Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Watch Out For Cowboys UDFA Tim Benford

State of the Bills Roster: Running Back

Heading into the 2010 off-season, running back was one position at which the Buffalo Bills had enviable depth. Young veterans Fred Jackson and Marshawn Lynch had emerged as one of the league's best tandem of backs during the 2008 season, and retained strong future prospects even after Lynch served a suspension and lost his starting job a year later. When you've got two good backs, you're generally set at running back.

Then the Bills drafted Clemson star running back C.J. Spiller with the No. 9 overall pick in the 2010 NFL Draft. Suddenly, what was a position of strength for the Bills was now one of controversy, as Spiller's addition immediately sparked trade interest surrounding Lynch.

We're about ready to head into June, however, and Lynch is still with the team that made him a first-round draft pick in 2007. Jackson and Spiller have clearly defined roles in new head coach Chan Gailey's offensive scheme, and there's enough young talent on the team for Lynch to look completely out of place in this lineup. Still, an argument can be made that he's valuable enough to keep around without fair compensation, and clearly, GM Buddy Nix has agreed with that argument to date. An analysis of Buffalo's running backs is waiting for you after the jump.

Star-divide

Positional Responsibilities
This will be earth-shattering analysis, I promise. Buffalo's running backs will need to run the ball well. They'll also need to catch the ball well, and pick up the blitz effectively. Fin.

Personnel Breakdown
Don't read anything into the order in which players appear below - they appear based purely on level of NFL game experience, and nothing more.

38 - Corey McIntyre. Buffalo's previous offensive system(s) didn't require heavy use of a blocking fullback, so McIntyre saw only spot duty offensively and was used as a special teams cover man. That's the role he'll assume again in 2010, but given the fact that the Bills are going to be a run-first offensive team, McIntyre's utility offensively might expand.

23 - Marshawn Lynch. Everyone's new favorite whipping boy has not reported to any of the team's voluntary workouts thus far this off-season; I'm not particularly fussed. Even if Lynch were in town, he's still a decided third in the RB pecking order, and nothing he's doing now is changing that. He'll be here when he needs to be here, Gailey will find ways to get him some touches this season, and he'll be gone either next off-season or when his rookie deal expires. Lynch isn't part of the future at this position anymore, but he's more useful as a third back than he is as a future mid-round draft pick. Good for Buddy Nix on sticking with his guns here.

22 - Fred Jackson. Fred Jackson might be my favorite Buffalo Bills player ever. There, I said it. He's a pro's pro - competitive, productive, professional in demeanor, and not afraid to lead when it's warranted. If I'm a member of this team, I'm voting Jackson as a team captain - that's where he belongs. He'll never be a superstar, nor will he ever be a home run threat, but Jackson just makes plays. He's a pleasure to watch, and I hope he's here a long time. Jackson's versatility as a runner and receiver will be of great utility to Gailey.

30 - Chad Simpson. He carved himself a role as a return specialist in Indianapolis, where he averaged 23.6 yards per kick return and recorded his first return touchdown as a pro in 2009. He also saw spot duty as a runner in Indianapolis' less-than-stellar rushing attack. In Buffalo, Simpson's best shot at sticking is as the default kick returner, where he'll have stiff competition from the likes of C.J. Spiller, Leodis McKelvin and a few others.

44 - Rodney Ferguson. Ferguson has good size (5'11", 245), is a nice cut-back runner, and has soft hands out of the backfield. But he's not a home run threat, and the Bills have too much depth for Ferguson to seriously contend for a roster spot. I like him better as a practice squad option than Joique Bell.

21 - C.J. Spiller. There's not a lot to say here that hasn't already been said. One of college football's most explosive players and one heck of a nice guy, Spiller has a shot to become a special NFL player. I cannot wait to see him in action for the first time.

35 - Joique Bell. Jeff Winters penned an article about Bell for your reading pleasure. I'm not as bullish on Bell as Jeff is, and think he's the longest of longshots from this group to make the team. He does, however, have practice squad potential, and it's hard not to like his tremendous college production.

Contract Situations
Jackson has three years and $4.9 million remaining on an extension he signed last May. Spiller is likely to get a deal slightly better than the five-year, $22.9 million deal 2009 No. 9 overall pick B.J. Raji signed last year (on August 13). Lynch is technically under contract for three more years, but the final year is voidable; he'll make $2.03 million over the next two seasons. McIntyre is entering the second of a two-year deal he signed last February. Simpson signed an undisclosed contract with the team on May 11, and the details of Ferguson's and Bell's deals are unknown as well.

2010 Forecast
Clearly, the Bills are deep at this position, with the out-of-nowhere Jackson embarking on a surprisingly excellent career complemented by two first-round draft picks. Add in a solid return specialist in Simpson and a lead blocker that might actually be useful in the Bills' new offensive scheme, and the Bills not only have depth, but a great deal of versatility at this position. Buffalo's coaching staff won't take that for granted; these players will absolutely be the focal point of the Bills' offensive scheme in 2010.

My Prediction
Call me crazy, but I think there's a solid chance that five of these players stick on the final roster. That's clearly not a lock, but it's not unprecedented, either; the Bills kept five running backs to start the 2007 regular season. A lot will depend on how young talent develops at tight end and especially wide receiver. It's important to remember that a guy like Spiller can create numbers game illusions, which don't really reflect the depth at the collective offensive skill positions. It's early, but I wouldn't be surprised if Jackson, Lynch, Spiller, Simpson and McIntyre all made the final 53. I think chances are fantastic that four are kept, with Simpson being the odd man out in that scenario. Ferguson or Bell could be practice squad options.

Previous Installments: QB, WR, TE, LT, RT, NT, OLB, ILB, FS, SS

Comment 56 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

I sure hope not we waste a roster spot on pretty much useless Corey McIntyre like Country Club Jauron did last year. He’s never going to be on the field offensively and he’s nothing special on ST’s.

As far as the depth chart goes, I think Jackson and Spiller will split the majority of the carries with Spiller getting more catches and Jackson more runs. Lynch will play a small role, though I could envision him coming on the field late in games to tear down defenses with his physical running style.

"The one commonality in both places (Oakland and Buffalo) is an aging owner who keeps interfering too much. Ralph Wilson continually butts his nose in the football operation and tells the team who to draft"

by BillsfanfromDenmark on May 28, 2010 11:07 AM EDT reply actions  

He’s never going to be on the field offensively

That was kind of my point – you can’t possibly make that claim, because we have no idea what Gailey’s plans are offensively. McIntyre is the only true lead blocker on the roster.

Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott

by Brian Galliford on May 28, 2010 11:08 AM EDT up reply actions  

Call me crazy

I don’t think it’s crazy at all. Furthermore, under Gailey, I can imagine seeing Jackson, Lynch (or McIntyre) and Spiller on the field at the same time with Spiller as the slot receiver. Crazy, but, imaginable.

The future ain't what it used to be - Yogi Berra

by fansince60 on May 28, 2010 11:17 AM EDT up reply actions  

just wondering

does Ferguson have any chance of challenging for the FB roll? Does he have any expeirence there? He seems so big for a RB.

by jbbillfan on May 28, 2010 11:28 AM EDT up reply actions  

Ferguson’s far more finesses than physical. No, he’s a runner through and through.

Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott

by Brian Galliford on May 28, 2010 12:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

To me, keeping McIntyre on the roster is a useless investment. Might as well keep four TE’s or six WR’s instead

"The one commonality in both places (Oakland and Buffalo) is an aging owner who keeps interfering too much. Ralph Wilson continually butts his nose in the football operation and tells the team who to draft"

by BillsfanfromDenmark on May 28, 2010 1:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

If that fourth tight end (probably not that sixth WR) can help us on special teams, I’m all for it – provided Gailey’s not going to use a lead blocker.

Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott

by Brian Galliford on May 28, 2010 1:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

We like last years RB's

Jackson, Spiller, Lynch is solid

"Hold ya chin up...nuh nuh nuh...gone" -Marshawn Lynch-

by billsoferie on May 28, 2010 11:15 AM EDT reply actions  

Fred jackson "and I hope he is here for a long time"

I know he is young in NFL years, and he seems to have fresh legs so how long do you invision him being able to produce at a top level considering his age?
I agree with your desire to keep him here I love him as a player, leader, and person. Is it unrealistic to think we could get six more years out of him?

by jbbillfan on May 28, 2010 11:46 AM EDT reply actions  

Chad Simpson? Dont think so

Im sorry, but Chad Simpson was just brought in for competition purposes to push the other running backs, I dont think there is any chance he is on the opening day roster, I give Bell a better shot than him easily. Simpson was not a very good returner for the Colts, nowhere near as good as Mckelvin or Spiller, and Parrish for punts. He was not a very good runningback either. Just because he has a little bit of game experience doesnt put him ahead of anyone because he hasnt been productive besides one kick return TD. That will not be enough to get him a roster spot.

by Gesome77 on May 28, 2010 11:48 AM EDT reply actions  

Just because he has a little bit of game experience doesnt put him ahead of anyone

Actually, it does. It puts him ahead of Ferguson and Bell. He’s #4 in the pecking order.

Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott

by Brian Galliford on May 28, 2010 12:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

Even if Lynch were in town, he’s still a decided third in the RB pecking order

I’m not convinced of that. He’s probably in that spot NOW, but he didn’t have to be with a new coaching staff on board.

My sense is that Spiller’s going to be at best, a part time player at RB, and probably more on passing downs. That leaves a spot open for Lynch or Jackson (which could very well be the starter’s spot).

Last year Lynch put on weight and I think that hindered him as he didn’t have the speed he used to (which is also a lesson not to buy into certain training camp hype). He also danced around in the backfield instead of just plowing it up in there every carry. Jackson was clearly the better player. But with a new coaching staff I’d think they’d have a clean slate, and Lynch could very well be a better option than Jackson if he got into ideal shape and ran better. The talent is there, but it appears that the dedication and desire are lacking to count on him.

I’d be very surprised if the Bills go with 5 RBs. I think it’ll be 4, unless they don’t keep a FB and then it might be 3. There’s no point in keeping a RB on the roster if you don’t have faith in them (Omon). Just have one on the practice squad ready to go (like Bell).

by Pistol on May 28, 2010 11:56 AM EDT reply actions  

I’m not convinced of that

Neither am I. I’m also not convinced that

he’ll be gone either next off-season or when his rookie deal expires. Lynch isn’t part of the future at this position anymore

I love Fred Jackson and really, who doesn’t? But hes had one breakout year and some good, solid ones. He still only scored 2 TDs in a full time role last year. Marshawn is younger, more athletic, and a bigger scoring threat. Of course, he’s also dumber, less coachable, and less mature. I think banking on Fred Jackson to be productive for more than two more seasons is being a bit optimistic. He’ll be 32 by then and while he hasn’t had wear and tear he also hasn’t been exposed to as much injury risk and at the end of the day a 30 year old body can only take so many hits from enormous 20 year olds before it inevitably starts to falter. Its what makes Brett Favre so loved, he defies that seemingly absolute law of football.

I can see a scenario in which Gailey builds an offense around Fred Jackson and utilizing Marshawn Lynch to keep Jackson fresh and productive late in games and in the season. Spiller takes the role of a running backs Percy Harvin, two back sets, reverses, in the slot, tosses, etc. etc. When Jackson hits the wall in a few seasons, slide Marshawn into his role.

I can see Jackson getting 40% of the RB touches, with Lynch and Spiller hitting around 30% each. Use the three headed monster and get great results. It could be an offensive identity. Last I checked we didnt draft a QB. I think he’ll use them all quite evenly.

"I may be drunk, Miss, but in the morning I will be sober and you will still be ugly"

by poz on May 28, 2010 12:52 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

agreed – rec’d

definately like Fred Jackson – but he’s not a TD machine, is getting older and we have youth at the position…..

We got the tools, We got the talent

by J2 on May 28, 2010 12:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

Fred Jackson is 29 years old. He’s not an every-down back, and his game isn’t based around speed. Backs tail off quickly if they’re speed backs; backs like Jackson can play a while. Barring catastrophic injury, we’ll get at least three more high-quality seasons out of Jackson.

Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott

by Brian Galliford on May 28, 2010 1:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree and, like you, I enjoy him more than nearly any player in team history.

Jackson’s wear is very minmal. I saw an article recently that showed his carries vs LT’s at age 29. I don’t know how accurately one can form a conclusion though, if the article didn’t take into account his non-NFL carries.

Still, he’s far from done, and that’s great news for the team and for us as fans. He reminds me of Steve Tasker, in terms of on-field ability.

Buffalo Rumblings Premiere League 2009 Champion
Song recommendation of the week: Pearl Jam - Faithful
Tom: "Is that bacon wrapped around your turkey leg?"
Ron: "They call it the Swanson."

by TheAfghanTwilight on May 28, 2010 1:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

I totally agree. He’ll play this entire season at age 29 which is only a year older than Michael Turner and Ronnie Brown. I think Jackson has at least two more seasons in him before we start to see an age or wear and tear related decline.

SFC: Were you excited about Clausen dropping to the Bills pick? Or did you have a feeling that the Bills wouldn’t pick him anyway?
Galliford: Both, like when that hot chick waves at someone she knows standing behind you.

by kaisertown on May 28, 2010 6:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

Disagree with some of what you said

Who loves Favre so much?

I can see Jackson getting 40% of the RB touches, with Lynch and Spiller hitting around 30% each.

Last year the Bills’ RB’s ran the ball 362 times (Jackson 237, Lynch 120, McIntyre 5), and I really can’t envision that number getting that much higher. Let’s be kind and say they’ll average 25 rushes a game, for 400 total, which might be generous. Could you really see Jackson only getting 10 carries a game? I think Freddie gets 60-70% of the carries, with Spiller around 20-25% and Lynch whatever is left over.

Jackson should see 14-16 carries a game, at least, Spiller should get 7-10 or so, and Lynch can get 3-5 and maybe some goal line work. That gives the Bills a strong two-headed monster in Jackson and Spiller, just the way it should be. With a poor OL once again, they need to go with the runners who can make things happen when the blocking breaks down. Jackson has proven he can get the job done in this scenario, and Spiller’s speed should give him plenty of chances to do the same. Lynch has never proven he can be that type of player. He’s someone who needs the blocking to give him a lane where he can battle through LB’s and DB’s.

If the offense is built around Jackson with Lynch being brought in to keep Jackson fresh, then how exactly is Lynch getting a similar number of carries???

How often do teams utilize 3 RB’s consistently and throughout multiple games?

I think Jackson will get a similar number of total carries as last year, Spiller will get roughly the number Lynch had last year, and Lynch will get carries if either is injured or if there are a few more to go around. I just don’t see this offense utilizing all three.

~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."

by Kurupt on May 28, 2010 2:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

in regards to the percentages I was referring to “RB touches” as I noted in my original post. I wasn’t clear with how I saw that relating to Spiller but I was thinking he is going to be utilized a bit more like Percy Harvin than we may think. With Lynch and Jackson already on the team I’m speculating that Spiller will be used in a ton of packages as a receiving option considering we dont have any reliable threat other than Lee Evans to catch balls. So if Spiller is catching the ball, I counted that in my analysis of touches – basically imagining Lynch and Jackson doing a lot of the heavy running with Spiller being moved all over the place.

In regards to your rushing total from last year, I think we will run the ball more than last year. Last year we had TO and Lee Evans to get the ball to and though we didnt take to the air by any stretch, isnt Gailey a conservative playcaller? I think he’ll get ultra conservative if Trent Edwards is starting behind that offensive line and without any reliable receivers. When he does pass, I think Spiller and the running backs will have a large role in that too.

Who doesn’t love Favre, K? You?

"I may be drunk, Miss, but in the morning I will be sober and you will still be ugly"

by poz on May 28, 2010 3:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

Who doesn’t love Favre, K? You?

I used to not care about Brett Favre. ESPN has made me despise the man. I would run him over in my car if I saw him on the street.

Official ledge-talker-offer of the Buffalo Bills.

by WhyBillsWhy on May 28, 2010 4:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

Desmond?!

Buffalo Rumblings Premiere League 2009 Champion
Song recommendation of the week: Pearl Jam - Faithful
Tom: "Is that bacon wrapped around your turkey leg?"
Ron: "They call it the Swanson."

by TheAfghanTwilight on May 28, 2010 4:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

Haha

I wouldn’t go that far, but yeah, see what I mean???

~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."

by Kurupt on May 28, 2010 5:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

OK

Even with that presumption for Spiller, you still have Jackson and Lynch getting similar amounts of touches/carries. I don’t agree with that at all. Jackson last year was better than Lynch has been at any point in his career. Jackson works much better behind a shaky OL than Lynch does, and he’s more versatile overall.

The total carries projection I made of 400 to be split amongst our RB’s is probably a solid, yet somewhat generous, average after taking a look at the top 10-12 rushing teams (by carries) from last year. Most had their main RB’s total over 400 carries between them, but other than maybe New England, none really had a 3rd RB getting more than 50-60 carries. With my belief that Jackson should get the majority of the touches, which I think the coaching staff is going to agree with, and with Spiller probably in line for 100-150 carries, where exactly are carries going to come for Lynch? Why does he even deserve a significant number of carries??

The Bills threw the ball 441 times last year, which was 31st in the NFL. How much more conservative and run oriented can this team get? I don’t see this team really improving offensively until the passing game picks up. We can continue running the ball relatively well, yet it won’t really matter if the passing game is putrid.

And if the RB’s are going to be heavily involved in the passing game, which I do agree with, then wouldn’t Jackson and Spiller be the ones most likely to get those touches too? They are both very good receivers, maybe great for RB’s, while Lynch is a mediocre receiving threat.

I think this staff rides Jackson and Spiller hard. Spiller will get touches a variety of ways, while Jackson is the “workhorse” inside. I don’t see what Lynch can provide that Freddie can’t do, and Freddie does most things better than Lynch does.

I hate Favre, and I’m sure numerous other Rumblers feel the same way. I’ve never actually met a Favre fan. I have a friends, who’s a Jets fan and owns a Favre jersey, and even he doesn’t like him. I’d love for someone to take a poll about feelings towards Favre.

~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."

by Kurupt on May 28, 2010 5:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

The bills threw the ball 441 times last year, wich was 31st in the NFL. How much more conservative and run oriented can this team get?

While there is no disputing DJ was ultra conservative I think this stat is more a reflection of the Bills inability to move the chains than anything else. I see this as the biggest problem that Gailey can fix this year. This would help to get the run attempts up.

by jbbillfan on May 29, 2010 1:21 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, but it's not like we can throw any less than we did....

And this offense is still going to struggle to move the chains with a poor OL and no QB….

~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."

by Kurupt on May 29, 2010 11:32 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think we might pass more times than last year

by the #’s but as a percentage it could be we pass less this year. Obviously pass is going to be our weakness, and rushing is going to be our strength. IMO if Gailey can just improve our execution (less penaltys) giving us less 3rd and longs, and pound the run game with just enough pass to keep the def. honest we should move the sticks a lot better. I dont have the stats to prove this, but just converting five first downs a game more than last year would have given us 72 more passes, and 168 more rushes ( if we rush 70%, and pass 30% of those extra plays a game) So if we add those to your numbers of 362 rushes, and 441 passes this would give us 530 rushes, and 513 passes. I know there is a lot of subjection in those numbers, and realisticly I would expect them to look more like 560 rushes, and 470 passes. I know 560 sounds like a lot, but these are stats that swing wildlly from year to year and with just small improvements like less 3rd and long, less injuries, less offensive penalties, more creative offensive system, more C J Spiller, and a little more luck things could change quite a lot from last year. Even with a poor OL (improving cant be worse than last year), and poor QB.

by jbbillfan on May 30, 2010 12:51 AM EDT up reply actions  

Lynch could very well be a better option than Jackson if he got into ideal shape and ran better

I don’t agree with that. We’ve seen Lynch for three years now and we’ve seen him behind a pretty stable and not terrible OL in 2007 and 2008 and we’ve seen him get fairly decent QB play in 2008 and he was still never as good as Jackson was last year.

SFC: Were you excited about Clausen dropping to the Bills pick? Or did you have a feeling that the Bills wouldn’t pick him anyway?
Galliford: Both, like when that hot chick waves at someone she knows standing behind you.

by kaisertown on May 28, 2010 6:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

The three-headed Monster

If Lynch gets back in shape physically and mentally, we will have one of the scariest backfields in the NFL. If Lynch and Freddie are in the backfield and Spiller in the slot (or Freddie in the slot and Spiller in the backfield) that will be a nightmare to defend. I like it!!

If our O-Line gels it could be an awesome offense. As long as we have a QB that can play……..

Love those Bills but we're tired of losing......

by coolness1 on May 28, 2010 12:36 PM EDT reply actions  

If our O-Line gels it could be an awesome offense. As long as we have a QB that can play……..

We should cure cancer while we’re at it.

Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott

by Brian Galliford on May 28, 2010 12:38 PM EDT up reply actions   3 recs

REC!!

Love those Bills but we're tired of losing......

by coolness1 on May 28, 2010 2:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

Some might argue that Lynch is scary enough, without getting back into “shape.” He needs to hire a professional photographer.

Buffalo Rumblings Premiere League 2009 Champion
Song recommendation of the week: Pearl Jam - Faithful
Tom: "Is that bacon wrapped around your turkey leg?"
Ron: "They call it the Swanson."

by TheAfghanTwilight on May 28, 2010 1:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

There’s a lot to that. But in the end the problem with Marshawn is that he can’t see holes open up and doesn’t explode through them fast enough. Maybe Gailey and the rest of the offensive coaching staff can cure that defect, but one has to assume that past coaches have tried to fix it and so far no luck. Until Marshawn solves this he is going to continue to perform well beneath his potential.

by Macktruck on May 28, 2010 1:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

He needs to hire a professional photographer.

or a plastic surgeon

The future ain't what it used to be - Yogi Berra

by fansince60 on May 28, 2010 4:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

Nah, it’s that hair and teeth thing. He looks bad in underlit locales. It’s like that episode of Seinfeld.

Buffalo Rumblings Premiere League 2009 Champion
Song recommendation of the week: Pearl Jam - Faithful
Tom: "Is that bacon wrapped around your turkey leg?"
Ron: "They call it the Swanson."

by TheAfghanTwilight on May 28, 2010 4:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

Spiller:

isn’t it refreshing seeing a top pick on the field for Buffalo, learning the NFL before he even signs a contract?

Buffalo Rumblings Premiere League 2009 Champion
Song recommendation of the week: Pearl Jam - Faithful
Tom: "Is that bacon wrapped around your turkey leg?"
Ron: "They call it the Swanson."

by TheAfghanTwilight on May 28, 2010 1:12 PM EDT reply actions  

Yea,

Maybin could have used that last year, he held out for a while.

Not the only cause of his poor season but it did not help.

"Hold ya chin up...nuh nuh nuh...gone" -Marshawn Lynch-

by billsoferie on May 28, 2010 1:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

Maybin was here for OTAs last year.

Learning the NFL before he even signed a contract. There’s no promise that Spiller doesn’t hold out come this year’s camp.

by twoeightnine on May 28, 2010 1:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hooray, simultaneous posting!

Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott

by Brian Galliford on May 28, 2010 1:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yes, I forgot about this until I hit “post.”

Buffalo Rumblings Premiere League 2009 Champion
Song recommendation of the week: Pearl Jam - Faithful
Tom: "Is that bacon wrapped around your turkey leg?"
Ron: "They call it the Swanson."

by TheAfghanTwilight on May 28, 2010 4:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

o right

just when camp started, my bad

I just remember wishing he was there

"Hold ya chin up...nuh nuh nuh...gone" -Marshawn Lynch-

by billsoferie on May 29, 2010 11:52 AM EDT up reply actions  

Maybin was around at this time last year, as well. Talk to me when training camp rolls around and the contact practices start.

Buffalo Rumblings. On Twitter.
"You miss 100% of the shots you don't take. --Wayne Grezky" --Michael Scott

by Brian Galliford on May 28, 2010 1:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Amen brother.....

Love those Bills but we're tired of losing......

by coolness1 on May 28, 2010 2:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

State of the Bills RB situation:

Excessive.

"Godzilla is coming so get ready." -abayarde

by Port Royal on May 28, 2010 1:22 PM EDT reply actions  

continued....

Excessively awesome

We got the tools, We got the talent

by J2 on May 28, 2010 2:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

Awesome

Yeah, I fully expect Spiller and Jackson (and maybe even Lynch) to be some of my favorite players on a 4-win team that struggles mightily to score points. Awesomeness secured.

"Godzilla is coming so get ready." -abayarde

by Port Royal on May 28, 2010 3:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Are we sure of this???
Lynch isn’t part of the future at this position anymore, but he’s more useful as a third back than he is as a future mid-round draft pick.

If Lynch is the 3rd RB all year, gets roughly 3-5 carries a game, and loses all trade value, how exactly is that more useful than a mid round pick?? I think if Lynch is still around come September, it’ll be his least season in Buffalo. I don’t envision much of a role for him either, so it would appear a pick would seem more useful…..

~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."

by Kurupt on May 28, 2010 2:48 PM EDT reply actions  

I agree with this. Nix & co showed that they can do a pretty decent job (allegedly) making picks in the late round…so even if all we can get for him now are a few late round picks, or a mid rounder, why not make the most of it?

by quantumuprising on May 28, 2010 3:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

If Lynch is phased out this season, the only thing they may accomplish is ruining his shot at a big contract. He will get them nothing, i’d imagine.

Buffalo Rumblings Premiere League 2009 Champion
Song recommendation of the week: Pearl Jam - Faithful
Tom: "Is that bacon wrapped around your turkey leg?"
Ron: "They call it the Swanson."

by TheAfghanTwilight on May 28, 2010 4:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well what if Fred Jackson gets hurt and the only guys we have on the roster are Simpson and Spiller? Running back is a physically demanding position. At some point, Jackson will need someone to step up behind him. A mid-round pick gets you a marginally talented player in return. I am OK with them keeping Lynch around.

You can't have CHANGE without CHAN.
Tweet
Buffalo Rumblings

by MattRichWarren on May 30, 2010 9:17 AM EDT up reply actions  

White cut!!

I see Lendale White just was released in Seattle. Maybe the trade talk could start up with Seattle again for Lynch?

by mjflair on May 28, 2010 5:24 PM EDT reply actions  

makes sense to do the deal now

trade lynch to seattle, get a pick or two, use the bundle to get an ot with an extra carrot thrown in….

somehow it seems the more likely scenario is the norleans tackle….

we need depth at left tackle….got to make a trade here before long….

also, with lynch not seeing much field time in buffalo, is it worth it to keep
his contract on the team???

really need to think about how much is being spent at running back
cj spiller seems like a young superstud, but as a 9 pick he will be
expensive, more so than lynch at 12 4 yrs ago…

seems like lynch knows he is on the trading bloc, and bills know they
have to address the ot position…

by simonpure on May 28, 2010 6:29 PM EDT reply actions  

if shobel retires

that much more space-cash to go get a long term expensive left tackle deal done….

by simonpure on May 28, 2010 6:31 PM EDT reply actions  

Lynch trade?

With LenDale White cut in Seattle could it be that Lynch to hawks is coming???

In order to get somewhere, you first must leave.
You can never have too much moderation

by Moxicity on May 28, 2010 8:55 PM EDT reply actions  

thats a good looking group

"If we can put four quarters together, that's the objective. Let's see how somebody else feels playing from behind." (TWCS)

by norcaliangelsfan on May 28, 2010 9:46 PM EDT reply actions  

CJ Spiller is so fast...

he makes Fred Jackson look like a goal post. (OK I’m done.)

by Moose68 on May 29, 2010 8:57 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

SB Nation's home for all things Buffalo Bills.
Community Guidelines :: Essential BR

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Bills_small
An Exploration of Ryan Fitzpatrick's TDs and INTs
Small
Beyond the Perfect Offseason: Where Do We Go From Here?
Dsc00843_small
NFL Divisional Record And Playoff Berth Correlation, 2002-2011
Wallpaper-443169_small
Wacky Waving Inflatable Arm Flailing Tube Men

Recent FanPosts

Bruuuuce_small
Ranking All 32 NFL Starting QB's : Who is ELITE?
Snapshot_20120113_small
Next Stop: 3rd Generation of Winners
Fred_jackson_small
The 2012 (way to early) Fitz projection thread
Bruuuuce_small
The Fitzpatrick Extension: Was It The Right Move.....For The Future?
Snapshot_20120113_small
Thoughts of multiple fans in one head
Small
Kellen Winslow Jr.
Small
Dwayne Bowe
Picture_2_small
Revenge is sweet

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Screen_shot_2012-03-07_at_6 Brian Galliford

100_2488_small MattRichWarren

Authors

Range_march_2011_small Ron From NM

Slide1_small Der Jaeger

Moderators

Sucks_small Kurupt

Mrsinister03_small sireric

Cordy_small poz