State Of The Buffalo Bills Roster: Tight End
Buffalo Rumblings is in the process of breaking down the Buffalo Bills' roster position by position. Installments you may have missed: QB, RB, WR, OT.
For fleeting moments of the 2011 regular season, Scott Chandler made the tight end position relevant in Buffalo again. A long-defunct position - and that's saying something for a team that hasn't been to the playoffs in a dozen seasons - Chandler resuscitated a bit with what was, in the end, fairly meager production at the position.
Chandler's 38 receptions ranked him tied for No. 22 in the league among tight ends, tied with Jake Ballard of the New York Giants. His 389 yards placed him No. 27 overall in receiving yardage by a tight end. Touchdowns are where he really stood out, as he ranked tied for seventh with six scores despite otherwise low totals. All of those touchdowns came during the team's 5-2 start, including four in the first three games.
A closer look at the tight end position lies after the jump.
SCOTT CHANDLER
Age: 26 (27 in July 2012)
Contract: UNRESTRICTED FREE AGENT
Despite Chandler's best efforts - particularly in the red zone - it's clear that the tight end won't be prominently featured in a Chan Gailey offense unless a dynamic threat is acquired. Chandler is not dynamic - and coupled with his pedestrian reception and yardage totals, there's little wonder that GM Buddy Nix isn't willing to over-spend to retain Chandler's services. That said, Chandler was also a consistent and reliable receiving target in 2011, and is, quite simply, a good football player. Unless he gets a lot of interest elsewhere - and that's somewhat difficult to envision - it's not hard to imagine the Bills re-signing Chandler to a reasonable deal.
LEE SMITH
Age: 24 (25 in November 2012)
Contract: UFA in 2015. Bills took on a four-year, $2.29M contract in claiming him off waivers from New England.
Smith is more of the prototype tight end insofar as what Nix and Gailey seem to prefer at the position: a massive, nasty blocker. If you haven't yet, take the time to watch Smith play - he's constantly needling opponents and getting under their skin. It's been a while since the Bills have had a player like that. He's highly one-dimensional in that he won't add anything as a receiver, but Smith is already a good blocker with the potential to get better.
MIKE CAUSSIN
Age: 24 (25 in February 2012)
Contract: Contract details undisclosed. Signed off of the team's practice squad in November.
Caussin spent most of the season on the practice squad, then was added to the active roster when the injury bug bit the position. He stayed there even with the Bills having just two tight ends on the active roster. When he played, he saw a few passes thrown his way, and was fairly lights out on special teams. After two years in the organization, however, it's tough to see much upside here.
KEVIN BROCK
Age: 25 (26 in April 2012)
Contract: Contract details undisclosed. Signed off of the team's practice squad in December.
Brock flashed briefly at the end of the season when pressed into action, and could get a chance to compete at the position if brought back for training camp this summer. He's more of a receiver than a blocker.
FENDI ONOBUN
Age: 25 (26 in November 2012)
Contract: Contract details undisclosed. Signed off of the Jaguars' practice squad in December.
Onobun was signed directly to the Bills' active roster off of Jacksonville's practice squad, but was never active on game day for the Bills. The former basketball player at Arizona is an excellent athlete, but hasn't been able to stick with a team for long as a project tight end. He'll likely be back for a longer look in training camp now that he's been in the offense for a while.
POSITIONAL OUTLOOK: Chandler made this position sporadically relevant again, which is why it's not surprising that the team wants him back. He fits into Gailey's offense as a secondary possession threat and a problem matchup in the red zone, but that's about the extent of his involvement in an ideal world. From there, the team's goals seem to be to find blockers and project receivers that they can try to mold into something better than what Chandler offers. For a position largely ignored, that's about as good as it's going to get on the scouting front.
FREE AGENCY: Re-signing Chandler won't be the team's top priority, but it'd be nice if they got him under contract. That way, the position won't be a complete wasteland from a pass-catching perspective. If they target a tight end in free agency, expect a project receiver or a sturdy blocker.
2012 NFL DRAFT: Let's talk about the draft in general for a minute. Unless the Bills were to stumble across a sure thing at tight end - a player whose receiving skills were so excellent that it'd be impossible to pass on him - it's tough to imagine this regime spending a premium pick on one. Gailey coached Tony Gonzalez's best season, but otherwise has ignored this position. That's likely to continue, with project receivers and blockers the focus. Nix has yet to draft a tight end in two drafts with the Bills.
33 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Chandler - not a vertical threat
His rankings amongst league TE’s paint that picture for us. Hes a big, slow body who is an average blocker – but this makes him a good red zone threat. I say we go out and get a hybrid TE who can really stretch the field! Go Goats!! Lets help out Fitz ehh?
The Buffalo Billy Goats .. and the Ice Goats
by BillyGoats_DC on Jan 11, 2012 10:05 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
Amazing
Chandler’s 38 receptions ranked him tied for No. 22 in the league among tight ends, tied with Jake Ballard of the New York Giants. His 389 yards placed him No. 27 overall in receiving yardage by a tight end.
Plus 11 catches for 79 yards from Caussin/Brock/Smith. We celebrate this as the best TE performance in years. Epitomizes why the Bills have missed the playoffs for over a decade now.
You are really dayig that because the Bills don’t use a TE they have not maid the playoffs. The Giants use a TE less and are good, I don’t think Denver has a TE, and Baltimore rarely uses theres. What are you trying to say.
NElson....
I heard last season the Bills might try to bulk up Nelson to make him a TE. With a full offseason to prep do you think this is a possiblity?
No - he doesn't have the frame to hold it
by BuffaloFanFromCT on Jan 11, 2012 10:30 AM EST up reply actions
agree
he could maybe get himself to 230… which i almost think he SHOULD do… if he wouldn’t probably lose speed, where he is barely fast enough anyway. He could definitely still benefit from a few pounds, because he is a bit lanky. If he had even just a little more speed, he could be a GREAT receiver. I still think he is very good… but without being faster, he will never be what Vincent Jackson is. Otherwise, he has the size you want, the hands you want, a high character guy, and really, the worst thing i can possibly say is he isn’t real fast. (same can be said for Roosevelt: but i don’t care. I think both these guys are too good not to use. I much rather see Roosevelt as the fourth WR- and be what Parrish probably won’t/can’t be. He isn’t as fast or shifty, but he is fast enough, averaged near 20 yards on every catch, and has very good hands.)
ABAYARDE IS NOSTRADAMUS JUST WATCH WE WILL NOT YIEALD TO NOBODY YOUR SOUL WE WILL TAKE
by ThaRealTruth on Jan 11, 2012 5:16 PM EST up reply actions
Top teams have top TE's
All players on the field need to be a receiving threat. Look at the top teams in the NFL
Patriots – 2 freak TE’s
Saints – Freak TE
Packers – Athletic TE
Steelers – Well rounded TE
49ers – Freak TE
Teams without good TE’s:
Giants – run first w/ vertical passing game
Broncos – run first
Texans – run first
Ravens – run first
The identity of the Bills appears to be a spread / pass first offense similar to the Saints, Packers and Patriots where the pass opens up the run. Those teams have ELITE TE’s that double as a receiver & blocker. I think they are trying to fill that need with Onobon but he hasn’t seen gametime yet so we don’t know what he can do. Having a TE that can bounce out for a TE screen or seam route AND stay in to block some downs, would go a LONG way in what the Bills could do with their spread scheme…
Of course those teams that run the spread typically have ELITE QB’s that can distribute the ball as well….
by BuffaloFanFromCT on Jan 11, 2012 10:37 AM EST reply actions
I would say that the texans, and Giants both have good TE’s w/ Daniels and Boss respectively.
Also Graham, Hernandez and Finley are crap blockers. They are all receivers mainly and block in name only.
But I do agree with your point that we need a big guy who causes matchup problems for the defense… too fast for a LB and too big for a DB
Boss is a Raider. The Giants’ tight end is Ballard.
Editor-in-Chief, BUFFALO RUMBLINGS®
Follow @BrianGalliford
by Brian Galliford on Jan 11, 2012 11:01 AM EST up reply actions
Your main point is good, but
The Giants are clearly a pass first team now, and they get along just fine at TE. And their best pass catching back would be our third best.
The Texans are run first and have Owen Daniels who’s one of the better vertical threat TE’s in the league
The Steelers barely use Heath Miller. He’s a great player, but he doesn’t put up much in the way of numbers, though it seems its because of their blocking issues. They need that extra body on the line
You do need multiple receiving threats to run a spread type offense, but one of them doesn’t have to be a TE. If Jimmy Graham went down, the Saints offense would barely miss a beat since they have receiving depth.
I don’t think the Bills are necessarily a spread team. They SHOULD be a balanced offense. The problem is they have played from behind way too much.
Alex Smith is now elite?
But I agree we need a better TE who can block and catch. I’m actually looking forward to a Bills offense with Fitz, Stevie, Easley, Nelson, FredEx and new TE. That would be a lot of receiving threats.
What Scott needs to do
Is watch the Pittsburgh vs Denver game and take note of how Heath Miller plays the game. This my friends is what a great TE looks like, his blocking skills are incredible. He is the biggest reason Isaac Redman had such a great game, securing the key blocks off the edges. If Scott could learn to block like Heath Miller, he’d be a Bill for a very long time!
Rebuilding a team properly takes time and patience
Even if we keep Chandler, which I think we should/will...
I want them to target Cody Fleener in the 2nd round. We’ve seen what big, TE’s have done in this league. Some of the best “receivers” are Tight Ends, Gates, Gonzalez, Graham, Gronk, Hernandez, Finley, etc…
I hate that I love Buffalo.
Tight End the Trend
As the NFL becomes more and more of a passing league, big, athletic TE’s have come to play an increasingly prominent role in offensive schemes. Just think of all the TE’s who have done major damage to the Bills over the last few years. If it is true that Nix and Gailey don’t believe in taking advantage of such players, then they are hopelessly out of date and will be consigning the Bills to continuing mediocrity. The fact that we don’t have a dynamic pass-catching TE like Gronko or Jason Witten makes it that much easier for opposing defenses to contain our offense. If Buddy and Chan haven’t figured that out, it’s time for them to wake up.
by Macktruck on Jan 11, 2012 11:27 AM EST reply actions 2 recs
The great mystery
We have had some solid tight ends over the years — Keith McKellar, Mark Brammer, and Pete Metzelaars. However, over the past decade, regardless of who was calling the plays, it seems like the Bills have gone out of their way to avoid throwing to a tight end. When you look around the league, you see guys like Tony Gonzales, Antonio Gates, Vernon Davis, Rob Gronkowski, etc. These are guys who, while not as fast as a typical wide receiver, can create ridiculous mismatches when you try to cover them with a linebacker or safety. I am simply amazed by the Bills’ perpetual unwillingness to find a receiving tight end and actually throw to him. Chandler, while effective early on this year, was almost always an outlet valve, not the primary target on the play. It seemed like some of the red zone plays targeted him, but then they went away from that as the year wore on.
by SiriusRed on Jan 11, 2012 11:31 AM EST via mobile reply actions
The article is correct in pointing out Buffalo’s lack of emphasis on the tight end position. From Gailey not featuring one to Nix not drafting one, from Wilson never employing one beter than Warlick or Metzelaars, the Bills have a long storied history of downplaying the position. That being said, as passing attacks continue to evolve to take advantage of Goodell’s fantasy football rules, the tight end posuition has exploded into prominence. Buffalo needs to re-think their opinion of the tight end position or face legitimate scrutiny should the current trend continue into 2012 and beyond. If Buffalo’s braintrust proves to be an era behind the curve, they deserve to be run out of town. Time will tell, but I agree with the article that Buffalo is unlikely to look for impact at the position yet again.
"There's only one C.J. Spiller." -Buddy Nix
The issue I have...
Yes, stats don’t lie and Chandler only came in at #22 in TE receptions. Got it. But factor in that for most of the season Chan really only utilized him in red zone situations, and Chandler did miss some time due to injury. What I liked seeing was that Chan did start using Chandler more outside of the red zone towards the end of the season.
Chandler isn’t the elite TE that’s going to dominate a game. However, he is still a big target with good hands that the Bills can throw to in critical situations. So the way I look at it, so what if he’s not going to be the threat who will regularly run that 20+ yd seam rt? I’ll take his size and hands camping just beyond the 1st down mark for Fitz to go to when needed. Just my thoughts though.
What I liked seeing was that Chan did start using Chandler more outside of the red zone towards the end of the season.
I believe that you’re referring to a five-game stretch that occurred immediately after his two-touchdown performance against Washington (in which he had two catches for two scores). In those five games, he caught 20 passes for 227 yards. That’s an average of four catches for 57 yards per game.
Editor-in-Chief, BUFFALO RUMBLINGS®
Follow @BrianGalliford
by Brian Galliford on Jan 11, 2012 1:13 PM EST up reply actions
Brian, From another post
I have seen you note that you don’t like talking about FA at this point in the year, but it would be cool to see who the potential people on the market are at the positions that you cover in this segment
by fanick82 on Jan 11, 2012 6:17 PM EST reply actions 3 recs
i agree
that is actually an excellent idea. would require more effort, and such.. but when Brian gets around to comparing FAs that could be available later on… there would be a little more familiarity with them… IMO. Good idea, fanick82. recd
ABAYARDE IS NOSTRADAMUS JUST WATCH WE WILL NOT YIEALD TO NOBODY YOUR SOUL WE WILL TAKE
by ThaRealTruth on Jan 11, 2012 6:36 PM EST up reply actions
The missing piece?
Chan has repeatedly stated the Bills passing game opens up the running game.
I believe the Bills need a strong dual threat TE to help the run open up the pass. A strong dual threat TE gives the defense more to think about as he can effectively function as a pseudo lineman or pseudo wide receiver. The key words in that sentence are “strong” and “effectively”.
A strong dual purpose TE matched up with Stevie, Fred, CJ, and another top notch wideout would give defenses fits. Those 5 skill position players would include two strong pass blockers (Fred and hypothetical TE), two strong runners, 5 receivers, and a solid group of run blocking skill players. All in all, I have a hard time imagining a more versatile set of skill players should the Bills find the hypothetical “strong dual threat” TE and top notch wideout to accompany a yet to be re-signed Stevie.
by WhatGoesAround on Jan 11, 2012 11:19 PM EST reply actions
I kind of like Martellus Bennett
young and decent IMO will be breakout on a new team and Dallas is not expecting him back……of course Tony Gonzolez is FA again… How cool is that? Chandler like Stevie would look good with a good player on the other side of the line and Chan ought to copy the Cheaters*, It automatically opens up the run game and make the oline look better.
"God all-MIGHTY! God all-MIGHTY! Why do we DO that?!! God all-MIGHTY!!!" "Just keep matriculatin' the ball down the field, boys."
"We're at the crossroads...there's no doubt about that. But you can get it done...you can get it done...what's more you've GOT to get it done." Lou Saban
…of course Tony Gonzolez is FA again…
Gonzalez signed a one year extension to the tune of $7M.
.
When the job is finished no one remembers how long it took, just how well it was performed.
by Buffalo for Eternity on Jan 12, 2012 7:15 AM EST up reply actions

by 
































