POLL: Which veteran QB intrigues Bills fans most?
We write a lot of long articles on the Buffalo Bills here. We ram news and opinions down your throats as often as we possibly can. Today, as a change of pace, we thought it'd be fun to erase the words in favor of a good old-fashioned poll.
The premise here is simple. We understand that there are players in the poll that you don't like, and that we've also omitted names that you might like (for example, Donovan McNabb and Kevin Kolb). The reasons for the omissions should be obvious; if they're not, ask. Vote and debate (civilly) in the comments section.
0 recs |
166 comments
|
Comments
Jeff Garcia
I voted none of the above because I’d love to see us offer a deal to Garcia. PFT had a story about him now being OK with a backup role and I see nothing wrong with bringing him in to compete with what we already have.
I would love to bring in Garcia, Chan likes those Mobile QB types.
" A wise man once told me, never argue with a fool, becuase from a far, you can't tell who is who" - Jay-Z
by SouthBuffaloNDgrad on Mar 10, 2010 3:33 PM EST up reply actions
He’s 40 and was on an NFL roster for like two weeks last year. When Mike Vick came back the Eagles cut him. Why not just get the guy the Eagles cut him for if you’re scraping the bottom of the barrel?
You can't have CHANGE without CHAN.
Tweet
Buffalo Rumblings
by MattRichWarren on Mar 13, 2010 8:45 AM EST up reply actions
Of the above
Only Quinn, and Smith are intriguing. I voted Smith over Quinn though because of Smith’s stronger arm.
Exactly
Except i voted smith over Quinn because Quinn is on a team without a QB and is about to be the 3rd stringer and Smith doesnt have any strikes against him like that while in the NFL
we the FANS the VOICE the PEOPLE the true BLOOD of the Buffalo BILLS are just doing all this SO mAYBE just MAYbe the Coach THE teAM will just see how us the FANS the the SPARTAN aka BUFARTAN we will not Surrender to know onE.
-abayarde
by uPitt_BillsFan on Mar 10, 2010 1:17 PM EST up reply actions
Even I wouldn't want Quinn on the Bills. What does that tell ya.
" A wise man once told me, never argue with a fool, becuase from a far, you can't tell who is who" - Jay-Z
by SouthBuffaloNDgrad on Mar 10, 2010 3:34 PM EST up reply actions
Wait
Quinn play’s for the Brown’s,no freakin way. And while playing for the Browns hasn’t had huge amountsd of success you say. Are you yankin my leg? / sarcasm. Yea Quinn’s still intriguing. Did you see the browns lions game?
Every second of it
since I live in CLE and don’t have Sunday ticket. The previous week was a clunker and the following week was even worse. That game was more and indication of how awful DET was on defense than how good Quinn was.
He’s played 16 games… How did Peyton look after one season?
You can't have CHANGE without CHAN.
Tweet
Buffalo Rumblings
by MattRichWarren on Mar 13, 2010 8:46 AM EST up reply actions
booo
how can you have non of the above? bad choice people should have to choose. it should be a which one would you choose if you ahd to type thing. NOTA is the easy way out…
Buffalo, that's where it's at baby. - Adam 'Pacman' Jones
LOL. Uh, well, as the Bills themselves can choose zero of these quarterbacks, too, I figured I’d afford the masses the same opportunity.
Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott
by Brian Galliford on Mar 10, 2010 1:08 PM EST up reply actions
i stand by my boooo
maybe an option of “stick with what he have instead” would be ok i guess….but none of the above allows people just to hate everyone without an answer or some kind of plan…
Buffalo, that's where it's at baby. - Adam 'Pacman' Jones
by silverstreak3k on Mar 10, 2010 1:10 PM EST up reply actions
I fail to see a difference. If there was a “stick with what we have,” people would just say “yeah that because all those guys suck.”
If people want to share their plans, they should feel free to do so, but I doubt any re-wording would encourage people to do so. Unless, of course, I asked them to do so.
Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott
by Brian Galliford on Mar 10, 2010 1:11 PM EST up reply actions
i said maybe that option
if you really wanted to let people off the hook. i would still take it out all together.
Buffalo, that's where it's at baby. - Adam 'Pacman' Jones
by silverstreak3k on Mar 10, 2010 1:27 PM EST up reply actions
lol – i’m with you.
why have the poll if it’s none of the above? i say make them pick an option – if they don’t want on of the QBs the just don’t vote.
that way we get a better idea of who the fans would rather have
We got the tools, We got the talent
by J2 on Mar 10, 2010 1:37 PM EST up reply actions
so you want us to look through the comments section to parse out who wants what?
well if you want to for us that’d be great :-)
other than that – i’m with silver
We got the tools, We got the talent
by J2 on Mar 10, 2010 1:43 PM EST up reply actions
to add to that.
when I look at that list – i think the obvious answer is none of the above.
which is why i picked Smith – because out of the QBs – he’s the one i’d pick – or Quinn
We got the tools, We got the talent
by J2 on Mar 10, 2010 1:45 PM EST up reply actions
Smith is the best option in my mind...
I think a 5th and a swap of 6th rnd picks would do the trick…
by NorCal BillsFan on Mar 10, 2010 3:13 PM EST up reply actions
Geez
We can’t even find a concensus on a poll, forget about QB!!
by buffalobacker on Mar 10, 2010 1:48 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
rec’d!
2010 Bills' truth in advertising: "Look out Cleveland, this year we score 6!" - bluecollarbuffalo
by thefourwinds on Mar 10, 2010 2:27 PM EST up reply actions
that way we get a better idea of who the fans would rather have
You get that by ignoring the results of the last option, too…
Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott
by Brian Galliford on Mar 10, 2010 3:31 PM EST up reply actions
Please see the last post I made at the bottom
I think this might clear it up…in regards to who we want to start…my question at the bottom does nothing to help on who should be here as the #2 and # 3 QB
by NorCal BillsFan on Mar 10, 2010 3:34 PM EST up reply actions
right now theres 246 none of the above options. could easily sway the difference between all of them but culpepper or bulger
We got the tools, We got the talent
by J2 on Mar 10, 2010 3:40 PM EST up reply actions
:)
Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott
by Brian Galliford on Mar 10, 2010 4:05 PM EST up reply actions
do you want
malaria, typhoid, cancer, or none of the above??
"huge, big, fast, nasty...all those terms"
what position
does he play?
"huge, big, fast, nasty...all those terms"
ha
but seriously, take out the NOTA and you will have a good discussion about the ramifications of each disease, not just the chicken poop way out of saying “NOTA”
Buffalo, that's where it's at baby. - Adam 'Pacman' Jones
by silverstreak3k on Mar 10, 2010 1:43 PM EST up reply actions
I'll take...
elephantitis…put me down for elephantitis
Man, what a crappy list
Still, I think a short contract for Delholmme (my choice) or Anderson is still the way to go, unless Nix or Gailey feel they really can pick up a Pro Bowler in the draft.
Definitely none of the above
But gun to the head, I just might try to acquire Smith. I pretty much dislike all of those options….
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Mar 10, 2010 1:19 PM EST via mobile reply actions
see
this is why the NOTA is a bad option. id rather have K say he wants smith then say “aw they all suck”. know what i mean. if we have no NOTA at least it breeds discussion besides “ahh they all suck we are dooomeddd!”
Buffalo, that's where it's at baby. - Adam 'Pacman' Jones
by silverstreak3k on Mar 10, 2010 1:26 PM EST up reply actions
I'll bite
Gun to the head. I say stick with what we have. Why give a contract to, or trade for, a guy who really isn’t that much if at all, better then what we have? The only guy I would consider is Delhomme or Bulger because they could be mentors to a younger QB that gets drafted. Even that isn’t worth giving them a contract in my opinion however.
No weekend spent pantsless is a wasted weekend.
well that answers my question i posited further down
on why someone would want delhomme. im guess you wouldnt want delhomme to start a majority of the games? or am i reading that wrong.
in other words, bring delhomme in like the dolphins are retaining pennington?
Buffalo, that's where it's at baby. - Adam 'Pacman' Jones
by silverstreak3k on Mar 10, 2010 1:33 PM EST up reply actions
Yeah, if he earns the spot in preseason..okay let him start a few games, but the plan would be to phase him out and let a younger guy take the reins, hopefully sooner rather then later. Kinda the same way the Giants used Warner.
No weekend spent pantsless is a wasted weekend.
I’m worried that if Delhomme played that poorly with an established, more talented team, how would he fare with the mess in Buffalo?
Buffalo Rumblings Premiere League 2009 Champion
Song recommendation of the week: U2 - Breathe
by TheAfghanTwilight on Mar 10, 2010 1:46 PM EST up reply actions
This is what its come to
I hate to say it but I’ll stick with Edwards/Fitz over these guys. Quinn’s still got potential but I’m not giving up a draft pick for him. Smith is interesting too, it seems like he’s made progress since his rookie year but that’s just based on what I saw in the preseason last year and it would probably cost too mcuh to get him.
Hey, careful, man, there's a beverage here! -The Dude
a 5th round pick and slightly more than an unproven backup's salary?
thats not what I call too much, particularly if you consider that loads of people are talking about drafting a QB 4th, 5th or 6th and then think about what the chances any of them could start this year are. Zip, Nadda, Zilch.
Smith on the other hand would have a decent chance at starting, particularly given the incumbent competition for the spot
we the FANS the VOICE the PEOPLE the true BLOOD of the Buffalo BILLS are just doing all this SO mAYBE just MAYbe the Coach THE teAM will just see how us the FANS the the SPARTAN aka BUFARTAN we will not Surrender to know onE.
-abayarde
by uPitt_BillsFan on Mar 10, 2010 1:25 PM EST up reply actions
And he has not done anything to show that is a bad QB...
granted, he hasn’t done anything to prove he is a good QB, but not being bad would give him the leg-up on our current trio of QBs (except Brohm who looked both good and bad in his one game, as opposed to TE & Fitz)
by NorCal BillsFan on Mar 10, 2010 3:16 PM EST up reply actions
upitt...
LOVE that profile pic. LOVE.
by gatorempire127 on Mar 10, 2010 5:12 PM EST up reply actions
LOL...
Dont like it, but its funny…
: )
by NorCal BillsFan on Mar 10, 2010 6:06 PM EST up reply actions
I think Troy Smith is worth a try
If we only have to give up a 6th round pick to get him, I say why not?
I vote for Brewster is a vote for None Of The Above!
Trent Edwards, baby. Trent Edwards, starting QB for 2010. Let’s do it. Change we can believe in.
Seriously. Trent Edwards.
(In full disclosure, I do not have season tickets, so I don’t have to sit through what could be awful QB play if he continues to suck. But, I do buy tickets to 2-3 games per year. And I believe Trent should be the QB.)
I voted Troy Smith
as his is a book least written so far. I don’t worry about his height, but I do worry that the team may not have patience in developing him.
I’d be okay with Quinn, as long as it didn’t cost the team much. I think Quinn’s much better than what he’s shown so far.
Buffalo Rumblings Premiere League 2009 Champion
Song recommendation of the week: U2 - Breathe
by TheAfghanTwilight on Mar 10, 2010 1:30 PM EST reply actions
may i say
that i am SHOCKED at the people voting for culpepper and delhomme? the others i could see, but those two to me are washed up beyond anything out there….of course that is my opinion. i would love to hear the argument for those two over the other choices….
Buffalo, that's where it's at baby. - Adam 'Pacman' Jones
The only reason that either of those two look remotely appealing as options is their vet status. They have lots of playing experience and they could help tutor a younger player. I still wouldn’t want any of these but I see that reasoning, and would rather do that then give a contract to a guy like Anderson or Vick.
No weekend spent pantsless is a wasted weekend.
I actually did vote for culpepper.
And am clearly in the minority. But I think I read the question a bit differently. I don’t think any of them would be able to “fix” our QB problem. I think that there is very little advantage to any of them over what we currently have.
Both Edwards and Brohm are broken. Fitz is a certified backup. So to me, the question is: How (if at all) can you fix a broken man? How do you get that confidence back when it’s totally, totally gone? I’m looking for more of a supportive mentor than a starting QB. I figure Culpepper is better for that than some of the others.
"...and dance by the light of the moon!"
Though I must say how disappointed I am
that this poll didn’t list Bubby Brister or Steve DeBerg.
Buffalo Rumblings Premiere League 2009 Champion
Song recommendation of the week: U2 - Breathe
by TheAfghanTwilight on Mar 10, 2010 1:33 PM EST reply actions
I had to vote for NOTA – that list is just depressing, if you are looking for someone to groom to get a fresh start to, well we already have that in Brohm, and I’d say he is less damaged goods then Quinn. If you want to bring in a decent back up QB, well we have that too in Fitz who proved last year, he is what he is, a decent back up.
If you want the Bills to find something different then what they have, they are only going to find it in the draft – not to say I think to highly of this QB’s draft class…
I was born in Buffalo, and NO, it's not a suburb of New York City
Im not sold on this
well we have that too in Fitz who proved last year, he is what he is, a decent back up.
by NorCal BillsFan on Mar 10, 2010 3:25 PM EST up reply actions
Are you trying to say you think Fitz is a starter, or isn’t a worthy back up?
I was born in Buffalo, and NO, it's not a suburb of New York City
I dont think he is a quality back-up, he looked okay last year as a back-up because TE was so bad as a starter…I don’t like Fitz because of his accuracy problems, I like him for his guts to throw it where he thinks it should go, he just doesn’t have the arm (he threw deep alot, but never connected) or accuracy (way too many bounces on slant routes) to get it there.
by NorCal BillsFan on Mar 10, 2010 4:31 PM EST up reply actions
He is exactly what he is, a back up, if he could make all those throws all the time, then he would be starting for the Bills, and we would have won a few extra games… Look at what Fitz’s record was last year – can you tell me what the records of those other guys are?
I was born in Buffalo, and NO, it's not a suburb of New York City
I can... : )
Troy Smith – 3 games played, no starts, 0-0 rec.
Jake Delhomme – 11 games played, 11 starts, 4-7 rec.
Derek Anderson – 8 games played, 7 starts, 2-5 rec.
Brady Quinn – 10 games played, 6 starts, 2-4 rec.
Daunte Culpepper – 8 games played, 2 starts, 0-2 rec.
Michael Vick – 12 games played, no starts, 0-0 rec.
Marc Bulger – 9 games played, 8 starts, 1-7 rec.
Trent Edwards – 8 games played, 7 starts, 2-5 rec.
Ryan Fitzpatrick – 10 games played, 8 starts, 4-4 rec.
Brian Brohm – 2 games played, 1 start, 0-1 rec.
by NorCal BillsFan on Mar 10, 2010 6:05 PM EST up reply actions
It's disturbing to me that
..Derek Anderson has 14% of the vote. I mean, really? He had 1 productive year; and not that QB Rating means everything, but Edwards ranks higher than him both in his average and that 1 good year Anderson did have, yeah, Edwards’ 2008 season beat it. I don’t see any upside to him. He’d fit right in with what we already have: 3 apparently mediocre QBs
I voted Smith.
Out of the QBs listed I think it’s only really between Smith or Quinn because they are relatively unknown for what they’d do as full season starters in the NFL.
both have had time to digest NFL playbooks and look at plenty of film on NFL defenses while not getting pounded to the ground and having their psyche broken.
We got the tools, We got the talent
I voted for Vick only because none of the other QB’s have had a history of winning…well there’s Delhomme but I think he’s mentaly shot. I would pick Troy Smith next only because he doesn’t have any baggage
by Circle The Wagon on Mar 10, 2010 1:41 PM EST via mobile reply actions
my mode of thinking right there
vick is the only proven vet that doesnt have one foot in the football player grave. smith is intriguing as a second option, but it would be a toss up between him and quinn…..either way i would be fine.
i really think on this team, vick is the best FIT (what the poll asked). maybe not the best qb option, but the best FIT. with question marks all along the line, vick would be our best asset for a couple years.
Buffalo, that's where it's at baby. - Adam 'Pacman' Jones
by silverstreak3k on Mar 10, 2010 1:46 PM EST up reply actions
How is derek anderson winning? Are bills fans choosing to ignore that 2-17 performance he had against us?
by quantumuprising on Mar 10, 2010 1:44 PM EST reply actions
he's voting for himself?
"huge, big, fast, nasty...all those terms"
He won the game, didn’t he? :)
Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott
by Brian Galliford on Mar 10, 2010 3:32 PM EST up reply actions
That is a popular misconception. He didn’t win that game. We lost it.
Official ledge-talker-offer of the Buffalo Bills.
by WhyBillsWhy on Mar 11, 2010 12:40 PM EST up reply actions
How would you know? You left early.
You can't have CHANGE without CHAN.
Tweet
Buffalo Rumblings
by MattRichWarren on Mar 13, 2010 8:51 AM EST up reply actions
The Internet.
Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott
by Brian Galliford on Mar 13, 2010 10:08 AM EST up reply actions
I voted Smith
Because he fits the athletic big arm guy that I think Nix and Gailey wants. He also fits the mould of what Parcells looks for in his QB’s. I am not saying he will be an elite QB in this league, but I think he is much better than what we have or anything else on this list. I would love to see a combo of him, Brohm as the back up, and Jarred Brown/ Skeleton. I think that increases the talent level at that position. I am all for that.
There was a poll?????
I must have been distracted by the CourgarLife ad.
I took Anderson for three reasons. He would not cost us any picks, he did have one good season not that long ago, and I wanted to see if K’s head explodes :-)
A married man should forget his mistakes. There's no use in two people remembering the same thing!
I actually think those ads are influenced by browsing tendencies. What’s going on over there, Joe? =)
Buffalo Rumblings Premiere League 2009 Champion
Song recommendation of the week: U2 - Breathe
by TheAfghanTwilight on Mar 10, 2010 2:12 PM EST up reply actions
There are entirely influenced by browsing tendencies.
Bill Polian and AJ Smith are gone, so there's not the usual balance between "sane" and "others." Ralph has mentally checked out since 1994. It's a very dangerous time. The coalition for reason is extremely weak.
Get the F.... out of here!!!!!!
I spend 99.9 percent of my time here. The other .1 is spent checking email and buying crap for my kids. I was looking at ear plugs lately, because my ears have been ringing….maybe that did it? Should I delete my cookies or browsing history?
A married man should forget his mistakes. There's no use in two people remembering the same thing!
My head wouldn't explode
Derek Anderson sucks, but so do the rest of the options, and so does what we currently have. Its basically pulling names out of a hat because none are the answer for us IMO.
I just don’t understand how anyone could actually want Anderson here.
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Mar 10, 2010 2:19 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
LOL!!!!! Want is a strong word
I supposed since the Browns want to trade Quinn, we could trade Lynch for Quinn straight up ;-)
A married man should forget his mistakes. There's no use in two people remembering the same thing!
JR made the case for Smith
And I think he was right, smith is definitely worth a 5th. He would have started had it not been for bad timing on that illness. He has been buying his time properly, on the bench of a great organization. I think he could be brought in to compete. I’d drop Fitzpatrick. Brohm, Smith & Edwards – may the best man win!
The way I figure, he’s got as much upside potential as both Brohm & Edwards so why not add him to the mix? Fitz is a career backup at best so it serves no purpose to keep him in a QB competition, I compere him to kelly holcomb
Nothing left to say... the clock is ticking...
None of the above, because....
I’d prefer to stay with Edwards for another year before any of these options.
The Missing Link in the Chan Gang
Options
yeah chipshot there’s alot options out there. keeping ( using ) Edwards could allow us to focus on other needs. God knows we got needs!!!
I voted Smith
He’s the only one I would be ‘excited’ by. I think he may well have the most untapped potential. But then again, I’m still reasonably excited by the thought of Brohm coming good, so maybe I’m just too easily excited(!)
Maybe Vick would be cool, but only because I love the option type offense (Oregon Ducks fan…)
"Don't I know you?"
"Nah, that ain't me, man. I'm from Buffalo"
I voted troy Smith
but then Id go Vick and maybe Delhomme, but otherwise, I think we have all the others on the roster, just younger or in the same boat… been rattled and might not be good enough to make it as a starter in this league
On the hunt... Bills in the playoffs 2010
Since no one else who voted for him posted....
I voted for Bulgar.
He definitely is not a choice I would like to make, but of all the options on the poll he makes the most sense to me (other than the status quo). Bulgar would be destroyed behind our o-line, I know, but he still could provide some vet leadership to the young guys. That being said, I still think a vet QB is only an option if we believe that our QB of the future is on the roster at the same time. It makes no sense to sign a vet, if he going to be mentoring Trent, Fitz, or any other QB who is a project. The only way i can see going down this road is if we draft a blue chip prospect and let them sit so we dont destroy their confidence like we have to every QB since Kelly.
On top of that, Bulgar was a decent (not great or even good) when he was healthy, and more importantly, he wont cost us any compensation. I think that he could keep the QB’s seat a little bit warm while our prospect hopefully learns the game, hopefully away from the Sunday afternoon beatings our O-line would help provide.
So although i think we should stay where we are at with QB, if something too good to resist comes our way in (terms of a top QB in the draft), then we should sign Bulgar.
note: i just proof read this and realized how badly it sounds that we are actually considering all these players as viable options for QB’s.
More options
Trade for Quinn, draft Clausen and Tate, rename the team The Irish Bills, create a new division called The AFC Independent, and get an exclusive contract with NBC. Huh Huh? I can do this all day!
Ok, Seriously, anyone who saw Delhomme last year knows he’s done. Even when he had a decent game you were just watching, waiting for him to throw his next INT and he usually didn’t disappoint.
Hey, careful, man, there's a beverage here! -The Dude
What kind of offense will we run
I don’t know how to answer this because I have no clue what type of offense they plan to run. I mean if its a power run game I like Anderson who will benefit from his arm strength on play actions. If its a spread then I like Troy Smith. If it’s a west coast then Bulger.
I know this is for fun and all, but it is so hard for a fan to pick who the Bills should target on a QB without knowing the style of offense the team plans to implement.
All in all I think Derek Anderson is the most reasonable addition because he provides something most of the others dont which is an incredibly strong arm, which is something Nix believes is important in Buffalo. I am not a Vick fan and the rest do not have extremem arm strength.
I like Derrick Anderson
He showed lot of promise in 07 with the Browns and the only reason he didn’t continue is cause well it’s the Browns. He’s big and has a strong arm to throw in buffalo weatherI think he would be good to bring in I would like him instead of fitzpatrick hes never going to be anything more than a backup
I don't like Derek Anderson
I get what your saying with the arm strength but he’s not going to make the team better. You could say next year the only reason he didn’t do well is cause well, its the Bills. I do agree that Fitz will never be anything more then a backup. I think unless they can bring in a young QB who they think can make the team better, then don’t address the need via free agency at all.
Hey, careful, man, there's a beverage here! -The Dude
by S2 on Mar 10, 2010 2:57 PM EST up reply actions
Anderson could surprise you
If were going to be what i think we are with a run first offense I think Anderson is the perfect guy to handle that He has the deep threa just by being behind center and with Lee on the outside it would be hard for D’s to put eight guys in the box to stop the run
What if the poll had no NOTA option, but instead listed...
all of these QBs along with each of Buffalo’s current QBs and ask the question:
Who would you rather start on day one of 2010?
Then we would have a basis of what we thought of each of our QBs vs what is available to us…
by NorCal BillsFan on Mar 10, 2010 3:33 PM EST reply actions
from what I've seen
for your scenario, take the NOTA total and divide by 3 and you’ll have the % for Trent, Fitz, and Brohm.
There is no mandate, no matter how you slice it.
"huge, big, fast, nasty...all those terms"
this was meant as response to NorCal
"huge, big, fast, nasty...all those terms"
But who, out of what we have, would start?
I want to know what all of you guys think going into next year….
If we did what I suggested, one would be able to determine who we like and we dont like to start next year out of what we currently have and what is available in the FA/Trade market.
Alot of us like Brohm (or his potential), but how many want him to start next year? I don’t like Fitz at all, but how many here want him to start? TE?
by NorCal BillsFan on Mar 10, 2010 3:40 PM EST up reply actions
oh I agree
but I’d bet you can take the 104 votes for NOTA and it would break down about 32/32/32 (rounding). Opinion is that divided. (IMO)
"huge, big, fast, nasty...all those terms"
But there is no way to tell who out of our current 3 QBs
we Rumblers would prefer to start…
by NorCal BillsFan on Mar 10, 2010 4:22 PM EST up reply actions
Brohm
He’s had less opportunity to FU.!!
by buffalobacker on Mar 10, 2010 6:28 PM EST up reply actions
hey
I put a poll on fan post asking the NOTAs (and whomever) which our our 3 current QBs is preferred.
"huge, big, fast, nasty...all those terms"
I voted Troy Smith
I think He has the potential to fit into the kind of offensive scheme that I figure Gailey to run..Ease Him into a passing game while You rely on the run..He’s got enough arm and He’s sat long enough to be able to read the defense better than a rook..He COULD be a solution for us..capitol COULD tho..
Never argue with an Idiot,they'll drag You down to their level and beat You with experience every time..
Yea he could be Reggie Ball 2.0
" A wise man once told me, never argue with a fool, becuase from a far, you can't tell who is who" - Jay-Z
by SouthBuffaloNDgrad on Mar 10, 2010 3:42 PM EST up reply actions
Quinn available ?
I was not aware that Quinn was even available after Andersons release. Even if they draft one they would need 2 vets there ?
"Fan ?" You want to talk about being a fan of the Bills ? Try getting up at 3 AM every Monday to watch their games knowing they'll likely lose. Do this for 18 years and then call yourself a "fan"
He is on the block and has been for some time...
They brought in Seneca Wallace and are still loooking for another vet to add to a possible rookie draftee
by NorCal BillsFan on Mar 10, 2010 3:42 PM EST up reply actions
so bye bye to any chance of getting Clausen
A married man should forget his mistakes. There's no use in two people remembering the same thing!
If we went with who we have
I would want Trent Edwards to get anether chance I still think he can be successful
Thigpen’s clearly #2 in Miami, and I don’t think Miami will move him. Same deal as McNabb.
Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott
by Brian Galliford on Mar 10, 2010 4:05 PM EST up reply actions
Thigpen #2?
Didn’t Pennington re-sign w/ the Fins? Doesn’t that make him #2?
Multiple reports have said that CP10 is #3.
Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott
by Brian Galliford on Mar 10, 2010 9:09 PM EST up reply actions
I have a hard time they'd put Thigpen in over a guy with that much experience
but does this mean Pat White is the odd man out in Miami?
by Donald Driver on Mar 10, 2010 10:40 PM EST up reply actions
Until Henne falters then it's Tyler's Game.
Traning camp, Week 3, or Week 6.
This is like dumping a new puzzle from it's box. Now let's start putting the peices together. I guess this is what we all asked for.
Dude you and Greg Jennings along with the next great QB in A-Rodge are an amazing O
" A wise man once told me, never argue with a fool, becuase from a far, you can't tell who is who" - Jay-Z
by SouthBuffaloNDgrad on Mar 10, 2010 4:28 PM EST up reply actions
jermichal too
but I wish we had lee Evans
by Donald Driver on Mar 10, 2010 10:41 PM EST up reply actions
What a poopy list of fops, flops, and crumbums!
Let me tell you unequivocally, living in STL, that Bulger is a shell of his former self and is not an upgrade over anyone except a few others on this list of castoffs. Brady Quinn is just a less talented version of Trent Edwards, no thanks. Everyone sings the praises of Troy Smith on here, praising his accuracy and arm strength, but I ask you what you’re actually basing that on? He’s done nothing to garner that rep.
Delhomme- N-%#$!&@-a please!
Vick- I understand the sentiment, but really no thanks.
Anderson- I had him on my fantasy team this year during Carson Palmer’s bye week against the Bills last year and he got me -7 points or so. Enough said
Culpepper- What would be the point? He’s not as good as any of our current QBs on the roster.
I still think it’d be possible to lift Jason Campbell for a 3rd rounder from Washington if they take a QB at #4. Just because he got a 1st round tender from them doesn’t mean a trade can’t be worked out for more mutually palettable compensation.
I like Smith and my reasons for why are:
1. He is the only one who is NOT damaged goods (Quinn, Anderson, Culpepper, Delhomme, Vick, Bulger)
2. His price tag is sufficiently low, not like Campbell’s price, trading a 3rd for him would not be wise IMO.
3. He does have a good arm (that translates from college no matter where you played and he happened to play in Ohio).
4. His preseason play earned him the starting spot over J. Flacco, his illness opened the door for Joe who closed it on the way through.
5. He has more or equal potential to Brohm and TE, unlike Fitz who has topped out. JMO, but Smith would be a major upgrade over Fitz.
by NorCal BillsFan on Mar 10, 2010 4:28 PM EST up reply actions
I'm sold
Wish I could change my vote. Troy Smith is the best option. Stil, I believe we’ll need to draft a QB in the 1st next year.
Maybe I was with Delhomme because I thought he would be the best QB to help the team win the Locker sweepstakes.
that would be JP Loseman :-)
A married man should forget his mistakes. There's no use in two people remembering the same thing!
We dont know...
some of us think a 5th and 6th or a 5th and swapping 6ths might work
by NorCal BillsFan on Mar 10, 2010 6:08 PM EST up reply actions
I voted for Smith too
I don’t want any other vet on the list. I don’t even really want Troy Smith that much, but for the sake of the discussion… I’d rather roll the dice with him than any of the other options.
Schmucks don't make it to the Pro Bowl... except Jason Peters!
by Run Thurmal Run! on Mar 10, 2010 6:47 PM EST up reply actions
Which of these QBs would.....
Actually want to be in Buffalo?
I liked Fitzy’s attitude last year but his play was a bit to be desired.
That is what I would look for, a guy that wants to be here and be successful. With that being said and the players on this list: Smith would have to be the best choice.
All the others outside of Quinn may just come here to go to pasture. Ride out a contract and soak up the attention of the coaches that could be put towards someone who could be a good QB for us. My opition only of course.
LETS GET PLAYERS WHO WANNA BE IN BUFFALO!
I am a big fan of Quinn and think he can be good in this league.
If we could trade a 5th for him I do it in a heartbeat.
why?
hes 3 on the depth chart…
Buffalo, that's where it's at baby. - Adam 'Pacman' Jones
by silverstreak3k on Mar 10, 2010 4:47 PM EST up reply actions
He was a 1st Rnd pick two years ago...
at a premium position that is known to all that it sometimes takes time for QBs to grow, so I doubt they unload him so cheaply…JMO though
by NorCal BillsFan on Mar 10, 2010 6:09 PM EST up reply actions
i disagree
they cant be expecting much. its not like the bills can say “hey donte was a 1st rounder we deserve a 2nd” i mean actually that makes more sense than giving up anything higher than a 5th for quinn who doesnt even play….
the market is what it is, they cant expect people to pay high draft picks for a guy that hasnt proven anything either way.
Buffalo, that's where it's at baby. - Adam 'Pacman' Jones
by silverstreak3k on Mar 10, 2010 6:51 PM EST up reply actions
We dont really disagree...
unless you think the Browns would be willing to part with Quinn for a 5th rounder. I think they are looking or multiple low picks such as a 4th, 5th, 6th, or 2 5ths and a 6th…
by NorCal BillsFan on Mar 10, 2010 7:08 PM EST up reply actions
A 5th would be that highest pick I'd give for him, I would give them a 6-7th pick.
" A wise man once told me, never argue with a fool, becuase from a far, you can't tell who is who" - Jay-Z
by SouthBuffaloNDgrad on Mar 10, 2010 4:31 PM EST up reply actions
Me too, but I dount Cleveland makes that trade…
by NorCal BillsFan on Mar 10, 2010 4:33 PM EST up reply actions
I’m with you…I’d love to see him get a shot in Buffalo (or anywhere for that matter).
I’d even give up a 4th for him…or maybe a conditional would be better – could make it more appealing to Cleveland.
Top 3 vote getters not name None of the Above
Troy Smith
Derek Anderson
Jake Delhomme
I need to go vomit.
No weekend spent pantsless is a wasted weekend.
well, at least Vick is not in the top 3
A married man should forget his mistakes. There's no use in two people remembering the same thing!
i was thinking the opposite.
Buffalo, that's where it's at baby. - Adam 'Pacman' Jones
by silverstreak3k on Mar 10, 2010 4:58 PM EST up reply actions
at least Vick is not in the bottom three ??? :=)
A married man should forget his mistakes. There's no use in two people remembering the same thing!
NoneOfTheAbove
what an uninspiring list of shmo quarterbacks. I’d rather have Pennington than any of those guys—speaking of which, is he definitely just staying put in Miami?
I think we’re best served to use our free agent time and money—and for that matter, draft picks too, on positions other than QB. Sure up the lines and bring in some defensive guys that will excel in the 3-4.
I want the Bills to win, and win now, as much as the next fan, but my realistic plan is to kind of scrap this year so new guys can learn and gel, and snag Ryan Mallett in next year’s draft.
"play like hell and win" - perry fewell
by letsgobuffalo12 on Mar 10, 2010 4:37 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
Donte Culpepper
Yes, I said it. And I will tell you why.
He will be relatively cheap. I’d say a 2 year deal with an option for a 3rd for about 4 or 5 million. Maybe even less than that if no one is knocking on his door.
Since his surgery, he has lost a ton of weight. By now, his knee is completely healed. So his mobility should be better than the QBs we currently have. His arm strength is not in question. Its perfect for Buffalo weather. And stronger than the QBs we already have.
He has game experience and can read a defense. This always is useful. By now I’ve just characterized JP Losman. But with Culpeppers ability to use his brain, thats what sets him apart.
Assuming the Bills shore up the O-line in the draft and the rest of FA, I honestly think that this could be a rather good O-line. Again, assuming the Bills draft a LT, Bell develops like I hope, and Wood comes back healthy. Culpepper shouldn’t be running around the pocket. Well, at least as much as would be in Detroit.
His experience (both with Vikings and elsewhere) is invaluable. He knows the highest of highs and the lowest of lows. A QB with this type of experience is great to have because he knows exactly what he needs to do to be good and what to avoid to be bad. This type of experience should be pretty helpful for Mr. Edwards in the long run too in my opinion. Perhaps one last chance will be just what the doctor ordered for Culpepper. It worked with Warner right?
Culpepper has little girl hands and can't hold on to the ball especially in bad weather...pass.
A married man should forget his mistakes. There's no use in two people remembering the same thing!
LOL!!!! Exactly :-)
A married man should forget his mistakes. There's no use in two people remembering the same thing!
Culpepper never liked having to have Megatron hold the burger for him…
by NorCal BillsFan on Mar 10, 2010 6:11 PM EST up reply actions
Culpepper never needed hands to eat all those burgers
He just shoved them in his mouth, wrapper included.
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
I’m suprised more peopel picked Derek Anderson than Brady Quinn. I think the odds are against either one at ever becoming an eliete (or even 2nd tier) quarterback but I would think, if we were goign to persue one of them to throw them into the mix, I feel that Quinn has a higher ceiling.
Neither of these guys were going to succeed in the mess that was Cleveland the past few years (except for Anderson’s fluke season, of course) but I’d like to see what happens if Quinn gets a chance to play on a team with some talent around him…
I guess I could have voted Troy Smith as well…that’s be a project I might enjoy watching as well.
Lynch
A married man should forget his mistakes. There's no use in two people remembering the same thing!
Trade Lynch for Quinn
A married man should forget his mistakes. There's no use in two people remembering the same thing!
You won't get a bag of hot rocks for Whitner :-)
A married man should forget his mistakes. There's no use in two people remembering the same thing!
One over-valued first rounder for another? Makes sense to me.
Official ledge-talker-offer of the Buffalo Bills.
by WhyBillsWhy on Mar 11, 2010 12:41 PM EST up reply actions
NOTA
or go ahead and sign any and all UFA’s, have a QB gong show. Do whatever you want, as long as it does not involve ANY draft picks. NONE of these guys is worth losing any draft pick.
most of my posts get deleted :(

by 























