Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Devils Beat Rangers, Head To Stanley Cup Finals

Ryan Fitzpatrick, Buffalo Bills' Passing Attack Has Been Solved

Photo

When the Buffalo Bills beat the New England Patriots in Week 3 to open the season with a 3-0 record, we noted that quarterback Ryan Fitzpatrick had just completed his sixteenth game as Buffalo's starting quarterback under Chan Gailey. In those 16 games, Fitzpatrick completed 327-of-552 passes for 3,841 yards with 32 touchdowns, 18 interceptions and a quarterback rating of 86.2. That's a solid season's worth of quarterbacking no matter what your name is.

However, in the six games since that date, Fitzpatrick has crashed back down to earth - along with the entirety of Buffalo's passing attack. In those six games, Fitzpatrick has completed 118-of-180 passes for 1,235 yards with seven touchdowns, nine interceptions and a quarterback rating of 77.4.

Teams have figured out how to generate pressure on Fitzpatrick, and he's become sloppy with the football as a result. Fitzpatrick's depleted receiving corps is limited in what it can accomplish in terms of the route tree, and they haven't been making plays for him. The play-calling has been suspect. But most importantly, Fitzpatrick isn't playing as well as he could be - and more importantly, he's not making the players around him better. There are plenty of reasons to be concerned about Buffalo's $59 million quarterback.

Comment 60 comments  |  2 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Way. Too. Predictable.

Fitz = M(C)²
"Lets Go Buff! a! lo!"
I got a TROPPer in the car, uhh!!

by bflo on Nov 14, 2011 1:08 PM EST reply actions  

It would help to have a credible deep threat like Lee Evans to stretch defenses. Doh!

by Rick A on Nov 14, 2011 1:15 PM EST reply actions  

ummm… the lee evans that’s on the bench in baltimore?

by billsmcgee on Nov 14, 2011 1:17 PM EST up reply actions  

hes been hurt

This even grates my passive cheese - LeClaire Bill

by poz on Nov 14, 2011 4:25 PM EST up reply actions  

Good lord, the Lee Evans would help folks can’t be the same as the Fitz cant throw it deep folks. Because if he can’t throw it deep, Lee Evans wouldn’t help. [Plus he should be effective in B-more and hasn’t been].

I have low expectations. But high hopes.

by greysquirrel on Nov 14, 2011 1:20 PM EST up reply actions  

Fitz threw a great deep ball to a wide open Spiller yesterday. Unfortunately, Spiller stumbled over the Braille yard markers trying to catch it.

by Rick A on Nov 14, 2011 1:24 PM EST up reply actions  

So Fitz CAN throw it deep….

I have low expectations. But high hopes.

by greysquirrel on Nov 14, 2011 1:25 PM EST up reply actions  

that was the best deep ball Fitz has thrown this season. he seems to continually underthrow/be too late with those passes…the receivers have gotten their openings but it’s so hard to catch an underthrown deep ball in this league

by Aden'sDaddy on Nov 14, 2011 1:43 PM EST up reply actions  

Evans has been out all year with a bum ankle (acquired after he was traded, not before).

by Rick A on Nov 14, 2011 1:28 PM EST up reply actions  

Therefore he would be a huge asset for this team.

I have low expectations. But high hopes.

by greysquirrel on Nov 14, 2011 1:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Evans should have stayed at the bus station...

Then he would not have had a bum ankle in preseason and would have caught that pass in Big D yesterday.
http://youtu.be/PTLiPbtnhvU

I had a drink the other day
Opinions were like kittens
I was giving them away
-Modest Mouse

by oompaloompa on Nov 14, 2011 2:25 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Ha Rec'd

Of course, in that reality, Easley wins the job and DOMINATES!!!!

I have low expectations. But high hopes.

by greysquirrel on Nov 14, 2011 9:21 PM EST up reply actions  

How does a hurt player stretch the defense?

"Slowly all the roles we act out become our identity. And in the end we are what we pretend to be." - Jerry Cantrell.

by stetzwebs on Nov 14, 2011 3:43 PM EST up reply actions  

? I don’t follow the question – obviously he wouldn’t have gotten hurt if he played in Buffalo – Bills players never get injured…

by JustAskTheAxis on Nov 14, 2011 3:56 PM EST up reply actions   2 recs

Teams have figured out how to generate pressure on Fitzpatrick

Have they figured it out, or are we playing our LG at LT? I like Levitre, but Fitz has looked pretty uncomfortable the last two weeks and its not helping overcome the rest of it.

I have low expectations. But high hopes.

by greysquirrel on Nov 14, 2011 1:21 PM EST reply actions  

Levitre looked outstanding pass protecting against Brian Orakpo. No, this is an opponents-have-figured-us-out thing.

Editor-in-Chief, BUFFALO RUMBLINGS®
@BrianGalliford

by Brian Galliford on Nov 14, 2011 1:22 PM EST up reply actions  

And he looked less than outstanding against Aaron Maybin and then again yesterday…. Blocking Orakpo one week doesnt make him a great LT and it doesn’t mean the runover at that position (and guard) isnt impacting our pass protection.

I have low expectations. But high hopes.

by greysquirrel on Nov 14, 2011 1:26 PM EST up reply actions  

When a team loads up one side and blitzes three or four against our two blockers then...

it isn’t a LG or LT thing… we need to beat the blitz right away with the hot reads or bring an extra RB/TE over to see where they are stacking up. Changing the cadence and count would help too. Dallas was just loading up and guessing on the snap 1/2 the time which we caught them offsides a lot and still couldn’t slow them down.

by dabillsr1 on Nov 14, 2011 1:30 PM EST up reply actions  

He looked less than outstanding trying to play a new position against two of the more exotic defenses in the NFL, you mean.

Editor-in-Chief, BUFFALO RUMBLINGS®
@BrianGalliford

by Brian Galliford on Nov 14, 2011 1:30 PM EST up reply actions  

Eesh, defensive?

I’m not out to get him cut. But he’s not our starting LT for a reason. And he’s not our second string LT for a reason and Rinehart isnt the starting LG for a reason. So that fact he is playing a new position and there is a lot of shuffling on the line has an impact — above and beyond simply what the other team is doing.

I have low expectations. But high hopes.

by greysquirrel on Nov 14, 2011 1:41 PM EST up reply actions   2 recs

No, not defensive.

Nor am I discounting your opinion. I’m just saying that the results of the last two weeks have been more about not being able to deal with the looks than Levitre’s play. By a wide margin.

Editor-in-Chief, BUFFALO RUMBLINGS®
@BrianGalliford

by Brian Galliford on Nov 14, 2011 2:23 PM EST up reply actions  

I definitely agree with your take on this. It was quite obvious on the first few drives where Ware was untouched at the line and was able to get to Fitz quite easily.

I’d feel much more comfortable with Levitre back at LG, though.

Circle the Wagons T-Shirts
Blue collar t-shirts, for blue collar fans.

by CircleTheWagonsTees on Nov 14, 2011 7:35 PM EST up reply actions  

I’m not disputing that other schemes matter, just that its tough to adjust to other schemes when the line is in flux. The combo has left Fitz looking much more hurried. He seemed to get hit many times in the last two games relative to the first 7.

I have low expectations. But high hopes.

by greysquirrel on Nov 14, 2011 2:09 PM EST up reply actions  

Levitre just doesn’t have the reps or experience at playing LT in the NFL…yet. Think about moving from an interior position to the outside, completely different. I’m pretty sure the Ryan brothers focused on Levitre.

Circle the Wagons T-Shirts
Blue collar t-shirts, for blue collar fans.

by CircleTheWagonsTees on Nov 14, 2011 7:36 PM EST up reply actions  

Screens

Levitre blocking upfield on the screens is what i feel is missing in the passing game. That is one of the major plays being sniffed out, and the shuffle on the oline has alot to do with it.

by NHBillzFan on Nov 14, 2011 8:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Receiving Corps

I think our receiving corps is pitiful. Steve Johnson is not a legit number 1 receiver; he should be a number 2 guy. David Nelson is a decent slot guy, but really none of the guys have the ability to gain separation against an above-average cornerback. They also don’t have anyone fast enough to really make the corners and safeties feel a need to protect against the deep ball. Donald Jones is our deep threat? Really?

by IthacaBillsFan on Nov 14, 2011 1:21 PM EST reply actions  

I agree that our receiving corps is awful, but I also think #13 is a legit #1 – he also can’t do everything by himself and needs some help from his QB and the WR’s around him… Definitely not a Steve Smith fan, but he didn’t go from being a #1 to a #2 and back to a #1 again because he didn’t have the skills – he needed someone to get him the ball consistently, and that’s not really happening right now for Stevie.

by JustAskTheAxis on Nov 14, 2011 2:55 PM EST up reply actions  

Also, his route-running has clearly suffered due to his injury, in my mind. I don’t think at his current status he’s a true #1, but a fully healthy Johnson is.

"Slowly all the roles we act out become our identity. And in the end we are what we pretend to be." - Jerry Cantrell.

by stetzwebs on Nov 14, 2011 3:45 PM EST up reply actions  

nice analogy with Steve Smith

This even grates my passive cheese - LeClaire Bill

by poz on Nov 14, 2011 4:27 PM EST up reply actions  

but I also think #13 is a legit #1

So in your opinion a legit #1 can go for almost a year without a 100 yard receiving game?

Girls use hair spray, Men don't.

DO YOURSELF A FAVOR AND GROW UP BY NOT USING HAIRSPRAY MALES!

Don't be a Paully!

by The Buffalo Kid on Nov 14, 2011 11:16 PM EST up reply actions  

yes, given the QB play he had, absolutely he can…

by JustAskTheAxis on Nov 15, 2011 7:14 AM EST up reply actions  

Jamming...

Jamming our receivers at the line of scrimage playing physical man-to-man is causing a lot of our passing woes. Casserly pointed it out on his post:

http://www.cbssports.com/nfl/story/16112140/week-10-thoughts-magic-is-over-for-bills

Also then you have Fitzy trying to jam it into receivers where they have not created any separation. Beating man to man coverage comes with quick hitting slants and drags across the middle. Also beating them over the top which Fitz has been trying to throw (i.e. the 4th down play in the first half), but we don’t have the Dez Bryants at WR to make plays over a CB. Fitz doesn’t throw a lot of back shoulder throws either because his accuracy isn’t that great.

Spiller is about our only speed and did beat his guy long… you just are asking a kid to do something that he hasn’t done probably his whole career and it isn’t always going to work.

by dabillsr1 on Nov 14, 2011 1:22 PM EST reply actions  

You have it exactly right and so does Casserly.

It is the weakness of the spread, holding receivers up at the line of scrimmage.

Not to mention you can’t run a decent play action pass out of the shotgun or pistol to slow down the pass rush, you allow the defense to not have to account for the run and just tee off out of an empty backfield putting unreal pressure on the line, which is just unforgivable in short yardage situations. I have hated the spread as a base offense. It works sometimes, but you need a power running gsme/play action off it offense too, to be able to compete with anyone.

Girls use hair spray, Men don't.

DO YOURSELF A FAVOR AND GROW UP BY NOT USING HAIRSPRAY MALES!

Don't be a Paully!

by The Buffalo Kid on Nov 14, 2011 11:21 PM EST up reply actions  

your earlier piece

awarding Jackson the game ball brings it home. In 9 games, there have been 5 offensive games balls. Jackson has 3. Fitz has not gotten one. Furthermore, I think Fitz’s ability has affected the play calling everyone is questioning. Gailey has done what he always has done, i.e. fit the game plan to the talent he has. The result is a rather vanilla, short pass, quick release game plan that, with spotty QB accuracy, no outside threat, and/or time to throw, is easy to figure out and defend. The Ryan brothers have drawn up the template that others will surely copy.

Took the crow out of the oven. Replacing it with the only bird this team reminds me of...a turkey!

by fansince60 on Nov 14, 2011 1:23 PM EST reply actions  

ooops, Fitz has gotten none

Took the crow out of the oven. Replacing it with the only bird this team reminds me of...a turkey!

by fansince60 on Nov 14, 2011 1:23 PM EST up reply actions  

How about some read/option pass with Smith at QB

I am one of the few people that actually like with Brad Smith comes in the game to take the snaps… I’d like to see more of it and more of him running the read option with Spiller/Jackson, etc. I am just waiting for a few plays where he fakes the run and pulls up and tossing a few too. That will soften up the defense a bit and keep them on their toes… Why do we continue to do the same things when teams know what we are doing week after week.

by dabillsr1 on Nov 14, 2011 1:25 PM EST reply actions  

Fitz relies a lot on pre-snap reads

When the defense disguises coverages and blitzes, he gets in trouble – i.e., the Calvin Pace int last week, and the unblocked blitzers getting home against the Cowboys.

We’re also getting stuffed in our short game. The quick screen to Fred yesterday is a great example – 5 Cowboys read the play and were there immediately. We sent Chandler in motion across the formation to come block, but the Cowboys diagnosed the screen and buried it. They obviously were not worried about us sneaking anything over their heads.

I guess I may be in a minority who thinks we need to use Fred more as a decoy in the passing game. Get him more touches in the run game, but let him draw attention outside in the pass game and go elsewhere. Boy, how nice would Roscoe Parrish be right about now?

by WV2Buffalo on Nov 14, 2011 1:40 PM EST reply actions  

and more importantly, he’s not making the players around him better

This is a two way street, the players around him have had there share of drops and mistakes. If Spiller makes that catch and if Jones doesn’t cause that interception, Fitz has at least respectable numbers. The Spiller drop was brutal, Fitz made a nice throw and took a shot to get that off, that play has to be made.

This game felt a lot different to me than the Jets game on the offensive side. I thought we were capable of moving the ball and the game plan was ok (although I do agree Spiller and Jackson need more touches), the biggest problem was the execution all around. The team has relied on sound fundamentals and one of the biggest differences has been the turnovers. If Fred and Fitz combine for a fumble and 2-3 interceptions a game then team has no chance.

by TJJ on Nov 14, 2011 2:09 PM EST reply actions  

Spiller

I need to look at a replay of the deep ball to Spiller again, but I thought it was overthrown and Spiller stumbled at the end because his center of gravity was too far forward as he reached for the ball.

I had a drink the other day
Opinions were like kittens
I was giving them away
-Modest Mouse

by oompaloompa on Nov 14, 2011 2:39 PM EST up reply actions  

I seem to remember Spiller stumbling prior and the ball still hit him in the hands, he has to make that catch in my opinion. My point wasn’t to take away from that fact that Fitz needs to be better, there was a play where he completely missed on a deep ball to Jones who was wide open. I just felt like the plays were there on the offensive side in this game, they just didn’t execute.

by TJJ on Nov 14, 2011 2:49 PM EST up reply actions  

not sure if he stumbled because the ball was overthrown a little or if he started stumbling first, but either way, where it hit him on the hands would make it an incredibly difficult catch, especially given his body position at the time…

by JustAskTheAxis on Nov 14, 2011 2:58 PM EST up reply actions  

Fitz isn’t nearly as good a QB as it appeared he was over the first few games and he isn’t nearly as bad as he’s been over the last few – this isn’t news. What’s ridiculous to me is why everyone jumped on the Fitzpatrick as savior bandwagon so early in the season.

Guys like Fitz don’t make these major leaps after 6 or 7 years in the league from undrafted guy competing for a roster spot and getting beat out by Trent Edwards in training camp to Pro Bowler who is going to take this team to the next level. Fitz’s mechanical deficiencies are well documented on this site, so I’ll refrain from outlining them again – My point is this though:

Ryan Fitzpatrick, as fun as his beard or nickname or story or Harvard education or whatever ridiculous thing that distracts fans from his actual play on the field may be, is a mediocre QB at best and this team will go nowhere with him at the helm. He is still our best option at the position at this time, but the Bills will be relegated to the sidelines for many Januarys to come unless they put an elite talent at that position.

Fitzpatrick isn’t the answer – he wasn’t the answer last year, he wasn’t the answer when we were 3-0, and he isn’t the answer now. I know we have issues at a number of other positions as well, but this cannot be overlooked any longer.

by JustAskTheAxis on Nov 14, 2011 3:30 PM EST reply actions   2 recs

I agree people swing too wildly but this seems like too much

this team will go nowhere with him at the helm

Teams with decent QBs can go places. IF you mean they won’t win the superbowl okay, probably not. But they can certainly make the playoffs with a guy like Fitz. Plenty of teams have gone further with less. This insistence he is not the answer seems a little like some people’s insistence he is a savior (which I have not seen much of, its a strawman argument). Its all just extremes. What are answers? Is this some euphemism for top 5 QB? Whats the question?

I have low expectations. But high hopes.

by greysquirrel on Nov 14, 2011 4:14 PM EST reply actions  

Teams with decent QBs can go places

It takes a special defense to overcome the QB deficiencies (Jets, Baltimore, even 49ers this year) and given the direction offense is headed in the NFL, it’s more critical to have a QB who can consistently put you in a position to win – we don’t have that.

This insistence he is not the answer seems a little like some people’s insistence he is a savior… Its all just extremes

The evidence that he is not the answer, IMO, far outweighs the evidence that he is.

by JustAskTheAxis on Nov 14, 2011 4:36 PM EST up reply actions  

I’m still waiting for the question. Its like Jeopardy with this answer business.

I have low expectations. But high hopes.

by greysquirrel on Nov 14, 2011 5:13 PM EST up reply actions  

This is a team being smashed by injury...

Particularly the receivers and O’line. That has to have a significant impact on a teams ability to play consistent football.

You can’t mess around with you left tackle, right guard and slot receiver and deep threat receiver (I think that is what donald jones is) and not see an impact.

Steve Johnson has been playing with a groin injury. A significant injury for a receiver.

A QB will only be as good as his surrounding cast. Fitz’s team mates are banged up or coming back from injury. When he had a full deck he was awesome.

Let’s take a breath and see how this thing pans out.

THE +++++BUFFALO CRUSHERS ++++++. WHAGON BLASTERS ++++ ARE THE REAL DEAL WE ARE THE YING AND THE YANG . SO GET READY CAUSE NO ONE I MEAN NO ONE IS STOPIN THE WHAGON BLASTER BUYAAAAAAA - Abayarde

by muzza34 on Nov 14, 2011 4:23 PM EST reply actions  

Smashed By Injury

And that happens to every/our team every year. If only no starter got hurt we’d be awesome. We lack a QB and quality starters/depth at quite a few positions of need. This hasn’t changed since before draft. Remember were re building again:)

by buffalobacker on Nov 14, 2011 5:48 PM EST reply actions  

lacking a qb....

no. why are we saying this. He did not have that bad of a game. The defense could not make one stop and donald jones cant catch. If we had better receivers i might agree. But being down 21 so early causes you to pass all the time. If the defense can make a stop and we are down 14-0 we can go using a balanced attack, running and passing. When fred only gets 10 touches we are not going to win. No matter what fitz does.

Fitzmagic

by tomcs on Nov 14, 2011 6:01 PM EST up reply actions  

Because

Consensus is you need a franchise QB above all to win in todays NFL, It’s that simple. Fitz isn’t winning any games on his own, he’s not elite yet we draft D/L at 3rd overall last yr. Give me a break. Think Colts winning “suck for Luck” sweepstakes. Bill’s out matched FO wise, that simple. Ralph’s not in touch with todays NFL. Let it go Ralph!

by buffalobacker on Nov 15, 2011 1:49 AM EST up reply actions  

I Have faith in Fitz

we know what he lacks, we know what he brings to the table. we finally have a qb that can win in a 2 minute drill, and dont say he cannot as he did it when the team was healthy. We also know he is raw, it is his first time starting a full season, so basically he is in his sophmore year. He did have a chance in the 2 minute during the Giant game and blew it,so we know he needs help. The great thing is, we know he is our starting qb and will be for the next few years, so we can use those draft picks to get him talent on the wr core (easly and parrish are still on the team however), better TE’s and maybe some CB’s too. Point is, we wont have that QB talk for the next few years when April rolls around and this team can build around him. I mean, last April who thought we would even be having this discussion? Werent people laughing at the though of the playoffs, now we are worried we wont make it, and upset we lost the division lead? If that isnt progress i dont know what is. Go Fitz, Go Bills, Sign Freddie and Stevie to long term deals, get better Eric Wood and D. Bell. 2014 Superbowl vs. Detroit here we come!

by NHBillzFan on Nov 14, 2011 9:21 PM EST reply actions  

it is his first time starting a full season

He’s got 45 starts under his belt – I wouldn’t exactly call that raw.

by JustAskTheAxis on Nov 15, 2011 8:47 AM EST up reply actions  

I disagree!,

While I agree that it was way too early to hand out that type of money to what in my opinion is still an unproven QB, with a lot to prove still. Fitz is smart and definitely a leader, but doesn’t have the arm strength. But in his defense, the Bills have not provided him with the personnel needed to enhance his game. No deep threat at Wide Receiver to stretch the field and too many injuries with free agent castoffs in Donald Jones and Marcus Easley – Naaman Roosevelt, give me a break! Draft a few quality wide receivers that can get open and a tight end that can get open, might be able to see Fitz numbers go up. The only option for Fitz is Fred Jackson and Fred Jackson. It’s time to get rid of Roscoe Parrish as well. Bills need to draft or look at this position in free agency next year. He has no supporting cast!

by BuffaloWhiner on Nov 14, 2011 10:52 PM EST reply actions  

don’t mean to kick fitz when he’s down. i’ve given the man credit when he’s played well and been critical when he’s played poorly. but all along i have stated i’m unhappy about his contract extension not so much because of the amount of money he is getting. rather because i still don’t believe he is talented enough to take us to championship-contender level. for that we need an elite qb. and i just don’t believe fitzy is or ever will be that.

"They’re a very special group of men. Cherish them, you will not see their like again."

by chaucer on Nov 15, 2011 2:29 AM EST reply actions   1 recs

Fitzz does a lot of good things, but I still wish we had drafted a QB!

"Being a Bills Fan is a Tough Job for Tough People…" – Luther6

by Montel on Nov 15, 2011 12:39 PM EST via mobile reply actions  

DEFENSE, DEFENSE, DEFENSE

AND THE OFFENSE WILL BE FINE……

too much pressure to score too many points.

try functioning well when you have someone insisting
you have to do more than you (or almost anyone else)
is capable of…….

our D has been BRUTAL………

makes Offense 1 Dimensional…….

watch all the other team play and their QBs are
not expected to score 28-35 points (or more)
in order to win……..

EG Alex Smith, Andy Dalton, normally Sanchez…

even Brady cannot score 35 pts per game…….

Edwards will NOT BE AROUND NEXT YR
if this horror show on D continues……

I feel for Fitz and the O…….

just horrific set of circumstances in Dallas…..

and most every other game this season……

by simonpure on Nov 15, 2011 4:02 PM EST reply actions  

EXACTLY

i dont get why NO ONE can understand this…

Fitzmagic

by tomcs on Nov 15, 2011 5:01 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

SB Nation's home for all things Buffalo Bills.
Community Guidelines :: Essential BR

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Bills_small
An Exploration of Ryan Fitzpatrick's TDs and INTs
Small
Beyond the Perfect Offseason: Where Do We Go From Here?
Dsc00843_small
NFL Divisional Record And Playoff Berth Correlation, 2002-2011

Recent FanPosts

Small
Who Will be the Number 2?
Spikes_small
Remaining Free Agents
04_buffalo_bills_football_coloring_at_coloring-pages-book-for-kids-boys_small
Mock 2012 Season
Small
The Return of the Running Back(s): Revisiting the Road to the Super Bowl
Small
Difference Between A "Franchise" QB and an "Elite" One
303857_872291743296_10504698_40499694_6362492_n_small
Be A Little Nicer Please, Bills Fans  :)
Cyclops1-12nd7cv_small
Current QB Wins
Small
The Count-Down to the Right Numbers
Bruuuuce_small
Ranking All 32 NFL Starting QB's : Who is ELITE?
Snapshot_20120113_small
Next Stop: 3rd Generation of Winners

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Screen_shot_2012-03-07_at_6 Brian Galliford

100_2488_small MattRichWarren

Authors

Range_march_2011_small Ron From NM

Slide1_small Der Jaeger

Moderators

Sucks_small Kurupt

Mrsinister03_small sireric

Cordy_small poz