Bills QB Ryan Fitzpatrick Played Hurt, Per David Nelson
Buffalo Bills wide receiver David Nelson confirmed to NBC Sports on Friday what Bills fans had long assumed: quarterback Ryan Fitzpatrick played more than half of the 2011 season injured. Nelson told Doug Flutie that Fitzpatrick cracked ribs during the team's Week 8 win over the Washington Redskins.
"A lot of people don't know, but Fitz during the Washington game actually cracked a couple of ribs. So after that, he was playing hurt," Nelson confirmed to Flutie.
As we noted last month, Fitzpatrick's statistical output took a nosedive after Redskins linebacker London Fletcher hit the quarterback hard in the first half of the Bills' 23-0 win. Below, you can see how Fitzpatrick's pre-Fletcher hit numbers stand up next to the post-hit output. The results aren't surprising now that we know that Fitzpatrick had cracked ribs.
Pre-Injury: 67% completions, 7.6 yards per attempt, 13 TD, 7 INT
Post-Injury: 59% completions, 6.2 yards per attempt, 11 TD, 16 INT
Perhaps Fitzpatrick was going to take a statistical nosedive anyway, and the injury catalyzed that process; perhaps we can justifiably excuse some of Fitzpatrick's poor second-half play, knowing what we know now. Interpret this how you will; the most interesting thing to me is that both Buddy Nix and Chan Gailey glossed this detail over to reporters when they were perfectly willing to find scapegoats (see: Edwards, George) anywhere else.
118 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Considering how poor the defense was
I don’t think you can really call Edwards a scapegoat. He was on the wrong side of the median whether Fitzpatrick fell off or not.
Winging It In Motown, Over the Monster, Liberty Ballers, and Buffalo Rumblings!
by Scott Kenny on Feb 4, 2012 11:33 AM EST reply actions 4 recs
So if a defensive coordinator does a bad job. Its not his fault.
"This is a chance to shine some light on the city, They say it’s too cold. I’m going to bring some warmth to it." Marcell Dareus
by matthew62 on Feb 4, 2012 11:40 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
I think he's saying...
Edwards wasn’t a scapegoat…he was just a bad DC and was out regardless of how Fitz played or the team fared.
Hopefully Fitzy can stay healthy in 2012. I think this team with Bad Fitz vs Good Fitz is worlds different. If Bad Fitz was moreso because of injury then I’m excited for next season!
by buffaloparks on Feb 4, 2012 6:32 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Agree
As according the Dareus Chan is a very hands off HC. He gave Edwards a chance to succeed or fail at his job. He failed so he was let go.
Harooo
by Robot Nixon on Feb 4, 2012 11:42 AM EST up reply actions 4 recs
rec'd
Yes, Edwards swam or sank on his own accord. He sank and was fired. He was a bad DC based on his inability to put a defense out there who couldn’t stop offenses from scoring even 40% of the time. That is abysmal.
I thought Fitz might have been hurt. Some of those passes, he contorted his body in such an odd angle that I wondered why he’d make that motion. Now, I get it, his body is adjusting for the pain of doing something.
I'd rather go out in a blaze of glory, then slowly fade away in the antiquities of time.
Agreed. He didn't have all the tools needed to be great, but he could have done better than abysmal.
"I got no problem with 7-9 coming off of 4-12 as long as I don't buy a couch there, you got to keep moving" - Mike Schoop
I remember that hit...
Werewolves of London destroyed him…
But we ended up giving Shany his first shutout EVER!!!!
GO BILLS
I HAVE THE HEART OF THE BUUFALO the strength of the OF THE MOUNTAIN , THE FURY OF THE THUNDER AND MY WILL IS UNBREAKABLE , I will not surrender to KNOW ONE - abayarde
Ok, but...
Yes, so he was probably hurt. Even if he was in pain the rest of the season, you’d think A) he’s smart enough to know that an injury would affect his throwing motion/velocity, B) he’d need to make adjustments and not try to take huge risks that he would take if he was 100% healthy, and C) he’d tell the staff so they could game plan accordingly.
Although, D) or, 1A) being the awful defense pretty much put the game on his arm as we seemed to be quickly down 14-0 in a few games after he got hurt.
I also think playing him when the injury was affecting his performance so dramatically shows that the team really has no confidence in Thigpen.
"I could have conquered Europe, all of it, but I had women in my life." - King Henry II of England
by Calvert on Feb 4, 2012 9:07 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
I'' be the rare commenter
who admits they were wrong after the fact. I doubted he had an injury, and if this news is true, he indeed did. I find it odd that after the season was over, the team didn’t come out and say this. You have a large number of fans saying: “He sucked after he signed his contract…they wasted their money and set the team back” and “See, I told you he’s not a franchise guy”. It strikes me as odd they wouldn’t have come out and mentioned this. Also, when your QB is bailing out on passes and has cracked ribs RUN THE BALL MORE WITH YOUR FIRST ROUND DRAFT PICK!!!!!
Thank you thank you thank you thank you sireric for bringing the furious punching cat back into my life. - poz
by bluecollarbuffalo on Feb 4, 2012 11:59 AM EST reply actions
Gotta respect Fitzpatrick for not only playing through the injury, but also not whining about it or making excuses for poor performances because of it. (Even though it was a good excuse.)
If what Nelson says is true, I might have to take back some claims I made when I posited that the impact of injuries on the Bills were overblown by the fanbase. http://www.buffalorumblings.com/2012/1/19/2720214/we-stunk-because-of-injuries-fact-or-fiction
Because it does no good for the Bills to say that. Then writers and fans call it making excuses.
It was what it was and the team has to move on from it.
"I got no problem with 7-9 coming off of 4-12 as long as I don't buy a couch there, you got to keep moving" - Mike Schoop
Amen brother!
All of does who disrespect us and come to our Holly ground will be knock to king dome come and turn to dust in the wind This is our House Holly to the Buffalo Nation. ~abayarde
If you don’t learn something here, you just aren’t paying attention. ~jonramz
Heck yes
On that last statement!
by buffaloparks on Feb 4, 2012 6:35 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Romo is tough, Fitz is tougher!
by ManitobaBillsFan on Feb 4, 2012 12:41 PM EST via mobile reply actions 1 recs
Especially since Romo made damn sure everyone knew about his poor cracked ribs :( just in case he played badly :(
I hate that little whiner.
Ron Paul 2012
by BuffaloBlueBlood on Feb 4, 2012 12:51 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Although I don’t discount that Nelson may in fact be telling the truth. I do not understand the motivation for Gailey to keep this under wraps the entire season and after. He is always struck me as very candid in his approach to the media. Why not shed some light on his QB’s status when the fan base and media are at his throat performance wise post contract and at the height of the losing streak. I really can make no sense out of this. He was willing to talk about many aspects of this team and injuries that even he himself would describe as excuses but not a word on Fitz’s ribs. I’m at a loss for logical motive or explanation
by eriesimmer on Feb 4, 2012 12:43 PM EST via mobile reply actions
It makes perfect sense to me
Last season we were the LEAST blitzed team in the NFL, as a result of Fitz’ ability to get the ball out quick. Had opposing defenses known he had cracked ribs, I assume they would have dialed up the pressure, not to get sacks but to HIT him as he was getting the ball out. And… since Fitz ain’t gonna get fawned over by the refs like Brady… they probably would have got away with it.
also..
This is right around when he signed his contract. Imagine what it would have looked like had he then missed the next game. Instead of us fans saying, “Oh! Our players always SUCK after getting paid” we wouda said, “Oh! What a pansy, as soon as he gets paid he gets worried about injuries and benches himself, Draft a franchise QB who’s willing to play thru pain!!” No one ever said us BILLS fans were fair…
by Nepenthe88 on Feb 4, 2012 1:37 PM EST up reply actions 3 recs
^^ This. Rec’d.
"My new cat just farted on my lap. Smells like Bills football." BG.
by SERGEANT MAJOR THOR on Feb 4, 2012 9:01 PM EST up reply actions
it does not explain our coach not mentioning it after the season in any way shape or form
by eriesimmer on Feb 4, 2012 11:24 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Well
why would it be an issue for the Bills after the season, it’s not like the local sports media is known for asking tough questions, or investigating pretty much anything.
flayed ones stealth mode
"Fleshling! Do not shoot! For I am one of you fleshy things. It is I. Your Uncle Stan. Can't you tell by the long strips of fleshy substances covered in bodily fluids? Trust me! I have fleeeeeeeeesh."
Way to expose the team to fines, Nelson. If Fitz was hurt and the team knew it but didn’t have him on the injury report the team can be fined. If Fitz was hurt and the team didnt know, well, in a way that’s even worse.
I wasn't sure I was going to like the white helmets but seeing them in the practice footage, I've got to say that I love the look.
by Ron From NM on Feb 4, 2012 12:43 PM EST via mobile reply actions 1 recs
rec'd....I was waiting to see if someone said this
"Ability may get you to the top, but it takes character to keep you there." - John Wooden
"Do not repeat the tactics which have gained you one victory, but let your methods be regulated by the infinite variety of circumstances." - Sun Tzu
Players play hurt every week. They only have to list the injuries if they are restricted in practice.
They listed him on the injury report for 1 week. After that they didn’t need to restrict a player who is protected from contact during practice.
"I got no problem with 7-9 coming off of 4-12 as long as I don't buy a couch there, you got to keep moving" - Mike Schoop
by lonestar_ak on Feb 4, 2012 5:57 PM EST up reply actions 2 recs
Ron From NM
You may or may not be right about them not reporting it. If I remember correctly, Fitz was listed on the injured report at least for the week after the Redskins game. Now did they say that he had cracked ribs? Not that I remember. My question is do they have to specifically put what the injury is or can they just say something like, “It is a chest injury and he was limited today.”? If they can do the latter, I don’t think that you can say that they broke the rules the week after the game.
I thought all they have to do now is say if players practiced fully or were limited.
by MattRichWarren on Feb 4, 2012 9:47 PM EST up reply actions
Correct. Then they must list probability of said player playing on game day.
Fitz didn’t have to be limited after the general soreness was gone since he wouldn’t take any contact during practice.
Compare this to Stevie who had to have his reps reduced due to his sore groin.
"I got no problem with 7-9 coming off of 4-12 as long as I don't buy a couch there, you got to keep moving" - Mike Schoop
the most interesting thing to me is that both Buddy Nix and Chan Gailey glossed this detail over to reporters when they were perfectly willing to find scapegoats (see: Edwards, George) anywhere else.
What? They can’t admit this detail in retrospect without opening the team up to a league fine.
Was George Edwards really a complete scapegoat? I don’t feel like they said an ill word about George. Sure they fired him, but I saw no effort on their part to say the team’s struggles were really entirely at Edwards feet and would be solved with a change. They admitted they had personnel short-comings at multiple positions many times.
In many ways this makes a lot of sense as far as Chan and Nix’s confidence in Ryan. They felt like they knew Fitz could play better when healthier. If anything it rationalizes there seemingly unshaken confidence in Ryan.
I have low expectations. But high hopes.
What? They can’t admit this detail in retrospect without opening the team up to a league fine.
True. I had not considered that.
Editor-in-Chief, BUFFALO RUMBLINGS®
Follow @BrianGalliford
by Brian Galliford on Feb 4, 2012 1:55 PM EST up reply actions
It certainly begs the question why be so secretive about it in the first place.
I have low expectations. But high hopes.
Is it really being secretive
if noone is asking?
flayed ones stealth mode
"Fleshling! Do not shoot! For I am one of you fleshy things. It is I. Your Uncle Stan. Can't you tell by the long strips of fleshy substances covered in bodily fluids? Trust me! I have fleeeeeeeeesh."
You're 100% spot on here
Was George Edwards really a complete scapegoat? I don’t feel like they said an ill word about George. Sure they fired him, but I saw no effort on their part to say the team’s struggles were really entirely at Edwards feet and would be solved with a change. They admitted they had personnel short-comings at multiple positions many times.
I get so tired of seeing Edwards called a scapegoat. He could and should have done more with what he had.
Hearing veteran defensive players talking about missing fits in the second year is inexcusable to me. That falls on coaching right there.
"I got no problem with 7-9 coming off of 4-12 as long as I don't buy a couch there, you got to keep moving" - Mike Schoop
Hearing veteran defensive players talking about missing fits in the second year is inexcusable to me. That falls on coaching right there.
I strongly disagree. That is on the player that missed the fit.
Coaches teach their schemes
It is up to them to get the players to understand the concepts. If the players don’t get the system then it needs to be modified or different players, who do get it, installed.
I could understand if this was happening in the first year, but second year in the system with veteran players is on the coaching to me.
Don’t get me wrong, we need better players too, but there was a large failure from the coaches.
"I got no problem with 7-9 coming off of 4-12 as long as I don't buy a couch there, you got to keep moving" - Mike Schoop
Not understanding the system might have something to do with the “hybrid” thing. Our players had to learn two different systems 3-4 & 4-3 with no off-season for the rookies. We should be better now with a final decision of base 4-3.
agree w JJ
as far as THIS year goes, preparation for the younger players, could have brought with it some difficulty. BUT, the guys that it would hinder, were in there early, and often, and fared pretty well. (Dareus, Williams, Shepp, Searcy- these were guys who played well, or better than expected, or at least as average as the rest of the squad, by most people’s standards.)
His first year, might have been the ‘figure it out some’ year… but then, he ADDED talent, in a number of spots, and STILL couldn’t figure it out. Thus, fired. As against the idea of Wanny, and the 43 as I am (on this i have been abundantly clear) I don’t think he can really do much worse of a job, so hopefully we can stay a little closer, and get some offensive weapons capable of keeping us in shoot outs. Still wanna see some more running. If it has to be outta the spread, fine. But more than 15 touches for a pro bowl level RB, and his respective first round “waterbug”, sure would be nice.
ABAYARDE IS NOSTRADAMUS JUST WATCH WE WILL NOT YIEALD TO NOBODY YOUR SOUL WE WILL TAKE
Let it also be known
That Bilichick went to the 4-3 this year because he didn’t think he’d have enough time to install a successful 3-4 and do all that they needed to do. So, he went to 4-3 due to nickel and other formations. Again, smart coach, recognized that he needed to change. Edwards never adjusted. Lets face it, the ONLY game he actually did a good job with was the Denver game. That was great game planning. he was also very good against the Chiefs and Skins, but, that Denver game caught everyone off-guard.
I'd rather go out in a blaze of glory, then slowly fade away in the antiquities of time.
you have "made it known" on a number of threads
But I don’t really see what the point is. Belichick (i finally got it right!!! I watched “A Football Life” last night.) is indeed a great coach. Certainly few will deny, even those of us who think he has also been a cheater, and in general, easy to loath. But, the fact is that they started a long snapper at linebacker, and a WR at corner, and ultimately, he got WAY more out of his players than many other coaches might. I don’t know that he wouldn’t be running his beloved 34, if he had the talent to, or if he wasn’t trying to create a patchwork defense that just held them in games for Brady to win for him. (2 waiver corners who played pretty well, but definitely got exposed) and if not for their HUGE DTs/DE…. they would have not been half the defense (literally and figuratively both) that they were this year.
But the Patriots aside, we still should have seen some kind of improvement from our defense, as we ADDED talent, and we got bigger, and we were the second year in the scheme, and we still just sucked. That is how it is. So, he wasn’t doing the job with his scheme, his instruction, or both, at very least. That much seems obvious to me; As obvious as it seems to make changes to your scheme, should your roster dictate it. (That said, I am still skeptical about moving back to a 4 man front, given our increased size, but general lack of pass rushers. Big slow guys, who don’t bring pressure, put an awful lot on the defensive backs, which is unnecessary. But this is less an issue of scheme, or coaching, but plain and simple lack of talent.)
ABAYARDE IS NOSTRADAMUS JUST WATCH WE WILL NOT YIEALD TO NOBODY YOUR SOUL WE WILL TAKE
this is good news in a way. Up until that Redskins game he had played pretty great. and then he had some good games some terrible games and mostly okay games. This makes a lot of sense considering his accuracy significantly got worse after the Redskins game, especially deep passes.
This makes be think that he can be the guy for the next couple years and lead us to the Playoffs and then who knows. Before this my confidence in him was becoming less. We don’t need a QB this year we can draft one next year. Get some weapons around him and get some pass rushers. He is very accurate as the new QB coach said.
With the 10th Pick in the 2012 NFL Draft the Buffalo Bills select Dont'a Hightower LB Alabama.
I would like to see.....
Fitzy’s numbers lbroken down by weeks 4 through 8, and weeks 9 – through 16.
I am positive they would be way closer to each other.
The fact is he had three amazing weeks and then the fizzle came.
Of course, the injury would have made his chances of turning his game around an impossibility.
PodunkO - The great post ender!
Weeks % Com. TDS Ints YPC
1,2,3 64.9% 9 3 7.58
4,5,6,7 70.3% 5 4 7.61
8,9,10 54.5% 2 7 5.41
11,12,13,14,15,16,17 59.8% 8 9 6.47
So his TD-Int was worse, but thats probably noisier. His completion percentage and YPC were solid in weeks 4-7 and improved in weeks 11-17… so its not that clear to me that his good games are restricted to the first three weeks.
I have low expectations. But high hopes.
by greysquirrel on Feb 4, 2012 2:03 PM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Not sure how to post a table, but he had higher completion rate and more YPC in weeks 4-7 than 1,2,3. Late in the season he bounced back some. from the terrible stretch folloing the redskins game. But he never got back to the first half of the season numbers. Unfortunately. But lower YPC is pretty much to be expected if his deep ball is off. As is the offenses growing predictability….
I have low expectations. But high hopes.
Interesting.....
Looking at the numbers…..closely, you can look at it a lot and keep looking…..I did not remember that just the TD – int rate really changed after week three. I would have guessed that the yds./attempt went down significantly as well. So thanks for showing that to me.
I don’t know what you mean by noisier, but TD INT ratio is huge and I think he was seeing the field better in weeks one through three and just playing better. Maybe it’s just the breaks but he definitely did not look the same to me from week four on. As I have said, much worse pocket presence, locking onto receivers, throwing passes to defenders, throwing bad passes etc. INt %.
His stats in weeks 11-17 did improve over his 8-10 stats, but they are still midland at best.
Like it or not, but unless we get a D like the 85 bears, we are going to have to have fitzy’s week 1 -3 numbers way more than the three weeks last year. The cracked ribs really makes me think that maybe he would have thrown himself out of the poor TD
So, I am glad you responded and I feel better about Fitz heading into 2012, thanks.
Now, only if chixy will get us the 2 ends, 1 SOLB, 2 wrs. 1 Lt. Tk. And 1 TE to compete for a title for 2012.
PodunkO - The great post ender!
I have no idea.....
Why the comment above is crossed out and I’m not retyping….sorry
PodunkO - The great post ender!
haha no worries. i mean it can be noisier because there is more volatility in TDs and ints game to game, so when looking at three game stretches im less comfortable interpreting a trend. whereas there are many attempt and completions so something like completion percentage varies less gamke to game than td-int ratio. Picks can be flukey (we know that) as can TDs. So a few odd events in 3 games can impact that ratio good and bad. his accuracy and YPC was impressive during that stretch, so its not so clear he had become “innacurate” fitz but week 4.
I have low expectations. But high hopes.
Again, why lie?
Fitz said he wasn’t injured. I don’t get it and this team, what is the big secret. If you broke some ribs, you broke some ribs. If you don’t want to resign Stevie, you don’t want to resign Stevie
Gailey....
I think the injury lies comes from Gailey. The bills really haven’t shot straight about injuries since he got here.
I still don’t know which shoulder bell hurt. He hurt it three times I believe, but I don’t know if it was the same shoulder or not.
What was wrong with Byrd and when did it first occur and how many surgeries did he have?
This was the primary reason people thought Byrd was a soft or poor tackler. He was hurt all along and couldn’t tackle but most fans were unaware because both Jauron and Gailey were not talking.
I think he tries to remain secretive because he believes it gives opponents an advantage.
PodunkO - The great post ender!
Again, why lie?
This is a bit of an overreaction.
- First, as another poster mentioned, if a player is able to practice fully prior to the game then teams do not have to list them on the injury report.
- Second, individual players make the decision as to how detailed the injury information is that gets released to the general public. It is part of the rules that prevents your medical information from being released unless you authorize it (or court order, work stipulation etc) for the team to announce. That is why a players’ injury may only contain the nebulous “upper body injury” or “lower body injury” such as we saw with Aaron Williams.
.
When the job is finished no one remembers how long it took, just how well it was performed.
by Buffalo for Eternity on Feb 4, 2012 6:40 PM EST up reply actions
True. HIPAA laws state that you can’t talk about someone else’s health information without their consent. Legally, you can’t even tell a friend if someone you know is pregnant unless the woman gives her consent.
Thanks for not saying HIPPA :) Pet Peeve!
by buffaloparks on Feb 5, 2012 12:36 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
get me a superbowl
Enough with the excuses
…we have been supporting this franchise for decades….go get that damn trophy ….its been almost a lifetime! !!!!
by rexachss on Feb 4, 2012 11:48 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Can't really call George Edwards a scapegoat
Fitz being injured doesn’t change the fact that the defense got rolled over in every game the 2nd half of the year (aside from Denver). In order for him to be a scapegoat he wold have to be innocent and I don’t think we can really say he was with the terrible defensive performance. Plus if Fitz was healthy, would the D really have improved that much?
But....
If the Bills go out and get us some real talent for the D this offseason (hey, I can hope!)
Wannsstedt is going to be called a genius when the D improves. That happens in the NFL all the time.
Although, I believe Wade Phillips really knows how to run a defense……he brought Ted Washington with him when he turned it around in buffalo and Ted was a fantastic player and he is one of my favorite all-time bills, but was he talented enough to turn around the D all by himself?
Answer: I don’t know! I don’t remember how it all took place, but I do believe Wade himself made a big difference.
PodunkO - The great post ender!
Wade, at least defensively, was awesome in Buffalo.
"My new cat just farted on my lap. Smells like Bills football." BG.
by SERGEANT MAJOR THOR on Feb 4, 2012 9:21 PM EST up reply actions
To me, this screams that we need a better QB situation under Fitz. Seriously, cracked ribs? And they left him in to play three terrible games in a row? Thigpen could have played equally terribly while Fitz healed. I don’t understand at all…
Please, get a real backup QB.
"Slowly all the roles we act out become our identity. And in the end we are what we pretend to be." - Jerry Cantrell.
Why did they put more work on Fitz?
Interesting to see that Fitz had 229 pass attempts until the Washington game (32,71 per game). After the injury he had 340 pass attempts (37,77 per game). Maybe the problem was the defense giving up too many points and forcing offense to throw. Maybe the offense failed to trust or produce more on ground, running the ball more effectively.
the thing that i want to add/question, is what is the advantage to not admitting to the injury? as others point out, it gave Tony Romo and excuse to suck. Others may feel that it creates a target, but if the QB isn’t the biggest target for hits on the field, I don’t know who is. Plus, the ‘smartest’ coach in football (maybe ever) does the exact opposite of this. He would rather list 30 guys as injured, so that we can’t gameplan, and we don’t truly know how well someone can play, or we underestimate them. In addition, as i believe at least one other person notes, and was the first thing that came to mind: that is a fine-able offense for the organization to keep injured players of the injury list. So, this to me says one of two things: The staff somehow didn’t know (yeah right.) or the staff was covering this up, for basically no real reason. (again- QB is going to be pressured anyway)
This creates even more doubt in the capabilities of this “regime”. as walter sobchak would say: these guys are a "buncha bleeping amateurs. "
ABAYARDE IS NOSTRADAMUS JUST WATCH WE WILL NOT YIEALD TO NOBODY YOUR SOUL WE WILL TAKE
I'd believe
It was more Fitz feeling the pressure of his new contract before I’d believe Chan was covering it up. He may have confided in his teammates but denied it to the coaching staff because he wanted to play and live up to the contract. Not every guy is an Aaron Maybin and have to be told to earn their contract.
Harooo
He may have confided in his teammates but denied it to the coaching staff because he wanted to play and live up to the contract.
as has been the case often lately- this seems like a medical staff not addressing issues as they occur. you wanna know if he has screwed up ribs? do some x-rays. i mean, even if it were only a cartilage/inflammation situation(ie Mike Vick) , they should be aware of it.
ABAYARDE IS NOSTRADAMUS JUST WATCH WE WILL NOT YIEALD TO NOBODY YOUR SOUL WE WILL TAKE
as has been the case often lately- this seems like a medical staff not addressing issues as they occur.
I disagree with that. I think that they have been on top of things. They immediately took a look at him once they knew that he was injured. And didn’t they do a chest x-ray? I thought that I remember Fitz’s teammates ribbing him because he had to have his chest shaved before they did it.
You can disagree. But the facts are that he was injured, and he played. This has occurred throughout the league, in varying degrees. Reports consistently about guys playing injured. Not just hurt. Injured. At risk.
I don’t know what you recall. I really don’t even see the relevance. Gailey was asked specifically “how is fitz feeling?” and his response was “He is sore. He will be fine. He took a shot. He’ll be fine though. He will be good on Thursday, and he will be great on Sunday.”
That is clearly a lie, if he was playing injured. And… he managed a whopping 51.9 passer rating in that game he was to be “great” in. If you don’t agree, that is fine. But if you want to confirm the statements made, you need only to go here, and listen right about the 6 minute mark:
ABAYARDE IS NOSTRADAMUS JUST WATCH WE WILL NOT YIEALD TO NOBODY YOUR SOUL WE WILL TAKE
my bad.
obviously though, you can navigate it on your own… and you can find the oct 30 press conference. it IS what he said.
ABAYARDE IS NOSTRADAMUS JUST WATCH WE WILL NOT YIEALD TO NOBODY YOUR SOUL WE WILL TAKE
And I don’t understand your argument. I never said that he was never injured and I never said that it wasn’t a lie. In fact, I was pointing to stuff that actually points out that it was a lie.
I think that they have been on top of things. They immediately took a look at him once they knew that he was injured. And didn’t they do a chest x-ray?
they were so on top of it… that they either didn’t know, or they lied. that was my point.
ABAYARDE IS NOSTRADAMUS JUST WATCH WE WILL NOT YIEALD TO NOBODY YOUR SOUL WE WILL TAKE
My disagreement was with the statement that the medical staff wasn’t on top of the injury. That is what I disagree with you on and not that something doesn’t add up or that they might have lied. I think the Bills medical staff has done a phenomenal job over the years. And I think a good example of that is the Kevin Everett injury a few years back.
Just because they handled a tragic injury amazingly, doesn’t mean a lesser thing, couldn’t possibly go unnoticed. But it SHOULDN’T. that is MY point. there is no reason for this to be lied about, unless they didn’t know, and they should know. so, i just personally question it from top to bottom. You don’t have to. That’s cool. But to assume because one situation was handled well (no matter how well) doesn’t mean another can’t be handled poorly.
ABAYARDE IS NOSTRADAMUS JUST WATCH WE WILL NOT YIEALD TO NOBODY YOUR SOUL WE WILL TAKE
by ThaRealTruth on Feb 4, 2012 10:35 PM EST up reply actions
It's pain management for something like that. It's not an indictment on the medical staff.
I’m sure they were aware of the severity of the injury. It’s up to Ftiz and the coaches to figure out if he can play effectively (better than Thigpen). Since we never saw Thigpen play we can’t know if they made the right choice.
To make this into anything more though seems like blame finding. NFL players play with injuries and soreness every week, it doesn’t need to be reported unless it affects practice time.
"I got no problem with 7-9 coming off of 4-12 as long as I don't buy a couch there, you got to keep moving" - Mike Schoop
I will disagree, in that it is more significant than just blame finding. If they (Chan/Nix) can’t be trusted, what is the point in “reading into” or for that matter, even listening to anything they say? This is an instance where we have clearly not been told the whole truth, for SOME unknown reason, and to simply not question it, seems far more questionable, at least to me.
sure players play with injuries. some of them severe (torn ligaments in an ankle, might not keep you outta a Super Bowl, right? Didn’t keep me off the roof of my house when I needed to do a tear off and a brand new roof in a weekend, when i just happened to tear most of what was holding my ankle together (3 out of 5 major ligaments, not including Achilles/interior)) and some of those injuries, are less severe. None of this really relates to the fact that he was hurt enough for it to impact his play (maybe) and/or Chan blatantly lied about how injured he was… Or at VERY LEAST, he made a poor personnel decision, yet again, and was trying his best to keep it under wraps. Any of these things could be true. That is the problem with lying, and then being found out, but not confirming, or addressing things to any real degree. It leads to a number of interpretations, assumptions, or speculations.
ABAYARDE IS NOSTRADAMUS JUST WATCH WE WILL NOT YIEALD TO NOBODY YOUR SOUL WE WILL TAKE
Possibly
Or maybe he simply didn’t think it was necessary to tell us about it since it didn’t keep Fitz out of a game or practice after 1 week.
Gailey’s always been tight-lipped about injuries so it fits a pattern. Look at Dareus for example, he played half the year looking like The Terminator with that contraption on his arm, yet we never heard a peep about it.
It may have been a bad personnel decision to keep him in, but we don’t know for sure. After seeing what Romo, Big Ben and Vick played through this year though, I can’t say I’m surprised by the decision (right or wrong).
"I got no problem with 7-9 coming off of 4-12 as long as I don't buy a couch there, you got to keep moving" - Mike Schoop
Or maybe he simply didn’t think it was necessary to tell us about it since it didn’t keep Fitz out of a game or practice after 1 week.
The hit didn’t even occur until week 8. The fact though, that it didn’t keep him out of a game or practice is the issue entirely. Was that a poor decision? the stats show a clear decline.
Gailey’s always been tight-lipped about injuries so it fits a pattern.
A really bad pattern, of lying. He tends to just kinda disregard those questions, and wants them to ask about specific people. Now, to some degree, I am sure they have to be limited on what they say, due to HIPAA, but at the same time, they are also required to disclose certain types of injuries, based on how it affects their practicing, or ability to play. This is an example of how he might have been making a poor decision. That is all I said.
It may have been a bad personnel decision to keep him in, but we don’t know for sure. After seeing what Romo, Big Ben and Vick played through this year though, I can’t say I’m surprised by the decision (right or wrong).
I am not surprised either, and as far as not knowing for sure- his stats sure did seem to change. Sure there are plenty of variables, but it sure seems likely that could have been one of them.
ABAYARDE IS NOSTRADAMUS JUST WATCH WE WILL NOT YIEALD TO NOBODY YOUR SOUL WE WILL TAKE
Lying is part of being a good coach or GM. We can nitpick the instances, but for the most part. We need to just accept that they either can’t or shouldn’t talk about many things that go on behind the scenes. It’s not really surprising nor concerning.
I have low expectations. But high hopes.
agree, slighlty
but when asked something outright, and then lying about it, and then being caught in said lie, is disconcerting, to say the least. you might see it as a positive. I don’t. i find it concerning. not necessarily do i understand why it isn’t surprising either. i am surprised that he would see some kind of need to keep that under wraps, for all the reasons i have given so far.
ABAYARDE IS NOSTRADAMUS JUST WATCH WE WILL NOT YIEALD TO NOBODY YOUR SOUL WE WILL TAKE
That was a nasty hit.
For those of you wondering why Gailey didn’t tell the media, I think he didn’t want opposing teams to know his QB had cracked ribs. Look what happen once the Cowboys let the world Know Romo (trying to show he is tough and leader) had a broken rib, San Fran said they were gonna target his ribs.
i disagree with this logic
sure, it seems common sense. but when are guys NOT looking to drill a QB, particularly in the ribs, because they aren’t allowed to hit them too high?
ABAYARDE IS NOSTRADAMUS JUST WATCH WE WILL NOT YIEALD TO NOBODY YOUR SOUL WE WILL TAKE
I started to think about this prior to the Denver game
Some Denver fans asked on the “Ask a Bills Fan” thread on Mile High Report about why the Bills dropped.
It didn’t make sense that he went from very good to very average that fast, without a tremendous degradation in the talent around him.
Fitzpatrick is a tremendous leader and a good QB. Doesn’t change my draft thoughts, but I’m glad he’s on the Bills.
Re-starting the official Buffalo "Draft a quarterback in the First Round in 2012" campaign.
It didn’t make sense that he went from very good to very average that fast, without a tremendous degradation in the talent around him.
So, you don’t feel that was the case?
Fitzpatrick is a tremendous leader and a good QB. Doesn’t change my draft thoughts, but I’m glad he’s on the Bills.
He made me a Bill-iever in him. I still think his feet (thus his accuracy) suck… and that I too hope to see at very least a suitable backup added to the roster, but I agree that I am glad to have him. He will be a great instructor/backup to our new QB someday soon, and is certainly serviceable as a game manager.
ABAYARDE IS NOSTRADAMUS JUST WATCH WE WILL NOT YIEALD TO NOBODY YOUR SOUL WE WILL TAKE
I think the only players with injury questions around week 8 were Donald Jones, Bell, and Hairston, but I might be wrong about that. Stevie Johnson was hurt, but he was also hurt before the Redskins game. Jackson, Wood, Urbik, etc. got hurt later on.
Agree completely with your second point. Example: If Buffalo were to get Luck or RGIII, I wouldn’t take another QB in the league to be the starter of the present, and mentor.
Re-starting the official Buffalo "Draft a quarterback in the First Round in 2012" campaign.
i don’t recall either. i just was curious when the “landslide” of injuries were mounting. I thought it was week or 9 ish. Fred was week 10, i am almost positive.
They only other guy I would want as a mentor, would obviously be Manning. Though, he would likely start by asking Chan why he is running such a simple offense. hahaha. Other than a proven veteran franchise QB, Fitz would be a clearly good choice. I wouldn’t ask him to assist with mechanics/footwork, but I have no issue with his understanding of route combinations/ Chan’s methodology. They seem to be on the same page. I think that Ryan could develop into a good OC- Maybe even for Chan, as they seem to have a great rapport.
ABAYARDE IS NOSTRADAMUS JUST WATCH WE WILL NOT YIEALD TO NOBODY YOUR SOUL WE WILL TAKE
Fitz Hurt
Sounds like a tough guy, just not sure why they let him play hurt? Explains throwing issues ie ints.
Don't Worry, Be Happy!
Do we believe?
I didn’t follow Fitz’s career before he came to Buffalo…but do we believe he can take us to a Super Bowl?
by rexachss on Feb 4, 2012 11:53 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Fitz being hurt is only part of it
The Bills were a very good team when they were healthy. They simply weren’t a very deep team at any position. Once the starters began getting hurt the lack of depth showed.
Whether Fitz was hurt or not, he didn’t play defense. This team showed a very weak pass rush and they paid dearly for it. They weren’t a team that was going to win a shoot out for 16 weeks.
(London Fletcher destroys Fitzy)--(Fitzy on the field waiting for the call)
Fitz: C’mon then.
Gailey: WHAT!?!
Fitz: Have at them!
Gailey: You are indeed brave, Sir Amish Rifle, but the fight is theirs.
Fitz: Oh, had enough ay?
Gailey: Look you stupid bastard, you’ve got no arms left!
Fitz: Yes I have.
Gailey: LOOK!!!
Fitz: Just a flesh wound.
Gailey: Fine, I’ll leave Thiggy on the sideline.
"Everyone who has conducted an expedition will know how ready the world is to do the great injustice of heaping the whole praise or blame for its success or failure on the shoulders of the leader alone."
-Polar Explorer Fridtjof Nansen
by NordicBillsfan on Feb 4, 2012 6:43 PM EST reply actions 3 recs
doink
Wake up tyler. Don’t want another practice ball hitting you.
Smoking kills. If you're killed, you've lost a very important part of your life.
- Brooke Shields
by Let's Go Buffalo (UK) on Feb 4, 2012 7:13 PM EST via mobile up reply actions

"Everyone who has conducted an expedition will know how ready the world is to do the great injustice of heaping the whole praise or blame for its success or failure on the shoulders of the leader alone."
-Polar Explorer Fridtjof Nansen
by NordicBillsfan on Feb 5, 2012 12:42 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
NICE
GAILEY: How do you know you are injured? You look fine to me.
FITZ: They dressed me up like this, and this isn’t my beard, it’s a false one.
Ron Paul 2012
by BuffaloBlueBlood on Feb 4, 2012 7:20 PM EST via mobile up reply actions 3 recs
hope that was the problem
So do I
by rexachss on Feb 4, 2012 11:55 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
Okay, people need to get off of this "scapegoat" thing.
There was nothing that George Edwards did in the 2 years he had as a DC that showed that his getting sacked was anything BUT a necessary and inevitable step. He wasn’t a “scapegoat”, or a “fall guy”, or a “patsy”, or a “mark”, or victim in any other capacity.
He fielded a lousy defense 2 years in a row with no visible or evident sign of consistant improvement. Bad coaches get fired.
by Wien on Feb 4, 2012 8:48 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
really?
how about putting DE/DTs at a linebacker spot? that is clearly questionable.
26th ranked defense? that isn’t a reason for him to be fired? I mean, that is 2 spots WORSE than his 24th ranked defense from 2010. Lets look at the dolphins’ record when he was there…. oh, how about 22nd ranked defense. He obviously wasn’t a “difference maker” as a coach. Not as an assistant, not as a DC. You wanna promote him to HC and see if he does better?
I have said he was a scapegoat, in the past. But the reality is, that he wasn’t even fielding a defense in the top half of the league. You can’t say “offense this, offense that” and have that equate to the defense sucks, all the time. Plenty of teams have good defenses, and bad offenses. Not many teams devote entire drafts to one side of the ball. Fewer still do it perennially. Unless they suck.
ABAYARDE IS NOSTRADAMUS JUST WATCH WE WILL NOT YIEALD TO NOBODY YOUR SOUL WE WILL TAKE
I think you may have misread what Wien was saying.
"Everyone who has conducted an expedition will know how ready the world is to do the great injustice of heaping the whole praise or blame for its success or failure on the shoulders of the leader alone."
-Polar Explorer Fridtjof Nansen
by NordicBillsfan on Feb 5, 2012 12:43 AM EST up reply actions
Ha!
Beat me to it! Yeah…and I honestly thought
We were “stuck” with Edwards for the full 5 year rebuild. Glad to have Wanny, and I’m sure he’s glad he’s inheriting a D that will draft heavily on D again. It’ll make Fitzy’s job that much easier.
by buffaloparks on Feb 5, 2012 12:51 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
yup. i sure did.
sorry Wien, I really don’t know how i read that the first time, but i thought you were somehow defending him. that was probably cuz i glazed over your last statement too quickly or something. i apologize, and, i completely agree with you. I basically, already explained why. :) haha.
ABAYARDE IS NOSTRADAMUS JUST WATCH WE WILL NOT YIEALD TO NOBODY YOUR SOUL WE WILL TAKE
I think you agree...
With Wien here and everyone else saying Edwards just didn’t get the job done…hence, not a scapegoat.
by buffaloparks on Feb 5, 2012 12:47 AM EST via mobile up reply actions
yeah.
I’m an idiot. Only occasionally though. (hopefully)
ABAYARDE IS NOSTRADAMUS JUST WATCH WE WILL NOT YIEALD TO NOBODY YOUR SOUL WE WILL TAKE
Channeling your inner Clint Eastwood
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_VrFV5r8cs0
.
When the job is finished no one remembers how long it took, just how well it was performed.
by Buffalo for Eternity on Feb 5, 2012 6:14 AM EST up reply actions
haha, i suppose so.
i will not only recognize, but acknowledge that i am not exactly infallible.
ABAYARDE IS NOSTRADAMUS JUST WATCH WE WILL NOT YIEALD TO NOBODY YOUR SOUL WE WILL TAKE
So, it seems my observation was correct....
I mentioned in a previous post awhile back that I thought that Fitz was hurt in one of the games in the middle of the season (I couldn’t remember what game it was but new it was against an NFC opponent…I thought it was the NY Giants) and said that I thought that had a big impact on his play afterwards, but that part of my post was essentially ignored.
To be sure, the fact that Fitz was indeed injured goes a long way towards explaining his poor performance in the games immediately after the injury. But, there’s another factor that hurt Fitz’s performance and contributed a lot to the increase in interceptions that many are also ignoring.
While most Bills fans may see Donald Jones as little more than a complimentary figure in the overall scheme of the Bills’ offense, the loss of Donald Jones—and earlier Marcus Easley—had a huge negative impact on the Bills’ offense that directly impacted Fitz’s interception percentage. After the trade of Lee Evans, Jones and Easley were the only two receivers on the Bills with the speed to stretch defenses—and Jones was the only one to make it through to opening day.
Even if we fans may question Jones’ hands and ability to get separation, nevertheless, opposing defenses had to respect his deep speed when he was on the field. This opened up more space for Stevie Johnson, David Nelson and Scott Chandler to operate in underneath in the middle of the field. Without that deep threat, the windows for Fitz to throw the ball through to these receivers and to the RBs got appreciably smaller. The fact that Stevie and Chandler both were then hobbled and Fred Jackson went down further increased the difficulty for Fitzpatrick. The effect of this on Nelson’s production was noticeable.
The shift of Smith to WR was a disaster. For all of his supposed speed, he never posed a sufficient deep threat for opposing defenses to have to consistently respect him. It wasn’t until Derek Hagen settled in with the Bills enough to get decent playing time that things opened up for Fitz and the Bills’ offense again—which was reflected in Fitz’s somewhat better play towards the end of the season. But, by then, the Bills had lost too many of their other weapons for the offense to play up to the standards it had set in the first half of the season and it was too late…they had already lost too many games.
Considering his injury and all of the other injuries that the Bills suffered on the offensive side of the ball, Fitz had a pretty decent year. While I don’t think he will ever be an elite level franchise QB, if the Bills can keep their primary weapons and keep them healthy, I do believe that Chan and Fitz are good enough to produce enough points per game to make the Bills a playoff team, IF—and this is a huge IF—they can field a good defense and solid special teams. The problem is that, at present, they still need too many quality players on defense and don’t have sufficient quality depth on both sides of the ball yet. And, it may be too difficult to acquire all of the types of players that they need in just this one offseason. Which means that they are going to have to keep all of their best players (Stevie and Freddy in particular) and somehow get them to stay healthy for the whole season if they are going to compete for a playoff spot.
Finally, as to why Chan and the Bills may have lied about Fitz’s injury: they do not have to reveal an injury if the player practices fully and virtually every coach in the NFL tries, in one way or the other, to keep opponents from knowing the true state of the injuries to his team.
Belichick has said that he would list every player on his roster as questionable if he could (he actually tried to do that once) because, in his view, there’s a question about whether any player will actually play in a game until he does. Even though the NFL has tried to take steps to keep him from doing that, he still lists every player that he possibly can on his weekly injury report in order to hide those that are serious from his opponents. That’s the way that he does it. Other teams either flat out lie to the press or refuse to talk about injuries. When Sanchez hurt his hand this season, Rex Ryan lied to the press about the severity of it. There is a long tradition of coaches minimizing the seriousness of the injuries to their players. On the other hand, there have even been coaches in the past who have overstated the seriousness of injuries in order to gain what they perceived to be an edge.
For those who question why a head coach would lie to the press and fans about the seriousness of a player’s injury, let me just say that periodically Mike Golic of ESPN’s “Mike and Mike in the Morning” has talked about the mentality of defensive players in the NFL and the approach that they would take in a game if they knew that an opposing player had a certain type of injury: they would make a special effort to try to hit that player where he is injured in order to get him out of the game.
As someone who has been watching and closely following pro football for over 50 years I would tell any fan, in defense of Chan Gailley and Buddy Nix, "Don’t ever expect a head coach or General Manager of a professional sports team to tell you “the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth” about their team or what they are thinking or planning. They are not in the “truth” business; they are in the business of trying to win games in their sport; and if it suits their purposes not to tell you the whole truth or everything you may want to know about their team, they will not tell you, even if it means flat out lying. If you want to know what they are thinking or planning you have to become very good at observing and reading between the lines to even get a semblance of a clue of what the real truth is. And, that applies to each and every one of them, no matter how “open” they may appear to be in talking to the media and fans.
What Chan and Fitz did is no different than what a lot of coaches and players have done and continue to do in every sport.
Those who do not learn fromt eh past are doomed to repeat it.
by LifetimeBillsFan on Feb 5, 2012 1:58 AM EST reply actions 3 recs
I agree. There seems to be a vein on these threads that crops out that is something along the lines of “Why do we employ liars?”
Hello. Anybody home? Think McFly. Think!
Lets cut the naivete. Its the NFL. These guys choose their words carefully for all sorts of strategic reasons. Name me a competent NFL coach or GM and I’ll show you a “liar”. But who cares? This isn’t defrauding grandmas, its trying to maintain a strategic edge over their competition.
Maybe Buddy and Chan can stop all this diabolical dishonesty and start publishing gameplans and draft boards and publicize all of the ins and outs of negotiations so we can know precisely what is going on all the time…. That sounds like the type of incompetence we could learn to love.
I have low expectations. But high hopes.
And I remember many fans making fun of "Chix" when everyone called them "straight-shooters"
I’ve realized many on this board, and all other boards too, like to complain just to complain. I guess we just have to live with the fact that every decision that is made by this team will be second guessed to exhaustion.
"I got no problem with 7-9 coming off of 4-12 as long as I don't buy a couch there, you got to keep moving" - Mike Schoop
rec'd
Very well written. Teams hide injuries all the time. In hockey, coaches flat out lie saying a guy has an upper-body injury when he has a high ankle sprain. If they (the Bills) didn’t make it public, good for them. If Fitz was able to practice to the extent of the rules and that allowed Chan to not list him, then GOOD FOR CHAN FOR KNOWING THE RULES as they are written.
Remember, knowledge is power. The more the other teams know about your weaknesses, the more they have the chance to exploit them and possibly affect the outcome.
I'd rather go out in a blaze of glory, then slowly fade away in the antiquities of time.
Fitz would have had lesser 2nd half, anyway but...
throwing a football with cracked ribs is no joke. He was probably receiving injections to alleviate the pain, it’s a lot harder to stand tough back there when you don’t want to hit in the ribs again. The injuries around him coupled with his own injury, it’s almost impossible to accurately assess how good or bad Fitzpatrick really is. I have a hunch that going into his 3rd year under Gailey and with his health and a healthy receiving corps we’ll see more “Good Fitz” than “Bad Fitz.”
"I don't agree with a damn thing you say, but I would die for your right to say it."
"If I had to do it all over again, I'd do it all over again."
Injury Report
Wouldnt the team be required to put him on the injury report if he was hurt?
by phalupah on Feb 5, 2012 2:28 PM EST via mobile reply actions
Injury Report
Wouldnt the team be required to put him on the injury report if he was hurt?
by phalupah on Feb 5, 2012 2:28 PM EST via mobile reply actions
Fitz is tough!
Fitz is a gamer. He takes his shots from the defense, then he takes his own shots down the field. He doesn’t whine, he doesn’t make lame excuses. He’s smart, and while not an elite-level QB, is good enough when healthy and with enough talent around him to take this team far. Yes, even win a Super Bowl. We’re lucky to have him. Rock on, Fitz.
typical bills post season marketing
they have to sell this team for next season… so blame mediocre qb play on injury…. infact, they didnt even have to do the work…
the fans were only wishing/waiting for this london fletcher hit to be the cause for our drop off later in the season….
all they had to do was on small yes from a WR of the team and the fans are lapping it up…
all of sudden, there is hope for the 2012 season for these fans… either bills are marketing geniuses or the bills’ fans are the easiest to sway
If the Bills were going to talk about it, wouldn’t the Bills have, ya know, talked about it. Gailey and Nix both had a chance and didn’t. Fitzpatrick seems peeved word got out. Why have the team’s 4th string WR get the word out? Doesn’t make a whole lot of sense.
by MattRichWarren on Feb 7, 2012 9:25 AM EST up reply actions

by 




























