Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Players Ready To Welcome Gay Teammate

Is Jared Gaither Still An Option?

The Bills took a couple of late round OTs on Saturday. Clearly, neither of them are going to challenge for the starting left tackle job. If Wang does indeed get into the starting LT conversation, well, that just says bad, bad things about Bell and Meredith.

The Spiller pick indicates to me that CHIX wants to win some games now. Perhaps Ralph Wilson made clear to Nix that Buffalo needed to hit .500 and be both competitive and exciting in every game. (It would certainly be a nice change of pace for the Bills.) Anyway, CHIX took steps towards revamping the defense and giving whomever starts at QB (Lee Evans threw a TD to Robert Royal during a Titans game I was at....though Royal didn't bother getting his feet down in bounds.) a new checkdown option.

If the idea is indeed to win now, might Buffalo call up the Ravens and inquire about Jared Gaither? It wouldn't fill the glaring need for a franchise QB but Gaither would settle the LT position. The starting QB (Parrish?) might have a second or two longer to decide on which checkdown he likes best if Gaither is in the fold. Apparently, the Bills never called Baltimore about Gaither. According to the Carroll County Times, no one else has either:

The Ravens haven't received trade offers for offensive tackle Jared Gaither, according to Harbaugh. There had been several rumors that Gaither was available for a second-round draft pick. There hasn't been anything concrete to those rumors.

However, the Ravens haven't even garnered a low-ball offer.

Harbaugh reiterated that the team doesn't want to trade Gaither, a 6-foot-9, 340-pounder whom the Ravens feel is a good, young left tackle.

I can't think of a better use for the 2011 second round draft choice than a proven LT. The biggest remaining hole in the roster (QB) would remain but then the Bills could hold an open competition for the RT position instead of handing it to an exile from Oakland. Assuming Wood returns to form the Bills would then field a halfway decent offensive line.

I'm sure Spiller would appreciate it.

Poll
Should Buffalo sacrifice the 2011 second rounder (possibly a pick as high as 33) for Jared Gaither?
Yes.
145 votes
No.
53 votes

198 votes | Poll has closed

Just another great fan opinion shared on the pages of BuffaloRumblings.com.

Comment 30 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

And, yeah, I’d do it in a heartbeat.

It can always get worse. Let me tell you how.

by Ron From NM on Apr 25, 2010 1:55 PM EDT reply actions  

I voted no.

But not because I don’t want Gaither… I’m just not thrilled about the idea of giving away next year’s second rounder. I’m thinking that is we were to try and get Gaither we should at least start off by offering Baltimore the low-ball offer that they still haven’t received. Who know, maybe a third and a fifth would actually be acceptable for them?

The more I see, the less I know.

by CanadianBillsFan on Apr 25, 2010 2:04 PM EDT reply actions  

Maybe a 4th round and a large order of Buffalo Wings

Never confuse movement with action.
~Ernest Hemingway

by NolaBillsFan on Apr 25, 2010 2:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

i would do it without question

if i had the choice. It would make us a lot better in a sec.

Draft Locker with #1 and we are a different team and a competent one

"Hold ya chin up...nuh nuh nuh...gone" -Marshawn Lynch-

by billsoferie on Apr 25, 2010 2:29 PM EDT reply actions  

YES

This is a NO – BRAINER and I am on board immediately. Gaither is big, has great hands and good feet. Did I say he was big? HE IS HUGE and he is a mauler, which is exactly what we are looking for in our power run game. What’s taking so long CHIX?

The time to deliver is now and if you fail to do so you will no doubt witness the consequences first hand.

by Cutter3636 on Apr 25, 2010 2:49 PM EDT reply actions  

Offer Gaither? Where do I sign up

I forsee many QBs with happy feet, blindside hits and brains rattling against skulls in the Bills future without either Gaither or Brown from the Saints. What’s with this not needing to draft a high LT thing with us? Is it an ego thing (“I can create a LT from anything!”, says the Offensive Line coach)? Who’s the highest drafted LT we’ve had?

by telka on Apr 25, 2010 2:50 PM EDT reply actions  

I don’t think Gaither was ever an option. If he were really available, teams would have called. He’s too good of a player to not garner any interest. I think Baltimore is just messing with him to get him to show up to camp. And it did work with getting him to OTAs. Rumors about a trade got him to show up for OTAs pretty quick and I think they were trying to preemptively calm down any issues with him not having a long term contract yet.

I signed up for Second Life about a year ago. Back then my life was so great that I literally wanted a second one. In my Second Life I was also a paper salesman and I was also named Dwight. Absolutely everything was the same. Except I could fly. - Dwight Schrute

by kaisertown on Apr 25, 2010 3:26 PM EDT reply actions   2 recs

rec'd

Show me the baby CHIX, and it better not look like the pool boy from our vacation at Club Jauron!!!!!

by Joe P. on Apr 25, 2010 8:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

All in due time.

There was know way that we were going to address every need in the draft. The fact that the two most glaring needs were ignored seem to really have everyone disappointed with the results of the draft. It’s my opinion that QB and LT are two of the most difficult positions to adequately supply. We all wrestled with who we should take and when we should take them, but either way there was going to be at least two positions that would have gone unaddressed. They just happen to be the two more critical positions. Isn’t this where training camp and preseason comes into play. I am sure that we will be cutting a few veterans in some capacity as will other teams. We just need to allow things to play out and look to improve as the process moves closer to the season start. Right know we have a team that lacks super stars. So that leaves the door open for players to outperform one another and solidify thier roll on this team and in this league.

YOU ARE OUT of you kuku fufu mine craker laker Flaber baber FUNKI chunki brain. WE want to winn every year -- abayarde

by VanScottM on Apr 25, 2010 3:42 PM EDT reply actions  

Yes, please

They won’t though…i doubt Nix would ever part with a draft pick for a player after listening to his press conference yesterday; he seems old and stubborn on the issue…quick question…given the lack of depth on the interior of the Bills’ line post-draft, do you see any of the current tackles they employ being suited for a conversion to guard or center? Chambers played some guard once (not very well against the Pats if I recall). Ramsey is listed as a Tackle/Guard on wikipedia (for whatever that’s worth). Meredith was once considered a guard prospect before the 2009 draft…I would imagine some of these players have to be moving because Calloway and Gaddis are not enough depth on the interior especially with one of the starters coming off a gruesome injury.

Buffalo: Where QBs who are on the fringe of being 4th round picks get 4 years to prove themselves; that's how much smarter we are than the playoff teams! Cost effectiveness.

by Port Royal on Apr 25, 2010 4:18 PM EDT reply actions  

So...

Someone who has a plan and does his best to execute to that plan is “old and stubborn”?

I’m so sick of all the “old” comments. I’m 64 years old and I’m certainly not as physically vital as I used to be, but I’m a hell of lot smarter, because I’ve had so many more years of real life experience!

For what it’s worth, for an “old” guy, here is my take on the draft.

First round we definitely took BPA. C.J. Spiller is an exciting, talented back that is an immediate upgrade for the offense, someone defenses have to plan for. When was the last time the Bills had that situation?

After the first round OBD did a good job of shoring up our run defense. They knew they couldn’t get it all done in one draft so they focused on the front seven. A great move IMHO. Stop the run, force the opposition to throw into a very strong secondary, give the offense, and the defense, more opportunities to score.

But, what do I know, I’m one of those “old guys”.

by mikeo76 on Apr 25, 2010 5:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

My fault

I agree that “old” was poor choice of words. “Old and stubborn” is a cliche that I use and it’s really not accurate. A more accurate description of the tone of Nix’s presser on the team’s web site would be stubborn and condescending.

 I totally agree that Spiller is wildly exciting. I didn’t even look at any of the film on him pre-draft because I had no interest in a running back, but what I saw on him post-draft is eye-opening. I also liked the Troup and Carrington picks given the conversion to the 3-4 and the emphasis this new d has on stopping the run. Unfortunately, the tone of that presser rubbed me the wrong way when he acted as if supporters of this club were ignorant to think that not addressing QB and OT in a serious manner this offseason was a mistake. Nix is not the best at public speaking and Buffalo really should keep him away from a microphone as he his fairly confrontational with a fan base that deserves more respect given their level of support over the years com pared to OBD’s level of ineptitude. I hope he proves me wrong, but I think 2010 is going to be a disaster. We’ll see.

Buffalo: Where QBs who are on the fringe of being 4th round picks get 4 years to prove themselves; that's how much smarter we are than the playoff teams! Cost effectiveness.

by Port Royal on Apr 25, 2010 5:50 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

OK, fair enough!

I agree Buddy is not the “smoothest” GM at the mic.

But, at the end of the day all I care about is results.

Do I think CHIX is the “perfect” front office combination?, Nope!

But do I think it is a serious upgrade from the past few years? Definitely!

Let’s give these guys a chance!

Why do you think 2010 is going to be a disaster? We were 6-10 with more injuries than any club can recover from, and we have done (IMHO) some serious upgrades.

Why should we be any worse than we were in 2009?

by mikeo76 on Apr 25, 2010 6:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

I see absolutely no reasonable solution at QB and LT on the team and I honestly believe they’re the two most important positions on an offense. I’m excited about the conversion to the 3-4, but I think a step back is a given considering what a massive change in personnel it calls for. I’d be shocked if Buffalo did better than 1-5 in the division given how good the Jets and Pats project to be…But really it just boils down to Edwards; I’m distraught that there’s a 75% chance he’s the starting QB again on opening day. I see absolutely no talent in the guy whatsoever and a 4th year where he takes the majority of the snaps is completely unreasonable in my opinion. I really used to love Sundays and I can’t wait for them to be the highlight of the week again…that won’t happen this year.

Buffalo: Where QBs who are on the fringe of being 4th round picks get 4 years to prove themselves; that's how much smarter we are than the playoff teams! Cost effectiveness.

by Port Royal on Apr 25, 2010 6:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

I Understand Your Concern...

but let’s be honest. No matter who the QB was last year he was domed to failure. Fire the OC, switch to a “no huddle” with no real plan, and add on the injuries along the offensive line. Please tell me a QB who could succeed in that situation?

It’s just my opinion, but no one talks about the offensive scheme, and can one of our QBs thrive in a new scheme? Everyone only looks back, at previous failures, and accepts that as the status quo…just not true.

Let’s look forward, not backward!

by mikeo76 on Apr 25, 2010 6:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

Definitely…but itb would be so much easier if forward didn’t include #5.

Buffalo: Where QBs who are on the fringe of being 4th round picks get 4 years to prove themselves; that's how much smarter we are than the playoff teams! Cost effectiveness.

by Port Royal on Apr 25, 2010 6:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

In my mind, 3 years as the nominal starter is enough of a platform for a mid-round pick. I think it’s clear that there’s nothing there worth attempting to develop.

Buffalo: Where QBs who are on the fringe of being 4th round picks get 4 years to prove themselves; that's how much smarter we are than the playoff teams! Cost effectiveness.

by Port Royal on Apr 25, 2010 7:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

Under Normal Circumstances....

I would totally agree with you. But, do you think last year was “normal”?

Change the OC, go to a no huddle offense, screw up the OF line by cutting Langston Walker and throwing D. Bell to the wolves. Are you serious?

Please tell me who would succeed as a QB in that environment?

Just asking.

by mikeo76 on Apr 25, 2010 8:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

it will be unfortunate but I agree

I believe Edwards was so misused by Jaroun that he lost all confidence from his teammates. Edwards play was so dysfunctional after the third week they really needed to scrap the whole no huddle thing and go back to the basics. Still Jaroun prodded along, this hurt Edwards credibility amongst teammates badly. Ryan Fitzpatrick isn’t our long term answer but right now he has to have an edge going into training camp, just because he has the leadership of the team. Just my minority opinion.

YOU ARE OUT of you kuku fufu mine craker laker Flaber baber FUNKI chunki brain. WE want to winn every year -- abayarde

by VanScottM on Apr 25, 2010 8:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

I'd rather trade the 2011 2nd rounder for...

MacNeill

"It has been my experience that folks who have no vices have very few virtues." --Abraham Lincoln

by Bogeyman on Apr 25, 2010 4:21 PM EDT reply actions  

Its too late to trade for him now.

Why waste a future pick on him now when you haven’t even seen what Ed Wang or Kyle Calloway can do? Just because they aren’t big names doesn’t mean they are going to be bad. If you wanna trade for Gaither or some other vet LT than why not at least wait until after next season? We will probably need that 2nd round pick next season with or without Gaither as a Bill so why waste it? If we start a line of Wang-Levitre-Hangarter-Wood-Calloway and they are good or good enough then we can use that 2nd round pick for a bigger need that we haven’t addressed.

by Jasey on Apr 25, 2010 8:29 PM EDT reply actions  

And why...

do you totally discount D. Bell?

by mikeo76 on Apr 25, 2010 8:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

GOOD CALL

My bad forgot all about him. Thats even more of a reason not to trade for Gaither

by Jasey on Apr 25, 2010 8:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

STOP THE NEGATIVE STUFF

WE HAVENT PLAY ONE game and everybody is already thinking we going to be BAD think BIG AND POSITIVE and we the Bills will not SURRENDER THIS year we will KICK BUTT and ask questions later BUYAAAAA LETS GO BILLS stop THE NEGATIVE STUFF

by abayarde on Apr 25, 2010 8:47 PM EDT reply actions   3 recs

rec'd

always a positive comment.

YOU ARE OUT of you kuku fufu mine craker laker Flaber baber FUNKI chunki brain. WE want to winn every year -- abayarde

by VanScottM on Apr 25, 2010 8:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

This guy is always the truth.

Buffalo: Where QBs who are on the fringe of being 4th round picks get 4 years to prove themselves; that's how much smarter we are than the playoff teams! Cost effectiveness.

by Port Royal on Apr 25, 2010 8:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

I Know, I just love it.

I could sit with him at a game anytime any place. It’s all about the game with him. It’s all about the game.

YOU ARE OUT of you kuku fufu mine craker laker Flaber baber FUNKI chunki brain. WE want to winn every year -- abayarde

by VanScottM on Apr 25, 2010 8:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

JMHO....but

we went 6 – 10 with a rash of injuries no team could sustain and be successful yet the nay stayers are saying, with this roster, with no upgrades will go 2-14 or 3-13. Huh?

We made moves to improve this club on both sides of the ball. Please explain your negative attitude, other than the fact that OBD didn’t draft your favorite player(s).!

by mikeo76 on Apr 25, 2010 9:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

SB Nation's home for all things Buffalo Bills.
Community Guidelines :: Essential BR

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Bills_small
An Exploration of Ryan Fitzpatrick's TDs and INTs
Small
Beyond the Perfect Offseason: Where Do We Go From Here?
Dsc00843_small
NFL Divisional Record And Playoff Berth Correlation, 2002-2011
Wallpaper-443169_small
Wacky Waving Inflatable Arm Flailing Tube Men

Recent FanPosts

Bruuuuce_small
Ranking All 32 NFL Starting QB's : Who is ELITE?
Snapshot_20120113_small
Next Stop: 3rd Generation of Winners
Fred_jackson_small
The 2012 (way to early) Fitz projection thread
Bruuuuce_small
The Fitzpatrick Extension: Was It The Right Move.....For The Future?
Snapshot_20120113_small
Thoughts of multiple fans in one head
Small
Kellen Winslow Jr.
Small
Dwayne Bowe
Picture_2_small
Revenge is sweet

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Screen_shot_2012-03-07_at_6 Brian Galliford

100_2488_small MattRichWarren

Authors

Range_march_2011_small Ron From NM

Slide1_small Der Jaeger

Moderators

Sucks_small Kurupt

Mrsinister03_small sireric

Cordy_small poz