Draft strategy for long term
In the past few weeks we have seen several mock drafts. There are several different draft strategies that appeal to individuals. Some like to address the most pressing need first and some want to go BPA. Some want to draft a combination of both and some want to draft by gut feel.
But all these approaches fail to address the long term direction of the team. Drafting for need could fix the issue, till another need opens up. And what if the draft pick doesnt pan out? Now you would have two weaknesses instead of one.
Drafting BPA could also make you stockpile talent on one position while not addressing the other positions. Since this is a team sport, the excess talent at one position, say WR, may not be utilized due to weakness at other positions...
So I dug deeper to come up with a strategy. Suppose we build only through draft. Suppose we are so good, we can hit on every draft position. There are 11 positions in defense and 11 positions in offense. Suppose you want to draft a 1st round talent at every position, it would take you 22 years to build the team and the cycle to repeat again. Not even Brett Favre played for 22 years. So there is no way you can build a team of 1st rounders through draft unless you are a wizard in trading every year.
Next best thing would be to build a team of 1st and 2nd rounders. That would give a player an average career of 11 years after which you can start to re-draft the same positions. 11 year career span is much more possible. Many would bring the statistic that the average career of an NFL player is 3.5 years. That is meaningless since it includes busts like maybin, injured players like everett and talentless undrafted players. If you are good at scouting, you can pick players who can have a career of 11 years.
If you assume you can hit on every pick, you can build a team with just 2 rounds in the draft every year. Now since we can obviously be not perfect in the picks, we have rounds 3 to UDFAs and the free agency to address mistakes in the draft, shortened player careers, weaknesses/ needs in team, depth, special teams and everything... i would be very happy if i have 3rd and 4th rounders as depth if possible...
Now that we have defined our strategy, lets look at what the Bills did in the first 2 rounds in the last 10 years to identify what needs to be done in the first 2 rounds in the 11th year...
2001
rd1 - nate clements, cb
rd2 - aaron schobel, olb ( i am putting him as olb instead of de for convenience)
rd2 - travis henry, rb
2002
rd1 - mike williams, lt
rd2 - josh reed, wr
rd2 - ryan denney, olb
2003
rd1 - willis mcgahee, rb
rd2 - chris kelsay, olb
2004
rd1 - lee evans, wr
rd1 - j p losman, qb
2005
rd2 - roscoe parrish, wr
2006
rd1 - donte whitner, ss
rd1 - john mccargo, de
2007
rd1 - marshawn lynch, rb
rd2 - paul posluzny, ilb
2008
rd1 - mckelvin, cb
rd2 - james hardy, wr
2009
rd1 - maybin, olb
rd1 - wood, c
rd2 - byrd, fs
rd2 - levitre, lg
2010
rd1 - spiller, rb
rd2 - troup, nt
In the last 10 years, we have drafted 4 WRs, 4 RBs, 4 OLBs, positions which are over-drafted. Then we drafted 2 CBs, 1 LT, 1 QB, 1 SS, 1C, 1FS, 1LG, 1NT, positions which were drafted correct amount.
Then we drafted 1DE, 1ILB, 0RG, 0RT, 0TE, positions which were under-drafted. Hmmm, can anyone see where our problems lie? Hint: run defense, pass protection, TE production... you can say our OLBs we drafted are weaknesses too.. so you can keep drafting that position or you can address in rd3 or rd4...
If I were the GM, I would draft these positions in the first 2 rounds, DE, TE, ILB, OG, OT and draft for weaknesses the remaining rounds
My draft:
#3 - marcell dareus, de
rd2 - kyle rudolph, te or ilb, og, ot
rd3 - colin kaepernick, qb
rd4 - ilb
rd4b - marcus gilbert, ot
rd5 - joe lefeged, ss
rd6 - jamie harper, rb
rd7 - chris culliver, cb
One major issue you would find with the bills here is they let good players walk even after they prove they are good. they let clements and henry walk. schobel might not have retired if we were good. poz could walk. whitner is most likely going to walk. that just needs to stop.
Hey, we can draft a 5th WR in 11 years, or a 3rd CB. Or we can draft another QB and force him to work with a talentless team or we can draft a player we are smitten by and we have got to have him because he is supposedly that once in a 20 years player that comes out every year. Or we can think of the long term and draft the positions we have fallen behind.
I think dareus is like a cog that can fix our defense and we still get a top TE and kaepernick in this draft. And we should really try hard to resign poz, whitner and florence just so that the team has continuity.
Just another great fan opinion shared on the pages of BuffaloRumblings.com.
18 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
fixed
i dont want a 4th round pick to be the focus of this article
I see what you are saying here but it isn’t logical because of free agency. You can’t say we don’t need a CB because we drafted Nate Clements in 2001, that doesn’t make sense. This whole article is based on the idea that you build a good team with 1st and 2nd rounders only. You’re saying we should only consider DE, ILB, TE, OG and OT in the 1st 2 rds? I’m just confused with your argument.
it is perfectly logical… free agency should be used to fix the issues you create… your own example, letting clements go was a mistake… fix it with free agency or lower round draft picks instead of AGAIN draft another CB in the first 2 round within a few years…
you say there is a need for CB, but we created that need… this way you will never build a team…
you are saying CB is a need, I am saying DE, ILB, TE, OG, OT are positions which are also weaknesses which havent even be addressed in more than 11 years… fix that first
I'm confussed
Why change players that were drafted as and played as DE to LB’s? That seems change the rational.
"Sit down and watch my Buffalo Bills destroy your Kingdome" - Abayarde
So you’re advocating an 11-year plan when building a team? And you think CHIX should enter this off-season as if it’s year 11 of that plan instead of year 2? I don’t get why who we drafted in 2001 should matter to the current decision makers; those players aren’t even on the team anymore.
2001 might seem ancient history, but when you are running a franchise your vision should not be just 1-2 years ahead or behind… a lot of players from 10-11 years back are still playing… the player we drafted, nate clements is still playing in the league… and that answers your second question… he is not even on the team anymore, and that’s a bad thing… he should have been in the team still…
if Nix drafts players in the first 2 rounds with the idea that they will be here 11 years from now obviously they are part of the plan in 2021 and the 2021 draft would be drafted accordingly…
yes… in a way i am advocating a 11 year plan
by statcruncher on Feb 9, 2011 8:44 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
I don’t disagree with your idea at all. I actually like it because the only way to execute such a long-term plan is to have continuity with the front office and coaching staff; something we have lacked.
My only issue is that if the current decision makers were to execute an 11 year plan, as unlikely as that is, we’d be going into the 2nd year of that plan and not the 11th. I don’t get why players drafted by different decision makers for different schemes, and some not even on the team anymore, should influence this years draft.
I have another take on your analysis which is that RBs and WRs are not good values in the first couple rounds – you can find talented RBs and WRs in later rounds or as UFAs as we saw this year. It would be interesting to see this same analysis for the Steelers and Pats – guarantee they’ve loaded up on the O-line inc. TE and Defense in those first three rounds. If you build the O-Line and Defense, you build a team for the long term – you just interchange the skill players. Think about New England – they’ve plugged and played receivers and RBs for years while always having a strong O-line, good TEs and a solid Defense….and a franchise QB! Bottom line is that a solid long-term plan starts in the trenches and on D.
I like Rudolph in the 2nd – he would be huge for our O – he would be a bigger impact than Green! I definitely want an ILB in the third though and maybe hope Kaepernick falls to the 4th….
This is really trippy
As I’m not sure I get the point but I love the draft…
"This is what happens Larry!, This is what happens! "-Walter Sobchak" "Did we give up when the germans bombed pearl harbor!!??"-John Belushi
by BigEasyBillsKrewe on Feb 9, 2011 11:27 PM EST reply actions
I like
The idea that you should plan on having a guy 10 years after hes drafted is good. I also find it quite interesting that we havent used a 1st or 2nd rd pick on the very positions we so desperately need. Im not on the QB wagon, but you pointed out we havent used a 1 or 2 on that position other than JP in at least ten years. That there should tell us we need to invest in a QB soon and early. I like it, cool insight
"War Memorial Stadium looks as if whatever war it was a memorial to had been fought within its confines."-Brock Yates

by 

































