The type of receiver we need
There were 2 articles in today's Web Rumblings that were really fascinating to me. This post is not about pay Stevie the money. I am already assuming Stevie will be back and all this talk is much ado about nothing.
I want to talk about our Z type receiver. The first article is Z's remain dormant in Bill's offense.
http://www.buffalonews.com/sports/bills-nfl/article689841.ece
This article shows how Bills' yards/catch at this position is the lowest in the league at 9.7 yds/catch.
As a lot of you might know there are 3 types of receivers - X, Y and Z.
Wikipedia does a decent job of explaining what those are:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wide_receiver
Guys at link below also do a really good job of explaining it:
http://www.footballsfuture.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=324366
The article explains that we are set at our X and Y positions. The X receiver is the guy who faces press coverage. He is good at it either because of his size like calvin johnson or due to his hand-use and skills like reggie wayne. Stevie is the Reggie Wayne type. X receiver is usually the go to guy.
The Y receiver is the slot receiver. I think between David Nelson and Parrish if he returns, we have that covered.
The Z receiver is where we have the problem. The Z receiver lines up off the LOC to avoid jamming. This guy is usually the deep threat in the team and lines up on the strong side. Our group of donald jones, brad smith and cj spiller is not working at this position. They are the worst in the league. Some of the best Z receivers this year in the league are Jordy Nelson, Desean Jackson, Julio Jones, etc...
The other article related to this is Fitz missing the deep ball by espn
http://espn.go.com/blog/afceast/post/_/id/36214/ryan-fitzpatrick-missing-the-deep-ball
This shows how Fitz is connecting on only 27% of the deep passes. The article goes on to say we need a deep threat next year either through the draft or FA.
But which kind? That's the question.
You might point out that we already had Lee Evans and we traded him away. But if you read these links here, it explains well that the Z receiver needs to be a really good run blocker as well. Teams usually like to run on the tight end side. Since the Z receiver lines up on the tight end side, he needs to be good at run support. As we know, Lee was not good in run support and lacked the desire to improve on that. Plus the fact that he is injured most of this season makes the trade good.
If you put the two articles together, here is the result. Fitz will never be a Drew Brees or Michael Vick in deep ball accuracy and arm strength. So speedsters like Desean Jackson, or Lee Evans are not what this team needs. Even if these receivers outrun the corner backs, it's worse than a coin toss if Fitz will find them. He will most likely overthrow wildly or underthrow and get intercepted. Plus these guys are small in size and will not be of help in run support.
Who we need for our deepthreat is a tall and big receiver. A guy who wont outrun a CB but will be very physical to contest and win the ball. This guy also because of his size will be a good run blocker. Deep-threat doesnt only mean speed.
You might point out that we already have David Nelson who is 6'5. But if you see our roster, none of the guys are physical. David Nelson is tall but lanky. He is not going to come out a winner every time he contests. He is better suited in the slot because of his skills. Donald Jones is neither tall or big at 6'0 and 209 lbs. CJ Spiller is the exact opposite of what we need. Brad Smith can be the guy at 6'2, 215 lb but he hasnt shown anything yet. Hagan and Aiken are also of the same build but even they need to show something. Marcus Easley is 6'2 221lbs and runs a 4.38s 40. He really could be that guy but with his uncertain future, I dont think we should depend on him. When asked if he will be in next year's plan, Gailey said, " It's upto him.". That's a weird answer.
But there are plenty of options in the draft in all the rounds. We dont need a Michael Floyd in the first round to make this happen although that would be good. (Did you guys see that contested TD he scored yesterday in the bowl game?). I say we target one in the 4th round.
Jeff Fuller at 6'3 220 lbs and Marvin McNutt at 6'2 215 lbs are 2 guys I would target in the 4th round.
But speedsters like Jarius Wright and Joe Adams are exactly the guys who we dont want.
Who do you guys think we should get?
Just another great fan opinion shared on the pages of BuffaloRumblings.com.
64 comments
|
5 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I too think this type of target is worth pursuing in FA or draft. Maybe the thought is that Easley can fill that role, although he’s not that tall either. Donald Jones is not the guy, he’s just A guy. Wasn’t this why we drafted Hardy a few years ago, and then TO filled the role?
Also, I believe Malcolm Floyd is a Charger, not a Fighting Irishman. I knew you meant Michael though :)
by BuffaloRepresent on Dec 30, 2011 11:20 AM EST reply actions
Also
added Marcus Easley here. He is 6’2. So he is fairly tall, taller than most corners. With his size, he might be able to contest better. And he has amazing speed too, if needed.
by statcruncher on Dec 30, 2011 11:42 AM EST up reply actions
My first thought as I read the article was “Easley.” It sure hurt the team not having him this year. Hope for his sake and the Bills’ sake that he can come back strong and healthy.
Give a monkey a typewriter and infinite time, and he’ll eventually release Maybin. -- stetzwebs
No one circles the waiver wire like the Buffalo Bills!
by thefourwinds on Dec 30, 2011 3:22 PM EST up reply actions
yes, Hardy was drafted for that purpose… he was tall and fast but he was lanky… his problem was he was inconsistent which was in his scouting reports pre-draft… i wonder why we would even draft him in the 2nd round knowing his flags…
and guys who are freaks like him – tall, big and really fast are also usually injury prone… they are too much out of the norm that their body gives up
by statcruncher on Dec 30, 2011 11:45 AM EST up reply actions
Michael Floyd
fixed it! :)
I always mix those 2 up
LOL – perfect write-up otherwise! Good stuff
by BuffaloRepresent on Dec 30, 2011 11:47 AM EST up reply actions
Okay but with what pick is the question. What kind of pick are you willing to spend on him? Remember he does have the three DWIs. He is one strike away from his career being over and him being in jail for some time. I would be willing to give him a chance if he was available anywhere from the 6th round-7th round or as a free agent. Nothing before that.
He has one DWI. The other two alcohol incidents were citations for underage drinking that he got for drinking at parties at the age of 20 which were broken up by police. I don’t think NFL teams will care at all about the two citations because every college athlete not named Tim Tebow drinks at campus parties.
The DW is more serious. As a result, he did have to have a breathalyzer installed in his car, so he hasn’t done any drinking and driving at all since then, at least not in his own car. Teams will look into his drinking and most likely will decide that he is just young and lacked some discretion and made one huge mistake. Either that or they’ll look into his background and decide he has a problem with alcohol and nobody will draft him early. But he’s nowhere near jail time or even a suspension from the NFL (barring something pretty serious) and I’d guess that NFL teams won’t consider his alcohol related issues to be a red flag.
"You mean @TWHITNER. It’s how he prefers to be referenced." - Jon Harrington
You are correct about it not being three DWIs. That is so weird. Either I misread it or they changed what they had there.
Maybe substituting "arrests" for "incidents".
We have this nugget:
"After receiving a third-round grade from the NFL Draft advisory board last year, Floyd slimmed down and became a much more dynamic receiver. More importantly, after three alcohol-related incidents sine 2009, Floyd also hasn’t had any offseason issues."
.
.
When the job is finished no one remembers how long it took, just how well it was performed.
by Buffalo for Eternity on Dec 30, 2011 9:02 PM EST up reply actions
yea, i still say he might not go in the first round because of the character issues. The Character issues knocked Mallet out of the first round last year.
Are we drafting Dino's now?
"6'6" monster receiver with a Terradactyl wingspan "....... Keysh67
by Billsfanstuckinthesouth on Dec 31, 2011 8:28 AM EST up reply actions
What about Alshon Jeffery?
Very big, definitely not a speedster, but productive.
You are now Watching The Throne.
yes
i fell in love with jeffery last year but he dropped off this year… if nix is thinking WR in the first round, i would be fine with either floyd or jeffery
by statcruncher on Dec 30, 2011 12:47 PM EST up reply actions
yea
I think that is due to QB play, they had Garcia but they got rid of him and put in Shaw. They also lost their great RB Lattimore- who is good receiver out of the back field. I think Jeffery would be a good run blocker and a great asset to have in the redzone or really anywhere due to his height and athletic ability. Depending on who is available and what pick we have Jeffery could be a good choice. Although as you said there are other later round guys who could do the same thing, and are faster, but we will Jeffery’s speed at the combine.I would rather take a CB than WR in the 1st though. Like Kirkpatrick or Claiborne if available.
You are now Watching The Throne.
Watching some of his highlights it looks like Jeffery definitely puts an effort into downfield blocking.
Da'Jon McKnight - WR (Minnesota) - 6'3'' 211Lbs. (5th Round)
1st Round Targets: Courtney Upshaw 3-4 OLB, Alshon Jeffery WR, David DeCastro OG, Justin Blackmon WR, Ryan Tannehill QB, Sam Montgomery 3-4 OLB
2nd Round Targets: Jared Crick (3-4DE & 4-3LDE), Melvin Ingram 3-4OLB, Kirk Cousins QB
by NordicBillsfan on Dec 30, 2011 2:44 PM EST up reply actions
yea i think he would be a great fit
and Fitz probably can’t overthrow his height on a slant…
You are now Watching The Throne.
I like Justin Blackmon the most of any WR in the draft, the guy is a freak. I’d be fine with Floyd and Jeffrey, but Blackmon is my hands down favorite in the draft.
"What it takes to win is simple, it's not easy."
-Marv Levy
he would be the best if he falls down to no.10 like crabtree fell down in 2009… but it looks like he is going to go in the top 4 picks…
by statcruncher on Dec 30, 2011 3:05 PM EST up reply actions
Blackmon is a top 5 pick in this draft.
There’s no chance that we have any shot at landing him.
WE NEED RG3!!!!!
by CanadianBillsFan on Dec 30, 2011 6:22 PM EST up reply actions
Floyd if he drops to us...
Would be a great pick. And I think that we can get a situational pass rusher in the second and develop him into a full time OLB.
WE NEED RG3!!!!!
by CanadianBillsFan on Dec 30, 2011 6:21 PM EST up reply actions
Sorry Statcruncher
but why don’t you like Joe Adams? He would be a perfect fit in this offense and turn 15 yard passes into long TD runs. Remember, Chan had plans for Roscoe in this offense, but he can’t stay healthy to use. If all the highly rated Juniors do declare, he would make for a nice 3rd round pick. Even if some dont, a 2nd round pick is definitely worth a 5’11, 4.35 guy that can also return punts and kickoffs also.
Are we drafting Dino's now?
"6'6" monster receiver with a Terradactyl wingspan "....... Keysh67
by Billsfanstuckinthesouth on Dec 30, 2011 3:23 PM EST reply actions
roscoe was going to be used from the slot… that’s not what we need… for slot, joe adams will be just a luxury pick…
we need a Z receiver who is compatible with fitz…. even if we draft joe, fitz is incapable of throwing it to him….it will be a wasted pick… obviously we get enamored by speed but it has to work in our offense
by statcruncher on Dec 30, 2011 4:03 PM EST up reply actions
I understand what your saying. But i don’t agree, we have a ton of receivers that are great possesion receivers, what we lack is the explosive plays in the passing game. Why? We lack the speed element. The current passing game has the ability to move the chains, just like the Saints, what we lack is the speed element that the Saints have in some of there receivers.
Are we drafting Dino's now?
"6'6" monster receiver with a Terradactyl wingspan "....... Keysh67
by Billsfanstuckinthesouth on Dec 30, 2011 4:14 PM EST up reply actions
A guy like Meachem would fit in well
But I dont agree with you that much because Fitz is not good at throwing the deep ball. A lot of his throws are less than 15 yards down field, which is fine and just the style of the offense. I think a guy like Jeffery would be a good fit to this offense, as would a faster guy like Meachem.
You are now Watching The Throne.
yea, i guess that is what i’m thinking as well. If you could add a Meachem, that i’m not sure about his height , thinking he is 6’2 or 6’3 and around a 4.4 guy, add him in free agency, draft a speed guy to replace Roscoe that is bigger version of him in Adams, now we are cooking and adding the explosive element of turning 10 passes into big gainers.
Are we drafting Dino's now?
"6'6" monster receiver with a Terradactyl wingspan "....... Keysh67
by Billsfanstuckinthesouth on Dec 30, 2011 4:48 PM EST up reply actions
that’s a fact which the bills will have to live with… fitz just cant exploit a guy like desean jackson….joe adams will be wasted here and we will all be still scratching our heads…
our speed element has to come from spiller from the backfield… who can be like darren sproles if needed
by statcruncher on Dec 30, 2011 4:44 PM EST up reply actions
I know what you are saying bro, i wish we had a stronger arm at QB, but Brees does it with route combinations with his speed receivers. The pass was only 25 yards, the receivers turn it into a 50 yard TD. If Fritz can’t hit a 25 yard pass and let the receiver turn on the jets for those yac yards then he should have never been resigned.
Are we drafting Dino's now?
"6'6" monster receiver with a Terradactyl wingspan "....... Keysh67
by Billsfanstuckinthesouth on Dec 30, 2011 4:51 PM EST up reply actions
rec'd
exactly why most of the routes are quick slants. Fitz can’t be trusted to throw the ball down the field. this is also why having such success with Fred and now CJ is so important to this offense. if we can’t run the ball with a high percentage of success, then we can’t expect Fitz to win the game for us with his arm. he just can’t do it. he may have the will and desire to do it, but he doesn’t have the tools to nor the decision making skills to match. we NEED a top notch QB more than any other position. Fitz simply cannot get it done alone. guys go down throughout the course of the season. thats when your “stars/leaders” are supposed to shine. we need a QB with the “gimme the rock” mentality when it’s crunch-time. Those guys were, Tebow (if the game’s close, watch out), Cam Newton (smh @ what could have been) and now RG3. Unfortunately, we didn’t think Tebow was worth the #9 pick so we grabbed a luxury guy in Spiller (when apparently we tried to move back into the 1st to get Tebow. Why we didn’t trade down out of the #9 slot to get assure we got him, I’ll never know.) Last yr we didn’t suck enough to get Cam, and same goes for this yr when looking at RG3. We will be in a bidding war to beat out Miami, Washington, Clevland, and possibly Sea to trade up for him. No way Nix does it. He’s too conservative. So, we’ll go another yr with Fitz at the helm. Here’s hoping he doesn’t get injured b/c if Fitz is bad then Thigpen is just pathetic!
are you seriously pissed off for not getting tebow? he sucked before we beat him, he sucks still….
by statcruncher on Dec 31, 2011 12:47 PM EST up reply actions
(when apparently we tried to move back into the 1st to get Tebow. Why we didn’t trade down out of the #9 slot to get assure we got him, I’ll never know.)
Or we were after Dan Williams
flayed ones stealth mode
"Fleshling! Do not shoot! For I am one of you fleshy things. It is I. Your Uncle Stan. Can't you tell by the long strips of fleshy substances covered in bodily fluids? Trust me! I have fleeeeeeeeesh."
I think this is the point stat is trying to make...
This shows how Fitz is connecting on only 27% of the deep passes.
It’s not that we DON’T need an explosive burner, the problem is Fitz’ inability to connect on deep balls efficient enough to keep defenses honest. In that case, having a big, physical possession WR with enough speed to create separation will should make it much easier for Fitz to connect.
It sounds to me that our most dire need (outside of a pass rusher) is not at the WR position, but a QB who won’t keep us one-dimensional. Fitz, you are the weakest link. Goodbye!
I agree
I would rather a tall, not-as-speedy receiver to go beat up on CBs than a speedster, since Fitz underthrows a lot of deep throws anyway. I don’t know who I would want, a FA or a draftee, either would be fine with me. I just want someone who will contribute in a meaningful way next year and take some of the pressure off of Nelson and Stevie.
"Slowly all the roles we act out become our identity. And in the end we are what we pretend to be." - Jerry Cantrell.
Completely agree that Easley would be perfect to fill the Z role but since he has yet to play a regular season snap, it’s a little hard to rely on him as you said. Three guys came to mind when reading your description: Michael Floyd, Alshon Jeffrey, and a name I haven’t seen listed on here yet, Dwight Jones from North Carolina. At 6’4" 225 he has the required height and has been timed at 4.43. First round I could see Floyd as the pick if they clear him on his drinking history. Second round I could see Jeffrey or Jones if either are there for the pick.
Punt?! In our moment of triumph?! I think you overestimate their chances!!
Chan Gailey to Brian Moorman
by TexasBillsFanatic on Dec 30, 2011 4:23 PM EST reply actions
great post
I think Juron Criner has potential as a later round prospect. Big guy that can really compete downfield. Needs to work on run-blocking though.
yes
he could be a good option… read a couple good reports on him
by statcruncher on Dec 30, 2011 4:45 PM EST up reply actions
Outside of Jeffery, Dwight Jones, and Floyd(who I don’t like at all) there is a huge gap to the next tall semi speedy receiver in the draft, I’m not really sure there is another. Criner and Fuller are 4.6 guys and aren’t quick, If we picked one of the two in the 3rd or fourth I’d want Criner over Fuller. Criner seems like a better WR plain and simple, and I think Fuller is converted to WR from QB.
I’d be very happy with Alshon Jeffery in the first round, the guy was a beast last season, put up huge numbers against top compitition, is a big, quick, and hardworking football player.
We have an elite pass rushing LB who likes to conserve electrcity-Munchausen
you have 2 remember
we need a no.2 not no.1…. if you want a tall speed physical guy who is proven, no way you will get him in the 4th round…
i am perfectly fine with fuller or mcnutt
by statcruncher on Dec 30, 2011 7:23 PM EST up reply actions
I see your point stat, I just feel like if we are going to draft a WR, we should aim high.
We have an elite pass rushing LB who likes to conserve electrcity-Munchausen
by cencalclassics on Dec 31, 2011 2:56 PM EST up reply actions
Not to highjack, but the post has slowed down, how do you feel about whitney Mercilus in the first. He is my favorite out of the op DE/OLB prospects.
We have an elite pass rushing LB who likes to conserve electrcity-Munchausen
by cencalclassics on Dec 31, 2011 6:14 PM EST up reply actions
i have liked him since end october
i thought he might be a one year wonder but during the bowl game they were saying he is not just one trick pony and has a lot of moves… plus he is good against the run as well…
the fear is he might be aaron maybin but he is much bigger than him… he is 6’4 265 crazy athleticism and fast… he might be more like aldon smith…
by statcruncher on Dec 31, 2011 7:46 PM EST up reply actions
to summarize…i would be happy if we take him at no.10
by statcruncher on Dec 31, 2011 7:46 PM EST up reply actions
I'd be happy with either Mercilus or Perry
in the first, followed by Tannehill, or Foles in the second. And I think one of those guys will be available in the second. (Probably Foles)
flayed ones stealth mode
"Fleshling! Do not shoot! For I am one of you fleshy things. It is I. Your Uncle Stan. Can't you tell by the long strips of fleshy substances covered in bodily fluids? Trust me! I have fleeeeeeeeesh."
I read somewhere in a report that Jeffrey was a lazy route runner. Has anybody else heard that? I don’t want a James Hardy remix on the squad next yr! haha!!
I wouldn’t say lazy, I would say unpolished. Coaching can fix the route running.
We have an elite pass rushing LB who likes to conserve electrcity-Munchausen
by cencalclassics on Dec 31, 2011 2:55 PM EST up reply actions
Great write up, rec'd
And i think your exactly right, a guy like Desean Jackson (or Robert Meachem) would be absolutely useless for us because of Fitzy down field accuracy.
We do need a BIG receiver with good (not necessarily great) speed in the Vincent Jackson mold would be the best fit for us. And short of actually signing Jackson himself I think that the best player for that role for us would be drafting Micheal Floyd in the first round.
WE NEED RG3!!!!!
by CanadianBillsFan on Dec 30, 2011 6:28 PM EST reply actions
X+Y+Z =
Doesn’t really matter if you have a Tom Brady, Aaron Rodgers, or Drew Brees – Now does it? the Pats win with two tight ends – That theory makes no sense!
It makes sense 100%
its not theory its how the system is.The pats play a different system. You could correlate 3 receivers on most teams that run a multi WR offense with this system.
You are now Watching The Throne.
draft or free agents?
It’s a big need, but we won’t find an immediate impact in the draft outside the first round. We could really use that pick to grab some help on defense…
I say we go at it in free agency… It’s a strong class this year: Wayne, V. Jackson, Colston, Meachem, Welker, Desean, Manningham…
I agree that a speedster isn’t what we need- so no to Desean or Manningham… Welker would be nice but won’t leave NE… Wayne is too old to ink to big money…
That leaves V. Jackson, Colston, and Meachem…
Colston probably won’t leave NO to go to a below .500 team… Jackson could command big money, which Nix may pay the ex-Charger but more than likely it’s too much… I think Meachem is the guy- big, strong, fast, and cheaper than the other guys who will attract big contracts. I think he could shine in Chan’s system.
Excellent Post
Really enjoyed it. Never knew about the X Y Z WRs but I’m glad I do now and the purpose f each WR
Kenny Powers is back!
hate to burst the bubble
but did you actually look at the numbers for NFL qb long ball percentages,
because they are generally in that range.
the long ball is by definition a low percentage play.
this nonsense that Fitz cannot throw the deep ball is pathetic.
He had no problem hitting TO deep. he hit stevie in the hands on a 50 yd
toss to win the game against the steelers…..
of course, it is in keeping with the new theme, Fitz is bad, therefore
speed will not help blah blah blah……
by simonpure on Dec 31, 2011 5:24 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
speed will help
but Fitz just isn’t accurate. He throws the ball under 15 yards most of the time.
You are now Watching The Throne.
the article breaking down long ball for 2010
by simonpure on Dec 31, 2011 10:57 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Thanks for the link.
.
When the job is finished no one remembers how long it took, just how well it was performed.
by Buffalo for Eternity on Dec 31, 2011 4:10 PM EST up reply actions
really?
now fitz being bad is a new theme? it has nothing to do with… well, fitz being bad…
he is being in the league 7 years and even before that he wasnt known for his arm… its a new theme now?
And in your own stat, the league average is 33%, the league best is 46% and fitz is 29%… he is full below 6% of the average… so instead of an average 60% thrower if fitz was 54% would you say he is not bad? 54% is horrible…
only bubble here is the one you are sitting in
by statcruncher on Dec 31, 2011 12:56 PM EST up reply actions
here are some stats from the long ball piece
tom brady, 18 of 49
fitz, 20 of 69
jay cutler, 17 of 64
alex smith, 9 of 36
joe flacco, 26 of 86
brett favre, 15 of 46
josh freeman, 23 of 72
Big Ben, 25 of 69
peyton manning, 29 of 95
top 10 percentages, vince young (#1, david garrard (#2) , kerry collins #8)…..
derek anderson (#9)
4 of the top 10 are not even backups anymore……….
lots of noise, not much information……
by simonpure on Dec 31, 2011 3:39 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
last yr people said fitz had low completion percentage
this yr it is not the case, he actually was top 3 in percentage completed for most of the yr, so now it is he cannot complete the long ball.
next yr it will be he cannot throw the out pattern.
in 2013 it will be he needs to learn to scramble better.
of course, there seems to be a disconnect between what fitz does and who
he is throwing to, and for how many quarters he has actually had these guys
he is throwing to running deep pátterns….
i remember kelly being pretty good with the long ball, and i also remember he
was throwing to 1 or 2 guys for most of his career.
fitz has had no stability deep…..
of course, he can and should get better, but these stats really are much about
nothing, esp when some of the best deep ball throwers in 2010 cannot even get
on the field in 2011..
by simonpure on Jan 1, 2012 12:02 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
last yr people said fitz had low completion percentage
They said that because he did have a low completion percentage. He had a low comp% because he struggled throwing the ball down the field. The link you provided shows that both in numbers and in the authors written analysis. The Bills tried to throw down the field last year with an Evans/Johnson receiver combo and no TE to speak of. It was a failure of a plan because Fitz was so inefficient throwing the ball further than 15 yards.
this yr it is not the case, he actually was top 3 in percentage completed for most of the yr, so now it is he cannot complete the long ball.
His completion percentage is high because they’re hardly trying to throw the deep ball. Fitz is struggling with those throws, just like last year (I’d actually guess his downfield numbers are even worse this year with Evans gone). His comp% is high because he’s throwing so many short passes.
The number that ties it all together is yards per pass attempt. You want to see what kind of QB Fitz is, check out his ypa. It was almost exactly 6.8 last season, which is a below average number for the position. The 2010 number was low because his comp % was really bad while his ypa was average due to Buffalo throwing so many times down the field (which, again, your link shows). This year, his yards per attempt is another below average 6.7 and change. That stat is bad this year because, despite a solid comp%, his yards per completion is pathetic, because he’s been so bad throwing down the field.
Bills fans aren’t making up complaints about Fitz. His struggles down the field are real. They’re the root of his statistical mediocrity. They’re the reason that Buffalo is running this shotgun, ball comes out quick, Fitz doesn’t get sacked much (why have your QB hold onto the ball if something positive is rarely going to come of it?), spread the ball around to everybody offense that Gailey has installed.
"You mean @TWHITNER. It’s how he prefers to be referenced." - Jon Harrington
by kaisertown on Jan 1, 2012 6:42 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
brady and manning two of the lowest long ball completion percentages
it is a stat with more noise than information
fitz threw a high percentage of long balls, and completed
fewer percentage wise.——-
all this has nothing to do with the kind of receiver speed we need——-
heck, sign wes walker, he is a free agent, who needs deep passes
to score from 80 and 90 yds out————

by 






























