Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Randy Moss A Raven?

State of the Bills Roster: Inside Linebacker

The Buffalo Bills are transitioning to the 3-4 defense under new defensive coordinator George Edwards. That transition was the focal point of Buffalo's off-season, as they spent a great deal of time addressing their defensive front seven. DE Dwan Edwards and ILB Andra Davis were added via free agency, and four more draft picks - NT Torell Troup, DE Alex Carrington, ILB Arthur Moats and OLB Danny Batten - further fortify the team's new alignment.

Buffalo now enters the 2010 pre-season with some difficult decision to make at linebacker, and the situation is compounded by Aaron Schobel's retirement indecision. Counting Schobel, the Bills currently employ 14 linebackers, and as many as six of those players could be cut prior to the start of the regular season. Whether Schobel plays or not will impact the inside linebacker position for the Bills, if only from a numbers standpoint.

That fact aside, with three veteran players that fit the 3-4 scheme will, the Bills are unusually deep at this position for a team just making the move. Davis, Paul Posluszny and Kawika Mitchell give the Bills three legitimate starting options at ILB, and the presence of those players could make it very difficult for the rest of the players we profile after the jump to make the final roster.

Star-divide

Positional Responsibilities
As the Bills will obviously be lining up two players at inside linebacker in their base defense, there's some differentiation in responsibilities between the two positions. Our very own Jeff Winters wrote an excellent article explaining the differences not only between these two positions, but between the ILB responsibilities of this 3-4 defense as opposed to other 3-4 variations. Give that a read before continuing on here.

In short, there will be a Mike linebacker that will be asked to take on blockers, while his counterpart, the Will, will be asked to clean up the trash. The Mike linebacker's role is crucial, but as a result of the responsibility differences, the Will linebacker will look far more productive on the stat sheet. Keep in mind, also, that there is room for nickel linebackers to get playing time in this scheme; these nickel 'backers will excel in pass coverage.

Personnel Breakdown
Don't read anything into the order in which players appear below - they appear based purely on level of NFL game experience, and nothing more.

54 - Andra Davis. One of Buffalo's two critical defensive free agent signings, Davis will enter the season as the starter at the Mike position. Already the team's most physical linebacker, Davis will purely be a downhill player asked to take on blockers and play the less glamorous ILB spot. Davis' true value will lie in his experience with the defense; a year ago with Denver, Davis was largely credited as being an instrumental factor in the Broncos' quick transition from terrible 4-3 defense to respectable 3-4 defense. That factor, more than his statistical production, is why Davis is a Bill.

55 - Kawika Mitchell. Recovering from an injury that ended his 2009 season in Week 5, Mitchell is making starter's money, but has steep competition for playing time on the inside. Mitchell best profiles as a Will linebacker in this scheme, but as it stands right now, he does not have the inside track at that job. Mitchell is a smart player that will see playing time; it's just a question of where and when, as opposed to a question of why.

56 - Keith Ellison. Ellison is the toughest player to get a read on in this new 3-4 defense. This is a player that has his uses - he's a good specialist, is a smart, team-first player, and has been productive when called on. But Ellison is also vastly undersized for this particular position, has struggled to stay healthy, and profiles strictly as a sub-package player and specialist. Buffalo has a lot of those types on the depth chart here, so Ellison could end up anywhere from being a solid sub-package contributor and specialist to off the team completely.

51 - Paul Posluszny. There are a lot of young players on this roster that I'm bullish about - Steve Johnson, Shawn Nelson and Andy Levitre chief among them - and you can add Posluszny to the list, too. I liked Posluszny as a 4-3 middle linebacker, but that's not the position he was born to play. He was born to play a weak-side position in the 3-4. Posluszny has also had durability issues, missing chunks of two of his first three seasons, but he's also a tough customer. If he can stay healthy, I expect Posluszny to put up big numbers this season in the tackle department. He's also by far the closest thing to an every-down linebacker on the roster, and he'll be on the field for nickel situations as well.

50 - Nic Harris. Harris is in a similar situation to Ellison in that he only fits into this defensive scheme in a limited role. I realize he's gotten bigger while rehabilitating an injury, but no matter how big Harris gets, he's still a finesse player more comfortable in coverage than with taking on blockers. He was more athlete than anything coming into the league, and now he doesn't have a true fit in this defense. His best shot to stick will be as a specialist.

52 - Ryan Manalac. Manalac is something of an unknown; he's not very big, but he's tough at the point of attack, which means the Bills will probably try him out in Davis' position. That said, his climb to the final roster is a steep one.

53 - Arthur Moats. An outstanding collegian as a pass rusher, Moats is being moved to inside linebacker by Buffalo's coaching staff because he lacks the length of a prototypical 3-4 outside linebacker. Moats is an explosive athlete capable of making big plays, but he'll be adjusting to a new position, so expectations should be tempered initially. He does, however, have significant upside, and will absolutely be a key player on special teams this season.

49 - Mike Wright. An undrafted free agent out of Utah, Wright will directly compete with Manalac for a reserve spot at the Mike position. Like Manalac, he's a longshot to make the final roster, but could sneak onto the practice squad for emergency purposes.

Contract Situations
Davis signed a two-year, $4.4 million deal lacking in glamor, which he'll work under playing a position lacking glamor. Posluszny, meanwhile, is entering the final year of his rookie deal (he'll make $665K this year); if he can stay healthy this season, look for the Bills to sign him long-term. Mitchell has three years and $8.2 million remaining on the free agent deal he signed in 2008.

As for the lower depth players, Ellison will play the 2010 season on a one-year, $1.18 million tender offer, while Harris has three years remaining on his rookie deal as well. Moats is likely to get a four-year deal as a sixth-round pick, and Wright should get two or three years out of his undrafted free agent deal. Manalac's contract situation is unknown, and bordering on irrelevant.

2010 Forecast
Posluszny will be the starter at the Will spot, and assuming good health, will see the most field time of any linebacker on Buffalo's roster. That's a good thing. Davis will be a two-down run defender, and Mitchell will rotate in at various positions as well.

From there, it gets tricky. Ellison and Harris profile as nickel linebackers, and could have an impact in that role - if they make the team, that is. Moats profiles as a Will inside linebacker, and if there's an ILB on the roster that will moonlight as a pass rusher, it should be Moats, not Mitchell. Manalac and Wright profile best as understudies to Davis, and I'm guessing that one of them sticks with the team in some capacity, as the Bills do lack depth at the Mike spot.

My Prediction
Davis and Posluszny are obviously locks to make the team, and I'll add Mitchell to that list, too, even though he's kind of in no-man's land at the moment. That's where things get interesting. 3-4 teams typically try to keep between 8 and 10 linebackers - that's a combined outside and inside - with 9 being a comfortable number. That means that Aaron Schobel's retirement decision will impact how many inside linebackers the team keeps, as it will obviously impact the team's decision-making process at OLB.

Right now, I'm predicting that four OLBs are locks - Schobel, Kelsay, Maybin and Batten. Add in the three ILB locks, and there's room for one or perhaps two more linebackers on the roster. I'll project two, as I believe that Chan Gailey will want to keep numbers at the position to help stock up Bruce DeHaven's special teams units. This isn't even a decision, really; I'm giving those spots to Moats and Antonio Coleman (OLB).

So yes. I'm predicting that half of the players on this list - Ellison, Harris, Manalac and Wright - won't make the team. The team will probably stash Wright on the practice squad, as he's got Mike capabilities in this scheme. If Schobel retires, however, there's room for one of those players to slide onto the active roster - unless the team decides to keep Chris Ellis at OLB.

Previous Installments: QB, WR, TE, LT, RT, NT, OLB, FS, SS

Comment 26 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

POZ!

I to expect big numbers from him and will be a force this year. While he doesn’t have that explosive sideline to sideline range in a 4-3, he will be essetionally covering only 3/4 of the field now. Poz should also get a lot more “clean” looks at the ball carriers seeing he should have some beef in front of him.

by eze on May 27, 2010 10:53 AM EDT reply actions  

I think we’re actually pretty set at ILB. Poz and Davis the obvious starters, with Mitchell, like you said being the first one in for either one of them. I think one of Harris or Ellison make the team as a nickel backer, I think Mr. Winters and I talked about this a few weeks ago?

I also hope Moats makes the team because he seems like he could be pretty good in a year or two.

"Ok, its Gudda hoe, all about my Bills like Buffalo."

by bflo on May 27, 2010 11:12 AM EDT reply actions  

You don’t have to worry about Moats. Barring injury, there’s a 100% chance he makes the team.

Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott

by Brian Galliford on May 27, 2010 11:15 AM EDT up reply actions  

(quote saved for the next "I said that?" article....on the off-chance that Moats gets cut)

: )

"WHEN THE WAGON BLASTER TAKES OFF dont try to get in. THE SPACESES ARE LIMITED FOR WINNING ATTITUDE GODZILLA IS COMING GET READY" - abayarde

by StroudFanClub on May 27, 2010 11:30 AM EDT up reply actions  

haha. That was an awesome thread SFC… When is round two expected?

"Ok, its Gudda hoe, all about my Bills like Buffalo."

by bflo on May 27, 2010 11:36 AM EDT up reply actions  

haha, thanks! I've already started going through the 2009 draft quotes

But I gotta make sure there are enough good ones to be worth a post. I think once I get to the Jairus Byrd selection I should have more than enough….haha

"WHEN THE WAGON BLASTER TAKES OFF dont try to get in. THE SPACESES ARE LIMITED FOR WINNING ATTITUDE GODZILLA IS COMING GET READY" - abayarde

by StroudFanClub on May 27, 2010 1:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

 Oh yeah, from the sounds of it… not too many people were happy with that selection.

"Ok, its Gudda hoe, all about my Bills like Buffalo."

by bflo on May 27, 2010 1:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

Uh oh

Busted

You can add my predictions about drafting Wood and Nelson though. K thanks

~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."

by Kurupt on May 27, 2010 2:05 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

haha

I love the integrity of the post though…damn refreshing

Act like a sober human being, not a drunk Internet username. -- Brian Galliford

by NorCal BillsFan on May 27, 2010 6:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

He’s like the Ombudsman.

You can't have CHANGE without CHAN.
Tweet
Buffalo Rumblings

by MattRichWarren on May 29, 2010 9:14 AM EDT up reply actions  

Alright cool. There is something about him that I like… I think hes going to turn out to be a pretty good ball player.

"Ok, its Gudda hoe, all about my Bills like Buffalo."

by bflo on May 27, 2010 11:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

This might be where we see some roster surprises.

As noted, Mitchell is kind of in ‘no-man’s land’, and makes decent money. If Davis and Poz are the starters, and Mitchell not being much of a cover LB, what situations will Mitchell be playing in? Simply rotating in for depth? Swinging out to OLB on passing downs?

Davis and Poz are locks, and I think that unless he shows poorly in camp that Moats is as well. Ellison could be the 3rd LB if they want a cover guy. If it’s just 4 of the players on this list I could see Mitchell being cut. I think Schobel’s status could really impact Mitchell.

I kind of feel bad for Nic Harris. He has 4-3 LB potential, but it sounds like there’s no fit for him here. I can’t see him making the team, and wonder if any 4-3 would pick him up if he was a late Bills cut.

by Pistol on May 27, 2010 11:15 AM EDT reply actions  

I agree with the OLB comment for Mitchell…posted below before I read all of this.

by 41Meuller on May 27, 2010 11:43 AM EDT up reply actions  

I disagree about Mitchell…I dont see how he can possibly be cut knowing Poz’s injury history…Mitchell is Poz’s backup…that is his role…he is not like Moats or Coleman who are pass-rushing specialists…Mitchell is more important IMO, he the second Will LB…and we could do much worse…

Act like a sober human being, not a drunk Internet username. -- Brian Galliford

by NorCal BillsFan on May 27, 2010 6:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’ll be curious to see whether the Bills keep Manalac/Wright as Mike backups for Davis, or if they’re comfortable enough with some other LB backing up Davis at the Mike and therefore just cut Wright/Manalac.

by Jeff Winters on May 27, 2010 11:38 AM EDT reply actions  

I think Moats is his back-up...

with Wright on PS in case of injury…

Act like a sober human being, not a drunk Internet username. -- Brian Galliford

by NorCal BillsFan on May 27, 2010 6:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

If Schobel Leaves

If Schobel leaves there’s no chance that Mitchell moves to OLB?

by 41Meuller on May 27, 2010 11:41 AM EDT reply actions  

No. OLB in our 3-4 scheme doesn’t play to Mitchell’s skill set – he can’t beat an OT head-up with pass rush moves. It’s much more likely we’ll see Kelsay/Maybin/Batten/Coleman get reps at OLB before Mitchell does. Mitchell is a Will in this scheme, and unfortunately for him, Poz is a better player.

by Jeff Winters on May 27, 2010 11:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yeppers, Mitchell will be on this team this year but once Moats is ready (next season) he will be cut.

by eze on May 27, 2010 12:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

pulling for mitchell

He is a good kid. He is good at a lot of different aspects of LB, but not great at any one. He used to play LB and RB for a pop warner team I coached in FL (so i have some bias). I agree he is not a pure rusher, but neither are Kelsay/Maybin/Batten/Coleman. This team has a lot of tweeners in the front seven and very few 3 down players.

by wab2 on May 27, 2010 4:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

I like Maybin...

but I find it a little funny that he is the exact opposite of Mitchell…

Mitchell is experienced, Maybin is not…
Mitchell is good at several things, Maybin is not…
Mitchell has great blitz timing, Maybin does not…
Mitchell will sit the bench, Maybin will not…

Act like a sober human being, not a drunk Internet username. -- Brian Galliford

by NorCal BillsFan on May 27, 2010 6:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

Solid unit

Should be respectable and productive. I like the Davis/Poz duo with Davis doing the grunt work and Poz getting the chance to roam unmolested by blockers a bit more often. He struggles so much disengaging and beating blockers, so Davis’ presence should help there.

I think Mitchell can play Davis’ role from time to time. I’d much prefer him there over any of the other bozos if Davis were out. He might not be overly physical, but he’d be better than Harris, Manalac or Wright.

I think Moats easily makes the team and I think he rushes the passer from the outside at times, especially if Schobel doesn’t play. How big is he again and could he play some SILB?

I’m pulling for Harris to make the team, with Ellison finally hitting the streets. Harris has much more potential in this defense, especially in the nickel, and I think he’d be every bit as good as Ellison on ST’s. Since when did Ellison become such a solid option in the nickel anyhow?

I think 5 get kept at the position, with potentially another 5 on the outside if the numbers add up. This should be a decent group, barring injury…

~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."

by Kurupt on May 27, 2010 2:30 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

He struggles so much disengaging and beating blockers

.
Why is that? It seems like it would be a technique issue that can be overcome, especially by a player that is as smart, and works as hard as Poz. Is it a physical limitation?

The Eternal Pessimist...

by shrubz on May 27, 2010 3:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

I actually think Ellison stinks at pass coverage, but is really good at blowin' up plays in the backfield...

when he has a chance. But unfortunately, that is not what we are asking him to do now, so he should be gone. I would keep Harris, he keeps getting bigger and I dont care if BG says he is a finesse player, he is the biggest returing LB we have with real coverage skills…he is a SS in a ILB’s body, put him in a passing situation…and he should be an asset.

Act like a sober human being, not a drunk Internet username. -- Brian Galliford

by NorCal BillsFan on May 27, 2010 6:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not a big Poz fan here

and that is no surprise to any BR regulars. It has often been written that Poz was “out of position” or “in the wrong scheme” as the MLB in the read and react 4-3 Tampa 2. Let’s hope his role as the “Will” makes all of us critics eat crow.

by jpheff on May 27, 2010 6:24 PM EDT reply actions  

One position I’m not worried about going into 2010.

You can't have CHANGE without CHAN.
Tweet
Buffalo Rumblings

by MattRichWarren on May 29, 2010 9:17 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

SB Nation's home for all things Buffalo Bills.
Community Guidelines :: Essential BR

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Finesse Offensive Tackles

Recent FanPosts

Small
Buffalo adding picks
Thumb-10488_small
The Bills Not-Need Needs
09000d5d80a96824_video_rhr_280_210_copy_small
Who should be the next Super Bowl halftime show.
Small
Mismatches in the Secondary
1216_large_small
Thoughts including Fitz, a poll, potential trades, free agent signings and BPA
Small
My Updated 2012 Bills Mock Draft - with Trade Down
Thumb-10488_small
The Trade Fred Jackson Thread
Truth1_small
What's the Diggity? Part 2
Small
State of the 53Man roster +$$$
Small
RG III - What If??

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Lead Editors

Img_20110806_213313_small Brian Galliford

100_2488_small MattRichWarren

Senior Moderators

Sucks_small Kurupt

Mrsinister03_small sireric

Contributing Authors

Range_march_2011_small Ron From NM

Slide1_small Der Jaeger

Site Moderators

211_talking_proud_1_small krytime

Santa_bill_small poz

Billsdinosaurrider_small WABillsfan

Avatar31985_4_small silverstreak3k

3850_small JPH