Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: The Most Dangerous Division in Sports

Buffalo Bills Offensive Line Review: Right Tackle

Photo

When I'm faced with some unpleasant task I generally try to tackle the worst part of it first. Getting through the hardest (or lamest, as the case may be) makes the rest of the task seem somewhat less woeful. And so, as the first in a five-part series, let's take a masochistic look at the Buffalo Bills' right tackle position.

The Bills initially filled the right tackle slot with Cornell Green, a free agent refugee from the Oakland Raiders. Never mind that the Raiders had a terrible offensive line in 2009; we were assured that Green was the man. We were later informed that Green was injured and had been secretly been playing hurt all year long. I'm not sure I believe that a hale and hearty Green would have been any better than the playing-through-(alleged)-pain version. Nevertheless, Green played over five games before being pulled due to injury during the Jacksonville game, placed on IR, and was ultimately released.

Cordaro Howard, a rookie from Georgia Tech (where Chan Gailey had recently been head coach), was the first scrub to take the field at right tackle. Following a pair of poor performances in Baltimore and Kansas City, the Bills evidently realized that Howard wasn't the answer. However, not being sure who might be better at right tackle, Gailey began what I refer to as the yo-yo solution. He pulled a right tackle out of the game after a series or two and inserted another guy. Generally, this went on throughout the game, which I believed hurt the consistency of the line as a whole.

Star-divide

First up in the yo-yo rotation was Mansfield Wrotto. Perhaps less than anxious to try this at home, Gailey yanked Howard and Wrotto in and out of the game for a series here and a series there while playing in Toronto. Another Georgia Tech alum (and another point of annoyance for me - not because I have anything against Georgia Tech, just coaches who lock onto ‘their' guys), Wrotto had spent the first three years of his career in lovely Seattle. He had started five games and appeared in 16, though he started none and appeared in only two in 2010. That's not a successful career arc, so it's no wonder why Seattle let Wrotto go. Regardless, Wrotto was the starting right tackle until the Week 16 game against New England.

Erik Pears was picked up on waivers toward the end of the season. He had started 30 games prior to his stint in Buffalo, and appeared in 44. In his three years in Denver, he started 26 games and appeared in 32 - all in 2006 and 2007. 2008 saw no game appearances at all due to a non-football injury (appendectomy). He played 10 games at left tackle in 2006 and 16 at right tackle in 2007, so you can see why the Bills were interested. He had experience and was part of a unit that had success running the ball.

Here are the numbers for the season at right tackle:

Right Tackle Run Grades - 2010 Season
Week Player(s) Good Decent Bad Killed Grade
1 (MIA) C. Green 1 10 3 1 72.1
2 (@GB) C. Green 3 24 2 0 75.7
3 (@NE) C. Green 1 18 2 0 74.1
4 (NYJ) C. Green 1 9 1 0 75.0
5 (JAC) C. Green, C. Howard 1 17 2 0 74.0
7 (@BAL) C. Howard 1 28 3 2 73.8
8 (@KC) C. Howard 2 24 1 0 75.7
9 (CHI) C. Howard, M. Wrotto 0 15 3 2 71.7
10 (DET) M. Wrotto 4 24 5 3 74.4
11 (@CIN) M. Wrotto 3 16 2 0 76.0
12 (PIT) M. Wrotto 0 15 1 0 73.8
13 (@MIN) M. Wrotto 1 20 1 0 75.0
14 (CLE) M. Wrotto 4 28 8 1 73.0
15 (@MIA) M. Wrotto 1 21 4 0 72.7
16 (NE) M. Wrotto, E. Pears 3 8 1 0 78.3
17 (@NYJ) M. Wrotto, E. Pears 2 16 0 0 77.2
Totals 28 293 39 9 74.4
Right Tackle Pass Grades - 2010 Season
Week Player(s) Good Decent Bad Killed Sack Help Grade
1 (MIA) C. Green 0 26 14 2 1 5 68.0
2 (@GB) C. Green 0 22 5 0 0 0 71.3
3 (@NE) C. Green 0 26 5 1 0 2 71.8
4 (NYJ) C. Green 0 28 2 0 0 0 73.7
5 (JAC) C. Green, C. Howard 1 32 6 0 0 0 72.4
7 (@BAL) C. Howard 0 39 8 0 0 2 71.6
8 (@KC) C. Howard 0 47 12 3.5 2.5 1 70.9
9 (CHI) C. Howard, M. Wrotto 2 46 6 1 0 5 73.5
10 (DET) M. Wrotto 1 22 2 1 1 1 74.2
11 (@CIN) M. Wrotto 0 34 3 2 0 2 73.3
12 (PIT) M. Wrotto 4 41 5 0 0 0 74.6
13 (@MIN) M. Wrotto 0 21 6 2 0 4 70.6
14 (CLE) M. Wrotto 1 24 2 0 0 1 74.3
15 (@MIA) M. Wrotto 0 28 4 1 0.5 3 72.5
16 (NE) M. Wrotto, E. Pears 0 18 3 1 0 0 72.1
17 (@NYJ) M. Wrotto, E. Pears 1 26 2 1 0 2 74.3
Totals 10 480 85 15.5 5.0 28 72.4

To be honest, I had never looked at all of the right tackles as one amalgam. They're scrubpar! As a whole, Buffalo has seen run grades a full point below any full-time starter at any other line position. Bear in mind that Buffalo has faced a lot of 3-4 fronts this season, meaning that the right tackle has most often gone against a linebacker or large defensive end (275-285 range typically), while the centers and guards have been facing behemoth nose tackles, albeit with assistance some of the time. The low pass protection grade is another thing that needs to be addressed; a screw-up on one of every six pass plays does tend to lower a score.

By way of comparison, the jettisoned Langston Walker - though hardly elite - managed a run grade of 76.0% in 2008. More impressively, he killed just four plays compared to the 15.5 killed by Buffalo's 2010 right tackles. On passing downs, he needed a little less help (20 snaps) than the scrubs who closed out 2010 (28). My point is not that Buffalo should bring back Walker so much as the situation hasn't improved since his departure. Injuries and incompetence plagued right tackle in 2009, and 2010 turned out to be more of the same. The turnstile (pun intended) approach to right tackle has got to change if the Bills are to find consistent success in 2011. Mere scrubs have proven not to be the answer for two straight campaigns. Via the draft or free agency, Buffalo needs to bring in someone who can bring starting caliber consistency to the position.

And, yeah, it was a pain in the arse to compile all of those stats. Have I mentioned that I hate the yo-yo approach that Gailey seems to favor?

Comment 52 comments  |  7 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Thanks Ron

for another outstanding analysis. This is an infuriating and constant source of aggravation for me. This situation is/was not hidden in the dark. We all knew it. Yet, Chix was willing to jeopardize the performance of the entire offense to run their scrub-speriment instead of fixing it once and properly. I know the poll(s) will be up later, but, this is why I cannot approve. IMO, your description of the RT position extends to CHIX …i.e.

They’re scrubpar!

What we call our despair is often only the painful eagerness of unfed hope.

by fansince60 on Jan 4, 2011 8:17 AM EST reply actions  

The Bills will probably draft Derek Hall at RT. After seeing his performance at the Orange Bowl, he’s exactly who I expect the Bills to take.

by Krenn on Jan 4, 2011 8:21 AM EST reply actions  

Rec'd
And, yeah, it was a pain in the arse to compile all of those stats.

Simply for that alone. Basically though you could have forgone all of this and stated the obvious:

To be honest, I had never looked at all of the right tackles as one amalgam. They’re scrubpar! As a whole, Buffalo has seen run grades a full point below any full-time starter at any other line position.

You bring up a good point in Langston Walker, as much as I loathed the idea of switching him to LT, I didn’t understand the rationale of his release. He should have never been put at LT and was set up for failure. I guess that is that was during the previous regime’s massive downfall (releasing the OC right before the season,etc.).

Like you said this position needs to be addressed, enough lip service Nix, get us some talent at the tackle position, and by talent I don’t mean street free agents.

"...You play to win the game. Hello? You play to win the game. You don't play it to just play it. That's the great thing about sports: you play to win, and I don't care if you don't have any wins. You go play to win. When you start tellin' me it doesn't matter, then retire. Get out! 'Cause it matters." ~ Herm Edwards

"Talk's cheap. We all know that. It's like I've always said: 'Don't tell me about the labor pains, just show me the baby.' " ~ Buddy Nix

by Jason from OH-IO on Jan 4, 2011 8:36 AM EST reply actions  

Ron – what’s your outlook for Wrotto, Pears, and Howard? Are they all backups at best? Do any have a real chance at developing into a starter, and if so, what position?

by Pistol on Jan 4, 2011 8:44 AM EST reply actions  

I’m not Ron, but I feel compelled to say this: Wrotto and Howard should be playing guard. They belong inside on a zone-blocking team, where their quickness and lack of power better suits them. They have no business on this football team if the goal really is to get more physical.

Editor-in-Chief, BUFFALO RUMBLINGS®
@BrianGalliford

by Brian Galliford on Jan 4, 2011 8:54 AM EST up reply actions  

They belong inside on a zone-blocking team, where their quickness and lack of power better suits them

A couple of years too late to save Jauron! Hahaha maybe they can actually cut block.

Some day the Bills won't suck anymore. Or they'll be in someone else's city.

by syrbillsfan on Jan 4, 2011 9:11 AM EST up reply actions  

Pears

Pears can serve as a back up at best. I agree with Brian on the other two, although I think Howard actually played pretty well at guard, he had to win the reserve job in camp and was a dark horse at that time. He probably deserves to be a backup in the NFL, but like Brian said, not on a team that wants to get big/physical.

"...You play to win the game. Hello? You play to win the game. You don't play it to just play it. That's the great thing about sports: you play to win, and I don't care if you don't have any wins. You go play to win. When you start tellin' me it doesn't matter, then retire. Get out! 'Cause it matters." ~ Herm Edwards

"Talk's cheap. We all know that. It's like I've always said: 'Don't tell me about the labor pains, just show me the baby.' " ~ Buddy Nix

by Jason from OH-IO on Jan 4, 2011 9:23 AM EST up reply actions  

I’d be stunned if Howard is back and at least surprised if Wrotto returns. Their Georgia Tech ties to Gailey got them in the door but neither was competent at right tackle. Whether they’d be better suited at guard isn’t relevant in Buffalo as the Bills have better interior starting and depth options. I thought Pears would be back through camp at least even before seeing Gailey’s comments about him.

It can always get worse. Let me tell you how.

by Ron From NM on Jan 4, 2011 9:25 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Wrotto is a UFA according to Chris Brown at BuffaloBills.com. If he’s back it’ll be on the cheap.

You can't have CHANGE without CHAN.
Tweet
Buffalo Rumblings

by MattRichWarren on Jan 4, 2011 12:02 PM EST up reply actions  

Cheap and not on the 53 man roster. I figure that’s the Bills will carry three OTs in 2011: Bell, Pears and a Guy who will be added in free agency or the draft. Levitre will be the emergency swing tackle.

It can always get worse. Let me tell you how.

by Ron From NM on Jan 4, 2011 12:06 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Pears?

Why, because he did “as good as can be expected”?

"...You play to win the game. Hello? You play to win the game. You don't play it to just play it. That's the great thing about sports: you play to win, and I don't care if you don't have any wins. You go play to win. When you start tellin' me it doesn't matter, then retire. Get out! 'Cause it matters." ~ Herm Edwards

"Talk's cheap. We all know that. It's like I've always said: 'Don't tell me about the labor pains, just show me the baby.' " ~ Buddy Nix

by Jason from OH-IO on Jan 4, 2011 1:39 PM EST up reply actions  

Pears ddidnt prove himself to be a liability. Wrotto and Howard did.

It can always get worse. Let me tell you how.

by Ron From NM on Jan 4, 2011 3:15 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

So we’re loosing our Wang? :-(

The Buffalo Bills, finding new and exciting ways to lose since January 8th, 2000.

by CanadianBillsFan on Jan 4, 2011 5:31 PM EST up reply actions  

I don’t know practice squad eligibility rules. If Buffalo can stash him there he might remain a Bill. Given that he couldn’t start for Buffalo the odds of anyone else pouncing on him seem remote.

It can always get worse. Let me tell you how.

by Ron From NM on Jan 4, 2011 6:01 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

That's what I was thinking too.

Personally I’d like to keep him around and see how we can develop him. Plus the available jokes that we have by keeping him around make it worth it.

The Buffalo Bills, finding new and exciting ways to lose since January 8th, 2000.

by CanadianBillsFan on Jan 4, 2011 6:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Since Wang was on the Bills active roster for a year he can’t be on the practice squad. At least that’s my understanding.

You can't have CHANGE without CHAN.
Tweet
Buffalo Rumblings

by MattRichWarren on Jan 5, 2011 9:47 AM EST up reply actions  

And Hang or Rinehart.

It can always get worse. Let me tell you how.

by Ron From NM on Jan 4, 2011 3:16 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Oh right, I guess I wasn’t considering Hang for the position. But I guess switching him over and leaving Wodd at Center is definitely a possibility.

by stetzwebs on Jan 4, 2011 3:56 PM EST up reply actions  

Well Hang was a RG before he was a centre.

The Buffalo Bills, finding new and exciting ways to lose since January 8th, 2000.

by CanadianBillsFan on Jan 4, 2011 6:09 PM EST up reply actions  

That is true, I had forgotten that.

by stetzwebs on Jan 4, 2011 7:03 PM EST up reply actions  

I suspect that Hang isn’t quite the mauler that Gailey would prefer.

It can always get worse. Let me tell you how.

by Ron From NM on Jan 4, 2011 7:44 PM EST up reply actions  

Agreed, but he is good enough of a centre/guard to either be our starting RG our top backup interior lineman next season.

The Buffalo Bills, finding new and exciting ways to lose since January 8th, 2000.

by CanadianBillsFan on Jan 4, 2011 9:22 PM EST up reply actions  

I can’t imagine any scenario in which Hang would not be on the 53 man roster in 2011. I just see Gailey wanting a more physical presence, meaning that Hang would be a backup.

It can always get worse. Let me tell you how.

by Ron From NM on Jan 4, 2011 10:01 PM EST up reply actions  

Agreed again, but I don’t think that we have anyone better than Hang to start at RG right now. At least not until Urbik gets better at defending the pass. Once he does though then our interior line should be Levitre-Wood-Urbik with Hang being the top backup at all three positions. Although i don’t think that that happens until midway threw next season.

Either it’s good to know that at least our interior line is set for the next few seasons, now we just need to find some damn tackles!

The Buffalo Bills, finding new and exciting ways to lose since January 8th, 2000.

by CanadianBillsFan on Jan 4, 2011 10:21 PM EST up reply actions  

This is fodder for the Buddy Nix thread.

by Rick A on Jan 4, 2011 9:08 AM EST reply actions  

You’re only getting Chan Gailey’s today. Too much other stuff going on.

Editor-in-Chief, BUFFALO RUMBLINGS®
@BrianGalliford

by Brian Galliford on Jan 4, 2011 9:29 AM EST up reply actions  

Good post

While I agree about being concerned with a coach “who locks onto ‘their’ guys” – at least Gailey/Nix didn’t just keep"their" guys in without trying new answers at the position.

I’d be more concerned if Gailey and Nix didn’t clearly evaluate players (as you have) because of personal ties. Evidence of the fact they don’t IMO is found with the end of year statement by Chan regarding Eric Pears.

by DJ O on Jan 4, 2011 11:03 AM EST reply actions  

Yep…not one but two Georgia Tech alums were discarded….but only after being given the opportunity to fail the team.

It can always get worse. Let me tell you how.

by Ron From NM on Jan 4, 2011 12:08 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Have I mentioned that I hate the yo-yo approach that Gailey seems to favor?

Why ron? It brings you more work?

Just kidding man, great job as always. And as I’ve been saying since day one, WE SHOULD HAVE NEVER RELEASED WALKER!

The Buffalo Bills, finding new and exciting ways to lose since January 8th, 2000.

by CanadianBillsFan on Jan 4, 2011 11:11 AM EST reply actions  

Do you know why they released Walker.

I have no idea myself, but I believe it is a safe bet that there were circumstances that forced the issue. Trade Peters, put Walker (alot of money) on the left side in a no huddle and then cut him just before the season starts. If that doesn’t spell circumstances outside the best interest in the team at the time nothing does. I agree we would of been better off with his level of play compared to what we have had, but these things don’t happen without significant reason. Did we know Butler was going to retire?

WE SHOULD HAVE NEVER RELEASED WALKER!

This quote is obvious unless all the facts are known. Now if you want to say we should of addressed tackle in the past offseason more so than Wang, we would all agree, or an arguement could be made that we should of tried to keep Jonathan Scott.

YOU ARE OUT of you kuku fufu mine craker laker Flaber baber FUNKI chunki brain. WE want to winn every year -- abayarde

by VanScottM on Jan 4, 2011 11:49 AM EST up reply actions  

My take on it (and I have no inside info) was that Walker pitched a fit when asked to do something he knew he wasn’t capable of doing. His less than stellar attitude about flipping to LT didn’t sit well with Jauron, who was increasingly unhappy with the offense and Turk “Clock management isn’t important” Schonert. Insatead of admitting the error and apologizing to Walker he chose to jettison a Guy who had been a decent right tackle for the Bills.

It can always get worse. Let me tell you how.

by Ron From NM on Jan 4, 2011 12:13 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

and within a week they were both gone.

Followed by Jaroun two months later. All I am saying is there had to be alot of behind the scenes activity.

YOU ARE OUT of you kuku fufu mine craker laker Flaber baber FUNKI chunki brain. WE want to winn every year -- abayarde

by VanScottM on Jan 4, 2011 12:29 PM EST up reply actions  

plus they wanted brad butler to play RT and did not want to pay Walker to be a backup, which spectacularly blew up in their faces when Butler got injured

"Sharks are as tough as those football fans who take their shirts off during games in Chicago in January, only more intelligent." DAVE BARRY

"You are drunk, sir!" "And you are ugly, madame! But I will be sober in the morning!"

by gregeng on Jan 4, 2011 1:06 PM EST up reply actions  

in my guess, its all on Jauron being on the hotseat

He was a coach who was already on the verge of losing his job. He was desperate and was not willing to admit the mistake he made with Langston Walker to desperately avoid losing the locker room. Jauron in his last gasps as a failed head coach here had no contingency plan for trading this teams LT and getting rid of our RT. At least he gave us Wood and Levitre

The league should reward us with a compensatory 1st round pick for ending the Farve misery story. - wab2

by poz on Jan 4, 2011 1:56 PM EST up reply actions  

But who would have made a mockery of Jauron for moving Walker back to RT? It was an experiment and it didn’t work. It was necessary during camp, and he looked okay doing it, sure. We’re all well aware how camp and preseason mean little to an individual’s success in the regular season (Spiller and an undefeated Lions preseason team come to mind).

Jauron really messed @#$% up doing what he did here. He wrote his own sentencing.

In the year two thousaaaaaaand.
In the year two thousAAAAAAND!

Current song recommendation: Ween "Mr. Richard Smoker"

by TheAfghanTwilight on Jan 4, 2011 2:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Camp was the time for Jauron to get Bell ready to play LT instead of creating a hole at RT in the hope that the oft injured Butler could fill it. He didn’t do that and he blew the last HC gig he will ever have.

It can always get worse. Let me tell you how.

by Ron From NM on Jan 4, 2011 3:40 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Camp was the time for Jauron to get Bell ready to play LT instead of creating a hole at RT in the hope that the oft injured Butler could fill it. He didn’t do that and he blew the last HC gig he will ever have.

It can always get worse. Let me tell you how.

by Ron From NM on Jan 4, 2011 3:40 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Ron a big thanks for your hard work through out the year!

Your posts give us such good insight to the core of our offense.

REC’D!!!

Please base your arguments in provable facts instead of pulling stuff out of your rear. -CanadianBillsFan- This is why talk is cheap because the supply always exceeds the demand.

by jbbillfan on Jan 4, 2011 11:22 AM EST reply actions  

I second that

Always look fwd to your weekely analysis

by dgrid on Jan 4, 2011 11:25 AM EST up reply actions  

Is this the only SBN NFL blog to have such in-depth line analysis?

In the year two thousaaaaaaand.
In the year two thousAAAAAAND!

Current song recommendation: Ween "Mr. Richard Smoker"

by TheAfghanTwilight on Jan 4, 2011 2:36 PM EST up reply actions  

Maybe. Occasionally a lead blogger comes to Rumblings when their team plays the Bills and comments about wanting someone to do something similar for their site.

It can always get worse. Let me tell you how.

by Ron From NM on Jan 4, 2011 3:35 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Oh, and I hope Nix makes your job easier next year by closing that revolving door.

Maybee Chan can then throw away the yo yo.

Please base your arguments in provable facts instead of pulling stuff out of your rear. -CanadianBillsFan- This is why talk is cheap because the supply always exceeds the demand.

by jbbillfan on Jan 4, 2011 11:27 AM EST reply actions  

Awesome job, Ron.

You can't have CHANGE without CHAN.
Tweet
Buffalo Rumblings

by MattRichWarren on Jan 4, 2011 11:56 AM EST reply actions  

Great series Ron

looking forward to the rest.

This is just abysmal and is incredibly indicative of a tackle situation which is up there with LB as the most important area that needs to be fixed. Our RTs were all failures this year, every single one. I hope none of them are brought back. What a shame that through it all neither Kyle Calloway nor Ed Wang could jump in there to try their stuff – or that Calloway could do nothing at all. I wouldn’t be opposed to drafting 3 OTs in this draft if we need to.

The league should reward us with a compensatory 1st round pick for ending the Farve misery story. - wab2

by poz on Jan 4, 2011 2:02 PM EST reply actions  

Wow, fantastic work, Ron...

I don’t have much to add, other than I agree in disliking the yo-yo approach too. Maybe they shouldn’t bring Walker back, but I firmly believe they should never have let him go. I wonder if Gailey would have done it in the first place.

In the year two thousaaaaaaand.
In the year two thousAAAAAAND!

Current song recommendation: Ween "Mr. Richard Smoker"

by TheAfghanTwilight on Jan 4, 2011 2:32 PM EST reply actions  

My guess is that Gailey would have left Walker at right tackle and been happy to focus on areas of clear deficiency. Walker was big and strong, though with an accompanying lack of nimbleness.

It can always get worse. Let me tell you how.

by Ron From NM on Jan 4, 2011 3:33 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Don’t forget that they planned to do that same thing with Brad Butler.

Editor-in-Chief, BUFFALO RUMBLINGS®
@BrianGalliford

by Brian Galliford on Jan 4, 2011 3:53 PM EST up reply actions  

I was a big Butler fan but his eaxtensive injury history was a concern….apparently so much so to Butler himself that he retired.

It can always get worse. Let me tell you how.

by Ron From NM on Jan 4, 2011 4:09 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Repetitious

But great info, thks Ron.

" All that 8-8 means for a team that needs a QB upgrade is your to good for your own good." Bob Dicesare.

by buffalobacker on Jan 4, 2011 10:25 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

SB Nation's home for all things Buffalo Bills.
Community Guidelines :: Essential BR

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Bills_small
An Exploration of Ryan Fitzpatrick's TDs and INTs
Small
Beyond the Perfect Offseason: Where Do We Go From Here?
Dsc00843_small
NFL Divisional Record And Playoff Berth Correlation, 2002-2011

Recent FanPosts

Small
Who Will be the Number 2?
Spikes_small
Remaining Free Agents
04_buffalo_bills_football_coloring_at_coloring-pages-book-for-kids-boys_small
Mock 2012 Season
Small
The Return of the Running Back(s): Revisiting the Road to the Super Bowl
Small
Difference Between A "Franchise" QB and an "Elite" One
303857_872291743296_10504698_40499694_6362492_n_small
Be A Little Nicer Please, Bills Fans  :)
Cyclops1-12nd7cv_small
Current QB Wins
Small
The Count-Down to the Right Numbers
Bruuuuce_small
Ranking All 32 NFL Starting QB's : Who is ELITE?
Snapshot_20120113_small
Next Stop: 3rd Generation of Winners

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Screen_shot_2012-03-07_at_6 Brian Galliford

100_2488_small MattRichWarren

Authors

Range_march_2011_small Ron From NM

Slide1_small Der Jaeger

Moderators

Sucks_small Kurupt

Mrsinister03_small sireric

Cordy_small poz