Re-Assessing The Bills' Offensive Line Depth Chart
Buffalo Bills head coach Chan Gailey made it clear following his team's pre-season loss to the Chicago Bears that he wasn't pleased with the play of his depth players, particularly along the offensive line. Now, he's made a switch at left guard, promoting Chad Rinehart over Andy Levitre (if only for a day), and GM Buddy Nix has joined Gailey in commenting on the team's glaring lack of depth up front.
Given that things are being re-assessed up front by the team, I figured it was high time to do so here. There's a lot of confusion in the fan base regarding the Levitre demotion, and I figured I'd offer my own take as a starting point for hashing this thing out.
Gailey has also made it very clear that he was satisfied with the play of his first unit offensive line - including Levitre's play - in Chicago. That said, we're still going to lump the starters into this re-assessment to try to get a fuller understanding of the team's depth chart. Again, this is all guesswork, so bear that in mind.
Swing Tackles
We'll start at the crux of the team's line depth: players that the team views as options both inside at guard and outside at tackle. These are the players around which true line depth is built.
- Mansfield Wrotto: Signed to a two-year deal in March, prior to the lockout. Has more playing time in Gailey's offense than most of his depth peers. Has been the second-team right guard throughout training camp.
- Cordaro Howard: Also has playing time in Gailey's offense. Missed some camp time due to injury, and has seen time at both left and right tackle when healthy.
Offensive Tackles
The team's two starters at tackle, for better or worse, appear set. Figuring out the rest is a very difficult task, indeed.
- Demetrius Bell: Nobody's job in the front five is safer than Bell's - mostly because he's got no competition. The team desperately needs another 16 healthy games from him.
- Erik Pears: He's been the starting right tackle since Week 16 of the 2010 season, and that won't be changing any time soon. By year's end, Pears might be the least of our problems up front.
- Chris Hairston: It seems like the Bills will be going out of their way to keep Hairston off the field in 2011, as he's not remotely ready to play. They like him, however, and it's likely his roster spot is safe.
- Ed Wang: Technically, we could argue that Wang belongs in the swing tackle group, but as he's been the chief understudy of Bell all summer, we'll put him here instead. Wang has struggled, to put it mildly.
- Jason Watkins: An intriguing athlete, Watkins has never been able to ascend the team's depth chart. He's a huge longshot to make the team.
Guards and Centers
Obviously, this is where the most upheaval has occurred within the past 24 hours. We're not sure we're comfortable with the pecking order below, either, but we still think the logic is sound.
- Eric Wood: Aside from Bell, nobody's job is safer than Wood's. It's clear that Wood is the team's best lineman, and any lingering doubt as to where he'll line up this year is quickly subsiding. He's the center.
- Kraig Urbik: For whatever reason, Gailey hasn't seen fit to give Urbik a challenger yet. That means he's more satisfied with Urbik's play than Levitre's, right? Or, at least, he's higher on Urbik's upside.
- Andy Levitre: Rinehart hasn't taken Levitre's job yet, as evidenced by Levitre returning to the first unit Wednesday morning. Gailey said that he'll compete for a starting job, and thus far, Levitre's made more starts at the position this pre-season than Rinehart has.
- Chad Rinehart: The one reserve (to start camp) lineman that has proven to the coaching staff that he deserves consideration as a starter. His chances of making the team skyrocketed yesterday.
- Geoff Hangartner: It's been a quiet pre-season for Hangartner, who remains entrenched as the second-team center.
- Colin Brown: A longshot to make the roster.
- Isaiah Thompson: A longer shot to make the roster.
- Michael Switzer: A longer shot to make the roster.
Last year, the Bills had nine offensive linemen on the active roster to start the season. Pick nine, folks. It's not easy to do.
94 comments
|
2 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Bell, Pears, Hairston, Wrotto, Wood, Levitre, Rinehart, Hang, Urbik
If Rinehart take Levitre’s job, Levitre has been taking second team center reps and that could bump Hang off the roster in favor of a guy like Howard.
by MattRichWarren on Aug 17, 2011 10:14 AM EDT reply actions
I hope (beyond hope) that one of the swing tackles does not make it
I think the final group is exactly what you said, unfortunately. I would rather keep Hang and dump Wrotto, but that doesn’t seem likely as that would mean that we have no swing tackles at all.
"Slowly all the roles we act out become our identity. And in the end we are what we pretend to be." - Jerry Cantrell.
Its easy to do. Pears RT – Rinehart RG – Wood C – Levitre LG – Bell LT. there is the starting 5 with possibly wood moving to RG and Hang coming in to play Center again.
We also keep Urbik, Hairston and Wrotto. Done deal. Why do they make things so difficult at OBD??
by The Sweeglings on Aug 17, 2011 10:16 AM EDT reply actions
OR
Give Hang a shot at RG, i would understand this move taking place more so than replacing Levitre. Its not great but its not broke, so dont try to fix it. RG right now needs something more concrete, Urbik would make a good back up.
by The Sweeglings on Aug 17, 2011 10:19 AM EDT up reply actions
What Was It That Did Marv Levy Used To Say...
Sometimes having more choices means having no choice?
Go big or go home.
This is true. The Bills need to not be paying Kelsay 6 million a year, and could have shuffled that cash to a Tackle like Clabo. Then move Wood back to RG. Imagine the possibilities with those 2 on the right side. Spiller may actually have a productive year.
by The Sweeglings on Aug 17, 2011 10:24 AM EDT up reply actions
could have shuffled that cash to a Tackle like Clabo.
The Bills had plenty of cash they could have offered Clabo. I’m convinced he wasn’t leaving Atlanta, unless the Bills offered him an outrageous contract, which they could afford, given that they’re so far under the cap. But Nix didn’t think he was worth that.
"Slowly all the roles we act out become our identity. And in the end we are what we pretend to be." - Jerry Cantrell.
CLABO WAS NOT GOING TO LEAVE ATLANTA!!
But I hope we bring in some guys like Flozell, Stinchcomb from NO, etc to see how they look
that mentality is why the Bills routinely fail to get a guy they like in free agency
The same thing was said about Paul Posluszny – that POSLUSZNY IS NOT GOING TO LEAVE BUFFALO!!
But the Jaguars really wanted to upgrade their middle linebacker and made an offer to make it happen. If the Bills really wanted to upgrade at RT they could have.
Whether you want to overpay is a different issue but Clabo WOULD have left Atlanta if the Bills wanted him to.
The bandwagon will be full and fast and drunk and exciting - Undee
by poz on Aug 17, 2011 3:28 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Why would Clabo leave a contender to come play for the Bills?
Sorry, but now way CHIX would throw the kind of stupid money at Clabo that it would have taken to get him to play for the Bills. There is NO WAY Clabo was going to leave Atlanta for Buffalo. Poz leaving for the Jags was more of a lateral move team talent wise but to the 4-3 he says he wants to play in with the benefit of better weather in Florida.
QB SMASHER KING KONG JASPER
Dareus will put you on you Dar-e-ass
If you ask a question you don't want an answer to, expect an answer you don't want to hear.
Agreed. I don’t like the sentiment any more than you do, Poz, but he really wasn’t going to come here save for throwing him a ridiculous contract, which Nix is not prone to do (no Kelsay jokes, please).
"Slowly all the roles we act out become our identity. And in the end we are what we pretend to be." - Jerry Cantrell.
No
Kelsay jokes are warranted. This franchise has been subpar for way to many yrs. to just blame it on previous regimes. We throw money at Kelsay’s and chaff at signing legit talent for far to long! Do you think DJ and Nix are idiots? We’ve been subjected to a re-build that the builders of the pyrimiads would be upset with lack of results. Can we expect more of same ? Seems like it!
Baby steps are for babies. Step it up buffalo!
by buffalobacker on Aug 18, 2011 12:41 AM EDT up reply actions
Poz
Not a problem Nix was correct, let him go . Thats not problem, problem is we even thought Poz was worthwhile. Underachieving.
Baby steps are for babies. Step it up buffalo!
by buffalobacker on Aug 18, 2011 12:43 AM EDT up reply actions
any chance they keep 10 this year given the injury history?
by JustAskTheAxis on Aug 17, 2011 10:23 AM EDT reply actions
yes.
Never confuse movement with action.
~Ernest Hemingway
by NolaBillsFan on Aug 17, 2011 11:06 AM EDT up reply actions
Question
And it seems obvious to me, and many others. But if Gailey and Nix are concerned about the depth of the O-line, how come nothing has been done to address that depth?
Personally, there is nothing more annoying in life than a friend, co-worker, family member, etc. that constantly complains about things and never does anything about it.
by MarinoTheBill on Aug 17, 2011 10:31 AM EDT reply actions 4 recs
was it just gailey
or gailey and nix that expressed this concern. I thought it was just gailey
I’m really starting to take issue with these kinds of responses in regards to the Bills apparent weakness at OL. I agree that the position overall is severely lacking in talent and until it’s resolved the Bills are going to have a really hard time being consistently successful on offense. But people need to be patient and let the front office do it’s thing and stop being so negative about one thing that hasn’t been fixed when so many other problems have been addressed.
Buddy Nix is trying to rebuild this franchise into a winner. No easy task, given the horrible mess he was dealt. See MRW’s article cataloging all the draft busts we’ve been stuck with over the course of the last decade as proof. He cannot correct EVERYTHING that was wrong in one off season, it simply cannot be done. When Buddy took over, the Bills were weak everywhere! Except maybe for WR. To expect him to fix the run defense AND the pass rush AND the QB situation AND the weakness at OL AND add quality depth to the bench with one draft and one free agency period while being slowed by the lockout is simply unrealistic and IMO completely unfair.
It seems to me that the focus this year was to plug the holes on defense. Get better against the run, and have pass rushing capabilities. I think, at least on paper, this has largely been accomplished. Drafted Dareus, got Merriman healthy, dealt with losing Poz, etc. etc. We should see some serious improvement on defense this year. If my guess is correct, the next offseason will be dedicated to getting our QB of the future and beefing up the OLine. At that point, we will be primed to start contending for the division and\or making playoff runs.
Patience!
by The Adam Bomb on Aug 17, 2011 11:48 AM EDT up reply actions
I don't disagree
But everyone knew that depth on the O-line was a problem. If the Coach and GM both recognize that it is a problem, it would be nice to see some new faces for competition. This could be vets, additional UDFA’s, anything. And it isn’t being negative, its being realistic. It is a fact that both the coach and GM complained about the depth, and the only addition was a 4th round tackle.
by MarinoTheBill on Aug 17, 2011 11:55 AM EDT up reply actions
tunnel vision
You can sign players on both sides of the ball. Yes a big focus was on fixing the defense, but you can sign an o-line player as well. The Cardinals signed 50+ players in 5 days. There are players out there and I think most fans just want to hear that our front office is looking at them.
"Sit down and watch my Buffalo Bills destroy your Kingdome" - Abayarde
by nickdaniels on Aug 17, 2011 1:05 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
but they did address the o-line situation, just not the way the fans would of preferred.
They brought in Eric Pears, Kraig Urbik, Chad Reinhardt, Mansfield Wrotto and drafted Ed Wang and James Hairston. That is six somethings that they have done, now they are coaching them.
YOU ARE OUT of you kuku fufu mine craker laker Flaber baber FUNKI chunki brain. WE want to winn every year -- abayarde
The guy pretty much can’t win until we get into the playoffs. If he tells you the team has a hole, we flay him for not filling it. If doesn’t tell you, we complain that he doesn’t see it. There’s always some spot for improvement, can’t address them all at once. Nix is in a bind until we can show some results. Unfortunately with this schedule, he might be looking at another year.
Do we make too much of these guys quotes? I mean doesn’t every team have a hole in some way shape or form that their GM didn’t fix? I look at a lot other teams who have offensive line depth problems.
by greysquirrel on Aug 17, 2011 12:48 PM EDT up reply actions
A lot of teams have offensive line problems
Chicago, Pittsburgh are two that come to mind. It seems like there are not enough good players for that position.
I mean, there are maybe 10-15 GMs that are satisfied with their offensive line depth. Our problem is far from unique Cin, Den, Sea, Oak, Ari, Det, Ind, Was, SF…even the once great Min has a bunch of question marks.
by greysquirrel on Aug 17, 2011 1:29 PM EDT up reply actions
AND
now the Jets too. So it really cannot be so easy as just ‘fixing’ it.
by greysquirrel on Aug 17, 2011 2:41 PM EDT up reply actions
True
But they at least have capable, above average QB play, Jay and Ben.
Baby steps are for babies. Step it up buffalo!
by buffalobacker on Aug 17, 2011 4:23 PM EDT up reply actions
The point is its not so easy as ‘getting it done’. If anything, they stand to benefit more from overpaying a few guys because these teams seem to be closer to contending.
by greysquirrel on Aug 17, 2011 4:28 PM EDT up reply actions
But if Gailey and Nix are concerned about the depth of the O-line, how come nothing has been done to address that depth?
considering we’re not even remotely close to the only team with offensive line problems – even the good teams – Bears, Steelers, Packers have had sub par offensive lines – one could easily surmise that it’s just not an easy thing to do.
As a fan we can easily see a weakness and say why haven’t they upgraded it – well there are other issues on this team besides offensive line. A) You cannot fix all at once and B) you don’t want to take lesser talented players at other positions because of a need at another position.
by J2 on Aug 17, 2011 1:54 PM EDT up reply actions
Agreed.
The FA market for OL sucked. We went after the one monster and lost. The draft this year for OL was horrendous. I’m sure not too may UDFAs of any quality available, at least any kind of upgrade over the crap we have and have invested time and money in. I have vocally chastised them in the past but I have to admit, they are being wisely frugal. Teams are paying lesser talented players more than their worth this offseason. The scramble has been ridiculous. I think they’re just waiting until a draft or FA period where a true stud is available. I have to admit, they really did not pass on any elite talent for the OL this year at all. It was either off the board in the draft, or a castoff with high salary demands. Patience is a virtue, and no one ever said being virtuous was easy.
"I've never been a big numbers guy. Numbers are good for giving you numbers, but great QBs make the plays that keep drives alive, move chains and win games."
-Bill Cowher
Fix All At Once
I’ll assume you mean current regime, because the franchise has had sufficent time to assemble some talent somewhere at some postion of need. Its a shame this franchise has nothing to show for 15 yrs of rebuilding. Heres hoping Nix and Chan fair better at rebuilding than previous regimes not sure I’ll live long enough with this franchise!
Baby steps are for babies. Step it up buffalo!
by buffalobacker on Aug 17, 2011 4:28 PM EDT up reply actions
I see Hairston on the PS more than the actual roster.
I feel this way because the roster needs more depth not developmental players. Honestly, I feel Hairston will survive on the PS and if he doesn’t then someone will surface with more experience like someone else’s trash from thier PS.
YOU ARE OUT of you kuku fufu mine craker laker Flaber baber FUNKI chunki brain. WE want to winn every year -- abayarde
They’re not going to risk exposing a fourth-round pick to another team by putting him on the practice squad. They didn’t do it with a fifth-rounder last year (Wang), and they won’t do it with Hairston. Period.
Editor-in-Chief, BUFFALO RUMBLINGS®
@BrianGalliford
by Brian Galliford on Aug 17, 2011 10:35 AM EDT up reply actions
Then they must really feel this kid is going to be something.
He does have great size but boy is he raw, very raw. You are probably right, but I am thinking that he will not see much time in preseason and if he does get some time it will be blatantly obvious of the work he needs that other teams may just pass. Maybe I feel this way because of the lack of development of Ed Wang. If our weakness is depth of offensive lineman, than justifing Hariston to a roster spot is a gamble. He was a fourth round pick but was also, like the 15th tackle taken in the draft. I can’t see keeping him over Wrotto, Hangartner or Howard.
YOU ARE OUT of you kuku fufu mine craker laker Flaber baber FUNKI chunki brain. WE want to winn every year -- abayarde
Well if that true
Then they have to decide which of the three they keep Rinehart: , Wrotto, and Howard, There I believe comes the Rinehart experiment..
Bell, LeVetrie, Wood, Urbik and Pears is five.
Georgia Tech or not, Cordaro Howard is the player to keep on the roster and protect from losing. He will be #6. Rinehardt, Hangartner and Wrotto finish out the roster. If the Bills see someone they like before the season starts, then I think we lose Hangartner.
YOU ARE OUT of you kuku fufu mine craker laker Flaber baber FUNKI chunki brain. WE want to winn every year -- abayarde
Pick nine, folks.
I actually agree with the sentiment that they’ll keep ten, at the expense of (likely) a TE.
They needed a mess of players last year, and I don’t believe that Hang will be the odd man out going into the season.
Agreed
Any chance that because Brad Smith plays QB/WR/special teams that it frees up a roster spot so CHIX can keep an extra Olineman?
QB SMASHER KING KONG JASPER
Dareus will put you on you Dar-e-ass
If you ask a question you don't want an answer to, expect an answer you don't want to hear.
Others may disagree, but if anything I’d almost expect that to free up a roster spot for a fourth (or three-and-a-halfth) QB.
I think Levi is cut and Nesbitt is PS.
I really don’t see a 3rd. QB happening with Brad on the roster.
agreed...Smith is the 3rd QB....any chance he takes someones spot on special teams?
QB SMASHER KING KONG JASPER
Dareus will put you on you Dar-e-ass
If you ask a question you don't want an answer to, expect an answer you don't want to hear.
I wouldn't doubt Corto gets cut
QB SMASHER KING KONG JASPER
Dareus will put you on you Dar-e-ass
If you ask a question you don't want an answer to, expect an answer you don't want to hear.
Honestly I’d take Wang and Hairston.
Wrotto sucks and always will suck whilst Wang and Hairston suck (Wang much less this preseason) and have the potenetial to be alright.
What's going on??
Weeks away from the start of the season and they just now decide that the OL isn’t up to par!!! A little late now. Why aren’t they bringing anyone in to try out? Do you think they are given up on this year so they can get Luck? Could be
That's gotta be it. The Andrew Luck conspiracy. I hope declares soon, so we can really focus:)
YOU ARE OUT of you kuku fufu mine craker laker Flaber baber FUNKI chunki brain. WE want to winn every year -- abayarde
This is an attitude I hate. This kid has not played a single down in the nfl. Yet he is the savior of our franchise. He has just as much a chance to bust as anyone else we could draft. He can even stay another year after this one. So could matt bartkley if I’m not mistaken. It’s the depth their worried about. They think the starters are okay. The offensive line takes longer to gel then all other things. It takes a little patience specially in a short offseason like this one. I would like them to bring on stinchbomb for a workout though.
"This is a chance to shine some light on the city, They say it’s too cold. I’m going to bring some warmth to it." Marcell Dareus
by matthew62 on Aug 17, 2011 11:11 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
u better get used to it, it will not go away, trust me. I almost agree with you 100%.
Can’t agree with you totally, because I do think the kid will be good, but never good enough to suggest a conspiracy to get him.
YOU ARE OUT of you kuku fufu mine craker laker Flaber baber FUNKI chunki brain. WE want to winn every year -- abayarde
I remember they said the same thing about...
Brady Quinn and Matt Leinart. I also remember some people clamoring for Jimmy Clausen last year. There is no such thing as a sure thing, I wish people had enough long-term memory to keep that in mind. Luck may be the next Elway, but he might be the next Alex Smith, too.
Playing for a draft pick a full year away would be madness. Look at the last 20 drafts, and how many QBs were picked in the top 10, and how many of them were duds. I don’t know why people can’t keep just a tiny bit of perspective to see that. Not saying Luck will be good, but if you think he’s a sure thing, remember people thought the same thing about Quinn and Leinart too.
by williamherbert on Aug 17, 2011 12:37 PM EDT up reply actions
Starting:
Pears Rinehart Wood Levitre Bell
Reserves:
Urbik, Hangartner, Hairston and Wang
Yuck.
"Hey, the offensive linemen are the biggest guys on the field, they're bigger than everybody else, and that's what makes them the biggest guys on the field."
- John Madden
Better than if Howard or Wrotto appeared on that list anywhere…
"Slowly all the roles we act out become our identity. And in the end we are what we pretend to be." - Jerry Cantrell.
It's both easy and hard
Here’s the easy part: the starters will be Bell, Rinehart/Levitre, Wood, Urbik and Pears. That’s six players, with the loser of the Rinehart-Levitre-Urbik competition at OG still on the roster as a reserve. Also, Hairston will be on the roster, which gets us to seven.
The other two are harder to figure. They will come from a group of three possibilities: Wang, Wrotto and Howard. All three can play either OG or OT, with Wang more of an OT. The big question will be how much Wang has improved. Last year he looked simply awful, but I get the impression that that may have changed this year and he may be doing better. On the other hand, if they really thought there was a possibility that Wang might work out why would they have used a fourth-round pick on Hairston? These are not mouth-watering choices, to say the least, so it will depend on how these guys do over the next three weeks, with Chan Gailey picking the two who are least bad. There’s also the possibility that the Bills may avoid that choice by picking up someone off the waiver wire once teams start cutting down.
by Macktruck on Aug 17, 2011 10:59 AM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Wang is a left tackle prospect. Hairston is a right tackle prospect.
"This is a chance to shine some light on the city, They say it’s too cold. I’m going to bring some warmth to it." Marcell Dareus
by matthew62 on Aug 17, 2011 11:02 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Completely agree...
The main question with the “lack of depth” they have is with Wang, Howard, Wrotto where none of these guys are showing vast improvement where they are “pushing” the starters like Rhinehart is pushing Levitre. Those guys are “miles” behind Pears and Bell right now (who are not even considered “average tackles” by NFL standards. It is quite possible all maket the team or none of them make the team (if they got off their butts and signed some veterans to come in and compete). This then leads to their other main problem is signing veterans to come in an compete hasn’t proven effective for them either because it only takes about 3-4 games before these vets get hurt and then go on IR and we are back to just slotting guys into the position who are just “fill-ins”.
Hairston is safe for this year, but has the pressure on him next year to try and unseat Pears. Wang has all the pressure on him this year and needs to vastly improve during these preseason games to give the coaches enough confidence to see that he can continue this progress for the next year or two after.
Wang might work out why would they have used a fourth-round pick on Hairston?
because they want more than 3 tackles (bell, wang, pears) on the team? also they see wang as a LT prospect and they see hairston over on the right side.. i would think thats it at least
i also wouldnt discount a waiver wire addition making the team. other teams have better Olineman than us and may have to cut a decent one off the backend of their roster…
My 9
Bell, Wood, Pears, Levitre, Hang, whoever sucks the least these next 3 weeks x4.
I think all the backups mostly stink. In order of likelihood to stick, I’d go: Urbik, Rinehart, Howard, Wrotto, Hairston, Wang. If I ran the show, Wrotto and Wang would have no shot at the final roster.
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Aug 17, 2011 11:01 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
I agree with you on everything
except that if I was in charge, I’d want to keep Wang and let him and Hairston stick around over Wrotto and Howard.
The bandwagon will be full and fast and drunk and exciting - Undee
Yep
Don’t cut Wang. :(
Baby steps are for babies. Step it up buffalo!
by buffalobacker on Aug 17, 2011 4:30 PM EDT up reply actions
I miss Richie!
Richie Incognito was the type of guard I love, a mean SOB that only wants to hurt the guy in front of him. He’s been well behaved I think in Miami. I regretted to see him leave. I’m sure Chix would have never let him go!
Rebuilding a team properly takes time and patience
You are right, I completely forgot it was Nix’s first off season with the team. Well there is one strike against him. I think Incognito turned out pretty good in Miami. With strong coaching, his emotions can be controlled and he’s a dam good guard to have on your team.
Rebuilding a team properly takes time and patience
he was very good in Miami last year too
The bandwagon will be full and fast and drunk and exciting - Undee
Wood
Rinehart Pears
Levitre Urbik
Bell Stitchcomb
Wang Hairston
Question: if Hang worth anything if we tried to trade him?
great timing
darn good assessment
"Alright Men, lets go out there, bust um in the chops & get somebody bloody. If your not a superstar you best be sweating that ass off. Take the W in battle & make the Bills Nation Proud."
by Blood, sweat & Win on Aug 17, 2011 11:23 AM EDT reply actions
"not sure it can be fixed before the season starts"
Expectations and hope are always two playoff games in but when Buddy says something like this it is baffling when a guy like Stitchcomb is available. Barring some physical impairment isn’t he the present under the tree at this point? 26+ under cap? I would like to hear that he is at OBD getting looked at like a model at a car show.
I like the ‘idea’ of Stinchomb as much as the next guy. But I thought there WAS a physical impairment. It’s random, but better than nothing, this link has a guy who graded out the New Orleans line based on the first preseason game. Stinchomb came out dead last by a large margin. So it may be he is going to be a long time before he is 100%.
by greysquirrel on Aug 17, 2011 11:37 AM EDT up reply actions
I guess my point is I would like to hear they are making an effort to completely assess his possibilities by bringing him in. After that it is waiting for what crumbs come after cuts.
It’s hard for us to know if they explore the possibility. I’m not dismissing it, the Stinchomb I know is a solid player and a good lockerroom influence. But I googled a bit to see what the cute was about and this dampened my enthusiasm.
by greysquirrel on Aug 17, 2011 11:48 AM EDT up reply actions
Understood. Maybe he’s like SM and needs the proper time to heal. Depending on the deal that might be worth it given the state of decent OL’s on the grocery list.
True
If you can work something out and get comfortable with the nature of the injury, maybe you stash him on PUP and he provides long term RT or o-line depth.
by greysquirrel on Aug 17, 2011 12:12 PM EDT up reply actions
It's Too soon to Look For Replacements
Guys are in such a panic re: our offensive line (which outplayed Chicago’s – check the tape) they want Nix to go out and search for replacements NOW – even though teams still have 90 players on their rosters.
The Bills will sift thru the waiver wire when teams have to make final cuts to 53 players.
Get a grip guys!
Solid point. Though can we head off a “I don’t want another man’s trash” thread now? The prime prospects are gonzo.
by greysquirrel on Aug 17, 2011 1:32 PM EDT up reply actions
Your comments are similar to mine. If we decide to pick up players from waivers it should be at the end of pre-season when all teams are cutting the players that just miss being on their rosters, not the ones being cut anytime soon that are not worth spending their teams’ time on for the remainder of pre-season.
Year two is upon us.
by Buffalo for Eternity on Aug 17, 2011 1:38 PM EDT up reply actions
Though this guy might be interesting to replace Wrotto. Who I’ve not been enthused with.
by greysquirrel on Aug 17, 2011 5:31 PM EDT up reply actions
Like sands through an hourglass...
So our the days of lives…
The score dictated they pass
by norcaliangelsfan on Aug 17, 2011 1:57 PM EDT reply actions
well I totally screwed that up.....
So ARE the days of our lives…..
The score dictated they pass
by norcaliangelsfan on Aug 17, 2011 1:58 PM EDT up reply actions

by 
































