2011 Best 10 Bang For The Dollar Bills
The Buffalo Bills found some great value on their 2011 roster. Waiver wire additions dotted the offensive line, while late-round draft choices and rookies contributed on both offense and defense.
Players on the list are rated based on their contributions on the field in relation to their salary. They are generally outperforming their contracts, and most are young players on their first deals. For comparison's sake, we will use each player's cap hit for the season - using information from Spotrac.com. We'll start off with three folks who just missed the cut:
Honorable Mentions: Demetrius Bell ($569k), Da'Norris Searcy ($496k), Chris Hairston ($479k) Honestly, the hardest spot to peg was the tenth and final spot. All three of these players made cases to be on the list. Bell and Hairston started six and seven games at left tackle, respectively, on an offensive line that gave up the fewest sacks in the NFL. I wouldn't call either of them great, but both certainly earned their salaries in 2011. Searcy's play was good in 2011, and in most seasons would have made the list. He had 22 tackles and a game-clinching interception in extensive time during his rookie campaign.
10. Justin Rogers ($392k) Rogers squeaks into the top ten over Searcy thanks to his lower salary and special teams work. He was drafted three rounds after his defensive backfield comrade and had 12 tackles, one interception, and four passes defended. When he was inserted as the kickoff returner, he gave the Bills' special teams a spark, averaging a healthy 28.7 yards per return.
9. George Wilson ($1.7M) Wilson was much higher on this list last season before signing his contract extension in the off-season. Despite that new salary figure, Wilson had a strong season in his first full year as a starter, ranking second on the team in tackles while playing in only 13 games. He also had four picks, six passes defended, two forced fumbles, and a fumble recovery.
8. Erik Pears ($1.2M) During the off-season the Bills tried to add Tyson Clabo because they weren't sure if Pears could handle the job. Now Pears will be in Buffalo for the foreseeable future after signing a new contract extension. He manned the right side of the line for every snap of the 2011 season, and his consistency helped the Bills offense to thrive (at times).
7. Kelvin Sheppard ($578k) Buffalo's third-round selection in 2011 contributed right away in his rookie season, stepping in to start the final nine games. He was fifth on the team in tackles with 42, and recorded a safety and fumble recovery. His size and speed will make him a vital cog in the Bills defense in 2012.
6. Fred Jackson ($2.1M) It's very likely Jackson would have topped this list had his season not been cut short by injury despite being the highest-paid player in the top ten. The running back was on pace for an MVP-type season before a broken leg shut him down after only 10 games. Extrapolating his numbers over 16 games, he was in line for 1,500 rushing yards, another 700 receiving yards, and 10 touchdowns.
5. Kraig Urbik ($678k) Urbik was much-maligned in training camp, including by yours truly, but was consistent in the middle of Buffalo's offensive line during the 2011 season. He started 13 games at right guard and center for the Bills, manning the pivot until his season was cut short by a knee injury. Urbik enters the off-season as a restricted free agent, and will get a nice raise.
4. Andy Levitre ($830k) The only blemish on Levitre's 2011 resume is his one start at center, where his erratic shotgun snaps threw off the rhythm of the whole offense. He started games at three different offensive line positions, and was Buffalo's best offensive lineman for 16 games. The team may be eying a contract extension for Levitre as he enters the final year of his rookie deal.
3. Stevie Johnson ($1.2M) No matter where I put Stevie on this list, I'm going to get grief because he's not number one. (He was at the top last season.) He became the first receiver in team history to post back-to-back 1,000-yard seasons, eclipsing the total on his final catch of 2011. His 76 catches and seven touchdowns as the team's No. 1 receiver definitely put him in line for a nice contract as he enters unrestricted free agency.
2. David Nelson ($409k) Nelson made just over a third of Johnson's cap figure in 2011, but his production was right behind the boisterous leader of the wide receiver corps. Nelson had 61 catches for 658 yards, both second on the team, and five touchdown catches to rank third. I don't think Nelson is as valuable or as talented as Johnson, but 70 percent of Johnson's production for 34 percent of his pay moves him into second place on our list.
1. Jairus Byrd ($935k) Byrd's play has gone largely unrecognized by the national media, but his 2011 campaign was an all-around excellent performance. He was third on the team with 75 tackles, defended eight passes, and tied for second with three interceptions, one of which he returned for a score. Byrd's ability to be successful in the box is really what has elevated his game during his third NFL season. He forced three fumbles, recovered one, and had a sack as his game has gone from playing centerfield and picking off errant passes to making plays all over the field. He is what Donte Whitner was supposed to be for the Bills defense, and he made less than a million bucks in 2011.
34 comments
|
1 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Seems most of these are rookies, scrap heap guys or low round draft picks. Makes sense.
.
When the job is finished no one remembers how long it took, just how well it was performed.
by Buffalo for Eternity on Jan 26, 2012 1:37 PM EST reply actions
Byrd: Round 2 pick.
Nelson: undrafted free agent.
Johnson: Round 7 pick.
Levitre: Round 2 pick.
Urbik: Round 3 pick. (Yes, he was acquired via waivers, but that also means his rookie contract with PIT is intact.)
Jackson: Had already signed a contract extension.
Sheppard: Round 3 pick.
Pears: Had already signed a contract extension.
Wilson: Had already signed a contract extension.
Rogers: Round 7 pick.
I’m not sure that I agree with you on that one.
Editor-in-Chief, BUFFALO RUMBLINGS®
Follow @BrianGalliford
by Brian Galliford on Jan 26, 2012 1:41 PM EST up reply actions
Whoops. Sheppard should’ve been bolded, too.
Editor-in-Chief, BUFFALO RUMBLINGS®
Follow @BrianGalliford
by Brian Galliford on Jan 26, 2012 1:45 PM EST up reply actions
I did not mean to cast aspersions. I was correlating performance versus cost. In that regard any list of “best bang for the buck” will include players that do not have great cost but perform to some extent. Look on any team for a similarly veined article and they will also have multiple players that were lower draft picks or FAs.
.
When the job is finished no one remembers how long it took, just how well it was performed.
by Buffalo for Eternity on Jan 26, 2012 5:45 PM EST up reply actions
Perhaps he should have said rookie contracts instead of rookies?
Then, Levitre, Urbik and Shepphard would also be bolded.
Thank you thank you thank you thank you sireric for bringing the furious punching cat back into my life. - poz
by bluecollarbuffalo on Jan 26, 2012 2:30 PM EST up reply actions
Byrd Byrd Byrd!
Best player we have on this team. GO GO JB!
Girls use hair spray, Men don't.
DO YOURSELF A FAVOR AND GROW UP BY NOT USING HAIRSPRAY MALES!
Don't be a Paully!
by The Buffalo Kid on Jan 26, 2012 1:39 PM EST reply actions
where his erratic shotgun snaps threw off the rhythm of the whole offense.
Levitre snaps weren’t erratic, 90% of them were low and to Fitz’ left. It was like he was experience a golfer’s putting hiccup, no matter what adjustment he tried to make, he snapped it low and outside. It was almost comical.
by PineWoodsBillsFan on Jan 26, 2012 1:49 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
No Chandler?
I think his presence as a 1.2 million dollar red zone threat should at least earned him an honorable mention
His TD numbers were great, I’ll give you that. He wouldn’t have made the top ten. How many Honorable mentions can I make? :-)
by MattRichWarren on Jan 26, 2012 3:16 PM EST up reply actions
Can't get behind Byrd as #1
I guess my definition of “bang” is impactful. IMHO Stevie had more impact with only a modest increase in salary. I believe after FJ, Stevie is the most dynamic player we have that defenses have to game plan for. Although Byrd is fantastic at his position, I can’t see the overall inpact as much, through these eyes of course.
some really good
Young talent. We just have to keep them here and continue to draft well. Yes, continue. Last years draft has a chance to be great.
And guys like byrd, wood, levitre, are fundamental for this team.
"The Buffalo Bills have just exploded all over the Cincinnati Bangles"
-Steve Tasker-
by billsoferie on Jan 26, 2012 2:35 PM EST via mobile reply actions
Question
How did Stevie Johnson make $1.2 mil in base salary this year?
Wasn’t he in the last year of a rookie contract? Shouldn’t he have been in the $450k range?
"First souls collected" - Abayarde, 9/11/11
Id have to say George Wilson should be higher.
But that list is certainly a good start. All players I liked too.
"@Katebits: At this rate Sarah Maclachlan is going to start making sad commercials about the Sabres soon."
No improvement on this team??
I remember several years back when it was hard to come up with ten, and the argument was, this player or that player does not deserve to be on the list, but they had to put someone on the list of ten.
Please base your arguments in provable facts instead of pulling stuff out of your rear. -CanadianBillsFan- This is why talk is cheap because the supply always exceeds the demand.
How anyone can consider somebody who make 2.1M dollars a year BANG FOR A BUCK is just amazing. Heck even 500k is an insane amount of money to make in one year…
by BuffaloFanFromCT on Jan 26, 2012 3:14 PM EST reply actions
This isn’t meant to be compared to your local janitor making 30k a year, it’s compared to other NFL players with similar statistical production. We all know NFL players make a lot of money…
by Steckmeister03 on Jan 26, 2012 10:21 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Byrd
Byrd is the best FS we have had in a long time and has the potential to be the best the Bills have ever had (in my opinion). Lets not forget he cam out of Oregon as a CB he will continue to improve and should be given an extension before he gets on the Nation meadia’s radar and we can’t or won’t pay for his services anymore.
by joeyzacc on Jan 26, 2012 3:31 PM EST via mobile reply actions
Barnett?
I know he’s highly paid compared to everyone on this list, but I’d consider him an honorable mention for $4mm, which puts him somewhere between #30 and 40 in the NFL in terms of salary, and well behind Poz. As bad as our defense was, can anyone imagine if we signed Poz (for presumably much more and much longer) instead?
Byrd is the right choice - I agree completely with him at number 1
This even grates my passive cheese - LeClaire Bill
I concur Poz.
But I would have Andy at #2 because of what he did for us this year at multiple positions.
If we didn’t have him, we would’ve been screwed.
And Fitz would’ve gotten sacked a crapload of times.
"My new cat just farted on my lap. Smells like Bills football." BG.
by SERGEANT MAJOR THOR on Jan 26, 2012 6:56 PM EST up reply actions
Brian can attest that I had Levitre at 2 for a while but bumped him back to four (eventually). I went back and forth but I think Nelson and Stevie’s numbers are too hard to ignore.
by MattRichWarren on Jan 26, 2012 7:41 PM EST up reply actions
The only one I’m not sure about is Nelson. Yes, he had a pretty solid statistical season and came up with some big catches, I just don’t know how impressed with it I should be.
by Steckmeister03 on Jan 26, 2012 10:23 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Strictly speaking, I think “bang for the buck” relies a lot on statistical production. He far surpassed his contract in terms of big catches on 3rd down and overall statistical production.
"Slowly all the roles we act out become our identity. And in the end we are what we pretend to be." - Jerry Cantrell.
This underlines
a huge problem on this team. That many of the players carrying the highest cap numbers are not very good. Look at the top 15 cap-hit players. I think we have 5 productive players. Look at the Giants and Pats top cap players. They are impact players. The cap management has been really bad in this regard. Just look at those cap numbers its kind of sad to look at.
by J09 on Jan 26, 2012 10:24 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
That happens on a lot of teams, though.
by MattRichWarren on Jan 28, 2012 9:59 AM EST up reply actions
MRW
Very nice post.
The Sum Of A Franchise Is Directly Proportionate To The Talent Of Franchise's QB. Get A QB OBD!
Build From Within
Best way is to forgo FA and build from within. Most decent companies work kinda like that. Spotting talent and retaining is good. Seems rightly so, that this franchise has been lacking in talent evaluation and retention of talent on team, almost comical. But being a fan I take it personal!:)
The Sum Of A Franchise Is Directly Proportionate To The Talent Of Franchise's QB. Get A QB OBD!

by 































