I personally would be fine trading the pick if the 4 top tackles are gone

I’d be fine with moving down if they were still in the board. Speeds up the rebuild tremendously, IMO.

I previously posted about this in the Fan Post section.

Obviously, moving all the way down to 24 would be a big drop off, however, we would definitely be getting pick 37 and probably another as well.

Having 3 picks in the top 41 would be HUGE towards rebuilding the Bills.

At 37 I think Cody would be a great pick, as would Saffold at 41.

I really don’t think it is beyond the realm of possibility that Clausen would be available at 24. I would love getting those 3, as laying the foundation for a brighter future!!

They’d probably get #37 and I’d guess Philly’s later 3rd rounder, #87. I suppose they could get 37 and 70, but that’s a lot for Philly to give up.

Remember when Jacksonville moved up from 26 to 8, in 2008 for Derrick Harvey? They gave up 71, 89, and 125, as well as 26. I bet Philly would try offering #70 and #87 as a starting point.

If I’m the Bills, and was willing to trade with Philly, I’d insist on #37 to start, and then probably #87 to complete the trade. #55 and #70 would also make sense, and is closer in value to what #9 is supposedly worth.

Hypothetically, let’s say the Bills trade #9 for #24, 37 and 87, giving them picks at 24, 37, 41, 72, 87 and 107. That would give them a ton of flexibility to move around again and get multiple players they like/love. I might even try flipping that #87 with the 24 to move back up to the mid teens to select Tebow. That’s exactly what Baltimore did after that Harvey trade in order to select Joe Flacco. I’d LOVE for this scenario to happen.