Bills 2010 Film Review: Confirming Suspicions, Week 11
Let's keep the good times rolling covering the Cincinnati Bengals in our Buffalo Bills re-watch, because the next two games on our schedule will be all downhill. After the Bills' come-from-behind 49-31 win over Cincinnati in Week 11 last year, fans were generally feeling good. It's not often we get to see the Bills go on a 42-3 run in a single game, after all.
I've read through our post-game recap, Der Jaeger's post-game analysis and Ron's O-Line analysis, and I've taken a few notes worth sharing.
- I'm still rather pleased with this line from the recap: "A phenomenal second-half performance, which can be accurately described as equal parts Bills heart and Bengals shart, yielded 35 consecutive points to Buffalo."
- DJ pointed out the rough patch Rian Lindell had just hit. Between missing a game-winning field goal in overtime, missing another field goal and plunking a kickoff out of bounds against Detroit, and another miss in Cincinnati, Lindall was pretty brutal from Weeks 9 through 11.
- However, DJ also gave props to the defense in the second half, and I don't know that I'd go that far. Carson Palmer and the Bengals were still able to mount two fairly methodical scoring drives in the half. One ended in an interception (an obvious plus) and the other in a missed field goal. And sure, there were two more turnovers and a touchdown. They made more plays, but they still gave up quite a bit - especially when the game was not yet in hand.
- Finally, DJ wrote that Chan Gailey "went for the jugular" when the Bengals lost starting safeties Roy Williams and Chris Crocker. Boy, did he. The offense was unstoppable from late in the second quarter on, putting up five touchdowns in that time frame - four of them through the air. This was after Ryan Fitzpatrick threw three interceptions (one nullified by penalty) in the first quarter and a half.
- Ron pointed out Eric Wood's issues with the spin move, writing that it was at least the second time he'd seen Wood beaten by it. I have seen it three times in this re-watch, and we're only talking about a six-game window.
- Ron didn't touch much on Kraig Urbik in his write-up, and for good reason (to me): he doesn't really stand out. He's a big guy, and that's a big asset, but he's not a great athlete and not especially physical. I'm interested to see him over the next couple of games, before his season ended.
- Demetrius Bell and Mansfield Wrotto got equal pass blocking grades from Ron, but in this one contest, I thought Wrotto was significantly better than Bell, especially early. Bell struggled with Michael Johnson all day, and though he was better in the second half, he still got thrown around quite a bit. Not his best game by any stretch.
9 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Lindell is brutal all around, and I don’t understand why the guy get’s a pass. Yes he has that statistic about how he’s made 80% or what not from inside 40 yards, please correct me if I am completely off base, but I see that statistic as being similar to the one Fitz had last year where he had the second best completion percentage in the league behind Peyton Manning, and that fell off the map in one game. It’s a good stat but one that fluctuates very often.
LIndell is just not good at all, and I have thought so since the Pittsburgh game in 2004 when he missed a chip shot in the third quarter and completely deflated the Bills. He is not dependable under any sort of pressure and it baffles me why the Bills have not addressed the kicking situation and this guy continues to get a pass.
by SeanKav9 on Jun 17, 2011 1:37 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
I think you’re probably being a bit too harsh on him. He has made plenty of big kicks in Buffalo, as well as missing his fair share. He’s a good kicker – he’s not a great kicker, nor a clutch kicker like Vinatieri. This was a bad stretch for him.
Editor-in-Chief, BUFFALO RUMBLINGS®
@BrianGalliford
by Brian Galliford on Jun 17, 2011 1:41 PM EDT up reply actions
He comes off as streaky to me.
IMO he can get down when he see’s the team playing poorly.
Please base your arguments in provable facts instead of pulling stuff out of your rear. -CanadianBillsFan- This is why talk is cheap because the supply always exceeds the demand.
I agree
But we can sit here and say how terrible he is, but can you think of anyone that we can replace him with? That you can say with out a doubt, that he’s dependable.
So we are stuck with him until something better comes along.
He’s suspect at best, and yes Jeff Reed was on waivers last season mid November and has a much stronger leg than Lindel and similar overall numbers.
Jeff Reed is also an idiot, and perhaps the biggest off-field risk you’ll find in a kicker this side of Mike Vanderjagt.
Editor-in-Chief, BUFFALO RUMBLINGS®
@BrianGalliford
by Brian Galliford on Jun 17, 2011 1:57 PM EDT up reply actions
Jeff Reed just boozes a lot and he’s really no different than any Bills fan you’ll see in the bathroom at the Ralph, which yes could be a problem. But Vanderjagt yes was an absolute idiot who just never shut his mouth.
Overall i think Lindell needs some competition to light a fire under his belt to really see if he’s got a bit left in the tank, because bad teams need good kickers who can get them wins in games like the Baltimore one.
But Brian I have a feeling we will revisit this in the upcoming season and I will be the first to jump all over Lindell and I’ll take credit where credit is due.
Go BILLS.

by 































