Using BPA - Keysh's 4 round mock (v1)
I've held back long enough. With this crazy off season it's been difficult, i really look forward to Free Agency every year and this year I feel robbed! I am hopeful that this thing gets resolved by June.
AnywaysIn any case, I am nbow ready to publish my projected mock draft for our beloved Bills. I used the BPA approach for the two first rounds and then it got a little murky. Besides I'm not convinced that BPA means much on day 2 of the draft. If you are going to draft a depth or project players, might as well be someone you believe can work in your system and that can help fill a need.
Here we go!
Round 1 (1.3)
a) Patrick Peterson: Clearly he's the best player available and also the safest pick on the board. It just so happens that he'd also greatly improve our team as well. With McGees string of injuries, we definitely need to start thinking of the future. Notice to all #1 receivers - You might be stuck on Peterson Island when you come to buffalo and it's a lonely place to be baby!!
b) Von Miller: He is by far the top Linebacker in the draft and one of the best to come out in the past decade. He's a serious mature senior with no character issues. He clearly fits arguably our biggest need, a pro-bowl rush linebacker. He proved in his senior bowl that he also possesses what looks to be very solid coverage skills as well. Nix has repeatedly said that they will pile talent on talent so I would not be surprised that they'd take him if Peterson is off the board. He would be a great addition to our team at #3.
c) Marcel Dareus: This guy is the most versatile defensive player in this years draft. He is an extremely athletic DT and at 6'3" and 320lbs there are a ton of things that Chan could do with this guy. He'd improve our front instantly! His presence would open up Kyle Williams to be able to reak even more havoc. Dareus can play all three positions DT/DE/NT so his value is huge for a Hybrid type Defense like ours and long term when we settle into our 3-4 he could be a permanent fixture at DE. The fact that this kid has a great work ethic, is grounded and has great character are all contributing factors in my reasoning for having him in our top 3 possibilities for #3.
There's no use discussing other candidates as I firmly believe that one of these three will be a Buffalo Bill come April 28th.
Round 2 (2.2)
a) Kyle Rudolph: There is no question that Rudolph is the best TE in this years draft. Many experts are comparing him to Gronkowski and/or Pettigrew. He's a blocking TE with great ball skills. He'd be an instant upgrade over any of our existing TEs. He's clearly at the top of the TE pecking order in this years draft. Had it not been for his injury last year he'd be going in the first round around the same spot as Pettigrew did. Having a REAL every down TE is a huge need on our team and it would do wonders in pass protection as well as both the passing & running games.
b) Christian Ponder: I hesitated here a bit but I think both Gailey and Nix really like this kid. He's not as sexy a prospect as others but he clearly has abilities to become a very good signal caller at the next level. So if Rudolph is off the board, I think Nix pulls the trigger on Ponder to become our franchise guy over the next 3 years.
c) Derek Sherrod: I seriously doubt that Sherrod makes it to us at #34 but then again, if both Rudolph & Pounder are off the board already, then there could be a chance. He's a perfect fit for the RT that we are so desperately looking for. He's got the size and athleticism to probably play LT but I think with a little work his run blocking can be improved.
Round 3 (3.4)
a) Mason Foster: I absolutely love this guy, he's a big athletic guy that tackles like a machine. As a rush type OLB he lacks the elite speed but his instincts are incredible and he's a monster tackler. I believe that he would be way better off sliding into the ILB spot next to POZ. I watched a lot of his games and he really impressed me.
b) Quan Sturdivant: The good news here is that I believe that Foster will be there for us at the top of the third round. But if he isn't then I really think we need to take the top ILB. I somehow doubt that Sturdivant will be there for us but if he is and Foster is gone then we need to pull the trigger. Getting bigger & stronger at ILB is a must this year.
c) Marcus Cannon: Here's another guy that will probably be off the board by this point but if he's there and both options at ILB are gone then we need to jump on him. He's the massive RT teams dream about. He's almost an identical replica of Minnesota's Loadholt. I can just hear the color analyst now... The Cannon just blew the hole that Spiller took to the house!
d) Sam Acho: I doubt we get to him but if all three are gone, then I'd go with a definite position of need. Acho proved to our coaching staff that he has the ability to contribute.
Round 4 (4.3)
a) Robert Sands: This guy has the size and instincts to be a great SS at the next level. He is 6'4" 217lbs with great instincts. Here's what ESPN's Insider has to say about him: " Makes a quick diagnosis and fills downhill with conviction. A strong and reliable tackler. Not afraid to deliver big hit and can deliver violent strike. Displays good timing and execution when going down low and chopping out legs of ball carriers. Length gives him a wide range as a tackler. However, can do a better job of breaking down when caught in one-on-one situations in the open field."
b) Chris Hairston: Another very good candidate for RT with the size required by our coaching staff.
c) Jarvis Jenkins: A good solid prospect for 3-4 DE
Conclusion:
Patrick Peterson (CB), 6'1" 219lbs**
Kyle Rudolph (TE), 6'6" 260lbs**
Mason Foster (ILB), 6'1" 245lbs
Robert Sands (SS), 6'4 217lbs
With our two first picks we wind up with the top player at their respective positions. All 4 guys are known for being big, strong and physical for their positions. We didn't reach in any of those picks and all 4 would really improve our team and have the chance to be starters in their rookie year.
I know some will criticize this mock because I didn't take a QB but I can't see a scenario where a QB would be available to us without having to reach for him. I know Joe would argue that Keap is worth our #34 but I disagree. He's too much of a project to waste our #34 on him. Rudolph is a blue chip stock, he's the top TE in this years draft and it fills a position of definite need. If we take a completely objective look at our team 3-4 years down the road, taking a guy like Rudolph makes more sense. He could be the next Gonzales. Next year's crop of QBs will be even better than this years. If you think we are 2-3 years from being rebuilt then I understand the desire for a QB in this years draft. If like me you believe that we are a bit further away like 3-5 years, then you'll probably agree with my approach.
Just another great fan opinion shared on the pages of BuffaloRumblings.com.
27 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Yes it would improve our team.
If we are going to pass on DE and LB in the first two rounds, then A.J. Green and Colin Kaepernick would improve our team as well. so wouldn’t robert Quinn or Von Miller in the first with Martez Wilson in the second would improve our team. Alot of scenerio’s would help improve the team. Yours is right up there, I just don’t see us going TE or Tackle early in the draft with all the additions to those positions in the later part of last year.
YOU ARE OUT of you kuku fufu mine craker laker Flaber baber FUNKI chunki brain. WE want to winn every year -- abayarde
My point was that Rudolph is the top TE in the draft, no question about it. Whereas Keap is 4-5th in the QB class. He’s way more of a question mark than Rudolph. With Rudolph, your are 95% sure to be set at the TE position for the next 6-10 years.
I started this post by saying that I was going to take the BPA approach. I am not deliberately passing on LB or DE in the first round, they are just not the top BPA at #3 IMO, Peterson is. If Peterson is off the board, then I think we should be looking at Von Miller. You’re comments make me believe that you are thinking Need vs BPA and I solely was looking at BPA in the two first rounds. BPA for me starts with the player being the unquestioned top guy at his position, which is true for Peterson, Miller & Rudolph. Is the 5th beast QB better than the top rated TE? Especially a TE that would have certainly went in the first round had he not just been coming off a major surgery? From all indications, Rudolph has recovered fully so he is a steal at the top of Rd2.
I agree with not going with a Tackle in Rd2 just because we’d be looking at the 4-5th best guy at that position. If Rudolph is off the boards and there’s a good chance that he might be, then I really believe that Chan will convince Buddy to pull the trigger for Pounder, who could be a very productive QB in this league under the tutelage of Chan Gailey.
Rebuilding a team properly takes time and patience
My point was that Rudolph is the top TE in the draft, no question about it. Whereas Keap is 4-5th in the QB class.
I agree with not going with a Tackle in Rd2 just because we’d be looking at the 4-5th best guy at that position.
I have never bought into the “let’s pick the best player at postion A b/c the alternative is picking the 4th/5th best player at position B” argument.
I mean isn’t the real question this – Do Chix believe that Kaep is franchise QB material? If we’re not talking about what they would do (based on the title of your post), still a possible franchise QB is way more important than having your TE position set for the next 6-10 yrs. Wouldn’t you agree?
Asides all of that, to answer your question – Yes this draft would certainly improve our team. That’s likely 3 starters, maybe even 4 depending on how Sands shows up.
still a possible franchise QB is way more important than having your TE position set for the next 6-10 yrs. Wouldn’t you agree?
YES, I definitely agree
I have never bought into the "let’s pick the best player at postion A b/c the alternative is picking the 4th/5th best player at position B" argument.
I most definitely disagree
Maybe the 2/3rd argument but once you get down to 4-5th you are talking project prospects with high hopes on intangibles and there’s no way that I’d pass-up a chance at a guy that could be an impact player like Gonzalez, Davis, Clark or Witten. The odds of Keap being a franchise QB are long. The way I look at it, there are at least 8 teams that NEED a QB (Car, Buf, Was, Min, SF, Ari, Mia, Ten) and possibly even 2 more that could definitely be interested (Den, Oak). So that’s 9 organizations that pass on a guy that has potential “franchise” qualities. I don’t think that the “potential” is that high, if he is the 5th rated one from the litter but that’s just me. I prefer the safer pick, taking the hands down best TE in the draft that could be an impact player for us for the next 7-10 years. There are plenty of QBs in next years draft that we could pick with our first round selection that will probably (logically) have a better chance at eventually becoming the “franchise guy” that we are so desperately looking for. Let’s not let our NEED cloud our judgment.
Rebuilding a team properly takes time and patience
…O.o
Keysh I normally really like your posts but this baffles me. Are you telling me the top TE in this draft is better than the 4th rated D-Lineman? I’m not so certain. The problem I have with the analogy of “pick the best at a position!” is that you don’t really think beyond that position.
It is possible that the best rated TE isn’t as good as the fifth rated LB. But you’re advocating taking the top rated TE anyways? What about the top rated FB? Why wasn’t he drafted? By round three you’re picking third or fourth rated guys at specific positions, by this logic isn’t the best rated FB the choice?
I’ll take a Christian Pounder with cheese and a medium fry.
Seriously, I like these choices. I am OK with holding off on QB for one more year if we go defense heavy and early this year.
I like to believe this has more to do with the Bills players feeling like they can be something special. They started a year 0-8 and finished 4-4 while taking playoff and championship game bound teams to OT and 3 pt nail biters. All this with one year under a new coach and with a young roster. Im sure they can feel what they are capable of. -poz
I love it...
As long as we take Ponder and not Pounder…
by Blobillsfootball on Apr 3, 2011 6:44 PM EDT reply actions
Great post Keysh. Thanks.
But I don’t think Kyle Rudolph will be there. Somebody is going to pull the trigger on him at the end of the 1st. Steelers? Falcons? Saints? Ravens?
"There is not a loser in this room." Marv Levy.
by SERGEANT MAJOR THOR on Apr 3, 2011 8:36 PM EDT reply actions
wow, steelers wont , but gosh damn it i was had hope that we might get rudolph but Falcons, Saints, and Ravens? If he falls past trhem it would be a miracle and i hope buffalo fixes are tight end problem..every team that made it far in the playoffs had good tightends!
C.j spiller over Tim tebow? Newton is the best pick at #3.
I'm disapointed...
I would have liked someone to talk about Mason Foster. I watched a lot of Washington games because I wanted to see Locker, figuring he’d be a serious prospect for us. I ended up being more impressed with a linebacker, go figure!
I am a bit disappointed that nobody has commented on him as my fourth round pick or the fact that I see him more as a ILB than OLB. This guy is a definite thumper! Am I crazy to think he’d be a very good ILB?
Rebuilding a team properly takes time and patience
not crazy to think that. fosters a pretty good LB prospect in general and the top of the 3rd is about the right spot for him i think. i dont think hes a guy that can play downhill and plug holes by challenging blockers at the next level tho. see him more as a depth/rotational guy on the outside personally
Love the Sands pick.
I love his size and run support ability. We need a tall guy in the secondary we can line in man coverage and be effective against TEs.
I also like Foster too, found him much like you watching Locker made a ton of tackles.
I would flip your first rounders.
I think Dareus is safest. Then Von Miller, then Peterson.
Peterson just feels so much to me like Pac Man Jones.
Jones even had a higher wonderlich than Peterson, which scares me even more.
Every argument about what a safe prospect Patrick Peterson is, are the same arguments I heard what a safe pick Pac Man Jones was, and we know how Pac Man worked out. Peterson is even less intelligent. He shows Pac Man signs with boasts of how he would like to be #1 pick….ugh. Stupid people and big money in their pocket can be a toxic mix as Pac Man showed, or even Dez Bryant. Dez is showing he has no talent at money managing as of late.
I would go with Dareus at 3, I think he is the safest pick there, he may not be the smartest, but he knows to keep his mouth shut, his head down and just go play, and show what you can do on the field.
Girls use hair spray, Men don't.
DO YOURSELF A FAVOR AND GROW UP BY NOT USING HAIRSPRAY MALES!
Don't be a Paully!
Wow
you’re the first to bring up the Pacman comparison – SCARY !!
You sure? I remember when Pacman was drafted but vaguely, it’s been a few years but didn’t he already have a few character flags? I thought Patrick Peterson is squeaky clean?? I certainly would not equate wonderlic scores with (a) being Stupid and (b) automatically assuming that they will freak out with money in their hands.
Rebuilding a team properly takes time and patience
what makes you say peterson is less intelligent than Pac Man? his wonderlic score? theres a big difference between knowledge and intelligence. the wonderlic is a test of simple (and somewhat random at times) knowledge, but certainly not a measurement in any tangible way of a persons intelligence. and the fact that u seem to draw the conclusion that peterson couldnt handle money, id like to know how the hell u arrived there (if its just his wonderlic then well, cmon man)
and of course he said he would like to be the #1 pick, who wouldnt?
Explain Please
What are Peterson and Rudolph going to do for a run defense. With Peterson the opposition will average close to 300yds rushing a game. And Rudolph will probably never get on the field We have to build up our front seven and OL. The Bills brass have repeatedly stated that they need to stop the run and build up the front seven. How does your Mock do that????
Having Peterson taking the right side of the field our safety could play on the box more to help stop the run… Obviously a TE isn’t going to help us stop the run but we have other needs on the team. Mason Foster would help sgainst the run so it wouldn’t be the best draft for runstoppers it would give us a few advantages.
they may not do anything whatsoever for our run defense. that in no way shape or form means they wont make the bills a better football team. peterson and rudolph (if he can stay healthy…) are two very significant talent boosts to two parts of our roster which have very little of it
I voted yes but TE and SS are not that high a priority
We need an OLB that can rush and another 3-4 DE more than those 2 spots.
I like Shiloh Keo later in draft at S
And Rob Hausler at TE in back half of RD 4.
I woul use the 2nd for an OLB and top pick in 4th on an RT

by 





























