Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Safety Ryan Clark's Motivational Workout

Name Buffalo's Three Most Important New Starters

Photo

I was recently having a conversation with a good friend of mine about the Buffalo Bills - as you might imagine, I spend a great deal of time talking about the Bills - and was asked by said friend to name the three most important new starters that the Bills have going into the 2011 season. That question was an easy one for me to answer in person, and I get the sense most of you will agree with me here (though, as always, arguments for other players are encouraged).

By my count, as of right now, the Bills have penciled in seven new starters on offense and defense. With proper apologies to the likes of Scott Chandler, Kraig Urbik, Erik Pears and George Wilson, I'm focusing this argument on three front seven defenders.

1. DE Marcell Dareus. The No. 3 overall pick in April's draft is a 340-pound behemoth with a fully guaranteed contract that's being asked to come in and be the focal point of the team's efforts to reach, at minimum, respectability defending the run. That's an awful lot to ask, and it speaks not only to just how much faith the organization has in Dareus, but also how desperately they need him to perform immediately.

Star-divide

2. OLB Shawne Merriman. He's appeared in just 18 games over the past three seasons, yet a few strong training camp practices have Merriman's name buzzing amongst the fan base. Until the pads start popping and the action is live, Merriman is still a huge (calculated) risk the team is taking. Merriman's here to shore up a pass-rushing unit that is consistently one of the league's worst.

3. ILB Nick Barnett. Just today, Bills GM Buddy Nix told Ross Tucker (Sirius NFL Radio) that he thought Barnett was an upgrade over the man he's replacing, the ultra-popular Paul Posluszny. Though Barnett is also an injury risk, he represents a significant upgrade in the pass coverage department, where Buffalo's linebackers were absolutely abysmal in 2010. He, like Dareus, will also be asked to help shore up the run defense.

Three players. Three different (and very weak) areas of the defense. Three gambles that, if they pay off to their fullest potential, could help the Bills turn things around defensively very quickly. I don't see how any of the other four new starters can trump that, but perhaps one of you can convince me.

Comment 69 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Agreed..

Spot on as always Brian, if these three new additions produce and stay health we instantly have improved are defense as well as are team as a whole around instantly which should result in and improvement in the win column

Rrrawrrrr, rrrawrrr like a dungeon dragon-Busta Rhymes
"Maybe i'm talking fast or your just listening slow"

by Moe_frm_B_ on Aug 11, 2011 12:30 PM EDT reply actions  

got to go

1. Shawne Merriman – you can’t play a 3-4 defense if you dont have pass rushing linebackers. When hes Lights Out, hes the best in the business not named DeMarcus Ware. More than anyone else on the defense, a Shawne Merriman playing like Lights Out instantly makes our defense better.

2. Marcell Dareus – The best player in the April draft for a team that wanted defensive help against the run playing for the worst run defense I personally can remember watching. He is beyond crucial to this team.

3. Kraig Urbik – If Urbik’s power and strength can shine through and make him an asset in the running game this team will have three young interior lineman who can be a cornerstone of this team for a decade. The offensive line on this team is one of the worst in the league. If Urbik can man up it makes the situation look a whole lot better.

The bandwagon will be full and fast and drunk and exciting - Undee

by poz on Aug 11, 2011 12:30 PM EDT reply actions  

I like this list poz.

Urbik is huge as far as our Oline go. Going up against the NT/DT’s in our division we have to be strong up the middle of the line.

And the passrush is something much, much needed on this D. Merriman is going to be the man that says we do, or do not get pressure on the QB.

Now attending the Univ. of Hockey.

by bflo on Aug 11, 2011 1:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

I mean, if URbik can’t cut it, I really think we should put Hang back at center and Wood at RG. To maximize the talent on the field. Sure center might not be quite as good, but the interior did a decent job last year.

by greysquirrel on Aug 11, 2011 1:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think if he can’t cut it that Rinehart was at least pretty ok filling in last year, I was a bit surprised that they went with Urbik in this training camp, but I guess that is because “they would have drafted him”, “he was on their board next”……… I think Hang will only see the field as a back up here on out and I think that is fine really.

by zoomer02 on Aug 11, 2011 1:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

i agree poz, except..

Id go with pears over urbik only because rt has been a mess for a couple years now. Pears also has the added responsibility of keeping fitz upright. If he can add stability to that spot, it goes a long way for our o-line as a unit.

by bizarro bills on Aug 11, 2011 1:52 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Not to mention if urbik can’t cut it we have options. If pears cant cut it…well…Ruh-roh

by bizarro bills on Aug 11, 2011 1:54 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Hahaha,

well stated.

"It’s like I’ve always said, don’t tell me about the labor pains, just show me the baby. That’s what we’ve got to do. We’ve got to show you the baby, and the baby is winning." - Buddy Nix

by Schwing9 on Aug 11, 2011 3:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

hahahaha fair enough bizarro

totally get that argument

The bandwagon will be full and fast and drunk and exciting - Undee

by poz on Aug 11, 2011 4:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

Pears also has the added responsibility of keeping fitz upright.

? That’s the entire line’s responsibility. Ergo, Pears and Urbik both have that responsibility.

Editor-in-Chief, BUFFALO RUMBLINGS®
@BrianGalliford

by Brian Galliford on Aug 11, 2011 2:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

I understand that Brian, but my point would be that pears will be facing much more potent pass rushers. My apologies for not elaborating further.

by bizarro bills on Aug 11, 2011 3:10 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

My list would be:

1 – Merriman: He has a LOT to prove and can single handedly add a dimension to our defense it’s been lacking the past few years, if he’s healthy and returns at least partially to form.

2 – Pears: RT is a mess, and it’s an important position. Fitz plays better when he has time to go through reads and make smart decisions, and as a result he needs solid protection. If Pears can step up and solve the catastrophic problem we have had at RT, then he will be the most important new starter.

3 – Urbik: Same basic reasoning as Pears, except to add that I’m a little shocked Hang isn’t starting here. OBD certainly sees something in him that I haven’t yet.

While I think that our run defense is important, I think that Fitz is more important, and therefore I think that the OL is going to go a long way toward winning games this year.

"Slowly all the roles we act out become our identity. And in the end we are what we pretend to be." - Jerry Cantrell.

by stetzwebs on Aug 11, 2011 2:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree

And going back to last year’s Super Bowl, Galliford made the argument that what separated a team like Green Bay from Buffalo was not depth so much as having elite players at multiple positions. Dareus and Merriman both have very good chances of playing at elite levels this year. If that happens, the Bills defense, and the team overall, will far exceed the current expectations.

Check out buddynixon.com for more of my work.

by cjf4 on Aug 11, 2011 12:34 PM EDT reply actions  

I'm waiting for the first person to argue,

What about Jasper? A lot of people seem to have him penciled in as an all-pro already. Seriously, Dareus, Barnett and Merriman are the top 3.

by loupiccone on Aug 11, 2011 12:34 PM EDT reply actions  

Jasper wont be a starter until 2014

He is so completely unrefined and just not ready to play pro football, I agree that he will be a starter in the nfl but not this year and probably not next year if we stay healthy

by badnewsBills on Aug 11, 2011 12:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

No arguing...

but I know he is a lot of Bills fans “guilty pleasure”! He’ll see some time w/ Troup being sidelined. It will be fun to see the BIG MAN in action…but clearly a work in progress.

by Dareurush! on Aug 11, 2011 12:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

I can’t wait to see him in preseason games.

"There is not a loser in this room." Marv Levy.

by SERGEANT MAJOR THOR on Aug 11, 2011 7:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

I agree w/ your assesment..

Dareus, Merriman, Barnett…If these guys do there jobs it will carry over to the rest of the Defense. On paper it looks to be a much improved Def. from last season. But will it translate on the field the way we believe it should. If healthy, I say YES. I see more 3 and outs, pressures, sacks all translating to turnovers giving our Offense more opportunities to put some points on the board. HEALTH=SUCCESS.

by Dareurush! on Aug 11, 2011 12:37 PM EDT reply actions  

please god let them all stay healthy as long as possoble

by snakebyte18 on Aug 11, 2011 12:38 PM EDT via mobile reply actions   1 recs

Agree for this season

I think long term we have to consider Sheppard, Searcy and Williams a little more but for 2011 those three are far and away the most important and prob in that order too.

by Wyrd UpSide on Aug 11, 2011 12:44 PM EDT reply actions  

Off Topic...

With the NFL Network showing all 64 Pre-Season games this year. Does anyone know the schedule of the Bills games and when they will air? I live outside of Denver so I know they will be aired at a later time probable @ 3:00 am w/ my luck. I need to set my DVR. Please, any info would be great! Thanks and LET’S GO BUFFALOOOO!!!

by Dareurush! on Aug 11, 2011 12:45 PM EDT reply actions  

7 PM Sunday, 4PM Wednesday

"Big Gulps Eh, Well See ya later" - Lloyd Christmas
" You Gus ready To Let The Dogs Out" "What?" " you Know, Who Let the dogs out rough rough rogh rough" - Zack Galifinakis - The Hangover

by PaullyPforPrez on Aug 11, 2011 12:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

Buffalo time

"Big Gulps Eh, Well See ya later" - Lloyd Christmas
" You Gus ready To Let The Dogs Out" "What?" " you Know, Who Let the dogs out rough rough rogh rough" - Zack Galifinakis - The Hangover

by PaullyPforPrez on Aug 11, 2011 12:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

Thank You! Where did you find the tv sched.? Planning ahead….Thanks again!

by Dareurush! on Aug 11, 2011 12:48 PM EDT up reply actions  

Is it sad that I purchased the NFL.com preseason package just so I could watch the games live?

"You are every bit as good as everyone else, but not one bit better."
-Eldred Lee

by arbon78 on Aug 11, 2011 12:59 PM EDT up reply actions  

nope, I did the same :)

The bandwagon will be full and fast and drunk and exciting - Undee

by poz on Aug 11, 2011 1:05 PM EDT up reply actions  

I definitely paid the $20 to see them live too

by crooked5 on Aug 11, 2011 1:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

My question is this

We assume the 4 new defenders are going to Merriman, Wilson, Dareus and Barnett.

But like you alotted to last week was that you think Davis will be released that makes a new 5th starter. That also is a very very important position when it comes to:
1.) Stopping the run
2.) Helping Nick Barnett do his job.

That being said I would only argue this point in favour of George WIlson being very important. There were 2 things this defense SUCKED at last year,
1.) Stopping the run
2.) Covering TE’s up the seam – This is where George Wilson comes in in my books. If he can perform at a level higher then Donte Whitner, This alone improves this defense. We have all seen first hand what a good SS can do for a defense (Eric Berry, Troy Palamalu, Ed Reed) if we get above average SS play our defense will improve!

"Big Gulps Eh, Well See ya later" - Lloyd Christmas
" You Gus ready To Let The Dogs Out" "What?" " you Know, Who Let the dogs out rough rough rogh rough" - Zack Galifinakis - The Hangover

by PaullyPforPrez on Aug 11, 2011 12:46 PM EDT reply actions  

I don't see a question here

"Does this look as bad as it looks?" -Archer

by JTM1023 on Aug 11, 2011 1:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

Here

?? Theres two.

Baby steps are for babies. Step it up buffalo!

by buffalobacker on Aug 11, 2011 1:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

Haahaha I got going on the point I was trying to make and forgot to ask

What if Davis gets released hahah how important would that 5th starter be

"Big Gulps Eh, Well See ya later" - Lloyd Christmas
" You Gus ready To Let The Dogs Out" "What?" " you Know, Who Let the dogs out rough rough rogh rough" - Zack Galifinakis - The Hangover

by PaullyPforPrez on Aug 11, 2011 2:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

Merriman, Barnett, Dareus

Merriman
-create the pass rush sense of urgency for qb
Barnett
-better coverage than poz hard nosed football player
-if you watch him practice, he practices hard… Last night cracked spiller in a hole
Dareus
-fills holes penetrates with number 95 leaves Merriman room

twitter @davidjpalermo

by sketchydave on Aug 11, 2011 12:50 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

Most important new starters.

I EXPECT Merriman and Barnett to improve our defense. I expect at mimimum better than last season. So that would lead me to think that our most important new starters would be Dareus, Pears and Chandler. Dareus needs to hold on for the whole season and learn and progress each week, tough to ask for from any rookie. Pears and Chandler, neither has the following of Merriman or Barnett, there is a level of what to expect here. Those two will be key’s to pass protection and run blocking into the second level.

Our Right Tackle and Tight End positions a year ago were unknown. We rotated guys in and out all season for various reasons. These two guys whether you like them or not represent the stability this offense needs. That in itself proves very important to me. The fact that there is little to know depth at RT makes that spot even more important. Our offense should be improved this year but it should be expected to be largely improved if these two guys can step forward and close the door on those two spots. This is a good topic to argue. Barnett, and Merriman are huge additions and we have been focused on when they will get injured more than what they bring as healthy players.

YOU ARE OUT of you kuku fufu mine craker laker Flaber baber FUNKI chunki brain. WE want to winn every year -- abayarde

by VanScottM on Aug 11, 2011 12:50 PM EDT reply actions  

By the By...

How is Dareus doing in camp? Haven’t heard too much about him.

"Aw snap, aw snap, come to my macaroni party and we'll take a nap!"

by J0ckam0 on Aug 11, 2011 12:52 PM EDT reply actions  

Erik Pears

Erik Pears has to be one of our most important new starters. If he decides to go all Cornell Green on us we are looking at another lost season. With all of the complaining on here about the lack of talent/depth at tackle, i was shocked not to see him in the top 3

by TONYTHEBAT on Aug 11, 2011 1:04 PM EDT reply actions  

I agree, I think Barnett is close, but Pears is defiantly the third most important starter. I actually put Barnett fourth as I think Wood follows Pears. Wood needs to play at a near pro bowl level, he needs to become are Nick Mangold.

by eze on Aug 11, 2011 1:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

meh

We don’t need no stinking O/L. Thats so 2000 and late!

Baby steps are for babies. Step it up buffalo!

by buffalobacker on Aug 11, 2011 1:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think the most interesting thing about this article is that we found out Brian has friends – huh – who knew? ;)

by J2 on Aug 11, 2011 1:23 PM EDT reply actions  

I believe I mentioned just one friend, if you want to get all technical about it.

Editor-in-Chief, BUFFALO RUMBLINGS®
@BrianGalliford

by Brian Galliford on Aug 11, 2011 2:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

Top five...

1 merman
2 Barnett
3 pears/irbil tie
5 dareus

Troup and carrington and johnson are going to play a ton, and the first two could be way better this year.
Spelling apologies, new technologies….

Gobills

PodunkO - The great post ender!

by podunkowego on Aug 11, 2011 1:31 PM EDT reply actions  

So what?

So Barnett is an injury risk. So was Pozslusny. They’ve missed roughly the same amount of games in their careers, haven’t they? And Poz has not been in the league as long. Barnett is an upgrade apples to apples.

by BuffaloOwdaTwnr on Aug 11, 2011 1:37 PM EDT reply actions  

The answer to your “so what?” question is that he’s not helping us if he’s not on the field.

Editor-in-Chief, BUFFALO RUMBLINGS®
@BrianGalliford

by Brian Galliford on Aug 11, 2011 2:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

The answer to so what is an equally vague idiom?

That applies to every player. BuffaloOwdaTwnr is just saying that if a guy is an injury risk and replaces another injury risk but the replacement has more talent/skill you upgraded.

My beingadick-butnotbeinganannoyingdick skills, they're impressive.
-TCWIR paraphrased

by BD34 on Aug 11, 2011 2:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Thanks

You expressed my point my clearly than I was able to. You nailed it.

by BuffaloOwdaTwnr on Aug 11, 2011 2:47 PM EDT up reply actions  

That, to me, is like saying the Bills would have upgraded last year had they replaced Marcus Easley with Randy Moss.

Editor-in-Chief, BUFFALO RUMBLINGS®
@BrianGalliford

by Brian Galliford on Aug 11, 2011 2:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

The point being that every player is a risk for injury and assuming otherwise is naive in evaluating players.

Being injury prone is something fans tend to be kneejerk about (Trust me, I’m a writer for the Houston Rockets site) but when it comes down to it if a player shows equal injury risk as another you’re stuck evaluating talent. There’s no guarantee a player stays upright, freak injuries happen. If you have a chance to get your hands on a quality player and only have to worry “Could he break a leg?” Well, yes, anyone can break their leg. You pull the trigger if you need the spot filled. It’s not about finding an iron man out there when you’re the Bills, it’s about giving guys a shot, letting them develop, and trying to turn the team into a winner because God knows we’re not attracting a pro-bowler full season of health, gamebreaker to Buffalo until we land winning seasons left and right.

My beingadick-butnotbeinganannoyingdick skills, they're impressive.
-TCWIR paraphrased

by BD34 on Aug 11, 2011 2:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yes, every player is an injury risk, but they’re not all equal injury risks. Shawne Merriman is much more of an injury risk than Lee Evans or Kyle Williams. Accountability matters to coaches. This is the point I’m making.

Editor-in-Chief, BUFFALO RUMBLINGS®
@BrianGalliford

by Brian Galliford on Aug 11, 2011 3:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

No doubt it does, I'm just talking in player evaluations sometimes you have to divorce from a prone label.

Especially in the case of something like Posluzny and Barnett. Both guys stood to get injured and have in their careers. Barnett is praised by OBD of being an upgrade. Does he stand a risk to not be on the field? Yes. More so than Pos? Not necessarily. You have to make those calls from time to time due to a shortage of options being the Buffalo Bills.

My beingadick-butnotbeinganannoyingdick skills, they're impressive.
-TCWIR paraphrased

by BD34 on Aug 11, 2011 3:11 PM EDT up reply actions  

Does he stand a risk to not be on the field? Yes. More so than Pos? Not necessarily.

In the last three seasons, Paul Posluszny has played in 42 games. Nick Barnett has played in 29 in the same time frame.

Editor-in-Chief, BUFFALO RUMBLINGS®
@BrianGalliford

by Brian Galliford on Aug 11, 2011 3:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

Admittedly I haven't really looked into the types of injuries and the way the staff dealt with them.

Isn’t Green Bay poised to move on from many of the older players they had due to their post season success on the back of youngsters due to the injuries sustained? The gap in games played is major but some of that comes down to individual teams monitoring their players and evaluating whether or not to replace a guy/give a younger player a shot, no?

My beingadick-butnotbeinganannoyingdick skills, they're impressive.
-TCWIR paraphrased

by BD34 on Aug 11, 2011 3:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

I am really torn between Barnett and Pears

I think OLine has got to be better, but I feel like Fitz may/should be able to overcome inconsistent play with his knowledge of the system. That is, Fitz should be able to find hot reads, know where his outlets are, and above all, know where the pressure is coming from on D. Fitz’s communication with Wood or Hang will be crucial in that regard as well. Therefore, I think Fitz’s experience in the system alleviates the ‘pressing’ need for improved RT play (although would it have killed us to bring Gaither into camp?).
Regarding Barnett, I’m hoping that better DLine play from Dareus in the run game and better pass rush from Merriman/Batten/whomever can lead to less pressure on the pass D. I think that the importance of the level of play at his position at ILB, like the RT, will be determined by the level of play of those around him.

by WV2Buffalo on Aug 11, 2011 2:21 PM EDT reply actions  

Yes, I would have them tied for third place as well. Barnett could make a real difference, as Brian says, but if Pears gives us a strong push in our running game at RT that would be of equal importance.

by Macktruck on Aug 11, 2011 3:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

You’re right; I’ve almost entirely forgotten about our run game with all the media hyping our passing game. If Pears can sustain some blocks on the edge and hold the line, then Spiller could take a big step toward fulfilling his potential. I think Pears offering stability at a position that has been weak since Langston Walker got moved to the LT (and then cut) in the run game could benefit the team more than Barnett making 100 tackles.
I guess what I’m saying is, you’ve convinced me that Pears should be ranked #3.

by WV2Buffalo on Aug 11, 2011 3:41 PM EDT up reply actions  

Is Dareus really 340 Lbs? Is that really the ideal weight?

by vegasBILLSfan on Aug 11, 2011 2:26 PM EDT reply actions  

337.6 is actually the ideal weight so he’s not too far away.

by Xaviermw on Aug 11, 2011 2:31 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions   1 recs

He said in an interview with Ross Tucker today that he thought he was going to be playing nose tackle (idk why he thought that) so he bulked up in the offseason. Has lost some of the weight.

by crooked5 on Aug 11, 2011 6:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

I like this list Brian

it’s tough to not include Urbik, Pears, or even Bell (who I still feel needs to prove he is our LT of the future). However Dareus is a lock because since his name has been called at the draft he has been expected to come in and fix this 32nd ranked run D.

Merriman will be very important because it seems like the team is putting all their eggs in 1 basket hoping he creates the pass rush we so desperately need. Hopefully he stays healthy and has a great year.

I agree with you putting Barnett 3rd over the aforementioned offensive lineman because he has some pretty big shoes to fill. Yes Poz was the starting ILB and captain of the league’s worst run D but he also was the team’s leading tackler and that’s not any easy void to fill. If Barnett stays healthy then I think we will be fine and won’t even miss Poz, but if Barnett goes down for any length of time that leaves us with 2 rookies, a very aged Andra Davis, and an experimental tryout of Moats (who I hope moves back to OLB before the start of the season). That’s a very depleted staff then and filled with lots of question marks. Same as Merriman, I hope he stays healthy and rebounds this year as well.

"I promise you, ... When I come back, I'm going to be like a mad dog in a meat house." -Takeo Spikes

by panekattack on Aug 11, 2011 2:27 PM EDT reply actions  

Bell isn’t a new starter, though. :)

Editor-in-Chief, BUFFALO RUMBLINGS®
@BrianGalliford

by Brian Galliford on Aug 11, 2011 2:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

whoops

forgot that part haha

"I promise you, ... When I come back, I'm going to be like a mad dog in a meat house." -Takeo Spikes

by panekattack on Aug 11, 2011 2:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

Defensive line

J2 wrote about this as well, but I see an area of total weakness completely turned around if even two of the three new Nix-era lineman make an impact (Dareus, Troup, Carrington).

If that happens, the entire defense will be a lot better off and reap benefits, including Merriman and Barnett.

Starting the official Buffalo "Draft a Quarterback in the First Round in 2012" campaign.

by Der Jaeger on Aug 11, 2011 3:13 PM EDT reply actions  

Agreed. I’m not worried at all, in fact I’m pretty excited for, our DL.

"Slowly all the roles we act out become our identity. And in the end we are what we pretend to be." - Jerry Cantrell.

by stetzwebs on Aug 11, 2011 3:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

Just spending time at Training camp the first thing you notice is just how much bigger our line is currently than it ever was under Jauron. The depth is going to pay dividends this year, I think.

Check out buddynixon.com for more of my work.

by cjf4 on Aug 11, 2011 4:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

Good

I like the getting bigger aspect. It is a man’s game after all!

Baby steps are for babies. Step it up buffalo!

by buffalobacker on Aug 11, 2011 5:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

Think about a 3 man line of Troup at NT and Dareus and Williams at end

That line dwarfs the lines the team has had since Sam Adams left. I think in 2-3 years, the media is going to start trotting out lines like “the first thing we noticed is how big Buffalo is.”

I’d love it if Buffalo became a similar team to the Chargers or Jacksonville 4-5 years ago, where teams dreaded playing against them because they were so big and physical. Both those teams gave good fights to Super Bowl champs like the Pats and Steelers.

That would be a good type of team to become.

Starting the official Buffalo "Draft a Quarterback in the First Round in 2012" campaign.

by Der Jaeger on Aug 11, 2011 5:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

#1 Dareus #2 Dareus #3 Dareus

He’ll help stop the run, he’ll help Meatball, He’ll help the LBers.

by dgrid on Aug 11, 2011 3:36 PM EDT reply actions  

no pressure.

Ryan FitZpatrick - The Inconvenient Truth.

by kgun201 on Aug 11, 2011 5:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

Like your three, Brian.

On the OL I’ll say this much. I’m more confident in Pears at RT than I am with Bell at LT, and I don’t think I’m alone in that sentiment…

Go Buffalo Bills, Utah Jazz, and Arkansas Razorbacks

by Dyl on Aug 11, 2011 4:12 PM EDT reply actions  

To Me....

Bell missing practice because of a sore shoulder and not being able to handle merriman at all sounds real bad (he said stating the obvious). I am wondering why no one seems to be asking what’’s up with the shoulder? Since he had shoulder surgery last year…..and I wondering how come there are no stories about how much stronger he is now that he had the whole offseason to train injury-free. I would like to read that somewhere….there are stories about wood, troup and carrington being much stronger….what about Bell? Somebody please write about how healthy and how more powerful Bell is compared to last year…please?

gobills!
gobiolls!

PodunkO - The great post ender!

by podunkowego on Aug 11, 2011 4:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don't mean that Pears is more talented than Bell.

Honestly, they’re both meh-talent with ups and downs. But Pears is playing right tackle against mostly power rushers, which at his size, he’s built to do. Bell’s much the same, he’s got some ability to hold on against the speed rushers but he’s going to absolutely break against others.

My main concern is that, while it can be passable to have a stopgap at RT, it can be fatal to rely on a guy playing left tackle who’s good in a pinch. That’s all Bell seems to be in this league, a guy who can do the job well in a pinch. It doesn’t mean Bell is worse than Pears, it means he’s being trusted with much more.

Go Buffalo Bills, Utah Jazz, and Arkansas Razorbacks

by Dyl on Aug 11, 2011 6:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

Jasper For President!

Seriously though

1) Merriman – As much as I like Dareus I think Merriman will have a greater all around impact on the defense, especially if he is Lights Out. Heck he just needs to be Lights Out for the first two games of the season to scare teams for the other 14 games.

2) Dareus – Partly because he’s a rookie and partly because of changes on defense I think Dareus’s individual impact will be smaller THIS year. We also seem to have a fair bit of versatile depth on the DL.

3) Pears/Urbik – To be quite honest if we can get one quality starter from this pair, even if it’s half from each, it will be one of the biggest improvements on the team. If they don’t perform it will be interesting to see how OBD tries to resolve it since we don’t have much depth here. Quite honestly if things go bad enough I could see them trying some very unusual things at this position.

by Lifyre on Aug 11, 2011 4:18 PM EDT reply actions  

I like the list because...

Aside from Meatball this guys are the ones that have me excited about the D. If all 4 play well we will be a pretty formidable D. It is a god list. Spot on.

by muzza34 on Aug 11, 2011 6:06 PM EDT reply actions  

I vote for..........

All of them to stay healthy and step up their game!

Win-win!!!

"There is not a loser in this room." Marv Levy.

by SERGEANT MAJOR THOR on Aug 11, 2011 7:26 PM EDT reply actions  

Good stuff! Excited to see the new guys in action, and im really hoping merriman comes back strong.

"the man who created a legend; the legend who resurrected a franchise."

by chaucer on Aug 11, 2011 8:53 PM EDT via mobile reply actions  

Great question Brian

after sleeping on it-

1) Fitz if your going by starters from last years opener. Most important position on the field.

2) #56 as at full capacity he can be superstar level.

3) Wilson- ss is run support & we need help stopping the run.

  • #99 is a rookie w/Carrington as a back up. #50 has Moats behind him(?) who I want on the field amap. The right side of the oline may be interchangeable.

"Alright Men, lets go out there, bust um in the chops & get somebody bloody. If your not a superstar you best be sweating that ass off. Take the W in battle & make the Bills Nation Proud."

by Blood, sweat & Win on Aug 12, 2011 9:36 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

SB Nation's home for all things Buffalo Bills.
Community Guidelines :: Essential BR

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Bills_small
An Exploration of Ryan Fitzpatrick's TDs and INTs
Small
Beyond the Perfect Offseason: Where Do We Go From Here?
Dsc00843_small
NFL Divisional Record And Playoff Berth Correlation, 2002-2011

Recent FanPosts

Small
Who Will be the Number 2?
Spikes_small
Remaining Free Agents
04_buffalo_bills_football_coloring_at_coloring-pages-book-for-kids-boys_small
Mock 2012 Season
Small
The Return of the Running Back(s): Revisiting the Road to the Super Bowl
Small
Difference Between A "Franchise" QB and an "Elite" One
303857_872291743296_10504698_40499694_6362492_n_small
Be A Little Nicer Please, Bills Fans  :)
Cyclops1-12nd7cv_small
Current QB Wins
Small
The Count-Down to the Right Numbers
Bruuuuce_small
Ranking All 32 NFL Starting QB's : Who is ELITE?
Snapshot_20120113_small
Next Stop: 3rd Generation of Winners

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Screen_shot_2012-03-07_at_6 Brian Galliford

100_2488_small MattRichWarren

Authors

Range_march_2011_small Ron From NM

Slide1_small Der Jaeger

Moderators

Sucks_small Kurupt

Mrsinister03_small sireric

Cordy_small poz