Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Safety Ryan Clark's Motivational Workout

Bills 2010 Film Review: Week 7 At Baltimore (Offense)

Stevie Johnson and the Bills torched Ravens CB Fabian Washington (31) in Week 7.

As we discussed yesterday, we're going to start reviewing chunks of TV footage from the Buffalo Bills during the 2010 season. I started that process last night by looking at the team's offensive performance in a 34-31 overtime loss to the Baltimore Ravens in Week 7 - a loss that dropped the Bills to 0-6 on the season. I've got five thoughts to share; if there's something you're curious about that I don't cover here, ask away in the comments section.

Point 1: Buffalo's wide receivers torched Baltimore's cornerbacks. If you're wondering why the Bills were so efficient in this particular game, against one of the league's best defenses, the biggest of a myriad of reasons is that the Ravens were beyond brutal at cornerback. Every Ravens cornerback struggled, but Fabian Washington in particular was brutal, as he was beaten deep early for a score by Lee Evans and repeatedly torched on slant routes by both Evans and, in particular, Stevie Johnson. Buffalo got their running game established early - five of their first six plays were runs - and that helped them get balance and rhythm, as well. Johnson beat Washington on the same exact slant play off of play-action twice, gaining 78 yards on those plays.

Star-divide

Point 2: Ryan Fitzpatrick was Ryan Fitzpatrick. I'm going to poke a hole in the idea that this performance from Fitzpatrick was an aberration. In re-watching this game, I saw a Fitzpatrick that was decidedly excellent, but still prone to all of the shortcomings that we talk about frequently, and show up more often in other games. He overlooked open receivers in favor of forcing balls into coverage, made slightly inaccurate throws that his receivers brought down, was imprecise mechanically, and made poor decisions at costly times. (Like trying to squeeze a ball through Ray Lewis and Ed Reed to Roscoe Parrish on the first play of the second half. That was a bad idea, Ryan.) He also made some outstanding throws - a 24-yard pass to Evans in overtime really stood out - and did a fantastic job of finding favorable matchups and exploiting Baltimore's terrible cornerback play. Statistically, he was excellent, but there's more to football than stats.

Point 3: Formation, formation, formation. Buffalo earned a reputation last season as a team that liked to spread opponents out with three- and four-receiver sets and shotgun formations, but that's not how they played in their 24-point first-half performance. Fitzpatrick was in the gun for just eight of 34 plays in the half, and they had two receivers on the field for 18 of them. After the game got away from them a little bit, the shotgun and spread returned, as Fitzpatrick was in the gun for 29 of 45 plays in the second half.

Out of the gun, Fitzpatrick completed 20 of 31 passes for 199 yards, two touchdowns and two interceptions. From under center, however, Fitzpatrick was much more efficient, if not incredible, going 9-of-13 for 199 yards and two scores. (Data for a Fred Jackson screen pass - one that eerily resembled his long touchdown against Pittsburgh - is counted there, even though the play was brought back due to an illegal formation penalty on Buffalo.) Buffalo was productive when they weren't forced into the shotgun, as Fitzpatrick was 6-of-7 for 73 yards and a score out of the gun in the first half. Based solely on this one game, it's fair to postulate that the less the Bills use the gun next season, the better. But balance is a must.

Point 4: Shawn Nelson was a big part of Chan Gailey's game plan. Nelson had just come off of a four-game suspension and a groin injury, and was appearing in his first game of the season. He saw a lot of playing time, getting in on 25 of the team's 79 reps offensively - more than twice the amount of reps given to C.J. Spiller. He was used predominantly in a three-receiver, one-tight end, one-back personnel package that lined up in a variety of different formations. Nelson spent most of his time in-line, but was split out wide a few times, and was the target on a fade route in a red zone drive that ended in a field goal. People will remember Nelson's costly overtime fumble in this game, but he was solid prior to that play. If Nelson is healthy next season, it wouldn't shock me if Gailey threw him back into this package right away.

Point 5: We need more play-action, Chan. I'd take a hit in the eyes of Ron From NM if I didn't point out that this was the game in which Gailey unveiled a pass protection scheme that involved left guard Andy Levitre pulling to the right side of the formation, as if he were run-blocking - even on calls that didn't involve a play-fake. Baltimore cottoned onto it eventually, but early on it did a fantastic job of freezing Baltimore's linebackers and opening up throwing lanes down the field. Eric Wood was used as an effective puller early in the game on run plays, as well, which helped set up the play-action game. Fitzpatrick was gold on traditional play-action plays in this game, completing five of six passes for a whopping 130 yards. Play fakes were used on the slants that torched Washington, as well. Buffalo also had a bubble screen set up for Parrish on a play fake, but Washington beat blocker Evans to Parrish on the only play Washington made all day.

Again, these are just the big points I came away with. I can answer questions to the best of my ability in the comments section.

Comment 78 comments  |  5 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

How are you able to re watch the games?

Did you record them on gameday and hang on to the tape or are you subscribing to something. There was enough interesting things that happened last year I wouldn’t mind taking a second look

by blitzboy54 on May 19, 2011 11:56 AM EDT reply actions  

I bought a $20 subscription to NFL Game Rewind.

Editor-in-Chief, BUFFALO RUMBLINGS®
@BrianGalliford

by Brian Galliford on May 19, 2011 11:57 AM EDT up reply actions  

does that work like a netflix type thing, or do you watch it right on the pc/laptop?

"Opportunity is missed by most people because it comes dressed in overalls and looks like work." Thomas Edison

by HurricaneJay on May 19, 2011 12:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

You can only watch it on a computer.

Editor-in-Chief, BUFFALO RUMBLINGS®
@BrianGalliford

by Brian Galliford on May 19, 2011 12:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

You can only watch it on a computer.

sad face Brian – just stream that crap to the TV!

I know that you paid attention to his footwork because of our previous conversations – thoughts on that?

When you innovate, you've got to be prepared for everyone telling you you're nuts.

by J2 on May 19, 2011 12:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

Imprecise. Fitzpatrick doesn’t have a strong arm, so to create velocity, he’s either perfect with his mechanics, or he’s winding up like Nolan Ryan and throwing with all arm. That’s borne of his gunslinger tendencies. If he’d play with a bit more precision, we’d complain less about his accuracy, because he can spot a football beautifully when he’s on.

Editor-in-Chief, BUFFALO RUMBLINGS®
@BrianGalliford

by Brian Galliford on May 19, 2011 12:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’ve thought that as well – Fitzpatrick really a lot of effort into a lot of his throws than a typical QB. It’s like he’s trying to throw the ball through a wall in a lot of cases.

by Pistol on May 19, 2011 1:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

The 99-yard TD to Owens comes to mind. It was like sandlot football.

In the year two thousaaaaaaand.
In the year two thousAAAAAAND!

by TheAfghanTwilight on May 19, 2011 2:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

The interception he sailed against the Patriots comes to mind.

by cjf4 on May 19, 2011 2:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

Im going to like these posts alot...

Our defense got manhandled in the middle of that game by all of baltimores offense (boldin, heap, mcgahee, rice), was there anything notable about the Bills play on defense? Rephrased, did any players on defense stand out as either having great games or very poor ones?
And of course the million dollar question: did shawn nelson legitimately fumble that football or did the officials blow it

by boomsauce on May 19, 2011 12:14 PM EDT reply actions  

oh i see. im a fool, this was offense only :(. second question still stands

by boomsauce on May 19, 2011 12:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don’t think that Nelson’s progress was stopped either way, and he certainly wasn’t down when the ball was stripped. Geoff Hangartner was the bigger bonehead on that play, as he gave the Ravens 15 yards after the turnover with a stupid personal foul.

Editor-in-Chief, BUFFALO RUMBLINGS®
@BrianGalliford

by Brian Galliford on May 19, 2011 12:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

Heap was on fire. Well, any TE was on fire against the Bills. They faced some of the best ones last year.

In the year two thousaaaaaaand.
In the year two thousAAAAAAND!

by TheAfghanTwilight on May 19, 2011 2:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

Ryan Fitzpatrick was Ryan Fitzpatrick

The fact that he played so well and yet still so erratically leads me to believe that, with a more solid defense, we could have definitely won this game. I know that’s a fairly obvious thing to state given that we gave up 37 points, but I think there is a contingent of people that thought that Fitz just played a flawless game and that led to the offense running in high gear. I’m actually glad to hear that, although he played well, he was far from flawless. It gives me hope that we can really contend week in and week out with a more solid defense and an offensive game plan under our belt.

"Slowly all the roles we act out become our identity. And in the end we are what we pretend to be." - Jerry Cantrell.

by stetzwebs on May 19, 2011 12:14 PM EDT reply actions  

Fitzpatrick was part of the game’s undoing. After going up 24-10, this was the string of big plays:

  • Donte Whitner drops a pick-six
  • C.J. Spiller fumbles a kickoff return
  • Reggie Corner end-zone INT is overruled
  • Fitzpatrick forces the ball between 52 and 20, 52 tips it into 20’s hands
  • Fitzpatrick throws a second INT as he’s hit when 63 whiffs on a block

In that time frame, the score went from 24-10 Bills to 34-24 Ravens.

Editor-in-Chief, BUFFALO RUMBLINGS®
@BrianGalliford

by Brian Galliford on May 19, 2011 12:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

On the flip side, wouldn’t you say he was largely responsible for the team fighting back to a tie?

"Slowly all the roles we act out become our identity. And in the end we are what we pretend to be." - Jerry Cantrell.

by stetzwebs on May 19, 2011 12:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

He played quite well in the fourth quarter, yes. I don’t know as I’d so far as to say he was “largely responsible.” The Ravens helped out an awful lot.

Editor-in-Chief, BUFFALO RUMBLINGS®
@BrianGalliford

by Brian Galliford on May 19, 2011 12:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

So your saying Fitz was bad but the Ravens were worse.

He has a ways to go, we all know that, but he did play well in the foruth quarter, yes. Even franchise QB’s depend on the defense to faulter now and then.

YOU ARE OUT of you kuku fufu mine craker laker Flaber baber FUNKI chunki brain. WE want to winn every year -- abayarde

by VanScottM on May 19, 2011 11:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

No, that’s not what I’m saying. I’m saying he was excellent, but his flaws were still clear.

Editor-in-Chief, BUFFALO RUMBLINGS®
@BrianGalliford

by Brian Galliford on May 20, 2011 6:29 AM EDT up reply actions  

I’m not trying to bury the guy-despite my posts clamoring for a new QB-but….

It’s comments like this that have me hoping more people come to realize we may have already seen the best of Fitzpatrick and his strong suits will never win out against his shortcomings.

In the year two thousaaaaaaand.
In the year two thousAAAAAAND!

by TheAfghanTwilight on May 19, 2011 2:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Dude

You don’t need to convince me about Fitz.

A QB is like a King in chess, if you don't have one you lose! Get a QB Buffalo!
.

by buffalobacker on May 19, 2011 3:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well Peyton Manning is a free agent.

YOU ARE OUT of you kuku fufu mine craker laker Flaber baber FUNKI chunki brain. WE want to winn every year -- abayarde

by VanScottM on May 19, 2011 11:22 PM EDT up reply actions   2 recs

Brian, my question has to do with this game a little, but more for the season as a whole. In your first point you mentioned slants were working with Evan and Stevie. I was wondering what the efficiency of these patterns were throughout the year, as well as this game. It seems to me that this route is seldom used by the Bills but often effective. I could be wrong, so this is why I bring my question to you.

by BillsfanDan on May 19, 2011 12:16 PM EDT reply actions  

I have very little idea beyond this one game. I’ll get back to you.

Editor-in-Chief, BUFFALO RUMBLINGS®
@BrianGalliford

by Brian Galliford on May 19, 2011 12:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

Please look at Kelsay in this game

I watched him this game, and had the perception his team was competing despite his efforts…please put the spotlight on him during this review as this was a game i recorded but due to space on DVR i had to delete.

I liked Stevie J in this game a lot…

by Dingus Day on May 19, 2011 12:23 PM EDT reply actions  

I did not watch the defense in this game, hence “(Offense)” in the title. :)

Editor-in-Chief, BUFFALO RUMBLINGS®
@BrianGalliford

by Brian Galliford on May 19, 2011 12:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

Just another day at the office.....

Quality offenses take advantage of liabilities.

~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."

by Kurupt on May 19, 2011 1:27 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Real football analysis! Recommended reading!

I don’t know why Gailey insisted on running plays from the gun so much last year. There has got to be a reason…like it really helps protection for these guys or it helps Fitzy see the safeties and coverage….or whatever.

BUT it was frustrating to watch, knowing that an O has more options from a QB under center formation. The numbers from this game are as good of proof as you could find to back this theory.

It seems obvious to me that an O needs to line up under center on third down and any distance under 7 yards. Gailey obviously has his reasons, whic I may never understand.

Watching a Bills game in Toronto is like hosting a bachelor party in a hospital! -Keysh67

by Undee on May 19, 2011 12:29 PM EDT reply actions  

I’d venture a guess – and it’s just a guess – that the young O-Line had something to do with it. Makes life easier for Fitz to see the defense, set protections, and buys him a hair of additional time to see pressure coming.

Editor-in-Chief, BUFFALO RUMBLINGS®
@BrianGalliford

by Brian Galliford on May 19, 2011 12:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

Opening day vs. Miami....

3rd and short….we were ALWAYS in the shotgun or pistol formations. I was ready to rip my hair out seeing that. I hope Gailey has a better idea of the talent and capabilities of the team now. We should see formations and plays that match our offensive strengths more next year.

by BuffaloFanFromCT on May 19, 2011 12:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

For the record, the Bills were 3rd&5 or shorter eight times in Baltimore, and operated out of the shotgun on seven of those plays.

Editor-in-Chief, BUFFALO RUMBLINGS®
@BrianGalliford

by Brian Galliford on May 19, 2011 12:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

thank you for justifying my sleepless nights. I thought I was thinking up these things out of thin air.

GAILEY – GIVE THE BALL TO “FREDDY SMACKSON” (my nickname for Fred Jackson) WHEN YOU ARE IN THIRD AND SHORT!!!!!!!!!

by BuffaloFanFromCT on May 19, 2011 12:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

Also for the record, I thought Fred Jackson was superb in this game. Ran well, was outstanding in blitz pickup.

Editor-in-Chief, BUFFALO RUMBLINGS®
@BrianGalliford

by Brian Galliford on May 19, 2011 12:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

something better change

7 out of 8 plays

3rd and 5 OR SHORTER

out of the gun

……….not gonna fly much longer

Watching a Bills game in Toronto is like hosting a bachelor party in a hospital! -Keysh67

by Undee on May 19, 2011 12:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Don’t worry Undee – my doctor prescribed me pills to deal with this. Tell your doctor you have Bills syndrome and he’ll give you double doses of Xanax.

by BuffaloFanFromCT on May 19, 2011 12:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Tell your doctor you have Bills syndrome

I think they should refer us to a specialist.

Watching a Bills game in Toronto is like hosting a bachelor party in a hospital! -Keysh67

by Undee on May 19, 2011 1:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

The doctor prescribes a healthy dose of lockout for anyone suffering Bills syndrome. It seems to be working for most sufferers.

In the year two thousaaaaaaand.
In the year two thousAAAAAAND!

by TheAfghanTwilight on May 19, 2011 2:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

On one of three 3rd (or 4th)&1 or less, they were in shotgun.

Editor-in-Chief, BUFFALO RUMBLINGS®
@BrianGalliford

by Brian Galliford on May 19, 2011 12:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

Which I think is why they took White, for those situations.

"Opportunity is missed by most people because it comes dressed in overalls and looks like work." Thomas Edison

by HurricaneJay on May 19, 2011 12:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think they took White to get value out of that third RB spot, and short-yardage had nothing to do with it. Fred can pick up short-yardage.

Editor-in-Chief, BUFFALO RUMBLINGS®
@BrianGalliford

by Brian Galliford on May 19, 2011 1:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

Then why shy away from letting him try?

"Opportunity is missed by most people because it comes dressed in overalls and looks like work." Thomas Edison

by HurricaneJay on May 19, 2011 1:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

poor run blocking

Please base your arguments in provable facts instead of pulling stuff out of your rear. -CanadianBillsFan- This is why talk is cheap because the supply always exceeds the demand.

by jbbillfan on May 19, 2011 1:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

O/L

A QB is like a King in chess, if you don't have one you lose! Get a QB Buffalo!
.

by buffalobacker on May 19, 2011 2:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

Bills third drive against Cincy

3rd and 2 - Shotgun
4th and 2 - Shotgun
2nd and 1 - Shotgun
4th and 1 - SHOTGUN

That one drive drove me to double my medication….

by BuffaloFanFromCT on May 19, 2011 12:51 PM EDT up reply actions  

Smackdown Jackson to replace Action Jackson?!

In the year two thousaaaaaaand.
In the year two thousAAAAAAND!

by TheAfghanTwilight on May 19, 2011 2:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

LOVE THIS!!

These types of articles are a LOT of work and I greatly appreciate it – it was a very enjoyable read. Time permitting, I would love to see more breakdowns of our defensive schemes and our offensive successes and failures.

Any chance we can do a game film breakdown of single players? For example, Fred Jackson breakdown in 2-3 games? How did he handle blitz pickup, etc.

by BuffaloFanFromCT on May 19, 2011 12:29 PM EDT reply actions  

Yeah, we can do single players if you like. I’m doing the Cincinnati game next, by popular request, so fire away.

Editor-in-Chief, BUFFALO RUMBLINGS®
@BrianGalliford

by Brian Galliford on May 19, 2011 12:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

Cincinnati

Would love to see how our defense played. Particularily our defensive players. While our offensive successes in that game are well noted – our defense allowed ZERO POINTS in the second half!!

Particular players in that game? None in particular except maybe Kelsay (I know a wierd guy to pick…). He got some decent pressure on Palmer – did he turn it on in the second half??

by BuffaloFanFromCT on May 19, 2011 12:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

Bengals Drive Summary in Second Half

2 plays 13 yards ended in a FUMBLE
13 plays 59 yards ended in an INT!
3 plays 0 (yes…ZERO) yards - ended in a punt
15 plays 51 yards - ended in a Missed FG
1 play 6 yards - ended in an INT
5 plays 2 yards -- GAME ENDED

So that’s slightly over 120 yards for Cincy in the second half which isn’t incredible for our D but 3 turnovers!!!! That has got to be caused by bad play from Cincy but good QB pressure as well. I’d bet my lunch that Kelsay (who I’m not a big fan of) and Edwards put some serious pressure on Palmer in this game

by BuffaloFanFromCT on May 19, 2011 12:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

Buffalo Drive Summary in Second Half

9 plays for 68 yards - Touchdown
8 plays for 49 yards - Touchdown
3 plays for 49 yards - Touchdown
5 plays for 23 yards - Punt
2 plays for 36 yards - Touchdown

What surprises me is there are only 5 drives in the second half for Buffalo. For some reason I thought they had more opportunities than that.

by BuffaloFanFromCT on May 19, 2011 12:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Buffalo Drive summary in first half

12 plays for 89 yards - Touchdown
2 plays for 2 yards - Intercepted Pass COME ON FITZ!
3 plays for 3 yards - Intercepted Pass SERIOUSLY FITZ!!
13 plays for 74 yards - Missed FG
4 plays for 56 yards - Touchdown

looks like both first and second halfs we were pretty darn successful against Cincy. Fitz’s mistakes in back to back picks cost us bad in the first half.

by BuffaloFanFromCT on May 19, 2011 12:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

OK – let’s steer this sucker back toward Baltimore. More on Cincy next week. :)

Editor-in-Chief, BUFFALO RUMBLINGS®
@BrianGalliford

by Brian Galliford on May 19, 2011 12:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

You just answered your own question. :)

My tendency is to focus more on personnel packages and formations when I do this. I will say this about the D in Baltimore, which I saw on occasion as I was fast-forwarding: LOTS of the heavy-front 4-3, with Stroud/Edwards at DE and Williams/Troup at DT.

Editor-in-Chief, BUFFALO RUMBLINGS®
@BrianGalliford

by Brian Galliford on May 19, 2011 12:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

My bad on the Offense Defense mix-up

I’m at work, so i read too quickly…great stuff though,

Didnt we hae a chance to seal the deal prior to OT but we turned it over?
Or am i thinkking of a different game…?

by Dingus Day on May 19, 2011 12:32 PM EDT reply actions  

Must be a different game. There were three turnovers – the first two came before the 10-point comeback in the fourth quarter, and the third was in OT.

Editor-in-Chief, BUFFALO RUMBLINGS®
@BrianGalliford

by Brian Galliford on May 19, 2011 12:34 PM EDT up reply actions  

You're thinking of the Kansas City Game

We were driving at the end of the fourth quarter and the ball must have slipped out of Fitzpatrick’s hand it was that bad, essentially it was a pop fly to the safety

Did I mention the tank is a tank?

by ArenZimm on May 19, 2011 12:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

If Cassel was a good QB, KC would have never sweat that win out.

In the year two thousaaaaaaand.
In the year two thousAAAAAAND!

by TheAfghanTwilight on May 19, 2011 2:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

Opening drives

It looks like the Bills were pretty heavy on the run and this opened up their passing game. They seemed pretty balanced in the first half. How did the game plan look to be working? Game was close but Buffalo was winning…

by BuffaloFanFromCT on May 19, 2011 12:54 PM EDT reply actions  

Second Half

Looks like they ran when they were under center then went Shotgun for all passes. By the end of the 3rd quarter Baltimore clearly caught on to this and took the lead. Any reason that Baltimore showed in the first half to make this plan look like it’ll work?

Fourth quarter looks like they went back to a mix of under center passing and shotgun passing and it looks like it showed better success.

by BuffaloFanFromCT on May 19, 2011 12:56 PM EDT reply actions  

Someone must have reminded Gailey that Jauron was fired and like to run his offense in similar fashion.

In the year two thousaaaaaaand.
In the year two thousAAAAAAND!

by TheAfghanTwilight on May 19, 2011 3:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

Point 6 - third down efficiency

The Bills were 11 for 17 on third down conversions (Ravens were 2 for 11 FYI).

That’s a huge plus. How bad have the Bills been on third down over the course of the last decade? Nauseatingly awful is how I would describe it.

by The Adam Bomb on May 19, 2011 1:10 PM EDT reply actions  

That's being generous

Whenever third down came up in prior seasons I thought, “the defense has them right where they want ’em” This past season it was a pleasant surprise to convert once in a while.

Here's hoping!

by mcmaurer on May 19, 2011 1:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

First point.

.

" Buffalo’s wide receivers torched Baltimore’s cornerbacks."
We are talking about our Bills and one of the better defenses in the leauge right? BASKING, BASKING, BASKING!!!

Stevie was just comeing into his “middle of the season dominence.” I dont think teams were really looking at him yet but they should have been. As long as our top four receivers are better then the opposing teams top four DB’s then I like the idea of playing out of the spred as long as it is a ballanced attack. This should be the case quite a bit next year as I am really liking the idea of Evans, Stevie, Parrish, and Nelson or Easley on the field at the same time. In order for that to work though the O-line has to be able to protect. If they can also get a little better at run blocking then that would maximize Freddies talents of getting a solid run out of a very small hole. With the defense having to worry about the four WR’s on the field there will be very little eight in a box so the rush attack could get some room.

Second point Fitz is going to be Fitz I am OK with him throwing a 1-2 Int game now and again if he can continue to points on the board. This is where the improved D comes into play. If teams are not up by one score or more at the half then they wont be pounding the rock at us 50 million times a game. Then we might actually get some turnovers from our DB’s. Wouldn’t it be nice to see our offense on the field in the second half running the ball down their throats for a change. (Sorry I was dreaming there!)

Third point Chan did have them set up in the gun too much last year IMO. I dont mind the spred, but we need to keep the defense honest and at least make them think we might run it on 3rd and 5 or less. I would like to see Fitz under center more this year. Also Chan did get away from the run a little quicker then I would have liked in some games. I think he just had very little confidence in his O-line run blocking. In his defense though he did say that he used the short pass in place of the run quite a bit, and I amOK with that in certain places against some teams.

Fourth point I hope Nelson gets another shot at being a contributor at TE. He has really had a rough go of it so far, but there is no dobt that he can be an impact guy if he can get on the field. How was his blocking in that game?

Fith point Agree completely.

Great post I love this stuff more than anything.

Please base your arguments in provable facts instead of pulling stuff out of your rear. -CanadianBillsFan- This is why talk is cheap because the supply always exceeds the demand.

by jbbillfan on May 19, 2011 1:23 PM EDT reply actions  

Darned blue boxes!?!?

Should have previewed.
Obviously the last half of that was me. Not a quote.

Please base your arguments in provable facts instead of pulling stuff out of your rear. -CanadianBillsFan- This is why talk is cheap because the supply always exceeds the demand.

by jbbillfan on May 19, 2011 1:25 PM EDT reply actions  

Formation

Was the Bills shift in formation a response to defensive adjustments by Baltimore?
Or, do we think this was being done based on the change in game score early in the second half?
OR, do we think it was done in order to keep Baltimore off balance, by changing the offensive look in the second half? A first half gameplan and a second half gameplan ready to go.

by greysquirrel on May 19, 2011 2:42 PM EDT reply actions  

I can only speculate, but I’m going to go with score. The Bills’ offense ran one play between being up 24-10 and being down 27-24 (two if you count a kneel-down to end the first half).

Editor-in-Chief, BUFFALO RUMBLINGS®
@BrianGalliford

by Brian Galliford on May 19, 2011 3:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

alright

this series is going to be amazing. Great idea Brian.

I was curious if anything stuck out to you about Leodis McKelvin on film that was of note. I’d be interested in hearing how you think McKelvin played last year as you go through this, with Drayton Florence a free agent and Terrence McGee potentially hurt, he could be our number 1 corner.

The bandwagon will be full and fast and drunk and exciting - Undee

by poz on May 19, 2011 2:52 PM EDT reply actions  

Again, this was just a review of the offense. :)

Editor-in-Chief, BUFFALO RUMBLINGS®
@BrianGalliford

by Brian Galliford on May 19, 2011 3:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

ahahah whoooops

The bandwagon will be full and fast and drunk and exciting - Undee

by poz on May 19, 2011 4:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

Technical question for Brian...

Not that I’ll have the time to ever do this myself, but I’m curious what your process was for reviewing/taking notes/drawing out overall themes. Did you re-watch any or all plays? It just sounds like a lot of fun to analyze, but also a lot of work. What was your system?

by dinendal7 on May 19, 2011 3:04 PM EDT reply actions  

I re-watched every offensive play. For each play, I’d first update the rep counter for each player on the field, then I’d chart down and distance, personnel package, formation, play type (run or pass), play results and any notes on what occurred.

Editor-in-Chief, BUFFALO RUMBLINGS®
@BrianGalliford

by Brian Galliford on May 19, 2011 3:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

Wow

sounds like work, thanks for effort Brian, its appreciated. No I don’t have something on my nose either! :)

A QB is like a King in chess, if you don't have one you lose! Get a QB Buffalo!
.

by buffalobacker on May 19, 2011 4:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sounds like torture, but definitely thank you, Brian.

"Slowly all the roles we act out become our identity. And in the end we are what we pretend to be." - Jerry Cantrell.

by stetzwebs on May 19, 2011 4:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

Beating the blitz

If I remember the game correctly, didn’t the Bills beat a couple of Raven’s blitzes, resulting in touchdowns?? I seem to remember both Evans and Johnson doing all the right things on a couple – I’m not sure of the slants were the basic playcall, or the adjustment to the blitz read…your thoughts??

by Sward8 on May 19, 2011 8:16 PM EDT reply actions  

The wrinkle that Gailey came up with where Levitre pulled on pass plays was brilliant. It was one of the first times where I saw Gailey as being different than Jauron. Jauron would just do the same thing game after game pinning his hopes on better execution. Gailey helped mask the weakness at RT while simultaneously giving Fitz great throwing lanes.

It can always get worse. Let me tell you how.

by Ron From NM on May 19, 2011 9:46 PM EDT reply actions  

I was at this game...

wearing my Bills gear. Since I live in Maryland this is one of the only opportunities I get to watch the team in person. What a great game, I only wish that the Defense had held up and that the lack of forward progress play were just that…oh well.

I can’t tell you how many Ravens fans told me they should have lost that game and that Buffalo was under-rated…

1964 and 1965 League Champions, and don't you forget it!

by Rob B on May 20, 2011 7:41 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

SB Nation's home for all things Buffalo Bills.
Community Guidelines :: Essential BR

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Bills_small
An Exploration of Ryan Fitzpatrick's TDs and INTs
Small
Beyond the Perfect Offseason: Where Do We Go From Here?
Dsc00843_small
NFL Divisional Record And Playoff Berth Correlation, 2002-2011

Recent FanPosts

Small
Who Will be the Number 2?
Spikes_small
Remaining Free Agents
04_buffalo_bills_football_coloring_at_coloring-pages-book-for-kids-boys_small
Mock 2012 Season
Small
The Return of the Running Back(s): Revisiting the Road to the Super Bowl
Small
Difference Between A "Franchise" QB and an "Elite" One
303857_872291743296_10504698_40499694_6362492_n_small
Be A Little Nicer Please, Bills Fans  :)
Cyclops1-12nd7cv_small
Current QB Wins
Small
The Count-Down to the Right Numbers
Bruuuuce_small
Ranking All 32 NFL Starting QB's : Who is ELITE?
Snapshot_20120113_small
Next Stop: 3rd Generation of Winners

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Screen_shot_2012-03-07_at_6 Brian Galliford

100_2488_small MattRichWarren

Authors

Range_march_2011_small Ron From NM

Slide1_small Der Jaeger

Moderators

Sucks_small Kurupt

Mrsinister03_small sireric

Cordy_small poz