Potential draft day trading partners
by keysh67 on Mar 19, 2010 4:34 PM EDT
65 comments
I was watching a clip talking about Jerry Jones hosting the Superbowl next year and how this will really motivate him to field a winning team this year. This got me to thinking that he might be a great candidate to trade with if a top player drops to us at #9. But then I realized that he'd be looking at probably the same as us, a top LT. But what if Okung and Bulaga are off the board and by pure luck Berry falls to us at #9, I think Jerry would be willing to sell the farm to pick up a safety like Berry. Chan's relationship with Jerry would be a positive here.
Another team to look out for on draft day is San Diego. I think they'd be willing to trade up to get Spiller. With LT gone they seriously need to address RB and even though they've tendered Sproles at the highest, he's still way too small to carry the complete load, they most definitely need to address RB in Rd1 and there is no way that Spiller gets past SF or SEA. Buddy's connection with Smith will facilitate this deal.
Buffalo currently has the following picks: R1(9), R2(41), R3(72), R4(105), R5(137), R6(169, 183), R7(194, 201)
Advance planning is key
So in my view we make these deals in advance and wait until we're on the clock because if certain players fall to us, we would be better off to stay put. If either of the following 5 players fall to us at #9 then I think we should pick them: Bradford, Okung, McCoy or Suh (these guys are game breakers and all positions of need) or Bulaga because I think he's going to be a day 1 starter and be a solid producer for 10+ years, as blue chip as they get.
First option would be Dallas
If these guys are off the table and Berry or Davis is available to us, then I call Jerry and offer him our 9th in exchange for their 27th + 59th + 91 and a 2011 3rd. Make no mistake, Jerry would be willing to deal if it meant getting his hands on Berry for a reasonable price. He is in the NFC East and having the 20th ranked Pass Defense is not going to get him into the Superbowl.
#27=Jerry Hugues (With Hughes, Schobel, Maybin & Mitchell we'd be set at OLB and prepared for Schobel's retirement)
#41=Rodger Saffold (Solid LT Prospect)
#59=Terrence Cody / Cam Thomas (but I'd be surprised if Cody is available at 59)
#72=Skelton (QB) / Thomas (WR)
#91=John Jerry (G) / Shipley (WR) / Kyle Calloway (RT)
#105= Kyle Calloway (RT) / Ed Wang (RT) / Riley Cooper (WR)
Second option would be San Diego
Assuming the top5 of off the board and Jerry is not interested in trading then maybe Nix could get a deal done with San Diego in order for them to pickup Spiller. If I were them I might be more interested in Ryan Matthews but either way, if they wait until #28 it might be too late because Houston will surely take a RB and I could see the Saints finding a trade partner to get up to get one. I would send our 9 for their 28th + 40th +124th
#28=Jerry Hugues
#40=Rodger Saffold (Solid LT Prospect)
#41=Terrence Cody
#72=Skelton (QB) / Thomas (WR)
#91=John Jerry (G) / Shipley (WR) / Kyle Calloway (RT)
#105= Kyle Calloway (RT) / Ed Wang (RT) / Riley Cooper (WR)
#124= Ed Wang (RT) / Riley Cooper (WR)
So either we come out of the draft with one of the two top OTs, the top QB or one of the two top game breaking DTs or we trade down and get a bunch of extra valuable picks that really help us, a great rush OLB, Solid OT, Starting NT, Solid WR, OL Depth. Maybe I'm nuts but both these trade scenarios seem quite possible to me.
I am quite anxious to see how Nix handles the draft, somehow I think he might be more active on draft day than past GMs.
Note: I didn't mention Claussen because I"m starting to think that #9 is too high for him. I am starting to fear his personality issues. We cannot afford a bust at #9 so I only put down the top 5, who are the absolute 5 closest to "sure bets" in my opinion.
Just another great fan opinion shared on the pages of BuffaloRumblings.com.
1 recs |
65 comments
|
Email
Print
Comments
I like the idea of getting more picks. I think your right about J jones, he will do whatever it takes his man. The position I’m nervous about most is NT. We can’t make it without one.All that waiting in the 2nd(if that’s where we draft one) is going to give me gray hairs.
"This is what happens Larry!, This is what happens! "-Walter Sobchak
by BigEasyBillsKrewe on Mar 19, 2010 5:04 PM EDT reply actions
I’m not a huge fan of Jerry Hughes, also i only think we trade down if Bulaga/Clausen/Bradford are all off the board
"Sure, I've been called a xenophobe, but the truth is, I'm not. I honestly just feel that America is the best country and the other countries aren't as good. That used to be called patriotism."- Eastbound and down...if you like baseball, watch this show it's one of the funniest ever!
I am not a fan of Wang, he came up short... not even sure he is a RT.....wouldn't touch him with a ten foot pole ;-)
I am not sure the Bills trade down unless the QB and LT they like are off the board. I like the Skelton pick. Maybe after seeing how teams have drafted and developed QBs, then traded them for draft picks. Maybe the Bills will get on board with drafting a QB in the later rounds for that reason.
A married man should forget his mistakes. There's no use in two people remembering the same thing!
Funny
’cause the few times that I saw him play, I was quite impressed.
Nothing left to say... the clock is ticking...
I didn't see him play much, but he got owned at the Senior Bowl and combine drills
sure he can run pretty fast and threw up some good bench press numbers, but I remember him getting a lot of holding penalties because he go beat like a drum. Maybe I would take a long look at Wang if I was desperate for some depth and he was still around in the 5th or 6th round.
A married man should forget his mistakes. There's no use in two people remembering the same thing!
Just a Question, Sorta Off Topic
First let me say I love this site, and occasionally contribute a comment, based on my opinion. But, I have to ask: How do you guys know so much about all these college football players? I run my business and take care of my family and have a small amount of time to dedicate to my Bills. How do you do it?
Mikeo76
LOL
mikeo76, I hear ya I’m amazed as well. I’ve loved me some Bill’s for 31 years but never knew how many, and how informed some of these guys are. Besides how they do it? I’d like to know average age of BR’s and would they consider themselves “jocks or nerds?”
by buffalobacker on Mar 19, 2010 6:55 PM EDT up reply actions
It is easy guys....you just have to make a serious effort to ignore your work responsibilities and family :-)
A married man should forget his mistakes. There's no use in two people remembering the same thing!
please, for the love of God
do not aspire to be a regular here, it will ruin your chance to have a real life!
Family comes second. THIS IS RUMBLINGS!!!!!!!(Followed by a kick in the chest)
"Sure, I've been called a xenophobe, but the truth is, I'm not. I honestly just feel that America is the best country and the other countries aren't as good. That used to be called patriotism."- Eastbound and down...if you like baseball, watch this show it's one of the funniest ever!
Well
Welcome aboard. I can tell you one way to learn about these guys in the draft is watch Mike Mayock on NFL Network. As far as guys on TV he is the best. Another site to check out is mockingthedraft.com, Stop over there for 10 minutes at a time, you can really pick up a lot of info.
by The Irishman on Mar 19, 2010 8:29 PM EDT up reply actions
To be honest I realize that I have issues… I am seriously addicted.
I watch at least 4 games per week during the season and at least 2 college games. I spend maybe 2hrs daily scanning various football news and rumor sites. I normally identify the positions of need for our Bills and iidentify the top guys that are either juniors or seniors and try to catch as many games during the season as I can. I PVR them so I can watch them after hours.
I love the management side of the business so I do a lot of research. I prefer doing this than watching boring TV shows. My wife likes watching shows that I don’t so it makes it quite easy.
Nothing left to say... the clock is ticking...
Four words for mikeo76:
Fantasy Football Dynasty Leagues…
Full blown addict here =P
Schmucks don't make it to the Pro Bowl... except Jason Peters!
by Run Thurmal Run! on Mar 19, 2010 9:23 PM EDT up reply actions
LOL!
I appreciate all your honesty! I’m not saying I’m old, but I attended the first game the Bills ever played at the Rock Pile, so I do have a claim of some history of my beloved Bills.
I live in ATL now, but I go to my favorite bar to watch the Bills every week.
IMHO, I like what I see from “CHIX”. It’s the best management I’ve seen in a long time.
Your opinion?
MikeO
Opinion
I watched my first NFL game at Rich stadium when O.J. was playing, been a fan since. I think there doing fine, but the bar is kinda low. Seeing them play live again is on my wishlist. Along with 2 chicks and a Harley! I’m gettin kinda impatient for some playoff love. But yeah new FO acting reasonably sane to this point. Be careful its addictive.:)
If the San Diego scenario happened...
…I would be a very happen man. Really I could very happy with either or them. I’m very big on Hughes (26.5 sacks the last two years) and to pick up Cody and Saffold in the deal would be almost too much to ask for. I would take Thomas over Skelton if he fell to the third round though despite the QB need.
That said, I don’t see it happening. They would have to really like Spiller; Smith prefers to build through the draft. Also, Nix and Smith have a connection from SD, but it did not end well. Jerry Jones probably is more likely to deal, but I still think the odds are very, very low. We can dream though.
I think I prefer Thomas as was (especially given his connection to Gailey) but it’s highly unlikely that he falls that far.
There are other trades worth mentioning:
Tennessee at #16 would be a likely partner to come-up to get Derek Morgan or Joe Hadden, especially if Pierre-Paul is off the board (9 → 16+77+145)
If Joe Hadden drops to us at #9, there are several potential trade partners (we actually could get a bidding war going) such as
Falcons at #19, but the falcons don’t have a 2nd so it’s highly unlikely but I’d be willing to do it for a 2011 2nd (9 → 19 + 146 +2011 2nd)
Houston at #20, they play Peyton twice per year – they desperately need some star power at the corner position (9 → 20 + 51 + 178)
Another possible team to consider is Minnesota, they desperately need help at corner and they probably would pull out the stops for a chance at Hadden (9 → 30 + 126 + 2011 2nd)
If we move to say 16 or 20 and Spiller is off the board, then maybe we call the Saints and SD to see how bad they want Matthews or Best
Rebuilding is fun because you can afford to stock pile. I really hope that Nix is active on Draft day.
Nothing left to say... the clock is ticking...
I'd like any reasonable trade down...
…especially if we can land some more picks in the second. I just can’t think of the last time we traded down in the first couple of rounds. Anyone remember?
by PozDispenser on Mar 20, 2010 5:35 PM EDT up reply actions
And we haven’t had a decent GM in a very long while so I’m not sure you can conclude anything from the response.
Nothing left to say... the clock is ticking...
Fair point
I like what Nix has done so far, although it’s still really early. Either way, it seems like we have to have the cards fall correctly. I suppose I’m just moderating expectations here. If there is one thing I want to happen, it is to get two picks between 33 and 64. More than that, I’d really like to get the better of somebody in a deal. Unfortunately, most every team I’d want to put one over on are run by people just too smart to let that happen (looking at you Belichick).
by PozDispenser on Mar 20, 2010 9:13 PM EDT up reply actions
You’re looking at this the wrong way… The way I see it, a team that is just a few players away might be willing to do what it takes to get their guy and the best trade is a Win/Win, those are the ones that have a chance at succeeding.
Like I said, the Titans & Texans would be prime trading partners if Hadden falls to us at #9 and I believe both could be swayed into coughing up the picks mentioned if it meant stopping the onslaught of Peyton Manning twice a year. A good trade works for both sides. I don’t think that there are many bad GMs in the NFL, certainly not the teams I mentioned.
Nothing left to say... the clock is ticking...
They might, yes
but it is unlikely. If you look at the last five drafts, only twice has a team traded into the top 10 from outside (Jets for Sanchez last year and Jags for Derrick Harvey in ’08). Thats two times in fifty selections, which makes it a 4% chance. I would suspect that if you did every draft since rookie salaries really started getting prohibitive it would be even a smaller percentage.
The other issue is the depth of the draft. For the Titans and Texans for example, why would you give up a second rounder in a deep draft to pick up a guy (Haden) who probably have slightly higher rated than a Kyle Wilson?
We also have to understand the temperment of the other teams we’re talking about. Of the teams you mentioned, I really think that only the Cowboys or the Vikings are likely to be realistic. Jerry Jones has track record of making deals during the draft, and they are legitimately close to a Super Bowl berth. The Vikings perhaps should’ve gone last year, and probably don’t need anything to make it. I would suspect that they might actually be tempted if either Clausen or Bradford fell (assuming they really liked one or the other).
by PozDispenser on Mar 22, 2010 9:54 AM EDT up reply actions
2001
Instead of taking the OT every had us taking we traded down with Tampa Bay (who took the same bust) and we picked up an extra 2nd. Those 3 picks ended up being Nate Clements, Aaron Schobel and Travis Henry. Was Donahoe’s only good draft.
"Fan ?" You want to talk about being a fan of the Bills ? Try getting up at 3 AM every Monday to watch their games knowing they'll likely lose. Do this for 18 years and then call yourself a "fan"
Hughes
I like your ideas with either team, my question is——-is Hughes the pass rushing OLB that we need or is there a better option????
yeah, and Jason Peters never got blew up, right?
Bulaga also stoned Morgan
A married man should forget his mistakes. There's no use in two people remembering the same thing!
The question was about pass rushers, not linemen, Joe. Calm yourself, no one’s really bashing Bulaga. :)
Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott
by Brian Galliford on Mar 20, 2010 1:06 PM EDT up reply actions
How am I not calm? Did I use caps :-)
OK…..maybe I didn’t realize they were talking about pass rushers, but I am tired of hearing that Bulaga had one bad day against a very good speed rusher and BAM…..he can’t play LT in the NFL (shaking head CALMLY in disgust).
A married man should forget his mistakes. There's no use in two people remembering the same thing!
I like trading for more picks
I like your idea of adding picks. But moving that far down in the fist will leave us without a bona fide, day one starter, which I feel our team is in desperate need of. With Nix in charge, a Top 10 stud from this years talented draft class, Bulaga off the board or not, is needed on this team.
In effort to add players, I would prefer to see us trade down in Round 2. If a player like Taylor Mays lets say for example sake, slides to our pick in the 2nd, a trade with Dallas for their 2nd plus their 3rd could make sense as well. This would give us flexibility to get another 2nd rounder if a player we liked slipped (ala Levitre). Or we simply take two in the 3rd.
If this more likely scenario were to happen (I say more likely just because I believe it’s easier to give up one 3rd rounder to move up in the 2nd then to commit multiple draft picks to get to 9 – could be wrong on this one) then I think the draft could look like this;
1/ Bulaga
2/ C. Thomas -Dal 2nd rounder
3/ R. Sapp
3/ D. LeFevour – Dal 3rd rounder
4/ B. Bulter 2.0 aka K. Calloway
5/ BPA TE/WR/DT/DE
6/ Repeat above for all remaining picks
will leave us without a bona fide, day one starter
First of all I’m not sure of this. Nix said that after 7 weeks they ain’t rookies anymore, which tells me that he’s ready to let them play and let the cards fall where they may. Is winning in 2010 everything or is preparing our future team more important?
It looks to me like there is a lot of quality players with a second round grade but if we trade our 41 away to be in back of the line we’ll miss out on most of those guys. I personally don’t like the idea.
Nothing left to say... the clock is ticking...
Missing out on who?
By the looks of my mock up against yours, who exactly do we miss out on? If having 2 picks between 40 and 60 are important, like I said above, we could always package both 3rd rounders to get an extra 2nd. Thus, allowing us to take advantage of “quality players with a second round grade”.
Basically, what I believe you’re saying is you would rather be at the back of the 1st round, then the back of the 2nd. And that’s where I disagree. Nix said “a quarterback ain’t gonna be any good tryin to throw off his backside”. Therefore I tend to believe selecting a T very high will be done so to allow the team to properly evaluate Trent and or Brohm. And this alone will make the 2010 season productive, regardless of win/lose.
Selecting Jerry Hughes in the first and Saffold with a high 2nd, IMHO, is a reach.
a reach?
I don’t think so, Jerry Hughes is definitely 1 first round material, watch a few of his games last year and I was quite impressed. Read something this morning that there is even talk that the Dolphins might actually be considering him at #12
Rome wasn't built in a day but there was a plan.
Bradford, McCoy, Suh, Okung - and Bulaga ?
Wow, I cannot believe how people continue to put Bulaga in that class of prospect. I still cannot fathom the sudden popularity he gained here a month ago or what he did to deserve it. Sure he’s a solid prospect, but no lock to be a decent LT. To put him in the same bracket as those other 4 prospects is in my opinion Insane.
If the bills do trade down they might be better served to look for partners between 15 – 20 so we can still pick up a top notch starter at a need position. 29 or 30 seems to far down – sure there will always be a couple of guys who fall that far – but will one of them be a NT, QB, LT ? I’m not as convinced re our need for a rush LB – fairly sure they will let Maybin and Schobel fill that role and see how they go. I do not understand why we’d throw our 1st rounder at that spot when we have those 2 to have a go. Yes, I know they have not played 3-4 rush LB before – but neither have most of the prospects in the draft – most of them have to be converted to the new position as well.
"Fan ?" You want to talk about being a fan of the Bills ? Try getting up at 3 AM every Monday to watch their games knowing they'll likely lose. Do this for 18 years and then call yourself a "fan"
OLB is a need
if Aaron doesn’t came back. And no one knows the answer to that, except Aaron, who is going the Favre route for now. If anything, if we take a OLB early on in the draft it will be in large part due to what the front office believes Schobel will do. I’m sure you agree that if he were not here, we have a significant hole a OLB.
As for Brian, I don’t know who you are referring to saying that people are putting him in the class of the above mentioned names. It’s universally accepted that those players will be picked ahead of Bulaga.
I think Will just meant by being in the same “class” the idea that Bulaga is being talked about as a top 5 pick. Which is surprising, since as he points out, this is sudden popularity. Over a month ago Bulaga was being talked about as a late first, early second round prospect. Then he was a mid-first. Then we were talking about us taking him at 9 and whether that was a stretch. And now a number of mocks are having him go in the top 5. I guess part of it is the fact that Davis seems to be falling fast, but it’s still surprising.
Yeah
Applsoss, thats mostly it – but this article also listed him as one of only 5 players we should take if he’s there at 9.
DJ O – re OLB, no I’m not convinced OLB is as big a need – even if Schobel retires. Mitchell and Maybin on the outside does not horrify me at all. Yes we’d badly need some depth – but I dont see why we spend a 1st rounder on depth. IMO there is no way OLB is as big a need as NT, OT or QB (in no particular order) As a matter of fact I even consider WR a slightly bigger need than OLB. No probs taking OLB in round 3 or later (or maybe R 2 if someone falls that shouldn’t) If we draft OLB in round 1 I’d be disgusted.
Also DJ O – my original post responded to the article itself – not to your comment !
"Fan ?" You want to talk about being a fan of the Bills ? Try getting up at 3 AM every Monday to watch their games knowing they'll likely lose. Do this for 18 years and then call yourself a "fan"
Sorry Will but I have changed my thinking regarding the draft. I really believe in BPA and more importantly the method for rebuilding the team. IMO, we draft as many good solid players as we can possibly draft this year, give them as much experience and playing time, regardless of Win/Loss record, these guys need playing time and need to get up to speed quickly. Next year we’d be in a position to draft our QB of the future as well as another solid lineman.
Rome wasn’t built in a day but there was a plan.
Rome wasn't built in a day but there was a plan.
DJ O
My posting was in response to the article – not a response to your post BTW.
"Fan ?" You want to talk about being a fan of the Bills ? Try getting up at 3 AM every Monday to watch their games knowing they'll likely lose. Do this for 18 years and then call yourself a "fan"
I hear ya
I did think your response was to mine:) My bad.
Here is my opinion of why this happens. Think of Ayers from last year. The belief was that Denver took him in the Top 5 because there were not many solid 5 technique 3-4 ends in the draft. So for them, they saw value in taking him there regardless of where he was slotted before the draft.
And I think more players than ever will drastically slide up and down the board this year. Which will make this think really exciting. I say that because of a deep draft class coupled with the week free agent crop will have teams taking guys, not graded to go where they projected. Take Dan Williams. His value has already shot up the board due to the fact that a true NT is in short supply this year. I personally believe an interesting question is “should the Bills value based on positional depth of the draft, or value players based on individual score?” Discussion for another time I guess. But I hope someone posts something in this regard.
In the end, Bulaga has shot up draft boards due to two key things IMO;
1/ a TON of money is thrown at these kids in the Top 5. Therefore, rightly or wrongly, if a grade is close between players it is not a stretch for a team to select the “safer” pick, aka lower score guy with a much stronger work ethic. It’s just the reality of the situation. And the reason why the NFL and Players Union need to put a rookie salary cap in place.
2/ the deep draft class has made any negative that comes up on a player between the end of the season and the draft, magnified. And conversely, any positive can shoot a player up. But I think Bulaga’s rise may be a product of others sliding down, rather then him rising up, thanks in large part to Smith not participating in his pro day (raising red flags teams may be unwilling to part top dollar for).
Ayers
Was drafted around 18th or so by Denver – I assume you mean the end KC drafted 3rd overall ?
"Fan ?" You want to talk about being a fan of the Bills ? Try getting up at 3 AM every Monday to watch their games knowing they'll likely lose. Do this for 18 years and then call yourself a "fan"
I originally wrote this article with only 4 prospects (guess who was missing…) but decided to add him because he will be a solid player at the next level almost guaranteed. The worst case scenario is he becomes our probowl RT for 8-10 years, he worth taking a chance on.
In both my scenarios we get a starting OLB, starting OT & NT, which are three of the positions of need. If we pick at 9, we must forgo one of them. Given that Schobel is still unconfirmed and more importantly might only play 1 more year if he does in fact come back, puts OLB up there in our needs department. With our great secondary we need to keep pressure on opposing QBs so our secondary can do their thing.
It’s not about winning in 2010, it’s about having the necessary pieces by 2011 and winning by 2012.
Nothing left to say... the clock is ticking...
I agree
that we need to add pieces – just don’t see rush OLB as big a need as the others.
I guess we just disagree on Bulaga – I do not see him being a pro bowl RT for 8-10 years as a worst case scenario. I view him as a guy who could be solid, or could be below par.
"Fan ?" You want to talk about being a fan of the Bills ? Try getting up at 3 AM every Monday to watch their games knowing they'll likely lose. Do this for 18 years and then call yourself a "fan"
Hard to stomach the continued Clausen bashing.
You would take a spread QB [Bradford] who got injured twice on the same shoulder, the second injury requiring surgery, who missed 90% of 2009, who has not shown he can even throw the ball again, over a guy who played most of 2009 with an injury and still carried his team by putting up one of the best seasons a Junior QB has ever put up, playing a pro style offence under a highly respected NFL Offensive Co-ordinator, because you have concerns about his character.
Funny, none of his teammates or coaches has ever said anything about him being a lousy teammate or selfish, but you and McShay apparently know better.
This whole situation is very odd. I dislike ND and have no interest in promoting Clausen’s career but this whole story does not pass the smell test. I doubt that NFL GMs are as dumb and biased as some of their fans. For Buffalo’s sake I hope that is true. You guys need a QB in a bad way, but I doubt that you will select Clausen. More because of Ralph Wilson and his tendencies than ugly rumours and innuendo.
Don't forget the Eagles
If there is a trade down, a possible partner may be Philly at #21. They see themselves as Superbowl contenders and might be willing to trade up to #9 to get the last great player they need to go all the way (in their case a RT). Dropping down to #21 would position us nicely to get a solid player in round #1, and picking up an additional midrange second round pick would help a lot.
Nobody drafts a RT at #9, it’s way too high of a price to pay for a RT, IMHO.
I personally do not see Philly trading up, I cannot see any player they’d be willing to break the bank for.
Rome wasn't built in a day but there was a plan.
Derrick Morgan is a possibility. Probably a long shot, but I wouldn’t rule that out entirely. Or maybe Eric Berry? I could see a number of teams moving up for him if he’s somehow still there.
I signed up for Second Life about a year ago. Back then my life was so great that I literally wanted a second one. In my Second Life I was also a paper salesman and I was also named Dwight. Absolutely everything was the same. Except I could fly. - Dwight Schrute
If Berry falls to us at 9...
It will be like Christmas in April !! We should have no problem at all finding a trade partner.
To a lesser extent, I believe that if Hadden falls to us, we should also have a few trade options available yo us.
I think Spiller could be of interest to a few teams as well.
Rome wasn't built in a day but there was a plan.
Just an FYI, there are a number of Lions fans who think the Bills want to trade up to # 2.
After wiping the tears of laughter from my eyes, I have attempted to convince them that this would never happen, given the history of the Bills and their drafting of QBs in the first round. These die hards are pretty stubborn though. Are there any Bills fans who think that your team would trade up this year with the Lions?
hahaha
These die hards are pretty stubborn though
Aren’t we? Anybody willing to continue to support crappy teams like the Lions & Bills normally are quite stubborn and set in their ways…
Rome wasn't built in a day but there was a plan.
Trading up with the Lions for the #2 Pick???
Money, Money, Money, Money and more money. We are short on WR’s, RB’s, OL, NT, pass rushers (OLB’s). Maybe if the lions would swap even up for our #9.
This is like dumping a new puzzle from it's box. Now let's start putting the peices together. I guess this is what we all asked for.
Not for number 2. I’m a Ralph Wilson defender in terms of spending, but I can’t imagine he and Buddy Nix would be remotely interested in giving up extremely valuable picks to add a contract as big as the 2nd pick.
I signed up for Second Life about a year ago. Back then my life was so great that I literally wanted a second one. In my Second Life I was also a paper salesman and I was also named Dwight. Absolutely everything was the same. Except I could fly. - Dwight Schrute
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
SB Nation's home for daily Buffalo Bills coverage.
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Certain photos copyright © 2010 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
