Bills 34, Patriots 31: Notes From the O-Line, Week 3
Well, that was certainly a different way to end a game with the New England Patriots. Count me as one of those who left the Buffalo Bills for dead when the score was 21-0. Clearly, these are not the same Bills who had lost 15 straight games to New England. Instead, we all saw the Bills retain a belief that a comeback was possible.
Less noticeable was the fact that the Bills' offensive line limited mistakes after the initial three drives (two interceptions and a punt). It was interesting to note that 6-of-11 bad pass plays (and 1-of-4 bad run plays) came on those opening three drives. Seven offensive line mistakes on the first 16 plays certainly help account for Buffalo's slow offensive start on Sunday. Add in the interception off of Donald Jones' hands, Brad Smith's drop, and Steve Johnson not setting himself up beyond the marker on a third down reception, and it's easy to understand why Buffalo was so offensively offensive at the start of the game.
| Individual Run Grades - Week 3 | |||||
| Player | Good | Decent | Bad | Killed | Grade |
| Bell, D. | 78.5% | ||||
| Levitre, A. | 82.1% | ||||
| Wood, E. | 79.7% | ||||
| Rinehart, C. | 75.0% | ||||
| Pears, E. | 76.2% | ||||
The left side of the line (Demetrius Bell, Andy Levitre and Eric Wood) averaged about 80% on run plays. While guys tend to move around on run plays - Levitre and Chad Rinehart are prime candidates to pull - this week those grades translated into the Bills averaging gaudy numbers in the Left C, Left B and A gaps. Due to the aforementioned slow start, the Bills weren't in position to pound the ball, with just 17 rushes before all of those kneel downs in the red zone.
| Run Direction Success, Week 3 | |||
| Gap | Att | Yds | YPA |
| Left C | 4 | 30 | 7.5 |
| Left B | 1 | 6 | 6.0 |
| A | 6 | 42 | 7.0 |
| Right B | 4 | 4 | 1.0 |
| Right C | 2 | 6 | 3.0 |
Had the Bills not been trailing so badly for so much of the game, it's easy to imagine Jackson putting up well over 100 yards. The reason? New England's defensive line came into Buffalo hurting, and three of their defenders didn't play. The upshot was that the Patriots didn't have much of a defensive line rotation. This doubtlessly played a role in Buffalo's linemen limiting mistakes as the game wore on, though you could make the case that guys who had never beaten the Patriots - like Bell - had the butterflies settle a few drives into the game.
| Individual Pass Grades, Week 3 | |||||||
| Player | Good | Decent | Bad | Killed | Sack | Help | Grade |
| Bell, D. | 0 | 38 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 72.3% |
| Levitre, A. | 1 | 43 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 75.6% |
| Wood, E | 1 | 42 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 75.0% |
| Rinehart, C. | 0 | 43 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 74.6% |
| Pears, E. | 1 | 40 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 74.1% |
Bell easily had the worst game on passing downs, but it's important to note that four of his six bad pass plays came on those opening three drives. After that, he had just two more bad passes on the 33 remaining throws. Everyone except Levitre killed one pass play, though Rinehart's killed pass play was redeemed (sort of) by a roughing the passer penalty. Again, the Bills didn't often help the tackles with chips from backs or tight ends. Instead, Jackson was often left in the backfield and expected to block a LB one-on-one. He did a great job - and his ability to block consistently seems the most likely reason for Spiller's negligible role.
The Patriots only blitzed on six of Buffalo's 44 pass plays. The lack of defensive line rotation possibly contributed. More likely, however, the cause for the limited pressure is to be found in how well Ryan Fitzpatrick did against the blitz last week. Indeed, he put up 115 yards and three first downs (would have been about 125 yards and four first downs if not for a Jones drop), so Bill Belichick wasn't wrong to sit back in coverage.
While the line has performed well enough, the Patriots aren't a gauge in terms of pressure defense. The Bills will see some more exotic looks when the Eagles come to town, and an above average front seven when playing the Giants the week after that. Perhaps the biggest test for the offensive line will come against the Jets.
The Patriots streak is over. The more important playoff streak remains...
29 comments
|
7 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
For the record: yes, I’ve got a note out to Ron regarding the missing data in the first chart.
Editor-in-Chief, BUFFALO RUMBLINGS®
@BrianGalliford
by Brian Galliford on Sep 26, 2011 11:42 AM EDT reply actions
Not sure how I did that… I don’t have access to the numbers until after work.
I wasn't sure I was going to like the white helmets but seeing them in the practice footage, I've got to say that I love the look.
by Ron From NM on Sep 26, 2011 1:48 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Another extension
when does extending 27 year old Bell start to make more sense?
http://buffalopp.com
by buffalosportsfan on Sep 26, 2011 11:50 AM EDT reply actions
I don’t know, but if he reaches free agency I’d bet he’s gone. Someone will pay real good money for an average LT.
Question is
Do you start over at LT? I know they can draft one or whatever, but I guess it’s all $$$ possibly
http://buffalopp.com
by buffalosportsfan on Sep 26, 2011 12:22 PM EDT up reply actions
extending now may be pointless
correct me if I am wrong, but wasn’t Peters playing on an extension?
It seems to me that if Bell senses that he has value beyond his existing deal and that there is a market and he wants out of Buffalo, then he’ll pull a Jason Peters.
So it may just make sense to let the current deal play out and then pay him top dollar at a time when we are better able to gauge his mature value.
Yeah...
But some people aren’t douches.
Official ledge-talker-offer of the Buffalo Bills.
Citi Field loves the mets so much it smothers them. -the caveman
by WhyBillsWhy on Sep 26, 2011 6:54 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
I’m willing to bet that if the Bills have a very good season, you may see some players want to stay who might otherwise be more willing to leave for more $$.
That said, if RCW Jr. lowballs these players, we’ll see more leave than ought to happen.
Give a monkey a typewriter and infinite time, and he’ll eventually release Maybin. -- stetzwebs
No one circles the waiver wire like the Buffalo Bills!
by thefourwinds on Sep 26, 2011 9:47 PM EDT up reply actions
A great coach once said...
“It is not who you play but when you play them.” The Bills are riding high and NE had two secodary starters and Hayensworth out, also their defensive depth is lacking this year.
I believe that was a Bills coach who said it.
The Bills also had a starting CB, RG plus a WR and NT that typically see lots of playing time
11 years of losing has taught me just a smidge of humility. - k8
out
check out my music! http://prophetikmusic.net
LET GO BUFFALO ===== I AM A JEDI LIKE THE FATHER BEFORE ME ++++ IN BATTLE WE WILL SETTLE THIS - abayarde
by the_prophet on Sep 26, 2011 12:09 PM EDT up reply actions
I thought Bell played extremely well.
Despite NE missing a few linemen, they still have talented pass rushers all around, and I felt Bell pretty much held his own.
Yes
That was my impression also. I especially noticed his terrific run-blocking that was responsible for springing Fred Jackson on some of his bigger runs. While I very much appreciate the time Ron puts in on these posts, and especially the ancillary comments he includes about what he sees as he reviews the tape, I do wonder about his grading system. A “good” play in pass protection is effectively neutralizing a really strong pass rusher, not necessarily throwing him to the ground. A “decent” play is keeping him off the QB, even though he pushes you back into the pocket. A “bad” play in my book is losing containment.
by Macktruck on Sep 26, 2011 12:45 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
agree
No one can complain about having an full unit review from a humorous and talented writer like Ron, but the grading system turns vague subjective terms (good, decent, bad) into numbers.
Here’s Levitre’s pass grade:
Levitre, A. 1 43 0 0 0 0 75.6%
No sacks and no bad plays translates to 75.6%? I do know it’s hard to score into the mid-eighties, so that make a 90-100% grade virtually impossible….which leads to more confusion. Just my take. Glad to have a review to discuss at all!
Try to be informed, not just opinionated.
As has been discussed many times, it really just isolates the bad plays, which, on the pass rush, is all that really matters.
Give a monkey a typewriter and infinite time, and he’ll eventually release Maybin. -- stetzwebs
No one circles the waiver wire like the Buffalo Bills!
by thefourwinds on Sep 26, 2011 9:49 PM EDT up reply actions
I love these kinds of posts, Ron...
Keep up the good work!
Rinehart didn’t look all that bad in there this weekend, just goes to show that maybe Buffalo does have a little depth on the OL. Watching this offense is truly a treat right now. Nix and Gailey have really turned this team around and right from under our noses! Kudos to them for building a team and scheme that fits the talent of their players.
I was a little concerned about Rinehart I believe in the fourth quarter.
Those concerns shouldn’t be elevated to red flags. Each time I noticed that he may have gotten beat or pushed, the next play he would rebound. The penalty concerned me as often times it is a sign of mental weakness. If Rinehart was a weakness at all, the Pats would of picked up on it and exploited it. Still it was his first full game against a very good team and overall, they played better than last year. I still want Urbik to get healthy and fast. That depth we have on the interior is golden as long as they are all healthy. The tackles did good, Pears in Pass Protection was solid and Bell in run blocking was near excellent. A ton of good to take from yesterday’s performance.
YOU ARE OUT of you kuku fufu mine craker laker Flaber baber FUNKI chunki brain. WE want to winn every year -- abayarde
Don't be Mr. Negative, Ron.
Great write up on the line, as usual, Ron. Glad to see you manned up to admitting your negativity during the game. This team will not give up! You gotta Bill-eive!
The user formerly known as "PaperBagHeads."
"Nick Barnett is everywhere. He is behind you right now." -- Munchausen
by ChuckBuffInFlo on Sep 26, 2011 12:38 PM EDT reply actions
Excellent!
I had to listen on the radio (internet) but it seemed like there were a lot of early miscues by the OL in general (and I think Chandler had a hold early as well). Glad to see they were able to regroup and put up another very solid performance as a unit. Levitre so far has been amazing for us. Maybe the preseason “turmoil” helped light a fire under him, and maybe he’s still progressing as a young and very talented LG.
Ron – you were in doubt down 21 – 0? I don’t blame you there, but honestly this year, with this team, I didn’t worry about it too much. I never felt like the lead was insurmountable. Any time in the last 10 years I probably would have…
usual rec'd
just have to wonder how #22 would grade out in your system when left in to block. 28?
"Alright Men, lets go out there, bust um in the chops & get somebody bloody. Keep working hard till you get it right. Take the W in battle & make the Bills Nation Proud." coach Karma420
by Blood, sweat & Win on Sep 26, 2011 1:00 PM EDT reply actions
That's two good games and a passable game (this week) for Bell.
I’m still a big Bell doubter, but I have to admit he’s playing well. Even this week when he had 6 bad pass plays and a killed play versus no good plays, he still allowed no sacks and that’s the key stat for a LT’s pass blocking. And he run blocked extremely well.
I’ll put this in writing right here: If he can show through another three or so games that he’s as consistent as he’s been for these last three games, I’ll start to seriously shift my paradigm and say — he could be our guy.
Go Buffalo Bills, Utah Jazz, and Arkansas Razorbacks
Other blockers
I think it is pretty interesting how much the Bills use Chandler as a kickout blocker pulling across the formation. Also anyone else notice that both David Nelson and Donald Jones were used as lead blockers on different running plays?
when the bills win their first playoff game in ten plus yrs.
people will say, but the other team was missing 4 starters and 2 backups
and they threw 3 picks….
if it was not for that, we would not have won……
by simonpure on Sep 26, 2011 1:53 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Yup. Staying healthy has always been a huge part to having a big season. One cannot control all the factors that go into staying healthy, but the simple fact is a lot of teams have had huge seasons because the serious injuries to key personnel were limited throughout the season.
Give a monkey a typewriter and infinite time, and he’ll eventually release Maybin. -- stetzwebs
No one circles the waiver wire like the Buffalo Bills!
by thefourwinds on Sep 26, 2011 9:52 PM EDT up reply actions

































