FanPost

QB Rating+: A different way to look at a flawed statistic

It's obvious by now that quarterback rating is a flawed statistic. The poor statistic has been battered around a bit in the media and with good reason. With the changes to the passing game today it's pretty hard to see the value in a rating without any context. Oh sure, Tom Brady led the league with 111 passer rating this season, but is that historically good? Just alright? It's hard to tell.

Well, that's why I borrowed a concept from baseball and compared quarterback ratings to league average. In baseball the term ERA+ is thrown around a lot for pitchers, but it's basically a park adjusted ERA against league average. Well, in football there is no need for stadium adjustments - at least as far as we know right now - and thus we can just divide Quarterback Rating by League Average Quarterback Rating and a get a number that allows us to more accurately measure passers across seasons.

For instance, Brady's 111 rating was done in the context of an NFL season where the average passer rating for the entire league was 82.2, which is pretty high. Therefore his QB Rating+ would be (111/82.2*100) or 135.0. It turns out that's pretty good.

Here are the ten best QB Rating+ seasons of the past decade with their season, player and QB Rating+:

  1. 2004 - Peyton Manning (Ind.) 149.7
  2. 2007 - Tom Brady (NE) 144.9
  3. 2004 - Daunte Culpepper (Min.) 137.1
  4. 2010 - Tom Brady (NE) 135.0
  5. 2000 - Brian Griese (Den.) 135.0
  6. 2009 - Drew Brees (NO) 135.0
  7. 2000 - Trent Green (StL) 133.6
  8. 2005 - Peyton Manning (Ind.) 133.1
  9. 2002 - Chad Pennington (NYJ) 132.6
  10. 2001 - Kurt Warner (StL) 132.4

Ironically, 2009 Brett Favre is #11 on this list. He had a 107.4 raw quarterback rating that season, but only a 132.0 QB Rating+. Warner's 2001 season on the other hand was a 101.4, but the average quarterback rating has steadily risen from 76.2 in 2000 to 82.2 this season. That's a big difference.

Still, I think QB Rating+ is a good start in attempting to compare quarterbacks across eras and years instead of just looking at a statistic that has inflated as offenses have changed in complexion.

Just another great fan opinion shared on the pages of BuffaloRumblings.com.

X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior users will need to choose a permanent username, along with a new password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

I already have a Vox Media account!

Verify Vox Media account

Please login to your Vox Media account. This account will be linked to your previously existing Eater account.

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior MT authors will need to choose a new username and password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Buffalo Rumblings

You must be a member of Buffalo Rumblings to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Buffalo Rumblings. You should read them.

Join Buffalo Rumblings

You must be a member of Buffalo Rumblings to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Buffalo Rumblings. You should read them.

Spinner.vc97ec6e

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.

tracking_pixel_9341_tracker