf! - someone with his mouth gagged
Go Jazz! Go Hogs! GO BILLS!

by Dyl on Feb 25, 2010 4:14 PM EST reply actions  

I would send Whitner and a 7th rounder for Campbell in a heart beat

Campbell improved mightly last season despite playing behind the one line that was worse than ours, having no running backs (Rock Cartwright, ew!), and having absolutely no receivers. Plus his coach was Jim Zorn! Campbell had a worse situation than the Bills!

Lets not underestimate the importance of having a guy behind center in Buffalo who has survived 16 games behind a porous o-line already. He didn’t fold and turn into the scaredy cat that Trent Edwards became. On the contrary, Campbell improved his completion percentage, touchdowns, yards per completion, and yards. He also has a cannon which will be a plus in Buffalo. You throw in the fact that he played the Dallas Cowboys twice a year for three years and he has familiarity with a good 3-4 which is a major plus in the AFC East.

My only concern and its a major one, is that Campbell seems to have a fumbling problem and after JP Losman caused me to tear out chunks of hair I’d rather not relieve cheering for a QB who drops the rock (come to think of it, Drew Bledsoe dropped the ball a lot too).

I would welcome this move because it would satisfy me enough in terms of a nice mix of youth (28) and experience (4 years starting) to join the chorus of fans willing to wait until 2011 to get our quarterback or to nab Tebow in the 3rd round this year.

If we bring in Campbell, LT becomes my position of choice at 9 to protect him and give Lee time to get deep where Campbell can hit him.

"you just have to know there's always going to be adversity. None of these games are going to be easy. Nothing will be given to us" - Paul Posluszny

by poz on Feb 25, 2010 4:19 PM EST reply actions   2 recs

What a wonderful smell you discovered your highness.

1-Statistically Campbell is a better QB then Edwards, I’ll give you that.

However, his best season was 2009 when Washington went 4-12, so I’m thinking there’s a lot of garbage yards in there. Remove this year and he’s never throw for more than 13 TD’s in a season. Sounds a lot like a guy we already have.

2-NFL.com says Campbell has 34 career fumbles with 12 lost.

Can someone check this? That’s the reason why Shanahan wants to get rid of him. (Trust me Wash is drafting Bradford, they just want to get something for Campbell if they can.) You can’t win with a QB whose hands are more slippery like a Vancouver Ice rink. (Low blow I know. I take ’em when I can.)

3-If they were giving us a higher draft pick that might make sense. This story came from Washington, so I’m guessing that the Bills were the only team that didn’t hang up immediately when Shan called and said he was interested in traded Campbell to them.

by Moose68 on Feb 25, 2010 4:21 PM EST reply actions  

Campbell lost 8 fumlbes in his 2nd NFL season. He’s only lost four fumbles over the last two years which is actually better than average. Aaron Rodgers, Tony Romo, Kurt Warner, Drew Brees and Eli Manning all lost 4 or more this past season and other guys like Roethlisberger, Cassel, Rivers and McNabb lost 3 this year which is the same number that Campbell has averaged over his career, even with those 8 fumbles one season. Those four lost fumbles over the last two years also occured behind one of the worst OLs in the league and Campbell has gotten hit with the ball in his hands as often as almost any QB in the league. The fumbles are a non-issue.

I signed up for Second Life about a year ago. Back then my life was so great that I literally wanted a second one. In my Second Life I was also a paper salesman and I was also named Dwight. Absolutely everything was the same. Except I could fly. - Dwight Schrute

by kaisertown on Feb 25, 2010 8:30 PM EST up reply actions  

W/L Record

Trent got no breaks in condemnation for not over coming offensive weaknesses. Why is everybody giving Campbell the benefit of doubt. We have a Campbell already and his name is Trent. Why do we want someone elses garbage, we truly have are own. Hope Bil’s play it smart and wait till next year to get the final piece.

by buffalobacker on Feb 25, 2010 8:42 PM EST up reply actions  

Dude

We don’t give Trent any breaks,because well quite frankly he breaks. And he’s never had a season statistically succesful as Campbell. At this point Edwards isn’t fit to carry Campbell’s jock honestly.

by mob16151 on Feb 25, 2010 8:55 PM EST up reply actions  

I’m not giving Campbell the benefit of the doubt. Those fumble numbers are raw stats. Read into them any way that you want to.

In similiar situations, Campbell is the superior QB to Edwards statistically and it’s not that close. Edwards played terribly in a terrible situation last year while Campbell played mediocre in an equally terrible situation. Given what the Bills are probably going to be putting out on the field next year, I think it’s clear that Campbell would be a considerably better 1-2 year option while Buffalo drafts a QB. Campbell is far less likely to get injured than Edwards and he’s far less likely to go into a total shell where the team gives up on him. Buffalo can’t afford to take the chance that Edwards plays like he did last year. Campbell has proven that while he’s not that good of a QB, he’ll hang in there and give you a decent season regardless of the circumstances.

I signed up for Second Life about a year ago. Back then my life was so great that I literally wanted a second one. In my Second Life I was also a paper salesman and I was also named Dwight. Absolutely everything was the same. Except I could fly. - Dwight Schrute

by kaisertown on Feb 25, 2010 9:13 PM EST up reply actions  

Really

It just sounds to good to be true. A little hestitant, gun shy, Damn pretty soon Ill be checking down !

by buffalobacker on Feb 25, 2010 9:28 PM EST up reply actions  

If he’s a restricted free agent this year doesn’t that mean he’s an unrestricted free agent next year? If he is and does horrible this year, which he will behind our o-line then your going to let him walk and you traded whitner and a draft pick for nothing. Why trade for someone the skins are gonna cut anyway.

by bub832 on Feb 25, 2010 4:26 PM EST reply actions  

He would be a UFA after his sixth year. He needs two more seasons.

by MattRichWarren on Feb 25, 2010 4:34 PM EST up reply actions  

Also, Whitner only has one year left on his contract anyways. And I think it would be great if the Bills were to sign him for 2 yrs, Campbell is a good stop-gap if nothing else, and if anything else his a competent enough QB to win you some games. If after the 2010 season he hasn’t made Chan giggle then the Bills can draft one in the next draft and Campbell can either keep the spot warm or hit the road – I would like this, and if Washington is going to draft a QB then they get Whitner for the one they no longer want… everyone is happy

I was born in Buffalo, and NO, it's not a suburb of New York City

by Ghetts on Feb 25, 2010 5:34 PM EST up reply actions  

I'm leaning towards "UGH" on this, but just to make sure:

Can someone give me a similar situation that: A team is willingly trading away their only “starting caliber” QB on the roster, who is under age 28?

Someone please give me a situation in which the QB ended up turning his career around….

PS: Schaub doesn’t count since he was the backup to Vick and wasn’t playing as long as Vick was there.

by StroudFanClub on Feb 25, 2010 4:41 PM EST reply actions  

Does it have to be trade? How about “let walk via free agency”? Because a certain Super Bowl XLIV MVP rings a bell.

And no, I’m not making a comparison. You asked the question. :)

Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott

by Brian Galliford on Feb 25, 2010 4:43 PM EST up reply actions  

Haha, nice try

Yes, it has to be a trade. Plus, he was not the only “starting caliber” QB on that roster….and that’s why he was let go so easily….plus, he had the injury. All these are circumstances that are different than this situation.

Matt Hasselbeck maybe? Brett Favre?

But to be fair, neither of those guys played for much for their original teams…..so I don’t think they were “given up on” by those teams, really….

by StroudFanClub on Feb 25, 2010 4:49 PM EST up reply actions  

Well, if the Skins are about to draft Bradford, they would have two “starting caliber” QBs…..just sayin’

by bluecollarbuffalo on Feb 25, 2010 5:03 PM EST up reply actions  

Trent Green?

"you just have to know there's always going to be adversity. None of these games are going to be easy. Nothing will be given to us" - Paul Posluszny

by poz on Feb 25, 2010 4:45 PM EST up reply actions  

Hmm, Trent Green kinda works for me

Had some time to play in St Louis, but was traded to Kansas City.

But again, they probably traded him because they saw what they had in Kurt Warner.

Washington is literally saying, “yes, as of today we have 1 starting caliber QB, and we STILL want to trade him to you….” Doesn’t that seem odd? I mean, I take it they plan on replacing him with Bradford? But what if he is picked before their pick?

by StroudFanClub on Feb 25, 2010 4:55 PM EST up reply actions  

they know that there is no way

Clausen and Bradford are gone when they pick. The Rams may take a QB but other than that Detroit already has Stafford and the Bucs took a guy in the first last year in Freeman. They are doing essentially what the Rams did with Trent Green.

"you just have to know there's always going to be adversity. None of these games are going to be easy. Nothing will be given to us" - Paul Posluszny

by poz on Feb 25, 2010 4:58 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree

Doesn’t seem believable, his stats are better than our previous QB. Seems to good to be true, what pick are they wanting besides whitner? Wasn’t there a legitimate question on his “football smarts” ? Seem to remember something about consistency…

by buffalobacker on Feb 25, 2010 8:15 PM EST up reply actions  

Cutler Trade

Denver’s trade of Cutler for Orton is the only one that comes to my mind. I wouldn’t call that working out. I’m pretty sure Warner was a free agent when he went to Giants and then Arizona.

It took 4 years for Brees to work out in NO. I’m not sure that Chix has that much time to turn things around.

by Moose68 on Feb 25, 2010 5:59 PM EST up reply actions  

If the Bills and their fans have a “WIN IMMEDIATELY” mentality, it will make things even worse.

I call it... The Avaslug!
I am the 1st and probably only official member of the David "Dr." Jones fanclub.

Syracuse Basketball 2010: Making Hoya's cry.

by UZ on Feb 26, 2010 4:28 AM EST up reply actions  

I don't know that I have a Win Immediatly mentality asa Bill's fan right now

But I do have a show some immediate improvement right away mentality.

by mob16151 on Feb 26, 2010 5:17 AM EST up reply actions  

Kurt Warner comes to mind – change of scenery and different offensive philosophy worked out OK for him.

by PDel22 on Feb 25, 2010 4:44 PM EST reply actions  

Nah, the first NFL team to get him (St. Louis), he won superbowls with.

Well, to be fair, he was on Green Bay’s practice squad for a minute before the arena league.

by StroudFanClub on Feb 25, 2010 4:51 PM EST up reply actions  

Maybe there isn’t an answer – However I think “turning around his career” isn’t the best phrase for this situation. I think it’s more of a line like… largely improved from one team to the next. He has improved each year with constant instability with coaches and scheme. He never really regressed as a player in order to have to turn his career around.

by PDel22 on Feb 25, 2010 5:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Which is amazing in his case, being on one of the worst teams in the league in terms of talent around him and having 3 different OC’s.

I call it... The Avaslug!
I am the 1st and probably only official member of the David "Dr." Jones fanclub.

Syracuse Basketball 2010: Making Hoya's cry.

by UZ on Feb 26, 2010 4:29 AM EST up reply actions  

well this

was part I of my off-season plan. I don’t see how Jason Campbell is a bad idea. I’ll have to dig out my notes and post it up here soon. But his numbers last season were quite good considering the circumstances and playing behind a Buffalo like OL. He was up in the top 15 QB’s in yards per completion for sure. I’d love to see Campbell in Buffalo

MARVelous - "I went from America's team to North America's Team" Terrell Owens

by MARVelous on Feb 25, 2010 5:03 PM EST reply actions  

Yes - but only if the pick is low or conditional

It’s a great trade if the pick is low – 4th or lower, conditional ’11 would be even better depending on how many games he actually starts for Buffalo in ’10.

Dramatically improves the QB competition. Doesn’t hurt your defense all that much – although you do lose a leader. But a leader who didn’t make plays…

by kgun201 on Feb 25, 2010 5:33 PM EST reply actions  

But a leader who didn’t make plays

Hence, not a leader by example!

"huge, big, fast, nasty...all those terms"

by fansince60 on Feb 25, 2010 5:36 PM EST up reply actions  

Wilson is more of a leader then Whitner, hands down.

I was born in Buffalo, and NO, it's not a suburb of New York City

by Ghetts on Feb 25, 2010 5:36 PM EST up reply actions  

Not Elite?

He’ll be better than any of the rookie QB’s if Buffalo were to draft them. Perhaps they will out-perform him on other teams that are further along than Buffalo is offensively, but I don’t think any of the rookies would come in and make Buffalo competitve in a way like Ryan did for Atlanta.

So that’s all he has to do this season, and then you take it from there. It’s not much of a loss, so the whole “he’ll never be great” contingent are kinda missing the point.

by kgun201 on Feb 25, 2010 5:35 PM EST reply actions  

Atlanta had a great off season

They were smart and got Micheal Turner, then drafted good with Matty and Sam Baker (RT).

New decade, New GM, New Coach, Jimmy Clausen? Could the ineptitude end?
The Official Draft Jimmy Clausen Bandwagon.

by SouthBuffaloNDgrad on Feb 25, 2010 5:52 PM EST up reply actions  

One of the main reasons why I like this would be the simple fact that the Bills would almost 100% be guranteed to HAVE to pick a LT (which hopefully will be Buluga).
I know a lot of people complain about Campbell’s fumbles, but if you watch the games he played his line was damn near invisible and he had a horrid run game to slow down the pass rush as well…

I was born in Buffalo, and NO, it's not a suburb of New York City

by Ghetts on Feb 25, 2010 5:39 PM EST reply actions  

Yuck, not big on Davis at all… Buluga I think has the best work ethic and is the most mature of all the OT in the draft, also I think he will be the most consistent not only in his rookie season, but in the future, and that’s not to say he won’t be able to dominate in games either

I was born in Buffalo, and NO, it's not a suburb of New York City

by Ghetts on Feb 25, 2010 6:13 PM EST up reply actions  

You don't take guys who aren't elite athletes in the top 10

Davis’ ceiling is much higher, so it’s ok to do so with him. Bulaga is limited athletically – so I wouldn’t do it.

by kgun201 on Feb 25, 2010 6:21 PM EST up reply actions  

Ever hear of this guy named “Mike Williams?” That’s what the whole Davis thing reminds me of.

I call it... The Avaslug!
I am the 1st and probably only official member of the David "Dr." Jones fanclub.

Syracuse Basketball 2010: Making Hoya's cry.

by UZ on Feb 26, 2010 4:30 AM EST up reply actions  

Not even close

Yeah, I’ve heard of him, and it’s not even close.

by kgun201 on Feb 26, 2010 2:33 PM EST up reply actions  

Hardly

I don’t think it mans they would take a LT at all. In fact, who says they wouln’t be more inclined to take Berry with Whitner gone. Someone said earlier The Bills are “stacked” at safety… I don’t think so. Wilson and Scott aren’t elite safeties, I’m sorry. This move doesn’t make much sense to me because the Bills have A LOT of needs. Trading away your starting safety and a pick for a questionable Qb is not progress. Don’t give away any draft picks!

Hey, careful, man, there's a beverage here! -The Dude

by S2 on Feb 25, 2010 6:21 PM EST up reply actions  

Whitner made very little impact

That’s his whole problem. He’s solid and versatile…. just didn’t make plays. If you get a shot at imroving the QB competition cheaply (and this would count as cheaply in my book) then I think you do it.

by kgun201 on Feb 25, 2010 6:43 PM EST up reply actions  

the Bills would almost 100% be guranteed to HAVE to pick a LT

Where’s eric?

by MattRichWarren on Feb 25, 2010 8:30 PM EST up reply actions  

The brick wall finally got the better of him :-)

If we end up with Vick, T.O., Richie I., and Porter….that is really pushing the dbag density limit for one team.

by Joe P. on Feb 25, 2010 8:54 PM EST up reply actions  

I say pull the trigger (as long as the pick we have to give them isn’t too high).

Whitner is replaceable and we’re deep at safety and QB is a glaring need on this team. I wouldn’t mind throwing a guy like Campbell into the mix and I would see this trade as relatively low risk, with a potentially high reward.

by BuffaloWill on Feb 25, 2010 6:51 PM EST reply actions  

Whitner is replaceable

Not only that, Whitner is basically replaced at this point – or as close to being so as a player can possibly get. George Wilson played much better than him when he was in there as did Bryan Scott. I still think Whitner can keep improving but when two much older vets have outplayed you in the same season you’ve basically lost your job.

"you just have to know there's always going to be adversity. None of these games are going to be easy. Nothing will be given to us" - Paul Posluszny

by poz on Feb 25, 2010 7:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Whitner is really not that good, and if we can ship him out for Campbell and a late round pick I would be happy with this. Campbell has put up decent stats in a bad situation.

I had to un-follow Whitner on Twitter because all of his prima donna tweets were really starting to get on my nerves. Especially the ones where he bragged about getting manicures and pedicures. The dude’s a pretty boy and he’s all talk. Send him off!

by GregFromNJ on Feb 25, 2010 7:54 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Send them Whitner and someone else they could use...

Stroud, Parrish, or Kelsay and ask for a late round draft and Campbell in return.

by NorCal BillsFan on Feb 25, 2010 7:43 PM EST reply actions  

Might vaguely desire Parrish. Stroud might fill time while Haynesworth is taking a breather, but it seems like a waste. Yeah, nobody should want Kelsay. Maybe one of our QBs as insurance? I just don’t know.

Official ledge-talker-offer of the Buffalo Bills.

by WhyBillsWhy on Feb 25, 2010 8:54 PM EST up reply actions  

They're the Skins?

I call it... The Avaslug!
I am the 1st and probably only official member of the David "Dr." Jones fanclub.

Syracuse Basketball 2010: Making Hoya's cry.

by UZ on Feb 26, 2010 4:31 AM EST up reply actions  

why not. Donte Whitner has showed me nothing besides an interception in his first game as a Bill. I believe Campbell can be a SOLID qb if put in the right system

by we r tuff on Feb 25, 2010 8:26 PM EST reply actions  

Right System

O.K. Put Trent in right system and he’d thrive. Point is we already have a Campbell, his name is Trent. Why waste a pick on QB that’s having similuar issues that Trent has?

by buffalobacker on Feb 25, 2010 8:47 PM EST reply actions  

If by put Trent in the right system

You mean put him somewhere he’d never be hit then I agree. If your comparing them talent wise I’m going torespectfully disagree like hell with you. ; )

by mob16151 on Feb 25, 2010 8:57 PM EST up reply actions  

wheres that no button when you need it

trent is better than cambell. no freaking way would i want to trade donte AND a draft pick for camble….come on…

Buffalo, that's where it's at baby. - Adam 'Pacman' Jones

by silverstreak3k on Feb 25, 2010 9:03 PM EST reply actions  

trent is better than cambell.

Based on….?

by MattRichWarren on Feb 26, 2010 11:58 AM EST up reply actions  

Well

If he’s so talented then why washington shopping him around? Talent wise I couldn’t tell you whose the most talented. My point is Campbell isn’t all that. He reminds me of Trent because they both share the same shitty O/L woes etc.. I thought the only thing that matters in the end is does he win ! The answer to that is NO. Can he take a hit sure, can he throw , yes. Has he been effective in W/L column. NO. Don’t waste the pick !!

by buffalobacker on Feb 25, 2010 9:04 PM EST reply actions  

But the QB doesn't have the final say in the W/L record

Heres how I see it. You have a chance to grab a 28 yo QB with upside you do it. Especially one who has managed toput up decent number’s despite all the adversity he’s faced.

by mob16151 on Feb 25, 2010 9:06 PM EST up reply actions  

how does cambell have upside?

hes been in the nfl for 4-5 years now. how much further up can he go?

Buffalo, that's where it's at baby. - Adam 'Pacman' Jones

by silverstreak3k on Feb 25, 2010 9:17 PM EST up reply actions  

Aaron Rodgers has been in the league 4-5 years

and made a huge leap this last season.

Drew Brees made a huge leap in his sixth season

Eli Manning in his fourth season

Kurt Warner in his…well…far along into his career

you get the idea. QBs can flourish late and do so all the time.

Matt Hasselback comes to mind as well.

"you just have to know there's always going to be adversity. None of these games are going to be easy. Nothing will be given to us" - Paul Posluszny

by poz on Feb 25, 2010 9:22 PM EST up reply actions  

eh i guess

i still dont think eli is all that good, he just had a really good year. i think its hard to compare brees, and warner to cambell. but maybe thats just me. rodgers was always thought of as a good prospect, a really good one. its like comparing cambell to kolb. kolb will be a better qb than cambel, and be worth the picks. cambell is about tapped out in my opinion.

Buffalo, that's where it's at baby. - Adam 'Pacman' Jones

by silverstreak3k on Feb 25, 2010 9:33 PM EST up reply actions  

Campbell was a first round pick

so he had to have been considered a good prospect at one point, right?

You could be right that Campbell is tapped out, but he does have talent and Chan Gailey finds ways to maximize his offensive talent.

"you just have to know there's always going to be adversity. None of these games are going to be easy. Nothing will be given to us" - Paul Posluszny

by poz on Feb 25, 2010 9:39 PM EST up reply actions  

Well… yeah, it’s hard to compare them because they succeeded so you instantly think SUPERBOWL CHAMPION when you think Brees.

He wasn’t nearly as hot of a commodity when he was injured with the Chargers.

I call it... The Avaslug!
I am the 1st and probably only official member of the David "Dr." Jones fanclub.

Syracuse Basketball 2010: Making Hoya's cry.

by UZ on Feb 26, 2010 4:39 AM EST up reply actions  

brees last two years in SD

played 31 games, had 51 td passes only 22 ints. roughly 6600 yards, and a 65% completion % Brees avf per completion was 7.2 and 7.9. Brees was obviously on the way and showed great promise.

Campbell

32 games 33 tds, 21 ints 6800 yards and below a 64% completion percentage. avg yards per completion = 7.1 in 2009 and 6.4 in 2008 (how is this guy less of a checkdown master than TE?)

brees was better than campbell, i dont think its a fair comparison.

besides the yardage (which could be attributable to brees playing one game less than campbell) the tds are way down for jason as compared to brees and his completion % was down too. campbell will always be a short dump off player that is a competent at the qb position. he isnt worth a starter in donte AND a draft pick.

Buffalo, that's where it's at baby. - Adam 'Pacman' Jones

by silverstreak3k on Feb 26, 2010 12:54 PM EST up reply actions  

But you miss the point as Brees goes. He was mediocre at best until they drafted Phillip Rivers then they had to decide which to keep. Then Brees has had shoulder injury at the Pro Bowl and the Chargers chose Rivers. The Dolphins wanted Culpepper over Brees they were so worried about his shoulder….

by MattRichWarren on Feb 26, 2010 4:36 PM EST up reply actions  

My thoughts on most of the anti-campbell arguments so far.
Why is Washington shopping him around?

They’re the Skins. They do stupid things. The Broncos traded Cutler for no apparent reason after McNugget came in, new coaches like new QB’s to mold.

He’s no better than Trent!

I find this funny because he basically played in a similar situation to Trent (low talent team with absolutely no O-Line) and played much better than Trent. This isn’t comparing Apples to Oranges here, Campbell hasn’t broken like Trent, he’s gotten better, however slightly, in his time with the Skins. Trent has just gotten worse year by year.

The stats don’t lie. Like it said above, he had more yards, completions etc. than all the Bills QB’s combined last season.

Whitner and a pick? NO NO NO

Why not? Whitner isn’t our best starting option (maybe not even our best 2nd!) at SS anymore. The pick probably won’t be any higher than a 4th. This will basically be drafting an experienced, not all that bad QB with a late pick with Whitner thrown in. I’d much rather have that for my buck than waste a 2nd round pick on a Pike or a Snead when we could use those high picks to get valuable pieces for our new 3-4.

Going from Washington’s line to the Bills line won’t do a damn thing for him.

You have to remember that a huge part of the reason our line was so horrible last season was the injury avalanche we saw throughout the year. The first couple of games… weren’t all that bad! Levitre has another year under his belt now, and we have a possibility for a great G with Incognito. If Wood heals up (I think the frightened thoughts about his injury and how “HE’LL NEVER PLAY AGAIN” are far overblown.) he can be a monster C. If the Bills draft an LT this year, I have no reason to believe that this line is going to be worse than last year or worse than whatever the Skins will put on the field.

The man is a fumble machine!!

It’s hard not to be a fumble machine behind the worst o-line in football. And if we’re talking dumb statistics, he only lost 3 of the 13 last season. :D

I’m not saying he’s our QB of the future, but I am saying that he would certainly be worth what we would be giving up for him.

I call it... The Avaslug!
I am the 1st and probably only official member of the David "Dr." Jones fanclub.

Syracuse Basketball 2010: Making Hoya's cry.

by UZ on Feb 26, 2010 4:47 AM EST reply actions  

And besides
The rumor isn’t actually likely to come to fruition, and the Redskins are indicating publicly that they plan to bring Campbell back. Still, Reid writes that he wouldn’t be surprised if Campbell isn’t back with the Redskins in 2010.

Yeah.

I call it... The Avaslug!
I am the 1st and probably only official member of the David "Dr." Jones fanclub.

Syracuse Basketball 2010: Making Hoya's cry.

by UZ on Feb 26, 2010 4:49 AM EST reply actions  

After

Hearing all arguments for and against, I’m all for it. But like you so aptly stated it’s probably not gonna happen. I kinda figured it was to good to be real.

by buffalobacker on Feb 26, 2010 5:11 AM EST reply actions  

That's a lot of comments

For something that will probably never happen. It never ceases to amaze me how some people on here have so much time on their hands.

by billskk69 on Feb 26, 2010 7:27 AM EST reply actions  

Proving, In my opinion, lack of leadership and clutch play....

The combine recorded of the teams the Skins played in the first 6 weeks were 0-14 and they went 2-4 against them. They had 1 win over a team with a .500 record at the time they played them and that was Denver and they finished 8-8. Face it, number on paper are NOT by any means a complete testament to a QB who can win in this league.

"If winning isn't everything, why do they keep score?"
~Vince Lombardi~

by Hambone on Feb 26, 2010 11:24 AM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

SB Nation's home for all things Buffalo Bills.
Community Guidelines :: Essential BR

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Finesse Offensive Tackles

Recent FanPosts

Fitzmagical_small
Jackson, Spiller and the Future of Buffalo's RB
Small
Why I'm so focused on drafting QB Brock Osweiler with #42 pick
Small
Mother of all Stats -- Part 2
Slide1_small
Bills Dream Off-Season
Small
Great Site for Learning Potential Draftees
Small
Morning Joe! Free Agent CBs
Uk_small
Quintin Orakpo?
Bills_small
Mocking the Worst Possible Drafts
Small
Morning Joe! Jackson vs. Spiller
Small
My 2012 Bills Mock Draft

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Lead Editors

Img_20110806_213313_small Brian Galliford

100_2488_small MattRichWarren

Senior Moderators

Sucks_small Kurupt

Mrsinister03_small sireric

Contributing Authors

Range_march_2011_small Ron From NM

Slide1_small Der Jaeger

Site Moderators

211_talking_proud_1_small krytime

Santa_bill_small poz

Billsdinosaurrider_small WABillsfan

Avatar31985_4_small silverstreak3k

3850_small JPH