What's the Diggity?
Today, I bring to Rumblings, a new series. I am going to force feed my thoughts, to anyone silly enough to open this article, out of curiosity, interest, or just sheer boredom. In it... you will find wonders, and mystery.
Actually, you will find... My thoughts, as they relate to the Bills' current roster. I wanted to wait for the lull when we all are bored, have little happening, and are anxiously waiting for SOMETHING to happen, to have anyone spend the time on my silly thoughts, and impressions from this past season. But I too, want to look ahead at what can be, and in order to do that, I figured, I need to see where we really are. So, after the jump, you can check out my assessment, of first, the QBs, and the offensive linemen, who we have grown familiar with, and who may or may not, be part of the plan moving forward. I hope you enjoy my new series, where I will follow up with a few more posts, to cover the remainder of the offense, as well as the entire defense, and my impressions moving into the draft.
For those of you who have been here a while, you know that I am a very opinionated, and long winded fellow. You may or may not have an appreciation for my view, and you may or may not bother reading this post. I respect that, but what I will say, is that if you pass this by, you are totally missing out. What follows, is how TRT would approach this offseason, and what the roster that I assembled, would likely resemble. I have put in a fair amount of time, and will probably consider another look at this, after the NFL Combine. For now, I will provide a roster breakdown, some hopes regarding scheme, as well as some additions that could be made to help make us competitive in the upcoming season. Most importantly, I will provide my player by position breakdown, where I provide my own perspective on current Buffalo Bills players, and how I would approach their situation, and the improvement of this team. Most assuredly, there will be some things you don’t agree with. Some of you may think my assessment is a tad extreme, opinionated, or just plain wrong. Others, might want me to take Nix’s place atop the OBD staff (ok, probably only I want this)… because they (and maybe even YOU) will think “Hey, this guy is onto something here.” Most of these ideas I have already shared. Some of them might be new, and maybe even surprising. Ultimately, this is a Post-season assessment of where I think we are, where I think we COULD be, and where I ultimately see us going, this coming season. After all that: Here we go!
The easiest way for me to approach this, is with each position, our current players, and where I might like an upgrade. For now, I will just assign any holes created/existing with a letter, to be addressed later on.
Quarterback- IMO- This position is the single most important position in the league.
Ryan Fitzpatrick -OBD would have us believe that Ryan Fitzpatrick is capable, qualified, and can lead us to a championship. Sure, that COULD be true, but so far in his career, he has not shown me enough to believe this to be true. I look forward to his improvement under new QB Coach Lee, though I am not overly optimistic that “FitzMagic”, can’t turn into his evil twin “FitzTragic” at any second. While I accept that he will be our starter, probably for some time, we are certainly looking for our “QB of the Future” (a 10-12 year starting “Franchise” QB).
Tyler Thigpen- I will waste no time bashing Thiggy, for you fans. I will simply cut him, and let him land on some UFL roster. His release creates hole “A”. Ok… maybe I should say… need #1.
Brad Smith- Is he a QB? Is he a WR? Is he "Slash 2.0"? I personally think the answer to all of these, is no. What I CAN say, is that he CAN operate in a Wildcat package, as he demonstrated earlier in the season, and there is NO ONE better to assist him in this, than David Lee (Lee was named “Innovator of the Year” 2008 by Sporting News for introducing the “Wildcat offense” to the NFL.) He has shown the ability to read blocks, and make cuts, both in this package, as well as on screen plays. However, even though I think the Bills may list him on the depth chart as a QB again this year, by no means do I consider him a viable backup, to actual run a pro-style (sorta) offense and not get our receivers killed. He hasn’t shown a lot of ball velocity on the few plays we have seen him in our primary offense, but he was a 1st down machine from our versions of the “Wildcat”. I think he will resume that role, and hopefully with Coach Lee’s help, he can make some strides, and be a viable threat to our opponents once again.
Offensive Line, by position
LT- The left tackle covers the QB’s blind side, and is therefore the second most important player on a team, IMO.
Demetrius Bell: Bell is injury prone. He has missed 2/3 of the potential games where he could have played. He is a pending free agent, and I WOULD re-sign him, in the hopes of having experienced depth. I think he is a prototypical RG, or maybe could be a very very good LG, if we had a need there. I am happy to leave him as LT depth, LG depth, and a potential RG starter, should there be a need there. (I will further speculate why, in a moment.) I would re-sign Bell for around 4 years, and 14 million, but only 3 in guarantees, so that if after a season he proves again to be ineffective due to injury, he can be cut, and save all but about 5 of that deal. If he would not accept this deal, I would let him walk.
Chris Hairston: Hairston has the size, length, and intelligence to be a starting LT. In the long term, should we land a STUD LT in the draft, he can be a RT, or a guard, on either side. He might have better skills to move inside, as some think he is too weak in his lower body. I think he plays with good technique. CJ Spiller ran behind him much of his college career, with great success.
LG- I think interior lineman are smaller needs, and that many guys have shown capable, even though they might be undersized (Levitre), oversized (Urbik) or just not drafted early (Rinehart)
Andy Levitre: Andy is a Pro- Bowl caliber player. (What do we call them now, All-pros? If there is NO Pro Bowl moving forward, of course…) He has proven to be one of our best linemen. Though Chan might have over assessed his versatility, he surely has played really well, given his relatively small size for an NFL offensive Lineman. I guess we will keep him. ;)
Chad Rinehart: Chad has proven effective in depth, and maybe even a capable starter. I have no issue here. Keep him.
Center: An NFL center is responsible for keeping the O-Line on the same page, and communicating the protections that the QB wants.
Eric Wood: Wood, could be a great NFL pivot if he can stay healthy, and on the field. Most fans would agree, he is one of our best players, a finisher, and more than capable, as an NFL center. I would like to see him succeed long term, because of the time, money, and hope that we have invested.
Right Guard: You might have noticed I don’t list a backup for center. That is because our best center backup, is right guard Craig Urbik. I too, would try and limit my linemen to 7, as OBD has tried. By carrying versatile lineman, injuries might not hinder us too badly. I think it logical to note, that OL might create need #2- if an injury occurs, that leaves us with 5 or 6 capable of suiting up. For my purposes, I will provide 7.
Kraig Urbik: I was NOT a fan of Urbik. I thought he was slow, heavy footed, didn’t play with a lot of leverage, and that Wood was trying too hard to pick up his slack throughout the pre-season. Either I was misinterpreting assignments, or he became a whole new player, because I now feel that Urbik has as much potential at center, as right guard. I think that potential amounts to…. A TON. He can be a starting center in Wood’s absence, and Rinehart (or even Demetrius Bell, as I feel could be a GREAT right guard) would then be the backup at this position as well.
Colin Brown: LOL. I have nothing more. HE GONE!! I don’t see him as a center, a RG, or a tackle, at all. As we don’t need a 6’7” monster for a LG, and he isn’t athletic enough to be a RT, I see no reason to have him.
Right Tackle: The “other” bookend, the right tackle is taking on the weaker of the two pass rushers generally, but is just as necessary in ensuring the interior linemen (specifically the RG) can double team in the middle, so they need to match up one on one against the defender, consistently.
Erik Pears. Pears had been underwhelming to me… but as he completed each and every game on a line that helped post the least sacks of a QB in the league, he is obviously capable. He is signed for the next few years, and I think that we could use backup for him, in the next couple years, but that Bell/Hairston can potentially hold this role, keeping us at 7.
Sam Young: cut, if we re-sign Bell. He won’t necessarily be picked up by anyone else anyway, and we can always carry a prospective tackle on the practice squad. His release doesn’t necessarily create a need.
This means, Hairston, Levitre, Wood, Urbik, Pears would start. Bell would backup LT, RT (and in my reality RG) while Rinehart will backup LG/RG. If Wood were NOT capable of playing, this would create need #3, potentially filled by Sam Young (who I haven’t seen enough of to say he can’t play, but also haven’t seen enough of to say he CAN.)
Feel free to ask any questions as they relate to this post, and understand also, that the WR,RB,TE post is almost ready, and will address questions related. I also intend to address the "needs" mentioned, at the end of this post, to sum up "Offense" before moving on to, the D. I need more time for that, because honestly... I am just not prepared for this 43 switch yet. Hahaha. That said, I am going to muddle through it, find the silver linings (however few there may be) and try and find my perspective on the upwind side of the fence.
Just another great fan opinion shared on the pages of BuffaloRumblings.com.
38 comments
|
5 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Great job! Nice work buddy
Im glad to be the 1st to comment on such a well thought out idea amd discussion.
I too am opinionated and have a lot of crazy ideas, and it’s good to see someone else lay it out on the line.
Enough of the mushy stuff haha. Why do u think Bell can play G?
I think Bell, is the prototype size for a RG, and has athleticism and finesse to play LG
I think he obviously lacks in some strength, more in his upper body, than his footwork. He is athletic, yes, but he is far from refined in technique for me. But, put him in a phone booth, and I think he would excel. He is not strong enough to hold the point as a center, but he has the movement skills/size of a typical RG in the NFL (6’5" 308). As a RT, he would not be a true “mauler” and he doesn’t always play with great leverage, and his more “finesse” style translates better as a left side player, but there is no way I would start him over Levitre, who is too sound of a player to be unseated.
ABAYARDE IS NOSTRADAMUS JUST WATCH WE WILL NOT YIEALD TO NOBODY YOUR SOUL WE WILL TAKE
by ThaRealTruth on Feb 12, 2012 4:42 PM EST up reply actions
thank you also "Doc"
for this:
it’s good to see someone else lay it out on the line.
I am opening myself up to some skepticism, and some shots especially with the poll. 20% think I am boring/stupid, and another 20% think I am long winded. 100% of that 40% are mean. hahaha.
Seriously though, I am happy to see more than half people who have read (though DIDN’T comment :P) at least found it interesting enough for another segment.
ABAYARDE IS NOSTRADAMUS JUST WATCH WE WILL NOT YIEALD TO NOBODY YOUR SOUL WE WILL TAKE
by ThaRealTruth on Feb 12, 2012 5:15 PM EST up reply actions
I agree with most of this....nice read
I don’t see the Bills taking an OT high in the draft. I do see them continuing to dumpster dive for depth, and why not….it seems to be working for them. And yes, if Bell wants starting LT money, it doesn’t make sense to give it to him if Hairston can be our starter….trouble is, Hairston has question marks too. I wish we had one more season to see if Bell can hold off Hairston for the starting job and stay healthy the whole season. Would it make sense to franchise Bell?
If the Pro Bowl goes away, we can’t call players All Pros instead because, if I am remembering correctly, All Pro already means that you are the best player in the NFL at your position. For example, there where many Pro Bowl CBs this year but only one All Pro CB.
"Ability may get you to the top, but it takes character to keep you there." - John Wooden
"Do not repeat the tactics which have gained you one victory, but let your methods be regulated by the infinite variety of circumstances." - Sun Tzu
thanks Joe
appreciate it. I really it is a shade wordy, but, that is obviously just my style. I think the thing I was most curious about, is whether we can keep Bell on a frugal salary. I mean, it is tough to write a deal with escalators, for a lineman, who is part of a unit, and doesn’t get a whole lot of individual stats, and I feel that maybe he isn’t as much of an unknown, as he could be. I am most interested in how things work out with him. I would try and keep him, but nowhere near “starter” money, because truthfully, I see him battling it out pretty evenly with Hairston in the preseason. Which mean, is a 4th round rookie is even of SIMILAR talent level, then why would we overpay, to have him maybe not even win the starting job. While I agree Hairston has question marks, I feel as though his repetitions, an offseason training program, increased familiarity with the processes day in and day out, that he will make a jump, because this is his natural position, he has the intelligence for it, the size for it, the length for it, and I am biased: I called his selection, after SCREAMING at the Bills for not taking him, when they selected Searcy. I have commented on this many times, but yeah, I like him, he is my favorite lineman in regards to upside. Wood has demonstrated his ability, as have Levitre, but they are hitting (or should be) hitting their prime, and Hairston “held his own” to me, with those guys- so it seems like he could improve vastly, since he already has such a good platform to launch from.
ABAYARDE IS NOSTRADAMUS JUST WATCH WE WILL NOT YIEALD TO NOBODY YOUR SOUL WE WILL TAKE
by ThaRealTruth on Feb 12, 2012 5:01 PM EST up reply actions
Well, here's an idea...
They could sign him to a contract that gives him 2 mill per year and:
200K for every game he plays in.
That’s 5.2 mill a year IF he stays healthy. Of course, his agent would never go for that.
And some stupid team will probably offer him a 5 year, 45 mill contract with 25 guaranteed.
"My new cat just farted on my lap. Smells like Bills football." BG.
by SERGEANT MAJOR THOR on Feb 12, 2012 5:14 PM EST up reply actions
great idea
and it still keeps him around what I feel so far he has DEMONSTRATED as being worth. If he plays like a total stud this year, and/or next, we can just reapproach the contract at that point; I don’t see why we should have to provide him a huge paycheck, on “good faith” when we don’t have a TON of evidence that he really is capable.
Some stupid team might, and they could end up getting a solid starter for years to come. I totally agree that is possible. That said, WE might already have a solid starter for years to come, and if not, for all I know- they will just find some other crazy athletic guy, who is better than most thought, and find a way for him to be outstanding. Pears used to be a LT also, and is locked up long term, but I just don’t see them moving him after starting the RT spot the whole season, consistently and without injury.
ABAYARDE IS NOSTRADAMUS JUST WATCH WE WILL NOT YIEALD TO NOBODY YOUR SOUL WE WILL TAKE
by ThaRealTruth on Feb 12, 2012 5:19 PM EST up reply actions
I think we are on the same page
then why would we overpay, to have him maybe not even win the starting job.
I’m not a big Bell supporter, but your idea that he could play some interior positions combined with the tendency of the majority of our Oline to miss games made me wonder if it would be worth overpaying Bell (franchise tag) for one year to see if he could: A – stay healthy….and B – play guard if he gets beat out by Hairston.
"Ability may get you to the top, but it takes character to keep you there." - John Wooden
"Do not repeat the tactics which have gained you one victory, but let your methods be regulated by the infinite variety of circumstances." - Sun Tzu
by Joe P. on Feb 12, 2012 6:42 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
it is certainly as good an idea as any.
I wouldn’t think that it was a bad idea unless it was upwards of 6-7 million to pay for that year. I suspect it is lower (4-5) it accomplishes the same goal: a year for him to show why he, not Hairston, might be the solution long term.
"mmmm... Glen honey, I have a question for you... What do you do for a living?"
"I have a question for you, too. Why are you still here?" ~ Glen Quagmire (Giggity Giggity Giggity Goo!)
by ThaRealTruth on Feb 12, 2012 7:38 PM EST up reply actions
Looks like we have a Family Guy fan blogging,
Diggity, Diggity!
"A Patriots loss is a Bills win" - TheAfghanTwighlight
by The Buffalo Kid on Feb 12, 2012 12:37 PM EST reply actions
While I AM a FG fan
the “diggity” is in reference more to my former username.
Quagmire is the man though. Giggity Giggity.
ABAYARDE IS NOSTRADAMUS JUST WATCH WE WILL NOT YIEALD TO NOBODY YOUR SOUL WE WILL TAKE
by ThaRealTruth on Feb 12, 2012 4:44 PM EST up reply actions
I saw in another thread you linked to the song “Der Kommissar”. I was unable to post at the time, but I was gonna say, I can’t believe you didn’t link to this version..
by BuffaloBlueBlood on Feb 13, 2012 11:55 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
hahha
i was only linking due to someone else’s “Falco” references.
"mmmm... Glen honey, I have a question for you... What do you do for a living?"
"I have a question for you, too. Why are you still here?" ~ Glen Quagmire (Giggity Giggity Giggity Goo!)
by ThaRealTruth on Feb 13, 2012 5:27 PM EST up reply actions
nice post
personly I Iike the long and in depth posts so KEEP THEM COMING.
Please base your arguments in provable facts instead of pulling stuff out of your rear. -CanadianBillsFan- This is why talk is cheap because the supply always exceeds the demand.
thanks
mmmm... Glen honey, I have a question for you... What do you do for a living?
I got a question for you too; Why are you still here??!?! ~ Glen Quagmire (Giggity Giggity Giggity Goo!)
by ThaRealTruth on Feb 12, 2012 6:24 PM EST up reply actions
i like the post, although i disagree with some of the assessments / decisions.
the one that stands out to me is the colin brown bashing. what did he do to warrant such heavy criticism? he was a depth guy last year. he only got called into action when everyone around him got hurt, and i thought he actually played well when he got the chance. whats the harm in keeping him in camp and letting him fight for a roster spot again exactly?
although i never drank the jasper cool-aid, i think he should be on here. he was added to the bills active roster at the end of the season, after all. hell be fighting for that reserve interior spot with brown, vermiglio, williams, and whoever else they bring in.
last point is about thigpen. bills cut him, and then what happens if/when fitzpatrick gets hurt? a rookie steps in? a low-end free agent QB? does the season rest in the hands of brad smith under center? thigpens no star, but not many teams have legit studs as their second string QBs (hell, not many teams have studs as their starting QB). what do the bills gain by cutting him? he is a seasoned backup who has previously been very productive in chan gaileys system. i dont think you can expect a whole lot more out of a backup QB. thigpen has only had one season where he got the chance to really play. it was with chan gailey in 2008. please take a moment to look at thigpen’s stat line from 2008:
http://www.buffalobills.com/team/roster/Tyler-Thigpen/1c8f0463-77fc-4842-9898-231ae834a895
what makes you so sure that thigpen couldnt replicate that production in chan gaileys system again if he were pressed into action? his poor showing with 8 passing attempts in garbage time of 2011 is not nearly a compelling enough argument to cut him outright.
Its fun to think quarterback, but i think the odds of nix taking one in the first are close to 0%.
the one that stands out to me is the colin brown bashing. what did he do to warrant such heavy criticism? he was a depth guy last year. he only got called into action when everyone around him got hurt, and i thought he actually played well when he got the chance. whats the harm in keeping him in camp and letting him fight for a roster spot again exactly?
I didn’t bash him in any way shape or form. Fundamentally, he will be a roster spot victim. He is way too big and slow to be much more than a swing tackle, to me. What I saw of him, we inconsistent at best, and more like consistent awful, in his limited action. Can he improve? Sure. Maybe. But, he doesn’t provide anything that other guys who ARE worth keeping, already provide. IDK if he could be practice squad fodder, as it is easier for me to junk him. I really saw little that said to me “this guy is too good to not be on the team”. I only watched those games a half dozen times though, so maybe I missed something.
Jasper would be on here, along with the two rookie OLs (Vermiglio, Williams) if i had an opinion. I action open the next segment with their honerable mention, along with a lack of providing an assessment that is little more than guesswork, with nothing to back it up. I am already leaving myself open to be questioned, and I figured if someone wanted to ask, I can provide my opinion. Also, this post is pretty long, and some jerks fellow Rumblers have already suggested this piece was long, and boring, and that I am dumb. So, I figure, as long as I was as concise as I could be, others could always ask.
what makes you so sure that thigpen couldnt replicate that production in chan gaileys system again if he were pressed into action? his poor showing with 8 passing attempts in garbage time of 2011 is not nearly a compelling enough argument to cut him outright.
I am more than familiar with his stats. Thanks for the link, but I have read it. So, then use his career stats, and his draft position. I don’t think there is enough that he can be accredited for in that last system, on that team, that didn’t come from a fair amount of talent already in place. They had a true #1, a solid RB, a few early selections on the line… and he was still only mediocre. He is a system guy, he isn’t the answer, he is not competition to our starter. He is fodder. SO, I would cut him. You don’t have to agree.
"mmmm... Glen honey, I have a question for you... What do you do for a living?"
"I have a question for you, too. Why are you still here?" ~ Glen Quagmire (Giggity Giggity Giggity Goo!)
by ThaRealTruth on Feb 12, 2012 7:50 PM EST up reply actions
haha youre right. i dont agree. as far as i can tell, youre taking a black/white approach to the roster with the way u want to handle thigpen and brown. “well they arent starting caliber, so they should be cut”. i just dont understand how that mentality. by the same logic, justin rodgers should be cut immediately, because he isnt direct competition for the starter. david nelson is a system guy, and is only effective from the slot. does that make him fodder? of course not.
dont get me wrong, i like this post. solid basis for a discussion. but we obviously have very different opinions on the value of some of the guys on the back end of roster.
Its fun to think quarterback, but i think the odds of nix taking one in the first are close to 0%.
oops. I lied
Iactionactually open the next segment with their honerable mention, along with a lack of providing an assessment that is little more than guesswork, with nothing to back it up.
I didn’t do this. I will address the big picture in due time, and am more than open to any further discussion. Sorry Boom, if I seemed abrasive in my other response; I really just was trying to relay that of course there are facets I haven’t addressed yet, and that I wanted to see what kind of feedback I would get in each section. I appreciate your comments, and view, and hope to address them fully, in the long term. At least, you took the time to comment, rather than just choosing “You’re dumb.” and then leaving it at that.
"mmmm... Glen honey, I have a question for you... What do you do for a living?"
"I have a question for you, too. Why are you still here?" ~ Glen Quagmire (Giggity Giggity Giggity Goo!)
by ThaRealTruth on Feb 13, 2012 8:39 PM EST up reply actions
and he was still only mediocre
“only mediocre” is a more important phrase there than you think. mediocre NFL quarterback play will not be all that easy to find with a rookie or a new free agent. if thigpen can be a mediocre quarterback in chan gaileys system, that gives him real value to the team as a back up QB.
Its fun to think quarterback, but i think the odds of nix taking one in the first are close to 0%.
will not be all that easy to find with a rookie or a new free agent.
we shall see, I guess, won’t we?
"mmmm... Glen honey, I have a question for you... What do you do for a living?"
"I have a question for you, too. Why are you still here?" ~ Glen Quagmire (Giggity Giggity Giggity Goo!)
by ThaRealTruth on Feb 12, 2012 8:43 PM EST up reply actions
i see my other response was deleted, though I think it was entirely valid
by the same logic, justin rodgers should be cut immediately, because he isnt direct competition for the starter. david nelson is a system guy, and is only effective from the slot. does that make him fodder? of course not.
At no point had I brought them into the picture. I don’t agree with your inference. These are unfounded assumptions made about my perspective. I never said that “non-starters” aren’t worth carrying on the roster. What I WILL say, is that the hope would be that any player on the roster, are COULD BE starters. Otherwise, I don’t see why they are on the roster. I would consider Tyler Thigpen one of these players. He is not going to win us games, more consistently than he would cost us games, IMO. You think otherwise, and I can accept that. I just don’t agree.
"mmmm... Glen honey, I have a question for you... What do you do for a living?"
"I have a question for you, too. Why are you still here?" ~ Glen Quagmire (Giggity Giggity Giggity Goo!)
by ThaRealTruth on Feb 14, 2012 12:37 AM EST up reply actions
Most assuredly, there will be some things you don’t agree with.
obviously this was one:
what happens if/when fitzpatrick gets hurt? a rookie steps in? a low-end free agent QB?
This would be why it creates need #1, which you obviously must feel, doesn’t exist. I feel, it exists with or without Thigpen on the roster. Therefore:
… I will follow up with a few more posts, to cover the remainder of the offense, as well as the entire defense, and my impressions moving into the draft.
So, since I do acknowledge it as a need, and mention there will be follow up… I intend to give you my solution, to said problem. Rest assured, I feel it is equally as big of a problem, with Thigpen on the roster.
"mmmm... Glen honey, I have a question for you... What do you do for a living?"
"I have a question for you, too. Why are you still here?" ~ Glen Quagmire (Giggity Giggity Giggity Goo!)
by ThaRealTruth on Feb 12, 2012 8:01 PM EST up reply actions
Good read, Rec.
I too have no confidence in Thigpen. I’m glad George Wilson let that ball hit him in the helmet up in Canada.
I like Bell, and I like the deal you put out there. I think we’ll have to pay more than that to keep him though. Personally, I would pay UN poco more.
by BuffaloBlueBlood on Feb 13, 2012 12:05 PM EST via mobile reply actions
yawn – where’s the RBs and receivers? or TE’s?
why even mention Tyler Thigpen? his suckage is making my keyboard fail as I type this.
What about Michael Jasper? You talk o-line then no mention of Jasper? He’s going to be a future pro bowl G and NT and possibly FS yet you don’t talk about him? What?
I love this plan! I'm excited to be a part of it! LET'S DO IT! - Venkman
yawn?
It is somehow my fault, that our OL and QBs are boring?
yeah… Jasper…. I will get to him… eventually. I didn’t mention any of the non-contributors, I realize.
"mmmm... Glen honey, I have a question for you... What do you do for a living?"
"I have a question for you, too. Why are you still here?" ~ Glen Quagmire (Giggity Giggity Giggity Goo!)
by ThaRealTruth on Feb 13, 2012 5:28 PM EST up reply actions
ya I totally just yawned you man – step up your game
I love this plan! I'm excited to be a part of it! LET'S DO IT! - Venkman
by J2 on Feb 13, 2012 7:17 PM EST up reply actions
i stand by my belief that subject is the reason for the lack of excitement. Not a whole lot on this roster to be all “WOO HOO!!!” about. Unless you disagree, and feel I missed something… feel free to add legitimate thoughts. Other than the lack of RB/WR/TE… which I did add would come later. Besides: If you are yawning now, would you really want to read another 3 pages of player analysis in this same post? Quite a few others are impatient as well. But the fact is… this is a ‘series’ on purpose, with the intention of not “glazing over” someone that might already be overlooked by our staff. I wouldn’t do that, as a GM… SO, i am giving each their just deserve.
"mmmm... Glen honey, I have a question for you... What do you do for a living?"
"I have a question for you, too. Why are you still here?" ~ Glen Quagmire (Giggity Giggity Giggity Goo!)
by ThaRealTruth on Feb 13, 2012 7:25 PM EST up reply actions
isn’t it just deserts?
where’d you go to H.S.? Sisters of the poor academy? glad I didn’t go there…. jeez. read a book or something
anyway good article
I love this plan! I'm excited to be a part of it! LET'S DO IT! - Venkman
by J2 on Feb 13, 2012 7:35 PM EST up reply actions
Deserts? or Desserts? Something.
Thanks. I spent a buncha time on the series, and each part, is kinda weak without the whole, but I doubted I would get much more feedback on a single 20+ page post. I did learn, that over half of the readers though, are enjoying them, so I shall continue. Besides, I have the time, and I enjoy the subject.
"mmmm... Glen honey, I have a question for you... What do you do for a living?"
"I have a question for you, too. Why are you still here?" ~ Glen Quagmire (Giggity Giggity Giggity Goo!)
by ThaRealTruth on Feb 13, 2012 8:33 PM EST up reply actions
lol – deserts. Those are tasty right?
i’m just busting your balls – relax.
FWIW – it inspired me to make a non-yawn type of thread. Enjoy!
I love this plan! I'm excited to be a part of it! LET'S DO IT! - Venkman
by J2 on Feb 13, 2012 8:39 PM EST up reply actions
i’m just busting your balls – relax.
I literally couldn’t be more relaxed, without my pants off. Not sure where this is coming from.
FWIW – it inspired me to make a non-yawn type of thread. Enjoy!
Always read them, though, sometimes they make me wonder why you, or anyone, is a Bills fan. Perhaps one, with, less material that leads to say, Idk…. suicide? I mean, even I don’t think it is ever quite as bad as you make it out to be. We still got some football players on this team. Just not 53. More like…. 3 or even 5.
"mmmm... Glen honey, I have a question for you... What do you do for a living?"
"I have a question for you, too. Why are you still here?" ~ Glen Quagmire (Giggity Giggity Giggity Goo!)
by ThaRealTruth on Feb 13, 2012 8:42 PM EST up reply actions
I think it’s always going to be that way until someone puts up or shuts up and grabs that early QB in the 1st.
I think we’re going to have the same repetitive conversations for years until a GM goes all Atlanta on a QB or gets one to groom. As long as Fitz is the present and future not much is going to change in my opinion
I love this plan! I'm excited to be a part of it! LET'S DO IT! - Venkman
by J2 on Feb 13, 2012 8:45 PM EST up reply actions
I don't disagree
though, I feel like an early second, or some influx of talent at WR makes this roster a lot more appealing. You and I agree Fitz isn’t the answer, but the question few are asking is, are there upgrades available for other depth, without burning draft picks, or spending ridiculous money… which I feel there are. Plus, it helps the reader for me to expound on why so and so gets cut, for that prospective player moving forward. I expect to list approx 25 players for either side of the ball, leaving a handful to be “developing” on the practice squad or whatever. Truthfully, I have to look at who is even eligible, or who I think will fall victim to better talent, after the draft.
In short (not really) I expect this to be my launching point, for what I hope the roster to resemble at the start of this coming season.
"mmmm... Glen honey, I have a question for you... What do you do for a living?"
"I have a question for you, too. Why are you still here?" ~ Glen Quagmire (Giggity Giggity Giggity Goo!)
by ThaRealTruth on Feb 13, 2012 8:59 PM EST up reply actions
It’s you’re Hobbit lol. Can’t wait for that one tho
I think it’s funny that Buddy is, almost, doing what I wanted him to do in regards to building a roster. Build the trenches (Dareus, Sheppard, Troup, Carrington, Hairston) through the draft, acquire good football players (Spiller, Williams), get better and be patient.
I’m unwilling to be patient because it’s boring basically but other than QB decisions and odd personnel decisions I really can’t fault them at all for the philosophy thus far. Sure getting pressure is critical but we have some solid, solid positions. Buddy building from the inside out this year should come to fruition from that POV. Dareus/Williams as long as their both healthy are going to be a nightmare for offensive lines. Our offensive interior 3 are all good football players when healthy. So he’s built the football side of his equation and now he’s gotta fix outside the football which i’m sure he’s going to do.
I love this plan! I'm excited to be a part of it! LET'S DO IT! - Venkman
by J2 on Feb 13, 2012 9:07 PM EST up reply actions
hahaha kinda.
it is long winded enough to be Tolkien. haha.
His approach is correct, and given the nature of the past few drafts, I feel he has found value, in most rounds, and where he MIGHT have “reached” the prospects have flashed enough ability to be a realistic candidate to improve the roster.
I agree that edge defense (we need safeties now too, as well as more man corners, as I have been pointing out for quite some time) is going to be a significant focus, and I feel like weapons are a priority as well. I think philosophy of system, hides deficiencies, but that is what good systems do for teams. I think too, that though I don’t love the 43 switch, it could mean more instant improvement, and opportunity for future growth, rather than trying to force square pegs into round holes.
"mmmm... Glen honey, I have a question for you... What do you do for a living?"
"I have a question for you, too. Why are you still here?" ~ Glen Quagmire (Giggity Giggity Giggity Goo!)
by ThaRealTruth on Feb 13, 2012 9:21 PM EST up reply actions
I think too, that though I don’t love the 43 switch, it could mean more instant improvement, and opportunity for future growth, rather than trying to force square pegs into round holes.
and that’s all it is too. I argued the switch point but it doesn’t matter we’re in almost a perfect position to run a 43. He may have reached on Troup but that would be it – he’s gotten good value. He will continue that I think – he’ll yield a bunch of good football players in his tenure. Success or not
I love this plan! I'm excited to be a part of it! LET'S DO IT! - Venkman
by J2 on Feb 13, 2012 9:28 PM EST up reply actions
i agree with all this.
I don’t know that I agree in “perfect position” to run the 43, but for certain, the pool of players is larger, and our relative needs don’t increase (much) so it isn’t as dumb an idea as my initial reactions either. That said, I do feel that the 34 brings inherent capabilities the 43 doesn’t, and veteran QBs have a far easier time reading the 43 because it is less versatile,and harder to disguise.
"mmmm... Glen honey, I have a question for you... What do you do for a living?"
"I have a question for you, too. Why are you still here?" ~ Glen Quagmire (Giggity Giggity Giggity Goo!)
by ThaRealTruth on Feb 13, 2012 9:41 PM EST up reply actions

by 





























