Tech pipeline could be a draft factor for Bills
New Buffalo Bills head coach Chan Gailey's last stint as a head coach at any level occurred at Georgia Tech, where he headed up the Yellow Jackets program from 2002 through 2007. It's fairly common knowledge at this point that upon his hiring in Buffalo, he tapped into the coaching tree he cultivated at Tech rather heavily, bringing in four assistants that worked with him at Tech (along with several other coaches he spent time with in other locations).
Curtis Modkins was Gailey's running backs coach at Tech; he is now the Bills' figurehead offensive coordinator and running backs coach. Joe D'Alessandris holds the same job in Buffalo that he did at Tech (offensive line coach). Giff Smith coached the defensive line and headed up the recruiting effort at Tech, and he'll coach the D-Line here, as well. Eric Ciano headed up Gailey's strength and conditioning program at Tech; now he's splitting those duties down the middle with John Gamble in Buffalo.
The Tech-to-Buffalo pipeline may still be open for business, as well. Despite the fact that Gailey and his staff were relieved of their duties after the 2007 season, prospects that were recruited to Tech under Gailey's watch are still trickling into the league. There are four Georgia Tech prospects available this year that could all be gone by the second round, and at least two of them could be serious draft-day considerations for Buffalo. We profile those players after the jump.
DE Derrick Morgan (6'3", 266, 4.72-second 40-yard dash): I know what you're thinking. You're thinking that Morgan can't play in Buffalo's new 3-4 defensive system. You're entitled to that opinion, of course, but that opinion is also irrelevant, given the fact that Tom Modrak definitively told reporters on Wednesday that he believes Morgan can, in fact, play and excel in a 3-4 defense as an outside linebacker. Morgan is fairly universally considered the best defensive end available this year, and will be considered by both 4-3 and traditional 3-4 teams. He doesn't excel in any one area, but he's big, strong, fast, underrated athletically, and produced well in his sophomore and junior seasons (19.5 sacks, 28 tackles for loss). Put all of your notions about Morgan aside, folks, because the pure truth of the matter is that the Bills want a pass rusher, and Morgan fits the bill. His Tech status, playing talents and Buffalo's needs make him a truly legitimate candidate to be selected No. 9 overall.
WR Demaryius Thomas (6'3", 224): Though he has not yet worked out pre-draft thanks to a broken foot he suffered in pre-draft preparations, Thomas is still a serious first-round consideration for teams in need of receiving talent. He's drawn comparisons to another former Tech great, Detroit's Calvin Johnson, in terms of athletic prowess, as Thomas is a tall, thickly-built receiver with explosive leaping and playmaking ability. Tech ran an option offense that limited Thomas' opportunities as a receiver, but he still hauled in 46 passes and eight scores at a whopping 25.1 yards per pop. It's unlikely that Buffalo will seriously consider addressing the receiver position early, but they do need to add some talent there, and Thomas can't be ignored - not just because he's a Tech product, but because he is uniquely talented.
RB Jonathan Dwyer (5'11", 229, 4.68): Coming off of two straight super-productive seasons (a combined 435 carries, 2,790 yards and 27 total touchdowns), Dwyer is considered a second- or third-round prospect capable of handling a full NFL rushing load thanks to his size and running style. His workout numbers aren't impressive, but he's a powerful downhill-style runner that runs with conviction, can break tackles with ease, and while not exactly a home run threat can rip off large chunks of yardage. In a fairly deep year for running back talent, Dwyer is one of the top four or five runners available, and while there will be an adjustment period as he leaves the option and learns to catch the ball and pass block, his talent is outstanding. Buffalo may not be terribly interested, however, as they seem more interested in a smaller, quicker change-of-pace back.
S Morgan Burnett (6'1", 209, 4.55): I know. I know the Bills don't need a safety. You don't need to tell me that. Morgan is, however, a vastly underrated prospect in a deep year for safeties. Burnett's a big kid that plays a physical brand of football; he'll be at his best as an in-the-box safety, where his run defense skills can best be utilized. Burnett's capable of making big plays in the passing game too, however, as his 14 career interceptions can attest to. Like Morgan, he's not particularly flashy, but he's talented and polished enough to contend for an NFL starting job right out of the gate.
38 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Great Article
Derrick Morgan would be a great #9 pick. You noted his pass rushing skills, he also is very good at stopping the run
I worry that Morgans not explosive enough
to play OLB in the 3-4. Thomas on the other hand seems like a guy who could be a stud. Dwyer does nothing for me, Burnett seems like he might make someone a pretty good SS. Probably won’t be us though.
The player I would like least at #9 would be my sister’s cat, Captain Creamsicle. She does have a great work ethic and agility, but I’m really concerned that at 9 lbs., she’s too small to play safety in the NFL. She also bites way too often on play action and is easily distracted by someone waving string in the crowd. Lastly, her wonderlic score was pretty awful, answering "meow meow meow" for most of the questions- Dr. Brackish Okun
Depending on the scheme, it’s not about explosion.
The 3-4 that Romeo Crennel ran in NE and CLE has side-designated OLBs; one is typically a pure pass rusher, and the other is a bigger, more powerfully-built player that can take on strong-side tight ends and defend the run.
The 3-4 that Rex Ryan ran in BAL and runs with the Jets requires a pure rusher and a coverage linebacker, which would require more athleticism.
In CLE under Crennel, Kamerion Wimbley was the pass rusher, and they signed Willie McGinest to be that bigger strong-side run defender on the outside.
In BAL, Terrell Suggs is the pass rusher, and Adalius Thomas was the guy they blitzed and used in coverage. Thomas is not a natural pass rusher, but he does have 6 career INTs.
If the Bills are looking to run that traditional 3-4 look that the Pats use, Morgan would be an excellent fit, and he’d complement Maybin quite well.
Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott
by Brian Galliford on Apr 15, 2010 1:40 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Well that works for me then
But how long until people start complaining about Morgans lack of “impact” numbers? Especially if utilized in that way.
The player I would like least at #9 would be my sister’s cat, Captain Creamsicle. She does have a great work ethic and agility, but I’m really concerned that at 9 lbs., she’s too small to play safety in the NFL. She also bites way too often on play action and is easily distracted by someone waving string in the crowd. Lastly, her wonderlic score was pretty awful, answering "meow meow meow" for most of the questions- Dr. Brackish Okun
You run that risk no matter who you draft, do you not? It’s up to the coaches to put Morgan in a position to produce if he’s their guy, just like with any other guy they pick.
Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott
by Brian Galliford on Apr 15, 2010 1:46 PM EDT up reply actions
Have we seen any indications to whether we are using New England or Baltimore’s version of the 3-4? My guess would be the New England version because of Saban’s ties to Belichick and Edwards’ ties to Saban.
by Jeff Winters on Apr 15, 2010 3:06 PM EDT up reply actions
Well, I think if the coaches get their way we’ll be using the Miami version, which is the Parcells version, which is closer to the Cleveland version. Which is why I think Morgan is very much in play for us.
Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott
by Brian Galliford on Apr 15, 2010 3:14 PM EDT up reply actions
I thought as much. We’d be looking at Morgan to play LOLB, over the tight end usually. That would be a good fit since Morgan is pretty strong at the point of attack. Maybin then is the ROLB and he’d be more of a pass rusher, but would still have to drop in coverage a fair amount.
The big difference in the schemes from what I remember is the lack of coverage responsibilities for the rush ’backer (Suggs) in the BAL scheme.
by Jeff Winters on Apr 15, 2010 3:44 PM EDT up reply actions
Exactly right re: your last line.
Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott
by Brian Galliford on Apr 15, 2010 3:45 PM EDT up reply actions
good information...
If the Bills decided to run a 3-4 closer to the system Rex Ryan ran, do you think a player like Ellison would be suitable for the coverage linebacker?
He’d be a nickel ‘backer, getting reps on passing downs, absolutely. He probably wouldn’t play a ton, but he’d definitely have a role.
But I don’t think we’ll run the Ryan defense.
Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott
by Brian Galliford on Apr 15, 2010 3:15 PM EDT up reply actions
Maybin and Misi on each side. Love the abilities of both players and their differnt styles.
But D Morgan would be an upgrade obviously from Misi, anyway, I think a B Graham & Maybn rushing those edges would be lethal. But I love the idea of the 3-4, where the OLB’s compliment each other. Well said, Brian and great info.
" A wise man once told me, never argue with a fool, becuase from a far, you can't tell who is who" - Jay-Z
by SouthBuffaloNDgrad on Apr 15, 2010 11:49 PM EDT up reply actions
Rambling Wreck
Did you really expect Modrak to say Morgan wasn’t able to play in the 3-4?? That’d be giving away info regarding who they may or may not draft. I personally don’t see Morgan being a good at OLB, though he could play there for sure. I think he’d be a better fit in the 4-3. Also, is he that explosive of a pass rusher???
I would not be opposed to Thomas in the 2nd. In fact, I think it’d be a great pick and good value. I’m not seeing many OLB’s that could be worth our 2nd rounder. LT would be Saffold if he’s there, but he may not fit what the Bills want. Cody or Cam Thomas (a bit of a reach) might be around. Tebow won’t be around. Best will be gone. I guess Ducasse could be an option. I think Thomas, if available, might be one of our better options. I like him more than Benn too.
I hope the Bills don’t consider Dwyer. I think he’s going to struggle due to his lack of quickness. The Bills don’t need that type of player.
What about other Tech guys later on? Cord ??? Late in the draft comes to mind….
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Apr 15, 2010 1:15 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
Did you really expect Modrak to say Morgan wasn’t able to play in the 3-4?
He said that about Pierre-Paul.
On Georgia Tech DE Derrick Morgan’s ability to play in a 3-4 defense: Tom Modrak: Yes definitely. He can be an outside back and he is athletic enough to do that. He still has a chance to be a five technique but size is a little bit against him, but he may grow into that. He is a good football player and he will find a way to play and he can play in a 3-4.
On South Florida DE Jason Pierre-Paul: Tom Modrak: I think he will be better in a 4-3 defense. That does not mean you want to exclude him from your thoughts because he has a dynamite future, but his best shot is as a 4-3 defensive end.
I'm with ya in the waiting on Ga Tech players later, I'm sure Gailey knows of some diamonds on the roster.
" A wise man once told me, never argue with a fool, becuase from a far, you can't tell who is who" - Jay-Z
by SouthBuffaloNDgrad on Apr 15, 2010 11:56 PM EDT up reply actions
Morgan Burnett
I know I said I don’t like to do this. That’s why the following statement is a joke…
Morgan Burnett can be our very own Jim Leonhard!
Bias
I am opposed to selecting GT players. I am afraid the familiarity of our coaches with these guys will not allow them to be impartial talent evaluators.
If we select these guys, they better as hell produce, otherwise the draft day decision should be viewed under a microscope.
Also they don’t have a LT, NT, or QB prospect worthy of a 1st round pick, and you know how I feel about that.
I got nothing.
by Jason from OH-IO on Apr 15, 2010 2:26 PM EDT reply actions
Bias....
But Buddy Nix is making the final decision. He’s not going to select anyone without holding a high opinion of him, I’d have to believe. The only bias towards these guys that he might have is them being fellow Southerners…
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Apr 15, 2010 2:34 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
If we select these guys, they better as hell produce, otherwise the draft day decision should be viewed under a microscope.
I’m gonna go ahead and apply that to every prospect, not just these four GT guys.
Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott
by Brian Galliford on Apr 15, 2010 2:44 PM EDT up reply actions
Yes, but especially if they (OBD) makes an incestuous decision…
I got nothing.
by Jason from OH-IO on Apr 15, 2010 3:55 PM EDT up reply actions
Well, a), I think incestuous is the wrong word, because that’s gross. I think you’re looking for “nepotistic.” :)
And I don’t agree. These are talented players. They are four of a ton of talented players. I don’t care where we get talented players, so long as we get them and help them realize their talents.
Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott
by Brian Galliford on Apr 15, 2010 4:12 PM EDT up reply actions
i care where they come from
if your own head coach can already attest to their ability. perry fewell had a long history with Byrd, and knew what he was getting with the pick. i would be comfortable with any of the four prospects. most will be value picks for us if they are still there. i can’t see demaryius still there in second but i could see us moving up for him. and me rikey. ; ) nice article. rec’d
FS Jairus Byrd aka the Buffalo Bills' Silver Lining
Speaking of incestuous, anyone see walterfootball’s mock that has us taking Tony Washington? Bizarre story.
I’d be for it.
Getting your draft stock knocked down for something as stupid as consensual sex at age 16 (even if it WAS with a relative) when his playing level is unaffected is fine by me if they can grab him.
So what are the chances for an Avalanche vs. Sabres finals, eh?
I am the 1st and probably only official member of the David "Dr." Jones fanclub. Until I get the newsletter out, anyway.
Donte Whitner sez: Camp Jauron is over!
by UZ on Apr 16, 2010 9:13 AM EDT up reply actions
I did mean incestuous: Adjective, being so close or intimate as to prevent proper functioning.
I got nothing.
by Jason from OH-IO on Apr 15, 2010 7:13 PM EDT up reply actions
While initially against Washington
After reading everything I could find about the story, I’m inclined to give the kid a chance.
The player I would like least at #9 would be my sister’s cat, Captain Creamsicle. She does have a great work ethic and agility, but I’m really concerned that at 9 lbs., she’s too small to play safety in the NFL. She also bites way too often on play action and is easily distracted by someone waving string in the crowd. Lastly, her wonderlic score was pretty awful, answering "meow meow meow" for most of the questions- Dr. Brackish Okun
Derrick Morgan
With the possibility of 2-4 OT gone by the time Bills pick, why not take the first and best DE? Is Schobel going to be back? Clausen may be too much of a risk and may be gone to Cleveland.
dwyer
i think dwyer has the best chance of landing on this team, if he falls far enough….
Buffalo, that's where it's at baby. - Adam 'Pacman' Jones
Morgan at #9 wouldn’t shock me too much and I’d be for it, I’ve said before as long as #9 and #41 fill two of the “big 4” needs we’re good, no matter which two needs those may be.
Thomas might be gone by round 3, which means I don’t think they should pull the trigger on him.
If Lynch winds up looking like a goner, I’d be for Dwyer in a later round. If Lynch is still around, nope.
LOL BILZ DONT NED A SAFTY. Seriously I’d be willing to take a DB in the later rounds, if they keep working out like they did during the Jauron Era the depth will be helpful.
So what are the chances for an Avalanche vs. Sabres finals, eh?
I am the 1st and probably only official member of the David "Dr." Jones fanclub. Until I get the newsletter out, anyway.
Donte Whitner sez: Camp Jauron is over!
coaches not players
Is what worries more than anything with this story. Morgan was succesfull in college, it’s not like we will draft a player because he’s the coaches neighbor. However that may hold true to the coaching staff. I know Gailey has been around them for a long time and is very comfortable with everyone but what has GT really done in college? They stay compettative that’s about it. 2-3 guys make it in the NFL every year, great, but has their Offensive line been dominant? When was the last OT drafted and was a stud? When was their deffense the best in college? I am all for Gailey hand selecting his staff but this aint college, we’ve seen coaches like Saban and Pitrino come into the NFL with their staffs and do nothing. I somewhat like Gailey as the head coach but their isn’t another guy on that sideline that has OC experience or QB coaching experience at the NFL level. I’ve been a huge advocate of finding the best coaches and again I see us failing at that.
This is a new regime and a new season so I will not say this is a bust or a wasted chance at getting better, because its not. I really like our front office and Gailey has proved he can win. I just hope his staff will perform to the task at hand.
by pastj12345 on Apr 16, 2010 9:27 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
Sorry for the misspelling, typing on a blackberry is annoying. Plus I forgot to hit spell check :)
by pastj12345 on Apr 16, 2010 9:31 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Does your blackberry highligh misspelled words??
Mine does. Maybe you have a different (older) one than I?
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
No or at least I don’t have it setup that way. it is an older model about a year and a half.
by pastj12345 on Apr 16, 2010 4:14 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Morgan absolutely is a better fit for the 4-3. He’s not very athletic nor explosive, has stiff hips and on tape seems very uncomfortable in space.
Thank God, Buddy will be making the call and not Gailey, because Gailey would probably just select this guy and that – in my opinion – would be a horrendous decision. Brandon Graham is ‘my guy’ – another Lamarr Woodley, who fits very well in the 3-4
"The one commonality in both places (Oakland and Buffalo) is an aging owner who keeps interfering too much. Ralph Wilson continually butts his nose in the football operation and tells the team who to draft"
by BillsfanfromDenmark on Apr 17, 2010 5:18 AM EDT reply actions
Graham’s almost as stiff as Morgan in space, though, and Morgan’s a better run defender.
Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott
by Brian Galliford on Apr 17, 2010 9:15 AM EDT up reply actions
I disagree. I view Brandon Graham as a better prospect with more upside and a player much better fitted for the 3-4
"The one commonality in both places (Oakland and Buffalo) is an aging owner who keeps interfering too much. Ralph Wilson continually butts his nose in the football operation and tells the team who to draft"
by BillsfanfromDenmark on Apr 18, 2010 7:08 AM EDT up reply actions

by 

















