Bills 41, Chiefs 7: Notes From The O-Line, Week 1
It's a lot more fun to re-watch games where the Buffalo Bills have performed fairly well offensively. It would have been better still had DirecTV not had issues in my neck of the desert during the second half. I did get to see all of the first half, and the majority of the second. The breakdown for the line in the first half - 17 runs and 17 passes - follows after the jump. When time permits, I'll get what I can from my intermittent recording of the second half.
I was particularly interested in Demetrius Bell. Given Chan Gailey's history of giving linemen the yo-yo treatment (rotating linemen in and out of games, sometimes at bafflingly random moments), I watched to see if Chris Hairston would take reps at left tackle. He did, but not in the first half - and not until the game was no longer in doubt.
Bell kept Hairston on the bench by posting a respectable game. He had 15 decent run plays along with two bad ones. On the fourth run (first drive), Bell let Tamba Hali rush upfield, but didn't stay with him. Hali looped around and made the tackle. On run No. 15 (sixth drive), Glenn Dorsey got under Bell's pads and into Fred Jackson's run lane. He graded out at 72.7% on run plays. On pass plays, Bell had one good play, 14 decent and two bad. His one good play (pass No. 14, fifth drive) was a cut block on a linebacker to open a great throwing lane which was squandered by a bad pass. Bell's bad pass plays were pass No. 10 (fourth drive), in which he fell over chasing a twisting Hali, and pass No. 12 (fifth drive) in which Hali zipped right past Bell (and then past Jackson). His grade on pass plays was 73.8%. Bell got help on three pass plays in the first half. When the line slanted to the right, Bell was usually left in place with a back or tight end (sometimes both) to pick up one or two defenders.
Andy Levitre and Eric Wood had identical grades; 78.5% on run plays and 73.8% on pass plays. Levitre hit three guys on the fourth run (first drive), while Wood drove Wallace Gilberry all over the field on the same play. They combined again on the fifth run (second drive) when Levitre cut Derrick Johnson well downfield and Wood drove Kelly Gregg four yards backwards. On the seventh run (third drive), Levitre ended up looking like he had blocked in the back - but in reality, his defender turned around trying to get free of Levitre while Wood treated Gilberry like a blocking sled. On the ninth run (fourth drive), Wood peeled off of a block to get just enough of Johnson, who was shooting a gap, to save Brad Smith from a tackle for loss. On the next play, Levitre pulled and drove the linebacker out of the hole, which allowed Jackson to pick up six yards; Levitre followed that up by getting great drive to open a hole for Jackson to get three more yards. On run No. 13 (fifth drive still), Wood again made Gilberry look like he was wearing roller skates instead of cleats.
On the negative side of the ledger, Wood was driven down to his knees by Allen Bailey on Buffalo's first play from scrimmage, which almost led to no gain. Levitre missed a cut on Jovan Belcher at the line of scrimmage the very next play. Both Wood and Levitre were abused on run No. 14, which was a one-yard loss. Levitre had a single good pass play - pass No. 14, cutting an end to open a throwing lane just as Bell cut a linebacker - and two bad pass plays. On pass No. 7, Gilberry twisted to the outside and Levitre was left running after him - not a good position for any lineman. Levitre and Wood whiffed on pass No. 10 (fourth drive); Levitre was walked back into Ryan Fitzpatrick, while Wood was bulldozed by Hali - but the play still went to David Nelson for 35 yards.
Kraig Urbik had a quiet day. He graded out at 73.8% on both run and pass plays. He had one good run play and two bad. The good play was the last drive of the half in which he turned Bailey every which way but loose. Both of his bad plays were on the first drive. On the second run, he was bounced backwards by a linebacker, and on the fourth run, he whiffed in an attempt to block Cameron Sheffield in space. His only bad pass play was a screen on the second drive in which he whiffed on a cut of Belcher at the second level, which let Belcher make the tackle.
Erik Pears likewise had a quiet day. He did give up a sack in the second half to kill the opening drive, but was solid in the first. On the fourth drive, Pears had back-to-back good run plays (Nos. 8 and 9) in which he drove a linebacker four yards, then cut Tyson Jackson. His poor plays were on the next drive, in which Pears had an outright takedown on Bailey that should have drawn a flag. Pears had no bad pass plays in the first half, but did have one good play. On the last play of the fifth drive, Pears threw down Thomas Gafford, then threw him down again - a la The Life of Brian - when Gafford got back up. Pears graded out at 75.0% on run plays and 76.2% on pass plays. He had help on three pass plays (Nos. 15, 16, 17), all on the last two drives of the half. However, the Bills slanted the line to the right several times, which also gave Pears some support.
The Chiefs only blitzed five times in the first half. Fitzpatrick had one bad pass, one drop and one throw where Donald Jones could have gotten his feet down. His two completions against the blitz went for 19 yards (and a first down) and 14 yards (setting up 3rd-and-1). Look for the Raiders to bring more pressure on pass downs.
The Chiefs also laid back on run plays, loading the box just once in the first half (run No. 2, which went for five yards). The Bills rushed three times for 11 yards (3.7 yards per carry) through the left C gap, six times for 29 yards (4.8) through the left B gap, five times for nine yards (1.8) through the A gap, two times for nine yards (4.5) through the right B gap, and one time for one yard (1.0) through the right C gap. For a guy who publicly mused about upheaval on the left side of the offensive line, Gailey called over 50% of first half runs to that side. Perhaps he was looking to test Bell. If so, Demetrius answered the bell in Week 1. (Yeah, that was cheesy.)
43 comments
|
13 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
If so, Demetrius answered the bell in Week 1
Hope that rings true in the coming 15 weeks…(equally as cheesy)
Y'all- There's a "D" in rebuild, but no "O"- The gospel according to Buddy Nix 4:12
by fansince60 on Sep 13, 2011 9:53 AM EDT reply actions 2 recs
all this cheese this morning doesn't bold well for the day ahead.
YOU ARE OUT of you kuku fufu mine craker laker Flaber baber FUNKI chunki brain. WE want to winn every year -- abayarde
mental image there
Ewwwww
by lonestar_ak on Sep 13, 2011 2:05 PM EDT via iPhone app up reply actions
Rec
You’re a genius with this stuff. Your OL grading system needs to be the NFL standard.
Never confuse movement with action.
~Ernest Hemingway
So what your saying is that Direct TV has some issues?
Gotta be Nix’s fault for not bring in competition. I mean we do play in the southwest on occassion. I am voting failure on his next poll :).
YOU ARE OUT of you kuku fufu mine craker laker Flaber baber FUNKI chunki brain. WE want to winn every year -- abayarde
by VanScottM on Sep 13, 2011 10:01 AM EDT reply actions 2 recs
On pass plays, Bell had one good play, 14 decent and two bad. His one good play (pass No. 14, fifth drive) was a cut block on a linebacker to open a great throwing lane which was squandered by a bad pass.
You must have skipped Steve Johnson’s TD. Tamba Hali exploded out of the gate off the edge, yet Bell managed to get his leg over and lean all the way over to stay completely square. If that’s not a good play, I’m not sure what is.
Check out buddynixon.com for more of my work.
I think that counts as just a regular play because that was the man that Bell was supposed to be blocking. Somewhere there was an explaination of what a ‘good’ play meant. Maybe someone can post a link to that.
Never confuse movement with action.
~Ernest Hemingway
by NolaBillsFan on Sep 13, 2011 10:05 AM EDT up reply actions
If so, there are some serious issues with the methodology here.
Check out buddynixon.com for more of my work.
No
When you read the grading system it makes sense.
Someone help me out here and post a link
Never confuse movement with action.
~Ernest Hemingway
by NolaBillsFan on Sep 13, 2011 10:10 AM EDT up reply actions
Well, its just worth keeping in mind that there is no degree of difficulty adjustment. If Bell stops the other teams best pass rusher all game like he’s told to, he grades out at 75%.
I have low expectations. But high hopes.
by greysquirrel on Sep 13, 2011 10:36 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Similarly, if he does it all game and has help on every play, he ALSO grades out at 75%, but one performance is more impressive than the other.
I have low expectations. But high hopes.
by greysquirrel on Sep 13, 2011 10:53 AM EDT up reply actions
I think the methodology is ok as is. It sounds like your issue is that it doesn’t take into account how great Bell’s technique is. I agree, Bell’s day was better than Ron’s grade sounds, but his system is designed to grade the lineman’s ability to complete their assignment and the direct result of said assignment on that play. It would take a seriously expansive and subjective grading system to systematically grade great technique as well.
That said, you make a good point. Bell looked awesome on that play.
THAT is why i'm serious.
In Ron’s system, that’s a decent play – he stays assignment sound and takes care of his responsibility. A “good” play is when he goes beyond his responsibility and/or flashes dominance, and a “bad” play is when he fails his assignment.
Editor-in-Chief, BUFFALO RUMBLINGS®
@BrianGalliford
by Brian Galliford on Sep 13, 2011 10:21 AM EDT up reply actions
Hali, one of the league’s most dominant pass rushers, absolutely exploded off the edge, and Bell made an extremely athletic play to stonewall him. That’s ‘dominant’, and was a far more critical play than cutting some linebacker.
Check out buddynixon.com for more of my work.
No one said the system isn’t subjective. I was merely explaining the methodology you were questioning.
Editor-in-Chief, BUFFALO RUMBLINGS®
@BrianGalliford
by Brian Galliford on Sep 13, 2011 10:43 AM EDT up reply actions
Putting a defender on the ground effectively removes him from the play so I rate those as good plays. I don’t get too deep into the weeds because I’m watching the same angles you are. Its often impossible to tell what a player is doing technique wise from the sideline angle. It is possible to see the result of the block in almost all instances. I’d be thrilled if all of the linemen graded out at 75 on pass plays because it would mean that Fitz had time enough and room enough to make his throws…barring hits by blitzers that either a RB or TE should have picked up or that Fitz should have seen like a blitzing DB.
I wasn't sure I was going to like the white helmets but seeing them in the practice footage, I've got to say that I love the look.
by Ron From NM on Sep 13, 2011 11:07 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
For as well as the line played, the grades still weren’t all that good. No one over 80% either run-blocking or pass-blocking.
Only first half grades. Might be higher for the whole game.
Never confuse movement with action.
~Ernest Hemingway
by NolaBillsFan on Sep 13, 2011 10:21 AM EDT up reply actions
its very hard to get over 80%
The line wasnt the reason Fred Jackson had the day he did, that was Fred Jackson being magnificent but they certainly turned in a fine effort in support of their running back and for the most part, kept Ryan Fitzpatrick clean – the result of which was evident by his flawless day. The line deserves credit for what I think was a solid outing against a good team.
For a while now Ive believed Ryan Fitzpatrick can be a terror if he is given good time in the pocket, we got a glimpse of that on Sunday.
I think the grades are accurate for the performance.
This even grates my passive cheese - LeClaire Bill
by poz on Sep 13, 2011 10:50 AM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I don’t know that I’d call KC a good team. The were more like a gaggle. The line did well against very little pressure…..look for that to change next week.
I wasn't sure I was going to like the white helmets but seeing them in the practice footage, I've got to say that I love the look.
by Ron From NM on Sep 13, 2011 11:08 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
The Raiders do scare me, they played very physical in the trenches last night
I still think this games performance is directly tied to what Fred Jackson was able to do in the running game but like you said, the line was respectable
This even grates my passive cheese - LeClaire Bill
I think Spiller may be more of a factor this week. Less running between the tackles and more outside runs and misdirections to try and counter the physical nature of the Raiders DL
Never confuse movement with action.
~Ernest Hemingway
by NolaBillsFan on Sep 13, 2011 11:13 AM EDT up reply actions
Im curious to see how Spiller is utilized moving forward
following such a great opening effort by Jackson, if your Chan Gailey do you see what Fred can do on the outside first or do you start making the weeks gameplan for CJ?
This even grates my passive cheese - LeClaire Bill
Gailey is old school
We’re so hung up on Gaileys comments about the left side of the line in preseason but it’s abundantly clear to me that his moves & comments were all about motivation. The guys on the left side were more established and he felt he needed to light a fire under them and make a point! The guys on the right side are finding their way and he didn’t want to mess with already shaky confidence….this is exactly the type of move that my high school coach, another old school guy, would pull!
by Barman23 on Sep 13, 2011 10:24 AM EDT via mobile reply actions 5 recs
Great Job Ron
It will be interesting to see what approach the Raiders will take next Sunday. They will view the tape, they will scheme to penetrate different areas of the O-Line from that tape. It will be interesting and I expect to see alot of play action, so Fitz needs to practice throws on the move. Great job.
You provide a very comprehensive study, sorry about the Direct TV thing, even us cable people suffer with storms and outages. They are not popular by no means. We have picked up more observers to the site in the past six months, I am sure you will get your normal critiquing from your observations, me included. I am wondering if you or anyone else other than me would be interested in comparing results from other websites so we can compare results to other analyst’s of a teams offensive line performance. This is where your work is more valuable to the overall effectiveness of the final product. You study the bills offensive line while some sites study the leagues offensive line. What I am saying is that I see Jason Peters get beat almost as often as other LT’s in the league yet he is a perrineal pro bowler and the D. Bells of the league get ridiculed for the playing the same position and performing well. Just an idea, not suggesting you invest more time, I know I don’t have the time.
YOU ARE OUT of you kuku fufu mine craker laker Flaber baber FUNKI chunki brain. WE want to winn every year -- abayarde
Rec'd
Thanks as always for the hard work Ron.
We will not rest until we see these capitalist octopuses annihilated.
-Che Marrone
These read like similar numbers from any game last year right? But we averaged 5+ YPC and Fitz seemed to have a clean pocket. I guess I’m struggling to equate these numbers to on field performance. Was there really only on killed play by Pears? Kind of incredible if so, maybe thats the stat I’m missing.
I have low expectations. But high hopes.
as a point of comparison
in week 1 last year Bell had one good plays, 34 decent, 8 bad, 3 killed, and 2 sacks and scored 71.7 against the run and 71.9 against the pass. While its only one half I think we can say that Bell didnt get much worse in the second half and stayed solid so its a good measuring stick to point out he had one good play, 29 decent, 4 bad, 0 sacks and scored 72.7 against the run and 73.8 against the pass.
In Ron’s system that is a notable difference for the better. As Ron said not great but respectable but the difference is there.
This even grates my passive cheese - LeClaire Bill
Week one was a disaster. Compare it to the games after the bye.
I have low expectations. But high hopes.
by greysquirrel on Sep 13, 2011 10:57 AM EDT up reply actions
fair point
but you could argue this game is also an aberration :) (though I dont like to think so)
But Bell averaged 75.5 against the run and 73.7 against the pass making his performance yesterday slightly below his 2010 average against the run (again, he was a great run blocker last year) and about average against the pass in Ron’s system.
Looks like your point was a fair one so I checked out Andy Levitre to see how he compared, last year he averaged about the same in the pass protection and a little bit better against the run.
So your original point looks to be interesting though I though the line did solid and played its most mistake free game so maybe those mistakes add up? Also, I think Fred Jackson and Ryan Fitzpatrick deserve all the praise they are getting, they were wonderful, perhaps they played that well? Interesting observation. As you noted, the lack of killed plays sticks out in this report
This even grates my passive cheese - LeClaire Bill
I should have said “many games last year” not “any game”
I have low expectations. But high hopes.
by greysquirrel on Sep 13, 2011 11:19 AM EDT up reply actions
I deleted weeks 1,2 and 17 from my memory banks :-) No Fitz= No comprehende.
I have low expectations. But high hopes.
by greysquirrel on Sep 13, 2011 10:59 AM EDT up reply actions
Vs an elite pass rusher who specializes in bull rushing, which bell struggled with last year, as well.
by bizarro bills on Sep 13, 2011 11:06 AM EDT via mobile up reply actions
The line played well as a whole
There were individual mistakes, as there will be, but if the unit can be more good than bad, they’ll give Fitz and Jackson chances to succeed.
What were the Chiefs doing having Gilberry over Wood? I’d be upset if Wood didn’t treat him like a puppet considering he’s a 270 lb DE.
Levitre and Wood whiffed on pass No. 10 (fourth drive); Levitre was walked back into Ryan Fitzpatrick, while Wood was bulldozed by Hali – but the play still went to David Nelson for 35 yards.
And that’s the beauty of OL success sometimes. Both Wood and Levitre lost the leverage battle, but still allowed Fitz enough time to get the pass off. Sometimes all it takes is getting in the way long enough to give the QB a chance to find a receiver. It’s much better than getting immediately beat and chasing after the defender (like Wrotto always had to do).
I thought the tackles did a nice job, keeping Hali quiet for most of the day and providing running lanes for Jackson. Pears looked particularly solid showing he may be capable of handling the position all year. A guy that big needs to continue getting his hands into defenders and keeping a strong base. Last night, Nate Solder (6’8") dominated Cameron Wake by getting his hands into Wake’s chest immediately and not letting him go. Wake couldn’t get around him as a result and Solder just controlled him all night long. I hope Pears can utilize similar technique all year.
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
Bills
Why were there no bills highlights on sportscenter?? Just wondering if anyone else noticed that accoring to espn Buffalo did not play this weekend …. cool
I saw their highlights. Jammed them into the last half-hour of a 90-minute show on Monday morning.
Editor-in-Chief, BUFFALO RUMBLINGS®
@BrianGalliford
by Brian Galliford on Sep 13, 2011 12:03 PM EDT up reply actions
4 Letters
E S P N
"That's not how I do it. But, hey, everyone is different , that's why Baskin-Robbins got 31flavors" - Chan Gailey
by Buffalo Stro on Sep 13, 2011 12:14 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
NFL Network...
was even worse. It was the Cam Newton, Texans, Steelers show on Sunday night… Oh well…someday.
1964 and 1965 League Champions, and don't you forget it!
Rec'd
Excellent work Ron, as usual.
Ron, is it too much to ask if you could grade or simply acknoledge how TEs do when they are asked to pass or run block?
































