Bills Have Problems Using Two Productive Backs
For most NFL teams, having two running backs capable of putting up big numbers is a very nice problem to have. For the Buffalo Bills and head coach Chan Gailey, it's just a problem.
In two years running Buffalo's offense, Gailey has yet to figure out how to successfully incorporate a second running back productively into his offense. Let's discount the first four games of his tenure, when Marshawn Lynch complicated the picture; in the 28 games since, the Bills have used Fred Jackson and C.J. Spiller - and then Spiller and Tashard Choice - "in tandem," but only one back has been productive. Just look at the numbers.
| PER-GAME AVERAGE: Games 5-26 (22 games) | ||||||
| Fred Jackson | 17 carries | 81 yards | 3 receptions | 30 yards | 111 scrimmage yards | 12 total TD |
| C.J. Spiller | 4 carries | 16 yards | 1 reception | 9 yards | 25 scrimmage yards | 1 total TD |
| Group per-game TD average: 0.59 | ||||||
| PER-GAME AVERAGE: Games 27-32 (6 games) | ||||||
| C.J. Spiller | 14 carries | 74 yards | 4 receptions | 31 yards | 105 scrimmage yards | 5 total TD |
| Tashard Choice | 4 carries | 12 yards | 1 reception | 9 yards | 21 scrimmage yards | 1 total TD |
| Group per-game TD average: 1.0 | ||||||
Much has been made about Spiller's production over the final six games of the 2011 season as Jackson's injury fill-in, and with good reason: this is the type of production that we've expected for 32 games from the former Top 10 pick, and not just the last six.
Clearly, Gailey believes in having a No. 1 back get the bulk of the touches, as well as in getting a change-of-pace back a few touches per game. The problem here, of course, is that despite whatever pre-conceived notions Gailey has about Spiller's ability to handle a full workload, he has two No. 1 backs on his roster. Spiller can no longer be considered a change of pace. Both beasts need to be fed.
This, in my opinion, is perhaps the most critical hurdle Gailey has to clear this off-season as he prepares for his third (and perhaps final) year as the head coach here: figuring out how to legitimately use two backs in his offense. The formula from the past 28 games has worked for one runner, but now he's got two - and the Bills don't have enough talent elsewhere to ignore one of those talented players for lesser talents at other positions. The formula outlined above won't work anymore. Jackson and Spiller need to be central figures in Buffalo's offense, and Gailey needs to figure out how that will work.
61 comments
|
3 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Please just look at tape of Carolina from the past 3 years
Plenty of examples, even when Cam Newton wasn’t involved. There is no reason we can’t have 2 backs approach 1000 yards next season, while limiting the passing attempts of our INT prone QB.
This would require inverting the “pass to set up the run” philosophy, but it is what I have wanted to see from this team for years!
Agreed
Right now Gailey has Fitz attempting 2 passes for every rush he does. First balancing the plays will give Fitz more opportunities and also gets more production from two established backs.
by DynamicHero22 on Jan 4, 2012 12:00 PM EST up reply actions
Jackson and Spiller should each touch the football once before Fitzpatrick throws it elsewhere.
"Go check on the ribs!"
by TheAfghanTwilight on Jan 4, 2012 12:41 PM EST up reply actions
The Texans had two 1000 backs this season, helped in part by injuries.
"Go check on the ribs!"
by TheAfghanTwilight on Jan 4, 2012 12:40 PM EST up reply actions
Considering both backs running and catching abilities and Jackson’s blocking ability, both backs should stay on the field 90 percent of the time.
Don’t be surprised to see Fred transition to a Larry Centers style of Full Back in coming years if the Bills sign him for a couple more years. Fred can block and the Bills may need to utilize that skill in years to come.
by WhatGoesAround on Jan 4, 2012 10:12 AM EST via mobile reply actions
Not if the Bills bring back the John Riggins plan.
"Go check on the ribs!"
by TheAfghanTwilight on Jan 4, 2012 12:41 PM EST up reply actions
good point
Marcus Allen also moved to FB so it can be done.
Check out http://mocknfldrafts.blogspot.com/
by Billsdownunder on Jan 4, 2012 1:12 PM EST up reply actions
Most teams have this issue
You don’t see many teams that have two highly productive backs, at least on a consistent basis. Usually the teams that utilize two backs heavily have two guys that complement each other’s skills (Bradshaw and Jacobs, for example). In Buffalo, both players are capable of running, catching and blocking (Spiller less so). That’s where the problem builds from. There are no specific situations where one guy should be in over the other, assuming Spiller takes the leap to fully capable contributor over the long haul.
Teams that use multiple backs more equally include the Pats, Saints, Chargers, Giants, Packers, and Panthers. I would throw the Texans in because of Ben Tate, but Arian Foster is the bell cow and still dominates the work. Other than maybe Carolina, each of those teams uses multiple backs because they each have different skills. Very rarely does a team use two RB’s in the same way, which is why it can be difficult to get both of them enough work and productivity. Gailey is probably going to have to follow a Carolina type blueprint to incorporate both, but that means going a bit more run heavy, I suppose. I’m not sure he’s willing to do that.
It’s easy to say Gailey should rotate series with them or give one 60% of the work, or whatever in theory, but not as easy in execution based on game situation and the so-called “hot hand”. This is not an easy thing to do, but something that Gailey is likely going to have to do.
Am I the only one who though Choice did a solid job after joining the team? Of course, he can’t catch a slant to save his life, but I think he earned a chance to enter the summer as the team’s 3rd RB, assuming he’s offered a 1 or 2 year contract.
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
by Kurupt on Jan 4, 2012 10:14 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
You don’t see many teams that have two highly productive backs, at least on a consistent basis.
That’s exactly what the Bills don’t have, though: two highly productive backs on an inconsistent basis. They consistently have one productive back and a guy that annoyingly steals his touches.
Editor-in-Chief, BUFFALO RUMBLINGS®
Follow @BrianGalliford
by Brian Galliford on Jan 4, 2012 10:16 AM EST up reply actions
I know
That’s why Gailey needs to figure out how to make them both consistently productive at the same time. It’s not as easy as it sounds. Spiller earned the chance to get more than “annoyingly stealing Jackson’s touches” status. Hope he can perform when given that chance next year.
~K
"As the governor of Louisiana once said, the only way Chris Kelsay can lose his job is if he got caught in bed with a dead girl or a live boy."
You are completely right, it’s the coach’s job to establish the roles, old saying there is no “I” in T-E-A-M. I like Kevin Faulk as the prototype for Jackson, he’s a 35 year old RB going to the playoffs again, playing because he comes through at the special moments when the Pats need him. Faulk hasn’t played as much this year, but Belichick has him in hip pocket to call on. And Freddy is light years ahead of Faulk in talent.
No, you aren’t the only one. I don’t understand some of the Choice hate I’ve seen…he did what was asked of him when it was asked. What else can you expect from a 3rd down back?
"Slowly all the roles we act out become our identity. And in the end we are what we pretend to be." - Jerry Cantrell.
by stetzwebs on Jan 4, 2012 10:39 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Different styles
While they aren’t as pronounced as Bradshaw and Jacobs, there are enough key differences in the way Jackson and Spiller run the ball to provide enough of a change of pace…they just need to be used the right way. Living in the NYC area I get to see the Giants a lot and am frustrated that the Bills don’t have a similar 1-2 punch given the talent level. I saw a stat during last weekends Giants-cowboys game demonstrating the success of the run game (and the team as a whole) when both backs are involved. Perhaps the extra playing time in late 2011 earns Spiller more touches in 2012 (hopefully more at the expense of FItz, not Jackson).
"They're Killin' Me Whitey. They're Killin' Me" -- Lou Saban
+1
the only thing that Freddy and Spiller have in common is elusiveness. Spiller makes a cut and is gone, Freddy always seems to be running in a crowd, and no one can tackel him.
Yes
And when they tackle Jackson he falls forward for 3-4 extra yards. Spiller just falls down. One of the amazing things about Thurman Thomas is the yards gained after contact. My favorite move is when he would twist his body so that he is virtually upside down and surge forward using his legs, often using body parts of would-be tacklers to stay above ground for those extra yards. In a game of inches, these little things make a difference. Freddie has the same qualities. Spiller seems to be getting better after contact, instead of continuing to impersonate Robert Royal. For those that don’t remember the former Bills TE, he never gained a millimeter after contact, always falling backward.
"They're Killin' Me Whitey. They're Killin' Me" -- Lou Saban
Choice is very underrated
he did a decent job at the Cowboys but they didn’t really have a clear spot for him when Barber and Jones were healthy. I don’t know if he complements Fredex and CJ precisely (ie: goal line, short yardage) but the fact is he is good depth and should be kept on the roster.
Check out http://mocknfldrafts.blogspot.com/
by Billsdownunder on Jan 4, 2012 1:14 PM EST up reply actions
Tashard is more of a spell, goaline threat than anything.
The way Fred was playing earliier this season, at an almost MVP level, it get’s easy to justify giving him the ball on most downs.
Even with this, I expect to see more dual RB plays next year, as well as the utilization of CJ on the outside. Both player’s talents demand they touch the ball. And hopefully Chan can figure out a game plan that allows both players strengths to co-exist.
Shun the non Billievers!
Fred clearly was Buffalo’s MVP this season.
"Go check on the ribs!"
by TheAfghanTwilight on Jan 4, 2012 12:43 PM EST up reply actions
Choice
Inside the tackles runner, Spiller outside. Chan couldn’t get production outa both till recently. Lets see how tandem FJ and CJ play out next yr. Bet we see more running. I hope so considering who’ll be under center! Note didn’t say need a QB.
If you didn't like my last post wait till you read the next! :) Until we draft/acquire franchise QB we'll be setting records for losing soon!
by buffalobacker on Jan 4, 2012 9:04 PM EST up reply actions
We should run more two back sets maybe out of the shotgun and motion one out occasionally and use one to run block or as a decoy. I’ve noticed that he barely ever spells the running backs either. He definitely needs to do some research because being able to run the ball 40 times a game would keep our passing attack much more potent. It’d be nice having the other defense worn down by the 3rd quarter and then being able to run the ball down their throat and use play action to throw it over the top which we never do
It has been said that when you have two star running backs, you don’t have any happy running backs. Each one wants to be the feature back, so the one who isn’t isn’t happy, while the one who is doesn’t like to loses touches or look over his shoulder to see if the other guy will take his place. We had a great situation with Thurman Thomas and Kenny Davis because Davis was perfectly content to be the #2 back. He was a great team player.
I think that Gailey should be able line up both backs and have a variety of options. Either one can line up as a receiver, and Spiller could be used for reverses. Jackson can throw the ball (although I can’t remember the last time he got to do it). It just seems like Gailey should be able to use both, but doesn’t. For an offensive “genius”, he seems to lack creativity.
by SiriusRed on Jan 4, 2012 10:45 AM EST via mobile reply actions
The key is that both are really good receivers
The way to use both of them much of the time is to have one of them lined up as RB and the other as a receiver — either split out wide or in the slot or initially positioned as a RB and headed for the flat to be a checkdown guy. Both of them are major threats when you can get them the ball in space, so that is what Gailey needs to do. They can keep exchanging their roles — one functioning as the RB on a given play, then as the receiver on the next — in order to keep the defense guessing. Or at times have both in the backfield.
In effect we have two impressive #1 RB’s and a spread offense. If so, then integrate the RB’s into the spread. With all his experience Gailey should be able to figure out how to do that.
by Macktruck on Jan 4, 2012 11:09 AM EST reply actions 2 recs
Buffalo has had this problem since Thomas/Davis
Buffalo has had this problem for a while now. Remeber when Mularkey was supposed to be able to have ‘fun’ with Travis Henry and Willis McGahee, and we had Marshawn Lynch and Jackson, and now Jackson/Spiller. You would think getting 2 top backs involved would be easy…I guess not.
Fred should get 20-25 touches a game, and Spiller should get 10-15 touches a game. Anything less will keep producing the lop-sided results.
Freddy is 30 years old
and got 20 touches a game this year. What did it get him? Banged up, ending with a broken leg. Let Spiller to the main work, he seems to need it to do well. Save Jackson for the critical plays.
He could have broken his leg on 5 touches a game, probably more likely he would with less production. His being 30 doesn’t mean he’s going to suffer a broken leg on a feature back’s diet.
30 isn’t old. At least I hope it isn’t! Not in today’s NFL, where science plays a part in player maintenance.
"Go check on the ribs!"
by TheAfghanTwilight on Jan 4, 2012 12:48 PM EST up reply actions
He also had problems with his left hand/wrist that probably led to the spate of fumbles and dropped passes around mid-season. Maybe other stuff too. Jackson is a special talent, but you don’t want to use him in situations when someone else can do the job.
I disagree. You want Jackson on the field for every offensive snap he’s able to take.
"Go check on the ribs!"
by TheAfghanTwilight on Jan 4, 2012 1:08 PM EST up reply actions
We knew this when we hired him....
There was a post on this site when Gailey was hired that shouwed how many touches he would give to RBs in his offenses. The stats clearly showed Gailey used a workhorse style for his RBs. Almost all the carries always went to one RB, this is his MO and I do not think it will change.
With that said, Jackson is one of the best all-around backs out there but I do not see him returning. What CJ did in the second half almost cetainly spells Jackson doom.
Spiller still plays second fiddle to Jackson while Fred is in Buffalo.
"Go check on the ribs!"
by TheAfghanTwilight on Jan 4, 2012 12:48 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
bills have problems keeping their backs
i mean,i don’t know how we can keep fred, the bills won’t pay him as he deserves
proud to be a die hard bills fan from france
Resign stevie, chandler and scott, then i will think about april
Extend Jackson lucratively...
And explain to him that his new role will be as third down/critical yardage back. Jackson has always been good coming in cold, dating back to the Lynch days. Fewer touches = fewer injuries = longer career. Both Jackson and Spiller can get five yards on first down, but who would you rather have on the field on third down?
Wishbone
Anyone seen the wishbone offense recently?
Why not Spiller and Jackson with McIntyre behind fitz, the formation alone presents so many questions to defenses on what to focus on. Draw plays, Sweep, screen (to which side) motion (either or each back).
Etc, I dont need to go on, just wondering if Gaily would consider it.
Thoughts?
Too one-dimensional for nfl. Defenses would just load up the box. If they couldn’t stop em, it might work.
Add Smith and you’d have the Wildbone Wishcat…
Good screen name: Wildbone Wishcat
"Go check on the ribs!"
by TheAfghanTwilight on Jan 4, 2012 1:07 PM EST up reply actions
lol
That is funny, thanks.
If you didn't like my last post wait till you read the next! :) Until we draft/acquire franchise QB we'll be setting records for losing soon!
by buffalobacker on Jan 4, 2012 9:16 PM EST up reply actions
This is why Chan needs to bring an OC.
One that knows how to use 2 very good RB’s and a passing game that involves using a more tradional base.
Basically scrap the spread.
Screw you MSG, and screw you TWC!
I want my Sabres!
by bflo on Jan 4, 2012 11:49 AM EST reply actions 1 recs
Spiller doesn't produce as second fiddle
Fred has obviously earned his place as the number one running option on the team, but having a number 9 pick who has shown he can be a number one in the NFL as a backup doesn’t work. Once Jackson went down Spiller transformed and totally embraced the role of being the goto guy. My fear is he will revert back to his former self next year when he doesn’t get the touches. They could keep things status quo and let Fred walk after last year, or they could trade either CJ or Fred. I’m guessing CJ would have more trade value because he is younger and has more years on his contract, but Fred was putting up MVP numbers before getting injured.
If we could get a stud WR or good draft picks, this might be worth exploring. For this next year CJ is more an expensive insurance policy than anything else.
"There were a lot of guys that were disappointed, frustrated and down, me included."
- Ryan Fitzpatrick
What “former self”? He was producing at a high clip early in the year when he was only getting 3 or 4 touches a game, as well.
"Slowly all the roles we act out become our identity. And in the end we are what we pretend to be." - Jerry Cantrell.
yeah, that is true. i guess my real fear is he will just be grossly underutilized.
"There were a lot of guys that were disappointed, frustrated and down, me included."
- Ryan Fitzpatrick
That is my fear as well. I like the idea of Freddie and Spiller getting 30-35 touches a game next year, as long as some of those touches are passes, and they continue producing at such a high level. I think it’s a little unrealistic to ask for 35 runs a game, especially in such a passing league. Though I guess it could happen, it’s just hard to keep up with NE that way.
"Slowly all the roles we act out become our identity. And in the end we are what we pretend to be." - Jerry Cantrell.
For the Buffalo Bills and head coach Chan Gailey, it’s just a problem.
IMO, it’s a problem of Gailey’s own creation. His game plans made it so. When he was hired, he was touted as the man who “got the most from the talent of the players he had”. Well, this “problem” is in direct conflict to that statement.
Funny how other teams (NYG and NO come to mind) can make use of multiple RBs with talent.
I am not convinced that this is anything but Gailey’s approach. It could work and work well (and we wouldn’t have to look at so many errant Fitz passes)
"a play in which nothing happens, that yet keeps audiences glued to their seats". -Vivian Mercier - a description of Samuel Beckett's "Waiting for Godot"
According to Beckett, Godot was a metaphor for the Buffalo Bills :-)
by fansince60 on Jan 4, 2012 12:20 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
NYG
They can’t make use of it, at least not this year. They’re ranked dead last in rushing yards per game this year.
"Slowly all the roles we act out become our identity. And in the end we are what we pretend to be." - Jerry Cantrell.
well injuries were partly to blame early on(Bradshaw). NYG are playing better ball now that they have Bradshaw back.
"a play in which nothing happens, that yet keeps audiences glued to their seats". -Vivian Mercier - a description of Samuel Beckett's "Waiting for Godot"
According to Beckett, Godot was a metaphor for the Buffalo Bills :-)
^ I approve this message
I love this plan! I'm excited to be a part of it! LET'S DO IT! - Venkman
by J2 on Jan 4, 2012 1:07 PM EST up reply actions
@fansince60
Let me start with I love your posts/opinions but why this hate for Chan? You do realize its early in his employment and his inherited roster wasn’t like even bad, it was worse. He’s made watching team bearable in most games, farcry better than DJ. Ask for qb, leave Chan alone man! :)
If you didn't like my last post wait till you read the next! :) Until we draft/acquire franchise QB we'll be setting records for losing soon!
by buffalobacker on Jan 4, 2012 9:20 PM EST up reply actions
I don’t hate anyone. The man has weapons and plays that he chooses to largely ignore. If not for Fedex getting hurt, Spiller would have 10% of the production he wound up with. In fact, Gailey’s one back obsession may have indirectly contributed to FJs injury. Fatigue can do some nasty things. And then there’s some who have postulated that Chan was “saving” Spiller for next year. If that’s true (not saying it is) how can you save one back and run the other into the ground?
Again, don’t hate the man at all. I dislike his approach to the running of the offense. That’s all. And, part of that is the topic of Brian’s piece.
"a play in which nothing happens, that yet keeps audiences glued to their seats". -Vivian Mercier - a description of Samuel Beckett's "Waiting for Godot"
According to Beckett, Godot was a metaphor for the Buffalo Bills :-)
Split Backfield
I would like to see them try a split backfield with both RBs one the field at the same time. They could put Spiller in motion on some plays and set him up as a receiver since he has that experience now. Both can catch passes out of the back field as well. Also, this would set up some great sweep plays getting Spiller out in space with a lead blocker. Defenses would have to prepare for both backs (Freddy’s ability to find holes and CJ’s speed). We have two great backs and a streaky QB, why not try it? The only problem with this is that Chan will have to abandon his beloved spread formation. Maybe I’m bias… I thought they should have tried this with Lynch and Jackson as well.
by Bills Backer Bob on Jan 4, 2012 12:29 PM EST reply actions
They were also supposed to try this with Henry/McGahee. It never happened, but I like the idea.
by billsfan0240 on Jan 4, 2012 12:31 PM EST up reply actions
Gailey has always operated this way.
Every stop he’s made, he’s devoted himself to one back at a time.
"Go check on the ribs!"
by TheAfghanTwilight on Jan 4, 2012 12:39 PM EST reply actions
The issue isn't having two good backs here
The issue is having a coach that doesn’t rely on the running game as heavily as he should in the first place.
Throughout the first half of the season we had story after story of Gailey abandoning Fred Jackson mid-game (sometimes early on), and when Fred went down, they just copied/pasted those articled doing a Replace All; “Fred Jackson”=“CJ SPiller”.
Once we have a game plan that can dedicate to the run properly, this issue will become what it actually is; a non-issue. Fred Will get an extension, he will stay in Buffalo for a year or two, then CJ will step in and we’ll draft a few more RBs along the way (sorry, Bills fans).
What you see is what you get.
Chan has shown beyond a reasonable doubt that he can not run an offense that features two backs. Instead, he features an average at best QB throwing to below average receivers out of a spread formation where there is zero threat of a run. A skeptic might say “that does not sound like what an offensive genius would do.”
prediction for 2011 season is 5 and 11
a good GM would make the most of this 'problem'
Wonder what Nix will do instead… history suggests the bills will dump Spiller for a couple of late round picks…
The most sane thing to do would be to help Gailey learn to utilize both, knowing that at any moment either could, say, break a leg.
The next most rational thing would be to trade Jackson and a pick to move up in the draft to get a franchise cornerstone. (I say trade Jackson instead is Spiller because Jackson is older, not because Spiller is better. Besides then Jackson may get a well deserved shot a
t playing for a winner.)
I wasn't sure I was going to like the white helmets but seeing them in the practice footage, I've got to say that I love the look.
by Ron From NM on Jan 4, 2012 1:14 PM EST via mobile reply actions
See, I actually think they will do the “next most rational thing”. I just sensed that they drafted White, got a guy (by accident) in Choice that Gailey is familiar with, and saw that Spiller can indeed get the job done, so I think they will look to trade him. Problem is, I bet the dump him for a 3rd or 4th or something absurd, making it a pretty lame move.
Thank you thank you thank you thank you sireric for bringing the furious punching cat back into my life. - poz
by bluecollarbuffalo on Jan 4, 2012 2:06 PM EST up reply actions
it would be nice
to see Gailey incorporate the running game more but he simply won’t as his style is pass to setup the run. If successful you not only have a good functioning offense but also an exciting one (as exhibited by the early season victories) but if not successful you are liable for blowout losses through pick 6’s, defense on the field a long time etc etc. To steal Dancam’s poker analogy, Gailey is all-in with the spread and probably all-in with Fitz also because even if the Bills take a QB this draft he is unlikely to start.
Check out http://mocknfldrafts.blogspot.com/
Texans
Raiders.
No reason we couldn’t more closely resemble these teams, with our giant sized linemen, quick, shifty running backs, who are still capable of running with some power (some may disagree about CJ, but he is more aggressive, and seems stronger than most backs his size, at least to me.)
ABAYARDE IS NOSTRADAMUS JUST WATCH WE WILL NOT YIEALD TO NOBODY YOUR SOUL WE WILL TAKE
Everyone Is Missing One Thing
The one thing that everyone is missing in this discussion is: blocking ability.
The reason that a lot of highly-touted young RBs don’t make it onto the field much their first or second years is that they never were asked to block in college and don’t pick up NFL blocking skills or schemes right away when they get to the NFL (a problem for Spiller, but also for Willis McGahee, too, if you recall). NFL head coaches-and not just Gailley-are very reluctant to consistently use young RBs who aren’t good picking up the pass rush until they learn how to do that (some never do).
Fred Jackson is the best blocking RB the Bills have had since Thurman Thomas, who was one of the very best. As a pass-blocker, Spiller can’t shine Freddy’s shoes. In fact, it is very likely that Gailley has used Choice over Spiller at RB in so many 3rd down situations is based on Choice being better at picking up pass rushers than Spiller is (this may be accounted for by the fact that Spiller has spent so much time working with the WRs the past two seasons because of injuries). Because deception also plays a big role in the passing game, based on their blocking ability, given a choice, Gailley (and almost any other NFL head coach) will pick Fred Jackson over CJ Spiller almost every time at this point in their careers. And shouldn’t be faulted for doing so.
While Spiller has high 1st round talent and is a “home-run” threat every time he gets the ball, given his lack of size and blocking ability, Gailley is naturally reluctant to use him in certain situations—especially when he has such a well-rounded RB in Fred Jackson available. However, as Spiller fills out a little more (gets a full offseason in a NFL strength and conditioning program and physically matures) and improves his blocking skills (works full-time with the RBs in OTAs and training camp), Gailley will probably be more willing to play Spiller more at RB (and give him more touches) than he has thus far.
Because they are both different style runners: Fred is a “slasher” who finds the little cracks and breaks tackles, while CJ is a one-cut and go type runner with breakaway speed; there is room for both to be used as the # 1 in different situations once Spiller gets his blocking up to par. First, Spiller is going to have to prove to Gailley that he can be trusted to pick up the blitz in passing situations. Then, the trick will be to convince Freddy that, being over 30, having CJ take some playing time and touches away from him will benefit him by extending his career—which is probably going to take some money (having spent so much time not making anything, now that Freddy has a chance to get paid, he wants to finally make some money because, at his age, this is his last chance to do so).
Gailley probably would like to use both Jackson and Spiller a lot, but, given the limitations of the offensive line, he’s not going to give them equal time or increase the amount of running plays for Spiller until he feels confident in CJ’s ability to pass block first.
Before anyone points to rookie RBs who have stepped right into the NFL as starters and lit it up right away, let me point out that either those rookies already had learned how to pass block in college or picked up pass blocking very quickly or were in situations where their NFL team was so desperate for a quality runner that the head coach was willing to overlook their pass blocking deficiencies. Also, look at how many RBs have come in and lit it up as rookies or emergency injury replacements who showed great running ability but were out of the league a couple of years later despite not having any critical injuries. With a very good blocking RB in Fred Jackson, Gailley hasn’t had to take those kinds of risks with Spiller—he has been able to afford to wait until CJ bulks up a bit and learns how to be proficient picking up blitzes. And I wouldn’t blame him for that.
Those who do not learn fromt eh past are doomed to repeat it.
by LifetimeBillsFan on Jan 5, 2012 8:26 AM EST reply actions 2 recs

by 

































