Buddy Nix Approval Poll: March 2011
At the start of every month, we're going to poll the readers of Buffalo Rumblings on their state of mind regarding the chief decision-makers of the Buffalo Bills. This is your poll to state your pleasure, or lack thereof, with GM Buddy Nix. Here are some stories Nix has been heavily involved with over the last month.
- Released Marcus Stroud, as well as linebackers Pierre Woods and Mike Balogun; Re-signed specialist Jon Corto
- Hosted Bob Sanders on a free agent visit, and will reportedly do so with O.J. Atogwe, as well; Said of possibly re-signing free agent safety Donte Whitner: "That's up to Donte"
- Discussed Shawne Merriman's health, outside linebackers, and the future of Aaron Maybin
- Continued his public support of Ryan Fitzpatrick, but is reportedly high on Cameron Newton
- Broke down Bills' defensive needs, and also discussed the unlikelihood of trading down
- Reportedly discussed trade for OT Ryan Harris during 2010 season
Previous Five Approval Polls
27% approval October 2010 (49% disapproval)
55% approval November 2010 (23% disapproval)
77% approval December 2010 (5% disapproval)
70% approval January 2011 (12% disapproval)
73% approval February 2011 (9% disapproval)
72 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
He's just getting started.
YOU ARE OUT of you kuku fufu mine craker laker Flaber baber FUNKI chunki brain. WE want to winn every year -- abayarde
I approve!
Mainly because the resigning of Corto and the aggresive approach of levereging himself against Donte’s childish tactics.
I predict that May will be Buddy Nix’s highest approval poll ever possibly eclispsing 80% because I have confidence that this guy knows how to draft and will prove it come April.
and why is that?
Is that based off his success with the last draft he had? And lets not use the success of the Chargers draft class, because he wasn’t the one making the last call.
If we look at his 1st draft with the Bills, I would not agree with that statement.
So far, I have to grade the Bills draft last season as a D..
Why D
Why are u giving Buddy a D for last years draft? CJ, Troup, and Carrington are all expected to give quality playing time next year…also Easley and Batten are coming back off injuries…if you really look at it… it was a pretty solid draft…there arent any severe misses and i still believe CJ will become the focal point of the offense and a stud back…..
ok I agree they didnt a whole lot on the field, but the emergence of Carrington allowed for the release of Marcus Stroud. I found it refreshing to have a solid draft pick that could replace a veteran. just out of curiosity if the Bills draft was far from solid then who in your eyes did have a solid draft? There arent a whole lot of teams that have multiple draft picks give immeadiate impact during their 1st year…rookies arent or shouldnt be expected to be stars as soon as they are drafted. only time will tell whether a draft class is “solid” but as I said before there is solid expectations for last year class this year….
but the emergence of Carrington allowed for the release of Marcus Stroud
I would argue that underwhelming performance at a $4.5 million price tag allowed for the release of Stroud, and the team is hoping they have a young guy to replace him with. That’s the feeling I get, anyway.
Editor-in-Chief, BUFFALO RUMBLINGS®
@BrianGalliford
by Brian Galliford on Mar 1, 2011 4:04 PM EST up reply actions
I agree about Whitner. I like the hard stance he’s taken with him, though I hope they can work out a suitable deal.
"Slowly all the roles we act out become our identity. And in the end we are what we pretend to be." - Jerry Cantrell.
A.J. Smith Jr?
"Adversity is an opportunity for heroism." Marv Levy.
by SERGEANT MAJOR THOR on Mar 1, 2011 8:02 PM EST up reply actions
I approve
But if he has a chance to swap out Maybin for a better prospect in the draft, he ought to do it. Sometimes you gotta give up and move on. Aside from his continued devotion to maybin, I have no issues with Nix.
Plus, he always gives a fun interview.
All my arguments against Chan Gailey...............
can be put right here for Nix.
The score dictated they pass
by norcaliangelsfan on Mar 1, 2011 12:18 PM EST reply actions
No, please repeat them.
YOU ARE OUT of you kuku fufu mine craker laker Flaber baber FUNKI chunki brain. WE want to winn every year -- abayarde
ditto
"Welcome back my friends to the show that never ends. We're so glad you could attend, come inside, come inside" - ELP
not sure
It’s so difficult for me to judge GM until he’s had a couple years and how the players develop.
It’s like the president – you can’t do a ton of bashing or complimenting until he’s out of office and his policies have time to take hold and see if they do what was intended, or wanted.
I do, however, like the fact that he took NT, DE, LB, LB because building depth and establishing a strong defense is how I would also start building a team.
If approval was simply formulaic from wins and losses, there wouldn’t be a point to the poll and there wouldn’t be a very interesting conversation. - greysquirrel
also,
voting prior to a second offseason or draft is a little premature for bashing and complimenting.
YOU ARE OUT of you kuku fufu mine craker laker Flaber baber FUNKI chunki brain. WE want to winn every year -- abayarde
Why?
The NFL is a show-me league. So far Buddy has showed me nothing. Results are the only thing that matters.
by twoeightnine on Mar 1, 2011 12:51 PM EST up reply actions
Will disapprove until he proves otherwise
He’s basically in the same position as last month. Nothing has really changed. He’s still talking about liking his OLB’s and for some reason expecting a fully healthy Merriman. He’s made moves that are obvious (releasing Stroud, talking up the current QB, etc). He’s still talking up the needs this team has. And I still don’t get the feeling he has actual plans to fill them or do so effectively. Same as last month. Probably the same as next month.
It’s going to come down to whether he can actually put together a quality offseason to get this team headed in the right direction. I’ll believe he has a plan when he actually follows it AND builds it properly. This team has so far to go and cannot afford to blow and draft picks this year. There are opportunities to really improve the roster this offseason; Nix just has to do it now.
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Mar 1, 2011 12:38 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
I agree although I just said not sure
Its too early to judge one way or the other really. I was surprised at how many people have “approved” when there are still so many questions and holes.
by S2 on Mar 1, 2011 12:45 PM EST up reply actions
is reportedly high on Cameron Newton
Voted not sure just because of that line.
The Buffalo Bills, finding new and exciting ways to lose since January 8th, 2000.
by CanadianBillsFan on Mar 1, 2011 1:13 PM EST reply actions
DISAPPROVE!
CJ over Bulaga,
I am not a hard disapprove, but if he takes Cam Newton, I’m taking collections for the fire Buddy billboard I will be putting on the 190.
Kylesaurus Rex Williams Pro Bowl 2010
Count me in.
The Buffalo Bills, finding new and exciting ways to lose since January 8th, 2000.
by CanadianBillsFan on Mar 1, 2011 1:47 PM EST up reply actions
The billboard is officially cliche. Get creative!
Editor-in-Chief, BUFFALO RUMBLINGS®
@BrianGalliford
by Brian Galliford on Mar 1, 2011 2:03 PM EST up reply actions
OK
30 minute show per week on cable public access and a full page ad stating why he should be fired in the buffalo news once enough cash was raised.
Kylesaurus Rex Williams Pro Bowl 2010
by The Buffalo Kid on Mar 2, 2011 6:00 AM EST up reply actions
I understand why you're dissatisfied...
and I’m not Buddy’s biggest fan, but don’t you think a sign might be a bit premature? Spiller and Troup might come around… Merriman might be able to stay healthy….
I think we ought to give these things more time before we start calling for someone’s head. While the outlook doesn’t look good, there’s a chance that Buddy might have been right about everything. Just as we shouldn’t give up on a rookie after his first year, I think the same could be said of a GM.
and I’m not Buddy’s biggest fan, but don’t you think a sign might be a bit premature?
As I said above, that is only if he drafts Cam Newton at #3 that would be the final straw for me. A sure sign Nix has no business in the NFL as a GM. I didn’t like Tebow as a prospect, when asked about trading back into the first round for Tebow and Nix said Tebow wasn’t the guy they were trying to get. All the reasons he gave for not taking Tebow apply to Newton. Newton may not have the elongated throwing motion, but many more issues than Tebow overall, to take Newton at #3 is in my eyes insanity.
Kylesaurus Rex Williams Pro Bowl 2010
by The Buffalo Kid on Mar 2, 2011 5:58 AM EST up reply actions
Not Sure
If he draft’s C. Newton …….Disapprove !
by mr3857 on Mar 1, 2011 1:46 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
Disapprove for the same reasons I always vote disapprove.
The Kelsay resign was a joke.
I thought the Merriman signing was as bad or worse than the Kelsay resign. I still don’t think people understand just how much guaranteed money Merriman got. He’s basically a lock to get 8.25 mil from the Bills (Mark Gaughan’s number). I wonder how far that would have gone towards resigning a young player like Steve Johnson or Demetrius Bell.
IMO, the Spiller selection, the two signings I didn’t like, the hosting of these 30 year old safeties (under the assumption that Buddy is willing to pay good money for them and isn’t just kicking the tires), the 3-4 vs. 4-3 uncertainty and the general way that things seem to be done all indicate that the long term plan here is to try and make the playoffs as quickly as possible and then try to build a long term core at the same time. I think that’s a failing strategy. I just don’t like the direction that I believe Buddy is taking the team in.
"You mean @TWHITNER. It’s how he prefers to be referenced." - Jon Harrington
by kaisertown on Mar 1, 2011 1:58 PM EST reply actions 3 recs
Since when is there an uncertainty about the 3-4 vs 4-3?? I thought they were using both??
by Winnie33 on Mar 1, 2011 2:00 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Isn't that the very definition of uncertainty?
We don’t know which we’re suited for so we’re going hybrid.
Precisely
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Mar 1, 2011 2:17 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
well then teams like Baltimore and New England are uncertain as well because they both do a lot of 3-4 and 4-3 looks.
I think the Bills are actually ahead of with the curve on this for a change. They are transitioning to a 3-4 predominately but they have 4-3 players at positions and having the ability to mask and disguise your defense is a great thing.
plus I think this gives them more mobility to draft guys that are potentially great players but might not fit as well in a 3-4 or a 4-3.
If approval was simply formulaic from wins and losses, there wouldn’t be a point to the poll and there wouldn’t be a very interesting conversation. - greysquirrel
by J2 on Mar 1, 2011 2:44 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Ahead of what curve?
Its not like the Bills defense has had amazing results due to running both schemes.
The Bills have players who haven’t been successful in either scheme, but who’s skills fit a 4-3 better. That’s why they’ve been forced to run both even if the 3-4 is preferred.
You build a defense first, around the scheme you want to run and then transition to different looks. The Bills are doing the opposite due to a lack of talent. I don’t see how that’s ahead of any proverbial curve. Its setting yourself up for disaster if there are players who only fit one scheme, which we are littered with whether they are 3-4 or 4-3 fits….
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Mar 1, 2011 3:44 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Ahead of what curve?
ahead of the curve like teams like KC that run just a straight 3-4 so teams that know how to attack those defenses have an easier time because they know what alignments they are going to be in.
You build a defense first, around the scheme you want to run and then transition to different looks
why? because you said so? so drafting Troup, Carrington, Moats, Batten isn’t an attempt to, as you put it, build a defense first?
why can’t they be more flexible and start off that way? because it’s not what most teams do? wouldn’t them doing that be ahead of the proverbial curve?
I know why the Bills want to run a hybrid and it’s specifically what you said – but I also think that plays into their hands more than you think. I think it gives them flexibility on the field and on draft day too and they are going to use that advantage. There’s no reason not too.
I see the gains of using a hybrid scheme and when some of the best defensive minds in football are doing it then it’s a model or curve that I want to be on. Buddy will still draft for a 3-4 but I bet if he had a player that was rated significantly higher than other players but was more of a 4-3 prospect that he’d take him in order to get better players on the field.
If approval was simply formulaic from wins and losses, there wouldn’t be a point to the poll and there wouldn’t be a very interesting conversation. - greysquirrel
by J2 on Mar 1, 2011 4:37 PM EST up reply actions
Agree across the board
Good point about the Merriman money being used on younger players. In two years, which of those players is going to be more important to the Bills and their future. I doubt Merriman will be in the fold, while Johnson and Bell should be quality starters, or close to it. You can add the Kelsay contract to this.
I really don’t understand the supposed interest in Atogwe and Sanders. We don’t ned pricey, older players. We need hungry, younger players. Is a cheap George Wilson that much worse than an expensive free agent from elsewhere. I’d say no.
I totally agree about the direction of this team, or lack there of. What’s the plan? Potentially trying to get to the playoffs (off to a horrible start) ASAP or actually building a quality team for a longer run? Hope whatever he’s doing actually works out because it sure seems questionable at this point.
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Mar 1, 2011 2:17 PM EST via mobile up reply actions 1 recs
actually building a quality team for a longer run?
I think this – the fact that they took more linemen and linebackers than anything shows that they are committed to the core of the team and long term success.
I get why you and others blast the Merriman pickup but it’s a boom or bust league. the bills aren’t any where near the cap are they? why can’t they gamble on a guy that could pay huge dividends for htem?
In order to be successful you have to take risks – every business does this and every team does this. to me its a non issue – they’ll pay the guys that they want to keep as long as Ralph doesn’t interfere and have his own cap.
If approval was simply formulaic from wins and losses, there wouldn’t be a point to the poll and there wouldn’t be a very interesting conversation. - greysquirrel
by J2 on Mar 1, 2011 2:52 PM EST up reply actions
Some businesses/teams are in better position to take risks..........
I dont think the Buffalo Bills are one of them.
The score dictated they pass
by norcaliangelsfan on Mar 1, 2011 3:02 PM EST up reply actions
why not?
If approval was simply formulaic from wins and losses, there wouldn’t be a point to the poll and there wouldn’t be a very interesting conversation. - greysquirrel
by J2 on Mar 1, 2011 3:05 PM EST up reply actions
Actually..........
on 2nd thought………….what the hell………..might as well go all in, nothing else to lose. Things couldnt get any worse actually.
Disregard my previous comment.
The score dictated they pass
by norcaliangelsfan on Mar 1, 2011 3:11 PM EST up reply actions
that’s where i’m at.
If there is a player that could seriously improve your team then why not snatch him up and give him a go? it’s better than letting a team like NE, MIA or the Jets sign him and try him out there – then if he panned out there people would be bashing Nix because he had a connection to Merriman and didn’t “pull the trigger when he had the chance” – I can read the comments now….
it’s not like this team is stocked full of must keep players that are going to jeopardize our salary cap in the future – i’d pay for a player or 2 if there was a high reward scenario involved and in this case there is.
If approval was simply formulaic from wins and losses, there wouldn’t be a point to the poll and there wouldn’t be a very interesting conversation. - greysquirrel
by J2 on Mar 1, 2011 3:16 PM EST up reply actions
I wasn't against the Merriman pickup
I think it was a risk worth taking. The problem is the contract, guaranteed money that will impact other signings or re-signings, and what appears to be blind faith that he’ll stay healthy. Its pretty ridiculous how much weight they are placing on Merriman’s crumbling shoulders…
If it was less money and they didn’t appear to feel “set” at OLB, it wouldn’t be as big an issue….
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Mar 1, 2011 3:48 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
I don’t think the bills signing Merriman hampers them as much as you’d like us to beleive.
first – the way they structure those contracts they can make almost anything work.
second – since the bills said they aren’t going to be major players in FA then they’re less likely to have to pay a hefty price to some FA in order to get him to come here.
third – we don’t even know what the salary cap is going to look like so what’s the difference? there are so many scenarios that can play out over the CBA that it’s difficult to know what’s going to happen. However I would assume that the salary cap would increase over 2009 and possibly significantly (but who knows?) but at the same time they have him signed and under contract so they know he’s not going anywhere.
If approval was simply formulaic from wins and losses, there wouldn’t be a point to the poll and there wouldn’t be a very interesting conversation. - greysquirrel
by J2 on Mar 1, 2011 4:42 PM EST up reply actions
Stated Perfectly
Exactly the reasons I went from approve to disapprove and stayed there..I can’t disapprove of the way Chan leads when this is what He gets to work with..
Brian
I have read numerous post of Buddy Nix being real fond of C. Newton. Tell me please, has anyone actually heard Buddy Nix say that he was really fond of C. Newton??
I’ve heard him talk about Newton pretty objectively, but the crux of all of the things you’ve heard was a Vic Carucci report.
Editor-in-Chief, BUFFALO RUMBLINGS®
@BrianGalliford
by Brian Galliford on Mar 1, 2011 2:03 PM EST up reply actions
Vic Carucci Report well it must be true then. Did Adam Sheftler confirm it. lol
by hitekguru on Mar 1, 2011 2:39 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Again, I will state this: the whole “I’m gonna rag on Reporter X” culture is incredibly annoying. No one has ever mandated that these reports be believed, no matter the perceived credibility of the reporter. A report is a report, and especially in a case like this – two months removed from the draft – it doesn’t mean crap. That’s regardless of whether you like Carucci or not. So can we please, please, please just focus on the football? :)
Editor-in-Chief, BUFFALO RUMBLINGS®
@BrianGalliford
by Brian Galliford on Mar 1, 2011 2:50 PM EST up reply actions
Approve
IMO Nix has had very little oppurtunity to make the drastic improvement that some fans will have to see before they can vote approve. Thats fine!! He has signed players at several positions when he believes they will improve the team. The complaint I here most is that those are scrub cast-offs from other teams. This is a true statement. That is where most of our non draft signings have come from. It does not mean they cant be starters or good depth on our team, just bc their old team could not find room for them on their roster. Teams put good talent on their PS all the time, and a team like the Bills that is rebuilding can spend more time with a player then a team with a higher talent level that has to meet the same roster requirements.
I personlly think Nix does not get enough credit for all the trades, and FA signings he has not made that in hindsight were very wise decisions. Remember all the QB’s that were reportedly linked to us last year. Mcnabb was the biggest of those and now looking back Nix was a genious for not taking him. I dont know if he ever made an attempt for him or not as was reported, but I am glad he is not on our team.
There have been some moves that I disagree with, but overall I think he has done well with the opptions that he has had
Please base your arguments in provable facts instead of pulling stuff out of your rear. -CanadianBillsFan- This is why talk is cheap because the supply always exceeds the demand.
Approve
On the back of the Stroud release mainly. Plus his positioning on the state of the roster.
Right or wrong, but I vote for these monthly polls based on what the person in question has done since the last poll.
Disapprove of course
My favorite comment is that Nix thinks the Bills are set at DT/NT. Uh huh. Maybe he’ll change his mind now that Tommie Harris and Kris Jenkins are available. They are definitely Nix’s type of player.
Do you have some sort of issue with Kyle Williams? Not a believer in the development of 22-year-old Torell Troup? No offense, but “uh huh” doesn’t really do it for me as an explanation. :)
Editor-in-Chief, BUFFALO RUMBLINGS®
@BrianGalliford
by Brian Galliford on Mar 1, 2011 2:51 PM EST up reply actions
Teams were highly successful running up the middle where Williams wasn’t. Troup was a flop last year. That’s not to say that Troup isn’t going to improve, I know it takes several years to learn the position. But potential isn’t going to cut it next year. And what happens if Williams gets injured?
I’ll refer again to ten years ago. The Bills had Ted Washington, Sam Adams and Pat Williams clogging up the middle. The Bills defense was near the top of the NFL then. No coincidence, defense starts where the ball is snapped.
Also see the Dolphins franchised Soliai. They know where their bread is buttered.
That Franchise Tag price was RE DONK U LUS though.
15 mil?!?!?!?
The score dictated they pass
by norcaliangelsfan on Mar 1, 2011 3:12 PM EST up reply actions
haha – good thing their QB is a lame duck
If approval was simply formulaic from wins and losses, there wouldn’t be a point to the poll and there wouldn’t be a very interesting conversation. - greysquirrel
by J2 on Mar 1, 2011 3:17 PM EST up reply actions
Bring on more fat boys!!!!!!!!!!!! Luv them guys!
"Adversity is an opportunity for heroism." Marv Levy.
by SERGEANT MAJOR THOR on Mar 1, 2011 8:15 PM EST up reply actions
I approve.
I think turning this team around is going to take a couple of years. If you haven’t noticed high end Free Agents aren’t jumping at the chance to move to sunny Buffalo and certainly aren’t overly excited at going to a team with a 10 year playoff drought. As far as his draft class goes I think it showed some promise. I still have high hopes for CJ Spiller. I think Moats, Carrington, and Troupe showed some promise. If I remember right Kyle Williams didn’t exactly tear it up his rookie year. If we’d all have had our way we would have taken Jimmy Clausen in the first round last year. Then we would be even further down the wrong road. In Mocking the Draft’s team by team draft last year right before the draft I think Brian took a linebacker in the second round that didn’t go until the sixth round in real life (I have all the respect for Good Ole’ Galliford by the way). It just goes to show you that we all know less than we think. I am going to be patient and optimistic until Buddy Nix proves he is as bad at managing a football team as he is at sounding intelligent.
I want to have Buddy Nix's baby.
Voted Not Sure
If the 2011 season comes and goes without an upgrade at OLB (either through Merriman, free agent, or draft picks) and OT (either through Bell developing, draft or free agent) I will start to slide towards disapprove as it will have been two years where Buddy has failed to address the two biggest issues that have haunted this team since before he got here – a pass rush and pass protection.
Im still wait and see on the last draft class, I so far like the decision to hire Gailey and nab Whaley. and I like the taking of risks with a young team, we need to roll some dice to get out of the rut the last decade put us in.
Either way, I told myself from the beginning I’d give Nix 3 years to field a winner and thats exactly what Im going to do. But I also told myself judgment day begins after the second off-season, thats when I’ll allow myself to start judging what hes done…its almost here.
Until then, I can’t possibly judge the man on one season of putting some makeup on one ugly franchise he inherited.
i’m sure i’m going to regret this conversation… but what the hell - J2
by poz on Mar 1, 2011 3:29 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
Disapprove
This guy isn’t sping-doctoring me into beleiving he has a “plan”.
"...You play to win the game. Hello? You play to win the game. You don't play it to just play it. That's the great thing about sports: you play to win, and I don't care if you don't have any wins. You go play to win. When you start tellin' me it doesn't matter, then retire. Get out! 'Cause it matters." ~ Herm Edwards
"Talk's cheap. We all know that. It's like I've always said: 'Don't tell me about the labor pains, just show me the baby.' " ~ Buddy Nix
by Jason from OH-IO on Mar 1, 2011 8:46 PM EST reply actions
Approve
Mainly on not drafting Jimmy Clausen last year. Quite a call to make. And it paid off.
The results of not doing so were not just seen in the obvious (skat back/NT to groom), but more so in the ‘not so obvious’. The emergence of Fitzy and Stevie J could have been jeopardized severely if not all together by drafting Jimmy Clausen last year. And if that happened, we’d have a much different view of what is needed in this years draft, setting us further behind than we are today. So for that single decision, to go against the ‘experts’, and many fellow rumblers consensus QB pick in the 2010 draft, I approve of Nix.
Other things I like are the Gailey hire, commitment to drafting a 3-4 and the use of the 4-3 since Kyle Williams is our D’s best player.
I approved
Mainly he is rebuilding. It is really hard to judge anyone after the first year of a rebuild. I gotta give himt ill at least the end of next season to give him a dissaprove. Its just to earlier in his gm carear. I think most people bring up he drafted spiller. Nix is also trying to guarentee the suceess of the franchise. We need playmakers spiller will become that. Chan did not use him properly because he had to know how everyone can perform not just spiller. I belive in the spiller pick. Freddy is what 30 and even though he does not have alot of wear and tear in the nfl. He has alot of wear in tear from the EFL and that arene league he played in. Before i can dissaprove him i gotta give his drafts time to develop. You can not fairly grade a draft until 3 years after it happened

by 






























