Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Hugh Douglas Admits To Stealing From Jaguars

Bills Defense Stays Vanilla In Pre-Season Opener

Pre-season football is notorious for a few things. Incredibly bland game plans is one of them. Pre-season football is boring football, not because there isn't anything to be learned, but because teams are keeping their schemes very close to the vest so as not to tip their hand when the games start counting.

Therefore, it's hardly surprising that the first-team defense of the Buffalo Bills was about as predictable as you can get during Saturday night's 42-17 loss to the Washington Redskins.

The first unit wound up playing three series - 23 reps' worth of playing time - and giving up two touchdowns through a little over a quarter of the game. 20 different players saw action with the unit, as a long scoring drive in the first quarter led to some substitutions, and sub-packages brought in depth players for early reps.

After the jump, we'll break down the two main alignments the Bills used on Friday night, make a few scheme and player notes, and talk about some of the other wrinkles we saw very early in the 2010 season. This will give us a base look at George Edwards' new 3-4 defense, and how the Bills might build upon it as the season (pre and regular) progresses.

Star-divide

The Two Main Alignments
Of the first unit's 23 snaps, 21 came out of the following two alignments.

34 Base - As you might expect, this is Buffalo's base defensive alignment. Three down linemen, two inside linebackers, two outside linebackers, two safeties and two corners. Buffalo used this alignment 13 times with the first unit last night, and it should definitely be noted that the scheme was never once utilized on third down - only early downs. The Bills only technically gave up 98 yards (penalty yardage notwithstanding), and this alignment was dependable, as the Bills didn't give up more than six yards on any given play. Then again, Washington only threw against this defense on four of the 13 snaps.

43 Nickel - When Buffalo went to a nickel defense, they did so out of the 4-3 alignment, which again, isn't unexpected. On four of the eight snaps out of this alignment, both of Buffalo's outside linebackers lined up out of a two-point stance at defensive end, with one down lineman coming off the field and strong safety Bryan Scott subbing in for one of the inside linebackers (usually Andra Davis). On the other half of those snaps, one of the two outside 'backers would play defensive end, and all three defensive linemen would stay on the field (Dwan Edwards playing the other end position), with the same back seven. The delineation: the two-OLB-at-DE look was used on third downs, while the look that included Edwards at DE was used on first and second downs. Washington scored both of its touchdowns against the 43 Nickel alignment.

Very Few Wrinkles
Buffalo broke out two extra alignments for one snap each. They used a 43 Dime on an early third down, with Reggie Corner the dime back. They allowed a first down on that play. They also used a 44 look - four down linemen, four linebackers - on a third and one, with Torell Troup lining up between the three starting defensive linemen on that snap. They also allowed a first down on that play on a nice scramble by Donovan McNabb.

In terms of blitz packages, there was essentially nothing. Donte Whitner had a nicely-timed blitz that McNabb exploited for Washington's first score. Otherwise, it was your basic approach - four rushers, basic coverages behind them.

I anticipated that Buffalo would flip its linebackers based on the strength of the offensive alignment, but while the inside linebackers did this on occasion, the outside 'backers did not. More often than not, players listed as strong-side linebackers (most often Chris Ellis, who played quite a bit) were lined up on the weak side of the alignment. I have no idea if George Edwards plans to flip his linebackers once the regular season begins, but that was certainly not the plan last night.

The first-unit defense's performance was a mixed bag. Washington did pretty much whatever they wanted on a 72-yard scoring drive, their second drive of the game. The base defense looked far more advanced than the nickel package. The pass-rush was incredibly hit-or-miss, though the Redskins weren't waiting on a lot of complex routes to develop. Coverages were basic and reads were made slowly; it was clear that Buffalo was doing a lot of thinking out of its new alignment. A roughing penalty on Aaron Maybin and an illegal contact penalty on Davis nullified third-down stops on both of Washington's touchdown drives. Then again, the unit only gave up 98 yards (penalty yardage notwithstanding), and the Redskins were set up on the 12-yard line for their second score after a Trent Edwards interception. The defense looked pretty average, but trust me, folks - average isn't a bad place to start.

Player Reps
Before one of you adds up the reps below and says "hey, you're missing one!" - I know. In taking notes on the first team, I forgot to tally a rep for one of the players below. I have neither the patience nor the stomach to rewind my way back to find that one rep, and this list will give you a general enough idea on who played where and how often to be getting on with.

# reps Player Position(s)
23 D. Whitner SS, 44 FS
23 D. Florence CB, Nickel CB
22 K. Williams NT, DT
22 T. McGee CB
22 J. Byrd FS
21 D. Edwards DE, DT
20 M. Stroud DE, DT
19 C. Ellis SLB, DE
18 K. Mitchell WLB
15 A. Davis MLB
14 R. Torbor JLB
9 L. McKelvin CB
8 B. Scott Nickel LB
4 A. Maybin JLB, DE
4 A. Coleman JLB, SLB, DE
3 A. Moats WLB
2 T. Troup NT, DT
1 A. Carrington 34 DE
1 R. Corner Dime CB
1 G. Wilson 44 SS

Comment 31 comments  |  1 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Awesome analysis.

You can't have CHANGE without CHAN.
Tweet
Buffalo Rumblings

by MattRichWarren on Aug 14, 2010 10:55 AM EDT reply actions  

I second that.

Truly awesome work. What it boils down to, I think, is that our pass rush was a major problem area. One thing I noticed was that the DE’s (Stroud, Dwan Edwards and Carrington) were making no effort last night to penetrate and put real pressure on the QB. That was something I saw them do a lot in training camp. I wonder if that is another dimension of the scheme that George Edwards was holding back on, along with the blitz.

by Macktruck on Aug 14, 2010 12:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

The redskins announcers

kept saying the Bills were in the dime package for some odd reason.

This space held in honor of Robert Royal known to his friends as "Sweet Cream Style Corn" March 11 2006- February 26, 2009

by pasaluki on Aug 14, 2010 11:10 AM EDT reply actions  

Likely because Scott is listed as a SS, so technically they did have 6 DBs on the field. But Scott was lined up right next to Kawika on most of the nickel looks; clearly was a LB spot.

by Brian Galliford on Aug 14, 2010 11:14 AM EDT up reply actions  

Just as I hoped when you did your Nickel LB poll. :-)

You can't have CHANGE without CHAN.
Tweet
Buffalo Rumblings

by MattRichWarren on Aug 14, 2010 12:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

I gotta say, I like having Scott on the field as an LB/Safety....

I think the more we can get guys like Wilson, Scott, Whitner, McKelvin, Byrd, etc out there, the better we will be. I love our secondary. If that means less Reggie Torbor, Chris Kelsay, Chris Ellis or even Kavicka Mitchell, that’s fine with me.

"WHEN THE WAGON BLASTER TAKES OFF dont try to get in. THE SPACESES ARE LIMITED FOR WINNING ATTITUDE GODZILLA IS COMING GET READY" - abayarde

by StroudFanClub on Aug 14, 2010 3:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

Good write up, and though I was disappointed (as I am with every Bills loss) there were some things that I liked, and a lot of the mistakes we saw I am hopeful are just due to learning a new system and needing more time. Just the first pre-season game

I was born in Buffalo, and NO, it's not a suburb of New York City

by Ghetts on Aug 14, 2010 11:55 AM EDT reply actions   1 recs

Moats looked completely lost out there. He needs a lot of work

Is this your homework, Larry?

by Schooled You on Aug 14, 2010 11:59 AM EDT via mobile reply actions  

Actually, I thought he started looking better as the game progressed. Then again, as the game progressed he was facing third- and fourth-stringers. He’s a small college kid making the big jump to the pro’s, so I would cut him some slack..

by Macktruck on Aug 14, 2010 12:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

No kidding, man. My wife knows who he is now merely based on me yelling his name five times.

You can't have CHANGE without CHAN.
Tweet
Buffalo Rumblings

by MattRichWarren on Aug 14, 2010 12:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

Wow

I can’t believe you had the stomach to tally all that up. Then again, we’re all used to these types of performances….

I thought Troup would see more time than that, and Williams less obviously. I guess that will take some time.

Maybin needs more first unit snaps. Give him the chance to more than likely sink, or swim. There’s no reason to be playing Torbor so much, other than on early downs.

Did Carrington get seriously hurt?

~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."

by Kurupt on Aug 14, 2010 12:16 PM EDT reply actions  

No

Chan said he’s fine, I think back in a few days, thankfully.

Home of "Spiller the Thriller"

by buffalobacker on Aug 14, 2010 12:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

Maybin needs more first unit snaps.

It just seemed to me that Maybin looked like Gumby out there. Some replays I saw showed him engaging then folding like he was made of clay.
Appeared to me that he had little/no upper body strength and/or poor technique.

I was married by a judge. I should have asked for a jury- Groucho Marx

by fansince60 on Aug 14, 2010 12:41 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Haha

Gumby would be a solid nickname for him. Pokey might be an even better name.

He got tossed around by Trent Wiliams the few times he went up against him, that’s for sure.

~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."

by Kurupt on Aug 14, 2010 12:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

recd
Appeared to me that he had little/no upper body strength and/or poor technique

"We can't run. We can't pass. We can't stop the run. We can't stop the pass. We can't kick. Other than that, we're just not a very good football team right now."
~Bruce Coslet

by Ren Diggity on Aug 14, 2010 1:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

Correct
Maybin needs more first unit snaps.

This is maybe the most important comment about Maybin. The Jack LB plays in a two point stance. Maybin entered the game early on mostly as the RDE in the 4-3 Nickle combination. In that scheme, Maybin rushed almost exclusively out of a 4-point stance, a la Jason Taylor or DeMarcus Ware.

Maybin is not very good out of that stance. He comes out of the stance low and fast, which is good. He gets good leverage against the OT as he begins to close the distance. But his upper body is in front of his feet too much. He’s not a good hand fighter to begin with, and this body position gives him two options: bull rush or speed rush to get an edge on the OT. He bulled Trent Williams to McNabb once very well. Other than that, not much.

Out of a two-point stance, he still comes out fast, but he’s more upright, and has his feet gathered under him. I saw that his hand fighting was much improved, slapping hands down and other techniques to keep blockers hands off him. Because his feet are gathered, he redirects inside much easier and can execute the spin move as well.

The more we see Maybin with the first team, the more we’ll see him in a 2-point stance. And the better he’ll play, methinks.

Starting the official Buffalo "Draft Owen Marecic in 2011" campaign.

by Der Jaeger on Aug 14, 2010 3:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

only thing not mentioned

was the ridiculous amount of 4-3 we played in the 4th, unless that was 4-4 and i was not paying close enough attention. Otherwise, it looked to me like a lot of 4-3 against the run as they ran the clock down, and though it was not our “starters”… we still looked pretty weak IMO. i don’t really get running guys like McCargo as a DT for half the game, instead of keeping with the 3-4, for these younger kids that don’t know the scheme well enough, it would be better to get the reps in a game situation, at least i think.

"We can't run. We can't pass. We can't stop the run. We can't stop the pass. We can't kick. Other than that, we're just not a very good football team right now."
~Bruce Coslet

by Ren Diggity on Aug 14, 2010 12:45 PM EDT reply actions  

unless that was 4-4 and i was not paying close enough attention.

It was hard to pay attention. I don’t think I’ve been that glazed over since Calculus class!

I was married by a judge. I should have asked for a jury- Groucho Marx

by fansince60 on Aug 14, 2010 1:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

yeah

but i just don’t know if they reverted to 4-3 for the younger guys to just get some snaps and not be totally lost, but i just don’t get that. just don’t.

"We can't run. We can't pass. We can't stop the run. We can't stop the pass. We can't kick. Other than that, we're just not a very good football team right now."
~Bruce Coslet

by Ren Diggity on Aug 14, 2010 1:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

They ran a lot of 4-3 looks in the second half because Washington was in 3- and 4-wide a lot, and their nickel/dime packages call for four down linemen.

by Brian Galliford on Aug 14, 2010 3:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

Nice analysis

The Linebackers just seemed so lost in space. I don’t get it. Do the LB’s zone up or man up or hybrid. It just did not look smooth.

I hope certainly hope we all stop this Jauron’s camp v Gailey’s camp. I didn’t see anything more special or more physical about the Bills yesterday. Clearly the mental aspect of the game needs to improve and then they can play faster and harder.

I’m curious about TE has to say about the deep ball overthrown to SJ. Was it that SJ was not fast enough, or that he was rushed. It’s nice to see an overthrown deep ball, but for a team like ours, we can’t afford not to hit on those rare chances.

I think from this analysis we can see the value a Keith Ellison would bring. As a smaller and faster and smart player, he can be worked into a few packages, especially into the obvious passing situations as a Nickel LB.

by Ono on Aug 14, 2010 1:37 PM EDT reply actions  

Looked like scuba steve was going just about full speed on that play to me, Trent just over-threw him.

Is it hockey season yet?
THIS IS BUFFALO NATION GODZILLA HAS AWAKEN - abayarde
Paul McCartney Can't Play Piano
Burgundy Wave: Nobody's favorite Rapids Blog!

by UZ on Aug 14, 2010 2:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

My expectations for this defense have been significantly tempered after that performance. God I hope they have a steep learning curve.

Enjoying my annual three months of optimism.

by Trashplate on Aug 14, 2010 7:05 PM EDT reply actions  

*from this point forward, that is.

Enjoying my annual three months of optimism.

by Trashplate on Aug 14, 2010 7:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

What?

They sure seemed bad. Only thing I can come up with is its pre-season, and when I think of game I keep reminding myself “it’s only the pre-season”. I forget most starters and injured starters didn’t really see many, if any reps. I won’t get into Maybin except to say “wow he’s flexible and bounces of ground well”. It’s only pre-season and the ones didn’t play much so I shouldn’t be overly critical. I hope Brohm magically transforms into a Pro-Bowl type QB overnite. It would be a much needed boost/break. :)

Home of "Spiller the Thriller"

by buffalobacker on Aug 14, 2010 8:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

I tried to make it plain that they were average – not great, not terrible – in this very article. I guess that’s a fail on my part.

by Brian Galliford on Aug 14, 2010 10:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

Thank you for the quality reporting. It really helps all of us become less emotional and more analytical.

by Montel on Aug 16, 2010 8:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

thanks

Just want to say thanks for this. It’s exctly the kind of info I’ve been searching for on the Bills and hadn’t been able to find.

by Tomski on Aug 15, 2010 12:48 PM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

SB Nation's home for all things Buffalo Bills.
Community Guidelines :: Essential BR

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
Finesse Offensive Tackles

Recent FanPosts

Small
The Only Way The Bills Make The Playoffs in 2012
Small
Buffalo Bills Off-season Free Agency Outlook/Additions
Small
My Mock 3.0
3711447533_7d16c40425_o_small
TB1 - Run vs. Pass + a mock
Small
Morning Joe! Buffalo Bills and the Crimson Tides
Thumb-10488_small
Alex Carrington To Get His Mojo?
Small
"IF" we made Fred Jackson available, who would want him and what might we get ?
Truth1_small
What's the Diggity? Part 4
Jasper_in_space_small
A new idea for our CB position
Calvinhobbes_evil_small
Would You.......

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Lead Editors

Img_20110806_213313_small Brian Galliford

100_2488_small MattRichWarren

Senior Moderators

Sucks_small Kurupt

Mrsinister03_small sireric

Contributing Authors

Slide1_small Der Jaeger

Range_march_2011_small Ron From NM

Site Moderators

Santa_bill_small poz

Billsdinosaurrider_small WABillsfan

Avatar31985_4_small silverstreak3k

3850_small JPH

211_talking_proud_1_small krytime