Bengals 23, Bills 20: Notes From The O-Line, Week 4
The Buffalo Bills squandered opportunities against the Cincinnati Bengals, and as a result squandered the opportunity to spend another week in sole possession of lead in the AFC East. What happened? Yes, the refs at times seemed to be a second unit that the Bills had to face on Sunday. Looking at it a bit more closely, a few other things became clear:
- The Bills ran 20 times and threw 37. That's a puzzling number given that the team had the lead for much of the game. It also made the team predictable, with the Bengals clearly expecting some runs just based on Chan Gailey's play-calling tendencies.
- The Bills ran fewer than 60 plays against the Bengals. While Buffalo had a normal number of possessions (11), the team failed to extend drives.
- Ryan Fitzpatrick had a miserable day against the blitz. This was an unwelcome change from the previous two games (13-of-17 for 141 yards and 11 first downs against Oakland, 5-of-6 for 115 yards with three first downs against New England), and contributed to those short drives. 4-of-9 for 64 yards and exactly one first down isn't going to cut it. Look for a disgruntled Philly defense to blitz early and often next week.
- The offensive line killed five plays, all of which were on first or second down. That left the offense in challenging down and distance situations, particularly when Fitzpatrick's struggles against the blitz were factored into the mix.
The first two drives were killed by defensive holding non-calls by the refs. The non-call on Stevie Johnson can almost be understood, but the linebacker grabbing Fred Jackson hand? Yeah, that one absolutely had to be called. Brad Smith killed the third drive by dropping a pass for first down yardage. Fitzpatrick killed the fourth drive by throwing to a well covered Smith on the right side of the line while Johnson was open for first down yardage on the left side of the field. Fitzpatrick's overthrow of Donald Jones doomed the fifth drive. David Nelson's penalty killed the sixth drive, and the seventh made it to the end zone.
After the half, the sack Demetrius Bell gave up killed the eighth drive. Jones failed to catch a low throw from Fitzpatrick on the ninth drive that would have led to a first down when added to the yardage on the subsequent two plays. The tenth drive was killed by a combination of Eric Wood's non-block on Domata Peko on a one-yard loss (would have been at least a two-yard gain if Wood made the block) and the refs deciding that Johnson's five-yard reception on third down was somehow not a catch - even though the ball never hit the ground. I'm chalking the last drive up to Gailey calling a play in which three of the five receivers ran patterns of less than three yards when five were needed.
| Individual Run Grades - Week 4 | |||||
| Player | Good | Decent | Bad | Killed | Grade |
| Bell, D. | 4 | 14 | 1 | 0 | 78.2% |
| Levitre, A. | 5 | 14 | 1 | 1 | 79.0% |
| Wood, E. | 3 | 13 | 4 | 2 | 74.0% |
| Rinehart, C. | 4 | 13 | 3 | 0 | 76.0% |
| Pears, E. | 2 | 17 | 1 | 0 | 76.0% |
| Hairston, C. | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 75.0% |
Bell, injured on the penultimate run-though (seemingly not seriously), had the best day of the offensive linemen on run plays. True, Andy Levitre had one more good run than Bell, but Bell's bad run play wasn't a killed play. Wood had a subpar game and killed two plays. He struggled through much of the game without getting any sort of movement on Cincy's defensive tackles. Chad Rinehart wasn't great, but he didn't do anything to make it likely that he'll be replaced when Kraig Urbik is healthy enough to play. Erik Pears had a fairly quiet day on run downs.
| Run Direction Success, Week 4 | |||
| Gap | Att | Yds | YPA |
| Left C | 2 | 4 | 2.0 |
| Left B | 2 | 3 | 1.5 |
| A | 8 | 23 | 2.9 |
| Right B | 4 | 29 | 7.3 |
| Right C | 4 | 19 | 4.8 |
The Bengals stacked the box on only three runs, each of which went for positive yardage. Three negative yardage plays went through the A gap, while each B gap saw a run play for zero yardage; three of those plays were killed by offensive line mistakes. The average for the B gap is skewed by the 21-yard run. The lack of negative plays to the Right C gap accounts for that decent average.
| Individual Pass Grades, Week 4 | |||||||
| Player | Good | Decent | Bad | Killed | Sack | Help | Grade |
| Bell, D. | 0 | 30 | 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 73.2% |
| Levitre, A. | 2 | 34 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 75.5% |
| Wood, E | 1 | 36 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 75.5% |
| Rinehart, C. | 0 | 37 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Pears, E. | 0 | 34 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 73.4% |
| Hairston, C. | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 75.0% |
The pass play stats are notable for the total number of bad plays (7) as well as the sack that Bell surrendered. The Bills totaled 14 bad run plays against Oakland and 11 against New England. The total number of bad run plays is moving in the right direction. Against, Cincy, however, the Bills allowed the Bengals to push the pocket. Given that the Bengals rushed only four linemen about 75 percent of the time, it was dispiriting to see the five offensive linemen lose ground to a smaller number of defensive linemen. Chris Hairston did get onto the field for a small number of snaps, but didn't stand out.
18 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Chris Hairston did get onto the field for a small number of snaps, but didn’t stand out.
Didn’t stand out in a positive or negative way, correct? He was in at LT for a critical series, one in which the Bengals front 7 could have really gone after Hairston. But from I watched, he at least looked competent, which I think bodes well for his future prospects.
by PineWoodsBillsFan on Oct 3, 2011 11:44 AM EDT reply actions
Just an observation but – Hairston looks huge.
"It’s like I’ve always said, don’t tell me about the labor pains, just show me the baby."
- Buddy Nix
"How can a guy with a name like Melo be such a pain in the ass?"
- George Lopez
by dnvrBillsfan on Oct 3, 2011 12:03 PM EDT up reply actions
in the uppr body
His legs are non proportional looking to me
The player I would like least at #9 would be my sister’s cat, Captain Creamsicle. She does have a great work ethic and agility, but I’m really concerned that at 9 lbs., she’s too small to play safety in the NFL. She also bites way too often on play action and is easily distracted by someone waving string in the crowd. Lastly, her wonderlic score was pretty awful, answering "meow meow meow" for most of the questions- Dr. Brackish Okun
by mob16151 on Oct 3, 2011 12:09 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
He's giant
That really stood out when I saw them here in Denver. Pears too…Buddy wanted to get bigger and he wasn’t kidding. These dudes are giant.
by buffaloparks on Oct 4, 2011 1:49 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Eh….he looked competant, but not good at this point. The potential is there. He doesn’t look like a train wreck, so I’ll take that as a plus. I wish they had another tackle option for the short-term though (besides their starting left guard).
Thank you thank you thank you thank you sireric for bringing the furious punching cat back into my life. - poz
by bluecollarbuffalo on Oct 3, 2011 12:10 PM EDT up reply actions
Who knows. Sample is ridiculously small and dominated by quick throws for “incompletions”. It ws a critical series where we failed (though not saying its on him).
I have low expectations. But high hopes.
by greysquirrel on Oct 3, 2011 12:22 PM EDT up reply actions
Just didn’t sftand out. You could say that’s great for a rookie lineman. You could say its not a promising sign. I’d just say that he didn’t stand out and await developments as he gets meaningful snaps.
I wasn't sure I was going to like the white helmets but seeing them in the practice footage, I've got to say that I love the look.
by Ron From NM on Oct 3, 2011 2:27 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
screens
One way to slow down the blitz is do use the screen pass. They did not attempt many during the game, which completely baffles me. They also did not get Nelson or Chandler involved nearly enough to spread the field out. Definitely not a time to panic, but needs some adjusting going into week 5 against the Eagles.
Last, Buffalo needs to find help for McKelvin. Anytime the ball is thrown his way I hold my breath. It’s like playing dodgeball against a guy with no arms. There is no hope for him, yet he continues to play.
I’m equally puzzled by the small number of screens and draws. That’s what you do against a team with a strong d-line like Cincy, yet we didn’t do it. I do think penalties, bad calls by the refs (as Ron points out), and bad luck on field position contributed to the offense’s problems in the first half.
cincy's d-line was quick to recognize and recover screens
or at least, that’s what it looked like to me. i remember at least 2 screen plays where freddy had a good number of blockers in front of him and it looked like he’d be able to break out for big yardage, but on both occasions (that i can remember, maybe there were more…) their d-line did a good job sniffing it out and make some athletic shoe string tackles from behind, stopping fred for little gain.
of course, if we had kept at it, i think it’s very likely he breaks out of the backfield cleanly and makes a good chunk of yardage. or, and i say this hesitantly, it’s possible if those screens go to spiller, his speed makes it impossible for their line to react. i doubt they could’ve made those lunging foot swipes in time to get to cj because of his explosiveness.
Screens don’t work well if the defense isn’t pressuring the QB. the Bengals got push without committing their LBs.
I wasn't sure I was going to like the white helmets but seeing them in the practice footage, I've got to say that I love the look.
by Ron From NM on Oct 3, 2011 2:29 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Is it just me, or does this seem like it would have been considered a decent to good outing from the OL during the 2010 season?
P.S. Thanks Ron, as usual.
"Slowly all the roles we act out become our identity. And in the end we are what we pretend to be." - Jerry Cantrell.
Chad Rinehart wasn’t great, but he didn’t do anything to make it likely that he’ll be replaced when Kraig Urbik is healthy enough to play.
This logic works both ways. It seems unlikely he’ll supplant Urbik for the very same reason.
The Bills ran 20 times and threw 37. That’s a puzzling number given that the team had the lead for much of the game. It also made the team predictable, with the Bengals clearly expecting some runs just based on Chan Gailey’s play-calling tendencies.
This seems to suggest we ran an uncharacteristically low amount but at the same that it was predictable. Wouldn’t running more be expected? Either way, we had three possessions in the second half before the game was tied with two of them being incredibly short (three and outs?). Not a lot of time to set any sort of run v pass trend. We reall didnt control the ball with the lead because we weren’t getting first downs and our defense wasnt getting stops. We needed more first downs.
I have low expectations. But high hopes.
Urbik wasn’t playing well. From what I’ve seen, Rinehart has played better, particularly in pass protection.
Go Buffalo Bills, Utah Jazz, and Arkansas Razorbacks
by Dyl on Oct 3, 2011 1:46 PM EDT up reply actions
INC on first down? Look for a run on second. The Bengals keyed on Buffalo’s tendencies and it worked well for them.
I wasn't sure I was going to like the white helmets but seeing them in the practice footage, I've got to say that I love the look.
by Ron From NM on Oct 3, 2011 2:30 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Philly blitzing
I don’t think we need to worry so much about Philly blitzing this week. This is not the Philly defense of old (e.g. Jim Johnson’s constant blitz attack). From what I have read, the Eagles have had numerous issues with their linebacking corps so far this year and they have attempted to generate pressure on opposing QBs using their front four. On top of that, Trent Cole is expected to miss the next 3 games (Philly’s top pass rusher). The Eagles D has been sub-par to say the least this year and hopefully the Bills can exploit the way that the Falcons, 49ers and Giants have in recent weeks.
The Cole injury is big. The bills didn’t do well facing a defense that could generate push with the front four. I really hope Buffalo goes heavy with the run….lean on the d-line and suspect LBs. Watch them double up on passes though. Oh, and the Eagles have some ball hawking DBs who wont drop multiple INT opportunities.
I wasn't sure I was going to like the white helmets but seeing them in the practice footage, I've got to say that I love the look.
by Ron From NM on Oct 3, 2011 2:32 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions































