Browns terminated the contract of quarterback Derek Anderson, the team announced.
6 months ago
Brian Galliford
46 comments
0 recs |
Email
PrintComments
Picture JaMarcus Russell, but not as styrong of an arm an slightly more accurate. But nowhere near as mobile.
The more I see, the less I know.
by CanadianBillsFan on Mar 9, 2010 6:34 PM EST up reply actions
Picture Drew Bledsoe mobility.
The more I see, the less I know.
by CanadianBillsFan on Mar 9, 2010 8:39 PM EST up reply actions
oh no
Don’t even think about it nix
"you just have to know there's always going to be adversity. None of these games are going to be easy. Nothing will be given to us" - Paul Posluszny
by poz on Mar 9, 2010 3:01 PM EST via mobile reply actions 1 recs
then both of you rec it!!!
click actions – rec
We got the tools, We got the talent
by J2 on Mar 9, 2010 4:50 PM EST up reply actions
A plus is higher than agreeing, but not quite as good a a rec.
That is that we have our own reting system going here.
The more I see, the less I know.
by CanadianBillsFan on Mar 9, 2010 6:35 PM EST up reply actions
id say
throw him in a blender with JP Losman, Holcomb, T Edwards, Fitzpatrick and whoever else and see what happens. Maybe just have each guy start 1-2 games and play musical chairs. Or the fans could vote. All I know is he completed 2 passes or was it one when they played at the Ralph last season?
MARVelous - "I went from America's team to North America's Team" Terrell Owens
What does this have to do with the Bills?
Anderson is a pile of garbage and has been a total scrub since he’s fluke season.
In his last 18 games (16 starts) he’s completed a whopping 223 passes in 465 attempts, which is a stellar 47.9 completion percentage, for 2503 yards. That averages out to 5.38 yards per attempt. He has 12 TD’s and 18 INT’s in that time, with 5 lost fumbles too.
I’d be concerned if the Bills considered Anderson a viable option, even in the short term.
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Mar 9, 2010 3:05 PM EST reply actions 3 recs
yea
what he said
Buffalo, that's where it's at baby. - Adam 'Pacman' Jones
by silverstreak3k on Mar 9, 2010 3:08 PM EST up reply actions
um......
WR talent was no Bueno in Cleveland…….
Take that into account as well.
The only cure for a bad today is tomorrow.
by norcaliangelsfan on Mar 9, 2010 3:32 PM EST up reply actions
Sure
But those numbers are atrocious
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
well to his credit.......
he’s had a better pro season than any of the guys on our current roster………
lol
The only cure for a bad today is tomorrow.
by norcaliangelsfan on Mar 9, 2010 3:52 PM EST up reply actions
At this point
I’m concerned for any bills qb because we have yet establish that we will focus on the O-line. You see the bills getting a lot of skilled prospects from the draft but yet to work out at OT. The trenches is where the game is won and lost and let’s face it, it doesn’t matter who the QB is if he has no line.
by danntheman on Mar 9, 2010 3:16 PM EST via mobile reply actions
I’d rather become a Jets fan than see either start for us next year. And I LOATH the Jets.
The more I see, the less I know.
by CanadianBillsFan on Mar 9, 2010 6:38 PM EST up reply actions
pass
he’ll be a raider soon enough. If they are going to bring in a journeyman qb who is doomed to fail, let’s bring one in who comes from a culture of winning. for that reason and that reason only the only viable FA QB to fit the bill is Delhomme. So let’s draft Clausen if he falls to us.
Later Losman!
Please no
I’d rather have Quinn, he will be a solid QB in this league one day.
You know what.....we should take him.........
Why you ask?
Because…..
He. Is. A. Pac-10. Guy!
:-)
The only cure for a bad today is tomorrow.
by norcaliangelsfan on Mar 9, 2010 3:50 PM EST reply actions
Dude i get that your a pack 10 guy, but still, you have to establish some limits here! ;-)
The more I see, the less I know.
by CanadianBillsFan on Mar 9, 2010 6:38 PM EST up reply actions
Hmmmm let's see
Browns QB status a notch above ours. Holmgren cuts one of them knowing he’d get bupkus for him. Holmgren reportedly a pretty smart football guy.
And we would pick this guy up – why?
"huge, big, fast, nasty...all those terms"
Holmgren says Seneca Wallace > Derek Anderson
For the most part….
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
Anderson = Fitzpatrick
We’ve already got an inaccurate QB that is best suited as a backup on our team.
I never thought I'd say this
But I’d rather draft Tebow,than sign Derek Anderson. OMG this is how it begin’s, he sneaks inyo your brain. Somebody get Tebow out my brain, aaaarrrrrggggggggghhhhhhhhhhh
LOL. HA.
Oh man. Priceless reaction from Kurupt.
Meant to FanShot this to Dawgs By Nature before I ran off to a meeting. Guess I picked the wrong blog. Sorry guys. :)
Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott
Why not?
i see alot of you guys are completly against bringin this guy in, ARE YOU GUYS FREAKIN SERIOUS? do you not remember who we have for qb’s? Fitzy aint S**T, Trent is beat and Brohm does have promise but thats a couples year from now, this guy obviously has had his issues as of late but he has shown what he could do in the right system…maybe his performance has to do with the fact da Mangini SUCKS as a coach, maybe not but why not give him a chance…im not sayin that Anderson is the answer but get the guy in here have him compete if it doesnt work out then move on but to completly be against it is outrages taking into consideration who we currently have in our roster…
by FocusedKnowledge on Mar 9, 2010 4:33 PM EST reply actions
He’s slow and inaccurate. He’s a mistake waiting to happen to the franchise. It’s not like the Browns’ QB situation is settled, so if Anderson isn’t even considered good enough to compete there, he doesn’t deserve a shot in Buffalo.
Buffalo Rumblings Premiere League 2009 Champion
Song recommendation of the week: U2 - Breathe
by TheAfghanTwilight on Mar 9, 2010 5:03 PM EST up reply actions
Dear god NO!
nothing to add after that, it’s all already been said.
The more I see, the less I know.
by CanadianBillsFan on Mar 9, 2010 6:37 PM EST reply actions
?
its fits accurate? trent? you guys talk about GOD NO! we dont even have a decent qb why not bring someone in to see what he could do…a mistake waitin to happen to the franchise? have you not watched buffalo football the last 10 yrs!!! did you not watch it last year how terrible our qb play was, i know the line has to do some with it but i also saw times where they had time to throw i didnt know wat da hell to do with it…so you guys are tellin me that Anderson isnt better than Fitzy or trent? lol really?..jus two yrs ago he was one of the hottest qb’s in the league, was fitz ever? or trent? and dont tell me that 5 game span before the Cardinals game lets b serious now the only reason why he was even praised like that is bc we havent had an ounce of excitement on the qb spot since God knows…again im not sayin that Anderson is going to take us t the promise land by any means but DAMN give the guy a shot, its not like we have a better option, do we?all im sayin is keep ur minds open bc one never knows ppl, Andersons 1 year a fluke? maybe, maybe not…maybe a change of scene does him some good, he has the arm strength to throw the rock up here in good ’ol Buff, get his mind straight and BAM! its 2007 all over again for anderson!!
by FocusedKnowledge on Mar 9, 2010 8:33 PM EST reply actions
Comments For This Post Are Closed
Secondary Sidebar
User Tools
SB Nation's home for daily Buffalo Bills coverage.
FanPosts
Community blog posts and discussion.
Certain photos copyright © 2010 by Associated Press or Getty Images. Any commercial use or distribution without the express written consent of Associated Press and Getty Images is strictly prohibited.
