Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Watch Out For Cowboys UDFA Tim Benford

Inaugural Chan Gailey Approval Ratings

On January 19, 2010 the Buffalo Bills hired Chan Gailey to be the 15th head coach in team history. In that short time, Coach Gailey has put his stamp on the team with several moves. They are listed here:

- Hired George Edwards to be the Defensive Coordinator.

- Hired Curtis Modkins to be the Offensive Coordinator.

- Filled out his coaching staff with names like Bob Bicknell, Joe D'Alessandris, George Cortez, and Bruce DeHaven.

- Made the switch to the 3-4 defense.

- Revamped the strength and conditioning program, hiring John Gamble and Eric Ciano and removing televisions from training facilities.

As with the similar Buddy Nix poll, your task is simple: just tell us whether or not you approve of the job that Chan Gailey has done so far. Not do you like him. Not do you think he was a good hire. Not do you think he will do a good job, but do you think he has done a good job so far? Have at it.

Poll
Do you approve of the job Chan Gailey has done so far?
Approve
1459 votes
Disapprove
119 votes
Not sure
489 votes

2067 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 55 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I voted approve because I like the Gailey hire. I like what I’ve heard about the S&C program. I like the way he sat down with the QBs. Not a whole lot else to approve or disapprove of.

For those that are inevitably going to disapprove, what else could he realistically have done to this point?

You can't have CHANGE without CHAN.
Tweet
Buffalo Rumblings

by MattRichWarren on Apr 11, 2010 9:04 AM EDT reply actions  

Not a whole lot else to approve or disapprove of.

Exactly, wouldn’t you vote for “not sure” than?

I got nothing.

by Jason from OH-IO on Apr 11, 2010 9:31 AM EDT up reply actions  

I approve the two moves.

You can't have CHANGE without CHAN.
Tweet
Buffalo Rumblings

by MattRichWarren on Apr 11, 2010 9:32 AM EDT up reply actions  

Not Sure

I like more than I dislike. The reason for the not sure vote is the switch to the 3-4 in his first year with such a deprived offense. It maybe perfect timing for a switch to a 3-4 but in my opinion it just complicates a rebuild process. We will be practicing against a 3-4 in training camp and the season, but we will be practicing against a very inexperienced 3-4 as well.

YOU ARE OUT of you kuku fufu mine craker laker Flaber baber FUNKI chunki brain. WE want to winn every year -- abayarde

by VanScottM on Apr 11, 2010 9:24 AM EDT reply actions  

WOW

I voted not sure… I don’t care how he goes about doing it, but he must win games… So far I would say I don’t necessarily agree with his incestuous hiring practices, but I guess every coach does that to some extent, I also am not particularly fond of how he has filled out the roster with Nix, but I guess Nix should get more credit/blame for that.

I got nothing.

by Jason from OH-IO on Apr 11, 2010 9:30 AM EDT reply actions  

The point of this poll is to find out what he has done SO FAR. You say that he has to win games….well since the season hasn’t even started yet that is an impossible task.

No weekend spent pantsless is a wasted weekend.

by sireric on Apr 11, 2010 10:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

Very Pleased

We’ll see how his moves work out when the games get played; until then it is all just speculation. However, I see nothing but positives. The immediate switch to the 3-4 is risky, but I can see the rationale. They’ve made some solid, it seems, if unspectacular signings (T.O. was a “spectacular” signing and how’d that work out?), it seems. Lynch has been a problem. If they swap him for a starter, a problem for a contributor, that’s another positive step. Then if we come out of the draft with a new starting LT and NT, plus perhaps some LB and maybe even some QB help, they’ll have to get top marks for their preparation of the team for the season.

by CGoetz on Apr 11, 2010 9:34 AM EDT reply actions  

That is more the job of the GM… Chan doesn’t deserve credit/blame for the personnel moves.

I got nothing.

by Jason from OH-IO on Apr 11, 2010 9:36 AM EDT up reply actions  

I'm Cinga, and I approve this message...

To me, the entire atmosphere at OBD had to change to instill a tougher mental attitude in the players, and the team.. Along those lines, Chan has so far, done just that…

by Cinga on Apr 11, 2010 9:35 AM EDT reply actions  

I voted not sure. I like the workmanlike environment he’s established, and I think the offense he’ll install will be fine as well. I just think we took a big step backwards in terms of our coaching staff on the whole.

Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott

by Brian Galliford on Apr 11, 2010 9:35 AM EDT reply actions  

I agree 100000%

I got nothing.

by Jason from OH-IO on Apr 11, 2010 9:37 AM EDT up reply actions  

Brian, you nailed the reason why I had to choose "disapprove", although I wasn't quite sure why.

“I just think we took a big step backwards in terms of our coaching staff on the whole.”

- I think this is the factor that had the biggest impact on my voting. We finally had a chance to clean house, get an offensive coordinator with experience….and we get Curtis Modkins. (crickets……crickets……tumbleweeds…..) I know Gailey will be running the offense, but man I like more when the head coach is just head coach and lets his other coaches run their perspective areas.

- Getting two S&C coaches is nice.
- Taking out the TVs in the weight room is overrated as an actual move, but I get the symbolism.
- Change to 3-4 defense I am unsure of at this point.

So all in all, the quality of coaches (although it seems as if George Edwards is a good coach….although it’s tough to replace a Perry Fewell) is the biggest factor for me. And while we had the opportunity to really get some good people in here, I think we got alot of “whos that?”.

by StroudFanClub on Apr 11, 2010 11:25 AM EDT up reply actions  

But Curtis Modkins won’t be running the offense. He’s a glorified running game coordinator. Chan Gailey is running the offense and he’s a damn good OC.

You can't have CHANGE without CHAN.
Tweet
Buffalo Rumblings

by MattRichWarren on Apr 11, 2010 1:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think I addressed that, though. I know Gailey thinks of himself as OC

But then I guess we need a HC, right? I just didn’t want the HC to have to be the CEO of the team AND the lead coach of either offense or defense. I want my HC to trust in their coordinators and just manage the overall product, not be into the details of how the offense or defense is running. You get what I’m saying?

I think Brian was with me too on this, when we were looking for a HC. He was also for a strong HC that would hire good coordinators and let them do their jobs.

by StroudFanClub on Apr 11, 2010 2:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

I wanted that, too.

You can't have CHANGE without CHAN.
Tweet
Buffalo Rumblings

by MattRichWarren on Apr 12, 2010 9:50 AM EDT up reply actions  

Ok, so when you made the following statement above:

“For those that are inevitably going to disapprove, what else could he realistically have done to this point?”

Do you now admit that there is at least one thing Gailey could have realistically done (hire an offensive coordinator with the credentials such that Gailey wouldn’t be too burdened with the details of the offense instead of focusing on HC) that he didn’t such that one could disapprove of a decision of his? : )

by StroudFanClub on Apr 12, 2010 10:48 AM EDT up reply actions  

Well I don’t think there were any OCs out there that were/are as qualified as Gailey is to run an offense. His defensive staff is highly experienced so was he going to have a big hand in that anyways? Probably not. He went out and hired the best OC he could – himself.

You can't have CHANGE without CHAN.
Tweet
Buffalo Rumblings

by MattRichWarren on Apr 12, 2010 10:52 AM EDT up reply actions  

I'm tired of making excuses.

I’m saying right now, that I am going to be grading Gailey hard. I will not be grading Gailey on how well he is doing “as coach of the small market, cash to the cap Buffalo Bills”, rather, I will be grading Gailey on how well he is doing “as a coach of a team in the NFL.”

So feel free to grade however you would like. But for me, I don’t care if there weren’t many experienced OC’s available as qualified as Gailey to run an offense. I don’t care if he did “the best he could.” It is Gailey’s job, as HC, to bring in an OC that will allow Gailey to do his job, which is be the Head Coach of the team. If Gailey thinks he can be both HC & OC, then so be it, but he does not get the benefit of the doubt if it is too much to handle, because this is his doing.

In the end, when I am grading the coaches Gailey has brought in here and compare them against other coaching staffs in the NFL, I believe they are lacking. Again, my opinion. But I also think it is an opinion that is universally shared enough so that yes, one can disapprove of this as a decision of Gaileys, and as such, disapprove of the job Gailey has done so far.

by StroudFanClub on Apr 12, 2010 11:05 AM EDT up reply actions  

I didn’t make an excuse, did I? I said he hired the best OC that was out there – himself. I’m not saying there weren’t guys out there, I’m saying Gailey was better than all of them at being an offensive coordinator.

You can't have CHANGE without CHAN.
Tweet
Buffalo Rumblings

by MattRichWarren on Apr 12, 2010 1:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

It's amazing: Our offense is run by Gailey, who is a damn good OC....

but he’s really the only guy on that staff with any good NFL offensive experience. And he’s also got HC duties! Who is he going to bounce things off of and brainstorm with? Just look at this:

Buffalo Bills 2010 offensive coaches:
Chan Gailey- Current HC (1st year), former OC with 4 NFL teams for 8 years combined. Former HC 2 years Dallas. HC Georgia Tech 6 years. Good/great experience.
Curtis Modkins- Current OC, RB coach 1 year KC, 1 year Arizona. RB coach college 6 years.
George Cortez- Current QB coach, 30 years coaching in college/CFL as OC, QB coach. No NFL experience.

Now, you have 1 coach in Gailey, who has good/great NFL offense experience, Mokdins, who has 2 years of NFL offense experience (as RB coach), and Cortez who has 0 years of NFL offense experience (BUT, many, many years offense experience in college/CFL). Thank God Cortez at least has great experience in developing QBs at Cal and in the CFL…that will at least make up for lack of NFL experience.

Let’s compare that to….the Houston Texans 2010 staff:

Gary Kubiak- Current HC (5th year), QB coach San Fran 1 year, 11 years OC/QB coach in Denver. Good/great experience.
Rick Dennison- Current OC, OC Denver 3 years, O-Line coach Denver 5 years.
Greg Knapp- Current QB coach, OC Seattle 1 year, OC Oakland 2 years, OC Atlanta 3 years, OC San Fran 3 years, QB coach San Fran 3 years, O-quality coach San Fran 3 years.
Chick Harris- Current RB coach (9th year), RB coach Carlina 7 years, OC Rams 1 year, RB coach Rams 2 years, RB coach Seattle 9 years, RB coach Buffalo 2 years.
 

So when Houston has any type of meeting about the offense, there are 4 guys in that room that have been offensive coordinators in the NFL before. 4 guys!!!! Imagine how great that has to be for Matt Schaub and the rest of the offensive players? Gary Kubiak can now focus on whatever he needs to as HC, knowing that his offensive staff is top notch and super experienced in the NFL.

I really hope Gailey doesn’t stretch himself too thin with having to run the offense and be a HC.

by StroudFanClub on Apr 11, 2010 3:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

But that coaching staff wasn’t built overnight. Kubiak had to wait for Mike Shanahan to get fired to hire some of those guys, right? Plus there’s a reason those guys only had one year at OC. :-)

You can't have CHANGE without CHAN.
Tweet
Buffalo Rumblings

by MattRichWarren on Apr 12, 2010 9:51 AM EDT up reply actions  

I won't get into the "there's a reason why they only had one year at OC" argument

Cause we could do that all day about Gailey and his resume….so I’ll just say that I don’t think Kubiak waiting for Shanahan to get fired is comparable to Gailey…who/what is he waiting for to hire coaches?

And anyway, I wasn’t trying to get into the who/when/where/why of the situation, just pointing out that it exists (the difference in NFL offensive experience between the two teams).

by StroudFanClub on Apr 12, 2010 10:53 AM EDT up reply actions  

I’m not saying Gailey is waiting on guys to get fired. I’m saying Kubiak’s had the luxury of massaging his staff for four offseasons. He didn’t just magically sign a bunch of top assistants in his first offseason.

You can't have CHANGE without CHAN.
Tweet
Buffalo Rumblings

by MattRichWarren on Apr 12, 2010 1:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

Waiting for W/L totals

I’m not going to criticize before seeing how the season turns out. They obviously have tons of experience.

by Bill Frank on Apr 11, 2010 9:37 AM EDT reply actions  

Not sure

Nothing really to go on yet…

I would vote disapprove if the athletic QB rumor comes true!

~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."

by Kurupt on Apr 11, 2010 9:43 AM EDT reply actions  

Why? Are you saying an athletic QB can't be a franchise QB?

Or is it one specific QB you have a problem with?

"I'm a peripheral visionary." - Steven Wright

by Joe P. on Apr 11, 2010 4:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

No, not saying that at all

~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."

by Kurupt on Apr 11, 2010 6:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

I voted agree

I think the work environment that he’s created is going to be more important that we realize. Not Club Jauron, and not Greeg Williams either. Even keeled, no BS environments produce well, IMO.

Another addition: Gailey kept Sanders and our DB coach… two smart moves.

Quit, don't quit? Noodles, don't noodles? You are too concerned about what was and what will be. There is a saying: yesterday is history, tomorrow is a mystery, but today is a gift. That is why it is called the "present." --Oogway

by Der Jaeger on Apr 11, 2010 9:53 AM EDT reply actions  

I dont like any of the hires Gailey made on his staff.......

minus keeping the DB coach………..

Pretty sure Nix did the hiring for the strength guys, right? If not…..then you can add those as well to the positive.

But overall, (I know this is gonna be a shocker) I said disapprove……….

Especially after that Fanshot that Matt posted………I mean Whiskey-Tango-Foxtrot? over……..

My-lanta.

The only cure for a bad today is tomorrow.

by norcaliangelsfan on Apr 11, 2010 10:15 AM EDT reply actions  

Pretty sure Nix did the hiring for the strength guys, right?

Not at all. Both Gailey hires. Ciano worked with Gailey at Tech.

Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott

by Brian Galliford on Apr 11, 2010 11:16 AM EDT up reply actions  

well thats why I was asking........

then like I said……the hiring of two guys is also a positive in my eyes.

Thanks.

The only cure for a bad today is tomorrow.

by norcaliangelsfan on Apr 11, 2010 12:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

?????

NorCali said that he likes something Chan Gailey did? WTF is going on around here?

No weekend spent pantsless is a wasted weekend.

by sireric on Apr 11, 2010 12:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'm confused

I hope everything is okay?

YOU ARE OUT of you kuku fufu mine craker laker Flaber baber FUNKI chunki brain. WE want to winn every year -- abayarde

by VanScottM on Apr 11, 2010 6:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

I voted Not Sure

There’s something aloof about a team’s best upgrade being it’s special teams program. Not to mention the fact that players say “no more club jauron” on the first day of voluntary camp. Maybe that says more about Jauron’s tenure. Still, I love the switch the the 3-4 even though it will take time. Not sure about Cornell Green and that offense… which all the sudden is back in 2008-09 mode.

by Kooz on Apr 11, 2010 10:31 AM EDT reply actions  

Not Sure

I can’t make a decision on how he is doing this early based on them doing nothing in Free Agency. I am hoping they have a good draft but to be honest some of those picks we will not know about for 2-3 years. So if they can finish with an 8-8 record or better then I will be happy and change my vote to approval. I am still not happy with the hire of Chan but I will give him a chance.

by Matt Dixon on Apr 11, 2010 10:37 AM EDT reply actions  

I can’t make a decision on how he is doing this early based on them doing nothing in Free Agency.

Wouldn’t that fall more on Nix’s shoulders then Gailey’s?


So if they can finish with an 8-8 record or better then I will be happy and change my vote to approval.

Just change it to disapprove now.

No weekend spent pantsless is a wasted weekend.

by sireric on Apr 11, 2010 10:52 AM EDT up reply actions  

Not Sure

I like the switch to the 3-4….but this is like grading the draft a week after.

New York City Buffalo Bills Backers
www.nycbbb.com

by BillsNYC on Apr 11, 2010 11:02 AM EDT reply actions  

This is more of a long-term exercise in which we’ll kind of chart fan sentiment toward the regime throughout the entirety of said regime. So think short-term, because that’s precisely what we’re asking you to do. :)

Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott

by Brian Galliford on Apr 11, 2010 11:17 AM EDT up reply actions  

approve

with very little to base this vote on I give Chan the approval solely based on the fact he has hire two strength and conditioning coaches that will hopefully address the Bills injury plague. Will it help? I don’t know but he is at least addressing the Bills dreadful IR problem.

by Greg in UT on Apr 11, 2010 11:10 AM EDT reply actions  

Wow 70%, thats a lot higher than I expected!

But I like it, I think that all the moves he has done so far are good moves for the team. Now I’m not sure how that wil translate to results on the feild, but we’ll all have to wait for that. So far so good though, so I approve.

The more I see, the less I know.

by CanadianBillsFan on Apr 11, 2010 1:11 PM EDT reply actions  

I approve.

I don’t think he’s been some kind of savior or anything, but he made a bold choice on the 3-4, and I like Edwards as a DC. Overall, he hasn’t seemed complacent, and that’s what I’ve liked. I wish he brought in some bigger name coordinators, and I don’t love that he’s coaching the offense, but overall, he still gets my approval.

...so I guess now I root for chan gailey...

by JPH on Apr 11, 2010 2:23 PM EDT reply actions  

Good hire imo

I think he knows football and is not afraid to innovate on offense to get the best out of players

the 3 4 is a good move on D although it may take time to get the right players to run the system

He’s always open. He catches a lot of balls. He’s un-guardable, no matter how old he is

by WarWolf on Apr 11, 2010 2:36 PM EDT reply actions  

too early

I voted not sure. I cant approve or disapprove of a coach based on hires and scheme changes. The only way to gauge a coaches performance is by what his team does on the field. Until then, Im neither a fan or a foe of Gailey.

"you just have to know there's always going to be adversity. None of these games are going to be easy. Nothing will be given to us" - Paul Posluszny

by poz on Apr 11, 2010 3:10 PM EDT reply actions  

Didn't like the hire initially..

But now I like it..Just the whole atmosphere He brought in..Not a “Players Coach”,and not a strict disciplinarian..I think that will go a long way towards the players understanding that they have to win a spot on this club because it is after all a business.The coaches He hired look good on paper and have impressive credentials for some anyways.Changing the attitude of the players is an important first part of a total rebuild IMO..

Never argue with an Idiot,they'll drag You down to their level and beat You with experience every time..

by 3nOutNoMore on Apr 11, 2010 3:21 PM EDT reply actions  

Things I like:

- Retaining Catavolos and Bob Sanders

- Moving to the 3-4 defense

- Hiring John Gamble

Things I don’t like:

- Hiring Curtis Modkins as OC

- Hiring Joe D’Alessandris as O-line coach (has virtually no experience at the pro level)

All in all = Not sure

"The one commonality in both places (Oakland and Buffalo) is an aging owner who keeps interfering too much. Ralph Wilson continually butts his nose in the football operation and tells the team who to draft"

by BillsfanfromDenmark on Apr 11, 2010 4:45 PM EDT reply actions  

Also, I still absolutely freaking LOVE that picture of Gailey. So awesome.

Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott

by Brian Galliford on Apr 11, 2010 8:03 PM EDT reply actions  

Hahahhaha....Why? To me it looks like he is thinking,

“Did I forget to put on some underwear????”

"I'm a peripheral visionary." - Steven Wright

by Joe P. on Apr 11, 2010 8:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah I picked it because he looks kinda smug but in a good way…

No weekend spent pantsless is a wasted weekend.

by sireric on Apr 11, 2010 9:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

I like the pic too....

“You talkin’ to ME?? Huh??”" Fuhgeddaboudit……

Love those Bills but we're tired of losing......

by coolness1 on Apr 11, 2010 8:11 PM EDT reply actions  

Approve

Love the S&C move, love the fact that there’s a no nonsense approach now, love the fact that practices are going to get a lot tougher than they ever were during the Jauron era. Taking the TV’s out was good symbolism but that’s about it… Overall I like what he’s bringing thus far. To me the real approval/disapproval is going to come when it’s time to start winning games and making this team more competitive, but since the season hasn’t started yet I can’t judge anything based on that.

by gfbillsfan on Apr 11, 2010 9:08 PM EDT reply actions  

Approve but..

I’m not sure whether its just me liking the moves or liking the fact that OBD is getting the big shake-up.

"To me it would have been a greater play if i'd got it in the end zone" - Terrence McGee.

by ausbillsfan on Apr 12, 2010 2:40 AM EDT reply actions  

I’m late to the party, but I thought I’d vote just because it made it an even 2000 votes.

I actually voted disaprove.

I thought they did a solid job putting a staff together. The lack of NFL experience doesn’t bother me in the slightest because I don’t it matters for position coaches. I like NFL experience in the play callers and Gailey brings that, even if Edwards doesn’t have much of it. I’d rather have George Cortez and his lifetime of experience with QBs over some guy who has some NFL experience, but not all of it with QBs.

I largely voted disaprove based on my belief that it wasn’t a good hire to begin with. Kind of like a political poll where most of the people who voted for the guy who lost the election start out on the disaprove side of the first set of polls.

I’m also not a fan of the move to the 3-4. The only way that Kyle Williams is still on this team in a few years is if the Bills fail to find a real nose tackle during that time. I don’t buy that Poz is all that good of a fit in this D either. If Aaron Maybin is a bust, then the Bills are essentially starting from scratch in the front 7. Granted, that was probably a decision Buddy Nix made before hiring a head coach, it still falls somewhat on Gailey because he took the job knowing he would run that scheme.

I signed up for Second Life about a year ago. Back then my life was so great that I literally wanted a second one. In my Second Life I was also a paper salesman and I was also named Dwight. Absolutely everything was the same. Except I could fly. - Dwight Schrute

by kaisertown on Apr 12, 2010 9:42 PM EDT reply actions  

I largely voted disaprove based on my belief that it wasn’t a good hire to begin with.

But… but…

just tell us whether or not you approve of the job that Chan Gailey has done so far. Not do you like him. Not do you think he was a good hire. Not do you think he will do a good job, but do you think he has done a good job so far?

:)

Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott

by Brian Galliford on Apr 13, 2010 7:58 AM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

SB Nation's home for all things Buffalo Bills.
Community Guidelines :: Essential BR

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Bills_small
An Exploration of Ryan Fitzpatrick's TDs and INTs
Small
Beyond the Perfect Offseason: Where Do We Go From Here?
Dsc00843_small
NFL Divisional Record And Playoff Berth Correlation, 2002-2011
Wallpaper-443169_small
Wacky Waving Inflatable Arm Flailing Tube Men

Recent FanPosts

Bruuuuce_small
Ranking All 32 NFL Starting QB's : Who is ELITE?
Snapshot_20120113_small
Next Stop: 3rd Generation of Winners
Fred_jackson_small
The 2012 (way to early) Fitz projection thread
Bruuuuce_small
The Fitzpatrick Extension: Was It The Right Move.....For The Future?
Snapshot_20120113_small
Thoughts of multiple fans in one head
Small
Kellen Winslow Jr.
Small
Dwayne Bowe
Picture_2_small
Revenge is sweet

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Screen_shot_2012-03-07_at_6 Brian Galliford

100_2488_small MattRichWarren

Authors

Range_march_2011_small Ron From NM

Slide1_small Der Jaeger

Moderators

Sucks_small Kurupt

Mrsinister03_small sireric

Cordy_small poz