Baker's Dozen Bills Scheme Fit: Julio Jones
This post is part of a continuing series in which we break down 13 2011 NFL Draft prospects - our Baker's Dozen - that should interest the Buffalo Bills.
Buffalo runs a hybrid passing game incorporating all four NFL offensive philosophies. This hybrid offense calls for receivers to run both vertical and hortizontal timing routes, as well as sight adjustments. Buffalo uses three basic wide receiver positions: X-receiver, Z-receiver, and the slot receiver. Chan Gailey likes to cross-train his receivers so they can play all three spots, running all routes from the basic route tree.
Basic Route Tree

Base Offense

In Buffalo's base set, the X receiver lines up on the line of scrimmage, and the Z receiver one yard off the line of scrimmage. In Buffalo's scheme, the X is normally responsible for deep routes, running No. 4 through No. 9, and variations of each of those routes. Z normally runs the shorter, catch-and-run routes. When Gailey calls vertical timing plays, the X normally opens the field up with a No. 9 or deep No. 8 route to allow the Z to run a No. 6 or No. 8 in combination.
Base Offense- Slot Variation

This set has the X and Z on the same side, with the Z off the line of scrimmage. This set allows for combinations and route crossing, where the X again opens the field up for the Z.
Three WR Offense

The concept in Buffalo's three receiver set is the same in its four and five receiver sets. The X and Z act as dual X receivers, and the slot(s) runs Z routes.
Julio Jones at X Receiver

Jones is such a good athlete that he will be able to play any position. In Buffalo's offense, playing X is somewhat of a waste of his natural talents. Jones' game is similar to Terrell Owens': deep some, but a lot of catch-and-run and over-the-middle routes. I believe that Jones' best fit is as the Z receiver in a West Coast scheme. As the X in Buffalo, he wouldn't be much of an upgrade over Lee Evans in terms of stretching the defense.
Jones at Z Receiver

Z receiver is Jones' natural position. From the Z, Jones can unleash his strength as a runner, including a strong stiff arm. With Evans stretching the defense deep, Jones would be free to run underneath coverage, making tough catches in traffic, and punishing smaller defensive backs after the catch. His effect would be similar to Eric Moulds late in the 1990s: lots of short catches turned into long gains.
Jones at Z Slot

This position also allows Jones to effectively run underneath coverages, making short catches and running after the catch. The difference with Jones in the slot is that defenses couldn't run Cover 2 to bracket both Evans and Jones.
Jones in the Slot

The three receiver set with Jones in the slot is where he could be most effective. With the Z and X receivers attracting most of the attention and coverage of the safeties, Jones would be able to toy with underneath zones, running a mostly full route tree, and taking advantage of his natural advantage in size over defensive backs. The slot would also put Jones into an ideal position for reverses or any other gadget play Gailey would call.
Assessment
Jones is a schematic fit for Buffalo at X and Z, as well as the slot receiver. With most NFL teams using a combination hybrid of all four NFL offenses, there are very few teams that couldn't use Jones. In Buffalo, the issue would be numbers. Neither Jones nor Steve Johnson have the speed to play X, which is why Evans is still on the team, despite average production. Johnson is a silky smooth route runner, and is an ideal Z receiver. Roscoe Parrish began to emerge as an explosive slot receiver. Where does Jones fit in? If Buddy Nix is convinced that Jones is worth the third pick, then that likely means Parrish is out, though Buffalo would field one of the best receiving trios in the league.
That said, drafting a Z receiver, even one as promising as Jones, seems to be a luxury Buffalo cannot afford at this time.
14 comments
|
7 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I like Jones a lot – but as you said – he’s too much of a luxury.
I think Nelson and Jones will come on strong again and Nelson could overtake Parrish in that Z role just because of his size.
Plug in Roscoe and Easley with Johnson, Nelson and Evans and WR is probably one of our best positions. These guys are all young with upside save for Evans and Roscoe so let them develop and see how they become as players.
I think Jones would be an asset especially in the running game because of his aggressiveness in that area – but I think you said it right – he’s a luxury that the Bills cannot afford at this point.
When you innovate, you've got to be prepared for everyone telling you you're nuts.
Nice write up. I agree that it’s tough to imagine the Bills taking a guy at #3 who would either sit on the bench or push Stevie Johnson to the bench. Of course, it was tough to imagine the Bills taking a RB at #9 with Lynch and Jackson already on the team…
It can always get worse. Let me tell you how.
you said it
Of course, it was tough to imagine the Bills taking a RB at #9 with Lynch and Jackson already on the team…
much nicer than what I was thinking.
BTW, thanks DJ for taking (a lot of) time bringing us this excellent piece.
"Welcome back my friends to the show that never ends. We're so glad you could attend, come inside, come inside" - ELP
Well, if they took Jones you’d have to think they would be running 3 WRs a majority of the time. And maybe their offense would start to look similar the Saints – spread it out and throw it around.
My only 1 arguement is:
You can never have enough good receivers, Green Bay proved that.
Receivers help QB play, help keep plays alive and good blocking receivers can really improve a run game. The only thing good receivers don’t do is improve your defense so thats really the only arguement I have against taking a WR, but at the same time would not turn it down. Look I love some of our receivers just as much as any one on this site but do I think we have an elite group, NO we do not have a proven elite receiver on this roster and until Stevie does what he did last year again im not sold, game tape in the offseason can change a guys production big time and great corners like Darelle Revis, Champ Bailey and some of the others will no longer be defending Lee, they will switch to Stevie and Stevie will have more of a hard time running routes against guys like them instead of the second options.
I think Jones or Green not only would do our offense good but it would do Stevie a solid aswell.
"Big Gulps Eh, Well See ya later" - Lloyd Christmas
" You Gus ready To Let The Dogs Out" "What?" " you Know, Who Let the dogs out rough rough rogh rough" - Zack Galifinakis - The Hangover
by PaullyPforPrez on Mar 21, 2011 10:20 AM EDT reply actions
Jones would be fun to have
But with our depth at WR, and our glaring needs on defense I find him to be one of the more unlikely candidates in the lucky 13
Shun the non Billievers!
Thanks DJ I am really looking forward to your input on all of these guys.
I agree completly. I like Jones’ play style so much but he just is not what we need at his time. At least Green can be argued as an upgrade at the X position, but we seem pretty set at the Z. Would any of our other WR’s besides Easly have the speed to start at the X WR spot if Evans were to get hurt, or is S. Johnson our best fill in?
Please base your arguments in provable facts instead of pulling stuff out of your rear. -CanadianBillsFan- This is why talk is cheap because the supply always exceeds the demand.
I think Easley is the team's future X receiver
Though he’s got the skill set to play Z.
More on Green at the X receiver later in the series, but you’re right on target.
I like a Buffalo combo of Johnson-Easley-Parrish moving forward about five years. I’d like a combo of Easley-Johnson-fast X receiver better.
Starting the official Buffalo "Draft Owen Marecic in 2011" campaign.
Wow! I forgot all about Easley! He was having a great camp until his injury. Of course, lots of players have great camps and then just suck against live competition.
It can always get worse. Let me tell you how.
Your honor,
I submit exhibit one, Trent Edwards, to the court.
Starting the official Buffalo "Draft Owen Marecic in 2011" campaign.
Your honor we now rest our case . lol
by matthew62 on Mar 21, 2011 10:06 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
I thought about mentioning Edwards but wasn’t he really just the best of the Bills’ QB options in camp as opposed to being great in camp?
It can always get worse. Let me tell you how.
by Ron From NM on Mar 21, 2011 11:27 PM EDT up reply actions
If Easley can have a good year this year
It would make Evans dispendable in his last year (perfect trade bait) hope hope hope!!!
Please base your arguments in provable facts instead of pulling stuff out of your rear. -CanadianBillsFan- This is why talk is cheap because the supply always exceeds the demand.


































