Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: L'Equipe Claims He's Coming To Chelsea On Five Year Deal

Part of article/mailbag I'm referring to:

"Q: Can we say that a top running back is no longer needed to win a Super Bowl? Here are the last 10 Super Bowl winners and their running backs: 2001- Pats (Antowain Smith); 2002- Bucs (Michael Pittman); 2003- Pats (Kevin Faulk); 2004- Pats (Corey Dillon); 2005- Steelers (Willie Parker); 2006- Colts (Joseph Addai); 2007- Giants (Brandon Jacobs); 2008- Steelers (Willie Parker); 2009- Saints (Pierre Thomas); 2010- Packers (Brandon Jackson). Do any of those guys strike fear into your heart? Corey Dillon would be the closest (although he was past his prime when he joined the Pats). Also, the Colts, Giants, Saints, and Packers all won the Super Bowl AFTER losing Edgerrin James, Tiki Barber, Deuce McAllister, and Ryan Grant. Does this make the case that having a top running back, if you are a contender for the Super Bowl, actually hurts your chances?
— Brian R, Dubai

SG: In the Salary Cap/Touch Football era, I would say yes — you're better off having multiple cost-effective backs who can do different things (like how New Orleans uses Chris Ivory, Pierre Thomas and Darren Sproles) over one expensive back (say, Chris Johnson or Adrian Peterson). Our three best 2011 offenses (New Orleans, Green Bay and New England) certainly embraced that philosophy.1 For a 20-game season (including playoffs), would you rather have a quality running back by committee (say, Thomas, Sproles, Ivory and Mark Ingram) or a super-back like Ray Rice for twice the price? For one game, you might take Rice — he can do everything that committee can do. But for five solid months with the injury factor included? You might take the committee, right?"

4 months ago Mcshay-kiper_tiny jmkney 11 comments 0 recs  | 

Story-email Email Printer Print

Comments

Display:

I’d rather have 1 RB and re-sign Stevie than have Brad Smith be the #1 WR. Re-signing Stevie also makes WR much less of a need come draft time so BPA and players that fit needs can be drafted before a WR.

Spiller-Stevie-Drafting Upshaw(just gonna go with popularity on this one) looks much better than
Spiller-Jackson-Floyd, Jeffrey, Wright etc.

I’m fine with Freddie returning, as long as Stevie is as well

Kenny Powers is back!

by atlantalove on Jan 18, 2012 10:39 PM EST reply actions  

It really should be a no-brainer

Fred isn’t even a free agent this season. He just has earned an extension.
Stevie should be the number 1 target for Buffalo – period. The only one who comes close is Demetrius Bell, because when he isn’t injured he is a top 15 LT. But as you said, if we lose Stevie our WR depth is nil.

"Give a monkey a typewriter and infinite time, and he’ll eventually release Maybin." - stetzwebs

by DanRoc on Jan 19, 2012 12:59 AM EST up reply actions  

In the words of Seth Myers and Amy Poehler
The only one who comes close is Demetrius Bell, because when he isn’t injured he is a top 15 LT

Really?

Girls use hair spray, Men don't.

DO YOURSELF A FAVOR AND GROW UP BY NOT USING HAIRSPRAY MALES!

Don't be a Paully!

by The Buffalo Kid on Jan 19, 2012 8:29 AM EST up reply actions  

No Brainer

But does OBD have a brain as signings and drafts have gone? Not so sure. This team is hard to figure out :).

The Sum Of A Franchise Is Directly Proportionate To The Talent Of Franchise's QB. Get A QB OBD!

by buffalobacker on Jan 20, 2012 9:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Depends on how much Freddy wants to sign for. If he wants true market price then no. I would rather invest that money else where. If hes willing to see the risk in resigning him or take a home team discount then yes absolutely. It all depends on how much Freddy wants

by billsstein on Jan 18, 2012 11:49 PM EST reply actions  

We broke the bank........

When we drafted Spiller.

At least he finally started looking like an NFL running back last year.

Girls use hair spray, Men don't.

DO YOURSELF A FAVOR AND GROW UP BY NOT USING HAIRSPRAY MALES!

Don't be a Paully!

by The Buffalo Kid on Jan 19, 2012 8:31 AM EST reply actions  

well

i think we would be in better shape to sing fred and be more of a power running team, if we ran the ball 30 times a game. give fred 20 and cj 10 or vise versa, we would be a better team offensevely

by Kgun81 on Jan 19, 2012 8:36 AM EST reply actions  

I agree

But I think Chan is just not capable of sticking with the run to get them that many carries. There were plenty of games he abandoned the run with a tie score to a 1 score lead, let’s hope an old dog can learn a new trick.

Girls use hair spray, Men don't.

DO YOURSELF A FAVOR AND GROW UP BY NOT USING HAIRSPRAY MALES!

Don't be a Paully!

by The Buffalo Kid on Jan 19, 2012 8:42 AM EST up reply actions  

The Buffalo Bills Should Be A Run-First Team

I know that is in direct conflict with Chan’s philosophy, but I don’t understand why. Chan is supposed to be known for designing offensive schemes that highlight the talents of his specific players. Now, to some extent, I believe he has done that. But I also think he is missing something that, to me, is blatantly obvious. The Buffalo Bills have more running threats than passing threats. Think about it:

1) The Bills have a power runner in Fred Jackson and a speed runner in CJ Spiller. Both deserve 25 carries a game at least. So give it to them both! Keep offenses guessing about how and where the ball is going to be run, but run often. Pound and punish defenses with Fred and have CJ burn them wish speed.

2) The Bills have a fast, versatile, and dangerous player in Brad Smith. He has speed to run, but can also throw. Our 3rd down conversion percentage was much higher when Smith was running from the Wildcat. In 2012, Gailey should run Wildcat formations with both Fred and CJ on the field as well. This would be a nightmare for defenses. Smith could run himself or handoff to either option. Defenses would never know what’s coming. And, on top of that, Smith could still throw (and should throw short passes from time to time) to Fred, CJ, or any open receiver. Why Chan has not done this already confuses me. Defenses would have no way to know what to expect from the Wildcat, as opposed to this season, when it always meant a run up the gut.

3) Fitz has definitely shown us magic, but cannot consistently win us games with his arm. Why not run the ball often with a dynamic and versatile set of running tools, and then slip in a quick slant or a deep throw at unexpected times. I believe this would make Fitz much more effective. He would throw less, but would have a higher completion percentage and fewer interceptions because defenses wouldn’t expect his throws.

The Bills offense has some of the best running talent in the NFL. I suggest we use it to its full potential in 2012!

"The Amish Rifle is your god now." - Muzza34

by BuffaloOwdaTwnr on Jan 19, 2012 12:38 PM EST reply actions   1 recs

Jacobs, Addai, and Parker

I would all consider top tier running backs. So if you look at it that way, its 4out of 10, which means its a crapshoot. which is why they play the game.

by NHBillzFan on Jan 19, 2012 12:47 PM EST reply actions  

Interesting article, that I feel somehow relates to this topic:

http://www.nationalfootballpost.com/Backs-in-Action.html

I’m starting to wonder if they don’t re-work Jackson’s contract this coming year and franchise tag him next year, paying him at or near the top of the RB class for one season. It wouldn’t surprise me. Jackson gets a nice, though short payday, and the Bills don’t find themselves bound to a long top-heavy contract.

I don’t think it’s fair to Jackson, but I can see this scenario playing out.

"Go check on the ribs!"

by TheAfghanTwilight on Jan 19, 2012 3:46 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

SB Nation's home for all things Buffalo Bills.
Community Guidelines :: Essential BR

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
The Return of the Running Back(s): Revisiting the Road to the Super Bowl
Bills_small
An Exploration of Ryan Fitzpatrick's TDs and INTs
Small
Beyond the Perfect Offseason: Where Do We Go From Here?
Dsc00843_small
NFL Divisional Record And Playoff Berth Correlation, 2002-2011

Recent FanPosts

Small
Who Will be the Number 2?
Spikes_small
Remaining Free Agents
04_buffalo_bills_football_coloring_at_coloring-pages-book-for-kids-boys_small
Mock 2012 Season
Small
Difference Between A "Franchise" QB and an "Elite" One
303857_872291743296_10504698_40499694_6362492_n_small
Be A Little Nicer Please, Bills Fans  :)
Cyclops1-12nd7cv_small
Current QB Wins
Small
The Count-Down to the Right Numbers
Bruuuuce_small
Ranking All 32 NFL Starting QB's : Who is ELITE?
Snapshot_20120113_small
Next Stop: 3rd Generation of Winners

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Screen_shot_2012-03-07_at_6 Brian Galliford

100_2488_small MattRichWarren

Authors

Range_march_2011_small Ron From NM

Slide1_small Der Jaeger

Moderators

Sucks_small Kurupt

Mrsinister03_small sireric

Cordy_small poz