Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Eden Hazard In London For Medical, According To Reports

Mel Kiper 2012 NFL Mock Draft: Courtney Upshaw To Buffalo

ESPN's Mel Kiper has released his latest 2012 NFL Mock Draft, and in it, he's penciled Alabama outside linebacker Courtney Upshaw into the Buffalo Bills' No. 10 overall pick, despite the 3-4 outside linebacker's not being a snug fit for their new 4-3 defense.

Kiper points to last year's Denver Broncos as rationale for predicting Upshaw to Buffalo. Poised to switch from the 3-4 defense to the 4-3 with new coach John Fox, the Broncos still saw fit to draft the top available pass-rusher, 3-4 outside linebacker prospect Von Miller, with the No. 2 overall pick. The idea is that coaches will bend their schemes to fit pass rushers, and that's the idea Kiper is pointing to with Upshaw and Buffalo.

Upshaw is not a snug fit as a 4-3 prospect - he can play some end, but is better suited to be a 3-4 linebacker - but the Bills need a pass rusher, and Upshaw is a pretty good one. This is an idea we discussed back in late January: the Bills are so desperate for pass-rushing help that they shouldn't pass up a good one for a lesser one because of their defensive alignment.

Kiper also calls Upshaw an "energetic talent," says he's in the mold of a "more athletic LaMarr Woodley," and believes he'll be ready to harass opposing quarterbacks as a rookie.

Comment 121 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Well although Upshaw isnt my favorite player at 10......

It would not be the most horrible move the Bills could make.

A solid defender and pass rusher from an SEC championship defense.

Experienced.

Used to winning.

Played under a coach which is familiar with NFL defensive schemes.

Could do a lot worse I suppose.

The score dictated they pass

by norcaliangelsfan on Feb 15, 2012 2:30 PM EST reply actions  

but what if the bills could also do a lot better? i have never (and still dont) believe upshaw is remotely worth that draft choice, even if the bills are married to picking the ‘best pass rusher available’

Its fun to think quarterback, but i think the odds of nix taking one in the first are close to 0%.

by boomsauce on Feb 15, 2012 2:32 PM EST up reply actions  

He's not my personal first choice either.....

I’m just trying to not be negative about the idea.

Like I am about many other things. :-)

The score dictated they pass

by norcaliangelsfan on Feb 15, 2012 2:34 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

i like Upshaw

any that are clinging to the hope of a QB are in fantasy land. Buffalo allowed 28+/gm , at that rate Buffalo will lose continuously . who has the most S.B. rings ??? oh right that team … Pittsburg . how did they win was it their wonderful QB or their defense .

by ONEREALMAN on Feb 15, 2012 3:44 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Keep living in the past man

The teams that win today are those teams with a franchise qb. Both the patriots and packers had the worst defenses in 2011 and both made the playoffs 1 went to the Super Bowl. Even the giants defense wasn’t that good this year, but their team got hot down the stretch (much like they did in 2008) and they won it all. A good defense helps but the teams that continuously are in the playoffs have one thing in common: A DAMN FRANCHISE QB! It’s time the bills get with it and take a shot at one or be bold and trade up to get one.

"I promise you, ... When I come back, I'm going to be like a mad dog in a meat house." -Takeo Spikes

by panekattack on Feb 15, 2012 4:38 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

God I am glad you aren't in our FO...

QBQBQBQBQBQB, that seems to be all some think of on here. Having a ‘franchise QB’ is gonna do jack if we have all these other holes. We have to STOP points too! Stop having a panekattack and relax, there isn’t a franchise QB on the board that we wouldn’t hafta break the bank for, but a good defense to add to the pieces we have are. Why force this?? Get Upshaw at 10, and try to trade back inot the late first round thru NE and nab Hightower! Now that’s a scary front, and our secondary won’t be left hanging! We HAD a top 5 offense early in the season, I think some people forget this. I hate the fact we went 1-8 towards the end, but lack of ‘Franchise QB’ wasn’t the whole problem. Chill..

'Fight on my men' Sir Andrew said, 'A little I am hurt but not yet slain, I'll just lie here and bleed a while. Then I'll rise and fight again!'

by Mikey5275 on Feb 15, 2012 5:29 PM EST up reply actions   2 recs

Rec’d and agreed, though I’m tired of trying to iterate that point.

"Slowly all the roles we act out become our identity. And in the end we are what we pretend to be." - Jerry Cantrell.

by stetzwebs on Feb 15, 2012 6:49 PM EST up reply actions  

Obviously a QB isn’t going to come in and magically fix all our problems.

Odds are, they will do nothing more than hold a clipboard. I want my first round pick on the field, making an impact. However- Chan has basically ignored when a guy was selected (Maybin, Spiller) and put the “best player” (yeah right) on the field. Even if we take that QB, he will do nothing to address our other needs. That is the only reason I don’t care if we select one early. the ONLY reason to do so, is that we could think that we won’t pick early enough for a great one, but IMO- 10 isn’t early enough to get a great one… this year.

"He is a man of courage who does not run away, but remains at his post and fights against the enemy."

~Socrates

by ThaRealTruth on Feb 15, 2012 6:57 PM EST up reply actions  

I want my first round pick on the field, making an impact.

packer fans were saying something eerily similar when aaron rodgers was selected.

Its fun to think quarterback, but i think the odds of nix taking one in the first are close to 0%.

by boomsauce on Feb 15, 2012 9:32 PM EST up reply actions  

ONE exception

doesn’t make the rule.Otherwise people would take shorter QBs more often, looking for a Drew Brees. Rodgers also was in the conversation for #1 overall pick, and how he fell THAT far, is crazy to me.

Keep in mind too- we don’t pick at the end of the draft. We pick 10. Where Luck and RG3 will already be gone, and the rest of the available QBs, are probably a reach.

"He is a man of courage who does not run away, but remains at his post and fights against the enemy."

~Socrates

by ThaRealTruth on Feb 15, 2012 9:55 PM EST up reply actions  

ya i didnt mean to make it seem like rodgers working out so well for the packers is typical.. i guess i just wanted to point out that GMs need to worry about the future of the team as well as the present. if a QB is there that buddy nix feels can be a stud NFL quarterback, then he shouldnt hesitate at all to make the pick- even if it doesnt help the 2011 bills at all.

Its fun to think quarterback, but i think the odds of nix taking one in the first are close to 0%.

by boomsauce on Feb 15, 2012 9:57 PM EST up reply actions  

oh, for sure.

but I am operating under the assumption that so far, other than the top 2, many of the remaining QBs have more questions, than Aaron Rodgers had. I still wonder how teams could have passed on him, but then, need drives the league (like it or not) and somehow, QB wasn’t the priority that year. I don’t understand how, but IT DID HAPPEN.

I realize you didn’t mean it as typical. I only bring up his being an “exception” because though selecting a QB early is a good rule of thumb, you are still only likely to get a 50/50 shot at him working out, and then… You have to wonder if that bigger need, with a better prospect, who makes immediate impact, shouldn’t have been the selection.

"He is a man of courage who does not run away, but remains at his post and fights against the enemy."

~Socrates

by ThaRealTruth on Feb 15, 2012 10:03 PM EST up reply actions  

Aaron Rodgers

How many years did Rodgers ride the pine before his turn come around

by ONEREALMAN on Feb 15, 2012 11:30 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Nice

KT, nice. You and Jaeger are alway’s good reads.

Don't Worry, Be Happy!

by buffalobacker on Feb 15, 2012 10:07 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree with none of this.....

The Bills hierarchy clearly think they can win a superbowl with Fitzy. They would be insane not to. Nobody looks for an OK QB to win them some games until they get a real QB.
The facts are QBs worse than FItz have already won super bowls. If Fitz broke ribs last year, and I think he did, it would account for a lot of bad games. Fitz needs a way better option at number two receiver and Fitz still can get better.
If the BIlls sign Stevie, Bell and Chandler and sign another high quality wr and a high quality RDE before the draft, we can compete for a SB this year. No doubt about it.

Go Bills!

PodunkO - The great post ender!

by podunkowego on Feb 16, 2012 11:21 AM EST up reply actions  

Great

And I’m glad Iil Miley that you aren’t part of the front office either. In looking long term, I want to be in the playoffs yr after yr not just one and done. Hate to burst your bubble but fitz is not a franchise qb and was part of the reason this team finished 1-8 down the stretch. I love how much credit and exemption fitz gets from some people when the team started out hot fitz was amazing and the only reason why the team played so well but when the team struggled and failed to put up points against the jets and dolphins it wasn’t fitz’s fault it’s the defense or his receivers (the very same receivers and defense that he was doing amazing with). Do I think fitz is a bad qb? Not at all he’s a great bridge qb to hold over the position while you grab your qb of the future (a la Jon kitna). Until we get a real franchise qb it will continue to be our teams biggest need. Does that mean we should take one every other year? Not at all but that doesn’t mean we should ignore the position all together. Drafting upshaw and Hightower isn’t going to magically fix the defense or turn us into regular playoff contenders. Actually it will just make it harder to find our franchise qb because we will be picking (presumably) later in the draft. I’d rather get one now or trade up to get one (rg lll) while we can rather than continue to put it off. But that’s ok lil mikey you keep living in dream world where fitz is franchise and a defense with upshaw and Hightower magically turns into a top 5 unit.

"I promise you, ... When I come back, I'm going to be like a mad dog in a meat house." -Takeo Spikes

by panekattack on Feb 15, 2012 9:46 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Having a ‘franchise QB’ is gonna do jack if we have all these other holes

but franchise QB is also a hole. it just happens to be both the most important one and most difficult to fill by a country mile, which is why a lot of fans think quarterback should be a big priority.
you could easily argue that filling all those holes ‘is gonna do jack’ if the bills continue on without a franchise quarterback, no? each season guys retire, or get hurt, or leave in FA. point is that all these position players will come and go with some frequency. however, a franchise QB can be that rock in the center of your team, keeping you in the playoff hunt year in and year out regardless of what happens around him. no other single position can do that.

Its fun to think quarterback, but i think the odds of nix taking one in the first are close to 0%.

by boomsauce on Feb 15, 2012 10:02 PM EST up reply actions   2 recs

franchise QB is also a hole. it just happens to be both the most important one and most difficult to fill by a country mile, which is why a lot of fans think quarterback should be a big priority.

I totally agree with this. HOWEVER:

which is a bigger need? A position with NO capable starter, or the one with the guy who is the incumbent starter? I think the spot where we have NO ONE trumps the spot, that Fitz occupies. That might not be the popular view (Heaven knows I don’t care about that anyway) but it is an entirely logical one.

"He is a man of courage who does not run away, but remains at his post and fights against the enemy."

~Socrates

by ThaRealTruth on Feb 15, 2012 10:05 PM EST up reply actions  

At the same time, there have been 48 Super Bowls now. The Steelers have won six SBs in the 20 years where Bradshaw or Roethlisberger were starting for them and a big zero in their other 28 years of post SB existence. It’s easy to say that Buffalo needs a better defense because they do, but that doesn’t reduce their need to find a top notch QB too. Teams without elite QBs don’t win Super Bowls just like bad defenses don’t win Super Bowls.

"You mean @TWHITNER. It’s how he prefers to be referenced." - Jon Harrington

by kaisertown on Feb 15, 2012 4:42 PM EST up reply actions   2 recs

Yup that was my point too

Recd

"I promise you, ... When I come back, I'm going to be like a mad dog in a meat house." -Takeo Spikes

by panekattack on Feb 15, 2012 4:51 PM EST up reply actions  

the steelers did not win 4 superbowls because of terry bradshaw

flayed ones stealth mode

"Fleshling! Do not shoot! For I am one of you fleshy things. It is I. Your Uncle Stan. Can't you tell by the long strips of fleshy substances covered in bodily fluids? Trust me! I have fleeeeeeeeesh."

by mob16151 on Feb 15, 2012 6:20 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

They didn’t win in spite of him either. If we won the SB, it would be in spite of Fitz.

"Slowly all the roles we act out become our identity. And in the end we are what we pretend to be." - Jerry Cantrell.

by stetzwebs on Feb 15, 2012 6:50 PM EST up reply actions  

That’s a bold statement off of a hypothetical situation. The lesser QB won the superbowl this year, because he had a great team around him. Fitz is barely used to being starter and having blocking. Imagine what it’d be like if he had an actual reciever or two, so long as you’re imagining how terrible he could be in a superbowl. We haven’t had teams that any but the most legendary of QBs could even get to the playoffs in the last few years, so how can we put so much blame on Fitz? I think that with a good defense and a few real recievers that don’t drop every damned pass that comes their way, Fitz could take us to the playoffs. Where we go from there is a mystery to me, as we’re talking about people who have never even been to the playoffs before. No way to tell how they’d react. But you know what? I"d love to see it.

by Ian MacPersonoid on Feb 16, 2012 12:29 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Of course you’d love to see it, we all would. But I have observed Fitz play for two and a half seasons now, and if this team wins a Super Bowl with him at the helm, it will be a spectacle to behold…and it will take a mighty team effort to overcome his shortcomings, hence the “in spite of” comment.

"Slowly all the roles we act out become our identity. And in the end we are what we pretend to be." - Jerry Cantrell.

by stetzwebs on Feb 16, 2012 1:28 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Maybe, but he did have top five finishes in QB rating in two of the seasons that Pittsburgh won a SB and barely missed the top five in one of the other seasons. He lead the league in yards per pass a few times, including a couple of the SB years. They certainly don’t win four Super Bowls without him.

List of Super Bowl winning QBs who never had a season where they finished in the top five of the NFL in yards per pass attempt:

Trent Dilfer: 2000/01

and that’s it. That’s the list of QBs who have won a Super Bowl and not finished a season in the top five of the entire league in yards per pass attempt. So, it’s not like mediocre talents just go out and win SBs with good defenses. If you’re not capable of being one of the best, then you’re not winning a SB. Even Terry Bradshaw is proof of that because Pittsburgh has never won a SB without him or Big Ben.

"You mean @TWHITNER. It’s how he prefers to be referenced." - Jon Harrington

by kaisertown on Feb 15, 2012 7:02 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Go look at his completion percentages

and interceptions. Terry Bradshaw is probably the least deserving QB in the HoF.

Ridiculously overrated his whole career.

flayed ones stealth mode

"Fleshling! Do not shoot! For I am one of you fleshy things. It is I. Your Uncle Stan. Can't you tell by the long strips of fleshy substances covered in bodily fluids? Trust me! I have fleeeeeeeeesh."

by mob16151 on Feb 15, 2012 7:04 PM EST up reply actions  

You’re ignoring all of the numerous other factors of his success. Eli just won a Super Bowl with bad INT numbers too, do you think he’s overrated?

The stat that most defines success for a QB is YPA. As Kaiser pointed out, Bradshaw’s were almost always good in years they won the SB.

"Slowly all the roles we act out become our identity. And in the end we are what we pretend to be." - Jerry Cantrell.

by stetzwebs on Feb 15, 2012 7:06 PM EST up reply actions  

What?

Interceptions, completion percentage, and Ypa are all important. Bradshaw threw an interception 5 percent of the time.Eli Manning throws one 3.3 percent of the time. Bradshaws career completion percentage 51.9,Mannings is 3.3. Bradshaws YPA 7.2, Mannings is 7.0.

And for fun, Rob Johnson has the same YPA, as Bradshaw. Wheres all his superbowl rings?

flayed ones stealth mode

"Fleshling! Do not shoot! For I am one of you fleshy things. It is I. Your Uncle Stan. Can't you tell by the long strips of fleshy substances covered in bodily fluids? Trust me! I have fleeeeeeeeesh."

by mob16151 on Feb 15, 2012 7:12 PM EST up reply actions  

Mannings completion percentage is

58.4 I mean.

Bradshaw was, and remains horribly overrated.

flayed ones stealth mode

"Fleshling! Do not shoot! For I am one of you fleshy things. It is I. Your Uncle Stan. Can't you tell by the long strips of fleshy substances covered in bodily fluids? Trust me! I have fleeeeeeeeesh."

by mob16151 on Feb 15, 2012 7:13 PM EST up reply actions  

As Kaiser said, only one SB winning QB didn’t have a very high relative YPA, making it an obvious important statistic, much more important and telling than INTs or Comp %.

And I am not sure you can compare a QB from 2000 to one from the 80s. The game is much different. Kaiser was comparing Bradshaw to the other QBs of his day, a much better comparison.

"Slowly all the roles we act out become our identity. And in the end we are what we pretend to be." - Jerry Cantrell.

by stetzwebs on Feb 15, 2012 7:24 PM EST up reply actions  

*70s

"Slowly all the roles we act out become our identity. And in the end we are what we pretend to be." - Jerry Cantrell.

by stetzwebs on Feb 15, 2012 7:25 PM EST up reply actions  

And I am not sure you can compare a QB from 2000 to one from the 80s. The game is much different.

as far as statistics go, i think it is kinda like, ‘inflation’ in a way. while overall numbers like yards/ yard avg/ td might be elevated… completion percentage is a good barometer. Not “end all be all” by anymeans, but how do you NOT compare the stars of old, to the new crop of guys? I mean, plenty of all star players have existed in all the eras of the league, and if they played today, they would likely be just as competitive (I am thinking Lawrence Taylor, Barry Sanders, Jim Brown… etc etc…. these guys just are amazing. the above average guys, are still above average. You can’t take away Super Bowls/MVPs and etc for ONE group, and then give all the credit away to the “more recent” greats, and think that it isn’t slanted in some way.

In a nutshell, relative competition, brings with it relative production, and though some things are less consistent, it doesn’t make all the former greats, a buncha schlubs. Not that I think you feel that way, but the line of thinking does dismiss players of the past, simply for being in an era that wasn’t so lopsided.

"He is a man of courage who does not run away, but remains at his post and fights against the enemy."

~Socrates

by ThaRealTruth on Feb 15, 2012 7:32 PM EST up reply actions  

It doesn’t make any sense to look it in any other way, though. The only fair comparison of positional statistics is against the other players at that position from that era. QBs from the 70s are not in any way comparable to QBs of the last decade, just like WRs of the 90s (ahem) should not be compared against the current standards of WR production.

"Slowly all the roles we act out become our identity. And in the end we are what we pretend to be." - Jerry Cantrell.

by stetzwebs on Feb 15, 2012 8:34 PM EST up reply actions  

That's you opinion.

I am not saying you are wrong. Certainly it is “easier” to compare players at a position, in the same era. But I think too, that some traits, skills, ability are undeniable, and can be seen in players from any era. While I don’t want (or feel I need) to cite 47 examples of players that could compete in this league, even still today, if they had been in this era; i think you can understand (even if you don’t agree) that some players are just great, and are great players simply because they are greater than the rest. There may not be a TON of players that fall in this category, but no question to me, that if you assembled an ALL TIME team, that we wouldn’t simply pick post 90’s players. Or we shouldn’t for sure, in my opinion.

"He is a man of courage who does not run away, but remains at his post and fights against the enemy."

~Socrates

by ThaRealTruth on Feb 15, 2012 10:00 PM EST up reply actions  

That’s true, but what metrics would you use to judge the all-time players? I wouldn’t compare stats to players of today, I would look at their play in their era. Isn’t that what you’re doing when you say something like “this player is just great”? He was great during his era, and if he played today, with today’s conditioning and today’s coaching and playcalling, he would still be great. That’s true in a handful of cases, as you said, but it’s because we know how they played during their time against their competition. Can anyone ever really say a QB is the greatest QB of all time? I would disagree with just about anyone you throw at that answer, because there’s no way to tell.

"Slowly all the roles we act out become our identity. And in the end we are what we pretend to be." - Jerry Cantrell.

by stetzwebs on Feb 15, 2012 10:07 PM EST up reply actions  

i would too.

i think that there are too many variables, tangibles, and INtangibles to ever have a clear answer. It is like politics. There really isn’t a wrong/right answer for any of it. just varying degrees of acceptability, because it is a totally subjective discussion.

"He is a man of courage who does not run away, but remains at his post and fights against the enemy."

~Socrates

by ThaRealTruth on Feb 15, 2012 10:26 PM EST up reply actions  

Also, for future reference, just assume I start every post with the words “in my opinion”. Because I just assume you realize that when I post something, it’s my opinion ;)

"Slowly all the roles we act out become our identity. And in the end we are what we pretend to be." - Jerry Cantrell.

by stetzwebs on Feb 15, 2012 10:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Lol

Sorry had to stop and laugh, your funny in good way.:)

Don't Worry, Be Happy!

by buffalobacker on Feb 15, 2012 10:11 PM EST up reply actions  

Thanks BB, the feeling’s mutual. I have certainly laughed out loud at some of your posts.

"Slowly all the roles we act out become our identity. And in the end we are what we pretend to be." - Jerry Cantrell.

by stetzwebs on Feb 15, 2012 10:12 PM EST up reply actions  

and I am funny like a clown.

right?

just kidding. though, it is probably true for some. i don’t care though. I don’t live my life for other people.

"He is a man of courage who does not run away, but remains at his post and fights against the enemy."

~Socrates

by ThaRealTruth on Feb 15, 2012 10:28 PM EST up reply actions  

right.

i add IMO and in my opinion, often too, as if it wasn’t implied. Somehow, even THIS ends up being in contention with some folks. As if we were here to support someone else’s views. lol.

"He is a man of courage who does not run away, but remains at his post and fights against the enemy."

~Socrates

by ThaRealTruth on Feb 15, 2012 10:27 PM EST up reply actions  

And for fun, Rob Johnson has the same YPA, as Bradshaw. Wheres all his superbowl rings?

Career yards per attempt from a different era of football? When did Rob Johnson finish in the top 5 in yards per pass attempt, because Bradshaw did it repeatedly. Rob Johnson never had a season where he threw 100 passes and had a yards per attempt of 7 or better. Comparing career numbers aren’t going to get you anywhere when a guy like Bradshaw has such a long career.

"You mean @TWHITNER. It’s how he prefers to be referenced." - Jon Harrington

by kaisertown on Feb 15, 2012 7:28 PM EST up reply actions  

Ok then look at some of the other examples

that were named.

flayed ones stealth mode

"Fleshling! Do not shoot! For I am one of you fleshy things. It is I. Your Uncle Stan. Can't you tell by the long strips of fleshy substances covered in bodily fluids? Trust me! I have fleeeeeeeeesh."

by mob16151 on Feb 15, 2012 7:36 PM EST up reply actions  

Eli just won a Super Bowl with bad INT numbers too, do you think he’s overrated?

Yes.

by Ian MacPersonoid on Feb 16, 2012 12:32 AM EST up reply actions  

I don’t think that on teams with lesser defenses and lesser running attacks, he would even make the payoffs, whereas Tom Wunderkind Brady can take a pile of turds, 2 TEs and a Wes Welker to the Superbowl, and keep it close.

I’m not saying he isn’t any good, but he’s a shimmering example of why a legendary QB isn’t necessary to win the Superbowl, and how winning the superbowl sort of has the effect of making a QB seem legendary.

by Ian MacPersonoid on Feb 16, 2012 12:36 AM EST up reply actions   2 recs

while i don't agree with your whole view

and really, i don’t disagree with it either… this is gold:

winning the superbowl sort of has the effect of making a QB seem legendary.

recd.

"He is a man of courage who does not run away, but remains at his post and fights against the enemy."

~Socrates

by ThaRealTruth on Feb 16, 2012 12:39 AM EST up reply actions  

And winning 2 with come from behind 4 quarter drives?

Thank you thank you thank you thank you sireric for bringing the furious punching cat back into my life. - poz

by bluecollarbuffalo on Feb 16, 2012 7:45 AM EST up reply actions  

We will have to strongly disagree over that. Eli is a very good quarterback, and I would love to have him on this team.

And the Giants have a terrible running game, and had one for most of the season. Their defense was also ranked in the bottom 10 for most of the season. They got through the regular season almost squarely on Eli’s shoulders. Only once they reached the playoffs did the rest of the team start really stepping up.

"Slowly all the roles we act out become our identity. And in the end we are what we pretend to be." - Jerry Cantrell.

by stetzwebs on Feb 16, 2012 1:29 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

much better run game with bradshaw

with him injured, they had a slump. They avgd, what, like 3.5 for the season, but 4.2 in the playoffs? they obviously missed him.

I would take Eli in a heartbeat. Along with most other 1st rounders in the last 507 years. QBs have it made, to some degree, and they are preparing them for this job better than they had in the past, to me. While the offenses and systems and verbiage are maybe more complex… it is still about Xs and Os.

"He is a man of courage who does not run away, but remains at his post and fights against the enemy."

~Socrates

by ThaRealTruth on Feb 16, 2012 1:32 AM EST up reply actions  

Agree about Bradshaw, but even 4.2 isn’t great (middle of the pack). It is much better than their regular season game though.

"Slowly all the roles we act out become our identity. And in the end we are what we pretend to be." - Jerry Cantrell.

by stetzwebs on Feb 16, 2012 1:35 AM EST up reply actions  

yup.

he was a solid fantasy RB while active. anything over 4 in the playoffs is a luxury, to me. It is TOUGH to run when those guys are all jacked up, and you don’t want to be losing field position and such.

"He is a man of courage who does not run away, but remains at his post and fights against the enemy."

~Socrates

by ThaRealTruth on Feb 16, 2012 2:02 AM EST up reply actions  

Go look at every QB’s comp% and TD/INT ratio from that era. Like statzwebs points out, the one stat that most correlates with wins for QBs is yards per pass attempt and Bradshaw was one of the best of his era, arguably the best of his era, in that statistic.

"You mean @TWHITNER. It’s how he prefers to be referenced." - Jon Harrington

by kaisertown on Feb 15, 2012 7:12 PM EST up reply actions  

Heres the list of players whose careers are most similar to Bradshaws

David Garrard, Jake Delhomme, Carson Palmer, Ben Roethlisberger, Chad Pennington, Stan Humphries, Tony Romo, Aaron Brooks, Daryle Lamonica, Doug Williams

flayed ones stealth mode

"Fleshling! Do not shoot! For I am one of you fleshy things. It is I. Your Uncle Stan. Can't you tell by the long strips of fleshy substances covered in bodily fluids? Trust me! I have fleeeeeeeeesh."

by mob16151 on Feb 15, 2012 7:15 PM EST up reply actions  

Oops wrong list but looking at some Bradshaws peers

Roman Gabriel was better at completion percentage and Int’s, Len Dawson was better in ever category,hell Sonny Jurgensen who sytarted his career in the 50’s had better pure passing numbers than bradshaw

flayed ones stealth mode

"Fleshling! Do not shoot! For I am one of you fleshy things. It is I. Your Uncle Stan. Can't you tell by the long strips of fleshy substances covered in bodily fluids? Trust me! I have fleeeeeeeeesh."

by mob16151 on Feb 15, 2012 7:20 PM EST up reply actions  

You say that like Len Dawson wasn’t incredible. Yeah, Sonny Jurgensen that terrible five time All-Pro who made the all 60s team who I would personally hate to be compared to as a statistical performer. Roman Gabriel was a decent QB who was more of a game manager and it’s part of the reason he didn’t win more.

What’s even the point you’re trying to make with those comparisons?

"You mean @TWHITNER. It’s how he prefers to be referenced." - Jon Harrington

by kaisertown on Feb 15, 2012 7:25 PM EST up reply actions  

My point was all those guys were better than Bradsahw.

And if Roman Gabriel was a game manager from the same era.WHY ARE HIS NUMBERS BETTER? And you said well all QB’s from that era threw 210 career int’s, and had as low a completion percentage, which was false. You said the Steelers won 4 superbowls because of Bradshaw, they did not. You said well hs numbers are skewed because of his rookie season. He played 12 more years. You can’t say Bradshaw was elite because the man was basically slightly above average. Players from the 50’s where it was even harder to compile passing statistics, have better career numbers than him. He was a joke of a QB, and a joke of a HOF selection.

flayed ones stealth mode

"Fleshling! Do not shoot! For I am one of you fleshy things. It is I. Your Uncle Stan. Can't you tell by the long strips of fleshy substances covered in bodily fluids? Trust me! I have fleeeeeeeeesh."

by mob16151 on Feb 15, 2012 7:42 PM EST up reply actions  

I'd also recommend looking at both his

ANY/A, and his AY/A+ percentages.

B

flayed ones stealth mode

"Fleshling! Do not shoot! For I am one of you fleshy things. It is I. Your Uncle Stan. Can't you tell by the long strips of fleshy substances covered in bodily fluids? Trust me! I have fleeeeeeeeesh."

by mob16151 on Feb 15, 2012 7:50 PM EST up reply actions  

and his WKRP in cincinatti's too.

lol.

Sorry. I have no idea what those are anagrams for. lol

"He is a man of courage who does not run away, but remains at his post and fights against the enemy."

~Socrates

by ThaRealTruth on Feb 15, 2012 7:52 PM EST up reply actions  

Roman Gabriel’s numbers weren’t better. Your mistake is that you’re looking at the career stats. Bradshaw had a poor start to his career, but his prime was elite compared to the other QBs he was playing against. I say Gabriel was a game manager because, despite similar comp %s during their primes, Bradshaw averaged over a couple more yards per completion. That also somewhat explains the INTs which can also be explained by the poor start to Bradshaw’s career vs. Gabriel developing less from beginning to end.

Slightly above average players don’t have five years where they finish in the top five in the league in yards per pass attempt. Bradshaw was a terrible player early in his career and an elite player late in his career. Average those out by making the mistake of only looking at his career numbers and you’ve got a slightly above average player.

For a 5-10 year span (where Bradshaw won a 3 of his 4 SBs), Terry Bradshaw was an elite NFL QB, even from a statistical perspective.

"You mean @TWHITNER. It’s how he prefers to be referenced." - Jon Harrington

by kaisertown on Feb 15, 2012 9:04 PM EST up reply actions   3 recs

Thats fair

I do have a little bit of an irrational hate on for Terry Bradshaw.

flayed ones stealth mode

"Fleshling! Do not shoot! For I am one of you fleshy things. It is I. Your Uncle Stan. Can't you tell by the long strips of fleshy substances covered in bodily fluids? Trust me! I have fleeeeeeeeesh."

by mob16151 on Feb 16, 2012 12:33 AM EST up reply actions  

we all have that for some players

and people. it’s natural. Besides, bradshaw is a clown. hahaha. No worse than Simms, IMHO. ; )

But then, i pretty much hate all Giants, Redskins, Division rivals, and a good portion of the Steelers too. We all have biases. But some of them are TOTALLY justifiable. One thing I can say for certain about Fitz- he isn’t accused of being a rapist, drug dealer, or really anything worse than inaccurate. though that means he might be kinda questionable at his job, at least he doesn’t SUCK AT LIFE. : )

"He is a man of courage who does not run away, but remains at his post and fights against the enemy."

~Socrates

by ThaRealTruth on Feb 16, 2012 12:41 AM EST up reply actions  

Yea

Fitz does seem like he’d be a guy who would be a blast to just hang out with.

flayed ones stealth mode

"Fleshling! Do not shoot! For I am one of you fleshy things. It is I. Your Uncle Stan. Can't you tell by the long strips of fleshy substances covered in bodily fluids? Trust me! I have fleeeeeeeeesh."

by mob16151 on Feb 16, 2012 12:53 AM EST up reply actions  

But

They changed the rules guys! They made NFL commercial. D doesn’t win games anymore, Offe3nse baby!!

Don't Worry, Be Happy!

by buffalobacker on Feb 15, 2012 10:13 PM EST up reply actions  

Because you’re using his whole career and not just the time that he was good and the Steelers were winning SBs. Of course the guy has bad career numbers, he had a QB rating of 30 as a rookie.

The Steelers won a SB in spite of Bradshaw in 74/75, Bradshaw broke out the next year and was one of the best QBs in the league from there on. He had five top finishes in yards per pass attempt after that.

It’s completely pointless to compare career stats from a guy who played in the 70s to current QBs. Look at how he fared vs. his peers, in his prime and you’ll see how important he was to Pittsburgh. They weren’t just going to stumble on to some other QB to throw for 7.9 yards per attempt and win SBs with him. It’s not like Pittsburgh kept winning after he left.

"You mean @TWHITNER. It’s how he prefers to be referenced." - Jon Harrington

by kaisertown on Feb 15, 2012 7:21 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

Joe Namath

Mr. I’m In The Hall Of Fame Because I Predicted The Win is the least deserving. Career completion percentage of just over 50% a QB rating of a whopping 65.5, and 47 more picks than TDs. That right there is the least deserving QB in the HoF. It doesn’t help that he played for the Jets, which makes me like him that much less

by NDbuffalo on Feb 15, 2012 11:45 PM EST up reply actions  

that's why "Dirty" Sanchez is still around.

They think that you can still win a Super Bowl, as long as you have a good enough defense, to make up for a loser at QB. ; )

"He is a man of courage who does not run away, but remains at his post and fights against the enemy."

~Socrates

by ThaRealTruth on Feb 16, 2012 12:43 AM EST up reply actions  

It Would Be Nice If Some Of You Guy Had A Clue!

Completion percentage is absolutely NOT a valid way to compare QBs across eras because the rules radically changed to favor the passing game and protect the QB.

Prior to the first changes to the following, in the 1980s:

1.) The CB could put his hands on and push a WR ANYWHERE on the field before the ball was in the air.

2.) Defensive holding was only called if the DB actually grabbed the WR prior to the ball being thrown.

3.) Offensive linemen could not use their hands to pass protect.

4.) Defensive linemen could use the “head-slap” to throw an offensive lineman off balance when rushing the passer.

5.) A QB could be hit anywhere on his body by a defender.

6.) Horse-collar, close-line and the fore-arm shiver were all legal tackling techniques.

7.) Hitting the face-mask was legal as long as it wasn’t grabbed.

8.) All games were played on grass fields, which are slower than artificial turf, especially when “chopped up” by long metal cleats, in all kinds of weather conditions.

8.) And, submarining, cut-blocks, clipping and crack-back blocks were legal within 5 yards on either side of the line of scrimmage on running plays, the rules favored the running game over the passing game.

Moreover, if you had seen Gabriel, Jurgenson, Bradshaw or any of the other QBs of his era play (as I did), you would know the following:

1.) Sonny Jurgenson was one of the most talented QBs to ever play the game. He played on teams that had some great offensive talent at the skill positions. However, those teams also had questionable offensive lines and some of the worst defenses in NFL history. Jurgenson’s teams never had a chance to make it to the NFL Championship game in a conference where the Cleveland Browns and NY Giants had far superior defenses. Jurgenson, who was also famous for hard-drinking and making up his own plays, lost his only chance to go to a Super Bowl when Vince Lombardi died and George Allen replaced him with the more disciplined Billy Kilmer as the starting QB for Washington.

2.) Roman Gabriel was a terrific QB who had the misfortune of playing in the same conference as Bart Starr with the Packers dynasty and Johnny Unitas of the Colts (arguably the best QB of all-time). The Rams had one of the best front fours of all time and a very stout defense, but they were never able to win that big game that they needed to win against the Packers. There were two years when, had they done so, they would have been favored to win it all, but they fell just short. Gabriel wasn’t as mobile as Bradshaw, but had a better receiving corps than Bradshaw early in Bradshaw’s career.

3.) Len Dawson had already had some NFL experience, on the bench, before coming to the Chiefs, so he wasn’t a raw rookie when he became a starter. Also, he had the advantage of playing for a team that was coached by one of the most innovative (some would argue the best) offensive minds of his era: Hank Stram. In addition, he had one of the best and most unique WRs in the game in Otis Taylor, who, at 6’5", was bigger than any DB and yet had breakaway speed. The KC offense also featured far more throws to the TE and RBs than the Pittsburgh offense did, as Stram wanted to get the ball in the hands of Heisman Trophy winner, Mike Garrett, who was on the smallish side, in space.

Finally, the Pittsburgh team that Bradshaw joined had been a joke. Having failed to recognize the talent of Unitas and Dawson, the Pittsburgh offense, which featured RB John Henry Johnson, was horrible in the 1960s and early 1970s. The defense, prior to the arrival of “Mean Joe” Greene and Chuck Noll, was noted for it’s toughness and dirtiness in the 1960s, but it wasn’t very good in the 1960s and had lost much of its toughness in the early 1970s (opposing teams hated to play the Steelers in the 1950s and 1960s because, even though they knew that they would win the game, they knew that they would end up being literally beaten up—and sometimes even bitten—by them by game’s end). Even as a Bills’ fan of that era, I can say that the Steelers stunk when Bradshaw arrived.

It took time for Noll to put enough decent talent around Bradshaw to make it possible for him to florish as a QB and Bradshaw, not noted for being the “brightest bulb on the tree”, took a long time—and quite a beating—learning the position. So, Bradshaw’s early numbers are skewed, both by the team’s lack of talent and by his own stupidity and stubbornness. But, once he “got” the offense and Pittsburgh added a second fast WR for him to throw to in Lynn Swann, he was as good as there was at the QB position at the time. Yes, he had that great defense and great running game, but, unlike Gabriel, once he did, Bradshaw also had that knack for making the big play when it was needed as well.

You can’t glean when a QB makes a big throw to keep a drive going for a first down in the fourth quarter of a tight game from looking at a completion percentage stat forty years later. Or, whether his defense is so bad that he’s forced to take chances with his throws in the second quarter because he knows that his team isn’t good enough to hang with the opposition if he doesn’t take those chances (and maybe give them a chance if he is successful).

Unless you listen closely to some of the old-time NFL defensive players, you have no idea how much defense has been taken out of the game of pro football by all of the changes that have taken place over the last 50 years. If guys who grew up and played the game then grew up and played the game now, most of them could play the game and many of the stars would be stars today as well. But, it’s a significantly different game now than it was then and you simply cannot talk about players from those different eras without taking that into consideration. If you try to, you are just talking from ignorance.

Those who do not learn from the past are doomed to repeat it.

by LifetimeBillsFan on Feb 16, 2012 1:10 AM EST up reply actions   1 recs

i am only guessing

but, i am hearing “you guys are dumb” to not consider that those older QBs were very talented, even if the stats aren’t as comparable, because the game in general was harder?

if so: i agree. i think, that was some of my point. it is certainly a better, more elaborate version, where you have a wealth of knowledge and experience to back your view up. (it seems) I just have all the “NFL Films” vault to think of how many greats there have been, who would have been just as great now, if they had the chance. Or i completely misunderstand your post, and your point. That happens too.

"He is a man of courage who does not run away, but remains at his post and fights against the enemy."

~Socrates

by ThaRealTruth on Feb 16, 2012 1:30 AM EST up reply actions  

Don’t forget the QB carousel in Pit between Bradshaw, Terry Hanratty and Joe Gilliam. In 1974 Gilliam was the starter until Oakland shut them out 17-0 third week of the season. Hanratty also started a game that year.

Two QBs named Terry. Odd.

.

When the job is finished no one remembers how long it took, just how well it was performed.

by Buffalo for Eternity on Feb 16, 2012 1:40 AM EST up reply actions  

hold up
The defense, prior to the arrival of "Mean Joe" Greene and Chuck Noll, was noted for it’s toughness and dirtiness in the 1960s, but it wasn’t very good in the 1960s and had lost much of its toughness in the early 1970s

Is this the same defense that added Joe Greene in 1969,L.C. Greenwood in 1969,and Dwight White, and Ernie Holmes in 1971,and 72?

flayed ones stealth mode

"Fleshling! Do not shoot! For I am one of you fleshy things. It is I. Your Uncle Stan. Can't you tell by the long strips of fleshy substances covered in bodily fluids? Trust me! I have fleeeeeeeeesh."

by mob16151 on Feb 16, 2012 3:44 AM EST up reply actions  

Steel Curtain defense was pretty good in the ‘70s. I don’t know where he got his info.

.

When the job is finished no one remembers how long it took, just how well it was performed.

by Buffalo for Eternity on Feb 16, 2012 7:29 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

I’ll be interested to see a nice breakdown / comparison between Upshaw and Ingram, and maybe Mercilus as well (and perhaps Coples if one thinks he might drop to 10).

In terms of need and overall rank Upshaw and Ingram are both right in the Bills range.

by Pistol on Feb 15, 2012 2:32 PM EST reply actions  

a.) slow

b.) slower

c.) limited production in his college career.

Finished. Lol.

by AP22 on Feb 15, 2012 2:33 PM EST up reply actions  

We’ll get there. PLENTY of time.

Editor-in-Chief, BUFFALO RUMBLINGS®

by Brian Galliford on Feb 15, 2012 2:38 PM EST up reply actions  

But fortunately, not as much of an offseason as last year.

"Son. People can see you!"

by TheAfghanTwilight on Feb 15, 2012 4:55 PM EST up reply actions  

It’s still early, but so far I like both Ingram and Upshaw for the #10 pick, with Ingram appearing to be the better bet because he could definitely play a 4-3 DE and is the stronger pass rusher (though not as solid against the run as Upshaw).

by Macktruck on Feb 15, 2012 4:01 PM EST up reply actions  

Upshaw

As I mentioned in other posts Upshaw would be my choice at #10… He is a excellent “FOOTBALL” player from the national champions. I’ve watched him play numerous times and he is the real deal.. I don’t care if he is 6’ 1’ he brings it on every play. I’m sure Dareus would be thrilled with having a former teammate join him on the Bills.

.

Football is like life - it requires perseverance, self-denial, hard work, sacrifice, dedication and respect for authority.

Vince Lombardi

by Goose22 on Feb 15, 2012 2:32 PM EST reply actions  

I’m sure Dareus would be thrilled with having a former teammate

while dareus’ positive emotions make me feel all warm and fuzzy inside, i would really (reaaallllyy) hope they are totally irrelevant in who buddy selects with the 10th overall draft choice.

Its fun to think quarterback, but i think the odds of nix taking one in the first are close to 0%.

by boomsauce on Feb 15, 2012 2:35 PM EST up reply actions   1 recs

while dareus’ positive emotions make me feel all warm and fuzzy inside, i would really (reaaallllyy) hope they are totally irrelevant in who buddy selects with the 10th overall draft choice.

Trust me. It is irrelevant to him. Buddy and the scouting department will pick the best player and fit for the team. That other stuff is just a bonus if it happens to fall that way in the process.

by AP22 on Feb 15, 2012 2:38 PM EST up reply actions  

totally irrelevant in who buddy selects

Agreed….

All I can add is that they will always have a connection as teammates on a great college team and I would bet they would enjoy the same connection as Pro’s on the the Bills…

ROLL BILLS……………

.

Football is like life - it requires perseverance, self-denial, hard work, sacrifice, dedication and respect for authority.

Vince Lombardi

by Goose22 on Feb 15, 2012 2:42 PM EST up reply actions  

If he could be molded to play SLB and pass rusher, he would be a “snug fit”, SLB on run downs and pass rush in nickel and dime, making him the everydown player we all should covet, realizing that may be sacrifycing the skill set a bit, but may be worth looking into.

by garcia76 on Feb 15, 2012 2:35 PM EST reply actions  

I don’t understand why we would want to draft a pass rusher good enough to rush on obvious pass downs, but then not play him at DE on first down. Upshaw would be a DE only for this team when they used four down lineman looks.

"You mean @TWHITNER. It’s how he prefers to be referenced." - Jon Harrington

by kaisertown on Feb 15, 2012 4:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Which will be most of the time. Nickel and the base D will be 4 down lineman. Thats a lot of time for Upshaw to be on the field.

by NDbuffalo on Feb 15, 2012 6:03 PM EST up reply actions  

I was under the impression that garcia76 was suggesting that Upshaw play LB when Buffalo was in a 4-3 and shift down to DE in the nickel. I think that’s crazy because if a guy is good enough to rush the passer from the nickel, why wouldn’t you also want him rushing the passer every down when Buffalo is in the 4-3? If he’s a DE in pass situations, why would he ever, under any circumstance, be regularly dropped into coverage on first down? That’s my point. I’m fine with Upshaw, but he’s a player you line up at a pass rushing position, not a LB position, every single down. It’d be like lining him up at ILB in a 3-4 on first down and then move him to OLB for passing downs. There is a reason that no NFL teams do that with players.

"You mean @TWHITNER. It’s how he prefers to be referenced." - Jon Harrington

by kaisertown on Feb 15, 2012 6:17 PM EST up reply actions  

OK. Sorry for the misunderstanding. I agree with you. I see him used at DE for the 43 and nickel looks, and we’d see him at OLB when they’d go 34 looks. And thats if they feel he can handle the load at 43 DE.

by NDbuffalo on Feb 15, 2012 6:42 PM EST up reply actions  

Like it's been said

a hundred times this offseason. We are going to be a “4-3” but like Chix have said multiple times themselves its about 50/50 43 to 34. Trying to keep offenses on their toes is the key and I think having a talent like Upshaw only helps us do that. Like Brian says in the article Upshaw can play a little with his hand in the dirt I think he would work just fine in our “4-3”.

by brucesmithistheman on Feb 15, 2012 2:49 PM EST reply actions  

BPA is how OBD will go
  1. is a really tough spot obviously. Between DE/OLB/CB/ their board will dictate who they take at that spot. Can’t see it being a WR, but would not surprise me to see them pick a CB at that slot. Free agency will spell out the move, so these kinds of posts will have a lot more meaning in late March. Heck I could even see us drafting a tackle at #10 if the top prospect at that position seems like value at that slot and the top defensive talent is off the board by then.

by AlwaysaBillinPhilly on Feb 15, 2012 3:15 PM EST reply actions  

WTF!!

I hate that insider report from ESPN. How do u charge people to read articles…crazy!!!

Prefer Hightowet instead.

by doctork44 on Feb 15, 2012 3:26 PM EST via mobile reply actions  

Yeah, I wish all newspapers and magazines were free too!

by Pistol on Feb 15, 2012 3:48 PM EST up reply actions  

magazines are free if you look hard enough.

"Son. People can see you!"

by TheAfghanTwilight on Feb 15, 2012 4:53 PM EST up reply actions  

Before the switch from 3-4 to 4-3

I was on board with drafting Upshaw. However, since we are “transitioning” back to the 4-3 (which I approve of) I am not sold on the idea. He may be sliiightly better than the other pass rushers but I don’t see much difference. I would prefer a trade down to get Hightower or Mercilus, or if Coples is still there I would take him. I have a feeling it’s not going to be Upshaw. Still, there’s the chance we do take Hightower or Kirkpatrick to reunite with Dareus.

"What it takes to win is simple, it's not easy."

-Marv Levy

by ALLaBorde on Feb 15, 2012 3:31 PM EST reply actions  

Mercilus

Doesn’t Mercilus strike fear in your heart. He is by reports a one year wonder (Maybin)

by Winnie33 on Feb 15, 2012 3:52 PM EST reply actions  

Pierre Paul

had the same thing said about him. I’d like to think Mercilus is way more NFL ready then Maybin. Even I knew Maybin was a horrendous choice when we took him. Me and my brother were screaming for Orakpo!

"What it takes to win is simple, it's not easy."

-Marv Levy

by ALLaBorde on Feb 16, 2012 2:11 PM EST up reply actions  

DJ

was the only one who was happy with Maybin. I think everyone shouted NOOOOOOOO. We grabbed the wrong prospect. At least it was years before Mike Williams was exposed as the soft inside of a cream puff….

I'd rather go out in a blaze of glory, then slowly fade away in the antiquities of time.

by suteck on Feb 16, 2012 3:28 PM EST up reply actions  

I wanted Maybin that year. But to be fair I was hoping Raji would fall to us so we could take him instead.

"Everyone who has conducted an expedition will know how ready the world is to do the great injustice of heaping the whole praise or blame for its success or failure on the shoulders of the leader alone."
-Polar Explorer Fridtjof Nansen

by NordicBillsfan on Feb 16, 2012 4:30 PM EST up reply actions  

This guy being a "foregone conclusion"

is a joke to me. I think he would be a better interior LB in a 34, then an edge rushing OLB. He isn’t a DE to me, either. I really don’t see how he is a fit, and he certainly isn’t as scheme diverse in my eyes.

"He is a man of courage who does not run away, but remains at his post and fights against the enemy."

~Socrates

by ThaRealTruth on Feb 15, 2012 4:16 PM EST reply actions  

he is not over 6'2" and too heavy.

don’t see how he can ever be great. I think he can be a decent DE, but we need to get a great player at #10.

With the 10th Pick in the 2012 NFL Draft the Buffalo Bills select Dont'a Hightower LB Alabama.

by tomcs on Feb 15, 2012 4:45 PM EST reply actions  

You mean, he’s a bit like Elvis Dumervil?

"Son. People can see you!"

by TheAfghanTwilight on Feb 15, 2012 4:53 PM EST up reply actions  

Who are you referring to?

by AP22 on Feb 15, 2012 7:37 PM EST up reply actions  

Upshaw, I would assume, as this is a post about him mostly

and that was who tomcs was referring, from what i gathered. TAT is making a comparison of Upshaw to Dumervil based off tomcs’s description.

"He is a man of courage who does not run away, but remains at his post and fights against the enemy."

~Socrates

by ThaRealTruth on Feb 15, 2012 7:44 PM EST up reply actions  

ha

elvis has the right weight, but wiki says he is 5’11" wow. but that is so rare to make that comparison I think is a stretch.

With the 10th Pick in the 2012 NFL Draft the Buffalo Bills select Dont'a Hightower LB Alabama.

by tomcs on Feb 15, 2012 8:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Plus if he is comparing Upshaw to Dumervil, it isn’t even a comparison. Dumervil is waaaaay faster and more explosive out of his stance. Big difference between the two.

by AP22 on Feb 15, 2012 9:20 PM EST up reply actions  

Doesn't seem all that logical to me

Sure he’s used to winning and is a former teammate of dareus, but that doesn’t mean he’s the BPA or the best fit. He doesn’t seem nearly as fast as Von miller or a wide array of moves to help him transition to the pros. It really makes me question whether he is a great football player or just a solid player playing on a great defense. He never seemed like much of a difference maker or completely taking over a particular play. He just seemed like a solid player with a high motor. Problem is if he doesn’t have te measureables or fit the new scheme how can you justify taking him so high?

"I promise you, ... When I come back, I'm going to be like a mad dog in a meat house." -Takeo Spikes

by panekattack on Feb 15, 2012 4:48 PM EST reply actions  

This was my reasoning for saying OLB is a priority. I don’t like the thought of the pick, but I can see Buffalo going with this sort of rationale.

"Son. People can see you!"

by TheAfghanTwilight on Feb 15, 2012 4:52 PM EST reply actions  

i know we need a rusher

But what I think the Bills defense really need is an attitude….so get your pass rusher @ 10 then move your second round pick to get back into the 1st and get that linebacker from ASU….Now the dee can put some fear into these teams in the afc east…we got punked too many times…this is a mans league….why do you thnk the Giants won their last two trophies!! IMO

by rexachss on Feb 15, 2012 5:13 PM EST via mobile reply actions  

That would be amazing! I went to ASU so I’d love to see a Sun Devil on my Buffalo Bills! Burfict does seem to make some bone headed decisions sometimes, but he is an absolute beast.

by TCMiller30 on Feb 15, 2012 7:22 PM EST up reply actions  

Wasn’t excited about Upshaw before the switch.
Even less excited about him now.

He’s a solid 3-4 OLB but I wouldn’t really call him that great of a pass-rusher. Some criticism I’ve seen of him is that he has tight hips and can’t drop back and cover well, so that makes him even less of a fit as a 4-3 OLB.

If I’m taking a short-armed DE/OLB at 10 it’s going to be Melvin Ingram.

"Everyone who has conducted an expedition will know how ready the world is to do the great injustice of heaping the whole praise or blame for its success or failure on the shoulders of the leader alone."
-Polar Explorer Fridtjof Nansen

by NordicBillsfan on Feb 15, 2012 5:19 PM EST reply actions  

One of the writers over at Mocking on the Draft did a nice write up a little while ago on why they think he’s actually a more ideal fit for a 4-3 end. I haven’t gotten too deep into the draft yet to decide if I agree (not that it matters) but it is a pretty good read.

http://www.mockingthedraft.com/2011/12/2/2605862/film-breakdown-of-courtney-upshaw

Thank you thank you thank you thank you sireric for bringing the furious punching cat back into my life. - poz

by bluecollarbuffalo on Feb 16, 2012 7:52 AM EST up reply actions  

QB

KELLEN MOORE OR CASE KEENUM WITH SECOND PICK IN THE FOUTH ROUND.

by lalime40 on Feb 15, 2012 7:43 PM EST reply actions  

Kellen Moore

Wouldn’t hurt my feelings, but kinda smallish considering our O/L :)

Don't Worry, Be Happy!

by buffalobacker on Feb 15, 2012 10:16 PM EST up reply actions  

Is anyone else on here wondering what the heck the coaching staff and the front office has been doing for the last several weeks? I would love to be a fly on a wall. It seems like nothing is happening but that probably isn’t the case. I would like to hear from Buddy as to what is happening etc.

by AP22 on Feb 15, 2012 9:37 PM EST reply actions  

Go with the Tide

I like the idea of taking a tide player at 10 but definately not upshaw. looking at his youtubes videos shows that he cannot get to the qb let alone control the line of scrimmage. Now Danta Hightower is a football player who the bills need on our team. I know he is an inside linebacker but he is way better than upshaw.

by koozyburger on Feb 16, 2012 1:13 AM EST reply actions  

right on. Roll tide. I like hightower a bunch too. i think he could be an OLB. he has the talent.

"He is a man of courage who does not run away, but remains at his post and fights against the enemy."

~Socrates

by ThaRealTruth on Feb 16, 2012 1:26 AM EST up reply actions  

Wat round is Tannehill going in, and can.tge bills get him

"They’re a very special group of men. Cherish them, you will not see their like again."

by chaucer on Feb 16, 2012 1:44 AM EST via mobile reply actions  

Good questions. No one knows. Some say 1st, others say 2nd. So I guess the Bills could get him. One of life’s mysteries.

.

When the job is finished no one remembers how long it took, just how well it was performed.

by Buffalo for Eternity on Feb 16, 2012 1:53 AM EST up reply actions  

In the “First Draft” podcast, McShay (or however you spell his name) had Upshaw going to the Bills as well.

Thank you thank you thank you thank you sireric for bringing the furious punching cat back into my life. - poz

by bluecollarbuffalo on Feb 16, 2012 7:43 AM EST reply actions  

Just as I have said.....

Upshaw plays SOLB on run downs and LDE on pass downs.

It is a win-win as well….I say Kelsay has more impact plays playing less and he stays healthier throughout the season.

If we did get a FA RDE that could pass rush, our front seven should be top-notch. Sheppard has to make that huge jump this year and everybody has to stay healthy.
Imagine if Merriman came back at 85% of his former self as a bonus. We could move him around to attack weak areas of the offense and catch the QB sleeping at times and have depth……ooooooooooohhhhh……it would exciting as all hell.

PodunkO - The great post ender!

by podunkowego on Feb 16, 2012 11:39 AM EST reply actions  

There is nothing that makes more sense for Buffalo than to take

Courtney Upshaw or Melvin Ingram with their 1st pick because it essentially fills 2 positions of need: SLB and DE

"I don't agree with a damn thing you say, but I would die for your right to say it."

"If I had to do it all over again, I'd do it all over again."

by ForeignArrow on Feb 16, 2012 3:29 PM EST reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

SB Nation's home for all things Buffalo Bills.
Community Guidelines :: Essential BR

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recommended FanPosts

Small
The Return of the Running Back(s): Revisiting the Road to the Super Bowl
Bills_small
An Exploration of Ryan Fitzpatrick's TDs and INTs
Small
Beyond the Perfect Offseason: Where Do We Go From Here?
Dsc00843_small
NFL Divisional Record And Playoff Berth Correlation, 2002-2011

Recent FanPosts

Small
Who Will be the Number 2?
Spikes_small
Remaining Free Agents
04_buffalo_bills_football_coloring_at_coloring-pages-book-for-kids-boys_small
Mock 2012 Season
Small
Difference Between A "Franchise" QB and an "Elite" One
303857_872291743296_10504698_40499694_6362492_n_small
Be A Little Nicer Please, Bills Fans  :)
Cyclops1-12nd7cv_small
Current QB Wins
Small
The Count-Down to the Right Numbers
Bruuuuce_small
Ranking All 32 NFL Starting QB's : Who is ELITE?
Snapshot_20120113_small
Next Stop: 3rd Generation of Winners

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

Screen_shot_2012-03-07_at_6 Brian Galliford

100_2488_small MattRichWarren

Authors

Range_march_2011_small Ron From NM

Slide1_small Der Jaeger

Moderators

Sucks_small Kurupt

Mrsinister03_small sireric

Cordy_small poz