Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

C.J. Spiller - What are your thoughts?

With the season now done, I wanted to get a poll up to see Bills fan's opinions of Spiller after his rookie season. We know he is quick, and fast, but at least for this year, it didn't translate to performance on the field. With that in mind, tell me? What is your opinion of Spiller at this point? Should we have spent a #9 pick on him? Are you happy with the pick? If not, who would you rather have drafted? Is Spiller going to be a star who needs another year to develop, or is he on the fast track to bust city?

Poll
How do you feel at this point of spending a #9 pick on C.J. Spiller?
GREAT! Did you see that return against the Pats??? In Chix we trust!!!
9 votes
Good! He has shown flashes in the return game, he will be the next Jamaal Charles, he just needs one more year to prove it!
93 votes
Mediocre. I know he has elite measurables, but he sure hasn't shown it on the field yet. I sure hope he does someday.
162 votes
Poor. He is the next Trung Canidate, one and done with his rookie contract. Why did we ever draft a guy with a 10 on the Wonderlich??? Wish we drafted someone else.
35 votes

299 votes | Poll has closed

Just another great fan opinion shared on the pages of BuffaloRumblings.com.

Comment 62 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

He'll be OK

his just not the player we need at this time we have to strengthen our lines then go from there we had a surplus of talent at RB. Chix drafting him has never made sense to me besides using the excuse of him being the B.P.A. They could have at least took the ten minutes instead of rushing up to the podium to hear offers other teams were giving us for that pick

Rrrawrrrr, rrrawrrr like a dungeon dragon-Busta Ryhmes
This just hurts. I'm sorry Rumblers but I'm crushed

by Moe_frm_B_ on Jan 24, 2011 2:12 AM EST reply actions  

Yeah, that hurried pick really pissed me off.

"Adversity is an opportunity for heroism." Marv Levy.

by SERGEANT MAJOR THOR on Jan 24, 2011 7:22 PM EST up reply actions  

I voted good. I dont know if he will become the next J. Charles or not but he will be a good RB in this leauge.

No I did not like the pick. I was and still am of the belief that Bulaga, Davis, or Saffold would have been better then any OT we will get in this years draft, and would have been the way to go. I believe they knew they would get rid of Lynch so RB was a position of need to them. They were hoping to push him in fast and furious as was demonstrated by him beeing the starter in week #1, but he was not ready. I think they then decided to work him in slow, and try to put him in positions that he could be succesfull. This tact was hated by most fans, but IMO will be good for him in setting him up for next year.

Spiller is going to be fine if he will learn from FJ on how to not take the big loss. He needs some help from the OL as he needs a biger hole than FJ but when he gets that hole watch out. I also think we need to get better on the OL outside blocking. This is where Spiller will shine, but Bell, and the revolving door at RT did not help him at all. I in no way think he is a bust, but we could have done better with that pick.

Please base your arguments in provable facts instead of pulling stuff out of your rear. -CanadianBillsFan- This is why talk is cheap because the supply always exceeds the demand.

by jbbillfan on Jan 24, 2011 3:06 AM EST reply actions  

I don't know

how good he’ll be (personally, I think he’ll figure it out.), but please, please, please don’t keep judging him off of one year.
Give the kid another year and then we’ll start talking how he’ll turn out.

"the BUFFALO BILLS ARE COMING TO TOWN and I dont mean like Santa clause. WE will not Surrender this is were you all FALL The WHAGON BLASTER IS TAKING OFF AND YOU PUNKS are in our way, This wagon has no BREAKS so get ready for the ride of the life time"-abayarde

by HardBeingABillsFan on Jan 24, 2011 3:15 AM EST reply actions  

That puts it perfectly. Given the fact that the Bills needed an immediate impact player with their #9 pick last year he was a mediocre choice to be sure, but as to whether or not he is going to be a valuable contributor over the long run we will know a lot more by this time next year (assuming there is an NFL season).

by Macktruck on Jan 24, 2011 1:17 PM EST up reply actions  

Why did the Bills need an immediate impact player in year one of what is expected to be a three year rebuild? Given we were 4-12 and it came down to the last game to decide if we picked 3 through 9. If said player resulted in us winning 1 more game then we did we would have been picking early middle as we have for the last 5-6 years. Call me crazy but if you ever have a chance to take a luxury pick that needs time to develop its year one of the rebuild.

by Robot Nixon on Jan 24, 2011 7:03 PM EST up reply actions  

Call me crazy but if you ever have a chance to take a luxury pick that needs time to develop its year one of the rebuild.

You can take a need pick like Bulaga at OT in year 1 of a rebuild, OT is the second hardest position to develop after QB on Offense. If it works out, it makes it easier to develop a QB. We had running backs, Spiller was a bad pick, a scat back at 9. You can getgood scat backs from early 2nd rd on. Just ask KC and Detroit. I predict when La Michael James enters the draft, he is looking at late first rd at very best and maybe lower, just because of the Spiller reach. Teams don’t want to make the mistake we did.

Kylesaurus Rex Williams Pro Bowl 2010

by The Buffalo Kid on Jan 25, 2011 2:13 AM EST up reply actions  

Spiller reach? I know some mocks had him as a late round first but I know several people had him listed as BPA on the board at 9 and possibly the BPA in the draft…

by aquias on Jan 25, 2011 8:44 AM EST up reply actions  

I remember there being discussion if he was an every-down back. I don’t see why the Bills would draft him that early not to be an every-down back someday. You can’t draft guys near the top of their class to be part-time players, right?

Right? I hope so, at least.

In the year two thousaaaaaaand.
In the year two thousAAAAAAND!

Current song recommendation: Ween "Mr. Richard Smoker"

by TheAfghanTwilight on Jan 25, 2011 10:54 AM EST up reply actions  

You can in Buffalo.

And hope that they are at least good enough to play part time. I’ve been done with the “rebuilding” “fresh start” “three year plan” since before it started so I’m not the one to ask.

by twoeightnine on Jan 25, 2011 7:16 PM EST up reply actions  

No, lets run him out of town and hate him and chix for getting drafted/drafting him 9th overall.

Fresnobillsfan

by Frenobillsfan on Jan 24, 2011 2:36 PM EST up reply actions  

I feel he is soft and has alot to learn

The only positions I feel really translate well for rookies in the NFL are OL and CB and for thats about it I exp[ect large impact for guys in those positions early on in their careers, that being said I did expect a little more out of Cliff to be honest but I didn’t expect the world so im in the middle on his rookie campaign.

He really needs to work on making the first guy miss or just plain staying on his feet after intial contact, he needs to take a page from Freddie’s book and no matter what play in the game or what down he needs to not run out of bounds and lower his head and get that extra half a yard and he needs to improve his pass blocking so we can keep him in the game on downs where hes not getting the ball so its not so obvious.

"Big Gulps Eh, Well See ya later" - Lloyd Christmas
" You Gus ready To Let The Dogs Out" "What?" " you Know, Who Let the dogs out rough rough rogh rough" - Zack Galifinakis - The Hangover

by PaullyPforPrez on Jan 24, 2011 7:45 AM EST reply actions  

Was great at Clemson

but obviously has a lot to prove. Maybe it was the system or he needs a better offensive line, or they didn’t use him enough, we will have to wait and see. I did watch him quite a bit at Clemson and thought he would make quite an impact in the NFL, so I am surprised that he didn’t play that well as a rookie.

by BuffaloWhiner on Jan 24, 2011 8:21 AM EST reply actions  

Had Spiller just been mediocre, it would have been disappointing enough. For a team with amazingly little talent on their roster like Buffalo to be ballsy enough to use a top 10 pick on a gimmick scatback, Spiller needs to be great when it’s all said and done to justify the pick. I thought he was actually bad- really bad- his entire rookie season. For most of the season, he was a below average kick returner with ball security issues that was too timid towards contact in the backfield. For all his supposed speed, defenders were easily able to steer him to the sidelines where he walked harmlessly out of bounds. Buffalo would be crazy to give up in such an important investment, so you have to hope he comes back in 2011 with it all figured out, but in terms of evaluating his rookie season? I can’t imagine how it could have been any worse.

"There's only one C.J. Spiller." -Buddy Nix

by Port Royal on Jan 24, 2011 9:18 AM EST reply actions   2 recs

Voted mediocre

Mostly because I think he’ll be more useful than Trung Canidate. I would have voted poor if worded differently.

Wasn’t real happy with the pick, and was even more unhappy once he got on the field. To say he was terrible would be kind. He’s a scatback and really doesn’t look like more than that. I don’t see him ever establishing himself as more than a part-time player. He simply cannot run between the tackles and just looks too weak, gunshy and incapable of breaking tackles. Will that change? Perhaps, but i doubt it.

What he does need to do is start securing the ball and working on his vision. If he’s going to be successful, it’ll be due to cutbacks and making defenders miss. He couldn’t do that at all this past year, so that may not be in his repertoire, but I’ll leave that possibility on the table. Once he gets into the open field, he’ll be tough to stop. Getting there is his biggest problem. He has to start beating defenders to the corner and he has to start making guys miss. It’s as simple as that. If he can’t do that, he’s never going to amount to much more than he currently is.

Oh, hang onto the ball as well, kid.

~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."

by Kurupt on Jan 24, 2011 11:56 AM EST reply actions   1 recs

oh yea!

I stand with K again.

prediction for 2010 season is 3 and 13

by jpheff on Jan 26, 2011 5:38 PM EST up reply actions  

still excited to see him play

he has the will, ability and attitude.

"The Buffalo Bills have just exploded all over the Cincinnati Bangles"
-Steve Tasker-

by billsoferie on Jan 24, 2011 12:37 PM EST reply actions  

agreed

i’m sure i’m going to regret this conversation… but what the hell - J2

by poz on Jan 24, 2011 12:51 PM EST up reply actions  

Good or great RB on a bad team, or bad NFL RB on a bad team, hard to tell 1 year and 70ish carries into his career, a wish i had the forsight of some guys here.

Most runningbacks need to get into a grove on the field before they break long runs, Jamal Charles is the exception to the rule. I think the more CJ plays, the better he will get, and thats all that matters to me in regaurds to Mr. Spiller.He’s a Buffalo Bill and I’m going to root for him for the next 3years. If he’s failed after 4 years, then i’ll call it a bad pick of a bad player.

Fresnobillsfan

by Frenobillsfan on Jan 24, 2011 2:45 PM EST reply actions   2 recs

THANK YOU!

Rec’d. Perfectly said Freno. Perfect. The guy has 70 career carries. He was sitting behind Marshawn Lynch and Fred Jackson. He never was able to find a groove, totally understandable behind our offensive line. And I dont need to hear that Fred was able to. Fred is a seasoned veteran who runs a completely different style.

Im also not sure why everyone is in such a rush to put mileage on a prized back like CJ Spiller. I think the beauty of the situation is that Fred Jackson is a great back who can keep this team moving forward – at the age of 30 hes probably got 2 more good years left. As the time comes into its own during the rebuild CJ can become a featured guy without having wasted the precious few carries that a RB gets in his NFL lifetime before breaking down by rushing on bad teams. Fred as he ages can extend his career by giving way to CJ as well – like Chester Taylor in Chicago with Forte.

i’m sure i’m going to regret this conversation… but what the hell - J2

by poz on Jan 24, 2011 2:59 PM EST up reply actions  

Wasnt he actually the starter at the beginning of the year?

And NOT sitting behind Lynch and Jackson?

The score dictated they pass

by norcaliangelsfan on Jan 24, 2011 4:02 PM EST up reply actions  

people keep saying that

but Im more concerned with whether or not he actually was starting rather than just being one in name. He had 7 carries that game.

Everyone wants to rag on Spillers rookie season as if he had run for 1,000+ yards we’d all be saved and it would have been worth it. Marshawn Lynch started his career with two back to back 1,000+ yard seasons and hes not on the team anymore. I just hate judging a guy after one year.

i’m sure i’m going to regret this conversation… but what the hell - J2

by poz on Jan 24, 2011 5:10 PM EST up reply actions  

He never even got a shot really though

Chan Gailey showed time and time again he was willing to give up on trying to run the ball.

The Bills as a team were 25th in the league in rushing attempts (Tied with SF)

Spiller himself barely avg 6 “TOUCHES” a game offensively.

That’s not all on CJ…………..Chan needs to take some heat for that as well.

The score dictated they pass

by norcaliangelsfan on Jan 24, 2011 6:38 PM EST up reply actions  

Took the words right out my mouth.

by blknites on Jan 25, 2011 3:36 AM EST up reply actions  

I totally agree

i’m sure i’m going to regret this conversation… but what the hell - J2

by poz on Jan 24, 2011 7:07 PM EST up reply actions  

Marshawn Lynch is still a Bill if the personality conflict wasn’t apparent and the drama surrounding him never came to be.

They probably didn’t enjoy the fact of letting him go, with him being a 1st-rounder who showed a strong ability to dominate as a RB.

In the year two thousaaaaaaand.
In the year two thousAAAAAAND!

Current song recommendation: Ween "Mr. Richard Smoker"

by TheAfghanTwilight on Jan 25, 2011 10:57 AM EST up reply actions  

Uh.............

I dont know if I agree with your last sentence………

I hardly saw any domination by Lynch………if ever.

The score dictated they pass

by norcaliangelsfan on Jan 25, 2011 11:07 AM EST up reply actions  

He's a speciality player..........

He has game breaking possibility………but you cant expect him to be a 20 carry a game back. That’s not his game.

He needs to be in better positions to be successful IMO……….but he has some personal stuff to work on too regarding his game.

Unfortunately it looks like another luxury pick when the Bills are in the position to draft that type of players (See also……..Maybin, Aaron)

The score dictated they pass

by norcaliangelsfan on Jan 24, 2011 3:59 PM EST reply actions  

I’d actually like to see him get 20 carries a game, in the preseason when he was the only back he started slow but then found a groove and made up the lost yardage on a few big plays. I believe it was right after the colts game Brian wrote an article about him being very boom or bust at this point in his career. Cut the regular season and him getting six touches half of which end with 2-3 guys in the backfield before he can take two steps and your not going to see a lot of the boom just the bust.

by Robot Nixon on Jan 24, 2011 7:11 PM EST up reply actions  

I dont know about 20 carries......

but 20 touches (another 5 with ST) seems about where it should be…….

at least IMO.

he barely got 10 touches most weeks………….Look at the last NE game……he got 80 something yards on 8 touches…….sure he’s boom or bust right now.

He’s more likely to boom if he gets enough chances……………..and gets them in the right positions.

The score dictated they pass

by norcaliangelsfan on Jan 24, 2011 7:15 PM EST up reply actions  

Next Reggie Bush?

Reggie is a more of a gadget player for the Saints that they drafted to sell ticket’s at a time of need. This is how I see CJ, (without the ticket thing) With Jackson not getting any younger. we still need an every down back. You shouldn’t still need an every down back after you take one in the first round. Will he be exciting to watch from time to time? yes. He may even win a game or two for us, but I don’t think any Bills fan will ever think “man, we have CJ, we can’t lose this one” .

"This is what happens Larry!, This is what happens! "-Walter Sobchak" "Did we give up when the germans bombed pearl harbor!!??"-John Belushi

by BigEasyBillsKrewe on Jan 25, 2011 1:10 PM EST up reply actions  

AHAHA! REC

"This is what happens Larry!, This is what happens! "-Walter Sobchak" "Did we give up when the germans bombed pearl harbor!!??"-John Belushi

by BigEasyBillsKrewe on Jan 25, 2011 10:12 PM EST up reply actions  

After watching the game last night i can see why Starks has been so good.

The holes his line is creating for him are huge. I know that Fred worked with the line we had and was still able to be successful, but CJ is not the type of runner that Fred is. It would be interesting to see how spiller would have performed if he were to play with a line like that in the game yesterday.

"When I came here, I didn't know anybody, ... I wanted to see what true Buffalonians are like. And so I met them, and they're just like me - just very, very real people. They're not fake or phony. They're not fluff."
-J.P Losman

by freddy22 on Jan 24, 2011 4:50 PM EST reply actions  

It must be painful for Gailey to learn that the offensive line they’ve “assembled” isn’t well-suited to the type of player Spiller is. I still think Jackson continues to produce regardless of the blocking scheme. He’s a very underrated talent in the NFL.

In the year two thousaaaaaaand.
In the year two thousAAAAAAND!

Current song recommendation: Ween "Mr. Richard Smoker"

by TheAfghanTwilight on Jan 25, 2011 10:59 AM EST up reply actions  

I believe it is always dumb to draft a RB in the 1st round

Yes, running backs are very important to winning, because establishing the run is one of the first things teams should do to start a game. But let’s face it, you do not need to spend that high of a pick and spend that kind of money on a running back. Yes there are great 1st round running backs…Peterson, C. Johnson, Mendenhall, DeAngelo, Stewart, S. Jackson, Moreno, McFadden, but guess what, only one of those guys was even in the playoffs, and he wasn’t the reason, it was defense and coaching.

You can find great running backs in any round, Mojo – 2nd, Rice – 3rd, Foster – undrafted, Charles – 3rd, Turner – 5th, F. Jackson – undrafted, Green-Ellis – undrafted, Hillis – 7th, McCoy – 3rd, Forte – 2nd, any Packers RB, Ivory – undrafted, Blount – undrafted, Gore – 3rd.

The Bills have used a 1st round pick on a running back 3 times the past 7 drafts – McGahee (Raven), Lynch (Seahawk), and now Spiller, tell me how well that is working out for us. The Panthers did it in ‘06 and ’08, tell me how that all worked out. I don’t care who the player is, it is such a bad idea to take a running back in the 1st round, there’s so much more value in other positions. Just like this year, a team can probably get Noel Devine in the 4th or 5th round and will have a great RB for the next 5 years til they need a new one and he’s burned out.

So yeah, it was dumb to take Spiller, he might be fast and athletic and be able to return punts and kicks, but so can Devin Hester and Josh Cribbs, a 9th overall pick wasn’t wasted on them, kinda like how the Dolphins took Ted Ginn 9th overall, that worked out well.

"I heard that Tits was "well rounded" and his brother Cans was a "stand out." :D"
by Old Braves' Fan on Aug 18, 2010 3:05 PM PDT

by BravesRaleigh on Jan 24, 2011 6:14 PM EST reply actions  

kinda like how the Dolphins took Ted Ginn 9th overall, that worked out well.

Or kinda like how the Vikings took Adrian Peterson 7th overall? Or kinda how like the Chargers – with Buddy Nix as part of the staff – took LaDanian Tomlinson 5th overall? Yea, you can find good backs later in the draft but you can find hall of fame backs at the top of the draft. I dont think you figured this RB pattern out and Buddy and the Bills front office didn’t. Therefore, I conclude that Buddy and his team though CJ Spiller was special in that Tomlinson/Peterson type of way. Lets give them time to find out. LT got 300+ carries his rookie year / Peterson got 200+ carries. Spiller got 70+ because they were showing off Beast Mode and Fred Jackson is a good player and there is no reason to run CJ’s mileage up on a bad team when Fred can handle the current offensive line better.

i’m sure i’m going to regret this conversation… but what the hell - J2

by poz on Jan 24, 2011 7:13 PM EST up reply actions  

Different backs Poz.

Peterson could body slam CJ, He is a much more stronger specimen than CJ. LT and Peterson, have much better lower body strength than CJ.

  1. is way too high for a fast as a waterbug scatback. I think draftniks are realizing this, low 1st early 2nd is the highest scatbacks should be drafted.

Kylesaurus Rex Williams Pro Bowl 2010

by The Buffalo Kid on Jan 25, 2011 1:42 AM EST up reply actions  

should have said
  1. is way too high for a fast as waterbug scatback.

Peterson and LT have powerful lower bodies, CJ does not. It’s why he goes down so easy on arm tackles. He can’t power through them by keeping his legs moving.

Kylesaurus Rex Williams Pro Bowl 2010

by The Buffalo Kid on Jan 25, 2011 1:45 AM EST up reply actions  

Grrrr should have said.
  1. is way too high for a fast as waterbug scatback.

Kylesaurus Rex Williams Pro Bowl 2010

by The Buffalo Kid on Jan 25, 2011 1:47 AM EST up reply actions  

I give up

It says #9when i post, but shows up 1.

Kylesaurus Rex Williams Pro Bowl 2010

by The Buffalo Kid on Jan 25, 2011 1:48 AM EST up reply actions  

Yeah, Peterson and LT were/are great.

How have they done in the playoffs? Peterson’s only been once, and it was because of Favre connecting with Rice and Shiancoe. LT has never been the reason his team made it to the playoffs, yeah hes good, but you can find his kind of production anywhere. There’s no way Spiller has the same value as Peterson or LT, that’s just wrong.

"I heard that Tits was "well rounded" and his brother Cans was a "stand out." :D"
by Old Braves' Fan on Aug 18, 2010 3:05 PM PDT

by BravesRaleigh on Jan 26, 2011 12:43 PM EST up reply actions  

spiller has great potential

gailey will find a way to use him right next yr….

still think his taking linebackers downfield was
the most underused element of his game.

was open against kc for td, overthrown, made
a great catch for 40 plus against pats in home
finale, great play ….

have no idea what he was doing fumbling all
those times…

i think chan needs to run more, other than that,
i love chan’s offensive play calling…

spiller should get more runs and catches next
yr…hopefully take a few back on punts and kickoffs
as well…

he did average 14 plus on punts, not bad

by simonpure on Jan 24, 2011 8:32 PM EST reply actions  

Spiller will be good

I still don’t agree with the pick, but he’s got talent. He probably won’t ever be a feature back or a 25 carries a game back but there is a place for him and Gailey will probably find it.

Ryan Fitzpatrick -- Buffalo's new flavor at QB -- Diet Flutie

by NordicBillsfan on Jan 24, 2011 10:28 PM EST reply actions  

yeah and thats not worth 9th overall, thats 2nd round at the highest, cough devin hester

"I heard that Tits was "well rounded" and his brother Cans was a "stand out." :D"
by Old Braves' Fan on Aug 18, 2010 3:05 PM PDT

by BravesRaleigh on Jan 26, 2011 12:45 PM EST up reply actions  

Voted Mediocre

Only because there wasn’t the option for “To early to tell”.

IMO, Chan didn’t work him in as much as we would have liked simply because we don’t yet have the O line needed for the style in which he in visions him in. Would Bulaga or Saffold been better picks in the first? Who knows. Perhaps those tackles weren’t the mauler type needed to run Chan’s offense.

I do agree that Spiller looks like he plays ‘smaller’ than I would have liked for a pick at #9. Charles runs tougher through the tackles for example. But then again, until I see CJ play behind an O line built for the power run, I’ll reserve judgement.

by DJ O on Jan 24, 2011 11:59 PM EST reply actions  

Would Bulaga or Saffold been better picks in the first? Who knows. Perhaps those tackles weren’t the mauler type needed to run Chan’s offense.

Bulaga was definitely a mauler. The question on him was did he have long enough arms to play LT?

Kylesaurus Rex Williams Pro Bowl 2010

by The Buffalo Kid on Jan 25, 2011 1:34 AM EST up reply actions  

And the other question was.....

Was the poor performance against Brandon Graham, the thyroid issue or talent?

Kylesaurus Rex Williams Pro Bowl 2010

by The Buffalo Kid on Jan 25, 2011 1:36 AM EST up reply actions  

I’m not sold that he was a mauler. He may have run blocked effectively in college on the left side of a zone blocking scheme, but the skill set required for Chan’s offense on the right side is totally different.

Here’s what one scouting report said of Bulaga;

“He is not as strong as fellow Big ten linemen Joe Thomas or Jake Long, but he’s still very young and has time to develop. Bulaga’s run blocking has also improved steadily over the last two seasons. He is no longer satisfied just blocking the man in front of him, he moves on to the next level and tries to get a block on a linebacker as well. The best fit for Bulaga would be on a zone blocking team in the NFL.”

This, combined with his 26 reps on the bench proves to me that our FO requires VERY strong individual’s to man the RT position in our power rushing scheme. Not average strength lineman with quick feet needed in a zone blocking scheme (like Green Bay’s).

by DJ O on Jan 25, 2011 12:52 PM EST up reply actions  

This, combined with his 26 reps on the bench proves to me that our FO requires VERY strong individual’s to man the RT position in our power rushing scheme. Not average strength lineman with quick feet needed in a zone blocking scheme (like Green Bay’s).

Power rushing scheme???

I didn’t realize we even had one with all the spread we use.

Kylesaurus Rex Williams Pro Bowl 2010

by The Buffalo Kid on Jan 26, 2011 12:53 AM EST up reply actions  

To add.

And the way we constantly abandoned the run last year.

Kylesaurus Rex Williams Pro Bowl 2010

by The Buffalo Kid on Jan 26, 2011 12:54 AM EST up reply actions  

this is what i think...

i like CJ and think he has a ton of upside. the speed of the game completely overwhelmed him. he was used to running circles around college players with ease. then when he gets to the nfl and LB’S are running 4.4 – 4.7 40’s and the holes close up as fast as they do he couldnt adjust. i think with this season in the bags, he will learn from fred to just be more decisive and take what the defense gives you. every run doesn’t have to be for 20+, although that would be nice LOL. Additionally, i think he needs to spend time with the WR’s in the offseason to work on his route running and receiver skills. if he does that (in addition to his duties as a RB) i think we will get more use out of him offensively and can be put in the slot at times, especially as a reserve if roscoe were to go down again…let’s keep hope alive guys!

by youngchamp on Jan 25, 2011 10:52 AM EST reply actions  

Wow, I had no idea his wonderlic score was so low.

Not that his position requires a high score to be successful, but it may be a factor in his slow start.

In the year two thousaaaaaaand.
In the year two thousAAAAAAND!

Current song recommendation: Ween "Mr. Richard Smoker"

by TheAfghanTwilight on Jan 25, 2011 11:01 AM EST reply actions  

Have you seen his tweets?

It didnt take long to figure out he wasnt a Rhodes Scholar candidate.

The score dictated they pass

by norcaliangelsfan on Jan 25, 2011 11:08 AM EST up reply actions  

If it wasn’t for football he might have been a roads scholar.

More likely a roadie :)

Kylesaurus Rex Williams Pro Bowl 2010

by The Buffalo Kid on Jan 26, 2011 12:55 AM EST up reply actions  

HAHAHAHA!!!!!!!! That’s not funny.

by youngchamp on Jan 25, 2011 11:14 AM EST reply actions  

What?

whats not funny?

"When I came here, I didn't know anybody, ... I wanted to see what true Buffalonians are like. And so I met them, and they're just like me - just very, very real people. They're not fake or phony. They're not fluff."
-J.P Losman

by freddy22 on Jan 25, 2011 6:03 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

SB Nation's home for all things Buffalo Bills.
Community Guidelines :: Essential BR

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Bills_small
An Exploration of Ryan Fitzpatrick's TDs and INTs
Small
Beyond the Perfect Offseason: Where Do We Go From Here?
Dsc00843_small
NFL Divisional Record And Playoff Berth Correlation, 2002-2011

Recent FanPosts

Small
Who Will be the Number 2?
Spikes_small
Remaining Free Agents
04_buffalo_bills_football_coloring_at_coloring-pages-book-for-kids-boys_small
Mock 2012 Season
Small
The Return of the Running Back(s): Revisiting the Road to the Super Bowl
Small
Difference Between A "Franchise" QB and an "Elite" One
303857_872291743296_10504698_40499694_6362492_n_small
Be A Little Nicer Please, Bills Fans  :)
Cyclops1-12nd7cv_small
Current QB Wins
Small
The Count-Down to the Right Numbers
Bruuuuce_small
Ranking All 32 NFL Starting QB's : Who is ELITE?
Snapshot_20120113_small
Next Stop: 3rd Generation of Winners

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Screen_shot_2012-03-07_at_6 Brian Galliford

100_2488_small MattRichWarren

Authors

Range_march_2011_small Ron From NM

Slide1_small Der Jaeger

Moderators

Sucks_small Kurupt

Mrsinister03_small sireric

Cordy_small poz