Bills Pass Defense In Line For 2010 Regression
The defense of the Buffalo Bills was a statistical anomaly in 2009. Despite giving up over 340 yards and 20 points per game, as well as having the league's No. 31-ranked run defense, the Bills were the second-best pass defense in the league. Their 184.2 passing yards allowed per game was bested only by Darrelle Revis and the New York Jets, and the team's 28 interceptions were second only to Green Bay's 30.
That type of production is not likely to be repeated by the Bills in 2010 - and they might not even come close to that type of success.
True, the Bills are deep in the secondary. True, the Bills only face three quarterbacks rated in the Top 10 a year ago (Tom Brady twice, four if Brett Favre plays, and still equal to the three they faced a year ago). True, again, that by and large, the Bills will field exactly the same personnel that made up the No. 2-ranked unit a year ago. But even getting healthy players back, a scheme switch to the 3-4 has brought about new responsibilities for players, and the pass defense has been roughed up in the early going.
In Friday night's pre-season opener, Washington Redskins quarterbacks Donovan McNabb, Rex Grossman and John Beck completed 18 of 33 passes for 225 yards, with three touchdowns, no interceptions, and two sacks allowed (John McCargo, Aaron Maybin). Buffalo's cornerbacks and safeties didn't play poorly (with the possible exception of Reggie Corner, who had a rough outing, to say the least), but vulnerabilities were highlighted in the underbelly of Buffalo's defense.
In particular, Buffalo's new 3-4 linebackers have a lot to learn. We knew this going into the season, particularly at the outside linebacker position, where several defensive ends are now trying to stand up and drop back into coverage. The only player that looks remotely comfortable doing that to this point is Reggie Torbor, whose experience as a 3-4 inside linebacker is helping him transition.
Chris Ellis, currently the second-team SLB (but who started against Washington), didn't look lost on the field, but has already displayed vulnerability to speed on the edge of a defense. If he plays frequently this year, look for teams to test him with speed to the outside. Antonio Coleman, an undrafted rookie free agent from Auburn, has the required athleticism for the position, but is learning entirely new techniques, and was late filling passing lanes on several occasions in D.C., leading to lengthy Redskins completions.
But it doesn't stop at outside linebacker. Arthur Moats, a defensive end at James Madison making the switch to WLB, was torched on several occasions against Washington, reading and reacting to the plays in front of him at a much slower rate than his teammates. Like most of the linebackers learning new responsibilities, Moats did not look instinctive, and far too often appeared to be doing more thinking than playing football. Moats hustles, and as WGR 550's Joe Buscaglia points out, he's something of a playmaker, frequently forcing fumbles during practices and against the Redskins. But he's got a long, long way to go.
This week, we're likely going to see players such as Chris Kelsay, Paul Posluszny and Keith Ellison get their first exposure to their new coverage responsibilities. Kelsay's progress will be particularly intriguing, as he was generally viewed as the biggest passing-game liability in a group full of liabilities at outside linebacker. Posluszny and Ellison are fairly efficient coverage linebackers, which they'll need to be, considering neither Andra Davis nor Kawika Mitchell are proficient in this area.
As we discussed over the weekend, safety Bryan Scott is already playing a linebacker's coverage role in nickel and dime formations. In a defensive scheme that prides itself on being multiple and unpredictable with its pressure packages, having Scott on the field too often in that role is akin to having a seriously obvious tell playing poker. Posluszny and Ellison could take some of those reps away from Scott now that they've returned to the lineup, though it remains to be seen if they'll be more reliable in that capacity.
Buffalo's pass rush is a work in progress, to be very kind. The team has good depth at cornerback, but does not feature a single shut-down-caliber player at the position. Coordinator George Edwards will continue to employ a lot of zone looks, which will put pressure on Buffalo's linebackers - learning new responsibilities - to make efficient drops and read the offense very well. Taking all of that into consideration, it's incredibly unlikely that Buffalo will field anywhere near the second-best pass defense in 2010. Let's just hope it doesn't get so bad that it offsets any gains the team makes in its supposedly-improved run defense.
44 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
But they were #2 last year!
And we have so much talent in the defensive backfield!!
As I’ve said many times, I’d be shocked if this unit was anywhere near as effective and productive as they were a year ago. It’s just not replicable with the talent we have, the lack of pass rushers and not getting to face as many terrible QB’s as last year.
It’s a matter of time before teams really take advantage of our OLB’s. Peyton Manning will likely exploit the crap out of Kelsay, Ellis, Maybin and whoever with Dallas Clark and his other slot options. If our OLB’s are forced to cover, bad things will happen.
Hopefully, we can get another good year out of Byrd and Wilson, with improved play from Whitner, McGee and McKelvin. Our best hope of not having a drastic regression is if some of our players again outproduce what their talents and environment would indicate.
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
And we have so much talent in the defensive backfield!!
Do you really not think we have talent back there, or is that another shot at Reggie Corner (haha(?
No we dont have Revis : Sharper : Reed : Bailey back there… but I would say we definitely have talent.
THIS is our year.
There's talent there
But it’s not elite talent. It’s a group of solid players that played over it’s head last year.
There have been numerous Bills fans talking about these guys as a top 3 or 5 group, which I definitely don’t agree with.
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
Yes I would
I think it’s a middle of the pack unit, which isn’t a bad thing.
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
No its not bad… but I guess I would be disappointed if we didnt end up at the #10 pass D. And that might even be because of our lack of run D. Which wouldnt be a good thing… but I expect our pass D to be more aggressive this year. And with a healthy McKelvin (still has to prove it) but I think him back will help.
THIS is our year.
ton Manning will likely exploit the crap out of Kelsay, Ellis, Maybin and whoever with Dallas Clark and his other slot options
right now – my bet is 6 plays until Peyton scores
I'm not sure we have the tools or the talent....
by J2 on Aug 17, 2010 1:56 PM EDT up reply actions
9
he wants to eat up clock too so he can get home
"We can't run. We can't pass. We can't stop the run. We can't stop the pass. We can't kick. Other than that, we're just not a very good football team right now."
~Bruce Coslet
2. Only because the first play will be a run.
"Give back some of that money you ain't [expletive] earned!" - Eric Wood
Song recommendation of the week: Kool & The Gang - Summer Madness
by TheAfghanTwilight on Aug 17, 2010 2:20 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I was waiting for this post.
Should actually be surprised? Isn’t it true that most of the defensive backfield was drafted with the cover-2 in mind?
"Give back some of that money you ain't [expletive] earned!" - Eric Wood
Song recommendation of the week: Kool & The Gang - Summer Madness
by TheAfghanTwilight on Aug 17, 2010 1:12 PM EDT reply actions
It seemed to me,
though I didn’t do extensive film study, that the Bills were running a lot of cover 2. I really didn’t see either safety playing man to man, or coming down in the box too often. I’m not sure how much their coverage scheme has changed.
Also, some cover 3.
But they didn’t seem to be playing too much press, which is why those short routes always seemed open.
I just realized that I should have specified, “On Saturday.”
These comments are about the Washington game.
Gotcha. Also, it’s not so much that Brian was laying this on their shoulders, as it was on the LBers. That’s quite obviously going to be a major concern until they prove it isn’t one.
"Give back some of that money you ain't [expletive] earned!" - Eric Wood
Song recommendation of the week: Kool & The Gang - Summer Madness
by TheAfghanTwilight on Aug 17, 2010 1:32 PM EDT up reply actions
Well ending up as the #2 pass D, chances are we will be going down. And not many teams threw against us last year… why would they when they could get 7 yards a carry on the ground?
I dont expect us to be top 2 again, but top 10 I could see. We’re still a talented bunch in the defensive backfield… the pass rush will be the key to where we fall.
THIS is our year.
Come ON Guys
This is preseason. Must be nice that fans know alot more about Buffalo’s Defense than the coaching staff
Who said we know anything more about the defense than the coaching staff?
by Brian Galliford on Aug 17, 2010 1:42 PM EDT up reply actions
i read it as sarcasm
as in, how convenient that fans know more than coaches. which i can only assume was said in gest.
you may be right, Winnie, but the fact is, that this is a blog/post/press/fan site, and you are likely to read analysis of players, teams and coaches, from…. well to be nice, NON professionals. We don’t need to know more, to have an opinion.
That said, it doesn’t seem impossible to me that the pass Defense could be worse; statistically speaking, there is a far better chance of being worst than 2nd, then there is to be better than 2nd.
If you were to couple that with a scheme change, and new DC, you are likely to see SOME sort of change, and as i already mentioned, there is far less chance of improvement, or even stasis, than there is for decline.
Personally, i don’t care if we fall to 15th in pass defense, so long as we make it into the top 15 in run stopping as well.
"We can't run. We can't pass. We can't stop the run. We can't stop the pass. We can't kick. Other than that, we're just not a very good football team right now."
~Bruce Coslet
Last year? Yes… yes you did Brian. haha. I would have trusted your familiarity with our players more than Jauron and Co.
THIS is our year.
I’m not sure of a lot of things, but one thing I AM sure of is that I’ve never claimed to be more knowledgeable than any single current or former coach of the Buffalo Bills.
by Brian Galliford on Aug 17, 2010 2:08 PM EDT up reply actions
What about Turk Schonert!?!
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Aug 17, 2010 2:09 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
No I wasnt implying that you have in the past. Im saying I think you knew more last year than our coaching staff.
THIS is our year.
Oh – well let me assure you that’s not true.
by Brian Galliford on Aug 17, 2010 2:42 PM EDT up reply actions
I'm not all that concerned.
Because I think that the 3-4 will mean a net gain for the defense this year. Say we drop to 10th against the pass, but improve to 18th against the run. I’ll take it any day, if for no other reason than shorter drives for the opposing offense, and subsequently a fresher D in the 4th quarter.
In the next 2-3 years, as we improve our 3-4 linebacking core, our secondary will still be in its prime. I could see us being back in the top 5 in passing defense by 2012 and being in the top 1/3 in run defense.
Obviously, all speculation. I’m just saying I’m more optimistic than not about our future D.
haha
my sentiments exactly. thats funny. like, “in stereo” basically. whatever the blog equivalent to that is. ; )
"We can't run. We can't pass. We can't stop the run. We can't stop the pass. We can't kick. Other than that, we're just not a very good football team right now."
~Bruce Coslet
Concur.
I was just thinking the same thing. Drop to 12 or 15 in the passing department wouldn’t be so bad if we’re talking about moving up to 15 or 18 in the run defense department. Net gain I’d say.
One we get a bit more proficient on stopping the run game, opposing teams will have to put it in the air more often. Put it in the air more often, and you get shorter series, defenses stay fresh longer, and you get more chances for that big game-changing pick-off to happen.
I don't care where we ranked in Pass Defense because all it means is that...
our run defense was terrible and teams ran on us more than passed on us… So if this year they pass more on us, it might mean that our front seven is doing their jobs on running downs, forcing more passing.
I DO CARE ABOUT WHERE WE RANK IN OVERALL DEFENSE… Now that is more telling of a great defense. The Jets used it to get to the AFC Title game with a rookie QB and a very good OL and running game last year.
#2 is a joke
Teams never had to pass on us….they could run for 5 yards a clip. We will slip back to somewhere in the middle of the pack (hopefully only that far).
by Posluszny Pollocks on Aug 17, 2010 2:18 PM EDT reply actions
That's not really true though
Teams threw the ball 519 times against the Bills last year, 20th most in the league. Sure, that’s not a ton, but it’s not that teams “never had to pass on us”. Obviously, the porous run D certainly helped keep that number somewhat low, but our secondary also played very, very well last year. They played above their talents and abilities, and that’s the reason I feel we’ll see the regression….
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
I have to ask.....
1- When you say say pass defense, do you mean total pass defense or just the secondary?
2- If you mean total pass defense, what’s your opinion on the secondary for 2010? Will they regress as well?because other than the inexperienced LB’s in thew scheme I really can’t see all that much regression, as you put it.
Can we trade Corner to the Lions for a 7th rounder already???
"Pressure is when you don't prepare, and I know I've prepared myself..."
-C.J. Spiller
Yes please!
"Adversity is an opportunity for heroism." Marv Levy.
by SERGEANT MAJOR THOR on Aug 17, 2010 8:22 PM EDT up reply actions
The pass defense numbers will regress if...
we change the mentality of a bend but don’t break defense. If the Bills intend to be more aggressive defensively, which seems to be the indication, then there will be fewer zone coverages, fewer open windows, and fewer opportunities to take advantage of mistakes in the passing game. How many of Byrd’s interceptions were on passes that would have been big gainers had they been remotely on target? The 3-4 has very little to do with it, except that our OLBs will be exploited early and often, but they were already. Does nobody remember how badly the Bills OLBs were torched by TEs in the seam last season?
I should write a post on why I totally disagree with this article and the rationale behind it, but it would be too long.
No article is “too long” if you write it in chunks with subheadings. :)
by Brian Galliford on Aug 17, 2010 8:23 PM EDT up reply actions
Tease
You can’t make a comment like that and then not write it out!!!
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Aug 17, 2010 11:04 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
But you won’t. I don’t see how anyone could make a cogent argument against the thesis of the article.
You can't have CHANGE without CHAN.
Tweet
Buffalo Rumblings
by MattRichWarren on Aug 19, 2010 3:27 PM EDT up reply actions
Well, actually I’m a med student here in Philly & work so my time is very limited. Plus, I wanted to do a little research before I made any comment, to back up my opinion.
i will bring up some things on my mind….
1) yes they may have anyone elite, but as a unit they excel. The parts are interchangeable, they have depth, their young, they work well together and they are well coached.
2) With a new scheme there will be a learning curve, obviously, but I like the call for more aggressiveness which i feel will also aid the run defense. With excellent safety coverage they can afford to be more aggressive.
3) If the offense can sustain drives, for a change, it will give the defense a much needed rest, which is why I applaud the power running attack and play action passes. I don’t think there will be many deep balls thrown because that’s not Trent’s strength (Yes, Mr. Checkdown will flourish, hopefully like Pennington).
I wanted to do some research on time of posession by each quarter, especially the first half, how many sustained drives by the offense and defense stops. Well that’s some of the stuff …..pick it apart guys. :)
Something is wrong with the title
BillsPass Defense In LineFor 2010 Regression
There…fixed it :-)
If all the stars align, pigs learn to fly, humanity achieves world peace, doctors discover a cure for cancer, scientists perfect cold fusion, and hell freezes over, the Bills might win the SB this year.
derp!!!
BillsPass DefenseIn Line For 2010 Regression
If all the stars align, pigs learn to fly, humanity achieves world peace, doctors discover a cure for cancer, scientists perfect cold fusion, and hell freezes over, the Bills might win the SB this year.

by 

















