Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

Brad Smith Stepping Into Bills' No. 2 WR Role

Stevie Johnson has been entrenched as a starting wide receiver for the Buffalo Bills all year. Starting in the summer, the player running alongside him in the starting lineup has been, in no particular order: Lee Evans (traded to Baltimore before the pre-season), Donald Jones (on Injured Reserve) and various other injury fill-ins.

With the Bills so depleted at receiver - we mention the Evans trade and Jones being on IR, where he's joined by Roscoe Parrish and Marcus Easley - the team debuted a new No. 2 receiver in Sunday's 28-24 loss to the New York Jets. That player was No. 3 quarterback Brad Smith.

Smith was signed to a four-year, $15 million contract after this summer's lockout to run the Wildcat and bring value to the team's 46th active roster spot. He's spent the year playing receiver, running the Wildcat, and returning and covering kicks. Until Sunday's four-catch, 77-yard performance - in which he hauled in passes of 17, 16, 36 and 8 yards - he had been relatively quiet. Now, he's entrenched as a focal point in Buffalo's offense.

Star-divide

"He did an excellent job," said head coach Chan Gailey of Smith's Week 12 effort on Monday. "I'm glad you brought that up, because I wanted to talk about that. He did a good job. He made some plays, he was a factor in the game, and he's a big target out there. I'm anxious to see how he can continue to improve."

When asked if Smith had done enough to stick in the lineup as a receiver, Gailey responded as follows: "Yes. No question."

Throughout this season, David Nelson has been Ryan Fitzpatrick's go-to No. 2 target behind Johnson at receiver. Johnson leads the team with 54 receptions and 622 yards, but Nelson is right behind him with 45 receptions and 480 yards. Both players have caught five touchdown passes. Nelson, however, has found his niche as a slot receiver in Gailey's offense - and though his production has stayed relatively consistent regardless of where he's lined up, it could not be clearer that Gailey prefers the matchup problems Nelson presents when he's lined up inside.

That makes Smith a key figure as the Bills finish out the remaining five games on their schedule this season. Buffalo's offense was effective moving the ball for the first time in weeks on Sunday because of the threat that Smith provided on the edge; the team really hadn't had much of that since Week 3, when Jones caught five passes for 101 yards against New England.

Offensively, Smith has spent most of his time playing receiver this season - which isn't surprising, given that the Bills spread the field with multiple wideouts so frequently. The Bills, however, may be tinkering with their receiver depth chart this off-season, now that they've got another full year of experience with their young players out of the way. Smith remains arguably the biggest unknown of this receiver group - and if he can close the year strong and continue to open up the field for Johnson and Nelson to make plays, his role could expand beyond Wildcat quarterback and sub-package receiver heading into the 2012 season.

Comment 21 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

This role seems nothing but perfect for him. I wonder why it’s taken so long to figure this out?

"Go check on the ribs!"

by TheAfghanTwilight on Nov 29, 2011 11:47 AM EST reply actions   1 recs

To be fair, Smith hasn’t actually showed that much as a receiver prior to last game. He hasn’t been terrible, but certainly has been inconsistent.

Official ledge-talker-offer of the Buffalo Bills.
Citi Field loves the mets so much it smothers them. -the caveman

by WhyBillsWhy on Nov 29, 2011 3:17 PM EST up reply actions  

I think what has been inconsistant are the opportunities he's had at the position...

Up until the recent injuries he’s had very few opportunities. He’d get sprinkled in here and there and from what i’ve seen even during the small amount of times earlier in the season he’s been on the field at the wr position fitz got him the ball so to me that tells me he’s at least gotten open w/ those few opportunities.

I guess what i’m saying isn’t that he’s going to be consistant, but that he hasn’t been given enough opportunities to know either way at this point.

by Shovel51 on Nov 29, 2011 6:47 PM EST up reply actions  

Nice Article

I am quite interested in how Smith plays at WR moving forward. He looked more comfortable this week than in prior games. I am wondering if his knowing he was starting and lots of balls would come his way helped him focus.

His height and athleticism allowed him to have opportunities to catch three balls that no other Bills receiver would have touched: an incompletion he should have caught early; the TD he caught; and the throw he missed on the left side of the end zone in the final drive.

He is tall and has some very long arms. He also appears to have “smooth” athleticism and strength. With more work on his route running and hands it is conceivable that Smith becomes a productive starting receiver for the Bills.

by WhatGoesAround on Nov 29, 2011 11:47 AM EST via mobile reply actions  

What about Smith getting injured?

As soon as teams realize they can take shots at a QB playing WR, I’d expect to see teams lining up to get hits on him. Especially with the way the Bills offense seems to burn through WRs, how smart is it to risk the 3rd string QB this way?

Secondly, does this mean that Smith can be listed as a WR next year so that we can get a real 3rd string QB in the lineup? I really don’t like the idea of having to rely on Thigpen if Fitz gets hurt even for a game.

by J_Mac on Nov 29, 2011 11:49 AM EST reply actions  

Why would u want the team to carry 3 legit QBs?

Fitz doesnt have a big injury History, Not saying i have loved what i have seen from thigpen but at most I would want to see a developmental prospect on the practice squad next year not 3 true QBs on the roster.

by SPCtacular1 on Nov 29, 2011 11:54 AM EST up reply actions  

Secondly, does this mean that Smith can be listed as a WR next year so that we can get a real 3rd string QB in the lineup?

Two questions. No. 1: how often is a third-string QB “in the lineup”? No. 2: If we list Smith as a WR to get a third-string QB, why would the third-string QB suddenly leapfrog Thigpen on the depth chart (and still be decidedly out of the lineup)?

Editor-in-Chief, BUFFALO RUMBLINGS®
@BrianGalliford

by Brian Galliford on Nov 29, 2011 12:00 PM EST up reply actions  

STOP

With the common sense

by fanick82 on Nov 29, 2011 12:52 PM EST up reply actions  

4 teams (Raiders, Cardinals, Texans and Eagles) have had to play 3rd string QBs this year. Either their backup got hurt or was so bad that they got pulled. From what I’ve seen of Thigpen, the second possibility could definitely happen.

by J_Mac on Nov 29, 2011 1:19 PM EST up reply actions  

Texans had Owen Daniels this past sunday on the depth chart as their 3rd QB

Most teams just run with 2 on gamedays and play a more important position now in the 46th spot.

Goose22- "I have a quick first step, I’m so good just go an ask my rep
I look like Tarzan but play like Jane" Aaron May(have)bin

by WABillsfan on Nov 29, 2011 9:28 PM EST up reply actions  

Secondly, does this mean that Smith can be listed as a WR next year so that we can get a real 3rd string QB in the lineup? I really don’t like the idea of having to rely on Thigpen if Fitz gets hurt even for a game.

Sounds like your issue is with Thigpen being #2….oh nevermind….

I agree with what Brian posted above…..

by PineWoodsBillsFan on Nov 29, 2011 12:01 PM EST reply actions  

Donald Jones opinion

Brian,

In your opinion, why are the Bills so high on Donald Jones? Besides one good game against the Patriots, IMO Jones has not looked good this season. I’ve seen countless drops from Jones, but yet he was still in the starting lineup. I think Jones would make a good 5th WR & special teams player (he had a great pass break-up against the pats (I believe) which would have been an INT). But with Brad Smith looking as well as he did on Sunday, why was Jones given the nod over Smith?

by steve b. on Nov 29, 2011 12:49 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

The pass break-up of Jones’ that you’re referring to came in the Oakland game, right before David Nelson’s game-winning touchdown grab.

Jones was given the nod over Nelson because the team likes Nelson better in the slot. Jones was given the nod over Smith because the team already had specific plans for Smith as a return man and as the Wildcat quarterback. I suppose you can ask why he was chosen as the No. 2 over Roscoe Parrish (slot guy) or Marcus Easley (illness, inexperience), but those are pretty easily answered, too.

Once they traded Evans, it was pretty clear that Jones was the best – if not only – option to start. The team has talked him up, but I’m not sure they won’t look for an upgrade this off-season. In fact, I’d guess that they will try to upgrade.

Editor-in-Chief, BUFFALO RUMBLINGS®
@BrianGalliford

by Brian Galliford on Nov 29, 2011 1:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Thanks Brian! IMO, I though Kamar Aiken looked good in preseason and should have been given a shot once we saw Jones struggle to catch passes on a consistent basis this season.

In your opinion, is Marcus Easley’s career as a Bill over with? I haven’t heard any word on him since he was put on IR, but I would have to think that his heart ailment will seriously impact his NFL career.

by steve b. on Nov 29, 2011 1:30 PM EST up reply actions  

I think Easley is done as a football player

I liked Aiken as well and think he is the 4th WR now

"The Buffalo Bills have just exploded all over the Cincinnati Bangles"
-Steve Tasker-

by billsoferie on Nov 29, 2011 2:13 PM EST up reply actions  

probably is 4th, when Roosevelt is out.
Did he play any snaps at all last sun?

by dgrid on Nov 29, 2011 6:57 PM EST up reply actions  

so far ,hard see much difference between B Smith and D Jones as receivers imo, neither fill the void left by Parrish an Easley. Really hope to see Kamar Aiken getting some reps.

by billfan on Nov 29, 2011 1:30 PM EST reply actions  

Theres definitely a difference...

Whether there is a consistent, noticeable impact is another story. However, his size and length alone should make one believe that he’d be a better target for Fitz at the very least. Not to mention he seems far more comfortable on the edge than he is in the slot, over the middle. Might just be me though.

by aRC on Nov 29, 2011 3:32 PM EST up reply actions  

Seems Smith is more of a natural athlete as well. I bet if the team commits to playing him at WR, and if Smith commits to improving his patterns, he could certainly be at least as good as Parrish ever was, if not better.

Give a monkey a typewriter and infinite time, and he’ll eventually release Maybin. -- stetzwebs
No one circles the waiver wire like the Buffalo Bills!

by thefourwinds on Nov 29, 2011 3:50 PM EST up reply actions  

smith fits nix and gailey's general preference

for tall targets, all else being equal….

he just needs more reps, will be fine….

certainly does not lack for speed…….

by simonpure on Nov 29, 2011 3:18 PM EST reply actions  

I like the idea of BSmith being on the field all the time. Just adds more options to the offense.

Never confuse movement with action.
~Ernest Hemingway

by NolaBillsFan on Nov 29, 2011 10:34 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

SB Nation's home for all things Buffalo Bills.
Community Guidelines :: Essential BR

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Bills_small
An Exploration of Ryan Fitzpatrick's TDs and INTs
Small
Beyond the Perfect Offseason: Where Do We Go From Here?
Dsc00843_small
NFL Divisional Record And Playoff Berth Correlation, 2002-2011

Recent FanPosts

Small
Who Will be the Number 2?
Spikes_small
Remaining Free Agents
04_buffalo_bills_football_coloring_at_coloring-pages-book-for-kids-boys_small
Mock 2012 Season
Small
The Return of the Running Back(s): Revisiting the Road to the Super Bowl
Small
Difference Between A "Franchise" QB and an "Elite" One
303857_872291743296_10504698_40499694_6362492_n_small
Be A Little Nicer Please, Bills Fans  :)
Cyclops1-12nd7cv_small
Current QB Wins
Small
The Count-Down to the Right Numbers
Bruuuuce_small
Ranking All 32 NFL Starting QB's : Who is ELITE?
Snapshot_20120113_small
Next Stop: 3rd Generation of Winners

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Screen_shot_2012-03-07_at_6 Brian Galliford

100_2488_small MattRichWarren

Authors

Range_march_2011_small Ron From NM

Slide1_small Der Jaeger

Moderators

Sucks_small Kurupt

Mrsinister03_small sireric

Cordy_small poz