Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Following UFC 146 Loss, Jason 'Mayhem' Miller 'Done' in UFC

Poll: Should Buffalo Bills Open Competition At Right Guard?

If Buffalo Bills head coach Chan Gailey is to be believed, the left guard competition he opened up between Andy Levitre and challenger Chad Rinehart last week is over - unless, of course, Levitre can beat out Demetrius Bell to be the team's starting left tackle. He admitted as much to reporters earlier this week: if Bell sticks at left tackle, Levitre will start at left guard.

That's a rather quick exit for Rinehart and his chances at earning a starting gig, at least on the surface. Unless, of course, Gailey has toyed with the idea of letting Rinehart try to unseat Kraig Urbik at right guard.

Gailey will be letting Rinehart split reps with Levitre at left guard this Saturday against Jacksonville merely to allow Levitre to take reps at left tackle. It would be pretty easy to slip Rinehart in at right guard while Bell and Levitre man the left side, allowing Rinehart to compete for Urbik's spot (and possibly to let Urbik take some emergency center reps later in the game).

It's just our opinion, but Urbik's play has been lacking, so you know where our vote lies. Now we're asking for your opinion.

Poll
Now that he appears out of the running at LG, should Chad Rinehart be given a chance to unseat Kraig Urbik at RG?
Yes
1511 votes
No
57 votes
Undecided
52 votes

1620 votes | Poll has closed

Comment 122 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

If they're going to have a competition for LT

I don’t know why they wouldn’t have one for an equally weak and unsettle position at RG. It doesn’t really make sense that they wouldn’t let Rinehart duke it out with Urbik; let the least craptastic win.

~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."

by Kurupt on Aug 25, 2011 10:23 AM EDT reply actions  

Given that Levitre might be the LT and Rhinehart the LG, its a cluter f* to at the same time consider Rhinehart at RG. Too many moving pieces makes line swaps impossible to evaluate. Urbik played a lot better at RG than Bell did at LT in Denver. It’s also a less critical position. So straighten out what they want to do at LT. If they keep Bell, then consider Rhinehart on the right side.

by greysquirrel on Aug 25, 2011 10:40 AM EDT up reply actions  

At the same time

What’s one more moving part? If Bell at LT and Rinehart at RG is better than Levitre at LT, why not? Why should Urbik get a free pass to starting and why isn’t Hang given a chance to win the RG job? It seems ridiculous to just give Urbik the job with no competition….

~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."

by Kurupt on Aug 25, 2011 10:57 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions  

Hey, I’m not arguing anyone should get a free pass. I think every one of these guys is in competition, whether we perceive it or not. If Urbik is playing poorly once the left-side is settled, by all means, start trying Rhinehart or Hang in there.

by greysquirrel on Aug 25, 2011 11:12 AM EDT up reply actions  

Um, yes. What harm will it really do? And it could do some good for both of them.

"...and dance by the light of the moon!"

by bflogrl on Aug 25, 2011 10:24 AM EDT reply actions  

How about an open competition at every position along the o-line? I feel like the bills aren’t doing enough to find out who the “best 5 guys” are.

by bizarro bills on Aug 25, 2011 10:26 AM EDT via mobile reply actions   2 recs

rec'd

Cannot agree more with this statement!

"Sit down and watch my Buffalo Bills destroy your Kingdome" - Abayarde

by nickdaniels on Aug 25, 2011 11:27 AM EDT up reply actions  

Whatever

the coach feels best at this point; you’d have to have good inside info to determine exactly what they are doing up front, so at this point prob best to leave it in the hands on experts.

I, unlike many do like trying Levitre at LT as I think he is about the best they have. I wouldnt pull the RG yet as LT is the immediate issue.

Do need more out of Buddy & where the heck is Whaley anyways? Good job adapting to the ILB situation but, uh, cant find the coach some help?

"Alright Men, lets go out there, bust um in the chops & get somebody bloody. Keep working till you get it right. Take the W in battle & make the Bills Nation Proud."

by Blood, sweat & Win on Aug 25, 2011 10:26 AM EDT reply actions   1 recs

Exactly right. Let the coaches do their job.

But Nix has to do more to get quality players in the mix. That has been a major failure.

by Rick A on Aug 25, 2011 10:29 AM EDT up reply actions  

Nah

not a major failure, just too slow for most of us. Going in the right direction.

Prob should keep in mind they have to sell to get players to come here where as any player would have come when Kelly was here as they knew they’d be winners.

But there are other teams in transition that seemly should have a serviceable lineman or two that clashes w/new admin. This is where I thought best chance to land an ot.

"Alright Men, lets go out there, bust um in the chops & get somebody bloody. Keep working till you get it right. Take the W in battle & make the Bills Nation Proud."

by Blood, sweat & Win on Aug 25, 2011 12:53 PM EDT up reply actions  

Rec'd

One position at a time. Switch one guy at a time and if LT is their primary concern do that first. I keep asking, but the line experts haven’t told me Urbik actually looks bad. Hasn’t the right side in general been decent? It’s just conventional wisdom around here based on the one obvious play from the first preseason game. Technically they are all in competition, even if they aren’t moving in and out of the first unit.

by greysquirrel on Aug 25, 2011 10:29 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think

the play of LT has taken all the spotlight, as it was so bad at times it was almost comical. (yes he was left on an island w/no help, but…). The right side was not as bad, I thought Pears was actually the most consistent to this point. People may be calling the RG spot as Hang has alot of support, (perhaps rightfully so?) & Urbik is so big he looks slow?

"Alright Men, lets go out there, bust um in the chops & get somebody bloody. Keep working till you get it right. Take the W in battle & make the Bills Nation Proud."

by Blood, sweat & Win on Aug 25, 2011 10:46 AM EDT up reply actions  

Yeah

This seems right to me. Levitre-Hang-Wood were solid inside. I don’t see a better inside combo than that.

by silvermike on Aug 25, 2011 10:36 AM EDT up reply actions  

Because that would be one of the worst moves you could make. I know it’s been gone over repeatedly but the only way that makes sense is if it immediately makes the Bills a playoff team which it doesn’t. Wood has always been the long term plan for center and this is the year he makes the transition. Moving him back to guard is counter productive, doesn’t improve the line that much, and does nothing to improve the long term viability of the line. If you don’t like Urbik as RG (which is understandable) it would make infinitely more sense to put Hang there, were he is also quite comfortable, without undermining the progress of out future center.

Hang doesn’t fit with the long term vision the coaches have for the OL and the center is the heart and mind of the line in every way. Putting Hang there just delays development for no real reward. I like Hang and think he is a great lineman but some fans need to look to the future more than the past.

by Lifyre on Aug 25, 2011 11:21 AM EDT up reply actions  

yeah or at least

punt Hangartner at RG. He’s better than Urbik and Rienhart

by Fernando brazil on Aug 25, 2011 11:26 AM EDT up reply actions  

how do you know this?

i would have to disagree on the basis that he is not getting any chances there.

It is easy to think it would work, but you have to trust the coaches on the field.

"The Buffalo Bills have just exploded all over the Cincinnati Bangles"
-Steve Tasker-

by billsoferie on Aug 25, 2011 12:37 PM EDT up reply actions  

that's

the best line for our team now. Bell-Levitre-Hangartner-Wood-Pears.

by Fernando brazil on Aug 25, 2011 11:25 AM EDT up reply actions  

no

Bell-Levitre-Wood-Rienhart-Pears

"The Buffalo Bills have just exploded all over the Cincinnati Bangles"
-Steve Tasker-

by billsoferie on Aug 25, 2011 12:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

The team is coming off of a 4-12 season… Every position should be up for grabs.

"It’s like I’ve always said, don’t tell me about the labor pains, just show me the baby."
- Buddy Nix

"How can a guy with a name like Melo be such a pain in the ass?"
- George Lopez

by dnvrBillsfan on Aug 25, 2011 10:28 AM EDT reply actions  

It should be a 3way.

Rine, Urbik and Hang.

Now attending the Univ. of Hockey.

by bflo on Aug 25, 2011 10:29 AM EDT reply actions  

TWSS

"...You play to win the game. Hello? You play to win the game. You don't play it to just play it. That's the great thing about sports: you play to win, and I don't care if you don't have any wins. You go play to win. When you start tellin' me it doesn't matter, then retire. Get out! 'Cause it matters." ~ Herm Edwards

"Talk's cheap. We all know that. It's like I've always said: 'Don't tell me about the labor pains, just show me the baby.' " ~ Buddy Nix

by Jason from OH-IO on Aug 25, 2011 10:31 AM EDT up reply actions  

Nix/Gailey

I am really frustrated with the incestuous way that Nix and Gailey manage their personnel.

Clearly the reason Rhinehart was allowed to compete for a spot at LG (Levitre) was that it wasn’t Nix’s guy and furthermore the same rationale plays out with LT (Bell) possibly being replaced by Levitre.

For these same reasons, Nix seems to be protecting the guys that he touted as “answers” last year in Pears and Urbik. Also, same rationale why Hang is probably not getting a legitimate shot. Let’s not forget how well he played at center, I know we are all infatuated with Woods.

"...You play to win the game. Hello? You play to win the game. You don't play it to just play it. That's the great thing about sports: you play to win, and I don't care if you don't have any wins. You go play to win. When you start tellin' me it doesn't matter, then retire. Get out! 'Cause it matters." ~ Herm Edwards

"Talk's cheap. We all know that. It's like I've always said: 'Don't tell me about the labor pains, just show me the baby.' " ~ Buddy Nix

by Jason from OH-IO on Aug 25, 2011 10:31 AM EDT reply actions   2 recs

Clearly the reason Rhinehart was allowed to compete for a spot at LG (Levitre) was that it wasn’t Nix’s guy and furthermore the same rationale plays out with LT (Bell) possibly being replaced by Levitre.

I don’t think its clear. Particularly because the logic is contradictory.

by greysquirrel on Aug 25, 2011 10:33 AM EDT up reply actions  

How

CLEARLY – Nix is willing to tinker with guys that were from the previous regime (Levitre, Bell, Hang), while providing protection to guys that he picked up (Pears and Urbic), not to mention extending the contract of the amazing worthless Wrotto.

Where has he mentioned that Hangartner has had an opportunity to grab a starting spot? He DESERVES it.

"...You play to win the game. Hello? You play to win the game. You don't play it to just play it. That's the great thing about sports: you play to win, and I don't care if you don't have any wins. You go play to win. When you start tellin' me it doesn't matter, then retire. Get out! 'Cause it matters." ~ Herm Edwards

"Talk's cheap. We all know that. It's like I've always said: 'Don't tell me about the labor pains, just show me the baby.' " ~ Buddy Nix

by Jason from OH-IO on Aug 25, 2011 10:40 AM EDT up reply actions  

Chan and Buddy are trying to build a line that doesn’t get pushed around – Nix has been forthright in saying that he wants his team to get bigger and stronger.

Both Levitre and Hangartner have issues with power and strength – that’s not their game so they don’t fit into what the Bills are trying to do. Maybe one of them can still hang on but I see both of them as reserve options for what the Bills want to do.

Not sure why you bring Pears into this discussion as he’s easily, easily been the most consistent and best performer along the offensive line this preseason – Eric Wood included.

Most of Urbiks issues have been mental lapses and he got blown up twice all preseason – he needs more time to jell as he’s let a few stunts get through because as i’m assuming he didn’t recognize that was his responsibility until it was too late.

I voted no after watching our starters multiple times on both preseason games – he needs more time to work with Pears and Wood but he’s strong and rarely gets pushed back.

by J2 on Aug 25, 2011 10:56 AM EDT up reply actions  

J2 a constant film watcher I love it

But you have to admit Urbik’s feet are slow aswell.

When he gets in open space he looks kinda lost do you not agree?

Perfect example, TE screen to Scott Chandler against Denver.

When you watch it, watch how Chandler almost runs into Urbik and because of it almost gets tackled from behind and eventually does get tackled from behind. If Urbik was a bit quicker Chandler has a bit more space and probably would have been able to pick up 15 instead of 8. i know this is merley one play but ti’s the little things when it comes to OL and you know this.

"Big Gulps Eh, Well See ya later" - Lloyd Christmas
" You Gus ready To Let The Dogs Out" "What?" " you Know, Who Let the dogs out rough rough rogh rough" - Zack Galifinakis - The Hangover

by PaullyPforPrez on Aug 25, 2011 11:03 AM EDT up reply actions  

I would agree with this – yes.

I’m also surprised by the lack of slack that Eric Woods been getting – he hasn’t been lighting up the preseason by any stretch of the imagination yet he seems to get a pass here….

by J2 on Aug 25, 2011 11:11 AM EDT up reply actions  

I think he gets a pass based on prior achievments

It’s like the 55 year old guy at woprk he doesn’t get alot of the ideas and stuff but he still gets praised for whats he’s done not what he’s doing hahahaha.

We have to remember Wood is gettin Acclimated to being a C again. He was a guard for 2 years + the fact he had major surgery to his knee. That has to effect the way you used to do things and the way you do things now.

The thing i feel gailey loves about Wood is his demeanor in his blocking, he refuses to get pushed around, and if he does get pushed around on a play he’s trying that much harder on the next play to not get pushed around.

Like I have said twice already I firmly believe we will have a very different OL come October then what we have now. Justa hunch.

"Big Gulps Eh, Well See ya later" - Lloyd Christmas
" You Gus ready To Let The Dogs Out" "What?" " you Know, Who Let the dogs out rough rough rogh rough" - Zack Galifinakis - The Hangover

by PaullyPforPrez on Aug 25, 2011 11:16 AM EDT up reply actions  

Easy young man
It’s like the 55 year old guy at woprk he doesn’t get alot of the ideas and stuff but he still gets praised for whats he’s done not what he’s doing hahahaha.

There are still many of us 55 and older that can run circles around the younger generation!!

.

"Only in a rock and roll band can someone like Keith Richards perceive himself as the responsible one."

-- Malcolm Gladwell

by Goose22 on Aug 25, 2011 11:31 AM EDT up reply actions   3 recs

rec’d.

“BIG” circles!

Y'all- There's a "D" in rebuild, but no "O"- The gospel according to Buddy Nix 4:12

by fansince60 on Aug 25, 2011 11:32 AM EDT up reply actions  

Haha, turning radius isn’t what it used to be?

"Slowly all the roles we act out become our identity. And in the end we are what we pretend to be." - Jerry Cantrell.

by stetzwebs on Aug 25, 2011 11:34 AM EDT up reply actions  

I didn’t mean it that way, but, I can see how you got that.

Y'all- There's a "D" in rebuild, but no "O"- The gospel according to Buddy Nix 4:12

by fansince60 on Aug 25, 2011 11:37 AM EDT up reply actions  

"BIG" circles!

Like a Nascar race…

"Only in a rock and roll band can someone like Keith Richards perceive himself as the responsible one."

-- Malcolm Gladwell

by Goose22 on Aug 25, 2011 2:32 PM EDT up reply actions  

Sounds like a big dose of

“Get off my lawn!” to me…

I kid I kid. Being a younger fellow with a few years working I have a healthy respect for those that have been around a while, that experience is priceless especially for those of us who like getting better at our job every day.

by Lifyre on Aug 25, 2011 11:34 AM EDT up reply actions  

Hey no disrespect at all

Just simply an analogy.

Sorry if I offended anyone, did not mean to at all.

"Big Gulps Eh, Well See ya later" - Lloyd Christmas
" You Gus ready To Let The Dogs Out" "What?" " you Know, Who Let the dogs out rough rough rogh rough" - Zack Galifinakis - The Hangover

by PaullyPforPrez on Aug 25, 2011 11:55 AM EDT up reply actions  

definately a sore spot

especially if you look at it from the other side, as if the younger generation is well let’s just say the younger generation is our future. One that hangs billboards, vandalize lawns, this player sucks, this guy shouldn’t get paid this much etc…….. I have learned that in life everyone has a role, whether we agree on things or not, everyone has a strength and everyone has a weakness, it is putting it all together and working for the common goal that is the challenge.

YOU ARE OUT of you kuku fufu mine craker laker Flaber baber FUNKI chunki brain. WE want to winn every year -- abayarde

by VanScottM on Aug 25, 2011 12:16 PM EDT up reply actions   1 recs

Well Put VanScott, as always

"Big Gulps Eh, Well See ya later" - Lloyd Christmas
" You Gus ready To Let The Dogs Out" "What?" " you Know, Who Let the dogs out rough rough rogh rough" - Zack Galifinakis - The Hangover

by PaullyPforPrez on Aug 25, 2011 12:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

everyone has a strength and everyone has a weakness, it is putting it all together and working for the common goal that is the challenge.

As a business owner and as former jock in my younger days I whole heartly agree!!

Rec’d

"Only in a rock and roll band can someone like Keith Richards perceive himself as the responsible one."

-- Malcolm Gladwell

by Goose22 on Aug 25, 2011 3:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well said – rec’d from one of the older guys.

Year two is upon us.

by Buffalo for Eternity on Aug 25, 2011 7:16 PM EDT up reply actions  

No offense taken

I still have a hard time believing that I hit my mid 50’s…

"Only in a rock and roll band can someone like Keith Richards perceive himself as the responsible one."

-- Malcolm Gladwell

by Goose22 on Aug 25, 2011 1:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

Not sure why you bring Pears into this discussion as he’s easily, easily been the most consistent and best performer along the offensive line this preseason – Eric Wood included.

I cant really sign off on that J2. Eric Pears has not been consistent. Nobody has, no need to label one guy the best performer just to do so. Pears has not been very good.

This even grates my passive cheese - LeClaire Bill

by poz on Aug 25, 2011 12:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

Thanks for saving me time Poz… As K put it earlier… least “craptastic” players should win. Furthermore I don’t think anyone has played enough this preseason to make that statement.

"...You play to win the game. Hello? You play to win the game. You don't play it to just play it. That's the great thing about sports: you play to win, and I don't care if you don't have any wins. You go play to win. When you start tellin' me it doesn't matter, then retire. Get out! 'Cause it matters." ~ Herm Edwards

"Talk's cheap. We all know that. It's like I've always said: 'Don't tell me about the labor pains, just show me the baby.' " ~ Buddy Nix

by Jason from OH-IO on Aug 25, 2011 12:25 PM EDT up reply actions  

Furthermore I don’t think anyone has played enough this preseason to make that statement.

well a) shouldn’t that pertain to the players that you’ve blasted then?

and b) maybe you should talk about something that you know about – because clearly you have no idea how well Pears has played.

by J2 on Aug 25, 2011 12:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

Pears

Are you really saying Pears has played well? Really?

"...You play to win the game. Hello? You play to win the game. You don't play it to just play it. That's the great thing about sports: you play to win, and I don't care if you don't have any wins. You go play to win. When you start tellin' me it doesn't matter, then retire. Get out! 'Cause it matters." ~ Herm Edwards

"Talk's cheap. We all know that. It's like I've always said: 'Don't tell me about the labor pains, just show me the baby.' " ~ Buddy Nix

by Jason from OH-IO on Aug 25, 2011 5:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

Are you really saying Pears has played well? Really?

anyone that has watched him would say yes – how could I not? he has

by J2 on Aug 25, 2011 6:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

Have to agree

I’ve been focusing on Urbik, Bell and Rinehart when I go back to do my play by play re-watch. Pears has looked pretty solid, nothing special, but solid.

I’ve seen Wood have more misses than Pears so far during this small pre-season sample size.

by lonestar_ak on Aug 25, 2011 9:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

well i went back just now and rewatched the first two drives

and pears on first play, cut block on right side, during run left. acceptable, nothing to rave about.

second play, he manages to block air, while rush forces fitz to run right, where he was open to block air again

third play, he mauls the defender who is spinning, and basically gets away with a hold because he tries to pancake, but the defender is too low, and he can’t spin all the way because pears has his head.

fake punt.

next play pears successfully blocks von miller. of course he does have 5 inches and 50 lbs on him.

luckily next play is screen, as he is left to block 3 guys, and only gets miller again.

next play, fitz drilled by free rusher left by pears.

next play, another screen, he chips his guy at line, moves to space and chandler is tackled from behind.

fred’s run left- pears does nothing, as his guy head down the line, and pears would need to hold to accomplish anything. Wash.

incomplete pass- pears manages to block #26. might have had a size advantage there too.

blitz, pears gets hands on one of 3 defenders coming through- his best play as he at least gets 1 guy, as chandler barely chips a defender, and urbik lets another blow by.

all in all, not solid. passable. acceptable, sorta. feeble and unimpressive is more like it to me. just because he had 2 good blocks on a LB/CB respectively, and can move out on 2 screens and hit nobody doesn’t excuse letting defenders run free. if not for strong pass protection by fred, 2 more would be sacks occur from right side of line, manned by urbik and pears. and both those pressures were outside the tackle. just saying.

then

by ThaRealTruth on Aug 25, 2011 11:36 PM EDT up reply actions  

and those pressures were also Freds responsibility. You seem to be thinking Pears isn’t good because he has a size advantage pn guys?? we’ll talk later

by J2 on Aug 26, 2011 8:16 AM EDT up reply actions  

i am thinking he has a disadvantage from size

not an advantage… in that leverage is easier to obtain the lower you are, and he has difficulty getting low… he is a mauler for sure, he can definitely be a good edge guy, but can be and is are not the same.

by ThaRealTruth on Aug 26, 2011 4:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

i would agree if he didn't leave the edge pass rusher to be fred's responsibility

taking on a LB maybe… a CB or Safety… sure.. but i don’t want my 210 pound RB taking on a 300 pound guy… especially if he is your starter. it happens i realize, but it isn’t the preference. problem to me was being in spread and fitz not checking to run… maybe due to limited play calling, maybe confidence he would get the pass off…. regardless, not the best situation. gotta put it on someone.

by ThaRealTruth on Aug 26, 2011 4:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

I would also say he has

He’s been competent and borderline pretty good.

~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."

by Kurupt on Aug 26, 2011 2:18 AM EDT up reply actions  

right – and that’s all i’m saying. Right now i’m comfortable with him going into the season which is something I haven’t been able to say in a long time over there – FWIW

by J2 on Aug 26, 2011 8:17 AM EDT up reply actions  

Pears has not been very good.

honestly Poz – I don’t know what you’re watching. In the Bronco’s game he had 1 bad play at 5:38 in which Von Miller beat him but the ball was already gone. He was excellent in pass protection other than that one play and the Bills biggest and best runs of the night were behind both Urbik and Pears.

Pears has been very good so far and i’m excited – I have no idea how you could come to the conclusion that he’s not good – that makes no sense.

by J2 on Aug 25, 2011 12:55 PM EDT up reply actions  

that makes no sense.

In the Broncos game he had a few plays where he looked over-matched and then in the Bears game I think the film shows him repeatedly being pushed around by defenders.

I did not say Pears is “not good”, I said he hasnt been very good up to this point. Dont let excitement over what he could be takeaway from the fact that he has been beaten cleanly this preseason, I think especially in the running game.

This even grates my passive cheese - LeClaire Bill

by poz on Aug 25, 2011 1:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

In the Broncos game he had a few plays where he looked over-matched and then in the Bears game I think the film shows him repeatedly being pushed around by defenders.

not the case even once. In the Bears game in the 1st quarter at the 7:46 mark he ran blocked and the defender pushed down the line and made the tackle other than that he was excellent in both the run and pass.

I have no idea how you could come to the conclusion that he was over matched – that simply is not the case and hasn’t been save for the the 1 play that Von Miller beat him on. Pears is good

by J2 on Aug 25, 2011 1:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

not the case even once

Not even once in the Bronco game? (unable to maintain his block on a CJ Spiller run to the left in the first quarter, on the 3rd down that ended our first drive Pears was out of position in pass protect, in the second quarter I thought he may have been getting away with holding because he could not stop his man, about 6 minutes left in the half he got blown by on pass pro, third down with about 5.5 min left in half Pears gets burned in pass pro but Fitz’ quick release gets rid of it, on the very next run play Pears’ man throws him off and makes the tackle on CJ for no gain, even on plays where it didnt have an impact on the play – big run at end of half – he looked overmatched against speed)

Again, Im not saying Pears has played poorly. All I said was that he hasnt been very good. Has he had his moments? You bet. For spans in the Bronco game Pears showed the ability to seal his edge and to get defenders out of the play but when Pears has had to deal with speed or hold his block while moving laterally I think his footwork gets exposed.

Of course Pears hasnt played as poorly as Demetrius Bell, I of all people know this, but I dont think its fair to say he is good. I dont think anyone on the offensive line deserves that. I also dont think its fair to say he didnt have one poor play in preseason

This even grates my passive cheese - LeClaire Bill

by poz on Aug 25, 2011 2:01 PM EDT up reply actions  

unable to maintain his block on a CJ Spiller run to the left in the first quarter

not sure what run – he pancaked a guy on Spillers run to the left I just watched.

on the 3rd down that ended our first drive Pears was out of position in pass protect,

no he wasn’t – his man went down the line and he went with him and Jackson picked up the Bitzer then Pears came back around to get the guy on the stunt but Fitz was already being wrapped up.

about 6 minutes left in the half he got blown by on pass pro, third down with about 5.5 min left in half Pears gets burned in pass pro but Fitz’ quick release gets rid of it

This was the play I already mentioned and his only bad play of the game.

All I said was that he hasnt been very good.

I know you’re saying that – and i’m telling you you’re wrong.

I also dont think its fair to say he didnt have one poor play in preseason

If you read my comments I specifically point out the only plays in which he had bad plays – went I said:

I have no idea how you could come to the conclusion that he was over matched

I meant to say that other than the plays I pointed out – so sorry for the omission there and not being thorough.

Pears has been our best and most consistent offensive linemen thus far in the preseason plain and simple

by J2 on Aug 25, 2011 2:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

and i’m telling you you’re wrong.

You can tell me that all you want but I think its odd to hear you speak with such finality based on what you are seeing from two halves of play. Obviously, I do not agree.

Again, I return to what I said in my original response:

I cant really sign off on that J2. Eric Pears has not been consistent. Nobody has

As I implied in my original comment, Pears has some good plays and some poor plays if you do not see the poor ones than you don’t see them. But I do not think I’m wrong that he has been inconsistent.

This even grates my passive cheese - LeClaire Bill

by poz on Aug 25, 2011 2:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

I laid out to you his poor plays which included a whopping 2 plays in 3 quarters that didn’t result in any negative plays for the Bills.

Maybe your definition of inconsistent for offensive linemen and mine are different because there are only maybe 5 guys in the entire NFL that doesn’t have some bad plays in a game and maybe even none.

I feel 100% correct in my assessment and wouldn’t be giving Pears props unless he deserved them. We have the best tackle play that i’ve seen in years so far, sure it’s the preseason and only 2 games but the fact of the matter is that he’s playing the better football than anyone on our line and is a good consistent tackle for us at this point.

I’d love to get someone elses opinion on this – Ron, Brian anyone who’s paid specific attention to Pears through the course of the past 2 games. With a DVR it takes maybe 20-30 minutes to go through the plays. I’d really like a 3rd opinion on this

by J2 on Aug 25, 2011 2:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

I laid out to you his poor plays

And I laid out to you mine.

We have the best tackle play that i’ve seen in years so far

What exactly does that mean? The rotating door of Scott, Chambers, Bell, Wrotto, Howard, Green was worse over the years? Hell, I’d hope so.

Again, Im not saying Pears is going to be a bad football player, Im just surprised to hear you speaking in “Pears is good” terms after two regular season games and three quarters of preseason games is all.

This even grates my passive cheese - LeClaire Bill

by poz on Aug 25, 2011 3:06 PM EDT up reply actions  

and again, one more time

Pears has looked good this preseason but he has suffered from inconsistency like everyone else on the line. I really dont agree hes been consistent

This even grates my passive cheese - LeClaire Bill

by poz on Aug 25, 2011 3:07 PM EDT up reply actions  

You are being kind

Pears has not looked “good” this preseason, maybe average. As you have pointed out he has had some good plays, but has been overpowered and not consistend on others.

J2 has a serious man-crush on Pears for some reason.

"...You play to win the game. Hello? You play to win the game. You don't play it to just play it. That's the great thing about sports: you play to win, and I don't care if you don't have any wins. You go play to win. When you start tellin' me it doesn't matter, then retire. Get out! 'Cause it matters." ~ Herm Edwards

"Talk's cheap. We all know that. It's like I've always said: 'Don't tell me about the labor pains, just show me the baby.' " ~ Buddy Nix

by Jason from OH-IO on Aug 25, 2011 5:39 PM EDT up reply actions  

J2 has a serious man-crush on Pears for some reason.

ya – because he doesn’t suck. You obviously haven’t watched the guy out there – not sure why you’re even chiming in at this point

by J2 on Aug 25, 2011 6:20 PM EDT up reply actions  

come on.

he stands up on most every snap. he has not had a perfect preseason… and even if he has in your eyes… it is the preseason and we have seen him compete against 2 teams sorta… kinda early to name him competent.. IMO.

by ThaRealTruth on Aug 25, 2011 6:22 PM EDT up reply actions  

but he does have good reach

which helps him compensate for being too upright.

by ThaRealTruth on Aug 25, 2011 6:31 PM EDT up reply actions  

kinda early to name him competen

as it pertains to the preseason which I thought I made clear from the beginning. I never said he’s going to be awesome I am simply making the point that up till this point in the preseason he’s played the best on the line.

I also pointed out plays in which he sucked which were few and far between. I’m home all day tomorrow if you wanna come over and watch him with me….

by J2 on Aug 25, 2011 6:38 PM EDT up reply actions  

idk if i can sit through that game a 4th time

trev and i watched it on sunday, and i cruised through it again yesterday… all in all i just saw a lot of mess.

i just feel like when he ends up with a speed rusher with SOME power against him, he is done for because he will either hold, or get beat.

by ThaRealTruth on Aug 25, 2011 7:15 PM EDT up reply actions  

idk if i can sit through that game a 4th time

it seriously takes 20 minutes to go through both games DVR style – they only play like 5 minutes in the first game and 10 in the 2nd.

i just feel like when he ends up with a speed rusher with SOME power against him, he is done for because he will either hold, or get beat.

I didn’t see that at all – i’m ready when you are!

by J2 on Aug 25, 2011 7:19 PM EDT up reply actions  

Get ’em J2.

Year two is upon us.

by Buffalo for Eternity on Aug 25, 2011 7:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

lol – it’s not about that – it’s about the fact that i’ve watched our entire starting offensive line going back and forth with my DVR like 5 times at this point. I know what I saw and I know how those guys played.

At this point the guys that Buddy brought in have outplayed Bell, Levitre and even Wood. Wood has had a bunch of blown assignments and has gotten beaten a few times yet you wouldn’t see that here – it’s all peaches and roses with him for some reason.

by J2 on Aug 25, 2011 7:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

Hey I’m with you.

I thought Pears did better than his linemates.

Year two is upon us.

by Buffalo for Eternity on Aug 25, 2011 7:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

At this point the guys that Buddy brought in

well – the starting guys :)

some of the other guys have been awful

by J2 on Aug 25, 2011 7:29 PM EDT up reply actions  

Well, apparently the coaches don’t think Wood is terrible. They gave him the C job outright and haven’t brought in anyone to challenge him.

Give a monkey a typewriter and infinite time, and he’ll eventually release Maybin. -- stetzwebs
Unfortunately, experience doesn't always lead to wisdom - Joe P.

by thefourwinds on Aug 25, 2011 7:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

but he is right: wood has missed a number of assignments

but that could be just a sign that he is compensating for Urbik… though i really can’t know without knowing the actual blocking assignments on each play since we run so much zone…

by ThaRealTruth on Aug 25, 2011 8:03 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’m just saying that if Wood has been that bad but the coaches haven’t put his job up to competition, then it can’t just be that they want “their” guys. They may be deciding based strictly on measurables (which can certainly get you into trouble), but it isn’t just on whether they brought in the guy or not.

Incidentally, how small can these windows get?? :-)

Give a monkey a typewriter and infinite time, and he’ll eventually release Maybin. -- stetzwebs
Unfortunately, experience doesn't always lead to wisdom - Joe P.

by thefourwinds on Aug 25, 2011 8:08 PM EDT up reply actions  

oh, wood has not been good. he has missed guys in space, and been out of position at the snap

some of this could be from rustiness… some of it could be inconsistency around him, could be anything. but as far as your competition view… who was Urbik competed with? i mean, the fact we are shuffling around is to show them we would sit them if they don’t get together… but really, we can’t even actually afford to do anything but start the line we ended with last year… hopefully with rinehart at RG next to an increasingly improving Pears.

by ThaRealTruth on Aug 25, 2011 8:12 PM EDT up reply actions  

Good points.

Year two is upon us.

by Buffalo for Eternity on Aug 25, 2011 8:23 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’ve only seen one with Wood that looked like a possible mis-communication with Urbik. And Fitz got absolutely wrecked on that play.

The others were him being out of position on seal blocks or over extending and reaching at the second level.

by lonestar_ak on Aug 25, 2011 9:45 PM EDT up reply actions  

right but those reaches in the second level

COULD be the result of urbik not getting into space for his guy, and wood trying to adjust to get him. i don’t know this is true, but i don’t know it isn’t. like i said, it is tough to gauge whose “guy” it is when the run a zone scheme, and whoever gets there first gets “that guy”…. ya know?

by ThaRealTruth on Aug 25, 2011 11:40 PM EDT up reply actions  

i just rewatched again.

commented above with more space. if you care to see if you see it the same as i do… before i arrive to rub it in your face how right i was when i get there, here’s your chance… haha.

by ThaRealTruth on Aug 25, 2011 11:42 PM EDT up reply actions  

i have to agree here.

i think each and every one of them has been generally appearing discombobulated.

by ThaRealTruth on Aug 25, 2011 6:21 PM EDT up reply actions  

in RE: to DVR

i have a dvr. i watched each game 3x, running through it more than 3x per play to see as much of each assignment as possible… and honestly… what i saw was inconsistency among all of them, regularly… and irrelevant of front. i mean, they just sucked it up. second stringers easier to watch… and yes… i spent the time on each and every play. watched it regular speed 2x, and a third fully thorough. i saw similar things you did… just without the man crush on Pears. ; ) seriously… he is average at best, probably would be a better LT, and even then his feet are not amazing, and at 6’8" he is giving up leverage to most opponents if he isn’t really low, and he does stand up plenty. so in general… i can’t get on board with much of our line decisions this year.

by ThaRealTruth on Aug 25, 2011 8:09 PM EDT up reply actions  

are you certain you were satisfied with hang’s center play against wilfork and kris jenkins?

by LeClaire Bill on Aug 25, 2011 6:13 PM EDT up reply actions  

I thought Rinehart was decent last year

I was surprised he wasn’t starting in the first place over Urbik, I like them mix and matching but maybe they should bring in Lindy Ruff to help them decide stuff.

by zoomer02 on Aug 25, 2011 10:33 AM EDT reply actions  

If last year is any indication, there is a 16 week competition starting Sept 11, 2011.

Just because we didn’t draft OL high, just because we didn’t sign FA and potentially over spend for not much better than what we already have and because as we have commented infrequently, not article, but comment that our quality depth reserve OL will come from the original starting five if injury happens, I would say that yes Rhinehardt should be given a chance to compete.

While everyone is lambasting the organization or individual player for lack of whatever the coaches are doing exactly what they should be doing moving peices around to see what their options are in preparation for the future. We still have the season plus two more weeks of offseason to evaluate players, competition for the future and upgrade going forward without overspending, drafting high when there are better players available etc……

YOU ARE OUT of you kuku fufu mine craker laker Flaber baber FUNKI chunki brain. WE want to winn every year -- abayarde

by VanScottM on Aug 25, 2011 10:36 AM EDT reply actions  

VanScott hit the nail on the head

This line is and continues to be a work in progress and will until we have basically the 4 perfect fits aside from Wood.

Like I mentioned below, there is not a doubt in my mind that we will grab 2 bodies from other teams cut lists, whether they will be rookies that are put on our PS or if they make the 53 man roster. It has been stated publicly by Gailey that he is unhappy with what he has right now. I think Wood and Pears are the only 2 that are safe as we speak and that could change by the end of today.

"Big Gulps Eh, Well See ya later" - Lloyd Christmas
" You Gus ready To Let The Dogs Out" "What?" " you Know, Who Let the dogs out rough rough rogh rough" - Zack Galifinakis - The Hangover

by PaullyPforPrez on Aug 25, 2011 10:52 AM EDT up reply actions  

Im glad that Gailey is letting them know that nothing will be handed to them. Good that there is compitition. Light a firecracker under their butts.

by loupiccone on Aug 25, 2011 10:37 AM EDT reply actions  

I think the point is

Gailey is handing the job a little too easy to Urbik.

"...You play to win the game. Hello? You play to win the game. You don't play it to just play it. That's the great thing about sports: you play to win, and I don't care if you don't have any wins. You go play to win. When you start tellin' me it doesn't matter, then retire. Get out! 'Cause it matters." ~ Herm Edwards

"Talk's cheap. We all know that. It's like I've always said: 'Don't tell me about the labor pains, just show me the baby.' " ~ Buddy Nix

by Jason from OH-IO on Aug 25, 2011 10:41 AM EDT up reply actions  

I don't think a position has been handed to anyone except maybe Wood

Who actually deserves it.

We have no idea what our starting OL will be in 2 weeks.

At the rate this offseason is going we should have 2 new starters via roster cuts in our starting OL by week 3. Just because Urbik is starting in pre season doesn’t mean anything. It means their trying to give him reps with the first team, thats about it.

Gailey loves pulling guards, and if you’ don’t pull effectivley there is no way you will start in his offense. Last year he was pulling Levitre in pass blocking thats how much the guy loves pulling. So if a guy comes available that can pull and block effectivley i guarantee he’s on our roster

"Big Gulps Eh, Well See ya later" - Lloyd Christmas
" You Gus ready To Let The Dogs Out" "What?" " you Know, Who Let the dogs out rough rough rogh rough" - Zack Galifinakis - The Hangover

by PaullyPforPrez on Aug 25, 2011 10:47 AM EDT up reply actions  

Exactly

I think it’s safe to say Rinehart’s reps at LG will give them enough film to determine if he should start at RG. Rinehart is really growning on me, he’s very quick when pulling and has appeared more physical than Urbik so far.

We have to remember the entire evaluation process is delayed this year due to not off-season. The coaches mentioned the new timeline would be Sep 11th, not the 2nd pre-season game as it usually is.

by lonestar_ak on Aug 25, 2011 9:50 PM EDT up reply actions  

Question -

I don’t know the nuances of interior line play – would Rinehart have some particular skill or technique that lends itself to playing LG rather that RG? if so, maybe that makes him more or less likely to compete for the RG spot.

If not, I’m puzzled. I was fairly shocked when they announced Levitre would be splitting time at his given spot at LG, even more so when they announced he’d be competing for LT. It seems nuts to start moving established guys (Wood, Levitre, Bell) around when you still haven’t achieved continuity with the new guys (Pears, Urbik) on the line.

The closer they get to the regular season without that continuity, the later into the regular season it will go before they establish it. If I were Fitz, in a contract year, and they’re tinkering with my already shaky line, I’d be pretty ticked.

by T McGee on Aug 25, 2011 10:41 AM EDT reply actions  

LG tends to need to be a little quicker and more agile than the RG but it depends quite a bit on scheme. RG is usually a pusher who can handle short pulls while the LG doesn’t have to push quite as much but will often have longer pulls.

Keep in mind this is a general description and can change quite a bit based upon the offense they run. I’m used to LG pulling across the formation and helping explode a hole much like a fullback, especially in a spread offense.

by Lifyre on Aug 25, 2011 11:29 AM EDT up reply actions  

Continuity.....

I think having Rinehart try out at left guard, could be his tryout for right guard. I don’t think gailey wants to yank his young guy (urbik) out so fast. It takes time to let a guy get comfortable starting. Urbik should get more than 2 preseason games to see what he can do. He gave rinehart some time at left because levitre needed a fire lit and he also could handle less reps more than anyone on the line.
This preseason has done a lot to shake my confidence in Gailey, but I am going to try to keep it at least till October and give him the benefit of doubt…I could say the exact same thing about Fitz (OB-Wan) and I will.
I remember Gailey really looked like a great coordinator last year and i hope we all try to keep that in mind.

go bills!

PodunkO - The great post ender!

by podunkowego on Aug 25, 2011 10:49 AM EDT reply actions  

urbik has done nothing as of yet to prove he deserves the start

gailey has tinkered and toyed with the pourous o-line all offseason. the interior of our line was supposed to be the strongest part coming into the offseason last year but he (gailey) blew that up by shifting wood to center, dropping hangartener to second team, and allowing urbik to become the uncontested RG. Add to that the fact that he opened competition for the starting job at left guard despite the fact that levitre is a proven starter and you can see that this line is completely in flux. We came into the offseason seriously needing some help on the exterior of the line at tackle and tightend spots but end up destroying the middle. How about we move wood back to RG, start hangartner at center like he should be, and let rhinehart battle it out with bell for the LT spot?

by narcissist on Aug 25, 2011 10:51 AM EDT reply actions  

Wood to center.....

Last year, I must have read a thousand times, how we must get hangartner outta there and move Wood to center.
I find it hilarious how many posters want the hangman back in. It is funny – how bad can go to worse, but I say, give urbik more time.
The whole line stunk against Denver, Wood included, I think it best to burn the game tape on that one.

gobills!

PodunkO - The great post ender!

by podunkowego on Aug 25, 2011 10:58 AM EDT reply actions  

Not everyone

I always felt that Hangartner played center well. Furthermore, I think the call to arms to have Wood moved to center was based on Wood being potentially an exceptional Center where Hang would be average or slightly better than average.

"...You play to win the game. Hello? You play to win the game. You don't play it to just play it. That's the great thing about sports: you play to win, and I don't care if you don't have any wins. You go play to win. When you start tellin' me it doesn't matter, then retire. Get out! 'Cause it matters." ~ Herm Edwards

"Talk's cheap. We all know that. It's like I've always said: 'Don't tell me about the labor pains, just show me the baby.' " ~ Buddy Nix

by Jason from OH-IO on Aug 25, 2011 12:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

Best 5 guys

It doesn’t matter to me how much tinkering he does before the season starts. I understand that we’re not going to be a terribly good football team for the first half of the season, so I say that we find the best five guys however that is done. We were 4-12 last year. As dnvrBillsfan posted above, no position along the OL should be safe. I don’t know how talent is evaluated in the Nix/Gailey regime, but if it’s done by moving people all along the line and seeing who sticks, then so be it. Just have the outcome be the best possible OL by the start of the season and then let them gel as the season progresses.

"Slowly all the roles we act out become our identity. And in the end we are what we pretend to be." - Jerry Cantrell.

by stetzwebs on Aug 25, 2011 11:06 AM EDT reply actions  

I think one idea being glossed over is....

The fact that our tackle situation is so bad, they have had to try Levitre out there. Bell has stunk, but there is literally nobody behind him to fill in. Who or what is the swing tackle? Is Wang so far back, he isnt even a realistic option as the swing tackle?

There should have been real competition brought in, draft or free agency, these past two years, but there should have been lots of things done that weren’t. We just have to hope Bell works out his issues and starts playing like a starting offensive lineman. Its time for some of these guys to actually start swimming instead of drowning (Bell, Spiller, Urbik, McKelvin, Troup, Wang, Nelson, etc etc etc).

~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."

by Kurupt on Aug 25, 2011 11:06 AM EDT via mobile reply actions   2 recs

I Wonder...

how much different the team would look if Buddy’s only financial restraint was to keep under the league max?
I wonder if they made a mistake giving Clabo time to think about it. maybe they, should have moved on to the next best right away……although I think the drop off was precipitous…..
Should we have just bought Clabo? you know, gave him an offer hr couldn’t refuse?
I say no…..nothing good ever seems to come from outta wack contracts unless it is a QB or an extremely dominant player.

PodunkO - The great post ender!

by podunkowego on Aug 25, 2011 11:16 AM EDT up reply actions  

Someday you will appreciate how everyone in this world at one time or another needs to be humbled in their efforts.

That is all this is, but since we are in the middle of a preseason with Bell playing okay against the Bears and Julius Peppers and then embarrassing himself against the Broncos in a base offense facing a blitzing defense with an all pro and second pick in the first round of the most recent draft has created a sky is falling atmosphere. It is not surprising and should be a well accepted/approved approach by the coaching staff more than a criticism toward their efforts. I stand behind the fact that Nix has made his adjustments to the O-Line during the season last year and focusing on the defense in the draft and free agency. For him to throw in the towell now and say I should of signed this guy or that guy to play tackle would be more ridiculous than working with the players he has on the roster. Our tackle situation is bad, only because it is not great, and Bell stunk for one half of one game. To think he would start out as great is reaching at this point and to think that Gailey plans to run a base offensive line all season is also reaching.

YOU ARE OUT of you kuku fufu mine craker laker Flaber baber FUNKI chunki brain. WE want to winn every year -- abayarde

by VanScottM on Aug 25, 2011 12:24 PM EDT up reply actions  

We are a hot mess K, no doubt about it…

"...You play to win the game. Hello? You play to win the game. You don't play it to just play it. That's the great thing about sports: you play to win, and I don't care if you don't have any wins. You go play to win. When you start tellin' me it doesn't matter, then retire. Get out! 'Cause it matters." ~ Herm Edwards

"Talk's cheap. We all know that. It's like I've always said: 'Don't tell me about the labor pains, just show me the baby.' " ~ Buddy Nix

by Jason from OH-IO on Aug 25, 2011 12:28 PM EDT up reply actions  

we were doomed the moment we failed to acquire Peyton Manning from the Colts.

YOU ARE OUT of you kuku fufu mine craker laker Flaber baber FUNKI chunki brain. WE want to winn every year -- abayarde

by VanScottM on Aug 25, 2011 12:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

I hoping Levitre works out at LT (I have no idea how likely that is- maybe a 20% shot in the dark). If it was up to me, I’d leave Rinehart at LG in case Levitre moves over and I’d start getting Hangartner reps with the 1’s at RG.

"There's only one C.J. Spiller." -Buddy Nix

by Port Royal on Aug 25, 2011 11:08 AM EDT reply actions  

I'm expecting a signing or two...

of some guy who gets cut by another team. 3 of our top 8 linemen were acquired that way, so it makes sense that the trend would continue.

Check out buddynixon.com for more of my work.

by cjf4 on Aug 25, 2011 11:11 AM EDT reply actions  

Also

I think the ‘open competition’ is a catch all term that doesn’t do a good job describing the situation. The only starter entrenched is Wood. Other than that, everyone’s starting job is on the line and they’ll continue to shift guys around until they find a combination that works.

Check out buddynixon.com for more of my work.

by cjf4 on Aug 25, 2011 11:14 AM EDT reply actions  

Absurd.....

“Bell maintains that his confidence is unaffected by what has unfolded during the practice week. As much as the lineman has accepted the fact that it is a business, there’s no denying he has a strong working relationship with the player he’s competing with for the starting job.

Bell and Levitre have worked together on the left side of Buffalo’s offensive line for the past two seasons at left tackle and left guard respectively. Now they’re pitted against one another, making for an awkward situation.

"I really haven’t talked to Andy," said Bell. "It’s football, people come and people go. I think we’ve just got to be pros and whatever decision is made we just take and live with it.""

What a ridiculous Chris Brown excerpt! Just more bad vibes from one bills drive….

gobills!

PodunkO - The great post ender!

by podunkowego on Aug 25, 2011 11:25 AM EDT reply actions  

No Brainer...

You put your right guard in,
You put your right guard out;
You put your right guard in,
And you move him all about.
He does the Hokey-Pokey,
And you move him around.
That’s what it’s all about!

You put your left guard in,
You put your left guard out;
You put your left guard in,
And you move him all about.
He does the Hokey-Pokey,
And you move him around.
That’s what it’s all about!

.

"Only in a rock and roll band can someone like Keith Richards perceive himself as the responsible one."

-- Malcolm Gladwell

by Goose22 on Aug 25, 2011 11:26 AM EDT reply actions  

One paragraph would have sufficed.

Check out buddynixon.com for more of my work.

by cjf4 on Aug 25, 2011 12:52 PM EDT up reply actions  

Poor Poor Helen...

Keeps getting mentioned with the Bills…

"Only in a rock and roll band can someone like Keith Richards perceive himself as the responsible one."

-- Malcolm Gladwell

by Goose22 on Aug 25, 2011 2:30 PM EDT up reply actions  

competition, yes

competition fueled by job interviews would be better. Stirring around a pot of bad stew doesn’t make it taste better.

Y'all- There's a "D" in rebuild, but no "O"- The gospel according to Buddy Nix 4:12

by fansince60 on Aug 25, 2011 11:47 AM EDT reply actions  

I'm a fan of Rinehart's style so far

To answer Brian’s question, yes. This is because I believe EVERY job should be open to competition. I don’t think Urbik is bad, but he is not very impressive yet either. He does anchor much better than Hang in pass pro though. I’ve watched him, Bell and Reinhart multiples times each play. He seems like just another guy at this point to me with a fairly low ceiling.

I think Rinehart has been competing with Urbik so far this pre-season. Levitre is a known quantity, and as Gailey said, he hasn’t played poorly to lose a job. I believe they were letting Rinehart get the LG reps since that’s where he had been playing with the 2’s and was comfortable with, it also gives them more film on Urbik.

Rinehart has a suddenness and physical element to his game that Levitre/Hang/Urbik don’t match in my book. He finishes more blocks then the others so far this year and also gets to the second level quicker and more decisively.

As far as Bell’s horrendous game in Denver, which has to be the worst I’ve seen him play, I’m not terribly surprised as they left him 1 on 1 vs an elite rusher in Dumerville. Gailey touched on that being their intention for the entire OL, to see who could play and who couldn’t. My issue with that is it left Fitz in the cross-hairs. I’m confident that Bell, if he’s not replaced, would not be left to hang like that during the season.

Speaking of Fitz, I see him and Spiller as responsible for 2 of the nastier shots that Fitz took on some of the dogs the Broncos were running. Spiller still has a lot of work to do reading protections, he’s willing, but his awareness is still sub-par.

The worst shot Fitz took, just before the pick, is on him. He had the line shifted to the right, brought Spiller into the backfield on the right side of the formation. Fitz either didn’t see the unaccounted LB or expected Spiller to make a very difficult pick-up.

by lonestar_ak on Aug 25, 2011 3:01 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

Rinehart/Urbik Iowa Homer Insight (or lack there of)

Please bear with me on this:

Rinehart and Urbik are similar types of players in regard to how they were coached in college. The type of offensive style they were good at that caused them both to be drafted reasonably high (3rd round) might shed a little light on why Gailey is competing Rinehart with Levitre and leaving Urbik alone. For now at least.

Both learned from coaches from the Hayden Fry tree. Urbik from Bret Bielema at Wisconsin, Rineheart from Mark Farley at the U of Northern Iowa.

Bielema was a d-linemen at Iowa under Fry. He also coached D under Bill Snyder at Kansas State. God forbid, he took a job in Wisconsin quite successfully and coached Kraig Urbik there. I hope he had his Hawk tattoo removed from his leg. Traitor. :)
Farley played LB at UNI and learned from Terry Allen, who learned from Bill Snyder, who learned from Fry and coached Chad Rinehart at UNI.

Wisconsin and Northern Iowa play very similar types of offensive football. While Northern Iowa does throw the ball a lot, they still rely on play action and big, strong, aggressive, move straight ahead, no nonsense, nasty tempered offensive linemen.

I’d hazard a guess that the Bills coaching staff sees these similarities in play style in Urbik and Rinehart – as opposed to what Levitre offers in skill set. He pulls well and seems pretty mobile, but he’s not going to knock many people on their arse and enjoy it, where Urbik and Rinehart will.

Just an Iowa football junkie’s two cents.

by LeClaire Bill on Aug 25, 2011 6:50 PM EDT reply actions   1 recs

Thanks for that insight.

Year two is upon us.

by Buffalo for Eternity on Aug 25, 2011 7:27 PM EDT up reply actions  

I’d also add that I can’t figure out why Gailey wants this strategy coupled with Spiller. I’m sure no offensive line savant, but Wood and Levitre at the guard spots seemed to pull and trap reasonably well, and frequently. That seems to dovetail with the “get Spiller the ball in space” screen game, quick hit passes, etc.philosophy.
(And don’t even get me going on another poster’s comment that Scott Chandler was running a TE screen and ran over Rinehart. Uh. That is not what either does well.)

To my eyes, that is NOT Urbik and Rinehart’s forte. At all. Frankly, nothing they’ve done so far even resembles a “forte.” But, based on their college coaching and physical make up/style – until Spiller learns to run between the tackles – I don’t get it. Fred Jackson would run great behind these two. Spiller, not so much, in my opinion.

by LeClaire Bill on Aug 25, 2011 7:56 PM EDT up reply actions  

Frankly, nothing they’ve done so far even resembles a "forte."

Now that is sig worthy.

Year two is upon us.

by Buffalo for Eternity on Aug 25, 2011 8:26 PM EDT up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

SB Nation's home for all things Buffalo Bills.
Community Guidelines :: Essential BR

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Bills_small
An Exploration of Ryan Fitzpatrick's TDs and INTs
Small
Beyond the Perfect Offseason: Where Do We Go From Here?
Dsc00843_small
NFL Divisional Record And Playoff Berth Correlation, 2002-2011

Recent FanPosts

Small
Who Will be the Number 2?
Spikes_small
Remaining Free Agents
04_buffalo_bills_football_coloring_at_coloring-pages-book-for-kids-boys_small
Mock 2012 Season
Small
The Return of the Running Back(s): Revisiting the Road to the Super Bowl
Small
Difference Between A "Franchise" QB and an "Elite" One
303857_872291743296_10504698_40499694_6362492_n_small
Be A Little Nicer Please, Bills Fans  :)
Cyclops1-12nd7cv_small
Current QB Wins
Small
The Count-Down to the Right Numbers
Bruuuuce_small
Ranking All 32 NFL Starting QB's : Who is ELITE?
Snapshot_20120113_small
Next Stop: 3rd Generation of Winners

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Screen_shot_2012-03-07_at_6 Brian Galliford

100_2488_small MattRichWarren

Authors

Range_march_2011_small Ron From NM

Slide1_small Der Jaeger

Moderators

Sucks_small Kurupt

Mrsinister03_small sireric

Cordy_small poz