Giants 27, Bills 24: Three Good And Three Bad
The Buffalo Bills missed an opportunity to enter their bye week 5-1. The Bills were game, but in the end couldn't overcome mistakes to win on Sunday.
The Bad
Pass Defense. Problems versus the pass started up front earlier in the year, and now they include most of the defense. George Edwards didn't have Shawne Merriman on the field on Sunday; Merriman is one of two capable Bills edge rushers. Arthur Moats is the other. Moats needed to be on the field a lot more than he was, as Buffalo hurried Manning plenty but couldn't track him down. Moats had the team's only quarterback hit. No one is consistently getting to the quarterback, and the cornerbacks are playing worse by the week. Last year, Drayton Florence selected the first Jets game to lay an egg. Yesterday was one of those games. I lost count of his pass interference penalty count. I'll beat this drum again: Buffalo needs an edge rusher and a cornerback with their first two picks next April. Buffalo is solidifying inside the tackle box, but is still weak on the edges, and Eli Manning took advantage of this.
Ryan Fitzpatrick's Fade Route Passes. We'll talk about the other 28 Fitzpatrick passes in the next section. This section will focus on two. It's easy to focus on the interceptions, but they had more meaning than just the picks. The first of the two came on Buffalo's second drive in third quarter. Buffalo squandered the second half opening drive, and the Giants scored on their next drive. Fitzpatrick and the Bills needed to answer, and their ensuing drive gained a first down, with a 2nd-and-4 at the Bills 41. Fitzpatrick under-threw Stevie Johnson, and Corey Webster intercepted the ball. The second pass was a near mirror image of the first. Johnson was open, but Fitzpatrick again under-threw the ball. With defenses looking to compress the Bills' offense, Buffalo has to try these types of passes. If Buffalo's offense is going to continue to find room to operate, Fitzpatrick needs to complete these passes - or, at a minimum, they need to fall long and incomplete.
Compression Of The Buffalo Offense. Chan Gailey seems to have a short list of plays that he goes to: tunnel screen, spread comebacks, receiver bubble screen, Wildcat dive, etc. Buffalo breaks a couple of these plays each game. Buffalo's passing game, however, is becoming less and less explosive as the season wears on. Buffalo had three plays of over 20 yards on Sunday, and one was a run. Fitzpatrick's room for error in the short passing game is small. He's delivered, so far. This compression started to affect Fred Jackson on Sunday. If his 80-yard touchdown run is taken out, Jackson ran 15 times for 41 yards, and a 2.7 yards-per-carry average. Buffalo desperately needs to stretch the field vertically, or risk losing the advantages that they get from spreading it horizontally.
The Good
Fitzpatrick And The Passing Game. Fitzpatrick's day minus the two inceptions: 21-of-28, 244 yards and twotouchdowns. Other than Naaman Roosevelt's touchdown and David Nelson's seam route catch on the second-to-last drive, Fitzpatrick cut up the Giants' defense in the shorter zones. Defenses are forcing Fitzpatrick to beat them underneath the coverage, where the passing windows are smaller and there is smaller room for error. Fitzpatrick's accuracy has been good and his decision making solid, keeping Buffalo drives alive. For the most part, the receivers held up to their end of the bargain. Nelson and Johnson played well, and C.J. Spiller's moonlighting as a deep outside receiver paid some dividends as well.
Play Calling. Buffalo couldn't help but give up some plays to the Giants' front four. That group is simply too good not to create havoc. Even with Justin Tuck hurt, Perry Fewell had three talented rushers to throw at Fitzpatrick. The Giants did record three sacks, but that's a low number comparatively. Gailey called a bunch of three-step drop, rhythm pass combinations early, used the screen in just the right amount, and took advantage of relatively weak Giants linebackers. Spiller on the outside added the speed threat Buffalo needed. 24 points against New York, without any turnovers from the defense, is a good day.
Improved Run Defense. The operable word here is "improved." Buffalo certainly didn't do well on Sunday. George Edwards' group gave up 123 yards on the ground when the Giants entered the game averaging 83 rushing yards a game. Coming into Sunday, the Giants averaged 23 called runs and 33 called passes per game. Kevin Gilbride called eight more runs to get to 123 yards, not counting Manning's kneel-downs, for a 3.9 yards-per-carry average. Seems good for the Giants until compared to what Buffalo had been giving up. Buffalo had been giving up 138 yards on the ground per game on 25 carries, for a 5.5 average per rush. While not stellar, Buffalo improved against a concerted ground game by a team that has shown it can run well in the past. Baby steps.
Outlook
There are no moral victories out of losses. This loss looks a bit different though. Last year, Buffalo was the team that played big and came up just short. Versus Cincinnati, Buffalo seemed to let up. This loss was neither. New York didn't allow Buffalo to stay in the game through its own mistakes. Buffalo didn't play poorly. Buffalo was the team that made enough mistakes to lose.
That may seem too nuanced of a change to take note of, but it's important. Buffalo wasn't the underdog team the favorite allowed into the game. Buffalo traded blows with a ten-win-type of team and gave the game to the opponent. Buffalo is going to have these types of games in the coming weeks against the Jets, Cowboys, and Patriots, at a minimum. The Bills' ability to trade blows and win in the end will punch their ticket to the playoffs.
For now, Buffalo has two weeks off. That time is needed to heal the injured, manufacture a pass rush, and stretch the field vertically on offense. Then it's back to business versus the Redskins as the Bills seek their first regular season win in Toronto on October 30.
64 comments
|
5 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
3rd pick of the draft
A receiver that can stretch the field.
by telka on Oct 17, 2011 9:15 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
His name is Marcus Easly
But I agree if Marcus is done past this year.
Don’t want to turn this into a draft heavy post but our weaknesses are still all on the defensive side of the ball. Our pass rush is terrible, this needs to be our first pick.
Yeah, the problem this week was Stevie WAS beating his man and Fitz missed him. Not sure this week is the week to claim we need another receiver to not get the ball to.
I have low expectations. But high hopes.
by greysquirrel on Oct 17, 2011 11:36 AM EDT up reply actions
Agreed on all accounts.
Thanks again, DJ.
"Slowly all the roles we act out become our identity. And in the end we are what we pretend to be." - Jerry Cantrell.
Excellent read. Boy I hope Fitzy starts driving the fade off his front fit instead of his back foot. I an a huge Fitzy backer but Manning dropped long throws into the bucket all day long. It is eye opening to watch a top QB in terms of throwing ability play vs. Fitz. That said, I like everything else about Fitz and believe he will work to improve in that area. He played very well minus the bad sacks and ints.
by WhatGoesAround on Oct 17, 2011 9:23 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
Fitz is good.
Fitz is a good quarterback. He hits some long throws and he misses some long throws. He is very accurate in short and mid routes. Every quarterback in the league is inconsistent some of the time (see Eli, Vick, even Brady); those who are head and shoulders above Fitz have a lot more toys to play with and do not have a bunch of tackles crippled in front of them. Not making excuses, just saying. Hell, both Farve and Kelly drove me crazy occasionally. I’ll keep Fitz, thanks.
I agree
my fear with Fitz has always been that “ooops moment” where he seems to have an arm cramp.
The critical throw that is wild high, in the dirt, or to a different colored jersey. He’s smart, a game manager, and so on, but, the “ooops moments” seem to come at inopportune times. The second interception was the inopportune time.
You can fault the play call( I would have run Fred 2X, drained some time, then threw this route) but, he’s a pro QB and you need to execute whatever is called. He plays well enough most of the time, just not well enough all the time. That in-between time is a killer.
This team is making me skeptical of my skepticism- putting the crow in the oven to slow roast.
Glad to see.....
I’m glad to see that we are not jumping off a cliff over a loss. Let’s face it 4-2 going in to the bye week is pretty good. I’m willing to bet that at the beginning of the season and after all of the injuries we’ve had and good players on IR already that no one would have guessed we would be 4-2 at this point. We definitely need a pass rusher and deep threat in the future but it is starting to come together. Can’t fix all problems in one year. Moats should definitely be on the field more and so should Shepperd. Andra Davis was having a terrible time in coverage. I know he is a great leader especially in the locker room but I think Sheppard needs to play over him. Any thoughts on that?
Davis is quite slow. Did he get benched for Sheppard after the first series? I tried to take notice but got caught up in the game and forgot to check this. If Sheppard isn’t outplaying Davis by 2 snaps to 1 or more, this needs to start. Davis is not a starting ILB anymore and Buffalo needs to see if Shep can fill this role before next season.
Davis and Sheppard play 2 different positions.
Davis is a thumper playing the Mike backed up by Morrison while Sheppard is the Will backing up Barnett. Sheppard isn’t a thumper so he’s not going to take Davis’ snaps unless they move him to the Mike
11 years of losing has taught me just a smidge of humility. - k8
Shep was in w/ Barnett at same time, at least last week. Not sure about this week tho.
And that was in Nickel formation, I believe.
Seems like he’s on the field more & more over last few weeks.
Carrington at OLB
Wasn’t Carrington supposed to provide an edge rush?
Thought Batten played well in run defense. So did McGee, especially early in the game.
Liked Spiller at WR, but would like to see him add some Josh Reed nastiness. As an RB, he should be able to muscle DB’s. Maybe run a reverse or two with him. Bills faked a couple of reverses during the game, it appeared they could have gone well the way the Giants pursued the actual run.
I think we need a RT in the first or second round and a pass rusher in the way they do not get the RT
Season to BILLieve!
by mroy1239 on Oct 17, 2011 10:05 AM EDT via iPhone app reply actions
Great Game
Sad to see Buffalo lose. But even in a loss they proved they are a quality team. The Giants are a good, solid team and Buffalo traded blows and played them evenly throughout the entire game. It came down to the last couple of drives and if Fitz gets just a little more air on the interception an open Johnson catches the winning score.
The Bills are not a ‘great’ team, but they are playoff quality and showed it. They have flaws, just like all teams, but if they can continue to work on those weaknesses and get back and keep their health they have as good a shot as anybody at a playoff spot.
It was also interesting looking at the standings at the end of yesterday. Buffalo’s opponents continue to have stronger and stronger records. Their losses are to a pair 4-2 teams, and they’ve beaten a 5-1, two 4-2, a decent 2-4, and a 2-3. Pretty tough schedule and they have more than held their own.
Tough stretch coming up, and I’m excited to watch it. Win or lose this Bill’s team is a blast to watch and root for.
Compression Of The Buffalo Offense
Chan Gailey seems to have a short list of plays that he goes to: tunnel screen, spread comebacks, receiver bubble screen, Wildcat dive, etc. Buffalo breaks a couple of these plays each game. Buffalo’s passing game, however, is becoming less and less explosive as the season wears on.
Totally agree with this. I started thinking in the Cincy game that Chan was getting a little too reliant on repeating the same sort of shtick over and over. It’s too early to call it Jauron-esque, but I reserve the right to label it that in about 2 months.
That said, I’m thrilled to be going into the Bye Week at 4-2. After the win against the Patriots, I speculated that if we could get 2 out of 3 from the Eagles/Giants/Jets, and at least 1 from the Bengals/Redskins, we’ll be at 6-2 and in a pretty good place. I still stand by that assessment. If we can beat the Redskins (probably likely) and the Jets (who knows), I’ll be even more thrilled.
Jets game will be tough I think. They’re having a bad season but that also means they may be very motivated to win a HUGE divisional game against the Bills. They’re a deeply flawed team but have great talent in many spots. Can the Bills take advantage of their struggling line? That’s the big question to me because, obviously, it is a weakness vs weakness thing.
I believe the Redskins are going to go on a downward spiral after Grossman “showed his true self”.
Out strengths play into...
…the Jets’ weaknesses, in my mind. If we can crank out some of the big explosive plays that we’ve done so far this year, I think that can take advantage of their “flaws” very nicely.
If only there was a way...
If only there was a way to help the Bills stretch the field this season by adding another probowl type WR?
Brandon Lloyd. He’d have looked good in a Bills uniform. So he’ll probably end up in an AFC East winning Patriots uniform.
But hey, at least we’ll still have that mid-3rd round pick in next year’s draft.
Is that necessarily a bad thing? They aren’t winning the Super Bowl this season. A 3rd round pick may well be the answer at a key need going forward. Lloyd would, if I’m not mistaken, be a free agent after this season. They may as well have kept Lee if they want to dump a pick on a guy for half a season. Jones will be back for the stretch run, at least. I understand your frustration because Lloyd would be a nice fit, but I wouldn’t be upset if they choose to keep an eye on next season and onward.
Lloyd is heading to the St. Louis Rams.
by PineWoodsBillsFan on Oct 17, 2011 1:27 PM EDT up reply actions
Good Read, Good Game, we did not deserve to win yet we lost by a field goal late in the game.
Also, on the road which is a point of interest that this team will soon need to address. If we do go to the playoffs there could inevitably be a road game. One thing I want to mention though?
Arthur Moats, played well at OLB but he is not ready to replace any of our starters. There is a growing desire to see him on the field alot more. Everytime one of the staff members write something about this kid it grows even more. I like Moats, he has that willingness to leave it all out there every play and every game. He is not Chris Kelsay and he is not a Sean Merriman and there is a huge gap between Arthur Moats and those other two guys. The gap between our starting OLB’s and our depth OLB’s is still large. I am hopefull that this gap narrows over the next two years and I honestly feel it will take this season and part of next season to fill that gap. This team lacks a pass rush and the void could be filling a spot between our starters and our depth players and that could come in the first two rounds of next years draft or it could come from FA before the kickoff of next season. Arthur Moats and Danny Batten are very good young players but they should not be confused with the seasoned veterans that play this position.
We lost this game we didn’t get beat, if that makes sense. We still played competitively without our starting NT, our back up NT was limited in PT and our two starting OLB’s were out. We should of owned Eli Manning for the most part, the giants OLine isn’t anything to fear, yet we didn’t get a hand on Manning, pressure on occassion yes, a hand no.
What I noticed was Manning had more difficulty finding a receiver when we didn’t pressure him, kept players back in coverage, than we did rushing five to pressure him. He knew exactly what to do with the ball when we blitzed, we were forced to sit back and not rush and it was IMO personnell dictated or lack of personnell.
YOU ARE OUT of you kuku fufu mine craker laker Flaber baber FUNKI chunki brain. WE want to winn every year -- abayarde
Agree on most
Moats has rare ability to coordinate the movement of his feet and hands. He isn’t Merriman, but he could be effective at the right OLB position over time. Poor-man’s James Harrison is how I envision him.
It can’t be overlooked that Moats is one of the few Bills that can beat blockers on his own.
Starting the official Buffalo "Draft a Quarterback in the First Round in 2012" campaign.
yeah
Eli seems to be at his best when blitzed and it is picked up. a little time, and less people in coverage, make Eli a happy man.
Yes, I am a Giants fan. Now that we got that out of the way....
IMPEACH DOLAN!!!!
I will not - lose! -Jay Z-
Marines say Oorah; BBVer's say SUAMBP! say it with me - Suuaahmbp!!!!
I wonder if this plays into the same thing that makes him an inconsistent quarterback. He obviously has elite talent but is about as up and down as it gets. Perhaps he thinks too much when defenses drop back vs being more instinctual on blitzes. There’s no doubt that when he makes mistakes it gets into his head and causes him to make more mistakes, so this would all make sense to me.
Another Superb Analysis
Couldn’t agree more with all you say. Mark Gaughn of the Buffalo News recently wrote that the priorities next year should be TWO pass-rushing OLB’s and a CB. Hard to argue with that, except that the team may already have the CB on its roster in the form of Justin Rogers. They are very high on his athletic skills and instincts, but coming from a small school he apparently has a lot to learn on the technical side. I’m hoping that they give him some time at CB toward the end of this season so they can really see what they have in him.
On the fade route, your comments make me think of a drill that has now become a routine part of training camp in which the QB’s are asked to throw a fade pass into a garbage can located on the back corner of the endzone starting about ten yards out and then moving steadily back to increase the distance. The best Bills QB at the drill was Levi Brown, who actually put the ball in the can or hit the rim again and again. Thigpen came next, and then Brad Smith. Fitz was lucky if he got the ball within five yards of the can. Of all the passes in the QB’s arsenal, this seems to be the one that gives him the most trouble (which, I suspect, is why they installed this drill and had the QB’s spend 15 minutes doing it every practice).
That bucket drill is so telling
Great bring that up.
When I say corner, I’m really saying boundary corner. Maybe Rogers fits that bill. Florence is OK, and McGee is probably the best we have. I’ve been arguing all season that McKelvin is best in the slot where the plays are in front of him, and the last Giant drive pass defense is another brick in that argument for me.
I think Williams can be an effective boundary corner in the Jeff Burris mold. He’s also taller and rangy, and plays the ball well.
The guy I like coming out is Alabama’s De’Quan Menzie. Bigger, stronger, and good against the deep routes. If Buffalo commits a first round pick to a CB, they might get a shot at Kirkpatrick.
Starting the official Buffalo "Draft a Quarterback in the First Round in 2012" campaign.
My impression is that Justin Rogers is a boundary guy. The coaching staff seems to think he could be exceptional, but he does have a lot to learn given his college background. If he turns out to be as good as they think he could be, and if Williams continues to develop, there may be no need for using a high draft pick on a CB next year. I’m hoping that’s the case, because I would rather see us target OLB’s, a deep-threat WR, and possibly another 3-4 DE and a top-flight TE. But if they discover Rogers is not as good as they currently believe, then a CB will be essential.
I think that Rogers could be good, but Buffalo should stack up on boundary corners regardless
McKelvin, McGee and Williams can play in the slot as well. So having Florence, Rogers, and rookie X outside would give the team a lot of depth and flexibility.
And I’d keep six corners. With everyone going spread, they’ll be used.
Starting the official Buffalo "Draft a Quarterback in the First Round in 2012" campaign.
In this game at least, the compression of the offense was as much a product of the plays Fitz DIDN’T make as the plays we called. We had the Giants all set up to let Stevie beat them for a TD twice, precisely because they were playing up on the WR and we missed those deeper plays. To me it was less about the playcall or even the personnel at WR this week, but Fitz not making the throws he needs to make to keep the defense honest. We’ve seen it before. Against other teams he’s done it, but he had a few opportunities this week to take this game running away and the int’s on vertical plays ended it.
I have low expectations. But high hopes.
Hi DJ.....
Thanks for taking the time to write these posts, good job. Couldn’t watch the game, so I have a couple of questions…..
Most teams that play the Giants try to take the great Hakeem Nicks out of the game with heavy coverage, did we give d-flo much help with him?
And, against the Eagles, we came up with a clever blitz package for the first time this year, and it was highly successful, did we stay with the package or go back to our vanilla ways?
Thanks.
Go Bills!
PodunkO - The great post ender!
Buffalo went Florence on Nicks most of the game, in man or man-off coverage
Starting the official Buffalo "Draft a Quarterback in the First Round in 2012" campaign.
i think y'all put a lot of safety help over the top for Nicks
that’s why Manningham, and Ballard, were open at times.
And i don’t know about your blitz packages, but i wouldn’t say they were vanilla, they just never made it home. maybe a lil more stunts and stuff could’ve freed your guys better, but that never seemed to be the case.
Yes, I am a Giants fan. Now that we got that out of the way....
IMPEACH DOLAN!!!!
I will not - lose! -Jay Z-
Marines say Oorah; BBVer's say SUAMBP! say it with me - Suuaahmbp!!!!
The blitzes weren't vanilla
The players executing them were.
Starting the official Buffalo "Draft a Quarterback in the First Round in 2012" campaign.
The blitzes weren’t vanilla. The players executing them were.
That is sig-worthy.
.
When the job is finished no one remembers how long it took, just how well it was performed.
by Buffalo for Eternity on Oct 17, 2011 12:38 PM EDT up reply actions
On Spiller
I was really glad to see him making those catches. Just the fact that he was part of the action was a real good thing, prob the #1 positive from this game, IMO
by dgrid on Oct 17, 2011 11:53 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Yes!
We really, really need to get Spiller involved and eventually make us some big plays.
Go Spiller!
Go Bills!
PodunkO - The great post ender!
Totally agree. Just finished watching the game on Rewind and one of my takeaways was that Spiller did a good job providing a boost as a receiver running patterns. Would love to see him learn a good hitch and go.
Give a monkey a typewriter and infinite time, and he’ll eventually release Maybin. -- stetzwebs
No one circles the waiver wire like the Buffalo Bills!
by thefourwinds on Oct 17, 2011 11:34 PM EDT up reply actions
Don't worry about the draft just yet
I’m looking forward to the the 2nd half of the season to see if the rookies and 2nd years start to settle in and elevate their game. There might be a CB or pass rusher already on the team and he just hasn’t broken out yet.
by south123 on Oct 17, 2011 1:24 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
You mean BROKEN veteran
"Being a Bills Fan is a Tough Job for Tough People…" – Luther6
by Montel on Oct 17, 2011 3:02 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Progressions
The Giants radio announcers kept pointing out that Fitz didn’t seem to have a progression to go through after his primary receiver was covered. I couldn’t tell if this was because of the injuries, better coverage of the 2nd and 3rd receiver, or a lack of time due to a pass rush.
Did anyone else notice that? It suprised me when they said it.
Not true
The Giants’ announcers are used to watching Kevin Gilbride’s ridiculously complex offense that has players breaking differently.
Gailey’s offense isn’t as complex. Plus, to go through progressions, the QB normally resets his feet, especially is the read takes him backside. Fitzpatrick didn’t really have that type of time.
Starting the official Buffalo "Draft a Quarterback in the First Round in 2012" campaign.
Fitzy....
Has had several occasions against the eagles and bengals where he had time and just stood there, frozen.
When he is playing well, he moves in the pocket smartly, seeing and sensing the rush. He can play better than he has and he will after the bye.
PodunkO - The great post ender!
Maybe, but I don’t remember him standing there or being frozen. Maybe he was waiting for routes to uncover. The Spiller crossing route didn’t uncover until Spiller ran all the way across the field, for example. But I didn’t DVR either game, so I can’t go back and look.
Starting the official Buffalo "Draft a Quarterback in the First Round in 2012" campaign.
Get Rewind. At $29.99, it’s quite the deal.
Give a monkey a typewriter and infinite time, and he’ll eventually release Maybin. -- stetzwebs
No one circles the waiver wire like the Buffalo Bills!
by thefourwinds on Oct 17, 2011 11:35 PM EDT up reply actions
I thought....
He looks like he’s locking on a bit since cincy…… I think maybe, I really don’t know, it is a sign Of hist slumping a little bit. I know locking on is definitely a sign of slumping, I just don’t know if it is what Fitzy is doing.
Anyhow, he can correct it and will.
Go Bills!
PodunkO - The great post ender!
Disagree with the comment that we need to draft a CB early.
We just drafted Aaron Williams unfortunately he is injured but he will be good. Terrence McGee played well, but he is injury prone. Still Drayton is a good CB, he had one bad game. Although i agree we should draft a CB, maybe in the 4th-5th rd. not early. we already have McGee, Flo, Leodis, Williams. then we have corner and justin rogers. We dont need a CB, just have to develop the ones we have. Heres our top draft needs in my opinion:
1st: QB/OLB – I like Fitz, but he is NOT the guy in my opinion. He just isnt accurate enough. He will be good for another season or 2, but we need an accurate QB, with a stronger arm. And we clearly need a pass rush.
2nd: QB/OLB – same as above
3rd: WR – need a big fast reciever for a deep threat, idk if Donald Jones is that and i think Easely is done.
4th: OT – I think Pears and Bell are good, but soon Hairston will take one of their spots. And while they are playing well we need another tackle to develop into the future starter.
4th: OG – I think Urbik has played great, but not sold if he is consistent enough. I think Rinehart isnt that good and we could use depth in the interior and maybe develop into a starter.
5th: CB – maybe take a depth player here who could develop into a starter.
The rest of picks could be used for potential DL/LB depth
Fitzmagic
@tomcs re: 2012 Bills Draft Needs
Completely disagree with your QB assessment; I believe Fitz has proven he’s the right QB at this time for the Bills (I’d live with Thigpen as his backup through 2012, then take a QB to groom in the first round of 2013 draft).
I also disagree with the O-line projections. Given the way Bell, Pears, and Hairston have performed plus the fact they signed Sam Young off waivers to backup Pears, I’d still draft a RT backup prospect but late. I think getting a good RG prospect in is a much higher priority, though.
Other than those two issues I think you and I are thinking along similar lines for this next draft.
DJ, good writeup. Agree with a lot of your points.
Just finished watching the game on Rewind.
Bills definitely need a strong and speedy edge rusher in the next draft.
Loved Spiller – I think we need to see more of him as a receiver.
Loved TMac. He was amazing. I hope he can finally stay healthy.
Brad Smith could have been better.
Playcalling: the one opportunity I think Gailey missed was at the end of the first half, when it was 3rd and short. They bunched up the formation, ran it up the middle and couldn’t get the yard. Ended up settling for a FG. I wish in that bunched up formation, they would play action and hit the TE. In that setting, you could see a long gainer or maybe even a TD.
Give a monkey a typewriter and infinite time, and he’ll eventually release Maybin. -- stetzwebs
No one circles the waiver wire like the Buffalo Bills!
Almost forgot – David Nelson is still my favorite Bill. And congrats to Roosevelt. How about how he used the one Giants defender to shield the other defender chasing him and was then able to break away on his long TD.
Give a monkey a typewriter and infinite time, and he’ll eventually release Maybin. -- stetzwebs
No one circles the waiver wire like the Buffalo Bills!
by thefourwinds on Oct 17, 2011 11:39 PM EDT up reply actions
Bills 2012 Draft Needs - My Early Mock Draft Projections
I agree with the pass rusher comment but take slight issue with the CB call – I think they need a bigger CB to help deal with the bigger WRs but not as one of the top 2 priorities. I have them taking a taller CB in Round 4 (I give higher priority to also completing the upgrade of the defensive line with a more dynamic RDE and also boosting the WR corps before drafting yet another CB).
2012 Bills Draft Preview
1. JLB Vinny Curry
2. WR Mohamed Sanu
3. RDE Kendall Reyes
4. CB Trumaine Johnson
4. RG Amini Silatolu
5. NT Derek Wolfe
6. FB Joe Halahuni
7. RT Mitchell Schwartz
I would take Curry, who leads the nation in TFL with 17 and is 2nd in the nation with 9.5 sacks, to eventually replace Merriman at JLB but he would probably be a situational pass rusher who fills in at SLB on passing downs as a rookie.
Then I take advantage of the strong WR class by taking a stud outside receiver to replace Ruvell Martin in Round 2. Then I complete the defensive line upgrade by taking a much more disruptive RDE prospect in Round 3, and THEN I take that bigger CB in Round 4.
If Troup can somehow manage to remain available the rest of this season and do enough good to justify at least keeping him for 2012, I would change my Round 5 pick to taking a TE. But I believe he is a total bust and that Nix won’t hesitate to replace him if he feels the need in this next draft.
Draft?
Are you kidding me this season is at hand and we have a good team that just needs alittle tweeking, what would it hurt to bring in M.S.Walker, or someone else that can streatch the field and use our FB to carry the ball sometimes, also if we have to blitz let’s do it otherwise wasn’t there a LB from the Dolphins that retired early that can come in and help us with our pass rush? All these things can be done quickly without trades and maybe even on the cheap.
































