Not as thoroughly researched (or sober) as day 2.  Yesterday A. Williams was #2 on the board, and taken ahead of Bowers.  They went off track on the third round with K. Sheppard as Nawrocki had him as #101 and Mayock did not rate in his top 100.  This is the Bills I'm familiar with.  Not saying it was a reach or stupid etc., but my experts think there were better players to be had.  If they get the guys below, the value would negate the Sheppard pick and raise their grade.  As evidence of their expertise almost all of their top 100 is gone 

Shout out to billsoferie yesterday who had picks 2 & 3.  Hope he's wrong on 4th as Sands is not rated.

C. Ballard  DE  #60.0:  how many snaps will he get

C. Boling  G/T  #62.5:  this is a need

E. Gates  WR  #68.0:  could  make Evans/Parrish expendable

L. Stocker  TE  #76.5  this is a need

S. Acho  OLB  #80.5  this is a need

Close:  C. McCarthy LB #84;  J. Brewer  T #90:  L. Ziemba T #90.5

Liked by at least one:  J. Thomas CB; V. Green TE; C. Carter OLB

  I was disappointed in the comments yesterday as almost everyone just restated who they liked and did not critique the experts ratings or the need/scheme fits.  I would take Stocker, but once again I would not criticize any of these choices.  I'm hoping they take the solid guy, and stick their neck out on the second 4th rounder.  I just don't want a R. Corner type pick (where the experts need to check their notes).