| Sign Up | Google+

3rd and 1 vs 3rd and 2... totally different for the 2011 Bills

Editor's Note: I'm front paging this simply because I find the stat mind-boggling and discussion worthy. Nice catch, jonramz. - BG

For a team with two very good running backs and a good offensive line, you would think that third and short would be a running down. Well, you would be half right...

For the Buffalo Bills, 3rd and 1 was completely different than 3rd and 2. 3rd and 2 was treated much more as a passing down than as a running down

3rd and 1

Shotgun: 24%
Pass: 14%
Run: 86%
Wildcat: 28% (60% success rate) Brad Smith stopped only once
QB Sneak 33%
Overall success rate 62% (one success via penalty)

3rd and 2

Shotgun: 69%
Pass: 85%
Run: 15%
Wildcat: 50%
Overall success rate: 46% (all runs were successful)

Considering the Bills were ranked No. 28 in the NFL in third down percentage last year, this might be something worth looking into. At minimum, we should all re-consider the usefulness of Brad Smith; even if his role is limited to that of a short-yardage player, he's highly effective at it.

                                                                                                                                                                                                               

Just another great fan opinion shared on the pages of BuffaloRumblings.com.

Recent FanPosts

View All Fan Posts

The Next FanPosts

There are 23 Comments. Load Now. Loading

Shortcuts to mastering the comment thread. Use wisely.

C - Next Comment
X - Mark as Read

R - Reply
Z - Mark Read & Next

Shift + C - Previous
Shift + A - Mark All Read

Comment Settings

Live comment alert: Hide it!

Comments for this post are closed.

tracking_pixel_5341_tracker tracking_pixel_5351_tracker