Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: NFL Safety Ryan Clark's Motivational Workout

Morning Joe! Kicker and a Punter; really?

Good morning Bills Nation,

This is the third rendition of Morning Joe, and to my surprise and delight it's been quite successful. We've had some great conversations and insightful ideas. I look forward to seeing more well thought out arguments and discussions; so relax; kick your feet up and enjoy your Morning Joe!

In today's addition of Morning Joe, I will be discussing the "perceived need" to have both a Kicker and Punter on an NFL roster. After watching last nights game; no one can argue that a reliable Kicker is a great asset to have in today's NFL game. We've seen great kickers literally win Super Bowls for teams (Adam Vinateri) and we've seen kickers lose Super Bowls (He" Whose Name Shall Not Be Mentioned"). So the problem that I have is with the Punter position. Very rarely does a punter have the same impact on the outcome of the game. Now before the football purest attack this point, by telling me the importance of field position and long drives by the opposing offense, take the time to read some of my points after the jump. I will love to hear your argument on the matter then.

Star-divide

After training camp and NFL roster is only limited to 53 Players and on game day is limited to 46. That typically leaves you with a combination of 43 offensive and defensive players; with three specialist (Kicker, Punter, and Long Snapper). These are three positions that are going be set for all NFL teams going in to game day. Now for the life of me, I can't understand why NFL teams continue to waist valuable roster spots and money with players that are just limited to one thing and for the most part they can't even do that one thing exceptionally well.

Okay, so let me give you some facts. According to this Sports Illustrated article Chris Kluwe is the highest paid punter at about $5mil a year, this passed season he had a Net Avg of 38 yards per game and of his 77 punts he only had 22 punts that was downed inside the 20 (28%). This ranks him 19th in the league in punts downed inside the 20 and 26th in the league in Net Avg. Keep in mind he played 10 games in a Dome this year, and played the first game of the season in San Diego. Now you can make an argument for Chris Kluwe and say "well his team never moved the ball, so thats why he didn't have more kicks downed inside the 20" or you can say "the Vikings coverage team was bad all year and that's why is average was low". Now if you make these arguments, you pretty much proved my point. Why use a roster spot or spend money, on a player who's total success depends solely on the efforts of other players? What good is having a "specialist", who is not really all that special? Why cut a guy like Joique Bell or Robert Eddins for a punter?

I hate to attack Chris Kluwe because I'm sure he's a great guy, but lets look at this a little more closely. Kluwe averages about 4.8 punts a game. What if I told you he got paid $65,000 per punt ($5 mil / 77punts) and of the punts you really care about (punts inside the 20); he got paid $227,000 per punt ($5 mil / 22punts), which is about 1.3 a game. Now based on some of the discussions on this site; Bills fans are usually credited with being knowledgable fans. So would you pay $227,000 for one kick inside the 20 for each game of the season? Quite honestly, for that much money I need at least 80% of his kicks inside the 20, not 28%.

Now if you read any of the Morning Joe's; I'm not the one to complain and not provide you with a valid alternative.

Alternative: Let the Kicker punt. It's as simple as that. There is no reason why your Kicker shouldn't be able to both punt and kick. Yes, I understand its a different skill set but it's a skill set that can be taught and learned over a period of time. If your kicker can put the ball an average of 40-45 yards, he's good enough to punt in this league. That would put him amongst the average kickers in the league. At 4.85 mil a season, Raiders Kicker Sebastian Janikowski needs to be punting PERIOD.

With more and more players getting hurt and going on IR, teams need to start taking a closer look at this. It will be great chance to retain some of those training camp "diamonds". So am I alone on this one? I'll love to get your thoughts. Have at it.

Just another great fan opinion shared on the pages of BuffaloRumblings.com.

Comment 25 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

More from Buffalo Rumblings

Comments

Display:

An interesting standpoint.

We did see Moorman do well on kickoffs in a breif appearance this year. It makes you wonder if there is a need for two.

I would say yes. Field position is such an important part of the game. The 49ers stayed in that game because their punter would flip the field at crucial times. I’m not sure if I would be willing to sacrifice an accurate/strong kicker and punter for someone that is mediocre at one or both spots.

Shun the non Billievers!

by Superduff on Jan 23, 2012 9:31 AM EST reply actions  

How many accurate/strong punters are out there?

Lets say you have 10 high quality; top tier punters out there. That means the rest are in your words “mediocre”. If you know that you don’t have a “game changer” at the position, why settle for a mediocre punter. Let your kicker punt; can he do any worse than your mediocre kicker? Or if I’m the Packers or the Saints who move the ball up and down the field at will; I don’t necessarily need a great punter. Instead, I can get an extra weapon for Rogers or an extra pass rusher.

by doctork44 on Jan 23, 2012 10:26 AM EST up reply actions  

Yup........

And I would also add to your comment that Baltimore’s punter put them in a lot of bad situations with less than stellar punts to the Hoodies.

"My new cat just farted on my lap. Smells like Bills football." BG.

by SERGEANT MAJOR THOR on Jan 23, 2012 6:30 PM EST up reply actions  

Here's my argument against having your kicker, punt

What happens when your Kicker/Punter gets injured mid game?

flayed ones stealth mode

"Fleshling! Do not shoot! For I am one of you fleshy things. It is I. Your Uncle Stan. Can't you tell by the long strips of fleshy substances covered in bodily fluids? Trust me! I have fleeeeeeeeesh."

by mob16151 on Jan 23, 2012 10:01 AM EST reply actions   1 recs

Well you're screwed

If the argument is that a kicker can’t punt or a punter can’t kick…so it doesn’t matter if one gets injured, because the other can’t back up the other one.

by doctork44 on Jan 23, 2012 10:20 AM EST reply actions  

If the argument is that a kicker can’t punt or a punter can’t kick

You’re missing an important piece of the argument. Yes, one can do the duties in an emergency, but do you really want the emergency guy doing the entire rest of the season? That’s like saying when Fred Jackson was the Bills’ emergency QB (under those rules) that you’d be as comfortable with him being the starting QB for the rest of the season if he ever had to go into one game.

Give a monkey a typewriter and infinite time, and he’ll eventually release Maybin. -- stetzwebs
No one circles the waiver wire like the Buffalo Bills!

by thefourwinds on Jan 23, 2012 11:40 AM EST up reply actions  

No, you should just go get another kicker/punter

If you’ve been a kicker since college, explain to me why you won’t try to make yourself more valuable by also punting. It will seem to me that you will try to appeal to teams by giving them that extra options. Why limit yourself to just kicking?

by doctork44 on Jan 23, 2012 12:00 PM EST up reply actions  

I was more thinking

your punter/kicker gets hurt at half time, and at the end of the hame your down by 2, and need a 35 yard field goal to win it. I’d be much happier trotting out the other kicking specialist to try that, then random positional player A. But f you have one guy who does both, you don’t have that luxury.

flayed ones stealth mode

"Fleshling! Do not shoot! For I am one of you fleshy things. It is I. Your Uncle Stan. Can't you tell by the long strips of fleshy substances covered in bodily fluids? Trust me! I have fleeeeeeeeesh."

by mob16151 on Jan 24, 2012 1:26 AM EST up reply actions  

There is one thing you’re missing about this – the toll these duties take on the leg. If you assume that the PK is the more important piece, why would you want him ruining his leg over the course of a season (and shortening his career as well) by doing the punting too. That alone is enough to make me want a punter specialist.

You also are assuming every PK can punt with the same consistency that the punters do. The aftereffects of a bad shank can be disastrous. Just look at what happened when Raynor shanked that kickoff this season. Shanked punts can be just as disastrous. It’s a lot harder to be consistently decent than you’re assuming.

No, IMO, there’s no way in the game today that a team could get away with not having a PK and a P (specialists). Same thing goes with LS – you just don’t realize how specialized the skill is to do consistently well so that even your bad days don’t have a horrendous effect on the team.

Now, I’ll add this caveat. If the NFL did away with kickoffs, I might be willing to back you up, at least because it wouldn’t be as hard on the player’s leg.

Give a monkey a typewriter and infinite time, and he’ll eventually release Maybin. -- stetzwebs
No one circles the waiver wire like the Buffalo Bills!

by thefourwinds on Jan 23, 2012 11:38 AM EST reply actions   1 recs

The argument of consistence can be debated

I don’t agree that punters as a whole are consistent at all. The shanks are one thing, but the failed attempts to down the ball inside the 20 is ridiculous. If there are 10 top tiered kickers in the league, that means there are 22 who aren’t

Now I can see the argument of the “wear and tear” of a kickers leg, but the fact that these kickers are kicking at 43 and some case 50 years old, this tells me that these guys can take a little bit more pounding

by doctork44 on Jan 23, 2012 12:00 PM EST reply actions  

I guess my argument is this. A good punter is a good punter, and if you have a really good one then you are at an advantage. But if you have a mediocre punter, then you can substitute his production with someone else; your Kicker.

by doctork44 on Jan 23, 2012 12:10 PM EST reply actions  

If i remember correctly the falcons tried this

And lasted all of a year

With the first pick in the 2012 draft the Indianapolis Colts select Robert Griffen III

by Gpluehri on Jan 23, 2012 12:58 PM EST via mobile reply actions  

Well the league is always evolving

I can really see this happening in the near future. As offenses continue to improve and defenses continue to be limited in the level of physicality on Sunday’s, the need for the punter will become obsolete.

Coaches like Belicheck and Peyton have the foresight to see things like this. Who would have ever thought you can get to a Super Bowl with just a slot WR and two TE’s??

by doctork44 on Jan 23, 2012 1:32 PM EST up reply actions  

IMO, the only way this happens is if the NFL does away with kickoffs.

Give a monkey a typewriter and infinite time, and he’ll eventually release Maybin. -- stetzwebs
No one circles the waiver wire like the Buffalo Bills!

by thefourwinds on Jan 23, 2012 3:20 PM EST up reply actions  

I love this

and have been wondering this myself for years. I would even go so far to throw in long snapper, i dont understand why you cant get a backup TE to do the longsnapping. That is cutting two spots for skill players (just one punter/kicker and the TE or someone longsnapping).

If i had a kid who was in college and was a kicker or punter, i would have him practicing both every day to revolutionize the position.

If Tom Brady can punt one 40 yards, why cant a kicker? Doesn Randall Cunningham own the record for longest punt ever? If QB’s can do it in tricky situations, like on a 3rd and long, maybe this might start happening more often to control the field position game? there are certainly other alternitives and i agree with this 100%

by NHBillzFan on Jan 23, 2012 1:40 PM EST reply actions  

Different Muscles

I think place kickers and punters use a different set of leg muscles to kick. Yeah, it’s the same leg, but do sprinters do long distance well? Slalom skiers don’t do cross country. Of course, the idea is intriguing enough to consider the exception. Soccer players? They run and kick. But even then, the goalie does the long down field kicks and the forwards kick for accuracy. I’m thinking you probably could find the exception (i.e. a Bo Jackson type) who is athletic to do both, but most will not fall into that category.

Go big or go home.

by jackkemp15 on Jan 23, 2012 2:13 PM EST reply actions  

Why can’t the league just increase the number of the active roster? I’ve been saying it for years now, the roster limit is way too low, and forces too many teams to cut guys they’d like to keep, especially when injuries start, and those guys could be useful. It’s a shame to see the chaos that happens because your center and backup both get hurt, and you’re left scrambling. Not to mention all the poaching of good players that happens. In this day and age, the roster limit needs to be upped by about 8 so that injuries and personnel decisions don’t dramatically alter the landscape of the league. Worthless argument I guess, but that doesn’t mean I’m not right.

by BuffaloRepresent on Jan 23, 2012 2:55 PM EST reply actions  

I agree here. Roster limits that low are silly.

Give a monkey a typewriter and infinite time, and he’ll eventually release Maybin. -- stetzwebs
No one circles the waiver wire like the Buffalo Bills!

by thefourwinds on Jan 23, 2012 3:23 PM EST up reply actions  

NFL teams are very smart to have the positions of punter and probably even long snapper specialized. The difference in net punting yardage between the best and worst teams last year was 10 yards per punt. Even if you’re only thinking there will be a 3ish yard drop off in that stat by letting your kicker punt, with an average of 5 punts per game, you’re still talking about enough of a difference to warrant a roster spot. I wouldn’t advocate paying a punter, especially a non-special player (ie: Shane Lechler is incredible) upwards of 5 mil. But how are you doing better with a couple mil and a 45th/53rd roster spot than 15 or more yards per game? It may not seem like much, but is a backup linebacker or offensive lineman going to be that kind of a difference maker over the course of a season?

There is just too much value in that extra yardage you get from a punter who can boot it a little further, a little higher, avoid shanks and blocks a little better, place the ball inside the 20 a little better and direct punts out of bounds a little better for an NFL team to really consider using the roster spot in a different way.

"You mean @TWHITNER. It’s how he prefers to be referenced." - Jon Harrington

by kaisertown on Jan 23, 2012 2:56 PM EST reply actions   4 recs

Rec’d again, and the same would be true for the long snapper. The impact of a mistake on a long snap (punt, FG or PAT try) is huge.

Give a monkey a typewriter and infinite time, and he’ll eventually release Maybin. -- stetzwebs
No one circles the waiver wire like the Buffalo Bills!

by thefourwinds on Jan 23, 2012 3:25 PM EST up reply actions  

I get all of you guys points

However, this isn’t happening. Yes, if you got a guy like Lechler then I can see the argument…But over 2/3 of the punters in this league are nowhere near as effective than Lechler.

Okay, let me put it like this. A team like the Saints was one of the top offenses in the league this year, correct? Take a guess how many times their punter punted this past season. 46 times in 16 games. When you have an offense like the Saints, Packers (55 punts), New England (57 punts), you don’t really need a punter. The Saints punter punted 2.8 times per game…So I just don’t understand why you need a guy that’s only going to give you 3 plays a game.

I rather cross train my kicker, or the last guy on the bench to handle this duty. 5-15 yards a game is worth it to me, that equates to one holding or personal foul penalty. If your team cut back on those penalties, you can afford to drop your punter.

by doctork44 on Jan 23, 2012 4:04 PM EST reply actions  

I think 5-15 yards per game is a small estimate, which I guess I didn’t make clear enough. You mention the Saints and they averaged one of the higher net punt totals in the league. It’s probably a 5-10 yard per punt difference for them, unless they’ve got a special kicker, in which case it’s probably still a few yards per punt difference.

Even those 15 yards are more difficult to make up than you think. You can’t just say you’ll take a penalty less per game. If teams could do that, they’d keep their punters and still avoid the penalty.

Just 15 yards per game is the difference between having a 5 yard per carry back and a 4.25 ypc guy over 20 carries. It’s a decent QB 7 yards per pass attempt QB vs a bad 6.5 yards per attempt passer over 30 passes.

It’s a notable difference and there’s no way that Robert Eddins or Joaquin Bell is worth that kind of difference. It’s not remotely close and that’s why no NFL teams ever really try it. Honestly, the math really blows the idea out of the water and out of the realm of possibility.

"You mean @TWHITNER. It’s how he prefers to be referenced." - Jon Harrington

by kaisertown on Jan 23, 2012 9:16 PM EST up reply actions   2 recs

It’s a notable difference and there’s no way that Robert Eddins or Joaquin Bell is worth that kind of difference.

Agreed.

Give a monkey a typewriter and infinite time, and he’ll eventually release Maybin. -- stetzwebs
No one circles the waiver wire like the Buffalo Bills!

by thefourwinds on Jan 23, 2012 11:30 PM EST up reply actions  

If and that's a big IF

You were to do this it would be the kicker getting dropped for the punter cause its easier to convert a punter into a place kicker then it is to go the other way around. So in Buffalo’s case you’d lose Lindell for having just Moorman. If it were me I’d keep both the kicker and punter, then get a backup Center to be the longsnapper. That way, if and when Wood gets injured, we have his backup in place.

by Guido1983 on Jan 23, 2012 9:43 PM EST reply actions  

If it were me I’d keep both the kicker and punter, then get a backup Center to be the longsnapper.

This is an even more specialized and rarer skill than either of the kickers.

Give a monkey a typewriter and infinite time, and he’ll eventually release Maybin. -- stetzwebs
No one circles the waiver wire like the Buffalo Bills!

by thefourwinds on Jan 23, 2012 11:31 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

SB Nation's home for all things Buffalo Bills.
Community Guidelines :: Essential BR

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
The Return of the Running Back(s): Revisiting the Road to the Super Bowl
Bills_small
An Exploration of Ryan Fitzpatrick's TDs and INTs
Small
Beyond the Perfect Offseason: Where Do We Go From Here?
Dsc00843_small
NFL Divisional Record And Playoff Berth Correlation, 2002-2011

Recent FanPosts

Small
Who Will be the Number 2?
Spikes_small
Remaining Free Agents
04_buffalo_bills_football_coloring_at_coloring-pages-book-for-kids-boys_small
Mock 2012 Season
Small
Difference Between A "Franchise" QB and an "Elite" One
303857_872291743296_10504698_40499694_6362492_n_small
Be A Little Nicer Please, Bills Fans  :)
Cyclops1-12nd7cv_small
Current QB Wins
Small
The Count-Down to the Right Numbers
Bruuuuce_small
Ranking All 32 NFL Starting QB's : Who is ELITE?
Snapshot_20120113_small
Next Stop: 3rd Generation of Winners

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Screen_shot_2012-03-07_at_6 Brian Galliford

100_2488_small MattRichWarren

Authors

Range_march_2011_small Ron From NM

Slide1_small Der Jaeger

Moderators

Sucks_small Kurupt

Mrsinister03_small sireric

Cordy_small poz