Buffalo and Chester Taylor??
Taylor is expected to draw attention from a number of teams, a list that includes Chicago, Denver, Pittsburgh, Houston, Buffalo and Kansas City.
Probably not true, but if so, this might be an indication of how Marshawn Lynch will be handled this offseason.....
almost 2 years ago
Kurupt
11 comments
0 recs |
Comments
I sincerely doubt this is true.
Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott
but if it was
taylor would be a great addition.
Buffalo, that's where it's at baby. - Adam 'Pacman' Jones
by silverstreak3k on Mar 4, 2010 3:14 PM EST up reply actions
I'd rather have Taylor than Jones
A lot less wear and tear on Taylor, and he’s a few year’s younger.
They are about 1 year apart. If Jones doesn’t get resigned I think he’s an interesting option, probably too big a price though.
by TJJ on Mar 4, 2010 3:42 PM EST up reply actions
But I think
And I’m to lazy to check,that Taylor’s only had like 2 300+ carry years in his career. And Jones has had like 6.
yea taylor is less worn
mainly cuz he sits behind AP. i would take taylor over jones also. both will probably be too much though.
Buffalo, that's where it's at baby. - Adam 'Pacman' Jones
by silverstreak3k on Mar 4, 2010 3:56 PM EST up reply actions
If it happened it would mean they’ve had it with his antics because Marshawn is younger cheaper and even last year put up better numbers. I’d rather give Marshawn another year than do this.
by TJJ on Mar 4, 2010 4:13 PM EST up reply actions
Oh there is no doubt, Jones has far more carries, not even close. I don’t see too much upside to taking Taylor over keeping Lynch.
by TJJ on Mar 4, 2010 4:05 PM EST up reply actions
If so, Lynch must go
This makes sense if they decide to trade Lynch. Which I personally would like to see if it nets us a decent draft pick. I’m thinking Lynch and a 5th for San Diego’s 2nd plus Whitehurst.



















