Buffalo Bills Wide Receivers: State Of The Bills Roster
This post is part of a series entitled State of the Bills Roster, in which we're breaking down and evaluating the Buffalo Bills on a position-by-position basis. If you're confused about the number and letter classification appearing after each player's name, read this post. You can check out all previous installments of this series here.
If there was one Bills positional group that exceeded expectations in a monumental manner in 2010, it was most definitely the team's wide receivers. Buffalo entered the year with nothing more than Lee Evans and a bunch of question marks. From Roscoe Parrish to Stevie Johnson to David Nelson and even to Donald Jones and Naaman Roosevelt, many of those question marks turned into, bare minimum, pleasant surprises.
Now, with the group getting healthier and with a far bigger degree of stability at quarterback than they had at the outset of the 2010 season, this young group of receivers - five key contributors (or future contributors) are all aged 25 or younger - has a lot of promise to deliver on.
Our take on Buffalo's solid group of wide receivers lies after the jump.
Right now, the Bills have ten wide receivers in their organization.
Lee Evans (2-B). For whatever reason - likely his salary - Bills fans have been disappointed in Evans for a number of years. I thought his 2010 season, before it ended due to injury (the first major injury of his career), was better than I expected it to be. No, his numbers weren't great, but playing receiver is about more than numbers, and Evans was still the guy that opposing defenses sought to eliminate first. That opened the door for Buffalo's younger guys to be productive, and as long as Evans keeps defenses soft underneath, he'll have a vital role on this football team.
Roscoe Parrish (2-B). In terms of pleasant surprises, it can be argued that none was more pleasant than Parrish. This guy caught three passes in 2009, then came back with 33 catches, 400 yards and two scores in eight games. Parrish is what he is - a slot receiver - but it's clear that Chan Gailey likes him in that role, and has plans to use him there for the foreseeable future. For a guy that many believed wouldn't make the team, that's a nice little role shift from year to year.
Stevie Johnson (2-C). Johnson came out of nowhere to emerge as Ryan Fitzpatrick's go-to receiver in 2010, and right now, he looks like the team's best receiver. After hauling in 82 passes for 1,073 yards and 10 touchdowns, there isn't much to say about Johnson that hasn't already been said. Guy is the real deal.
David Nelson (2-C). The undrafted rookie free agent out of Florida was productive no matter what role he was fulfilling, whether he was the team's fourth receiver, their primary slot receiver, or a full-time starter, as he was when the season wrapped up. His 35 receptions, 353 yards and three scores are especially promising given his measurables (6'5"), and he looks primed to enjoy a lengthy career as a dependable possession receiver with red zone capabilities.
Marcus Easley (3-D). Taking over Stevie's role as "that young receiver who hasn't done a thing yet but is going to be awesome, no questions asked" is Easley, the 2010 fourth-round pick that missed his entire rookie season with a knee injury. He reportedly looked great in mini-camps and at the outset of training camp, and he'll get his opportunity to deliver on his immense potential next season.
Donald Jones (3-D). Jones was up and down as a receiver, producing nice numbers (18 receptions, 213 yards, 1 TD) in limited work as a slot option. I thought his best impact came as a punt gunner; Jones has a lot of promise as one of the team's young, core specialists. He's proven that he belongs in the league, but he might have an uphill climb getting back onto the field with the offense in 2011.
Naaman Roosevelt (3-D). The local product, and the third undrafted free agent on this list, is not as talented as his rookie cohorts. After spending most of the season on the practice squad, he snuck into the lineup due to injury and looked like he belongs, making a few plays late in the season.
Felton Huggins (4-F). People were quick to dismiss Huggins last pre-season, but he was quietly having a very good spring and summer before his season, too, ended due to a shoulder injury. Buffalo waived/injured him in August, but as far as I am aware, he cleared waivers and landed on Buffalo's IR list.
Paul Hubbard (4-F). Proof that the Bills like to stockpile big, athletic receivers, Hubbard was on and off Buffalo's roster throughout the season, spending most of it on the practice squad.
Bobby Williams (4-F). He ended the season on the practice squad, and that is about the extent of my knowledge on Bobby Williams.
Contract situations to monitor: Johnson's deal is perhaps the biggest situation to watch across the roster, as he's entering the final year of his four-year rookie deal, and will be severely underpaid in 2011. The sooner the team can begin negotiations there, the better. Parrish, too, is entering the final year of his deal, while Evans is signed through 2012 (and due $1 million roster bonuses in each of the next two seasons).
Outlook: This group really was a lot of fun to watch in 2010, not just because of the production, but because of the comfort level with the depth. This is truly the deepest, most talented positional group on Buffalo's roster, and it's nice to see a group able to produce from top-to-bottom; that depth needs to be replicated as closely as possible across the rest of the roster. In Johnson and Nelson, the team has productive young role players with big potential, and in Evans and Parrish, they've got reliable veterans. Easley is the wild card; if he realizes his potential, the Bills might have a true stud at the position.
Possible Acquisition: Buffalo doesn't need to add a receiver, but the idea of drafting A.J. Green is tempting. Johnson was able to hurt defenses at all levels of the field in 2010, but doesn't have the long speed to be a true deep threat. If Buffalo has a shot at Green, who can make plays at any level of the field with ease, they'll think seriously about adding him. Beyond that, they're good.
92 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Adding Green is a luxury, but would be quite a statement to our playmaking abilities.
Having said that… we might have that guy in Marcus Easley that none of us really know what we have in the guy.
I am afraid Rosevelt and below are on the outside looking in for the 53 man roster.
$8mil will be a lot to pay for Evan next year, but they do have the $ to do it.
Im not going to look at the contract, but I believe he is owed a lot less than that in the last few years of his contract.
by Eric Murawski on Jan 28, 2011 10:03 AM EST up reply actions
According to rotoworld Evans is owed $3.225M base and $1M roster bonus.
Evans salary in 2011 and 2012 is $4.225M give or take any other LTE or UTBE bonus monies.
http://www.rotoworld.com/content/playerpages/player_contract.aspx?sport=NFL&id=26
"‘Fight on my men,’ Sir Andrew said, ‘a little I’m hurt, but not yet slain.
I’ll just lie down and bleed a while then I’ll rise to fight again.’"
Which is why you keep Evans.
FA WRs aren’t cheap. Remember L Coles a couple years ago? He was getting $6 million+ and he was barely average.
As long as Evans is worth being in the top 3 WRs on the team you keep him. And right now he has a low cost going forward. That he got more than he produced in the past is irrelevant.
Exactly. Let him at least play out the last 2 years of his contract.
Lee Evans isn’t going anywhere. So tired of the people bringing up the trade Evans topic. Those people just need to stop it.
"‘Fight on my men,’ Sir Andrew said, ‘a little I’m hurt, but not yet slain.
I’ll just lie down and bleed a while then I’ll rise to fight again.’"
Easley ran a 4.39 at the combine…he has the speed. What i’ve read on him states that he struggles with drops.
In the year two thousaaaaaaand.
In the year two thousAAAAAAND!
Current song recommendation: Ween "Mr. Richard Smoker"
by TheAfghanTwilight on Jan 28, 2011 10:08 AM EST up reply actions
He's a young WR.
Johnson drops his fair share as well. We’ll form our opinions on Easley once he gets the chance to prove what he can or cant do in camp/preseason.
"‘Fight on my men,’ Sir Andrew said, ‘a little I’m hurt, but not yet slain.
I’ll just lie down and bleed a while then I’ll rise to fight again.’"
i agree on the roosevelt statement
i doubt we cut lee, you have to have an outside burner, the super bowl teams really started dominating offensively when they signed lofton, it opened up the whole field for reed
I wouldn’t be so quick to underrate Roosevelt. He has an uncanny ability to make really difficult catches in clutch stuations. A guy like that is worth his keep.
I feel like David Nelson fills that roll for this team though, and in my opinion Nelson is a better athlete and route runner.
by Eric Murawski on Jan 28, 2011 11:42 AM EST up reply actions
It’s going to be tough – we have Easley, Jones, and Roosevelt all competing to really to claim a roster spot with Evans, Johnson, and Nelson having established themselves as reliable pros. Roscoe Parrish shoots the gap, to some extent – he’s not quite as exciting as anyone else on the roster. Still, it’d be frustrating to watch him get cut for a prospect who didn’t match his rookie potential.
If we do grab AJ Green, he’d slide into the role as the top dog, with Johnson lining up across from him and Evans in the slot, which would really cost Parrish his role on the team.
This
It would also add a much larger more durable target in the mix. I love Rosco as a player, his heart and soul is not doubted. The fact that he is 5’9 and Lee is 5’10 and both less than two hundred pounds is one reason why I would consider Green. The other reason is that A.J. Green is not listed as the next Andre Johnson or Calvin Johnson for the heck of it. This kid has the potential to make anyone on our WR squad expendible.
YOU ARE OUT of you kuku fufu mine craker laker Flaber baber FUNKI chunki brain. WE want to winn every year -- abayarde
I like this group of young receivers.
Stevie is the teams best though. Even after Lee went down, they all still peformed well. I think the talk of ‘Evans being the guy teams eliminate first’ to explain his mediocrre production is overstated. Evans is the #2 WR on the team now. I also can’t wait to see how Marcus Easley does next year.
Who cares about who is deemed the "#1" or "#2" WR.
They each have their strengths and weaknesses that play off each other. I hate that terminology when people try to classify WR’s. There are very few guys in the league that I would classify as a #1 WR based on my interpretation of that term. Andre Johnson would be one of those guys. Calvin Johnson is another. There are only a handful of these guys in the league. After that it starts to tail off compared to rest of the WR’s in the league.
"‘Fight on my men,’ Sir Andrew said, ‘a little I’m hurt, but not yet slain.
I’ll just lie down and bleed a while then I’ll rise to fight again.’"
I said that based on the fact that Evans has been called ‘the guy that teams focus in on’ and a lot of fans say that his stats arent as good as they could be because of that reason. I just think that Stevie is a better receiver, and that Lee is overrated. You’re right though, #1 and #2 shouldnt matter that much.
Who cares about who is deemed the “#1” or “#2” WR.
Rec’d
Actually you touch on a very good point for the Bills going forward and Chan talked about throughout the year… (The packers do this very well too). It is not essential to have one main guy on your team, but if you can have several that can make plays, then it is tough for the defense to lock in on one aspect of the passing game like safety help over the top of whatever side Evans is playing.
I like when the Packers sub out their passing package for a double TE and double RB package, then throw to Jordy Nelson on a crossing route because they know he’ll be man on man and can beat his guy inside…
Rotating players, keeping motion in the backfield and pre-snap…. different looks and player packages make successful offenses.
this is in part to Fitz as well
and the players reflect this as well, the guy will throw it to any WR on any given play. He trusts them to make playes and did they ever this season. if you put that offense on a team with the defense of the steelers, we are in the superbowl
"The Buffalo Bills have just exploded all over the Cincinnati Bangles"
-Steve Tasker-
Good Depth
Depth is great thing and as you mention the rest of the roster is lacking quality depth. One way to expand that depth into other areas of the team may be to trade one of the WRs. Looking at the list of WR I see 7 players, there were tons of injuries last year and it seem like every WR they put on the field played well. But there is not enough room on the roster for all of them, so it might be good to see what one of the may fetch on the market
I've got a feeling that Buffalo is going to the Super, er, going play hard and lose in a gutwrenching fashion -
WR was my favorite part of the 2011 Bills.
I loved this group. They all played above their hearts out. And to have UD RFA’s actually produce like they did… amazing.
I love these guys.
Lets Go Buff a lo!!!
And with Easily coming into the mix next year...
Oh man… these guys are going to be fun to watch grow together. I always forget about Easily…
Lets Go Buff a lo!!!
Easley has hugh potential
Living in CT and being a big UConn fan, I had the opportunity and pleasure to watch Easley every game but one of his senior season. This kid’s got incredible potential. IMO if he only reaches 80-90% of that potential, he could and should be an NFL caliber starter for years to come. He as that "knack" that some of the games top WR’s have to just get open. Combine that with his decent height, speed, and that set of hands I’ve seen, if he reaches full potential he’ll be a top notch No.1. I just hope he gets that opportunity, makes the most of it, and stays healthy.
With that, we have so much depth at the WR position, it almost convinces me we’ll pick AJ ant No.3
by billsfanct on Jan 28, 2011 1:13 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Thanks for that.
I never saw him play in school… so its nice to hear from a UConn fan.
Lets Go Buff a lo!!!
David Nelson
is the man to watch. He caught everything thrown his way. Great hands; quality person…..has a bright future.
Been a fan of Dvaid Nelson since camp/preseason 2010.
"‘Fight on my men,’ Sir Andrew said, ‘a little I’m hurt, but not yet slain.
I’ll just lie down and bleed a while then I’ll rise to fight again.’"
Totally agree
Nelson has deceptive speed with his long legs. He also is an extraordinary downfield blocker.
We’re always harping on the absence of a Tight end presence here at Buffalo Rumblings. I know I get caught up in it too. As great as a good all around TE can be, your offense doesn’t need one if you have the right WR’s. Parrish can’t block all that well, but I’m sure he can replace the TE as a pass receiver from the slot…. I think an effective Roscoe more than makes up for whatever the Bills are lacking at TE.
Some day the Bills won't suck anymore. Or they'll be in someone else's city.
David Nelson can fill some of that void as well.
And we’ll see what happens with Shawn Nelson in 2011. 2010 was a lost season for him.
"‘Fight on my men,’ Sir Andrew said, ‘a little I’m hurt, but not yet slain.
I’ll just lie down and bleed a while then I’ll rise to fight again.’"
And if you have a great TE
hell, even a decent, average, good, nonBillsdraftpick TE you can exploit teams game in and game out like teams did to the Bills almost every single week.
by twoeightnine on Jan 28, 2011 11:27 AM EST up reply actions
I just don’t see how you need a TE, besides size wise. David Nelson is pretty big. Just because he’s a WR doesn’t mean we couldn’t exploit teams game in and game out with him. Now that these young guys have a year in Gailey’s offense, we might just get the step forward we’ve been waiting for since Bledsoe was here….
Some day the Bills won't suck anymore. Or they'll be in someone else's city.
This is what I think also
This year we almost had to have a TE in to help block, but if we can fix the O-line to the extent that they are holding there own then Nelson can be in some even in the run game. My thing about having a TE in though is he is taking one of our WR’s off the field. IMO we help our run game out the most by having four WR’s in the game. The deffense has to counter that with an extra DB so now you start the play with smaller defenders on the field. If you use Nelson sort of as a TE slipping him into the middle underneath the LB’s then he gives you some extra blocking plus helps pull some coverage out of the middle.
I just really want to see Nelson on the field more this year not sitting on the bench behind Evans, Johnson, Parrish, and now a TE.
Please base your arguments in provable facts instead of pulling stuff out of your rear. -CanadianBillsFan- This is why talk is cheap because the supply always exceeds the demand.
Anyone know the extent of Easley's injury
how bad was it?
"The Buffalo Bills have just exploded all over the Cincinnati Bangles"
-Steve Tasker-
I think they said he was back
to lifting weights and running in like November. Anyone else know anything different?
Lets Go Buff a lo!!!
weird that they put him on IR
"The Buffalo Bills have just exploded all over the Cincinnati Bangles"
-Steve Tasker-
Not really, especially with not knowing how the injuries would plague the WR’s at the end of the year. Especially for a rather raw talent like Easley the safest move is to put him on IR and let him come back slowly, watch film, and pace himself. It also saves a roster spot for another guy. If he was runing / lifting in November, he probably might’ve only played the last couple of games…. Better to put him on the shelf and let him get stronger for next year.
Some day the Bills won't suck anymore. Or they'll be in someone else's city.
i suppose
it would have been nice to see him play at the end of the year over Roosevelt
"The Buffalo Bills have just exploded all over the Cincinnati Bangles"
-Steve Tasker-
It is until you realize it was like ten weeks into the season when he was running only in a straight line and not yet making cuts.
You can't have CHANGE without CHAN.
Tweet
Buffalo Rumblings
by MattRichWarren on Jan 28, 2011 7:58 PM EST up reply actions
It took him forever to run in a straight line because he had scar tissue. He should be 100% by camp.
You can't have CHANGE without CHAN.
Tweet
Buffalo Rumblings
by MattRichWarren on Jan 28, 2011 12:10 PM EST up reply actions
cant wait to go to camp this year
Fitz and a whole camp as a starter could be crazy good,
has he ever had that before? i dont think he has
"The Buffalo Bills have just exploded all over the Cincinnati Bangles"
-Steve Tasker-
You are right. He has been sooooo hit and miss, mostly miss, in camp. It’s why Trent was the starter last year.
You can't have CHANGE without CHAN.
Tweet
Buffalo Rumblings
by MattRichWarren on Jan 28, 2011 7:58 PM EST up reply actions
Adding Green is a luxury....THAT WE CAN'T AFFORD!
When you’re in the poorhouse, you shouldn’t be seriously considering luxuries. Given all our other needs, we shouldn’t use a #3 pick on a wide receiver when we’re pretty loaded with talent there already, as this article states. We did it last year with a running back – same scenario – I look at Spiller as a luxury pick then too .
IMHO, sometimes a little common sense should be used to temper the "taking the BPA" rule. We must take need into consideration, and there are plenty of them, just not wide receiver or running back. No wide receiver can catch a pass that isn’t thrown because the quarterback got hurried or sacked. Every running back needs a seam to run through, and no offensive player has any impact while sitting on the bench because the defense can’t get the other team’s offense off the field.
If Green is still on the board at #3, hopefully we can trade the pick, and get an extra body or two that we can use on the defensive side.
i love green, but have to agree with u bama geezer
i twould be like taking spiller, although green would actually contribute in a meaningful way
Me too
I also agree that Green would be a luxury pick at this point. We did that last year with Spiller. Two years in a row would be a big mistake.
I agree – big time wrs don’t win super bowls – can you name an elite receiver who has won a title in the last 10 years – maybe M Harrison but that was a lot of Manning
by Barman23 on Jan 28, 2011 12:21 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Santonio Holmes.
"Slowly all the roles we act out become our identity. And in the end we are what we pretend to be." - Jerry Cantrell.
He made a great catch but I wouldn’t call him elite like an Andre Johnson, Calvin Johnson, etc – point is that you need to be strong upfront and have a great QB to win titles…..you can away with decent wrs which we already have
by Barman23 on Jan 28, 2011 1:36 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
He made many great catches. No, I may not put him on the same level as Fitzgerald, Johnson, or Johnson, but he was a major factor of that Steelers offense, and at least in my opinion a major if not “the” major reason they beat the Cards.
"Slowly all the roles we act out become our identity. And in the end we are what we pretend to be." - Jerry Cantrell.
right
and that’s the reason the Steelers are where they are today without him..in last place…WAIT A MINUTE…they’re in the Super Bowl!!!! Man, how’d that happen??
Well, it has a lot to do with the fact that it’s two years later.
I don’t see your point, or lack thereof. What does the team’s current situation have to do with whether or not Santonio Holmes helped them win the Super Bowl?
"Slowly all the roles we act out become our identity. And in the end we are what we pretend to be." - Jerry Cantrell.
ok....
Rod Smith
Tory Holt
Isaac Bruce
Hines Ward
Cliff Branch
Randy Moss
Marvin Harrison
Went to my first "BB" meeting today... When I stood, introduced myself, and admitted I was a Billsaholic, the other members threw beer cans at me!!
don't know what happened there
Rod Smith
Torry Holt
Isaac Bruce
Hines Ward
Cliff Branch
Randy Moss
Santonio Holmes
Marvin Harrison
Went to my first "BB" meeting today... When I stood, introduced myself, and admitted I was a Billsaholic, the other members threw beer cans at me!!
IF Green is the best playmaking talent available at #3, the Bills should take him. Filling by need with 1st round picks is a luxury we can’t afford. Teams that pick based on need never make the leap forward. The first round is about finding great playmakers not average safeties. Again, if Green is that playmaker, so be it.
Some day the Bills won't suck anymore. Or they'll be in someone else's city.
BUT....
We’ve got playmaking talent at WR already. Pileing more on only takes away the opportunity to add playmaking talent where we need it. Hopefully we can trade down, still get a playmaker with the first round pick, AND get another with a second rounder. I never recommended to stay at #3 and reach, but to do what it takes to maximize the value of the total draft – and a luxury pick there doesn’t work.
100% Spot On
The Bills should be drafting a DE, LB, or QB with the #3 pick. We don’t need another CJ Spiller-type pick. If the Bills pick Green, I might suffer a heart attack.
Can someone please perform an exorcism on Tom Modrak before draft day. And then fire him.
but playing receiver is about more than numbers, and Evans was still the guy that opposing defenses sought to eliminate first.
So how exactly do the good WRs do it then? Opposing offenses try to eliminate them first yet they still put up numbers 2x-3x as good as Lee. Hell, Stevie Johnson’s season was better than Lee’s last 2 seasons combined.
Want to know how to eliminate Lee Evans? Make him run 5’ from the sideline instead of 3’ from the sideline.
I dont think there is an argument that he is in the Andre Johnson, Larry Fitz group of it doesnt matter how many people you put on him he makes catches receivers. However, what he does do is make teams game plan for him, roll a safety to his side of the field, and open up the opposite side of the field as well as the underneath routes for other players. Add in the fact that he can get deep still, and he still has a place on this team.
by Eric Murawski on Jan 28, 2011 11:47 AM EST up reply actions
How did Stevie Johnson do when Evans wasn’t in the lineup pulling away coverage from Johnson?
Just as well as he did with Evans in the lineup.
I like Evans on the team, but I’m under no illusion that he’s anything better than a decent #2 option.
Stevie did okay, but not as well.
Stevie had his 4-5-6 catches in the last 3 games of the season, but he never went over 100 yards again. Evans opens up a lot of zones and area in the middle of the field with how fast he can get vertical and make the safeties divide.
The Evans “haters” seem to be pretty unappreciative of what he does for this team when he’s not catching footballs. Not only that he always holds his blocks as long as possible. He does a lot of “dirty work” or unseen things that don’t show in the box score. Evans would be an asset to any team in the league.
"‘Fight on my men,’ Sir Andrew said, ‘a little I’m hurt, but not yet slain.
I’ll just lie down and bleed a while then I’ll rise to fight again.’"
Adding Green
Although I think the pick could certainly be used on other positions, I don’t have a problem with adding the best reciever prospect since calvin johnson so our roster. You wanna talk about a blue chip prospect? Green is, in my oppinion, the best player in this draft. If your the Bills, you gotta look at it and say, where can we add elite talent to our team? You stick Green in the mix, and we now have one of the most exciting young cores of talent in the league. Although you look at Detroit who not only has their young franchise qb, their elite dominating DT, and their beast reciever, and they are still not there yet…makes you wonder how far away we are by that logic haha
by BMWdrummerman777 on Jan 28, 2011 11:58 AM EST reply actions
i was so pumped on easely during otas
Like a nerd I was watching all the bills videos of practice highlights and easely had these catches that were insane how he could hold into the ball etc.
I hope we do not deal Evans then pickup a receiver in the draft. Pointless this year. I felt than the receiving core suffered a bit when lee was out because he does after a part of the defense. I could be wrong.
Fitz on first team needs to developed serious chemistry with lee Evans. And if lee is around still next season is guarantee they will.
by sketchydave on Jan 28, 2011 11:59 AM EST via mobile reply actions
Easley
Marcus went to UConn and was a stud without a good quarterback, so seeing as how the shills fit his college ways I am hoping he picks up where he left off. Also he didn’t have injury or major drop issues for us in college.
by UConnMRB on Jan 28, 2011 12:02 PM EST via mobile reply actions
- Bills (that’s funny that when I typed in ‘Bills’ on my iPhone it corrected it to print ‘shills’
by UConnMRB on Jan 28, 2011 12:04 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Got the same problem with my evo 4G. Lame.
by sketchydave on Jan 28, 2011 12:06 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
it should save Bills though and use it from now on
"The Buffalo Bills have just exploded all over the Cincinnati Bangles"
-Steve Tasker-
This is a solid unit
Yet pretty average.
We’ve all talked about Evans enough. He is what he is, a good deep threat that doesn’t really produce anywhere else on the field. Maybe he does pull some double teams and attention from other players, but how much longer will that last? The guy has to produce to keep teams honest, as well….
Not that I disagree with the tier ratings, but it seems odd to have Johnson and Nelson at the same level. Johnson is a guy that can make plays and will have big games. Nelson is a possession receiver without much big play ability. I think he has a limited ceiling, even if he is a good player. It just seems odd to have no delineation between the two. But that’s the nature of ratings and tiers.
It’ll be interesting to see if Easley develops into anything we can utilize on offense. The physical attributes are there, but will he make a smooth transition? At the very least, he should be fighting Donald Jones for the 5th WR spot if the team only keeps 5. Both should make the team if they keep 6, especially if Easley can prove his worth on Teams this summer. Jones has earned his.
I was actually surprised by Roosevelt. He doesn’t have the speed or quickness needed, but the guy made some nice catches. I think he’s probably going to remain 7th on the depth chart barring injury, however.
Many Bills fan like to say this position is set and it’d be a waste to add anybody. I disagree. It’s a solid group, with some potential, but there’s no elite player. It’s not a huge need, but it shouldn’t be discounted…
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
I don’t think you need an “elite” wide receiver to make it. I look at the Saints. They have a franchise QB, but no skill position player I consider to be “elite”. Yet, they still put up points in chunks, especially last year.
I think the sentiment that this position is “set” is the right one for right now. Can we win with these guys? Yes, I think we can. It’s a matter of better play from the other offensive positions.
"Slowly all the roles we act out become our identity. And in the end we are what we pretend to be." - Jerry Cantrell.
I disagree.........
the more studs you have on offense the better off you are against the Steelers, Ravens, Jets, Pats of the AFC……….they cant game plan around everyone.
The score dictated they pass
by norcaliangelsfan on Jan 28, 2011 1:26 PM EST up reply actions
Yup
Would be nice
As I said, we don’t need an elite WR, but nobody should consider this group set or discount adding a top caliber player here.
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Jan 28, 2011 1:35 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Plus its not the offense was all-worldly during the end of the year.......
I know the injuries started piling up…..but the team wasnt scoring a ton.
The score dictated they pass
by norcaliangelsfan on Jan 28, 2011 1:42 PM EST up reply actions
What the Bills need in general is talent, and the teams that draft talent over need seem to rise up in the NFL. I’m not too well versed on the prospects for the draft, so I don’t know who is better than who, but I’m sick of the Bills drafting need types too high and passing on actually talented guys at positions we’re “set” at. At least this past year should have shown management that we’re only set at the ‘Kyle Williams’ position and the ‘Eric Wood/Andy Levitre’ position
Other than that, time to pan for some draft gold!
Some day the Bills won't suck anymore. Or they'll be in someone else's city.
Yes, I agree that we need to add talent across the board. But if we go into next year with 9 capable WRs instead of the 7 we have now, but haven’t improved the LBers or the OLine, then we’ll go 4-12 again. We could have four elite WRs on the team, but at a certain point it just becomes unnecessary.
"Slowly all the roles we act out become our identity. And in the end we are what we pretend to be." - Jerry Cantrell.
I agree with your sentiments too. I think the Bills will have plenty of options at that spot so we should wait and see….. I like reading all of this draft stuff, but I don’t know how people really try to do mocks and stuff. Those things hurt my brain, especially because their always wrong. The pinnacle is the individual putting together all 7 rounds. Ouch. The SBNation mock is pretty good though, I can see how thats just a bunch of people having a fun time.
Some day the Bills won't suck anymore. Or they'll be in someone else's city.
If it comes at the expense of adding a top caliber player at a position where we need it more, then yes, I would like OBD to discount adding a top caliber player. That being said, if it doesn’t sacrifice anything, then of course they should add a top tier talent if they come across one. Every team in the league should do that at every position. That doesn’t mean that I we shouldn’t be content with the WRs we have now.
"Slowly all the roles we act out become our identity. And in the end we are what we pretend to be." - Jerry Cantrell.
I’m with you – in addition to the Saints, you can add the Steelers, Colts, Pats, Eagles – basically any playoff team this year – none of them had elite WRs….all the elite WRs are at home including Andre Johnson, Larry Fitz, Calvin Johnson, etc…rbs and wrs can be found later and don’t have to be elite
by Barman23 on Jan 28, 2011 2:03 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Roddy White? Reggie Wayne? Greg Jennings? Mike Wallace? Those receivers are #2-5 in the NFL this year in terms of receiving yards, and all made the playoffs.
They all had years similar to Steve Johnson, doesn’t mean I consider them (or him) “elite” at the WR position.
"Slowly all the roles we act out become our identity. And in the end we are what we pretend to be." - Jerry Cantrell.
Wayne and White were both All-Pro first team this year, ahead of Andre, Calvin, and Fitzgerald. I doubt either team makes the playoffs without them.
by Dr. Brackish Okun on Jan 28, 2011 5:34 PM EST up reply actions
Me too. But if the Bills had made playoffs, would that have made Johnson elite? I doubt it. The definition is broader than that.
"Slowly all the roles we act out become our identity. And in the end we are what we pretend to be." - Jerry Cantrell.
Being an all-pro is what makes you elite. It’s the defining characteristic of an all-pro player.
by Dr. Brackish Okun on Jan 30, 2011 7:05 PM EST up reply actions
i agree
We are good hear for atleast one more year too see if these guys continue to develope. They are all so young with exception of Evens and could really be set for a while.
"The Buffalo Bills have just exploded all over the Cincinnati Bangles"
-Steve Tasker-
Mythbusters
I just don’t see how you need a TE, besides size wise. David Nelson is pretty big. Just because he’s a WR doesn’t mean we couldn’t exploit teams game in and game out with him.
If you have access to the second Pats game, watch David Nelson get wounded by Jerod Mayo. Then watch us never test the middle of the field the rest of that game. That is why I want us to draft an elite all-around Tight End in the mold of Heath Miller or Greg Olsen. What a plus for Fitzpatrick to have a big safety valve in the middle.
by JapanJohn on Jan 29, 2011 12:39 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
Really nice group of WR's we have.
Especially for what we are paying for them. Evans is the only one making any money. Not to say that OBD wont have to chanege that, but for now this group is deep, and efficient. I really hope we dont draft Green. I will understand it if we do, but I would rather we did not. Evans is here for this year, but I could see him being traded next year if Easly developes well.
Please base your arguments in provable facts instead of pulling stuff out of your rear. -CanadianBillsFan- This is why talk is cheap because the supply always exceeds the demand.

by 































