Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Safety Ryan Clark's Motivational Workout

Brad Smith, Josh Nesbitt Key Wildcat In Buffalo

At around the same time that the Buffalo Bills were signing free agent Brad Smith to a four-year, $15 million contract, the team also announced the signing of undrafted free agent quarterback Josh Nesbitt, a Georgia Tech product. Little did we know at the time that the two signings were linked by a common theme: Chan Gailey's desire to use the Wildcat package offensively.

Initially, there was some doubt as to which position Nesbitt would play in Buffalo, given that he also had experience at safety. After the Bills' pre-season opener against Chicago, the answer is now clear: Nesbitt plays Smith's position as the Wildcat quarterback.

Smith was effective in the first half, carrying three times for 16 yards, and converting three plays into first downs. He also completed a pass for 11 yards, and lined up at receiver (as pictured). Nesbitt took over as the de facto Slash in the second half, carrying three times for 30 yards, including a 21-yard jaunt, against Chicago's reserves. In Smith, the Bills have a player they'll count on specifically in short-yardage situations - and in Nesbitt, they've got an understudy that they can stash on the practice squad.

It could not be more apparent that the Wildcat is here to stay in Buffalo - and that the plans Gailey is laying out could have longevity beyond Smith's tenure with the team.

Comment 111 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Nesbitt needs to throw

In the next preseason game. That will make the competition for back up QB really interesting. He’ll probably go PS, though, won’t he?

by ChuckBuffInFlo on Aug 15, 2011 10:19 AM EDT reply actions  

I'm torn

One on hand, I don’t like the wildcat. I am a stickler for the traditional offensive packages that don’t rely on catching the defense off guard and the decision making of our 3rd string quarterback. I would like to be able to beat opposing teams with traditional football talent.

On the other hand, I also want to be able to move the chains and put points on the board. And if this is what Gailey believes will help us do that more consistently, then I am on board…although barely.

I say “argh” to being a Bills fan!

"Slowly all the roles we act out become our identity. And in the end we are what we pretend to be." - Jerry Cantrell.

by stetzwebs on Aug 15, 2011 10:20 AM EDT reply actions  

I hate the Wildcat..... want to stop it...the answer is simple

Hit the “QB” on every play…..hit him hard and often…hit him even when he doesn’t touch the ball. Most QBs can’t take the punishment and be a threat to throw the ball. Once the threat to throw the ball is gone, defending the Wildcat is easy….see the Fins.

QB SMASHER KING KONG JASPER
Dareus will put you on you Dar-e-ass

If you ask a question you don't want an answer to, expect an answer you don't want to hear.

by Joe P. on Aug 15, 2011 10:30 AM EDT up reply actions  

I definitely agree that defending it is easy, and teams have caught on for the most part (especially in the AFC East where they’ve been dealing with the Fins doing it for a few years). But maybe Gailey can do something interesting with it.

"Slowly all the roles we act out become our identity. And in the end we are what we pretend to be." - Jerry Cantrell.

by stetzwebs on Aug 15, 2011 10:31 AM EDT up reply actions  

and as we discussed elsewhere, a suspect OL aids the opposition in whacking around our QB(s).

Y'all- There's a "D" in rebuild, but no "O"- The gospel according to Buddy Nix 4:12

by fansince60 on Aug 15, 2011 10:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

on a zone read...

half the time the QB doesn’t get hit, he hands it off…. this isn’t the triple option where the QB is attacking the defense

by jonramz on Aug 15, 2011 10:37 AM EDT up reply actions  

I hate the Wildcat….. want to stop it…the answer is simple

the difference between the Fins Wildcat and our wildcat is Smith can actually throw the football. I’m excited for it’s use in short yardage situations – this is going to be a chains moving formation for us – Chan will put Smith in a position in which he can run or pass – short yardage situations will be much more successful this year

by J2 on Aug 15, 2011 10:42 AM EDT up reply actions  

I second that

The reason the wildcat faded in miami is because ronnie and ricky can’t throw the ball. At practice wednesday night Smith tossed a 30-40 yarder Stevie (great catch by Stevie). That’s what will keep offenses on their toes with Buffalo.

Trample the weak, hurdle the dead!

by fansince83 on Aug 15, 2011 10:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

yeah, and in practice Trent Edwards beat out Fitz.....

how many 3rd down conversions does one pick 6 erase?

QB SMASHER KING KONG JASPER
Dareus will put you on you Dar-e-ass

If you ask a question you don't want an answer to, expect an answer you don't want to hear.

by Joe P. on Aug 15, 2011 4:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

*defenses

Trample the weak, hurdle the dead!

by fansince83 on Aug 15, 2011 10:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

I will belive it when I see it in the game
Smith can actually throw the football.

If he is that good, he should be our starting QB….otherwise, we will probably see opposing defense scoring more than Smith.

QB SMASHER KING KONG JASPER
Dareus will put you on you Dar-e-ass

If you ask a question you don't want an answer to, expect an answer you don't want to hear.

by Joe P. on Aug 15, 2011 4:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

We don’t run that version of the Wildcat. Our QB is Brad Smith, and he comes in for Fitzpatrick. Fitz isn’t on the field in our Wildcat package.

Editor-in-Chief, BUFFALO RUMBLINGS®
@BrianGalliford

by Brian Galliford on Aug 15, 2011 11:00 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

I think Fitzie stayed in on the far right at least once in Wildcat.

by ChuckBuffInFlo on Aug 15, 2011 11:06 AM EDT up reply actions  

That’s what I saw as well.

Check out buddynixon.com for more of my work.

by cjf4 on Aug 15, 2011 11:30 AM EDT up reply actions  

I at least know Levi Brown stayed in for a Wildcat formation late in the fourth quarter. I don’t think I noticed either Fitz or Thigpen stay in.

by Schrims on Aug 15, 2011 11:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

I am talking about Smith too

It isn’t like Smith is Big Ben and can take a consistent beating, right?

QB SMASHER KING KONG JASPER
Dareus will put you on you Dar-e-ass

If you ask a question you don't want an answer to, expect an answer you don't want to hear.

by Joe P. on Aug 15, 2011 4:44 PM EDT up reply actions  

@Stetzwebs

But the objective of every offense is to catch a defense off guard or at a disadvantage with personnel that can be exploited. The K-Gun did this effectively back in the day. The run and shoot, even a power running game uses itself to set up passes for a defense that will be keying to stop the run by bringing a safety up toward the line. So what difference does it make what formation they do it out of?

It’s the defense’s job to stop the offense however it is being run.

by phaze1 on Aug 15, 2011 2:35 PM EDT up reply actions  

The objective of an effective offense is to catch the defense off guard, yes, that I agree with. But not every offense is reliant upon it. Yes, Peyton Manning wants to catch the defense off guard. But if he doesn’t he still has the skills and players around him to produce, regardless. If our system is reliant upon out-foxing the defense, which I’m scare it will be, we don’t necessarily have the talent to beat them if they somehow out-fox us.

"Slowly all the roles we act out become our identity. And in the end we are what we pretend to be." - Jerry Cantrell.

by stetzwebs on Aug 15, 2011 3:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

We are trying to rebuild

And win games at the same time. Gailey is adapting to the talent on his team. That should be obvious at this point. Next step is O-line, a franchise QB, and probably some more talent at LB. From there we build depth and turn into a contender. He is being patient and they are building step by step. We as fans deserve to have a fun team to watch and to win some games, and I think CHIX gets that and are building that for us.

by fanick82 on Aug 15, 2011 4:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah, we’re definitely a fun team to watch, no doubt. I just worry that the option-spread-offensive thing that Gailey’s implementing will be figured out. Then we won’t be fun to watch or win any games.

"Slowly all the roles we act out become our identity. And in the end we are what we pretend to be." - Jerry Cantrell.

by stetzwebs on Aug 15, 2011 4:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

Take it to the next level

If the Pats were doing this everyone would call them geniuses. I like that we are taking this to the next level and trying to innovate a little bit. Lead don’t follow.

by Falls4Life on Aug 15, 2011 10:22 AM EDT reply actions   1 recs

This isn't the next level.....that would be Smith as the starting QB

which is probably why the Bills were interested in Newton.

QB SMASHER KING KONG JASPER
Dareus will put you on you Dar-e-ass

If you ask a question you don't want an answer to, expect an answer you don't want to hear.

by Joe P. on Aug 15, 2011 10:25 AM EDT up reply actions  

Multiple looks

Spread WRs, Standard Formations, Multiple Wildcat formations. Their offense is as flexible as their defense. If it comes together there is no way to game plan for that.

by Falls4Life on Aug 15, 2011 10:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

there is no way to game plan for that.

ha ha… I would imagine that Rexy and Billicheat will have a thing or two up their sleeves for gameplanning against it… one way will be “we’ll just outscore you” like they have done for so many years already.

by dabillsr1 on Aug 15, 2011 10:44 AM EDT up reply actions  

Stay ahead of the curve

Rex has only been the coach for a couple years…so he hasn’t really done anything for ‘many’ years. I agree the Pats just outscore but that is not a game plan against an offense. I agree it is effective though.

by Falls4Life on Aug 15, 2011 10:50 AM EDT up reply actions  

With all due respect, you can game plan for anything

Where things breakdown is when you have a crappy game plan or don’t have the players to execute the game plan.

QB SMASHER KING KONG JASPER
Dareus will put you on you Dar-e-ass

If you ask a question you don't want an answer to, expect an answer you don't want to hear.

by Joe P. on Aug 15, 2011 4:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

The Bills weren’t interested in Newton because of the Wildcat Joe – that would be stupid – they were interested in him because he was the best QB in the draft

by J2 on Aug 15, 2011 10:43 AM EDT up reply actions  

locker looked better

gabbert looked good too. of course, there is a small amount of additional talent on those teams. Cam’s delivery is solid, as is his arm strength, but he was low on a few, and they were almost exclusively 1 read plays.. of course, so were every offenses plays. preseason

by ThaRealTruth on Aug 15, 2011 2:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

Where that is true remains to be seen

but it is obvious that Chan is looking for Slash 2.0. And, IMO, this adds fuel to the fire that the Bills really did want Tebow.

QB SMASHER KING KONG JASPER
Dareus will put you on you Dar-e-ass

If you ask a question you don't want an answer to, expect an answer you don't want to hear.

by Joe P. on Aug 15, 2011 4:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

I just wanted to quickly add that Brad Smith screwed up a simple zone read on one of the wildcat plays (The one with the stiff-arm)

The DE did not crash the line, which is a clear give to the RB in that situation, I know it’s preseason, but still bothersome on a basic play

by jonramz on Aug 15, 2011 10:30 AM EDT reply actions  

We should cut him then

Unacceptable in the first pre-season game after two weeks on a new team.

by fanick82 on Aug 15, 2011 4:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

obviously you are being sarcastic… but your point about it being b/c of 2 weeks on a new team is completely wrong

the zone read is a basic basic spread offense running play… and the preseason is for practicing and practicing correctly, which includes making the correct reads. Reads that Brad Smith has made for all of his collegiate and professional career.

I was just pointing that out for people who find the x’s and o’s of football interesting, trying to help discussion.

Not just posting a sarcastic remark, trying to be funny… which you obviously failed doing so. Remarks like yours make it so people don’t post facts and views they have about football to make this a nice place to visit.

Thanks

by jonramz on Aug 15, 2011 4:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

well said...don't let it get to you

QB SMASHER KING KONG JASPER
Dareus will put you on you Dar-e-ass

If you ask a question you don't want an answer to, expect an answer you don't want to hear.

by Joe P. on Aug 15, 2011 4:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

I wasn't trying to be funny

I was trying to point out that there is time for criticism, but that time isn’t now. Yeah, he has made those reads before, but it is early. There has been minimal practice. No one as at top in-season form. That is why QB’s throw interceptions, running backs fumble, and receivers make drops; it happens. You picking out one negative thing out of many good things doesn’t make sense at this point in the juncture. Read the article on the Bills website….he talks about learning the terminology, his head swimming, adjusting to a new offense, etc.

by fanick82 on Aug 15, 2011 5:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

By that logic
I was trying to point out that there is time for criticism, but that time isn’t now…..

then we shouldn’t be giving them credit for the good plays either, right?

QB SMASHER KING KONG JASPER
Dareus will put you on you Dar-e-ass

If you ask a question you don't want an answer to, expect an answer you don't want to hear.

by Joe P. on Aug 15, 2011 5:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

The logic as I see it is that they’re rusty…so yes, you can still give them credit for good plays.

"Slowly all the roles we act out become our identity. And in the end we are what we pretend to be." - Jerry Cantrell.

by stetzwebs on Aug 15, 2011 6:49 PM EDT up reply actions  

but how do we know if the O did a good job or the D was rusty?

QB SMASHER KING KONG JASPER
Dareus will put you on you Dar-e-ass

If you ask a question you don't want an answer to, expect an answer you don't want to hear.

by Joe P. on Aug 15, 2011 7:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not sure, just subjective I guess. What I saw was a defense that came ready to play, despite it being preseason. 9 sacks is 9 sacks, even against a sad opponent like the Bears’ OL. So from my point of view, it was deserving of some credit. But I see your point, it’s all just subjective

"Slowly all the roles we act out become our identity. And in the end we are what we pretend to be." - Jerry Cantrell.

by stetzwebs on Aug 15, 2011 7:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

You should be jumping of happiness for getting him

by JoeSenior on Aug 16, 2011 7:43 PM EDT up reply actions  

I think

Its what the Dolphins did when they won the division. Tuna and Sparano knew that offensive line wasnt great, so they created this Wild Cat type of attack that played to the team strengths…

Until we can get consistant play on the OL this may be the best way for now

by doctork44 on Aug 15, 2011 10:32 AM EDT reply actions  

I used to be one of the biggest naysayers of the Wildcat offense. To me it was a stupid gimmicky, high school-esque formation that had no place in the professional game. My opinion has changed over the course of the last few seasons. I think, used sparingly (and I do mean sparingly), it can be a valuable tool in certain situations. I don’t mind this development for the Bills offense one bit. I think it will keep them on the field and moving the ball where drives in previous seasons would have been stalled. Especially this season, because I fear that our offensive line is going to be downright horrific. We’ll need some “gimmicks” to overcome that.

by The Adam Bomb on Aug 15, 2011 10:33 AM EDT reply actions  

Good post

The thing that made the Fins Wildcat effective, IMO, was that teams were not ready for it and that they could break the huddle and suddenly line up in it causing confusion. This is not the case with the Bills. Fitz out…Smith in…everyone knows what is about to happen.

QB SMASHER KING KONG JASPER
Dareus will put you on you Dar-e-ass

If you ask a question you don't want an answer to, expect an answer you don't want to hear.

by Joe P. on Aug 15, 2011 4:57 PM EDT up reply actions  

I like the Wildcat, if it works I like anything, but I would like to see them pass out of it more than other teams that have used it. Seems if there is a greater legitimate passing threat out of the Wildcat, the run option would be better as well.

by garcia76 on Aug 15, 2011 10:35 AM EDT reply actions  

but I would like to see them pass out of it more than other teams that have used it

I think this is precisely what they’re planning to do with Smith. It’s an honest to goodness QB option.

"Slowly all the roles we act out become our identity. And in the end we are what we pretend to be." - Jerry Cantrell.

by stetzwebs on Aug 15, 2011 11:54 AM EDT up reply actions  

It’s an honest to goodness QB option.

Which is why I like their version of “Wildcat” better. As mentioned by other posters, the original Wildcat has a rb line up as a qb which was effective for the dolphins a few years ago, but essentially signals run to the defense and also eliminates a player (the qb) as a viable threat. If a true qb option can be executed the defense is on their heels as all skill players must be accounted for, the qb as a double threat.

by garcia76 on Aug 15, 2011 1:14 PM EDT up reply actions  

#'s 4 & 5 qb

were more productive than 2&3.

Of course oline depth played a factor.

"Alright Men, lets go out there, bust um in the chops & get somebody bloody. If your not a superstar you best be sweating that ass off. Take the W in battle & make the Bills Nation Proud."

by Blood, sweat & Win on Aug 15, 2011 10:38 AM EDT reply actions  

I think Smith was pretty productive in his limited playing time. He did get us 4 first downs.

"Slowly all the roles we act out become our identity. And in the end we are what we pretend to be." - Jerry Cantrell.

by stetzwebs on Aug 15, 2011 11:55 AM EDT up reply actions  

seems to be

confident & strong.
3rd & short may be his game in the beginning.

"Alright Men, lets go out there, bust um in the chops & get somebody bloody. If your not a superstar you best be sweating that ass off. Take the W in battle & make the Bills Nation Proud."

by Blood, sweat & Win on Aug 15, 2011 12:54 PM EDT up reply actions  

I don't like it, but will have to live with it.

Wow, sounds like my married life. When the dolphins introduced it a few years back it was a very successful tool for them. It IMO shadowed all their offensive weaknesses which are apparent today. This doesn’t excite me one bit running a wildcat, I am an old fashion guy that loves the game as it was designed to be played, One QB, two RB’s 3 WR’s, no gimmicks, line up and let the chips fall. The strong will survive. This definately changes my Chan Gailey Vote to not sure for even longer.

YOU ARE OUT of you kuku fufu mine craker laker Flaber baber FUNKI chunki brain. WE want to winn every year -- abayarde

by VanScottM on Aug 15, 2011 10:39 AM EDT reply actions  

please report to the dog house immediately…your wife needs to speak to you.

Y'all- There's a "D" in rebuild, but no "O"- The gospel according to Buddy Nix 4:12

by fansince60 on Aug 15, 2011 10:44 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

she's used to it, it is our bond, rec'd/

YOU ARE OUT of you kuku fufu mine craker laker Flaber baber FUNKI chunki brain. WE want to winn every year -- abayarde

by VanScottM on Aug 15, 2011 10:54 AM EDT up reply actions  

Van...

If you want to go back to the “game as it was designed to be played” you should go back to the T formation of two receivers, two half backs, and a full back.

But I’ve been watching football a lot longer than you I would guess.

by mikeo76 on Aug 15, 2011 12:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

agreed, but I think you get my point.

I just don’t want the team to be included in the same sentence as the dolphins, unless we are playing each other.

YOU ARE OUT of you kuku fufu mine craker laker Flaber baber FUNKI chunki brain. WE want to winn every year -- abayarde

by VanScottM on Aug 15, 2011 12:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

maybe you would like to tell Chan this isn't the Wildcat?

QB SMASHER KING KONG JASPER
Dareus will put you on you Dar-e-ass

If you ask a question you don't want an answer to, expect an answer you don't want to hear.

by Joe P. on Aug 15, 2011 6:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

you can use the term if you’d like but fact is it’s different than Miami’s wildcat – that’s the point

by J2 on Aug 16, 2011 9:15 AM EDT up reply actions  

Who ever said we were running Miami's wildcat?
Why do people continue to call it a “Wildcat” ….

that is what was said. And the reason I use the term is because our HC offensive genius Chan Gailey said they were working on the Wildcat in the Bears game. Some people decided to get cute and it came back to bite them….that is the point.

QB SMASHER KING KONG JASPER
Dareus will put you on you Dar-e-ass

If you ask a question you don't want an answer to, expect an answer you don't want to hear.

by Joe P. on Aug 16, 2011 10:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

Who ever said we were running Miami’s wildcat?

They basically brought that to the NFL so I was pointing to that version because they started that trend – this is a different version

by J2 on Aug 16, 2011 10:35 AM EDT up reply actions  

I know that, but that is not what the comment you rec'd said

And until Smith starts throwing strikes in a game, the difference you are talking about is hypothetical.

QB SMASHER KING KONG JASPER
Dareus will put you on you Dar-e-ass

If you ask a question you don't want an answer to, expect an answer you don't want to hear.

by Joe P. on Aug 16, 2011 10:38 AM EDT up reply actions  

I thought it was inferred honestly

by J2 on Aug 16, 2011 4:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

Good Point

Le’ts name it then???? “Bradley’s Offense”

YOU ARE OUT of you kuku fufu mine craker laker Flaber baber FUNKI chunki brain. WE want to winn every year -- abayarde

by VanScottM on Aug 15, 2011 10:55 AM EDT up reply actions  

Buffalo Wild Wing???

Never confuse movement with action.
~Ernest Hemingway

by NolaBillsFan on Aug 15, 2011 10:58 AM EDT up reply actions  

But would the restaurant sue for copyright infringement? ;o)

by ChuckBuffInFlo on Aug 15, 2011 11:10 AM EDT up reply actions  

I don’t think they can. The restaurant franchise is Buffalo Wild Wings. With an s. This would be the Buffalo Wild Wing. Singular. I’m pretty sure this would be legal.

Plus Buffalo Wild Wings sucks so who cares? I hate that place.

by The Adam Bomb on Aug 15, 2011 11:13 AM EDT up reply actions  

Aw, now you went and hurt my feelings. ;o)

The one in Rochester (Henrietta) is quite good. At least I like it.

by ChuckBuffInFlo on Aug 15, 2011 11:39 AM EDT up reply actions  

no offense intended :)

but the one in Syracuse is horrible.

by The Adam Bomb on Aug 15, 2011 12:46 PM EDT up reply actions  

Wild Wings is awesome!!!!!!

"Aw snap, aw snap, come to my macaroni party and we'll take a nap!"

by J0ckam0 on Aug 15, 2011 11:55 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

How about ZOO?

Zone
Option
Offense

Year two is upon us.

by Buffalo for Eternity on Aug 15, 2011 11:01 AM EDT up reply actions  

I like it, but it’s already called the zone read.

Check out buddynixon.com for more of my work.

by cjf4 on Aug 15, 2011 11:31 AM EDT up reply actions  

What does Philly call it when they have their great running QB in?

Oh yeah, a potent offense

I prayed for patience and I'm STILL waiting for an answer

by Storeybox on Aug 15, 2011 11:04 AM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

das raycess!

Check out buddynixon.com for more of my work.

by cjf4 on Aug 15, 2011 11:31 AM EDT up reply actions  

How about the Buffalo Hump

And I quote

http://www.ehow.com/way_5306010_treatments-buffalo-hump.html
The buffalo hump itself is not a condition, but the symptom of an underlying condition. There are a number of possible causes for a buffalo hump, the most common include…..

a poor Oline and a coach who likes gadget plays.

QB SMASHER KING KONG JASPER
Dareus will put you on you Dar-e-ass

If you ask a question you don't want an answer to, expect an answer you don't want to hear.

by Joe P. on Aug 15, 2011 7:33 PM EDT up reply actions  

agree

It’s just using the QB as more of an option QB rather than “traditional” pro QB.

I like the new rule about inserting the 3rd qb in, think we’ll see more running QBs as a result.

by dgrid on Aug 15, 2011 12:00 PM EDT up reply actions  

think we’ll see more running QBs as a result

Completely agree that the NFL will continue to move toward the way of College and HS QB’s that are in the “systems” they are in today. Before you never wanted to risk a QB getting hit or running for fear that he wouldn’t be available to you because of injury. If you can coach up a “3rd QB” because of the new rules to have him dress each week to be your “Option run/pass QB” for certain situations, you could see teams move toward this direction very soon. The Bills certainly are not the first to do this… but teams have less risk making their own “slash” if for some reason that guy gets hurt, then you can take a Nesbitt and bury him on a practice squad until you need him should Smith get hurt and have to miss significant time.

by dabillsr1 on Aug 15, 2011 1:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

Soooooo......do you want to tell Chan it isn't the Wildcat?????

because that is what he called it.

QB SMASHER KING KONG JASPER
Dareus will put you on you Dar-e-ass

If you ask a question you don't want an answer to, expect an answer you don't want to hear.

by Joe P. on Aug 15, 2011 5:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

And IMO, subbing in a QB is MUCH different than subb in a WR or RB

QB SMASHER KING KONG JASPER
Dareus will put you on you Dar-e-ass

If you ask a question you don't want an answer to, expect an answer you don't want to hear.

by Joe P. on Aug 15, 2011 5:04 PM EDT up reply actions  

I see it more as a spread option then the traditional "wildcat" also.

As Brad Smith mentions, he’s running the same formations and motions that Fitz does. He just options or QB keepers available to him when he is in there.

To me the Wildcat is using the motion back to hold the perimeter defenders in their gaps in addition to having multiple RB’s in the back field.

I do agree with Joe. P though and worry about how many times we can run that before Brad gets worn down. He’s not a thickly built guy from what I could see.

by lonestar_ak on Aug 15, 2011 10:19 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

I've heard that Miami

is looking to move away from the Wildcat offense. Any truth to that?

I like the usage on 3rd and short – it seems that with someone like Smith taking the snap directly, that the quick forward motion and talent of the guy holding the ball in quickly moving into the gap, even with our inferior blocking we have a good chance of moving the ball forward a couple of yards before the defenders have time to react and close in. A throw once in a while from that lineup will keep the defenders honest.

by NoiseIsTheBestRevenge on Aug 15, 2011 11:11 AM EDT reply actions  

I like Nesbitt as a PS option

Stash him there and let him work on the throwing aspect of his game.

I’m not a huge fan of the Wildcat and have wondered why teams don’t drill the QB if he lines up out wide. If Fitz comes off the field, it is a bit more useful for this offense as another WR can be on the field for the threat of pass. I don’t think Brad Smith is a good enough passer to throw that often, but his running ability out of the formation is legit. He’s going to add a big play element that our run game sorely needs.

~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."

by Kurupt on Aug 15, 2011 11:22 AM EDT reply actions   1 recs

Yeah, it makes way more sense to get a “useful” player out there as opposed to splitting out the quarterback. Having a good blocker or another set of receiving hands would better the odds of success on any given play. It would also be nice if the Bills could figure out how lead blocking works.

  It might work once or twice to line up Brad Smith out wide and fake the end around, have Fitzie do a draw or something up the middle.

Another season (maybe), another year getting on the roller coaster. Hope the ride lasts more than 16 games :)

by syrbillsfan on Aug 15, 2011 1:17 PM EDT up reply actions  

Nesbitt is a BEAST

Second best player I have watched go through GaTech. Tough as nails and is not afraid to take a hit. Also can through the ball when given time and a good jump ball receiver. Definatley will make a great practice squad stash.

Go Bills & Jackets

by gmeyer on Aug 15, 2011 11:23 AM EDT reply actions  

just hope he doesnt get plucked off our PS

by dgrid on Aug 15, 2011 12:02 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sorry; compelled to disagree

I saw a different player in the many Tech games I watched. I’m not a research guy (someone jump in here), but his throwing “ability” is way below average. I don’t think he could have played QB for a BCS team with a conventional offense. He is tough, an above average running QB, and a good athlete so I respect him. But if he was signed by another team as a QB I would…..

by GPSjr on Aug 15, 2011 1:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

You can get rid of Buster Davis without keeping Josh Nesbitt.

Editor-in-Chief, BUFFALO RUMBLINGS®
@BrianGalliford

by Brian Galliford on Aug 15, 2011 11:36 AM EDT up reply actions  

I thought busters only target during the game was not catchable.

"This is a chance to shine some light on the city, They say it’s too cold. I’m going to bring some warmth to it." Marcell Dareus

by matthew62 on Aug 15, 2011 11:36 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Okay

"This is a chance to shine some light on the city, They say it’s too cold. I’m going to bring some warmth to it." Marcell Dareus

by matthew62 on Aug 15, 2011 11:47 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Way too late to the party, in my opinion.

Miami abandoned it in large part because the gimmick of threatening to throw wasn’t as dangerous as actually having a (suspect at best) QB throw the ball.

I believe it’s important for this team to learn to be better, to be more dominant than their competition. I don’t believe it’s best to try and out-trick them.

In the year two thousaaaaaaand.
In the year two thousAAAAAAND!

by TheAfghanTwilight on Aug 15, 2011 12:01 PM EDT reply actions  

Yes, but one way to be more dominant is to out-think your opponent. Remember when the opponent’s LBs could look at the Bills offense and call out whether it was a run or pass? We don’t want that happening any more.

by Krenn on Aug 15, 2011 12:18 PM EDT up reply actions  

Remember when the opponent’s LBs could look at the Bills offense and call out whether it was a run or pass?

Yes, this!

We need to tire the opposing defenses not just physically but mentally, one way to do that is not to let them get into any kind of comfort zone.

That’s where the wildcat (when well-run) fits in: the more confusion we cause, the more time Fitz has to drop back on other plays.

by cmeid on Aug 15, 2011 12:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

“I believe it’s important for this team to learn to be better, to be more dominant than their competition. I don’t believe it’s best to try and out-trick them.”

You have to do both, especially at the professional level. You’ve got to win the one on one battles for sure, but you also need to catch players out of position by confusing them as well. I believe one is just as important as the other.

by The Adam Bomb on Aug 15, 2011 1:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

They should..

First cut Levi Brown, second give Nesbitt more reps throwing and/or running the ball and third list Brad Smith as a wide reciever. If they have Nesbitt on the PS then other teams might like what they see in the wildcat with him and take him. I like Nesbitt, I liked him in college so I dont want to see that happen.

by matt1239 on Aug 15, 2011 12:57 PM EDT reply actions  

Wildcat + Spread

Having both of these packages viable should help the Bills, especially once the weather turns and the spread is made less effective. We know from watching the Pats nearly undefeated run in 2007 that the spread alone will not see you through the winter and playoffs, unless you’re in domes. Having the wildcat personnel to offset this may pay dividends later in the season. I still worry about the lack of a power running game. Nothing looks sillier than lining your back up 5 yards or so behind the line of scrimmage on 3rd & inches.

Another season (maybe), another year getting on the roller coaster. Hope the ride lasts more than 16 games :)

by syrbillsfan on Aug 15, 2011 1:10 PM EDT reply actions  

When Smith is in there it isn't the Wildcat.

I would like to see Smith throw more though. Nesbitt can run with the best of them but I don’t know if he can throw. I think they will get more passing reps as the pre-season goes on.

Twitter @J_Clark_1989

by NCblofan on Aug 15, 2011 1:22 PM EDT reply actions  

Keep in mind it's the preseason...

We are still trying out different players and packages in different situations. Call it what you will, wildcat or otherwise, but with Brad Smith behind center, you are going to get an option-style mix of run and pass. Bottom line is he’s a football player – a guy who can catch the ball, throw the ball, run the ball, make plays and move the chains. Exactly how we plan to use him when it counts still remains to be seen. But I think he will be a huge assett to the offensive and will draw attention from opposing defenses in their gameplanning.

by BKLYN Bills Fan on Aug 15, 2011 2:00 PM EDT reply actions  

i like that we line up in a "normal" 4wr look

but that the threat of run still exists. i think that Chan agrees with John Gruden that running a spread style offense will allow less of a learning curve for young players, as most of them already run spread in college (gruden has commented multiple times that if he got a chance to come back, this is what he would do). I think it is pretty smart to recognize that if the players transition is less extensive, their opportunity for some level of immediate success increases; and additionally, the pool of potential players increases dramatically.

by ThaRealTruth on Aug 15, 2011 2:08 PM EDT reply actions  

Don't make Judgements Yet

We won’t see half of what Gailey will have Smith running during the season or the formations or the personnel in those packages. Smith will run, throw and catch. Don’t be surprised to see him start under center, motion out to WR or back to RB and Fred or CJ take over the “QB” spot, etc. Smith allows for a lot of formation and personnel shifts.

by phaze1 on Aug 15, 2011 2:42 PM EDT reply actions  

QB Situation

It’s entirely possible that when OBD drafted to secure their defense that they understood it would necessarily limit their ability to get a “franchise” QB and O-line. And, in keeping with their interest in managing expectations, having a valid Wildcat strategy to combat their lack of a “franchise” QB or high-end O-line was and is important to keep defenses honest until the players became proven or were replaced. (That’s not to say the players we now have won’t be long time or franchise players, but that they are still unproven). That said, it also seems like Gailey is developing the identity of the Bills office to suit his own notion of what modern NFL offenses need to evolve into given the types of offenses and player skills now being developed in college. If so, this may not be a temporary aberration, and the Bills will be on the cusp of the wave with Fitz being a prototypical new style QB.

Go big or go home.

by jackkemp15 on Aug 15, 2011 4:13 PM EDT reply actions  

I HATE THAT WORD

the “wildcat”… how is this a wildcat offense? this is a qb taking snaps, not a rb. this is chan’s own style that needs its own name. it is more similar to the ‘slash’ offense from his days in Pittsburgh. the wildcat is soo gaayyy

by BringBackGibran on Aug 15, 2011 5:45 PM EDT reply actions  

I hate the ChanKat offense.

It takes the starting QB out of the game. Gimmicky. Cheap.

This “scheme” is old hat now. Bellychunk and Rex will destroy it.
What are we going to roll out now?

The ol’ Fumbleruski?
The confused player looking to the sideline for a signal from his coach?
The pretend spike?
The statue of liberty? Really?

Why in the hell did we run it during preseason to allow the other teams to prepare for it?
WTF?! Surprise makes this works.

I really hope I eat crow for this comment. I hope it produces a few TDs this year and multiple 1st downs.
I just don’t like it.

YOU KIDS GIT OFFA MY LAWWN!

"There is not a loser in this room." Marv Levy.

by SERGEANT MAJOR THOR on Aug 15, 2011 7:41 PM EDT reply actions   2 recs

LOL.......BEST RANT OF THE PRESEASON......REC'D

QB SMASHER KING KONG JASPER
Dareus will put you on you Dar-e-ass

If you ask a question you don't want an answer to, expect an answer you don't want to hear.

by Joe P. on Aug 15, 2011 9:58 PM EDT up reply actions  

His jersey number got changed from 7 to 47, so Nesbitt is now a safety.

by Matt3511 on Aug 16, 2011 12:22 AM EDT reply actions  

where did you see this

just curious. i don’t disagree it could be the move, or even to list him as a RB… but ultimately, we still have time for that decision. i just didn’t see it on NFL or BB or really anywhere.

by ThaRealTruth on Aug 16, 2011 12:49 AM EDT up reply actions  

Nesbitt is not a QB

Anyone seen him play? He is a player though (as others said, very tough), which is why they may switch him to safety. My bet is he goes to the PS, works on his game as a safety, but he ultimately comes back as a “player”. He’ll play Wildcat, special teams, and occasionaly safety. He won’t very be a every down starting QB though.

I am sure he was one of Chan’s favorite players from GT.

by BillinNC on Aug 16, 2011 9:00 AM EDT reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

SB Nation's home for all things Buffalo Bills.
Community Guidelines :: Essential BR

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Bills_small
An Exploration of Ryan Fitzpatrick's TDs and INTs
Small
Beyond the Perfect Offseason: Where Do We Go From Here?
Dsc00843_small
NFL Divisional Record And Playoff Berth Correlation, 2002-2011

Recent FanPosts

Small
Who Will be the Number 2?
Spikes_small
Remaining Free Agents
04_buffalo_bills_football_coloring_at_coloring-pages-book-for-kids-boys_small
Mock 2012 Season
Small
The Return of the Running Back(s): Revisiting the Road to the Super Bowl
Small
Difference Between A "Franchise" QB and an "Elite" One
303857_872291743296_10504698_40499694_6362492_n_small
Be A Little Nicer Please, Bills Fans  :)
Cyclops1-12nd7cv_small
Current QB Wins
Small
The Count-Down to the Right Numbers
Bruuuuce_small
Ranking All 32 NFL Starting QB's : Who is ELITE?
Snapshot_20120113_small
Next Stop: 3rd Generation of Winners

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Screen_shot_2012-03-07_at_6 Brian Galliford

100_2488_small MattRichWarren

Authors

Range_march_2011_small Ron From NM

Slide1_small Der Jaeger

Moderators

Sucks_small Kurupt

Mrsinister03_small sireric

Cordy_small poz