RB by Committee - Case Closed - Keep Fred & CJ but break the bank for no one
Part of article/mailbag I'm referring to:
"Q: Can we say that a top running back is no longer needed to win a Super Bowl? Here are the last 10 Super Bowl winners and their running backs: 2001- Pats (Antowain Smith); 2002- Bucs (Michael Pittman); 2003- Pats (Kevin Faulk); 2004- Pats (Corey Dillon); 2005- Steelers (Willie Parker); 2006- Colts (Joseph Addai); 2007- Giants (Brandon Jacobs); 2008- Steelers (Willie Parker); 2009- Saints (Pierre Thomas); 2010- Packers (Brandon Jackson). Do any of those guys strike fear into your heart? Corey Dillon would be the closest (although he was past his prime when he joined the Pats). Also, the Colts, Giants, Saints, and Packers all won the Super Bowl AFTER losing Edgerrin James, Tiki Barber, Deuce McAllister, and Ryan Grant. Does this make the case that having a top running back, if you are a contender for the Super Bowl, actually hurts your chances?
— Brian R, Dubai
SG: In the Salary Cap/Touch Football era, I would say yes — you're better off having multiple cost-effective backs who can do different things (like how New Orleans uses Chris Ivory, Pierre Thomas and Darren Sproles) over one expensive back (say, Chris Johnson or Adrian Peterson). Our three best 2011 offenses (New Orleans, Green Bay and New England) certainly embraced that philosophy.1 For a 20-game season (including playoffs), would you rather have a quality running back by committee (say, Thomas, Sproles, Ivory and Mark Ingram) or a super-back like Ray Rice for twice the price? For one game, you might take Rice — he can do everything that committee can do. But for five solid months with the injury factor included? You might take the committee, right?"
4 months ago
jmkney
11 comments
0 recs |
Comments
I’d rather have 1 RB and re-sign Stevie than have Brad Smith be the #1 WR. Re-signing Stevie also makes WR much less of a need come draft time so BPA and players that fit needs can be drafted before a WR.
Spiller-Stevie-Drafting Upshaw(just gonna go with popularity on this one) looks much better than
Spiller-Jackson-Floyd, Jeffrey, Wright etc.
I’m fine with Freddie returning, as long as Stevie is as well
Kenny Powers is back!
It really should be a no-brainer
Fred isn’t even a free agent this season. He just has earned an extension.
Stevie should be the number 1 target for Buffalo – period. The only one who comes close is Demetrius Bell, because when he isn’t injured he is a top 15 LT. But as you said, if we lose Stevie our WR depth is nil.
"Give a monkey a typewriter and infinite time, and he’ll eventually release Maybin." - stetzwebs
In the words of Seth Myers and Amy Poehler
The only one who comes close is Demetrius Bell, because when he isn’t injured he is a top 15 LT
Really?
Girls use hair spray, Men don't.
DO YOURSELF A FAVOR AND GROW UP BY NOT USING HAIRSPRAY MALES!
Don't be a Paully!
by The Buffalo Kid on Jan 19, 2012 8:29 AM EST up reply actions
No Brainer
But does OBD have a brain as signings and drafts have gone? Not so sure. This team is hard to figure out :).
The Sum Of A Franchise Is Directly Proportionate To The Talent Of Franchise's QB. Get A QB OBD!
by buffalobacker on Jan 20, 2012 9:11 PM EST up reply actions
We broke the bank........
When we drafted Spiller.
At least he finally started looking like an NFL running back last year.
Girls use hair spray, Men don't.
DO YOURSELF A FAVOR AND GROW UP BY NOT USING HAIRSPRAY MALES!
Don't be a Paully!
by The Buffalo Kid on Jan 19, 2012 8:31 AM EST reply actions
well
i think we would be in better shape to sing fred and be more of a power running team, if we ran the ball 30 times a game. give fred 20 and cj 10 or vise versa, we would be a better team offensevely
I agree
But I think Chan is just not capable of sticking with the run to get them that many carries. There were plenty of games he abandoned the run with a tie score to a 1 score lead, let’s hope an old dog can learn a new trick.
Girls use hair spray, Men don't.
DO YOURSELF A FAVOR AND GROW UP BY NOT USING HAIRSPRAY MALES!
Don't be a Paully!
by The Buffalo Kid on Jan 19, 2012 8:42 AM EST up reply actions
The Buffalo Bills Should Be A Run-First Team
I know that is in direct conflict with Chan’s philosophy, but I don’t understand why. Chan is supposed to be known for designing offensive schemes that highlight the talents of his specific players. Now, to some extent, I believe he has done that. But I also think he is missing something that, to me, is blatantly obvious. The Buffalo Bills have more running threats than passing threats. Think about it:
1) The Bills have a power runner in Fred Jackson and a speed runner in CJ Spiller. Both deserve 25 carries a game at least. So give it to them both! Keep offenses guessing about how and where the ball is going to be run, but run often. Pound and punish defenses with Fred and have CJ burn them wish speed.
2) The Bills have a fast, versatile, and dangerous player in Brad Smith. He has speed to run, but can also throw. Our 3rd down conversion percentage was much higher when Smith was running from the Wildcat. In 2012, Gailey should run Wildcat formations with both Fred and CJ on the field as well. This would be a nightmare for defenses. Smith could run himself or handoff to either option. Defenses would never know what’s coming. And, on top of that, Smith could still throw (and should throw short passes from time to time) to Fred, CJ, or any open receiver. Why Chan has not done this already confuses me. Defenses would have no way to know what to expect from the Wildcat, as opposed to this season, when it always meant a run up the gut.
3) Fitz has definitely shown us magic, but cannot consistently win us games with his arm. Why not run the ball often with a dynamic and versatile set of running tools, and then slip in a quick slant or a deep throw at unexpected times. I believe this would make Fitz much more effective. He would throw less, but would have a higher completion percentage and fewer interceptions because defenses wouldn’t expect his throws.
The Bills offense has some of the best running talent in the NFL. I suggest we use it to its full potential in 2012!
"The Amish Rifle is your god now." - Muzza34
by BuffaloOwdaTwnr on Jan 19, 2012 12:38 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
Jacobs, Addai, and Parker
I would all consider top tier running backs. So if you look at it that way, its 4out of 10, which means its a crapshoot. which is why they play the game.
Interesting article, that I feel somehow relates to this topic:
http://www.nationalfootballpost.com/Backs-in-Action.html
I’m starting to wonder if they don’t re-work Jackson’s contract this coming year and franchise tag him next year, paying him at or near the top of the RB class for one season. It wouldn’t surprise me. Jackson gets a nice, though short payday, and the Bills don’t find themselves bound to a long top-heavy contract.
I don’t think it’s fair to Jackson, but I can see this scenario playing out.
"Go check on the ribs!"
by TheAfghanTwilight on Jan 19, 2012 3:46 PM EST reply actions





























