Charting The Buffalo Bills Offensive Passing Game
Six weeks of the NFL season is behind us and the Buffalo Bills are 4-2 heading into their bye week. They've won some games against some really good opponents and have been competitive in every single game they've played losing by a combined 6 points in their 2 losses - one of those losses was a field goal as time expired.
I thought it would be a good time to reflect on some aspects of the Bills offense and try to chart some tendencies of the Bills passing game. I wanted to look at how Fitzpatrick threw the ball short (Right, Left, Middle) and deep (Right, Left, Middle) so I used NFL.com's playbook and basically searched for key phrases in every game. It sounds tedious but it really only took me about 25 minutes to do so it wasn't that big of a deal.
A short pass is designated as a pass that travels 15 yards (at least that's from what I can tell, there is no legend) and a deep pass is one that is 16 yards or longer. I thought it would be better (and easier for me, honestly) to include passes where penalties were assessed on pass plays because we can still see how the Bills were going to attack the defense. So if you're counting the pass plays and see Fitzpatrick had more throws than what the stat sheet said that's why.
|
Philadelphia |
Cincinatti |
New England |
Oakland |
K.C. |
Totals |
||
|
Pass Short Middle |
12 |
6 |
7 |
5 |
7 |
2 |
39 |
|
Pass Short Right |
8 |
7 |
5 |
13 |
8 |
10 |
51 |
|
Pass Short Left |
3 |
9 |
8 |
8 |
14 |
3 |
45 |
|
Pass Deep Middle |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
1 |
0 |
3 |
|
Pass Deep Right |
0 |
0 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
2 |
5 |
|
Pass Deep Left |
0 |
2 |
0 |
3 |
0 |
0 |
5 |
|
Incomplete Pass Short Right |
1 |
4 |
4 |
3 |
4 |
2 |
18 |
|
Incomplete Pass Short Left |
1 |
2 |
0 |
3 |
2 |
3 |
11 |
|
Incomplete Pass Short Middle |
2 |
0 |
3 |
3 |
8 |
1 |
17 |
|
Incomplete Pass Deep Right |
0 |
1 |
4 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
11 |
|
Incomplete Pass Deep Left |
1 |
0 |
3 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
8 |
|
Incomplete Pass Deep Middle |
0 |
1 |
0 |
0 |
2 |
0 |
3 |
|
Total Passes |
216 |
|
|||||
|
Total SL |
56 |
|
|||||
|
Total SM |
56 |
||||||
|
Total SR |
69 |
||||||
|
Total DR |
16 |
Catch |
5 |
||||
|
Total DL |
13 |
Catch |
5 |
||||
|
Total DM |
20 |
Catch |
3 |
General Points
It doesn't take a Harvard Graduate (see what I did there? I know, pathetic) to know that the Bills and Fitzpatrick throw the ball short. What struck me is the balance in the short passing game. Gailey has said that he likes to stretch the field horizontally as well as vertically and these numbers bare out how the Bills are trying to attack a defense horizontally. Obviously with Fitzpatrick being a right handed QB it makes sense for him to be more comfortable and throw right so you see there is a 13 rep difference between short left/middle and short right passes but it was kind of interesting to me that after 6 games there is an equal number of passes short left and middle.
Another thing that stood out to me is that you can almost see how the Bills wanted to attack a defense. Other than Fitzpatricks more or less consistency throwing short right the Bills were attacking certain areas of a defense as evidence by say 12 short middle passes against Philadelphia's sub-par LB's.
The Deep Pass
The Deep Pass has been a point of contention among Bills fans for some time and these numbers really bring out how inefficient our offense is at the deep pass. I know that passes that travel further than 15 yards are more difficult to complete because your offensive line has to hold up and the receiver and QB have to be on the same page because it's easier for a DB to break on the ball but there is some serious work that needs to be done in this area.
The fact that the Bills have attempted 39 deep passes (16 yards or longer) and only completed 13 of them seems kind of pathetic. If I were a defensive coordinator i'd flood the short passing zones and make Fitzpatrick beat you deep. He hasn't shown that he can do that on a consistent basis and i'm certain that the Bills will see more man coverage deep because of Fitzpatrick's lack of success on the deep ball.
With Fitzpatrick and the Bills affinity for the short passing game you can also see how the Bills don't attack the entire field - which means that teams will hone in on what they are trying to do more easily in the passing game as the season wears on. Against the Eagles the Bills completed no passes longer than 15 yards. Against the Giants they didn't complete a deep pass right or middle. Against the Bengals they didn't complete a pass deep right or left and so on and so forth.
Conclusion
None of these numbers really surprised me when I was doing my research, but what is concerning to me is our inability to successfully attack all areas of the field; especially deep. If the Bills attack more deep areas a few times a game in order to keep defenses from focusing in on one aspect of our passing game then you could really see this offense be more explosive. I don't think this offense is overly predictable but it's predictable in the fact that you know some areas of the field aren't going to be targeted nearly as much so defenses are going to force Fitzpatrick to throw those deep routes more. At the same time that'll make our offensive line hold their blocks longer so you could see some really bad games if defenses play us like that, which I fully expect.
One good thing about this past game and the 2 interceptions that Fitz threw is that he recognizes that he has to work on those passes. You could see it in his post game press conference that he knew that was the reason they lost that game. I really think the Bills are going to make that a priority, along with pass rush, over the bye week. They need to open up this offense more often during a game while still being efficient in the short areas of the field. Fitz has the short passing game down about as good as one can get it, now he has to turn his attention to the deeper throws to keep the underneath plays open for business.
Just another great fan opinion shared on the pages of BuffaloRumblings.com.
16 comments
|
4 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
A deep pass is 15 yards in the air, not 20
I am almost certain that I have seen that, but I can’t cite a source. Good work on the chart.
I thought that too but look:
1-20-BUF 26 (4:07) R.Fitzpatrick pass short right to D.Nelson to BUF 41 for 15 yards (D.McCourty). Caught in flat
at BUF 41.
Ball on the 26 and caught at the 41 which is a 15 yard pass, so either its 16+ yards or 20+ yards. Typically those “deep pass” stats have a short, medium and deep category but the game books only do short and deep. so i assumed, maybe incorrectly, that deep was 20+
11 years of losing has taught me just a smidge of humility. - k8
I did the same thing and got some different numbers
I only looked for deep passes and didn’t break it down by the side of the field thrown to:
KC 2-5, 62 TD
Oak 0-4, INT, 2 PI 31
NE 5-9, 148, PI 31
Cin 1-8, 44
Phi 0-1
NYG 0-3, 2 INT, PI 26
Total 8-30, 254, TD, 3 INT, 4 PI 88
I added in Pass Interferences as a separate category and did not include them among the incomplete passes, since the play officially does not count. There was also one incompletion against Oakland where there was a roughing the passer penalty, so I didn’t count that one.
Sum result is that on 34 deep pass plays, the Bills have gained 342 yards, or over ten yards a play (357 on 35 if you include the roughing). There’s room for improvement, but I don’t think it’s been as dire as you might suggest.
i’m not suggesting it’s dire, i’m suggesting that it’s an issue that defensive coordinators will pay attention to and take that away so the Bills will have to get better at it.
and ya, the penalties kind of make for weird numbers because of roughing the passer etc… calls – but I included them regardless
11 years of losing has taught me just a smidge of humility. - k8
by J2 on Oct 18, 2011 1:47 PM EDT up reply actions
“If I were a defensive coordinator i’d flood the short passing zones and make Fitzpatrick beat you deep. He hasn’t shown that he can do that on a consistent basis and i’m certain that the Bills will see more man coverage deep because of Fitzpatrick’s lack of success on the deep ball.”
You just described what the Bengals, Eagles, and Giants did to the Bills in the 2nd of each game. How’d that work out for the Bills? But don’t worry, the Bills have a RB playing WR now.
Good points
I don’t like that we don’t have a consistent deep threat. On the other hand, this horizontal stretching is very west coast-like and can do some damage in the hands of the right QB, especially with WRs the size of Johnson and Nelson.
I also don’t think we should underestimate the presence of Fred Jackson. His abilities are keeping defenses honest and creating great one on one matchups. You have to keep an eye on Fred Jackson for the dump off pass otherwise you pay. So if you sacrifice a LB on FJ, then you have decent matchups that our WRs can legitimately win. i still wish Evans was here, that’s all water under the bridge.
Well done...rec'd
The fact that the Bills have attempted 39 deep passes (16 yards or longer) and only completed 13 of them seems kind of pathetic.
Got me to thinking….what would it look like if we compared Fitz to a QB who excels at throwing the deep ball…..how about Rodgers?
Don't fear the Reaper......fear The Beard
If you ask a question you don't want an answer to, expect an answer you don't want to hear.
Comparison to League Average is Better
Are you willing to give Fitz Rodgers’ offensive line and receiver corps to use in such a comparison?
A fairer comparison is to the league average.
true, but my idea wasn't as much to be fair as see what the opposite end of the spectrum was
Don't fear the Reaper......fear The Beard
If you ask a question you don't want an answer to, expect an answer you don't want to hear.
no you’re right – i really don’t feel like studying the Packers games for Rodgers but according to PFF 67% of all Brady’s passes last year were of the short variety. Difference being when Brady throws those longer passes hes tremendous at it and Fitz, clearly, doesn’t complete very many of those
by J2 on Oct 19, 2011 9:00 PM EDT up reply actions
Breakdown by receiver
Passes over 15 yards:
David Nelson
3-5, 71 yards, 2 PI 57 yards
Stevie Johnson
3-10, 114 yards, TD, 3 INT, 2 PI 31 yards
Donald Jones
2-10, 77 yards
Brad Smith
0-2
Fred Jackson
0-2
I guess we all agree that’s an area we ned to improve upon, which is way we should consider going out and getting a WR rather it’s Mike Sims Walker, or someone else to fill that role. Now is not the time to be stuborn which we appear to be doing. I know that coach has a commitment to get something out of C J Spiller, but let’s face it this is a high risk. Gailey knows his team better than others ( ME ) do but we’re not asking him to help out in the slot we need a deep threat who can not only run fast but go up and possibly battle in the air and come down with the ball, not to mention running routes, corner of the endzone catches, blocking down field, also what about the height reach advantage that most teams ours included like to have on the outside?
one question
If Trent Edwards was the “captain check down”, Fitz is what? Nothing against Fitz, i like the guy, but that’s numbers are fact, he can’t throw the deep ball. Not consistent enough. Wasn’t that the major problem on Edwards game? I think Fitz is better than Edwards, but is he better enough?
by Fernando brazil on Oct 18, 2011 8:42 PM EDT reply actions
There’s a big difference between checking down and throwing it short by design. Trent would read his first receiver, panic, and look for the check down. Fitz is far, far more decisive and is rarely checking down (hence the low number of sacks).
thanks
i’m just thinking, because i can’t see lot of Trent games.
by Fernando brazil on Oct 19, 2011 8:07 AM EDT up reply actions

by 




























